What Most Get WRONG About the Christian Worldview

These are some of the most common worldview MYTHS that people fall for. In this video, Dr. Terry Mortenson gives an in-depth explanation of the origins of the earth and the biblical worldview.
This video is part of a series titled Defending a Young Earth with Terry Mortenson. You can watch the rest of the series here:
www.Answers.tv/defending-a-yo...
========
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics (Christianity-defending) ministry dedicated to enabling Christians to defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ effectively.
On our KZbin channel, you’ll find answers to your most pressing questions about key issues like creation, evolution, science, the age of the earth, and social issues. We desire to train believers to develop a worldview based on the Bible and expose the bankruptcy of evolutionary ideas and their implications.
You’ll hear from top teachers such as Ken Ham, Bryan Osborne, Dr. Georgia Purdom, Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson, Tim Chaffey, Bodie Hodge, Dr. Gabriela Haynes, Dr. Terry Mortenson, and more.
Please help us continue to share the gospel around the world: AnswersinGenesis.org/give

[@ogmakefirefiregood]

I once had the secular world view. It's amazing the level of lies the world spews out. GOD will vindicate his great name. There is nothing in the universe that can stop him.

[@harpintn]

I am glad that some people are still standing up for the word of GOD and all the teachings it contains.

[@VestalNumbre]

Want to discuss these All Scripture is inspired of God+ and beneficial for teaching,+ for reproving, for setting things straight,+ for disciplining in righteousness

[@davidperry3096]

So good to see such a prominent theologian working with Answers in Genesis.

[@avafury4584]

Thank you answers in Genesis ❤️🕊️

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

God bless you AIG 🙏🙏🙏✝️ So much appreciate everything you do

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

🤢🤮

[@tannermcginn7330]

That was GOOD. I sure hope AiG posts the rest of the episodes in this series on KZbin as well.

[@lestersatterthwaite409]

Thank you. Very thought provoking. You have changed my outlook and the Bible is completely accurate. Glory to GOD!!

[@fohrum4757]

😂

[@annieoaktree6774]

Poe's Law.

[@globalcoupledances]

@@annieoaktree6774 TY from WikiPedia: Poe's law is an adage of internet culture which says that, without a clear indicator of the author's intent, any parodic or sarcastic expression of extreme views can be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of those views

[@SK-bw2cv]

That's right bro!

[@drillyourarguments]

most helpful athiest comment:@@fohrum4757

[@jamesandgames623]

The late Dr Michael Heiser once said let the Bible say what it says. I'm going with that myself! ♥️

[@josieangels7771]

We need this, a clear concise articulation of Biblical truths.

[@Reclaimer77]

Biblical truths just mean things written in the Bible. Most of them are not true.

[@johnryan6658]

Who's biblical truths? Mark or John or who? They don't even agree with each other when telling the same story.

[@veritasestlux]

@@Username34823 First of all, those laws were for Ancient Israel. Compared to American sl@very, God's version is rather docile. It even lets them free after seven years of service. God's version of sl@very even states that you cannot k1dnap someone into sl@very. Furthermore, many people in that time were willing to go into sl@very and serve their masters.

[@jackdublanica]

​@@veritasestluxYes, you can sell yourself into slavery if you were heavily in debt.

[@veritasestlux]

@@jackdublanica ...OR if you wanted a job or wanted to help in any way you can.

[@HAMZOIKPLAYS]

Awesome topic guys , thank yoh for shining light on these issues . God richly bless you all

[@samuelrodriguez9199]

There are many false teachers out there. Too many. God will sort it all out in the end.

[@MagnificoMaltese]

I now understand when it says in revelation that “even the elect” will be deceived. These men have been deceived!

[@bobford4484]

In what way have they been deceived?

[@johnglad5]

​@@bobford4484 The elect will believe the great deception. The devil will come with great signs and wonders. He will be mortally wounded and recover.

[@bobford4484]

​@@johnglad5I know that scripture concept I was asking is how these particular contemporary Christian leaders "have been" deceived.

[@3345646]

My Bible says MT 24:24 “ If it were possible” implies it is so bad that without God the elect would not withstand it. Mt24:24 kjv For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.

[@3345646]

It doesn’t mean the elect are decieved . If it were possible means impossible to me in my humble opinion.

[@stevereightler4126]

Amen! Looking forward to the next episode.

[@zerosteel0123]

Love the way you always stick to the word, AIG. Keep it up! Praying for you 🙏

[@AR-rz3tk]

Anticipating part two.😊

[@dokidokibibleclub]

I was confused in the first two seconds seeing WLC used as an exemplary icon for "Christian Leaders"... then I heard the rest and thought. Oh, now it makes sense

[@Roma_901]

@@Moist._Robotwho’s your best? Matt Dillahunty, Richard Dawkins? Lol

[@mr.commonsense]

@@Roma_901 better than anyone you'll have

[@HS-zk5nn]

@@Roma_901 Dawkins who gets laughed at when he tries to define nothing 😂

[@Gek1177]

WLC is by a wide margin the most intelligent and rational apologist working today which is why it's not surprising that many AiG fans dislike him. AiG attracts the least intelligent and educated fundamentalists.

[@avafury4584]

​@@Moist._Robot no he isn't. He is a theistic evolutionist

[@boni2786]

Great

[@MagnificoMaltese]

I will await more on this! Thank you so much for this, I look forward to learn more. I had NO IDEA this was going on in the church and in seminary.

