What's the truth about antigravity?

Antigravity is a key part of many science fiction and UFO reports, but it’s an idea that is potentially scientifically reputable and scientists at CERN, Fermilab’s sister laboratory, are investigating possible connections between antimatter and antigravity. In this video, Fermilab’s Dr. Don Lincoln covers both the fact and fiction of this interesting topic.
Goede award:
goede-stiftung.org/en/goede-award
Inertial vs. gravitational mass:
• What you never learned...
Fermilab physics 101:
www.fnal.gov/pub/science/part...
Fermilab home page:
fnal.gov

[@JohnBare747]

My favorite t-shirt says "I read a book on Antigravity and couldn't put it down!"

[@ceciliapares2804]

Love it!!😂😂👍👍👍

[@oldmech619]

Time must have flown while reading it

[@XRioteerXBoyX]

@@oldmech619 relatively speaking it did

[@bill392]

I read a book on Gravity but it was heavy reading. I wanted to read a book on Centrifugal force but I never got around to it. I told my class a joke about chemistry but it got a bad reaction.

[@stevenutter3614]

@@bill392 What about the one where you try tripping on acid after they told you your jokes were too basic?

[@iMeatbag]

My favourite quote that I only get to share once a year: "Ah, April 1st: the only day of the year where people think critically about what the read and see on the Internet before believing it as true."

[@fernandoperna887]

Fantastic!!!

[@lightspeed9762]

Perfect.

[@alex_chugaev]

Cool

[@nielshenrikdavidbohr7947]

Lets deal with facts: Pentagon admits , ufos exists, and Pentagon have not reasonable explanation for them. Ex-President of USA Barack Obama admits , ufos exists, and Pentagon have not reasonable explanation for them. Ex-Director Of Nation Intelligence John Ratcliffe admits , ufos exists, and Pentagon have not reasonable explanation for them. Why he ignores them? Ignorance? Desire to ignore people who deal with ufo observation data?

[@iMeatbag]

@@nielshenrikdavidbohr7947 Imagine talking about UFOs without knowing what it means... unidentified flying object... doesn't mean aliens. Drones have come a long way in the last 20 years and what you can buy and see in stores is not even CLOSE to the epitome of what the technology is capable of in some testing lab somewhere. Just because there is no immediately obvious and reasonable explanation doesn't mean it's aliens. Thank god people like you only talk about stuff like this in comment sections and aren't actually involved in any research or scientific study. You have NO clue what the scientific process is and would likely jump on the first theory you came to. Please stick to folding fancy tin foil hats and scaring off your relatives because if you actually become responsible for anything more than that we are all doomed.

[@jrbleau]

4:45 making anti-electrons or anti-protons is pretty easy... 8:16 antimatter is outrageously hard to make... Hard to make and store in macro quantities.

[@Mysoi123]

😂 well actually, making antimatter is easy but the production are pretty slow. In fact, to make one single gram of anti Hydrogen took 1 billion years assuming continuous operation.

[@thanosfickda]

@@Mysoi123 idk if you joking or not, if its so easy, we would already have few kg of anti matters per year

[@Mysoi123]

@@thanosfickda This is due to the abundance of atoms in a single gram. It is quite feasible to generate antimatter, few atoms at a time.

[@thanosfickda]

@@Mysoi123 then why we don't do more of it? maybe we can't contain it easily?

[@Mysoi123]

@@thanosfickda The second explanation is related to energy conservation. It is likely that we do not have sufficient energy. If one gram of antimatter is converted into energy by allowing it to come into contact with ordinary matter, the resulting power would be equivalent to the detonation of two atomic bombs like those dropped on Hiroshima. This implies that to produce one gram of antimatter, an equivalent amount of energy must be utilized. Hence, this constitutes the second explanation for the slow pace of production. a little mass is a lot of energy E =mc^2 , Einstein famous equation.

[@rschiwal]

My mother told me that when she was in grade school they taught her that it would be impossible to fly to the moon because by the time you loaded an airplane with enough fuel and supplies, you couldn't get it off the ground.

[@LeeStoneman]

And that is why her teachers only managed to get as high a Grade School. They were clearly not very clever.

