What's the truth about antigravity?

[@JohnBare747]

My favorite t-shirt says "I read a book on Antigravity and couldn't put it down!"

[@ceciliapares2804]

Love it!!😂😂👍👍👍

[@oldmech619]

Time must have flown while reading it

[@XRioteerXBoyX]

@@oldmech619 relatively speaking it did

[@bill392]

I read a book on Gravity but it was heavy reading. I wanted to read a book on Centrifugal force but I never got around to it. I told my class a joke about chemistry but it got a bad reaction.

[@stevenutter3614]

@@bill392 What about the one where you try tripping on acid after they told you your jokes were too basic?

[@noahway13]

The current Dr Don robot is learning, and acting more natural with more fluid movements. It still has a long way to go to seem real.

[@ccole1255]

Yes they're still working on stopping it from doing the robot (dance) long enough to sustain an unedited Fermilab video

[@somebody9825]

nutcase

[@vincecox8376]

OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on KZbin and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity

[@JustOneAsbesto]

If someone actually DID have an antigravity device, they could probably use it to make WAY more than a million euros.

[@AlienScientist]

Lockheed would offer you more than that just to keep your mouth shut!

[@thekaxmax]

@@AlienScientist Lockheed? Any govt would offer you a billion and then put you somewhere safe, just in case.

[@brad3]

2 million euros

[@greenstash]

OR GET RAIDED. John Kenneth Hutchison.

[@JustOneAsbesto]

@@greenstash ya ok

[@jrbleau]

4:45 making anti-electrons or anti-protons is pretty easy... 8:16 antimatter is outrageously hard to make... Hard to make and store in macro quantities.

[@Mysoi123]

😂 well actually, making antimatter is easy but the production are pretty slow. In fact, to make one single gram of anti Hydrogen took 1 billion years assuming continuous operation.

[@thanosfickda]

@@Mysoi123 idk if you joking or not, if its so easy, we would already have few kg of anti matters per year

[@Mysoi123]

@@thanosfickda This is due to the abundance of atoms in a single gram. It is quite feasible to generate antimatter, few atoms at a time.

[@thanosfickda]

@@Mysoi123 then why we don't do more of it? maybe we can't contain it easily?

[@Mysoi123]

@@thanosfickda The second explanation is related to energy conservation. It is likely that we do not have sufficient energy. If one gram of antimatter is converted into energy by allowing it to come into contact with ordinary matter, the resulting power would be equivalent to the detonation of two atomic bombs like those dropped on Hiroshima. This implies that to produce one gram of antimatter, an equivalent amount of energy must be utilized. Hence, this constitutes the second explanation for the slow pace of production. a little mass is a lot of energy E =mc^2 , Einstein famous equation.

[@nowster]

"Scientists have invented an anti-gravity device. It's called a chair." (Attributed to Feynman)

[@troeteimarsch]

made my day!

[@Karolpa1138]

But what about....ladders and elevators?

[@troeteimarsch]

@@Karolpa1138 they're factor x more powerful, u're right xD

[@ebnftl2272]

Good one! 👏👍

[@d4v0r_x]

right up there with the device to pass trough walls: a door

[@jerrymiller276]

When my daughter was very young, the first time she saw a helium balloon she asked, "fall up?"

[@Ed-quadF]

Shel Siverstein wrote a book about that.

[@_Nibi]

@Elijah how? She was wrong

[@aliservan7188]

OMG Adorable! I don't have kids but I'd have been so proud!

[@lolcano2346]

@@_Nibi because she's taking concepts she's already familiar with to be curious and critical about the physical world around her You're an idiot who probably struggles to understand people

[@_Nibi]

@@lolcano2346 seems like it was an incident that is completely unrelated to intelligence. It’s just kids being kids. No need for your immature ad hominem.

[@gregchambers6100]

"A lie will get half way around the world before the truth gets its pants on." Mark Twain.

[@Eowyn3Pride]

✌thank you Mr. Twain!😘

[@mariusgrobler]

My dear mother taught that a lie comes on horseback and the truth on foot. She grew up a long time ago...

[@Eowyn3Pride]

@@mariusgrobler lies come easily, the truth has endurance...

[@MiccaPhone]

The lie about antogravity by rotating discs even got around the world more than just once.

[@somebody9825]

nutcase

[@rschiwal]

My mother told me that when she was in grade school they taught her that it would be impossible to fly to the moon because by the time you loaded an airplane with enough fuel and supplies, you couldn't get it off the ground.

[@LeeStoneman]

And that is why her teachers only managed to get as high a Grade School. They were clearly not very clever.

[@patriciajrs46]

Why is it that people are so ready to argue the stories about putting a man, and his spacecraft, on the moon? They claim it never happened and it was all tricks of the government with cameras and secret locations.

[@Baalaaxa]

Well, her teachers were kinda correct on that one. It would be impossible to fly to the moon with an airplane, no matter how much fuel and supplies you would load it with. But with a spacecraft, and a sufficiently efficient rocket engine, well, it's a different story.

[@DoreVibe]

@@Baalaaxa I believe that was the entire point. At that point in history, we didn't have enough understanding of the tech that eventually got us to the moon. Anti-gravity hasn't been understood enough to build a craft in mass, "publicly".

[@weqe2278]

Which is why they had to stage the landing.... :-)

[@Pspersonal-bp8by]

@6:54 Dr. Don: "And this is a big but." Sir Mixalot: *enrolls in particle physics classes*

[@Kabup2]

big butt?

[@portuguesepossum3165]

🤣🤣🤣

[@kenlieck7756]

And that, my friends, is a prime example of antigravitas...

[@scienceisall2632]

@@kenlieck7756 haha

[@Ted...youtubee]

I read a small booklet on LASERS. It was light reading.

[@will2see]

Forget Carl Sagan's quote, I have a better one: "Extraordinary groupthink leads to extraordinary ignorance" - Avi Loeb

[@JCO2002]

With all due respect, Avi Loeb is nothing but a headline-hunting, click-bait huckster.

[@will2see]

@@JCO2002 Not at all!

[@TheChzoronzon]

Almost any quote is better than that crap. Claims require (good) evidence, full stop. "Extraordinaire claims" reeks of prejudgement, and "extraordinaire evidence" suggest there are two kinds of evidence, passable and the luxe... pffft I never understood why that silly, elitist, cheap quote gets so much spread. Stop, please.

[@will2see]

@@TheChzoronzon I totally agree.

[@Tim3.14]

The reason a claim that contradicts well-established theory is considered "extraordinary" is because the well-established theory is already supported by copious evidence. And thus the extraordinary claim needs extraordinary evidence to overcome all the evidence against it. In other words, claims about the physical world aren't evaluated in a vacuum. They're evaluated in the context of what we already know about how the world works.

[@marthinusdawidvanrooyen2508]

"Making anitmatter is pretty easy" What a time to be alive.

[@roberttapper3296]

Not for long if alot of anti matter mixes with regular matter

[@MrDogonjon]

Anti matter is anti time as well. Matter causes time dilation so anti mater uncauses time dilation making matter not matter any more. anti matter will push against the force acting on it providing the opposite impulse. Push it forward it goes backwards in spasce and time. then it's hard to find it because it is behind you in the past..

[@vadinhopsc]

If you have a Large Hadron Collider in the basement, it is indeed easy. Remember that if you make even just ONE positron it IS antimatter. Now, to get half a kilogram of antimatter is another story.

[@livefully7568]

so when one blows an object up it's hard to find in space and time.. gotcha

[@adultsasukesolosakatsuki5k409]

Honestly No nothing special, it would be better times to be alive with no cover up and holding back technology

[@TheGreatest1974]

In January 1989 I saw a disc float over my cottage in Scotland. It was going very slowly and there was nothing holding it up. It was also very low- only about 60 feet up. It was making a low humming sound, it had a series of circular red lights around the base facing downwards. There was no wind from it, it had no wings, no jets, no rotors, nothing. It should have fallen out of the sky. Whatever was keeping it up, wasn’t ‘silly’ but very effective, and very real.

[@michalwojcik9106]

He is closed minded scientist like others, pitty because i like other videos

[@stestar09]

He's a need to see the evidence type person , You are lucky enough to have seen that , many others haven't & still believe, for you its confirmed , whether others believe you or not is not as important, you have confirmation. I envy you in some ways as i know that since we are here , why can't others be in the universe? We are here from practically nothing, but having our conditions just right ✅️ there must be other galaxies with a similar life bearing planet , possibly far more further along its evolutionary path than ours is , for all we know - that disc you saw back in 1989 could have been something as simple as a guided tour of our highlands - from another planet , we do it when we take trips away , why can't they ?