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

Grow up

[@veritasestlux]

@@--..-...-..-.--.... You can show that you can grow up by not spurting out petty insults.

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

@scripturedude it's not an insult. It's just another way to say do better

[@veritasestlux]

@@--..-...-..-.--.... People WILL take that as an insult because it also sounds like "you're immature". Just saying.

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

@@veritasestlux well I can't help it if you're insecure to think that

[@davidperry3096]

Great to see R T Kendall with AIG

[@laever1804]

Really great presentation. I am looking forward to your next episode.

[@yougetagoldstar]

Thank you for this, Terry.

[@user-or9tw1ct6l]

Love this basic intro to the layers of evolution. Indeed, believing evolution or a theory is an actual understanding of the world.

[@paulwood6636]

Thank you Dr. Mortenson

[@donnussbaum4234]

Excellent!

[@gregattanasio3185]

IN CHRIST ALONE ANYTHING ELSE IS SINKING SAND... Those who believe in evolution are in DEEP QUICKSAND.. PEACE TO ALL

[@MagnificoMaltese]

I would love to see a debate between you and Dr Craig!

[@newcreationinchrist1423]

AIG has posted a lot of articles on Dr. Craig. A very interesting read.

[@iamshredder3587]

Yeah personally I don't care much for debates like that. They're often more about who's the better debater on the day than or even who's more popular than about getting to the truth. One can win a debate and still be completely wrong yet many will think otherwise.

[@stevenkaae9490]

Amazing truth, thank you for this eye opening video.

[@mr.commonsense]

love how you're blind to see the truth

[@tressabowles5817]

As I was listening, I was really hoping you were gonna get there. But you did good for you. This issue is believing God at his word. It goes right back to the same problem in the garden..... We are being given the option of accepting god at his word.... Or something else..... Tree of life.... Or tree of the knowledge of good and evil...... Choose this day whom you will serve....... Come out for my people

[@Jewonastick]

Is believing an option to you?

[@jasonreed6381]

30:02 this used to be me untl i watched Ken Ham and Bill Nye debates. Look it up. Its really good and respectful. Best debate ever!

[@darin7369]

Jesus said, "I praise you Father, for you have hidden these things from the wise and the learned and revealed them to children." In the same way that the Pharisees and teachers of the law in Jesus' time nullified God's word through their man-made theology, our modern day theologians are nullifying God's word with their own man-made theology and even adopting the theology of evolution. None of the Apostles attended Bible college. They did not use man-made interpretations of scripture as their guide. Instead, they used God's word itself as their theology and got their understanding from the Spirit which new dwelt within them. The church needs to cast off this modern day system that puts man up on a pedestal and get back to the system given to us by Christ which was demonstrated by the apostles.

[@Username34823]

hypocrite. d jesus says sell your posessions and give to charity, are you gonna listen to your slaver God? or are you gonna keep playing pretend and cherry picking?

[@globalcoupledances]

@darthmarvel1061 - Yes, sell the 100 million Ark Encounter

[@estimatingonediscoveringthree]

Decay rates are not constant

[@annieoaktree6774]

Maybe in your fantasy world. In this world there is zero evidence radiometric decay rates have ever changes.

[@estimatingonediscoveringthree]

@@annieoaktree6774 not correct. The decay rates are directly related to the greater magnetic field they are in. This is obvious and make total sence if your understanding the electromagnetic nature of atoms molecules and “gravity”

[@Gek1177]

​​@@estimatingonediscoveringthreeif that were true nothing would exist. Since stuff exists decay rates are constant.

[@estimatingonediscoveringthree]

@@Gek1177 that makes no sense. Radioactive is the decay of “particles” from a nucleus. It’s related to charge and densest packing principles of spherical geometry. Conversly the sun is creating and building large atoms constantly. So there is always a constant source. Every element on the period table is found in the solar wind and every solar wind(likely-but we don’t know much about what’s outside our galaxy-fact)

[@Gek1177]

​@@estimatingonediscoveringthreeit makes no sense to you because you are an undereducated religious fundamentalist. It makes sense to a person with a casual familiarity with physics because those decay rates are based on the the interactions of the fundamental forces and of the forces were appreciably different enough in strength for decay rates to alter that would make the fundamental forces different which I should not need to tell you would mean the atoms that exist now couldn't exist and do nothing that exists now could exist. Honestly, your assertion proves how scientifically illiterate you are.

[@APR4U]

Very informative and helpful thank you 🙏 I am with you 🤗 just as GOD SAID🌈. APR4U

[@DenieceHelms-zc2dg]

They in their wisdom prove themselves fools. I don't know where this is, somewhere in the new testament. Very appropriate here!

[@ariramo9108]

Evolution is the biggest lie ever told.

[@annieoaktree6774]

Claiming "evolution is a lie" is the biggest lie ever told.

[@Watcher_of_the_Heavens]

Saying god is a trinity is the biggest lie ever told.

[@Creekstain]

Evolution is nothing more than a theory. It has yet to be proven. That's why it called the theory of evolution. Inuits still need clothes. They never grew hair. WE ARE THE ONLY MAMMAL THAT DOES NOT RECEIVE EVERYTHING WE NEED TO SURVIVE AT BIRTH. Why?