[@patriciajrs46]

Why is it that people are so ready to argue the stories about putting a man, and his spacecraft, on the moon? They claim it never happened and it was all tricks of the government with cameras and secret locations.

[@Baalaaxa]

Well, her teachers were kinda correct on that one. It would be impossible to fly to the moon with an airplane, no matter how much fuel and supplies you would load it with. But with a spacecraft, and a sufficiently efficient rocket engine, well, it's a different story.

[@DoreVibe]

@@Baalaaxa I believe that was the entire point. At that point in history, we didn't have enough understanding of the tech that eventually got us to the moon. Anti-gravity hasn't been understood enough to build a craft in mass, "publicly".

[@nowster]

"Scientists have invented an anti-gravity device. It's called a chair." (Attributed to Feynman)

[@troeteimarsch]

made my day!

[@Karolpa1138]

But what about....ladders and elevators?

[@troeteimarsch]

@@Karolpa1138 they're factor x more powerful, u're right xD

[@ebnftl2272]

Good one! 👏👍

[@d4v0r_x]

right up there with the device to pass trough walls: a door

[@JustOneAsbesto]

If someone actually DID have an antigravity device, they could probably use it to make WAY more than a million euros.

[@AlienScientist]

Lockheed would offer you more than that just to keep your mouth shut!

[@thekaxmax]

@@AlienScientist Lockheed? Any govt would offer you a billion and then put you somewhere safe, just in case.

[@brad3]

2 million euros

[@greenstash]

OR GET RAIDED. John Kenneth Hutchison.

[@JustOneAsbesto]

@@greenstash ya ok

[@418cjpaul]

I'm really glad Dr. Lincoln was able to understand my explaining this to him.

[@berlinlooks]

It doesn’t add anything to the discussion but for the sake of KZbin algorithms I will comment: brilliant video! Thank you as always 🙏🏻

[@Pspersonal-bp8by]

@6:54 Dr. Don: "And this is a big but." Sir Mixalot: *enrolls in particle physics classes*

[@Kabup2]

big butt?

[@portuguesepossum3165]

🤣🤣🤣

[@kenlieck7756]

And that, my friends, is a prime example of antigravitas...

[@scienceisall2632]

@@kenlieck7756 haha

[@Ted...youtubee]

I read a small booklet on LASERS. It was light reading.

[@jerrymiller276]

When my daughter was very young, the first time she saw a helium balloon she asked, "fall up?"

[@Ed-quadF]

Shel Siverstein wrote a book about that.

[@_Nibi]

@Elijah how? She was wrong

[@aliservan7188]

OMG Adorable! I don't have kids but I'd have been so proud!

[@lolcano2346]

@@_Nibi because she's taking concepts she's already familiar with to be curious and critical about the physical world around her You're an idiot who probably struggles to understand people

[@_Nibi]

@@lolcano2346 seems like it was an incident that is completely unrelated to intelligence. It’s just kids being kids. No need for your immature ad hominem.

[@felipelopes3171]

Hi Dr. Don, isn't there also an argument that antimatter should fall down because of CPT symmetry? It would be a striking result if it falls up.

[@davidwelner9994]

He was right in saying it is as simple as whether Einstein’s Equivalency Principle also applies to anti-matter. Better way to consider it at this stage.

[@arturoquintanar4078]

Dr. Lincoln, what if you shoot a beam of antimatter and one of matter from a rotating table?. Could Coriolis acceleration produce two equal particle trajectories but with opposite curvature as measured from the rotating table? Does this make sense?

[@noahway13]

The current Dr Don robot is learning, and acting more natural with more fluid movements. It still has a long way to go to seem real.

[@ccole1255]

Yes they're still working on stopping it from doing the robot (dance) long enough to sustain an unedited Fermilab video

[@somebody9825]

nutcase

[@vincecox8376]

OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on KZbin and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity

[@iStormUK]

I subscribed so long ago, Don had just got his PhD, been hooked ever since. ;) Seriously though, my days are happier now you're back in person :D

[@ufotv-viral]

👽👍👍

[@jeromebloom_gripcraft6031]

Another great video and really concisely explained!

[@earthalienzapa3237]

Gravity have weight? there is gas make things float.