[@TheGreatest1974]

@@stestar09 true. I do know what I saw, but it was a craft defying gravity- I didn’t see aliens. But my own opinion is that it wasn’t made by us- not in 1989. That would mean the military having cracked anti gravity 33 years ago at least, and never used it nor admitted to having it. Possible, but unlikely. Tech always runs downhill from the military, slowly but surely. You’d imagine some new tech associated with it would’ve come down to us by now. Thanks for commenting. 👍🇬🇧

[@tastyfrzz1]

Saw something like that in Moorhead,MN in 1978. There were nukes there at the time so it figures that they were there.

[@XZb9x2129asjfCkV]

Are you sure there was no wind? Because that craft was that shape for a reason. The flying saucer shape creates a lot of lift but also has little air resistance.

[@rsauder]

"What goes up must come down.". Nope, not true. Once you hit 11km/s you ain't ever coming down- ever.

[@tda.thedevilsadvocate]

Espace velocity doesn't defie gravity, it just works on the gravity principles, it's not like you beat gravity :p

[@arcanewyrm6295]

@@tda.thedevilsadvocate Agreed. To "defy" gravity would be to demonstrate an absence of being affected by gravity in any way, while achieving escape velocity is to simply overcome gravity's effect - not eliminate it.

[@420snoogins]

I've fallen up the stairs, more than a few times. Proof of anti-gravity.

[@wictimovgovonca320]

Is that you Joe?

[@josephcoon5809]

@@wictimovgovonca320 😂 Beat me to it.

[@sarielreigns777]

Joe Biden ✊😂😂🤣

[@joesguiltyguitar]

That's well said lol

[@brokentombot]

Biden suffers from antigravity then.

[@darimshamsi2329]

Hey! Dr.Don is back to rock on!!

[@Ni999]

@Z3U5 Dark energy would like to know your location. (Pardon the stale meme style.)

[@danuttall]

Same great presentation style. I still miss seeing the bookcase in the background.

[@Aufenthalt]

The Don is on! Feel the Don!

[@418cjpaul]

I'm really glad Dr. Lincoln was able to understand my explaining this to him.

[@sebaufiend]

I am reminded of a paper I once saw where they theorized gravity has a "charge", where all normal matter has the same charge and all anti matter has the opposite charge. So all matter is attracted to matter, and all matter is pushed away by anti matter. The paper I think made a claim about how if this were true, the spontaneous production of electron-positron pairs could actually explain some dark matter behavior. It's been a long time since I read it.

[@earthalienzapa3237]

Like trying make windup car go up hills if could will windup again going down.

[@jackietate4047]

"Like explaining how UFO's fly. Which is kind of silly". I guess this guy missed the memo that the government is now admitting that UFO's (uap's) are real.

[@Trainer_Orange]

Oh so now you believe the government ;)

[@ThomasJr]

you are an idiot, you shouldn't even be watching this channel, it's not for amateurs

[@ThomasJr]

@@Trainer_Orange lol

[@NovaStrike118]

Yes UFOs exist. No they do not use antigravity because as mentioned, it is silly. lol If they use some advanced technology to fly, it's most likely something we don't know about yet, and antigravity is just stupid because how would you even control it? It'll always either push you up or pull you down, and if you theoretically have the same amount of matter as antimatter in your ship... how would you connect them? Surprise surprise, anti matter annihilates with any matter it touches. NOT TO MENTION: If the ship was made out of antimatter, it'd continuously be touching the air which would ALSO annihilate it.

[@SirHiggalot]

They admitted they're real videos, that's about it.

[@Willaev]

"I say 'prove it'" Richard Feynman: "You can never prove that you're right you can only prove that you're wrong."

[@michaeljames5936]

Feynman said that? ... Prove it!

[@Ghostrider-ul7xn]

Feynman also said : Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.

[@l0_0l45]

I think "proof" was said here in the colloquial sense. Asking for *evidence* in this case was the appropriate word.

[@awesomedata8973]

But it wasn't "Carl Sagan" who said that, so it doesn't count. Besides, (massive mountains) of 'evidence' isn't the same as 'proof' to this guy. Yet it seems to work well enough to 'prove' things in the court of law. So go figure. :P Truth is owned by this dude -- and this dude alone. He is a 'real' scientist doing 'real' science (on KZbin) after all! -- He is judge, jury, and executioner when it comes down to truth! -- Even if you've seen one, if you can't prove UFOs exist, you are simply delusional! -- You'll _never_ convince him UFOs are real!!! -- Or so he says. lol

[@fnamelname9077]

But how can you know that you're right, that you're wrong?

[@berlinlooks]

It doesn’t add anything to the discussion but for the sake of KZbin algorithms I will comment: brilliant video! Thank you as always 🙏🏻

[@iStormUK]

I subscribed so long ago, Don had just got his PhD, been hooked ever since. ;) Seriously though, my days are happier now you're back in person :D

[@ufotv-viral]

👽👍👍

[@georgewashington90]

When you want to talk about anti gravity , the first you should define anti gravity. The answer whether it exists or not depends on definition of anti gravity.

[@rorytaylor1202]

Yes i was thinking that too, no mention of time and space, dilation or lensing effects. Personally i think the vacumn acts like negative mass not matter.

[@David35687]

These dumbasses can’t even fit gravity into the standard model of physics. However I will to give them credit for exposing the muon anomaly and the opening the door to the possibility of a fifth fundamental force in physics. Now if they could only figure out why the heat level in the suns corona can be as high as 6000 times greater than the temperature of the surface of the sun. Is it a low energy nuclear reaction or is it a hydrogen to hydrino conversion ala brilliant light power? Because without the high pressure that exists in the center of the sun, coronal heat cannot be due to be standard fusion.

[@David35687]

@@scififan698 Does anybody out there have an opinion on the coronal heating anomaly. Apparently NASA thought it was important enough to send up the Parker probe a couple years ago to fly thru the Sun’s corona.

[@mikagitzinger369]

UFO's travel beyond space or time and sometimes unmanned...Quantum entanglement. Ufo's have their own gravity field. Ufo's, work with extreme highly advanced electro magnetic propulsion technology. Once they maintain own gravity field, they can bend space- time and light around their craft, making it automatically invisible. They are traveling through other dimensions beyond space time, and therefore we can only observe them, when they enter the solid 3rd dimension.

[@carlwillows]

The best explanation of gravity I've understood is that it is a result of space/time and mass. Anti-gravity would be analogous to anti-time.

[@Calikid331]

I agree. Since gravity slows down time, it's possible that anti-gravity speeds it up, or makes it flow in reverse. If we could somehow get time to flow faster in a confined area I think that would create an anti-gravity effect.

[@robertstrong6639]

That's right, time causes gravity, perhaps way in the future we could have something called "temporal dampeners" that wouldn't negate gravity just delay it into the future, like a shortcut. On Star Trek the ships have "Inertia dampeners" It delays inertia.

[@mikagitzinger369]

UFO's travel beyond space or time and sometimes unmanned...Quantum entanglement. Ufo's have their own gravity field. Ufo's, work with extreme highly advanced electro magnetic propulsion technology. Once they maintain own gravity field, they can bend space- time and light around their craft, making it automatically invisible. They are traveling through other dimensions beyond space time, and therefore we can only observe them, when they enter the solid 3rd dimension.

[@Virgilvega-kw9nm]

I don’t think this representative from fermi lab did his home work with regards to the the published papers published by NASA Physicist at Univ of Alabama-> Ning Li, who’s papers claimed a practical way to Produce anti-gravity effects (1991, 1993) creating down “gravitomagnetic field perpendicular to their spin axis.” She wrote “if a large number of ions could be aligned, (in a Bose-Einstein condensate) the resulting effect would be a very strong gravitomagnetic field producing a strong repulsive force.” The alignment may be possible by trapping superconductive ions in a lattice structure in a high-temperature superconducting disc. Her claim of having functional anti-gravity devices was cited by the popular press and in popular science magazines with some enthusiasm at the time. “In 1997 Li published a paper stating that recent exponents reported anomalous weight changes 0.05-2.1% for a test mass suspended above a rotating superconductor. Although the same paper describes another experiment that showed the gravitational effect on a non rotating superconductor was very small, if any effect existed at all.” ->very cool. Your big Black T-shirt and cheeses little video cut pieces from old flying saucer movies --> marks you a defender of Huburis. You should not be allowed to represent Femi Lab, please sit down.