[@cosmictreason2242]

@@Moist._Robotthat's axfhakky the fundamental truth

[@Gek1177]

Evolution is one of if not the most robustly supported theory on the history of humanity. At this point either God designed evolution or God isn't real.

[@jasonreed6381]

41:45 the leaders that promote millions of years has a huge faith problem. Wolves in sheeps clothing. Jesus warned us about them. We shall know them by there fruits...... Keep your eyes on your leaders fruit, not them. Praise God!!!

[@hozn]

Creation and flood topics are very important in these last days. Peter wrote why

[@HereIam-rg3vy]

I’m having some success in getting the Bible put into the Fiction section of my local library

[@johngood3163]

Nice. Too long but nice work

[@appaloosa42]

I would add another C. After ‘corruption’ add ‘choosing’ … ( or ‘continuity’ when God singled out one bloodline to continue the plan.

[@danieldowdell9831]

Good Today! __"Jesus the Christ of GOD ", a simple Trueth easily found in the early writtings of the Jewish Be-Livers of the " Way, Trueth, Life ". __humbly, neighbour daniel __p.s. thanks for increasing our knowledge .

[@DarkAryen]

I've been looking for a video like this that talks about the famous so-called "Christians" in the media and academia, who defend evolution (in one way or another), thus denying Genesis and, with it, most of the Bible - from all the New Testament authors who refer to Genesis as historical, to Jesus Himself, who mentions Genesis as History both in the Gospels and in Revelation. It's not possible to be a Christian (born again of the Spirit) and, at the same time, deny the Spirit's work: the inspired word of God! These men blaspheme, rob God of His glory and ruin the true and only Gospel.

[@friisteching3433]

Wouldn't it be more accurate to say that the person writing a certain passage was not divinely inspirit and was accidentally included in scriptures. Because what he wrote does not fit with objective verifiable evidence. That means that a Jesus reference wasn't meant to include that person who wrote a mistake.

[@davoforrest5]

Amen, if the first Adam is not the literal, historical father of the human race then the Second Adam is of no consequence, what a horrible consideration; no hope for my sin riddled condition, no redemption. Praise Yahweh All the Bible is true and the Second Adam has redeemed me from the original sin of the first Adam ❤

[@Gek1177]

Adam is not the literal historical father of the human race. There's never been fewer than a thousand humans.

[@Gek1177]

​@@emigs8712 don't say things that are so obviously untrue. You're not intrigued or even interested in human history. To answer your question. "Genomic inference of a severe human bottleneck during the Early to Middle Pleistocene transition" - 2023 Wangjie Hu Ziqian Hao et al.

[@Gek1177]

@@emigs8712 see, why would anyone follow a religion that produces people like who who are so completely lacking integrity?

[@Gek1177]

@@emigs8712 your tinfoil hat is on too tight. Next time, don't ask questions you don't want the answer to. It's dishonest. You should have learned that from your father.

[@burnttoast2790]

@@emigs8712 Making God go away isn't actually impossible. All we need would be chariots of iron.

[@TickedOffPriest]

So many assumptions that go into false world views.

[@TheSaintFrenzy]

Like?

[@TickedOffPriest]

@@TheSaintFrenzy Such as the absence of catastrophism...

[@MrAuskiwi101]

What many get wrong about the Christian world view is imagining it has substance

[@christchurchottawa]

❤❤❤

[@Akitorbenov]

I'm with pastor Voodie Baucham on this topic and i wonder.....if a paontar can paint a picture as it is in his mind, let's say he paints a man, will he paint the man in his 1st month or in his 30s? Or 50s? And if he man has behind a mountain, will the painter paint is as boiling magma while forming, or as if the mountain has ages in it's past? Why God Almighty can't have created in 6 days a universe that looks like it has eons on it's past?

[@matieu6611]

WEEL THAT'S IT! I'M NEVER EATING ATTA FAST FOOD JOINT AGAIN !!!!!!!!!!!!

[@warrenrodgers7544]

Good video

[@tressabowles5817]

In fact knowing the truth is so important the scriptures allude to that a lot..... It says you don't have to turn a life because you have not the love of the truth..... It says that my people are destroyed for lack of knowledge. And if we know scripture and God we know that his knowledge is truth..... Yeshua Refers to himself as the way the truth and the Life....... And in the book of revelation, it describes the saints several times in a very similar way. It says here's the perseverance of the saints. Those who keep the commandments of God and have the faith ( Testimony) Of Yeshua ha'mashiach.....Truths that the Kingdom of the enemy is trying to Erase..... So this is all about the truth and it is all about having a love of the truth.

[@JB-yb4wn]

It is a fact that people were destroyed by a lack of knowledge, a lack of knowledge that your church upheld because it contradicted the gospels.

[@hglundahl]

17:45 sth ... did he say _LINGUISTICS?_ Where exactly does he get that claim? As majoring in Latin, without even a licentiate, but still lots of good exams, a Latin professor who loved Chomsky, a Greek professor who could do his Brugmann equations (I recall one which made me blush, a less shameless one is, "have" and "habere" are not cognates), I wonder what he means by that ... btw, the Greek professor loved to mention Trubetskoy's doubt on the existence of PIE. And it was not because he was a Fundamentalist or anything like that. Definitely he wasn't. (Isn't? Not sure if he's still alive, and obviously, he could have changed his mind, but 20 years ago, I think he hadn't).

