What NASA Discovered In The Sun?

NASA's groundbreaking discoveries about the Sun have unveiled remarkable insights into our closest star, shedding light on phenomena that have puzzled scientists for decades. Through missions like the Parker Solar Probe and the Solar Dynamics Observatory, NASA has delved deep into the Sun's mysteries, revealing its dynamic nature and the intricate processes that drive solar activity.
This video explores the latest findings from NASA's solar missions, highlighting key discoveries such as the detailed observation of solar flares, the uncovering of the Sun's magnetic fields, and the exploration of the solar corona. We delve into how these discoveries impact our understanding of space weather, solar storms, and their effects on Earth's technology and climate.
Join us as we journey into the heart of the Sun, exploring its fiery depths and the powerful forces at play. From the mesmerizing solar winds to the enigmatic coronal mass ejections, this video brings you to the forefront of solar science, showcasing the incredible work of NASA's scientists and the cutting-edge technology that makes these discoveries possible.
Prepare to be amazed by the beauty and power of the Sun, as we uncover the secrets it holds and the new frontiers of knowledge that await us. This is not just a journey into space; it's an exploration of the life-giving star that sustains our very existence. Welcome to a world of discovery, where the mysteries of the Sun unfold before your eyes.

[@Nightscape_]

Pretty crazy to think that I'm just a bunch of particles from the Sun contemplating the Sun.

[@michaelrenouf9173]

Technically you have no particles in your body from our sun. The elements that make up the iron in your blood, the carbon and calcium that make up your body all came from a sun far more massive than our sun. Our true mother died billions of years of go in a violent supernova that created all of the heavier elements that make up everything on our planet and also is what created the nebula to create our sun.

[@anthem4333]

Do you actually believe that?

[@crazycrusher7950]

Gotta love the southerner talking about space. Love your Channel man!

[@NataliaMariaAnastazja]

Thank You so much for this content I love everything about cosmos/space since I was 6-7 years old, I used to look for/seek everything about cosmos/space and I still do and I like to read books and watch documental movies/ programs about cosmos/space, the same with archeology of the ancient Egypt these are my two favourite things to learn about. Hello from Poland 🇵🇱😊

[@rebanelson607]

Amazing images of our star! Thanks for another excellent video!

[@daveyespo]

Great channel! Thank you so much

[@yasindrum99]

thanks it is ur good one

[@alfredodedarc]

How the Universe Works covered this in S3E1. The life of a photon. Starts out as a powerful gamma ray in the sun’s core. It can’t defeat the massive pressure and gravity well immediately and bounces around losing energy, running out of power until it breaks out as a photon a million years later. The light we see today was first created, bounced around like a ping pong ball before the first ancestors of Man emerged. If the photons emerged immediately, they’d hit earth in 9 minutes or so as gamma rays, reducing earth to ash long ago. Thankful for millions of years of photonic traffic jams. This video had a lot of words teaching little new.

[@theunconciousmind7314]

A planet so hot, that u can feel it lightyears away

[@liviochris9838]

amaizing

[@liviochris9838]

brAVO 10+

[@liviochris9838]

PRO

[@charlesbrightman4237]

PERIODIC TABLE OF THE ELEMENTS: Potential completion of the Periodic Table of the Elements: I currently believe that there are 120 chemical elements in this universe. If a person were to look at how electrons fill up the shells in atoms: 2, 8, 18, 32, 32, 18, 8 (seven shells), and realizing that energy could freely flow in this universe if nothing stopped it from doing so, then a natural bell shaped curve might occur. An eighth energy shell might exist with a maximum of two elements in it, chemical element #119 (8s1) and chemical element #120 (8s2). Chemical Element #119 (8s1): #119 I put at the bottom of the Hydrogen group on the Periodic Table of the Elements. It only has one electron in it's outer shell with room for only one more electron. Energy might even enter the atom through the missing electron spot and then at least some of the energy might get trapped inside of the atom under the atom's outer shell. Chemical Element #120 (8s2): #120 I put at the bottom of the Helium group since it's outer shell is full of electrons. It might have some of the properties of group two, Beryllium group (Alkali Earth Metals group) since it has two electrons in it's outer shell; as well as some of the properties of the Helium group (Noble Gases group) since it's outer shell is full of electrons; and if you look at the step down deflection of the semi-metals and where #120 would be located on the chart, it's possible #120 might even have some semi-metal characteristics. #120 would be the heaviest element in this universe. I believe chemical element #120 could possibly be found inside the center of stars. When a neutron split inside of this atom, it would give off one proton, one electron, neutrinos and energy. The proton and electron would be ejected outside of the atom since all their respective areas are full. One proton and one electron are basic hydrogen, of which the Sun is primarily made up of, and the Sun certainly gives off neutrinos and energy. And note, it's the neutron that split, not a proton. So even after the split, there are still 120 protons inside of the atom and the atom still exists as element #120. The star would last longer that way. In addition, if the neutron that split triggered a chain reaction inside of the star, this could possibly be how stars nova, (even if only periodically). If stars were looked at as if this theoretical idea were true, and found to even be somewhat true, then we might just have a better model of the universe to work with, even if it's not totally 100% true. And if it's all 100% true, then all the better. (Except of course for those who might be in the way of a periodic nova or supernova. They might have a no good, very bad, horrible day.)