[@mikagitzinger369]

UFO's travel beyond space or time and sometimes unmanned...Quantum entanglement. Ufo's have their own gravity field. Ufo's, work with extreme highly advanced electro magnetic propulsion technology. Once they maintain own gravity field, they can bend space- time and light around their craft, making it automatically invisible. They are traveling through other dimensions beyond space time, and therefore we can only observe them, when they enter the solid 3rd dimension.

[@squatch545]

Exactly. This guy is a disinformation specialist. Scientists are being killed over this research because it's worth billions if realized.

[@naedanger123]

That just sounds like electromagnetism with extra steps

[@dsracoon]

The real secret of Area 51 is that the real saucy stuff is in Area 52 where no one suspects it.

[@AKGuerilla]

Area 52 is where the peons that don't rank high enough to work in Area 69 work.

[@dillongarner1]

Site 4

[@TheThansen669]

@pinpoint45 Nonsense. If the UAE craft are real and demonstrate the kind of maneuver capability described by eyewitness accounts they are not stealth and likely do not use any form of kinetic propulsion. If real, whatever is allowing that type of instantaneous acceleration while ignoring basic principles of flight is radically advanced...well beyond even the most advanced prototype craft any nation has developed. It is likely a difference in technology level between a campfire and a nuclear reactor, literally thousands of years ahead of where we are right now. Though you may be right about it being a drone, if any human pilot were in one when it took off with such instant acceleration their body would be abstract art on cockpit wall.

[@hobohistorian4732]

You have no I dea.how much this statement is understated.

[@hobohistorian4732]

@@TheThansen669 maybe up to 17Gs before the craft itself begins to fail structurally. These craft are pulling 600Gs.

[@manavmnair6975]

Lets all be honest. Without Dr Don, Fermilab is just like any other KZbin channel

[@Eyes-of-Horus]

Many years ago I met a guy who was looking for funding for inventors with interesting ideas. He showed me an 8 mm film an inventor made that was quite interesting. This inventor was playing around with a microwave antenna. He was going through different frequencies and when he got to a specific frequency a paper plate on the other side of the room jumped up. He started playing around with that frequency and found he could cause things to jump and even float. He had a heavy metal chock with a pointed end. He aimed the antenna at it and was able to make it stand up on its end. It was pretty heavy and couldn't get it to float. He also aimed it at a metal file and the file broke in half. When he filmed aiming it at a metal file in the dark the area where it aimed got red hot and snapped in half. There was no way this could have been CGI because it was film and it was before CGI or even computers were even available to the public. So, if someone is still interested in anti-gravity, there is an approach.

[@VndNvwYvvSvv]

Gravity and time damping are real concepts according to leading theories, but those hoax videos are pretty common. You can also edit anything digitally and then produce film of it.

[@devvvvvvvvvvvv]

this is a fake story

[@ET_AYY_LMAO]

Thats not anti-gravity thats just someone playing with microwave magnetrons.

[@felipelopes3171]

Hi Dr. Don, isn't there also an argument that antimatter should fall down because of CPT symmetry? It would be a striking result if it falls up.

[@davidwelner9994]

He was right in saying it is as simple as whether Einstein’s Equivalency Principle also applies to anti-matter. Better way to consider it at this stage.

[@TonyP9279]

What you need is some good ol' Element 115.

[@omniking3479]

He conveniently left that out...

[@masonmax1000]

exactly to bad we are to stupid to recreate a stable version of the element

[@eneresolong]

Apparently it's silly when Bob Lazar says the exact same things as him about anti gravity and unstable elements/antimatter drives...guess it's silly because 1990?

[@eneresolong]

So that's what dunning Krueger looks like when a genius experiences it.

[@Jordan-cr6rh]

what is element 115

[@ryokohakubi2928]

ScientiaCras2 12 hours ago (edited) That Fermilab video won't age well.

[@peterkelley6344]

Prediction: You and Matt O'Dodd of PBS's Space/Time will become parallel presentations to each other. Hope you continue these discussions. It was super fun dive into the subject. Keep up the discussion.

[@jaymiewilliamson2521]

Making fun of someone doesn't prove anything

[@hrlincoln9873]

A Fermilab video on Antigravity? I'm literally floating!

[@aniksamiurrahman6365]

Maybe they all float down there.

[@SquirrelASMR]

Ohh you... 😂

[@IAOIceland1984]

You're falling, just upwards

[@erics.4113]

@@aniksamiurrahman6365 🎈

[@michaelcharlesthearchangel]

Why all the ad hominem? If these guys "no it all" then how come they don't know it al☆l?

[@Squgglebum]

Love how at the beginning of the video the idea of anti-gravity is not even considered real, yet as the video goes on, almost everything ‘anti’ at places like CERN is completely accepted.

[@LarryFleetwood8675]

Anti-gravity is indeed real and mainstream science knows it very well too, there's just a complete blackout on this subject in MSM ordered from the top of government in I'd imagine pretty much all nations on Earth, which is why you always hear scientists denying its existence. Without them o board and the alrwady corrupt MSM, it'd likely not be possible to maintain the cover-up as it has been for so many decades now. The reason is simple; it's literally earth-shattering news if they revealed its reality especially damaging to the oil industry which is how all infrastructure is based. Fossil fuel is also how the powers-that-be keep their stranglehold control on the entire world, so free energy/anti-gravity is kept under lid in black budget program. Basically, when NASA sends up their obsolete propulsion rockets they're stalling this thing.

[@danadevoe7962]

Since we don't have a firm understanding of gravity, I always find it interesting when people like this guy dictate what is possible and what is not. I believe such blind skepticism will not lead us to the future we want. When experimental results disagree with theory, the theory is probably wrong. I have seen people dismiss experimental results because they disagree with theory and refuse to attempt to replicate the experiment. When they do attempt to replicate the experiment they will not replicate correctly.

[@skybellau]

@@danadevoe7962 I agree, we should be sceptical of our scepticism. But nothing he said "dictated" otherwise. ???

[@garylacoursiere4413]

Anything that can be replicated by other scientists is completely accepted, that's how science works. You can postulate anything you want - it may not be provable yet (like anti-gravity), but that doesn't mean we can't investigate it. When he says something isn't real (like some anti-gravity claims), it's because it's been dis-proven. That means that different scientific teams have tried to replicate it using the claimant's setup, and it doesn't work. Again, that's how science works.

[@LarryFleetwood8675]

@@garylacoursiere4413 Yet, they lied...why doesn't that possibility even occur to you. An advanced technology is being protected here, most likely on some international agreement keeping it secret to the public thus keeping the status quo of today's energy sources. Obviously this advanced technology is real, since many of us have actually seen craft in the night sky that defy the officially known means of transportation. I.e., free energy/zero point energy is a reality, the problem is proving it which is the difficult part when there obviously is this secrecy surrounding its existence, aided by MSM coorporation.

[@maninashed9367]

Gotta be real, ask the US navy how those UAP's they repeatedly film, do what they do 🤷🏻‍♂️

[@baits9301]

UAP'S JUST LOVE AMERICA SO MUSH THAT PILOT AND POLICE HAVE SEEN THEM , EVEN LAND AND TAKE OFF , TELL THE PUBLIC IT'S ALIEN TECHNOLOGY WHEN IT'S ACTUALLY OUR OWN .

[@NoflectioN]

@@baits9301 so your saying we already have antigravity tech? Aliens keeping tabs on us sounds more believable

[@DomV123]

Superconductors

[@MiccaPhone]

@@DomV123 They do not make antigravity, but congrats for spelling that word correctly, it shows you are really smart.

[@DomV123]

@@MiccaPhone Wow looking at your post history I can tell you are a negative person, I literally posted one word. But hey whatever keeps your big ego happy.

[@v_sign]

Never underestimate the unknown, Fermilab. Once in a while it is precisely someone from this peculiar group of freethinkers who paves the way for a new invention. So a little more respect please for the freethinkers among us.

[@Calikid331]

This! I hate that science can sometimes feel cult-like. If you don't think the same way they do, or if you challenge long established theories or concepts they will ridicule you, just like they did Einstein.

[@skywatcher369]

💯💯💯x 20. 👉👆👈, ✌. 🌀⚡🌀x4,\ x6=🛸. I hope I'm not being too obvious. Your statement is very correct.

[@alexandernahan6768]

cope

[@pbp6741]

I really wanted that spaceship to fall straight down and have the cartoony halos and birdies upon the doctor saying “... which is ... kinda silly.”