[@drillyourarguments]

wow, evalooshunist NoGodists AND Theistic Evolutionists are abundant here!

[@Nils-gi5bv]

"We find that science’s descriptions of cosmological, geological, and biological evolution are not in conflict with theology." Common statement of all central conferences of the worldwide United Methodist Church. You will find similar statements from Lutherans, Reformed, Calvinists, some Baptists and even from the konservativ Roman-Katholic Church. So AIG, IGH, ICR, etc. and their Bible Belt followers are the absolute minority.

[@luish1498]

did they change the title?

[@annieoaktree6774]

Yes. The first title complaining about the "evolution worldview" was too embarrassing.

[@3345646]

Mixing the Bible and man centered Science is a problem. Mixing the Bible and psychology is another issue just as problematic.

[@jamesandgames623]

Has anyone figured out why God loves yet?. I'm still working on that one myself!.

[@bobford4484]

God chooses to love.

[@AmazingBible316]

It is his nature to love ... creation itself, he created from his love.

[@shocksound9]

I don’t think he does; why would someone flood the entire earth and then blame it on people having sex

[@leonardbrown601]

It’s hard for the church to teach somethings that they don’t understand.

[@raya.p.l5919]

Jesus power ❤ starts now.

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

That was the goofiest thing I've ever read on here🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Jesus power activate!

[@raya.p.l5919]

@@--..-...-..-.--.... well let me top that. Once I asked the devil before I ripped his soul out I said what would u do if u win an get my power. He said I would destroy this universe and create a new one. I said that sounds lonely. Anyhow for yr reply u will receive Jesus healing energy all old aches and pains will be washed away takes 30 minutes best to relax and shut yr eyes. Also 11 07 eastren night level 1 portion of youth longevity digestion an self beauty Jesus energy wash. Negative energy will creep out yr feet tell it's time. Or I'm lying an yr closest friends won't experience it to. Ohh it will last 7 days an 7 hours. Could be long term it's always been yr choice

[@jasonreed6381]

47:46 See Faith problem.......

[@NancySwass-jv4kp]

The gospel HAS NOT CHANGED. NOR HAVE CHRISTIAN CORE BELIEFS.

[@nathanwhite704]

Ignorance and lies.

[@drillyourarguments]

elaborate@@nathanwhite704

[@nathanwhite704]

@@drillyourarguments Not sure how I just saw your reply but ok. You evangelicals are the most uneducated group about your own religion that exists. What you evangelicals believe begins with Martin Luther who attempted to reform the Catholic Church. So therefore you are Catholic Lite. Roughly 1200 years earlier in Antiquity there were Christianities ies meaning PLURAL not a singular Christianity and every single one one of them had a radically different gospel radically different God even God(S) radically different views on Jesus. Some Christianities had 365 Gods others like the Jews had a Council of 70 as God. Some were Ditheists meaning they had a God unknown and unknowable that was Absolute good another God who was evil and that God they called The Demiurge who created the earth and the whole physical realm as a prison for our minds and the only way to escape is to ascend above The Demiurge and his false Heaven by rebelling against him and accepting that you are one with the True God the God of Paul/Marcion who sent Christ. The 12 Apostles are myths Jesus is a myth, Only Paul which is a pen-name for Marcion is real that is one version of one gospel among hundreds that existed in the early church. Reincarnation, Universalism and Theosis were mainstream views.

[@valeriehiginbotham5338]

How could you have someone write to 50 seminaries calming to be prospective students? Isn't that deception/lying?

[@concretesandals4501]

If I was this guy's god, I wouldn't want anyone who works for AIA with me, given how much they lie

[@NancySwass-jv4kp]

Salvation by grace alone, through faith alone, in Jesus alone. That hasnt changed, so, what are you talking about?

[@nathanwhite704]

Thats literally Martin Luther (1483-1546).

[@rajregmi988]

Please make this chanel advertisement free because every time it plays with irritating sounds

[@4nativemedicine60]

Oh my, such great info, why did you not use the True Word of God, the KJV??? I had to stop early because of the biblical references being so very different than God's TRUE Word. Sorry to hear this still has not been studied out by you all.

[@settledown444]

Because everyone knows God spoke to the Bible's authors in 17th century English. 🙂

[@Gek1177]

The KJV isn't even the most accurate of the English translations never mind it being the true word of God. To me KJV only English Chrstian are all about flash and not substance. They like to pretend that the Archaic English is more accurate because it passes the style check and they don't once care about how close the translation is to the original Hebrew and Greek books.

[@drillyourarguments]

KJV-onlyism isnt a practice rooted in Scripture at ALL.

[@4nativemedicine60]

lol. @@drillyourarguments

[@acd1235]

It appears to me a strong presumption to use the term "biblical world view" only to young earth view. Is there a crede in any of the experienced churches that covers the age of the universe? I am not aware. So the church fathers did not care?

[@bobford4484]

Since the classic creeds were composed before the age of the earth was an argument, these creeds do not address the age of the earth. There are other "gaps" as well in these creeds.

[@acd1235]

@@bobford4484 For one there are new creeds that are found in songbooks. I learned one from Joerg Zink in Sunday school. And one would think if it was an urgent topic for the larger denominations, they would create one covering the topic of the age of the world.