[@fauzulazim2993]

@@earthalienzapa3237 That's because there's other matter has more weight

[@will2see]

Forget Carl Sagan's quote, I have a better one: "Extraordinary groupthink leads to extraordinary ignorance" - Avi Loeb

[@JCO2002]

With all due respect, Avi Loeb is nothing but a headline-hunting, click-bait huckster.

[@will2see]

@@JCO2002 Not at all!

[@TheChzoronzon]

Almost any quote is better than that crap. Claims require (good) evidence, full stop. "Extraordinaire claims" reeks of prejudgement, and "extraordinaire evidence" suggest there are two kinds of evidence, passable and the luxe... pffft I never understood why that silly, elitist, cheap quote gets so much spread. Stop, please.

[@will2see]

@@TheChzoronzon I totally agree.

[@Tim3.14]

The reason a claim that contradicts well-established theory is considered "extraordinary" is because the well-established theory is already supported by copious evidence. And thus the extraordinary claim needs extraordinary evidence to overcome all the evidence against it. In other words, claims about the physical world aren't evaluated in a vacuum. They're evaluated in the context of what we already know about how the world works.

[@marthinusdawidvanrooyen2508]

"Making anitmatter is pretty easy" What a time to be alive.

[@roberttapper3296]

Not for long if alot of anti matter mixes with regular matter

[@MrDogonjon]

Anti matter is anti time as well. Matter causes time dilation so anti mater uncauses time dilation making matter not matter any more. anti matter will push against the force acting on it providing the opposite impulse. Push it forward it goes backwards in spasce and time. then it's hard to find it because it is behind you in the past..

[@vadinhopsc]

If you have a Large Hadron Collider in the basement, it is indeed easy. Remember that if you make even just ONE positron it IS antimatter. Now, to get half a kilogram of antimatter is another story.

[@livefully7568]

so when one blows an object up it's hard to find in space and time.. gotcha

[@adultsasukesolosakatsuki5k409]

Honestly No nothing special, it would be better times to be alive with no cover up and holding back technology

[@Davelement]

Is CERN/LHC available for rent? How would I go about pursuing this? The experiment would be classified, unfortunately, as it has massive financial potential, but the results would eventually be made public. Using the facilities will be astronomically expensive, hence the need for confidentiality and eventual monetary exploitation. I don't even know if persons outside of government or academia are allowed to conduct experiments, but waving 9 figures around will surely let me get priority on the calendar. Right?

[@SuccessMMA]

Please do a video explaining how the "tic tacs" on the Pentagon videos of UAP are capable of their movement.

[@Willaev]

"I say 'prove it'" Richard Feynman: "You can never prove that you're right you can only prove that you're wrong."

[@michaeljames5936]

Feynman said that? ... Prove it!

[@Ghostrider-ul7xn]

Feynman also said : Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts.

[@l0_0l45]

I think "proof" was said here in the colloquial sense. Asking for *evidence* in this case was the appropriate word.

[@awesomedata8973]

But it wasn't "Carl Sagan" who said that, so it doesn't count. Besides, (massive mountains) of 'evidence' isn't the same as 'proof' to this guy. Yet it seems to work well enough to 'prove' things in the court of law. So go figure. :P Truth is owned by this dude -- and this dude alone. He is a 'real' scientist doing 'real' science (on KZbin) after all! -- He is judge, jury, and executioner when it comes down to truth! -- Even if you've seen one, if you can't prove UFOs exist, you are simply delusional! -- You'll _never_ convince him UFOs are real!!! -- Or so he says. lol

[@fnamelname9077]

But how can you know that you're right, that you're wrong?

[@darimshamsi2329]

Hey! Dr.Don is back to rock on!!

[@Ni999]

@Z3U5 Dark energy would like to know your location. (Pardon the stale meme style.)

[@danuttall]

Same great presentation style. I still miss seeing the bookcase in the background.

[@Aufenthalt]

The Don is on! Feel the Don!

[@larrystenger1247]

Question , does the weight of an object weigh the same at a temperature of near zero degree Kelvin and then at 1 million degrees C. Within the same space since the higher temperature will vaporize matter.

[@BottleBri]

In January 1989 I saw a disc float over my cottage in Scotland. It was going very slowly and there was nothing holding it up. It was also very low- only about 60 feet up. It was making a low humming sound, it had a series of circular red lights around the base facing downwards. There was no wind from it, it had no wings, no jets, no rotors, nothing. It should have fallen out of the sky. Whatever was keeping it up, wasn’t ‘silly’ but very effective, and very real.