[@bryanvanwagner3936]

Just for clarity... "Antigravity" blocks the force of gravity while "countergravity" creates an opposition to the force of gravity. Two different things.

[@josephgdangelo9807]

Ya however to create anti gravity one would need to some how change the atoms mass into energy. This wouldn't really even be antigravity but again a canceling out of gravity. Just differently than producing counter gravity. Technically you might be able to do that someway. Not sure how. But if you could force the atoms out of their Asymmetrical States into symmetrical states. However such a modification would change the very atoms we are speaking about into massless quantum particles. In which they would most likely just fly away from each other.

[@Geralt--of--Rivia]

Scientists used to think air travel and reaching space weren't possible and look what happened. Nobody knows for certain what breakthroughs and technologies we'll have a 1000, 100 or even 50 years from now. Some humility wouldn't hurt.

[@danmoretti8898]

Yeah no shit. This channel is the epitome of 'well ackshully' scientism, and unfortunately for us on KZbin, appears to be one of the few things that Fermilab actually has going for it.

[@melodies92]

Exactly! Thank you!

[@jerrypolverino6025]

Not all scientists. Science is dynamic. It changes as we learn. But! No matter how much research we throw at a subject we can’t change the laws of physics.

[@Boogaboioringale]

Absolutely no reason antimatter should fall up. But the funding sure comes in handy.

[@Boogaboioringale]

Prior lack of knowledge is no excuse for being stupid today

[@astralfields1696]

First of all, no mention of why you think the claim (supported by high level witnesses) that the US has crashed UFOs is wrong. If you haven't got the memo yet, we are way past making fun of this subject.

[@oliverwilcox2605]

its the stigma purposefully made after project bluebook was created (there is documents about this). All mainstream "scientists" will think this due to herd mentality, they dont even realise physics is dying, quantum gravity and multiverse theory is just an excuse for the lack of understanding in quantum physics... look at the lack of development in physics in recent years.

[@remsmith3233]

Thanks Dr. Don for getting “science “ out there in the public.

[@mathunt1130]

I wrote a paper on the interaction of gravity and electrically insulating fluids. It turns out that you can use the electric field to make the fluid adhere to an upper surface which I think is quite nice. You can do the same with a magnetic field as well but I haven't worked out the details.

[@chicxulub2947]

can you magnetically levitate freely?

[@mathunt1130]

@@chicxulub2947 It has to be on an upper surface.

[@bloodbucket2847]

Check on the military “TR-3B” triangle spy plane (supposedly anti-gravity). It uses liquid mercury spinning around large magnets, I guess it puts itself in a vacuum? or something like quantum locking? Idk much but it seems interesting. There is a patent number for the TR-3B prob in depth if that info might help you.

[@ChristAliveForevermore]

How strong is the adherence?

[@mathunt1130]

@@ChristAliveForevermore it depends on the wave number.

[@dporangecounty]

What about Dark Energy? Doesn’t that have an anti-gravity effect? I was expecting to hear that covered in this video.

[@timugiwara]

Dark energy is causing the expansion of the universe / space-time, that’s not the same as a force that repels mass...

[@ets9191]

It’s more like Dark energy exhibits negative pressure which result in a propulsive force. It’s not anti gravity and it is hypothetical as hell.

[@Posesso]

I think the key difference is that Dark Energy is not suffering anti-gravity, it is exerting it on the surrounding matter. It pushes away what is around it via negative pressure, but itself is not moving anywhere, neither in an antigravity fashion. A bit like an engine of an elevator is not suffering anti-gravity just by going in the opposite direction from gravity when going up. The example/analagy sucks, but maybe is sufficiently correct and helps.

[@scienceisall2632]

@@timugiwara The less mass present, the more effect the dark energy has. The two are interlinked

[@nic.h]

@@timugiwara isn't dark energy the name given to the unknown cause responsible for the "acceleration" in the expansion of the universe. The acceleration being key in that description

[@trufom6926]

For a guy who doesn't know all the answers, he is really sure of himself. History is filled with scientists who were dead wrong. He may be one of them someday.

[@patriciajrs46]

I like that idea.

[@super66craig]

Ironically in the year of Einstein's enlightenment he penned equations and theories that not one scientist agreed with for decades. The quantum entanglement, relativity, photons in coherent light. Even he didnt believe yet it was right. Now we have identified and are quantifying gravity waves with singularity to be soon discovered if the insane woke left didn't end the world first.

[@Che_mo80]

The science of today is not the science of tomorrow. Scientists hate to admit that they don't even know 1% of the secrets of the universe but claim they know it all.

[@Vectorized_mind]

​@@patriciajrs46He's been proven wrong,The US GOVERNMENT came out and said they have CAPTURED UFOs and the non-human biologicals that were inside the crafts.

[@simonzinc-trumpetharris852]

The man works at Fermilab. I think he knows a helluva lot more than you do.

[@mak675]

A blacksmith friend of mine and I were discussing exotic physics the other day....and considered gravity propagating through the fabric of space as a wave.....what would happen if you could produce an opposing wave......would it counter the force like nullification of sound by producing a counter wave, like the headphones that counter sound.......or am I way off base?

[@GMATTOEFLSATGRECOACH]

If you amplify that wave within matter (small/atomic gravitational wave, that is), you have the anti-gravitational wave that can counteract the Big/Interplanetary gravitational waves much like when Moses used his magic stick (received from aliens?) to divide the Red Sea into two pieces temporarily, so that the jews could pass it on foot.

[@mikagitzinger369]

UFO's travel beyond space or time and sometimes unmanned...Quantum entanglement. Ufo's have their own gravity field. Ufo's, work with extreme highly advanced electro magnetic propulsion technology. Once they maintain own gravity field, they can bend space- time and light around their craft, making it automatically invisible. They are traveling through other dimensions beyond space time, and therefore we can only observe them, when they enter the solid 3rd dimension.

[@entropiauniverseflyovermob4181]

I always learn something from the team at Fermilab. I like it in this video when he said "This is real science". Ive let go of my old ideas and am trying to build new ideas off the real science. Such an adventure. Thanks for letting us join you on this quest.

[@stevenhauth9753]

There is a patent for a device that can reduce gravity's effects here on Earth up to 87% so if this guy really knows what he's talking about you should Google this anti-gravity device and maybe learn something.

[@alice_in_wonderland42]

@@stevenhauth9753 anyone can patent anything, I can patent a device which converts bullshit into gold

[@marketsocialist6421]

So have you?

[@ronaldmorrison2765]

@@alice_in_wonderland42 Sorry, some of the "news" outlets have that patented and monetized already.

[@brucesoehngen852]

Science is a process that is never absolute. Wait and see. The proof is out there.

[@karelknightmare6712]

If antimatter falls up wouldn't it be a good explaination for its rareness (no antistars colliding with stars in gigantic annihilations) even though it's supposed to have been produced in equal amounts after the big bang?

[@abekane7038]

It could also be dark energy and/or dark matter, if it repels matter/matter repels it

[@MrDogonjon]

matter can not be created or destroyed... can anti matter be destroyed?

[@karelknightmare6712]

@@MrDogonjon actually matter and antimatter can be created and annihilated from and into photons which are their own antiparticle and do not experience time. Quite mind bending right?

[@chrisS19019]

It wasn’t though. Of course. Go check the findings

[@karelknightmare6712]

@@chrisS19019 sorry, what wasn’t what?

[@SuccessMMA]

Please do a video explaining how the "tic tacs" on the Pentagon videos of UAP are capable of their movement.

[@mikagitzinger369]

UFO's travel beyond space or time and sometimes unmanned...Quantum entanglement. Ufo's have their own gravity field. Ufo's, work with extreme highly advanced electro magnetic propulsion technology. Once they maintain own gravity field, they can bend space- time and light around their craft, making it automatically invisible. They are traveling through other dimensions beyond space time, and therefore we can only observe them, when they enter the solid 3rd dimension.

[@TheOzarkExplorer]

Well, you did a fine job of dismissing the experiments others have worked on, like Ning Li and Podkletnov, but you didn't even touch on the tech used in those UFOs videos we've been seeing from the U.S. military. You offered nothing at all that explains those. I am no physicist but I can't completely dismiss the observations those two and others have offered that have been researching in this field. The truth is what we don't know is still far greater than what we do know and hubris has always stood in the way of understanding what we don't know.

[@jacksavage4098]

Never say never. What is impossible today may be the 'norm' tomorrow.