[@bobford4484]

@@acd1235 You mentioned "experienced churches" and "church father's" so I wrote about the creeds associated with them. Newer creeds do exist but in my experience most churches who emphasize an old earth of 6,000 years or so do not use creeds but rather publish a "statement of faith" and many of these do mention the age of the earth. I've never seen a creed used in worship that addressed the age of the earth, have you?

[@acd1235]

@@bobford4484 I think I meant "established" churches, not "experienced". Sorry, for the typo.

[@bobford4484]

@@acd1235 Not a problem; I would've given the same answer. Actually "experienced" is just as good a term, I think. 🙂

[@phillise1]

William Lane Craig is not inconsistent, because there is no huge body of evidence contradicting the death and restriction of Christ or Christ's miracles. Most scientists may be materialists, but they can show that miracless are not possible. But there are volumes of evidence contridicting a young earth and a six day creation. Thats why it's only Genesis that's controversial.

[@dadsonworldwide3238]

In my 50 years until more recently it sure looked like athiest was just watch dogs of theistic/ Jewish Naturalist/ materialist. The deterministic physical prescriptions sure seemed like one was there to argue a side when the other feel apart on evolution. Its a very complex history to how the ancient chaldean Babylonian evolutionary primordial soup mythology ends up as the modern American or western world view. It sure wasn't done by a consensus of diplomacy! A very shady past with certain close allys justification for promoting it in direct opposition for reasons other than theory of science.

[@JH-qy8no]

Mere Christianity by C.S. Lewis is a great read for any athiest or Christian. C.S. Lewis was a WW 1 veteran and that experience convinced him there is no God. Until late in his life he asked a simple question in one of his essays that, ironically, lead him to change his mind. He is known as "The reluctant convert." You'll have to read his book to know that question that lead to his slow conversion to Christ.

[@shocksound9]

I don’t believe in any sort of mythology or religion; atheism is just saying “the supernatural doesn’t exist”.

[@dadsonworldwide3238]

Jabberish nilhism . It can't even justify asking itself to deny anything. Atheism wakes up in a car ride or life wanting to live in emotivism standing on high polemical ground that it can't even make the first step to climb

[@dadsonworldwide3238]

The great debate was supposef to settle it all in 1800s everyone agreed we wouldn't have a macro top down alpha omega settle science anymore and allow the fundamental building blocks decide once and for all . But neiche darwin other athiest & theistic naturalist alike didn't get the answers they wanted. So now they lean into the human dashboard biased equations of newton and others that they all once despised. Now they want a classical theory of everything lol Disregard the infinite degree of Freedom yet uniformity, timelessness without liner direction fundamental scales of reality.

[@dadsonworldwide3238]

@@shocksound9 i also deny that the Babylonian primordial evolutionary flood soup creation mythology that math and time is magically woven into the fabric of the universe . I'm not an athiest because I'm self aware of the fact man made time and math that we prescribe ,correlate and plagiarize ourselves.

[@pgpleroux]

Science? Remember at one time all scientists believed that the sun rotated around the earth...

[@Jewonastick]

Remember how the church responded when SCIENCE found out that this was wrong?

[@JB-yb4wn]

The difference is that theists still believe that, science has corrected and moved on.

[@CaptainFantastic222]

Thank you for highlighting the dangers of dogmatic religious belief in comparison with science where no idea is not subject to change and revision based on new evidence

[@pgpleroux]

Check history, it was subjective scientists that responded more than the church! @@Jewonastick

[@pgpleroux]

What is not true?@@sterlingfallsproductions3930

[@ktcarl]

The BioLogos Doctrine places human limitations on God.

[@YoungEarthCreation]

If they took a step back and ignored the theistic version of evolution, they would know they are on the wrong side based on the fact that the God hating atheist team up with them to attack fellow Christian’s

[@JamesRichardWiley]

The Christian worldview is based on a belief that a dead man rose up and saved humanity from eternal damnation at the hands of an angry Hebrew god named Yahweh or something similar which they constantly disagree on.

[@Alexander1312thankyou]

So, it's either we choose to build a worldview on the word of experts and on science today, or we base our worldview on the word of men from 2000 years ago. I know what I'm choosing.

[@drillyourarguments]

The Bible is GOD-inspired. so many fulfilled prophecies, the Bible ACCURATELY predicts the human condition, explains WHO and how the universe was made, and so on.. Jesus loves you, turn to Him before its too late. tomorrow is uncretain.

[@drillyourarguments]

you fail to realize that these 'scientists' are GUESSING history.