[@michalwojcik9106]

He is closed minded scientist like others, pitty because i like other videos

[@stestar09]

He's a need to see the evidence type person , You are lucky enough to have seen that , many others haven't & still believe, for you its confirmed , whether others believe you or not is not as important, you have confirmation. I envy you in some ways as i know that since we are here , why can't others be in the universe? We are here from practically nothing, but having our conditions just right ✅️ there must be other galaxies with a similar life bearing planet , possibly far more further along its evolutionary path than ours is , for all we know - that disc you saw back in 1989 could have been something as simple as a guided tour of our highlands - from another planet , we do it when we take trips away , why can't they ?

[@BottleBri]

@@stestar09 true. I do know what I saw, but it was a craft defying gravity- I didn’t see aliens. But my own opinion is that it wasn’t made by us- not in 1989. That would mean the military having cracked anti gravity 33 years ago at least, and never used it nor admitted to having it. Possible, but unlikely. Tech always runs downhill from the military, slowly but surely. You’d imagine some new tech associated with it would’ve come down to us by now. Thanks for commenting. 👍🇬🇧

[@tastyfrzz1]

Saw something like that in Moorhead,MN in 1978. There were nukes there at the time so it figures that they were there.

[@unethicaldesigns]

Are you sure there was no wind? Because that craft was that shape for a reason. The flying saucer shape creates a lot of lift but also has little air resistance.

[@gregchambers6100]

"A lie will get half way around the world before the truth gets its pants on." Mark Twain.

[@Eowyn3Pride]

✌thank you Mr. Twain!😘

[@mariusgrobler]

My dear mother taught that a lie comes on horseback and the truth on foot. She grew up a long time ago...

[@Eowyn3Pride]

@@mariusgrobler lies come easily, the truth has endurance...

[@MiccaPhone]

The lie about antogravity by rotating discs even got around the world more than just once.

[@somebody9825]

nutcase

[@mak675]

A blacksmith friend of mine and I were discussing exotic physics the other day....and considered gravity propagating through the fabric of space as a wave.....what would happen if you could produce an opposing wave......would it counter the force like nullification of sound by producing a counter wave, like the headphones that counter sound.......or am I way off base?

[@blackhat856]

So how do you gauge the US Navy footage

[@dr.victorvs]

Regarding "people use the same term for different phenomena; so that should tell you whether you should trust them". I mean, (you obviously know that) but things are not nearly as clear-cut in science as people seem to think. One thing that we eventually found out were, well, two things, are nebulae and distant galaxies. Same applies to things like stars and "nova"-which comes from Latin and means "new", as in "new star"; they looked like new stars because they were previously stars too dim to see that increased in brightness several thousand times when they went nova, making them look like stars that suddenly appears. In fact, many things in astronomy seem to be misnomers, like "quasars" and even "dark *" (they're not dark, dark things absorb light; these things don't interact with light at all, though this came to be used as in "dark" to us, i.e., no one has "shed light" on these phenomena). Anyway. This wasn't just a thing of the past, either. There are many candidates for things that we call one name but may well be different phenomena. Like dark matter (could be like any mix of MACHOs, WIMPs, and modified gravity), odd radio circles (some seem to have an object in the center, while some don't), fast radio bursts (some seem to repeat, while some only happened once), blue optical transients (could be any very energetic event at this point), I could go on. In fact, many more phenomena are likely to be discovered, as we explore the unknown unknowns in the infrared with the poorly-named JWTS, but also with new telescopes in basically all EM wavelengths with our already in operation, as well as upcoming radio and x-ray telescopes. They will allow us to elucidate phenomena which are currently just "blurs", but also discover new phenomena that was previously impossible to discern at all, but will be our new mysterious "blurs".

[@420snoogins]

I've fallen up the stairs, more than a few times. Proof of anti-gravity.

[@wictimovgovonca320]

Is that you Joe?

[@josephcoon5809]

@@wictimovgovonca320 😂 Beat me to it.

[@sarielreigns777]

Joe Biden ✊😂😂🤣

[@johnashtone7167]

Take more water with your drinks next time lolz.