[@valentinmalinov8424]

You are correct! Gravity is explained in the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

[@SaveTheFuture]

Here's a paper with some solid experimental data on reactionless thrust: "Electrostatic accelerated electrons within symmetric capacitors during field emission condition events exert bidirectional propellant-less thrust". Check it out.

[@nicholaskelly6375]

Remember If an eminent scientist says that something "Is Impossible" Then they are probably wrong. However if the same eminent scientist says that something "Is improbable" Then they are probably right.

[@PenguinSage]

@@nicholaskelly6375 We are in good company then, because this video says ant-gravity is improbable, but would be really cool to have. I have the same stance on several other physics questions. FTL travel? Probably not, but very useful if you do, but time travel? Unless the universe has some way to resolve paradoxes, no. Makes for great fiction though 😀.

[@nicholaskelly6375]

@@PenguinSage I fully concur I love science fiction and hope that a lot more will come to pass!

[@85gbody97]

I love how he says”how ufos fly which is silly” really so why do we have actual military defense video of flying craft with no visible signs of propulsion also have no wings nor any propellers so just cause human scientist haven’t made anything that we can consider antigravity it’s gotta be false.

[@thekaxmax]

They have been either explained or debunked as craft. So, no

[@irakaye1]

Guys like him are professional debunkers. He doesn’t do the research it is just easier for him to make his snarky comments. I’m shocked that so many are just like him. A huge majority of Americans believe that UFOs are real. Especially with all the video that you refer to from DOD.

[@85gbody97]

@@thekaxmax ya clearly don’t watch the news. They have not been explained nor debunked. These videos just came out the newest showing a craft fly then go into the water then later fly out of the water. We do not have anything like that not the technology to make something that can fly and be submerged in water. An ya can’t expect them to land on the White House lawn as they may not understand our archaic form of governing others to grasp that they need to contact them not to mention if they ever got close they would start firing on them. Your the type that won’t believe until they shove a probe up your ass.

[@rickbanister2018]

My working theory is that the ridiculous ballistics of UFO's are because what you observe is really a projection, not the craft itself. Like cat lasers. I don't have any idea of where the projections originate... from the Mother Ship just screwing with pilots?

[@ULTRAJSK]

Anti gravity

[@off-roadingexplained8417]

"Explaining how UFOs fly, is kind of silly?". Yet it's being discussed in congressional hearings.

[@CrazexSteve]

Don’t worry it makes us all sad! You’re not alone 😭

[@mikagitzinger369]

UFO's travel beyond space or time and sometimes unmanned...Quantum entanglement. Ufo's have their own gravity field. Ufo's, work with extreme highly advanced electro magnetic propulsion technology. Once they maintain own gravity field, they can bend space- time and light around their craft, making it automatically invisible. They are traveling through other dimensions beyond space time, and therefore we can only observe them, when they enter the solid 3rd dimension.

[@frankdelucey2137]

Humans can't fly Airplane : hold my beer You can't build a nuclear reactor at home. Radioactive boy scout: hold my beer General relativity is all there is Quantum mechanics: hold my beer You can't make micro black holes on earth. Cern: hold my beer We will never see anti-gravity in action UFO's: hold my beer Darpa: Take the money and we will give you beer!

[@muninrob]

When I went to the VA Beach Military Aviation Museum during the late 90's, they had a "captured", "alien", Flying Saucer on display. Avro VZ-9 Avrocar, seized while crossing the Canadian border - making it both "captured", and while in the US, "alien", and it was definitely a flying saucer, no quotation marks needed. (Not sure if they gave it back, but they were happy to "store" it while "the paper-work gets straightened out")

[@valentinmalinov8424]

US military recently provided to the public a video of UFO. Further, Gravity is explained in the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

[@gyozakeynsianism]

@Valentin Malinov You mean the radar error? Yeah, no.

[@mwara2444]

The original aero saucer was made in Canada and bought by the United States military

[@valentinmalinov8424]

@@gyozakeynsianism No! They have released an actual video from a jet fighter. Is official, is not a conspiracy! I have seen it about two months ago.

[@gyozakeynsianism]

@@valentinmalinov8424 Yes they also released video of the interview with the alien pilot. Lol...

[@nubletten]

Funny how it would seem like you think you can make an arguement invalid by saying it is a made up term, while every term is made up.

[@tommymarsiglia]

Antigravity is just a way to explain magnetic levitation in different ways

[@charthom]

I will never forget the time you called my mom radioactive

[@גבריאל-ח3י]

In order for anti-gravity to exist time dilation must occur in the opposing direction through some form of capture effect. The warp engine is a theoretical device postulated by physicists that uses time dilation to create a localized free fall.

[@MrRrainbeau]

So, you have to look for the antimatter before you created it? How delightful!

[@גבריאל-ח3י]

@@MrRrainbeau Most people would probably call antimatter engines "useless science".

[@mikagitzinger369]

UFO's travel beyond space or time and sometimes unmanned...Quantum entanglement. Ufo's have their own gravity field. Ufo's, work with extreme highly advanced electro magnetic propulsion technology. Once they maintain own gravity field, they can bend space- time and light around their craft, making it automatically invisible. They are traveling through other dimensions beyond space time, and therefore we can only observe them, when they enter the solid 3rd dimension.

[@spvcs3615]

👽 : You think I'm a joke . . .

[@onebadfishtoo]

Recently declassified videos and radar data show Unidentified Aerial Phenomena which warp space-time, are tracked maneuvering at unconventional speeds, and move effortlessly through air, space, and underwater. Fascinating stuff. Also, could you explain how Quantum Gravity works in your next video?

[@markm4603]

Here is my theory, gravity doesn't exist on a quantum level but only on a macro level. Just like how there is weird stuff happening at quantum level that doesn't occur on a macro level

[@mackmcnasty27]

The US GOVT litterally put Nike missiles in people's backyards and around schools and nobody ever knew .............300 in total with a cost of $12MIL each from 1953-1973 BLUF: If uncle sam did have technology from another planet or dimension I promise you they wouldn't tell you. Dr. Lincoln works for the Govt. j/s

[@avi7278]

According to this guy, who is so obnoxiously sure of himself, those things the US gov't released can't possibly exist. This guy won't live long enough to see it, likely, but when anti-gravity is proven, maybe he'll humble himself a bit, but I highly doubt it.

[@harrybarrow6222]

Hi Dr Lincoln, my first degree is in Math and Physics, but I worked most of my life in Computer Science and AI. I am delighted to hear that there is ongoing research into whether matter and antimatter gravitationally repel each other. That is something I have wondered about. I don’t know enough about general relativity to investigate whether it is theoretically possible, but I am very interested in knowing the answer. If there is mutual repulsion, that might explain the apparent predominance of matter: there might be just as much antimatter, but by now the antimatter stars and galaxies are far, far away.

[@JimConnelley]

I was just considering the exact same. Track back to the moment where matter and antimatter were in equal proportions everywhere. It gets a little complicated doesn't it?

[@vhawk1951kl]

What did you Artificially Inseminate?

[@Tupac6780]

@@JimConnelley equal proportions everywhere? When and how do you know?

[@vincecox8376]

OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on KZbin and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity FYI: If a UFO fly's to close to you the "B" field that provides the anti gravity ("B")Field). will cancel out your power source !!!!

[@floof9789]

To me “dark matter” proves we have no idea what gravity, or even matter, is at all

[@lUnstable]

Wdym

[@JohnJackson-mn4ts]

We don’t. Thanks to work by Newton and Einstein, Science can tell you what effects Gravity will have on other objects, like light, space probes, planets, stars, all the way up to galaxies. but unlike the other 3 forces (strong and weak nuclear force, and electromagnetic) science has no answer as to what exactly Gravity is or what causes it. Until we can answer those questions, we won’t be able to develop anti-gravity

[@RAR-wg5jw]

This guy reminds me of something I read before: if you have a cave man from 100,000 years ago and you tell him that there is a civilization that can harness energy from nuclear fission in a reactor, he would tell you with a smug attitude that you are crazy because he doesn't have the knowledge to understand it even though his knowledge at the time is cutting edge... his ignorance doesn't make nuclear fission less real or possible. Where he lost me with his conceited attitude is when he says with 'absolute certainty' and with no evidence to his claim, that the US government has no such UFO in facility S4 simply because 'HE' doesn't know it. My father who served 35 yrs in the intelligence community for the US government told me without ever revealing anything specific to area 51, that there were hundreds of thousands of things that would 'flip our minds' that we the public didn't know that the US government knew. These secrets were classified information, but again, just because the government doesn't tell you, doesn't mean it isn't true and just because you don't understand it or know it , doesn't mean it is not possible. A scientist with no humility to know that he doesn't know much, is a worthless scientist.