[@burnttoast2790]

@@drillyourarguments *The Bible is GOD-inspired.* It _claims_ to be. Doesn't make it true. *so many fulfilled prophecies,* None that can be given that weren't so vague as to be no more valid than a horoscope, and plenty that explicitly failed. In fact, Jesus himself said the generation he addressed (in a discussion of when the endtimes would occur) would still be around to see his return. They're all dead, and he's not back yet. *the Bible ACCURATELY predicts the human condition,* Not so much predict as claim to describe. And if you actually _look_ into that description without the rose-tinted glasses, it's a _nightmare_ of a scenario. This all-powerful being specifically created us all to kiss his rear, made our ancestors _knowing_ they'd do something to provoke his anger (even going so far as to explicitly lie to get them to do it) and blames _us_ for that, and what we have to do now to avoid a fate worse than death is to plead forgiveness to that monster for being born broken. There's a reason y'all have to put so much makeup on that swine, because otherwise one could easily argue that this constitutes ch1ld-abuse. *explains WHO and how the universe was made,* Again, _claims_ to, and doesn't even do that good a job of it. "A magic man done it" is literally the same explanation as _every other_ religion out there, and it doesn't really explain anything at all. One could just as easily say "it just happened" and be no closer to knowing anything about it. *Jesus loves you, turn to Him before its too late. tomorrow is uncretain.* Tomorrow is uncertain, and Heaven isn't guaranteed. Hence why one really shouldn't worry so much about any theoretical afterlife and instead focus on making _this_ life as good for them and those around them as they can. *you fail to realize that these 'scientists' are GUESSING history.* Making _educated_ guesses based on what we've uncovered of things past events have left behind. We can learn a lot more about how the world once was than y'all would like to admit.

[@johnglad5]

There is a third worldview.

[@MagnificoMaltese]

How do we as Christians explain “carbon dating” that science uses as evidence to the age of things they discover? ie: bones, rocks etc

[@annieoaktree6774]

Honest Christians accept the science. Creationists make up all sorts of loony-tunes excuses for ignoring the results they don't like.

[@johnryan6658]

Carbon dating is far from the only form of radiometric dating.

[@YoungEarthCreation]

Check out my last playlist on radiometic dating, I do not specifically take about carbon dating because it how a low limit but I will next video

[@globalcoupledances]

@YoungEarthCreation - U-Pb decay had been proven to be reliable. Faster decay (artificial way) led to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Age of the earth is 4.54 ± 0.05 billion years

[@Username34823]

realize your bible was written by immoral men who wanted power is the first step

[@creatagheorghe9905]

science is about what you can test measure repeat the rest is philosophy and eventually it comes when they start making assumptions even if they can't prove it and they call it science?!?what science is that?

[@shocksound9]

Hi! I’m a trans atheist. Ask me anything.

[@LLAMASinNEED]

Oh the irony

[@kenzeetwo]

The Bible says "Psa_144:3 LORD, what is man, that thou takest knowledge of him! or the son of man, that thou makest account of him”! The sentiment here is the same as in Psa_8:4, though the language is not precisely the same. The word rendered “that thou takest knowledge of him,” means here to take notice of; to regard. The idea is, It is amazing that a being so insignificant as man should be an object of interest to God, or that One so great should pay any attention to him and to his affairs. In Psa_8:4, the language is “that thou art mindful of him,” that is, that thou dost remember him - that thou dost not altogether pass him over. In Psa_8:1-9 the remark is made in view of the heavens as being so exalted in comparison with man, and the wonder is, that in view of worlds so vast occupying the divine attention, and needing the divine care, “man,” so insignificant, does not pass out of his view altogether. Here the remark seems to be made in illustration of the idea that there is no strength in man; that he has no power to accomplish anything of himself; that he is entirely dependent on God.

[@user-nt6cs5lg6d]

Just stick to scripture. That's the best way.

[@Username34823]

remember, its Gods word unless you disagree with it. How often have you donated to charity as Jesus your Slaver God tells you to? its all a sham and you know it

[@pianogal853]

Hugh Ross - it bothers me when he's spotlighted on Christian shows as a scientist. He puts on a good show, but wrong and unbiblical 😔

[@nathanwhite704]

He's literally a phd astrophysicist. How is he not a scientist?

[@godsbeautifulflatearth]

🤔

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

Are you a real flat earther?

[@billcook4768]

That is your chosen world view. Most Christians base their world view primarily on the teachings of Jesus and not the insistence that Genesis be taken literally.

[@Vernon-Chitlen]

While atheists insist life originated in a warm little pond, prebiotic soup or whatever and they are no where near able to demonstrate that it could. They cannot make the elements form a single protein or gene. And the obstacles to making a cell capable of evolving is so humongously beyond their capabilities, even in the exclusive confines of sophisticated laboratories. I recommend the book: The Stairway to Life: An Origin of Life Realty Check by Tan and Stadler.

[@billcook4768]

@@maggiehyder7075 I don’t know how Jesus and the apostles would have taken it. They referred to the Genesis stories, but does that mean they believed them to be literally true? Since they never said, how can we know?

[@Vernon-Chitlen]

@@Moist._Robot Yes, they explain the chemistry required isn't possible in sterile, barren, warm little ponds or prebiotic soup. And chemistry cannot account for the sequencing of only the 20 particular amino acids out of 700 kinds arranged in the hundred of thousands of different proteins. So specific in defining each proteins function and it's ability to fold into their 3D shape. God encourages the science to find how how it did it. Ecc 1:13 And I set my heart to seek and search out by WISDOM, concerning all that is done under heaven. This burdensome task God has given to the sons of man by which they may be exercised.

[@annieoaktree6774]

@@Vernon-Chitlen As always your pointless rambling has nothing to do with biological evolution.

[@Vernon-Chitlen]

@@annieoaktree6774 Your "feelings" aren't facts. No matter how hard you hope, your mother isn't a warm little pond.

[@stevemcclendon9297]

The arguement is between education and blissful ignorance in hopes that someone else will take care of your problems.