[@Sebastianmaz615]

Whew!! I wish I could converse about this intelligently with you; right now the only thing I can think of to say is, "okay?" 😀👍🏼 And I did watch the entire video. One thing I've always wondered was why doesn't the entire supply of hydrogen burn up at once? What causes the slow burn of the fuel?

[@charlesbrightman4237]

@@Sebastianmaz615 "One thing I've always wondered was why doesn't the entire supply of hydrogen burn up at once? What causes the slow burn of the fuel?" Consider the following: "IF" my idea is correct concerning chemical element #120, then the proton and electron released from a decomposing neutron would only occur as they occur. Only so much Hydrogen would be released, and therefore only so much Hydrogen could be burned. Purely speculation though on my part.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

@@Sebastianmaz615 Another thought might be: Supposedly the oxygen atom is created also in stars. Maybe there is only so much oxygen in the star that could allow the hydrogen to burn? Pure hydrogen does not burn.

[@juan_matus]

es un proceso termodinámico, todo esta 'controlado' por gravedad y masa ...aunque un día se le acabará el combustible

[@charlesbrightman4237]

@@juan_matus It is a thermodynamic process, everything is 'controlled' by gravity and mass...although one day it will run out of fuel And yet, the way electrons fill up the shells in atoms would suggest and 8th energy shell existing with a maximum of 2 chemical elements in it for a maximum of 120 chemical elements.

[@charlesbrightman4237]

IN THE INTEREST OF FINDING THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING: SOME THINGS MODERN SCIENCE DOES NOT APPARENTLY KNOW: Consider the following: a. Numbers: Modern science does not even know how numbers and certain mathematical constants exist for math to do what math does. (And nobody as of yet has been able to show me how numbers and certain mathematical constants can come from the Standard Model Of Particle Physics). b. Space: Modern science does not even know what 'space' actually is nor how it could actually warp and expand. c. Time: Modern science does not even know what 'time' actually is nor how it could actually warp and vary. d. Gravity: Modern science does not even know what 'gravity' actually is nor how gravity actually does what it appears to do. And for those who claim that 'gravity' is matter warping the fabric of spacetime, see 'b' and 'c' above. e. Speed of Light: 'Speed', distance divided by time, distance being two points in space with space between those two points. But yet, here again, modern science does not even know what space and time actually are that makes up 'speed' and they also claim that space can warp and expand and time can warp and vary, so how could they truly know even what the speed of light actually is that they utilize in many of the formulas? Speed of light should also warp, expand and vary depending upon what space and time it was in. And if the speed of light can warp, expand and vary in space and time, how then do far away astronomical observations actually work that are based upon light and the speed of light that could warp, expand and vary in actual reality? f. Photons: A photon swirls with the 'e' and 'm' energy fields 90 degrees to each other. A photon is also considered massless. What keeps the 'e' and 'm' energy fields together across the vast universe? And why doesn't the momentum of the 'e' and 'm' energy fields as they swirl about not fling them away from the central area of the photon? And electricity is electricity and magnetism is magnetism varying possibly only in energy modality, energy density and energy frequency. Why doesn't the 'e' and 'm' of other photons and of matter basically tear apart a photon going across the vast universe? Also, 'if' a photon actually red shifts, where does the red shifted energy go and why does the photon red shift? And for those who claim space expanding causes a photon to red shift, see 'b' above. Why does radio 'em' (large 'em' waves) have low energy and gamma 'em' (small 'em' waves) have high energy? And for those who say E = hf; see also 'b' and 'c' above. (f = frequency, cycles per second. But modern science claims space can warp and expand and time can warp and vary. If 'space' warps and expands and/or 'time' warps and varies, what does that do to 'E'? And why doesn't 'E' keep space from expanding and time from varying?). g. Energy: Modern science claims that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, it's one of the foundations of physics. Hence, energy is either truly a finite amount and eternally existent, or modern science is wrong. First Law Of Thermodynamics: "Energy can neither be created nor destroyed." How exactly is 'energy' eternally existent? h. Existence and Non-Existence side by side throughout all of eternity. How? * ADDED NOTE: My current TOE idea can potentially answer all of these above items, and more, in a logical, coherent and inter-related manner. And wouldn't one expect the true TOE of existence itself to be able to do that? What other TOE idea in known existence can currently do that? Surely not the General or Special Relativity Models nor even the Standard Model of Particle Physics. TOE Idea: Short version: (currently dependent upon the results of my gravity test): The 'gem' photon is the eternally existent energy unit of this universe. The strong and weak nuclear forces are derivatives of the electromagnetic ('em') interactions between quarks and electrons. The nucleus is a magnetic field boundary. 'Gravity' is a part of electromagnetic radiation, gravity acting 90 degrees to the 'em' modalities, which of course act 90 degrees to each other. 'Gravity' is not matter warping the fabric of spacetime, 'gravity' is a part of spacetime that helps to make up matter. The gravity and 'em' modalities of matter interact with the gravity and 'em' modalities of spacetime and the gravity and 'em' modalities of spacetime interact with the gravity and 'em' modalities of matter. I am open to any and all theory of everything ideas that can potentially answer all those above items in a logical, coherent and inter-related manner. Currently, as far as I am currently aware of, there are no others but my own.

[@michaelbradley5603]

Sketch

[@ray1956]

Who are you space matters 🧐🤨 what’s the narrator NAME. Why hide 😮🤔🤔

[@lilikaramirez1848]

We are sooooo small..if we only realized how irrelevant we are❤