[@TacticusPrime]

That's not how knowledge or science works. While there are many things that we suspect, there are things that we know are true and things that we know are not true. As we discover more things, they continue to support what we know while sometimes disproving what we suspect. Your example of a caveman makes no sense. Cavemen didn't have science; a system of thought that analyses the natural world. They had religion, tradition, and superstition. I guarantee that you could take the modern understanding of nuclear fission and explain it to an early scientist like Newton and he would basically get it. He might be surprised by all the new things, but none of them actual violate what was known to be true in his day.

[@graybot8064]

I look forward to your video containing extraordinary evidence for your extraordinary claim that he's wrong about there being no crashed alien spacecraft. There is no credible evidence at all... just blurry photos and videos that let you fill in the blanks with your imagination.

[@johnhobday2763]

Totally agree, this smug know-all is grossly annoying

[@Dareyouhow]

The responsibility to support the claim is on people who say anti gravity vehicles exist (I say this instead of UFO/UAP because a ufo does not necessarily entail anything extraterrestrial with anti-gravity). So far there is ZERO solid evidence of ET life of any form in the universe, that is the baseline we are coming from. To claim that there is anti gravity vehicles and ETs on earth is an extraordinary claim which requires extraordinary evidence - which we do not have. Hearsay, rumours and conspiracy theory is not evidence. The caveman analogy doesn't quite hold up here, the caveman had no physics. We have a very far developed and exceedingly accurate understanding of physics to the point that we can both make insane predictions about the future of the cosmos, and rewind the clock to mere moments after the big bang. There is a LOT we don't know but based off of our modern understanding it does not seem that it is possible. Sorry but PhD holding distinguished & qualified scientists > random youtube commenters and conspiracy theorists. These people have spent their lives studying physics... they know better than you or I do

[@waynesworldofsci-tech]

Proof?

[@trumpetman]

Could antigravity involve time travel? Speeding up time relative to the mass you’re trying to use antigravity on? Curving space requires mass, mass pulls things toward the massive object. Space time slows down in that situation, right? Antigravity would mess with time flow a little then?

[@marcelgendron]

I think that time travel and anti gravity are part of each other , can't be separated. But if a craft leaves Earth's and all of it's affects, it can be gone for twenty minutes, Earth's calculations, while in actuality it lives in a seventy two hour trek in the physics of another system.

[@trumpetman]

@@marcelgendron well, the physics are the same all over the universe, it’s just that the mass of the different objects you’re orbiting or not orbiting causes time to pass differently for you there than here.

[@clementvining2487]

@@marcelgendron Time dialation has nothing to do with time travel it is only the conditions that make time not a constant. This is from Einstein's general relativity. And Einstein did not believe in time travel that is mathematical nonsense added by others.

[@chimpwimp9407]

It could explain the weird saucer objects in ancient paintings. Idk. Seems crazy.

[@rabokarabekian409]

@@chimpwimp9407 Ever look at pictures by kds? Ignorance is not evidence.

[@KrustyKlown]

Ancient Alien Astronauts let Anti-Gravity stone tablets, with all the secrets ... but the tablets floated away into outer space.

[@ufotv-viral]

🖖👽,.

[@malayangrago5628]

Speaks clearly, lucidly and succinctly. Best science video on KZbin for the layman.

[@RJay121]

Sounds like he's trying to swallow something... distracting

[@nielshenrikdavidbohr7947]

He ignores facts: Pentagon admits , ufos exists, and Pentagon have not reasonable explanation for them. Ex-President of USA Barack Obama admits , ufos exists, and Pentagon have not reasonable explanation for them. Ex-Director Of Nation Intelligence John Ratcliffe admits , ufos exists, and Pentagon have not reasonable explanation for them. Why he ignores them? Ignorance? Desire to ignore people who deal with ufo observation data?

[@rdmz135]

@@nielshenrikdavidbohr7947 He is a physicist. His job here is to explain whether things are possible or not according to our current understanding of the universe. He's not here to speculate or prove things based on "who said what". Especially when that "who" is the government and a bunch of politicians.

[@nielshenrikdavidbohr7947]

@@rdmz135 President of USA Barack Obama - average Joe Shmoe , Director Of Nation Intelligence - average Joe Shmoe, i get your point

[@justchillin420]

Mercury which has iron dissolved in it, with impurities of Thorium, Barium, and Chromium ions, the Mercury not only becomes a ferromagnetic liquid, but also a super conductor at room temperatures or slightly above. It might need a voltage supply of 15 kV in order to get the mercury spinning fast enough but it could be used as "antigravity" device

[@Iquey]

That's great but seems really toxic. 😂

[@justchillin420]

@@Iquey not really lol if it was made properly the thing would never need to be opened just a charge applied, aside from that mercury can be vaporized idk about the hard metals tho

[@dmaschy599]

One day we will figure out how all of this works.I just hope that I am still alive when this happens.

[@davidrandell2224]

“The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “,Mark McCutcheon.

[@DavidBaronStevensPersonal]

7:55 "This measurement is gonna be SUPER EPIC . This is REAL science"

[@PrivateSi]

LHC is such a joke... A total liberal waste of grotesquely useless white elephant vanity project rip off.. If they seriously believe anti-matter could fall up all it proves is they don't know what is going on. -- Check out this load of tightly packed old balls... It's anti-EU (EU and Electric Universe) satire steeped in fundamental realism.. Satire because fundy physics is steeped in surrealist sci-woo. Fully coherent, self-balancing system that makes total sense - even if it could be a load of bollocks... The only part of the Standard Model it disagrees with / explains differently is the Quark model and QCD.. All nuclear fusion and fission reactionss can be balanced using NEW electron-positron pairs. It's all evidence-based... The Positronic Universe..! -- Bottom-up Thought Experiment... Constraints: As few base forces and particles as possible to form a coherent, integrated 4D multi/universe model -- Subspace Field: Positive cells (fuzz ball, quanta, +1) held together by negative gas. Matter-energy field conserves momentum -- Matter-Energy: Matter is focused energy.. Energy is mobile matter.. Momentum conserves velocity.. Force changes velocity and/or direction -- Positron/Up Quark/Graviton (p+): Free, mobile out of place cell warps the field, radiating AC field cell vibration 'blip' spheres at C + 6 DC spin loops -- Electron/Down Quark (e-): Hole left behind warps the field, radiating AC field cell vibration 'blip' spheres of opposite phase at C + 6 DC spin loops -- Noton/Dark Matter (n+-): Exactly opposite phase close p+ and e- annihilate (ie. entangled pair created together (e_p) ), else a noton forms -- Nucleons: Proton: P=pep.. Neutron: N=P_e=pep_e.. Beta-: N-e>>P+e.. Beta+: P+e_p>>N+p.. Alpha: A=PNPN=PeP_PeP=(pep_e_pep)_(pep_e_pep) -- Heavier Fermions: Energy sprays cells / multicell chunks leaving large -ve holes. All decay to p+s, e-s, n+-s and/or annihilate to regular = empty field -- Electrostatic Force: Recoiling blip spheres propagate. Opposite direction + and - blips form a vibrating AC bond, same sign = phase repel -- Instant-Off Long Force: AC (longitudinally blipping) subspace 'flux tube' as thin as 1 cell wide. Each cell and its -ve gas move in contrary motion -- Spin: e-s and p+s pull in the 12 surrounding cells, or -ve gas that pulls cells, that then bounce out, stabilising as a torus of 6 in/out (N/S) DC loops -- Left Hand Rule: Spin circuit cells push between field cells causing lateral, perpendicular AC blips. These form an AC blip 'spin shell' around a particle -- Strong Force: Spin loop flows merge as DC circuits between e-s and p+s. Protons may have a steep -ve gas density gradient = quantum gravity well -- Mass: Sum of the lengths of all strong force bonds + near electric field. Notons have compact strong force bonds, Protons' are long as 2 p+s repel -- Magnetism: Some spin-aligned atoms' p+s and e-s' strong bonds join in a shorter straight path. Energy conservation results in external force circuits -- Weak Force: Geometric structural charge balance instability. Possibly noton hits statistically tipping the balance -- Photon: Charged particles moving up and down (transmitter, atomic electron) form a radiating transverse wave blip pattern -- Double Slit: Laser light / particle centre's preceding, extended subspace distortion diffracts, interferes, forming wave guides observation destroys -- Dark Gravity: p+ traps 1 quantum of -ve gas so void cell size/gap grows (and matter's shrinks?) forming a macro -ve gas density gradient -- Bang Expansion: Loss of -ve gas to the multiverse?.. Bang ejector velocity petered out, magnified in time by outward momentum conservation -- Gravity Wave: Longitudinal wave where the entire field in a large region is effected in unison for a duration -- Big Ping: A dark crystal universe collisions' intense gravity wave forms e- & p+ pairs inwardly at C that annihilate or form notons, Protons, Neutrons -- Big Bang: Ping wave collides centrally? Field blast forms matter + a large hole (then Big/Dark Refill)? Fast -ve gas loss? Noton crystal exploded? -- Black Hole: Absorbs matter and energy. Noton crystal (with a core returning to empty field)? Large hole in the field traps anything entering? -- Frame Dragging: Entire sphere of subspace cells rotating around a point in unison -- Time: Cell to cell blips take a constant time. Gravity shrinks cells so light slows but locally measures C as circuits lengthen in space & time, adding mass -- This is not an aether theory, it's a matter-energy field, a quantised, relativisitic subspace medium. Forces and matter emerge from and are part of the field -- Makes more sense than making up bosons to carry force and mass, quarks that don't solve the anti-matter and dark matter problem, (anti) neutrinos, loads of fundamental fields, extra spatial and temporal dimensions etc, that ultimately don't tie relativity and quantum mechanics together properly or well... They should at least be honest and call their 'spatial dimensions' geometric/field dimensions or something.. Magic Space is not my cup of tea.