[@mikebosler7516]

👍🙏❤️🦕👽

[@christophesutter1844]

Alléluia and amamen 🔥💜🔥

[@marcywilson207]

We know by the Bible that this solar system was created in 6 days approximately 6,000 years ago. We also know that sin came to earth about 6,000 years ago, and it came through an angel who started sin in heaven quite a while before he was cast to this earth. Are you telling me that all the countless angels of God were created 6,000 years ago or that all those angels and the throne of God didn't have a heaven to been before the earth was created? "In the the beginning . . . " doesn't mean the beginning the beginning of God, because God always has been. The angels were created before the earth, and God didn't create the universe through evolution, though all the universe was created by God before He created the world. He doesn't tell us how long it took Him to create the other worlds, but we know there was no death or pain out there, because sin is what brought pain, sorrow and death. God tells us that the fallen angels were cast to this earth. The parable of the one lost sheep teaches us that there are at least 99 just races each living on their world and they need no repentance. Hebrews 1 tells us that Jesus made these other worlds. Isaiah 45:18 For thus saith the LORD that created the heavens; God himself that formed the earth and made it; he hath established it, he created it not in vain, he formed it to be inhabited: I am the LORD; and there is none else. God says the other worlds would be created in vain if they were not inhabited. All these races were created by God through Jesus before our solar system was created during creation week.

[@markmerry1471]

YES THE BIBLE

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

*NO THE BIBLE*

[@markmerry1471]

@@--..-...-..-.--.... Yes and all of it

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

@@markmerry1471 No and none of it

[@markmerry1471]

@@--..-...-..-.--.... that's right but you have to read it to find that out Which I have done and you have not it seems

[@--..-...-..-.--....]

@markmerry1471 Oh, that's what you were trying to say... I've read some of it, but it's too goofy to believe. As a stand-alone book, it's not bad, but to believe it actually happened????? That's just weird

[@dagwould]

1. Why do you guys have this obsession with side view camera shots? Christians are about relationships, aren't they? So the side-view shot breaks the relationship between viewer and speaker. It is very disconcerting to watch. Who's he addressing when he is not looking at the viewer? Good presenters engage the viewer. This production style disengages. 2. An important factor is that 'worldview' transmutes into 'religion'. As Peter Jones teaches, there are only two religions: worship of the creator and worship of the creation. Unfortunately the church has lacked the discernment in many quarters to identify materialist motives in evolutionary ideas, amongst others, and the underlying religious impulse behind these motives.

[@estimatingonediscoveringthree]

There is no microwave background

[@Gek1177]

Actually there is. You can take a picture of it with a radio telescope.

[@estimatingonediscoveringthree]

@@Gek1177 no, you can’t. The origin of the concept was from a erroneous radio telescope that had a perceived signal that was later found to come from the oceans. Look it up. It’s been debunked. Harunie ferris horn

[@estimatingonediscoveringthree]

Herouni antenna proves this.

[@Gek1177]

@@estimatingonediscoveringthree that is false and you should be smart enough to understand that it's been like 70 years since the accidentak discovery and I that time we've built thousands of telescopes that have images the CMBR including several that do it from space. Yoy are lyjng to yourself.

[@annieoaktree6774]

@@estimatingonediscoveringthree I suppose the NASA COBE spacecraft (Cosmic Background Explorer) and the ESA's Planck microwave space observatory were both "erroneous" too. 😄

[@tonygambill990]

You need to go back and re-review the Discovery Institute. They believe in full creation and not evolution. In fact, Stephen Meyer just published a book called “Return of the God Hypothesis” which refutes evolution and upholds creationism. His videos, and others from the Discovery Institute, are all over KZbin.

[@annieoaktree6774]

Meyer has refuted evolution as much as the Flerfers have refuted NASA. 😄

[@globalcoupledances]

Professsor Dave Explains has a playlist Exposing Discovery Institute

[@burnttoast2790]

Funny then that all but a near-forgotten handful of creationists I've had the displeasure of talking to have ultimately admitted to accepting evolution. Even the big-wig institutions like AiG and the Discovery Institute accept it. And before you start with the denial, y'all _need_ macroevolution on who knows how many stimulants to make Noah's flood work as a story.

[@drillyourarguments]

@@annieoaktree6774 you didnt read the book then. Or your athiesm goggles are stapped a bit tight.

[@drillyourarguments]

@@burnttoast2790 examples?

[@clintpospichal6498]

The only evolution I believe in is adaptation (micro evolution)

[@annieoaktree6774]

What stops microevolution from accumulating over time into macroevolution?

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@annieoaktree6774 His ignorance.

[@clintpospichal6498]

@@annieoaktree6774 God prohibits it, no kind can evolve into a new kind, a fish is always a fish

[@annieoaktree6774]

@@clintpospichal6498 "God prohibits it" is not an answer. What is a "kind"? Can all mammals be the same "kind"? How about all eukaryotes?

[@clintpospichal6498]

@@annieoaktree6774 actually it is an answer being God is the Creator and their is no proof of some creature turning into some other creature, it's all guess work in macroevolution no facts

[@MrAuskiwi101]

The far most common myth believed is in a god or gods. Gladly as our knowledge increases the need for nonsensical god claims diminish.