[@michaeldamolsen]

Great to see you again Doc! Thanks for all the wonderful videos you keep offering us :)

[@vincecox8376]

OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on KZbin and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity

[@rogerfroud300]

When you see craft exhibiting accelerations in excess of 1000g and instantaneous turns at thousands of miles per hour, you have to accept that some sort of Gravitational control is being used. The US Navy have gone on the record to verify these craft are real. Physics doesn't even include Gravity in the Standard Model, so you really can't speak with any authority about how it comes about or whether it can be controlled with technology or not. You simply don't know. Calling it 'silly' is demeaning and out of touch with the reality that there's a crisis in Physics brewing.

[@HyzersGR]

He called the claims about UFO’s and people making anti gravity machines silly.

[@derekdowns6275]

When we finally start understanding gravity, we will realize there is no antigravity. That won't mean that we will not learn to use gravity to the same effect, and more.

[@Hippida]

Let me save you 9 min; Anti-gravity has not yet been invented, officially

[@jeffdunnell508]

Tr3b

[@adultsasukesolosakatsuki5k409]

Officially.

[@aaraquib]

Has this guy ever wondered where his reputation stands when things really start coming out?!?

[@kh9242]

Nope because his mind is already made up

[@WokeandProud]

What things are you talking about?

[@djgroopz4952]

What things are you talking about? What has come out?

[@SidorovichJr]

He already confirmss he is ignorant but then again he knows nothing about cutting edge SAPs projects

[@lfrankow]

Cutting edge experiments can only be referenced if the results can be duplicated. Think he really ignores research that is being done? Or is it more likely that he isn’t mentioning something that can’t be trusted as reliable? How many “secret” projects have mind-blowing claims? More like tin-foil hat experiments. Are the Tylenol-shaped craft real? Yeah. For sure. But are they using anti-matter, or anti-gravity? Who knows? If they are, the research hasn’t been made public. So it can’t be quoted as being real or duplicatable.

[@marczbinden2372]

What makes me curious is, that the object that is falling down has potential energy, but as long as it doesn't impact there is no change in information except it's position in space and maybe the change of the strength from the squared distance law. I find it also ridiculous, that such small variants could tell the DIRECTION in which something should fall. It's like there is some enormous but invisible machine at work.

[@DamianHallbauer]

Noether currents and quantum scalar field theory pushes . its all soliton thoery and declassifed. force isnt r2 except over time.. rapid terms a 1/r3 adn 1/R. thsi guy is in Newtons +quatunm plus Eisnte himself didnt like his first GR adn not one read his quantum gravity. we have no concensus on gravity theory but engineers use what works.

[@mikagitzinger369]

UFO's travel beyond space or time and sometimes unmanned...Quantum entanglement. Ufo's have their own gravity field. Ufo's, work with extreme highly advanced electro magnetic propulsion technology. Once they maintain own gravity field, they can bend space- time and light around their craft, making it automatically invisible. They are traveling through other dimensions beyond space time, and therefore we can only observe them, when they enter the solid 3rd dimension.

[@fugslayernominee1397]

Can't wait for the results i'm so excited.

[@ufotv-viral]

👽👍

[@scotth6814]

I'm so excited, I just can't hide it, I'm about to lose control and I think I like it.

[@elimalinsky7069]

Don't hold your breath. All expectations are that antimatter will abide by gravity just like regular matter. The results are purely technical to officially confirm an already established therory.

[@bobpope3656]

I had a friend a long time ago get the equation for “anti gravity” tattooed on him self and I wanted to explained to him that it probably wasn’t a real thing, but I couldn’t explain why. I feel so justified now

[@michaeljames5936]

Don't forget to show him this video. He might jump out of his skin.

[@bobpope3656]

@@michaeljames5936 i try not to let things bother me so much now, but when i was younger i hated hearing him explain this to people.

[@sbkarajan]

@@bobpope3656 The thing is, current science is so corrupt, he maybe closer to the truth than this Don guy from some Fermi lab.

[@bobpope3656]

@@sbkarajan if you knew my friend you would not say that lol. dude is great for parties, political and scientific conversation though, not is strongest skill set.

[@Ghostrider-ul7xn]

“Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts" - Richard Feynman Remember that quote

[@PAULTHEAV8R]

I love it when well educated people use their academic laurels to convert theory to fact.

[@HarshithPranesh]

How so?

[@TesterAnimal1]

A theory is not the same as an unproven assertion.

[@merlinidlehands3302]

like evolution LOL

[@BallMuncher555]

I’m sorry but that’s a stupid statement. While gravity is a theory, from our observations of objects around objects of high mass, as well as observing that clocks move faster the farther away you are from the center of gravity, we can say with confidence that relative gravity is a real thing.

[@BallMuncher555]

@@merlinidlehands3302 evolution has lots of proof behind it to help back it up.

[@VictorVæsconcelos]

Regarding "people use the same term for different phenomena; so that should tell you whether you should trust them". I mean, (you obviously know that) but things are not nearly as clear-cut in science as people seem to think. One thing that we eventually found out were, well, two things, are nebulae and distant galaxies. Same applies to things like stars and "nova"-which comes from Latin and means "new", as in "new star"; they looked like new stars because they were previously stars too dim to see that increased in brightness several thousand times when they went nova, making them look like stars that suddenly appears. In fact, many things in astronomy seem to be misnomers, like "quasars" and even "dark *" (they're not dark, dark things absorb light; these things don't interact with light at all, though this came to be used as in "dark" to us, i.e., no one has "shed light" on these phenomena). Anyway. This wasn't just a thing of the past, either. There are many candidates for things that we call one name but may well be different phenomena. Like dark matter (could be like any mix of MACHOs, WIMPs, and modified gravity), odd radio circles (some seem to have an object in the center, while some don't), fast radio bursts (some seem to repeat, while some only happened once), blue optical transients (could be any very energetic event at this point), I could go on. In fact, many more phenomena are likely to be discovered, as we explore the unknown unknowns in the infrared with the poorly-named JWTS, but also with new telescopes in basically all EM wavelengths with our already in operation, as well as upcoming radio and x-ray telescopes. They will allow us to elucidate phenomena which are currently just "blurs", but also discover new phenomena that was previously impossible to discern at all, but will be our new mysterious "blurs".

[@Ben24-7]

As someone who watched a UFO hovering 5 feet above my van for 10 minutes , I dont pretend to understand how it was able to do that and move away without using Thrust , or have any noise , anti-gravity is just name people use describe something they can't comprehend, what I can say is what I seen underneath reminded me of a particle excellerator from videos I've seen on KZbin following physicists like yourself, but it also looked like Antimatter fusion, I really don't have the words to describe what I seen , but it changed my life forever. I believe if I was able to sit down and have a conversation with someone as knowledgeable as yourself, using drawings and giving full details , I might be able to steer you in the direction to building space craft that could get us in to interstellar space . Call me a dreamer that's ok lol

[@christianvachon2235]

I will ask an odd question: was it possibly circulating/rotating liquid mercury from an magnetic/electromagnetic field that you saw? Was it silvery, possibly with other light? There are example available that you can see on a small scale; it might similar to what you saw. Oddly enough, this was described in the Ancient Indian vedas as part of a propulsion system for what they called Vimanas. As for the rest, the levitation is through magnetic/anti-magnetic means (electromagnetic levitation).

[@skd7702]

@@christianvachon2235 Oddly enough I am currently researching this topic and it led me down this path in the "folklore" data department when it comes to these.

[@christianvachon2235]

@@skd7702 Cool! Please feel free to share any discoveries - I would be most interested. Cheers!

[@Dr.M.VincentCurley]

I didn't believe my physics teacher in 1986 when he told me that; "Little more will be known about the 'graviton' when you teach and have children". Obviously I didn't believe him, especially after watching "Back to the Future II" in 1989. The fact of the 'matter' is, while we do know a little bit more about gravity and the elusive graviton, we don't have any working ideas on how to harness its effects. (Like we do with electro-magnitism for example).

[@malcolmspark]

Just a thought for you. Can you imagine having a beetle then studying in great detail the molecules, atoms, and sub atomic particles that make up that beetle to try and find the basic particle that will explain beetle behaviour? I'm sure you will say, well there is no such particle, there is no beetle behaviour until you have a whole beetle. Maybe, just maybe, the same is true for gravity. There is no particle that explains gravity, there is no universe gravity until you have a whole universe. Now not for a moment am I suggesting this is correct, but I would love some considered thought on the idea.

[@dennismcmahon5442]

Hold on just a wait darn minute! All you have to do is change the dilating force of time. It really is that simple right? So just invent a time machine and you have a gravity machine. Turn it backwards and gravity goes negative. Speed it forward and, you got it, you have uncle-gravity.

[@scififan698]

of course! that's so simple!

[@robcat2075]

If anti-matter falls up that would explain why we don't find it lying around very often.

[@DGill48]

"ten to the forty power is a big number" Classic and casual understatement

[@hitbox7422]

Most people have problems grasping everything above 10^10, let's aside 30 magnitudes higher.

[@MiccaPhone]

It's big, but not huge. For huge numbers look at other numers like: (links to be added) -

[@arandomperson8336]

It's easy to prove the he's has been replaced. Just look at the old videos on this channel - the real Don has grey hair. This Don has white hair. Checkmate, alien-replacement deniers!

[@viewer3147]

LOL! 🤣

[@somebody9825]

EXACTLY

[@somebody9825]

they think they're so smart...

[@LukeAmaral]

Dr. Don: making anti-proton and anti-electron is pretty easy Also Dr. Don: making anti-matter is outrageously difficult. Sounds like something a high-tech android using an advanced alien technology from zeta reticuli would say

[@TheSteamaster]

This is my 1st time at this channel. I get all the sensationalism of the fun stories which the host states unequivocally are false however, I've never understood why anyone would claim something is absolutely false unless that individual had access to everything going on in the scientific arena. Science is never settled. To claim it is, strains the credibility of the person making the claims. IMO.

[@ijamsum]

Agreed , it was a hit job on de-bunking the idea of anti-gravity which has been done and in use as of 1999 ! The current definition of gravity in the encyclopedia is so garbled it makes no sense at all ! I was taught gravity works by particle entanglement that transmits every atoms weight to all local objects like the Earth so gravity has a certain amount of pull and if you block entanglement communications the atoms in your craft become weightless ! Whistle blowers say it works using a 2 or 3 terahertz frequency electromagnetic field around a object or craft and blocks the communications like static block radio communications ! Hense we now have a 43 space ship fleet off world !

[@nanno650]

the amount of pseudoscience in the comment section is legendary

[@MichelleFrets]

I've read that gravity is mainly caused by different rates of the flow of time. Would anti-gravity require traversing time backwards?

[@dennismcmahon5442]

Man I wish I had read your comment before I commented. Exactly! All we need is a very very simple time machine.

[@loganwolv3393]

Well according to general relativity... the more mass so the more gravity, the slower time flows in that region. So that means for anti gravity...it means that when you're in the range of an object with anti-gravity time will flow faster (so anything outside that anti-gravity bubble you'd see in slow motion). And if there's a region where time flows backwards...that would require infinite gravity wich is impossible.

[@MichelleFrets]

@@loganwolv3393 You're saying that gravity affects time instead of the reverse. Maybe you're right but it's contrary to my current understanding. I hope that Dr.Don takes up the question

[@valentinmalinov8424]

I don't think that time has an effect on Gravity. Gravity is explained in the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

[@juancuelloespinosa]

phew, the mustache is back, everything makes sense again

[@mountfairweather]

Everything tickles* again

[@donquixote812]

You could be missing a force. Something that could help explain dark energy. I hope antimatter goes up, because we haven't had many recent experiments disagree.

[@TheologyUnleashed]

Why is the idea that UFOs use anti-gravity silly? There's a lot we don't know about physics, why not think the manufacturers of UFOs have worked it out?

[@narfwhals7843]

Because the idea of extraterrestrial UFOs is "silly" (meaning there is very little evidence and what evidence there is is almost always readily explainable by terrestrial sources). The manufacturers of UFOs are humans and humans have not worked it out.

[@nmarbletoe8210]

yeah, antigravity is the one concept we can relate to that might have a chance at explaining the strange movement of UFOs

[@heavymeddle28]

I have an antigravity device. It even takes me to the land of spells and fairies. It is propelled by natural powers. A bong

[@heavymeddle28]

@@watchtrillions what gave me away? 😊The user name or bong?

[@medexamtoolscom]

I thought you were going to say it was your bed. Because you sleep on it and dream of lands of spells and fairies, and because when you're on your bed, it applies an upward force on you to keep you from falling to the center of the Earth therefore it is an antigravity device too.

[@heavymeddle28]

@@medexamtoolscom hehehe.. I'm not a "heavy" smoker but I do smoke when I go to bed and you are correct. I fire it up in the bed 😊🔥💚

[@collinstanton]

Very intriguing, great definition, truly thought-provoking. Thx.

[@vincecox8376]

OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on KZbin and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity

[@jvcscasio]

Why would we expect antimatter to be antigravitational if it's just matter with flipped charge?

[@jokuvaan5175]

Because it's not just matter with flipped charge.

[@jonharson]

You don't, I don't, we don't, but some of these physicists can't put the pipe down.

[@valentinmalinov8424]

You are correct! All these puzzles are explained in the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

[@eigenvector123]

Now it's proven that antimatter falls just like regular matter. The group confirmed their results on September 27, 2023, which made me so happy because I had watched Don's video right after its release and saw the news later!

[@faiyazmuhtasimahmed6771]

maybe kids from future playing with their antigravity toys will be smiling when they see this video! :P

[@arkachallo5628]

Maybe....But I blame the parents of said kids, after all, antimatter is super duper dangerous :P

[@Kabup2]

@@arkachallo5628 Safe toys, appropriate for the age.

[@Skylancer727]

@@Kabup2 Yup, nothing says safe like a fancy bomb that will go off it it doesn't charged quick enough (due to the magnetic confinement being required to hold it).

[@michaelcharlesthearchangel]

Eurocentrified Fermilab appears to be attacking American developers who have developed TR3-Bs. So Fermilab is a narrative umbrella now?

[@Kabup2]

@@Skylancer727 I remember the time when I was a kid, I used to play with firecrackers all the time, merging several together to get a big one :)

[@NVOMK416]

“There’s no such thing as anti gravity” Artificial intelligence “hold my beer”

[@Tupac6780]

No proof you conspiracy theorist

[@boneleg6952]

​@@Tupac6780sheep

[@mikagitzinger369]

UFO's travel beyond space or time and sometimes unmanned...Quantum entanglement. Ufo's have their own gravity field. Ufo's, work with extreme highly advanced electro magnetic propulsion technology. Once they maintain own gravity field, they can bend space- time and light around their craft, making it automatically invisible. They are traveling through other dimensions beyond space time, and therefore we can only observe them, when they enter the solid 3rd dimension.

[@Jeprox77]

No human can really comprehend antigravity, only those flying UAP

[@johnbassett3188]

United Air Parcel Service !!!

[@1566marcus]

🤣

[@colt1674]

They concluded the experiment now and with 97 percent accuracy the particles react the same to gravity