[@drillyourarguments]

Nonsensical evolution claims**

[@MrAuskiwi101]

@drillyourarguments Thanks for letting everyone know that you have no idea about evolution and evidence. There really is no excuse has there is an abundance of information available to you. You are just willfully ignorant.

[@HiddenView1977]

Jesus is my Lord and my savior. He is the Son of God. He is risen. 💯 YEC. See some of you soon at the Marriage Supper. Maranatha ❤️

[@jeff3olsen]

Thank you, Brother! I believe all people are literally children of divine parents. "The Spirit itself beareth witness with our spirit, that we are the children of God: And if children, then heirs; heirs of God, and joint-heirs with Christ; if so be that we suffer with him, that we may be also glorified together." - Romans 8:16-17 "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them." - Gen 1:27 (Interesting that in Hebrew, God is referred to in the plural) "All human beings-male and female-are created in the image of God. Each is a beloved spirit son or daughter of heavenly parents, and, as such, each has a divine nature and destiny. Gender is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose." - The Family Also, to your comments around 32:00, a Nephite prophet mentions "...an account of the creation of the world, and also of Adam and Eve, who were our first parents." - 1 Nephi 5:11

[@njhoepner]

The first time I've ever seen AiG tell the truth (probably an accident). There is a conflict of worldviews involved: the worldview that what we see and observe should be the basis of evidence that we then follow in order to understand the world we live in, vs the worldview that all human knowledge must be crammed into a box made for it in the bronze age by people inventing a religion for themselves who didn't even know what a star is.

[@drillyourarguments]

No not an accident. 10 Commands condemn lying. "the worldview that all human knowledge must be crammed into a box made for it "

[@annieoaktree6774]

@@drillyourarguments _10 Commands condemn lying._ Then why do you and your creationist buddies keep doing it every chance they gat?

[@burnttoast2790]

@@drillyourarguments *No not an accident. 10 Commands condemn lying.* Nope. Well, not like you'd claim. The set of rules y'all call the 10 Commandments consider _perjury_ as something to be condemned. "Thou shall not bear false witness against thy neighbor" reads pretty close to "don't lie in court." *

[@docsavage30]

Is one of the worldview myths that immortal, invisible wizards aren't made up?

[@scottmurray8679]

Thank You AIG for your service to The Lord! I Do Wonder if science is a Fact Why is it that they always say things Like ( It May have been , It could have been and such. Interesting that for most Worldly Science that they use these types of Answers. It reminds Me of a mechanic when you bring your car in to them with a problem and they say ( Well it could be this or maybe that then again it could be something else then they try this and that then something else and two weeks later you get your car back and a bill for a large sum and All that was truly wrong with it was a loose wire . Ok Thanks to You All at Answer In Genius and The Creation Museum for All The Work You Do To Do And Keep The Whole Bibles Truths Up Holding The Word of God From Genesis to Revelation!

[@rclrd1]

How do creationists actually envision the origin of species? Genesis descibes God's creation of the first two humans Adam and Eve. Before this unique event there were, allegedly, no humans at all. Do creationists imagine a similar unique event for each of the seventy million known species: the creation of the first two earthworms, the first two mosquitoes, the first two octopuses, the first two elephants, and so on and on and on for each of the millions of “kinds”?? The mind boggles!

[@estimatingonediscoveringthree]

The sun is a liquid and not a gas

[@annieoaktree6774]

Tin foil hat alert!

[@Jewonastick]

Your skull is probably filled with fluid as well

[@estimatingonediscoveringthree]

@@annieoaktree6774 that’s a great argument…looks like you won. 😂

[@estimatingonediscoveringthree]

@@annieoaktree6774 your either ignorant or a bot

[@Gek1177]

The sun is a liquid... Whoever homeschooled you must have been a few chromosomes short of a set.

[@parkestanley2436]

God is an imaginary friend. You CAN outgrow it!!!

[@TheSaintFrenzy]

I think God is a far better starting point than the BELIEF that NOTHING (which is nothing) created all of this. To me it’s very telling obsessed atheist are with Christianity. Y’all talk more about the faith than many believers. 😆

[@dustinrollings9440]

I know evolution is a trigger word for you, but do you really have to call everything you don't like evolution? There's no such thing as stellar or planetary evolution. Evolution just pertains to life. We know how stars are formed, and it's not through evolution.

[@Prince_Az_Myr]

Stellar evolution is definitely a term, use wikipedia.

[@dustinrollings9440]

@@Prince_Az_Myr Yes, but the lifecycle of stars is almost certainly not what they are talking about in this video, since the assertion AIG makes is that all the stars were created by god at some point a few thousand years ago.

[@drillyourarguments]

we never see any pop. 3 stars. RIP bang big bang.@@dustinrollings9440

[@luish1498]

«Most Common Worldview MYTHS People Fall For» RELIGION!!

[@luish1498]

@@Creekstain WHAT? Are you stoned?

[@luish1498]

@@Creekstain «but no I am not.» but why you believe in stone age myths?

[@luish1498]

@@Creekstain right so stop trying to get other people to swallow your beliefs, stay out of class and let science do the work even if it goes against your beliefs.

[@JB-yb4wn]

@@luish1498 Not to mention the fact that they vote for people to put in legislation based on their laughable beliefs that infringe upon my rights.

[@drillyourarguments]

secular humanism: "hold my beer"