[@joesguiltyguitar]

That's well said lol

[@rsauder]

"What goes up must come down.". Nope, not true. Once you hit 11km/s you ain't ever coming down- ever.

[@tda.thedevilsadvocate]

Espace velocity doesn't defie gravity, it just works on the gravity principles, it's not like you beat gravity :p

[@arcanewyrm6295]

@@tda.thedevilsadvocate Agreed. To "defy" gravity would be to demonstrate an absence of being affected by gravity in any way, while achieving escape velocity is to simply overcome gravity's effect - not eliminate it.

[@RikiB]

its been a year already. Has the experiment happened yet Dr. Lincoln?

[@RG-gk4yi]

Is there an update on the CERN experiment?

[@peterkelley6344]

Prediction: You and Matt O'Dodd of PBS's Space/Time will become parallel presentations to each other. Hope you continue these discussions. It was super fun dive into the subject. Keep up the discussion.

[@michaeldamolsen]

Great to see you again Doc! Thanks for all the wonderful videos you keep offering us :)

[@vincecox8376]

OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on KZbin and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity

[@paulchristian9045]

There was an article I read about a while back about a small amount of matter with negative mass that was created, from a Bose-Einstein condensate if I remember correctly. Do we know how this interacted with gravity?

[@narfwhals7843]

If you read that it was misreported. Negative mass has never been observed. Perhaps they were talking about anti-matter? This has been shown to interact with gravity just like regular matter in experiments in 2021.

[@EinsteinsHair]

@@narfwhals7843 @paulchristian9045 was probably referring to observed small regions of negative effective mass. "Negative-mass effects in spin-orbit coupled Bose-Einstein condensates." When I first read his comment I thought he might be referring to something similar in metamaterials: negative effective mass density in acoustic metamaterials. Not really negative mass.

[@waitwhat3547]

what if there was a way to multiply the interaction force (strong force) between protons and neutrons by just having a large quantity of them in a huge concentration, that technically could be antigravity

[@georgewashington90]

When you want to talk about anti gravity , the first you should define anti gravity. The answer whether it exists or not depends on definition of anti gravity.

[@rorytaylor1202]

Yes i was thinking that too, no mention of time and space, dilation or lensing effects. Personally i think the vacumn acts like negative mass not matter.

[@David35687]

These dumbasses can’t even fit gravity into the standard model of physics. However I will to give them credit for exposing the muon anomaly and the opening the door to the possibility of a fifth fundamental force in physics. Now if they could only figure out why the heat level in the suns corona can be as high as 6000 times greater than the temperature of the surface of the sun. Is it a low energy nuclear reaction or is it a hydrogen to hydrino conversion ala brilliant light power? Because without the high pressure that exists in the center of the sun, coronal heat cannot be due to be standard fusion.

[@David35687]

@@scififan698 Does anybody out there have an opinion on the coronal heating anomaly. Apparently NASA thought it was important enough to send up the Parker probe a couple years ago to fly thru the Sun’s corona.

[@collinstanton]

Very intriguing, great definition, truly thought-provoking. Thx.

[@vincecox8376]

OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on KZbin and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity

[@ChrisWalshZX]

Any update from Alpha about their measurements of the gravitational force of antimatter? Cheers

[@jaspreetmodi]

its almost a year ... whats the update ?

[@manavmnair6975]

Lets all be honest. Without Dr Don, Fermilab is just like any other KZbin channel

[@hrlincoln9873]

A Fermilab video on Antigravity? I'm literally floating!

[@aniksamiurrahman6365]

Maybe they all float down there.

[@SquirrelASMR]

Ohh you... 😂

[@IAOIceland1984]

You're falling, just upwards

[@erics.4113]

@@aniksamiurrahman6365 🎈

[@michaelcharlesthearchangel]

Why all the ad hominem? If these guys "no it all" then how come they don't know it al☆l?

[@v_sign]

Never underestimate the unknown, Fermilab. Once in a while it is precisely someone from this peculiar group of freethinkers who paves the way for a new invention. So a little more respect please for the freethinkers among us.

[@Calikid331]

This! I hate that science can sometimes feel cult-like. If you don't think the same way they do, or if you challenge long established theories or concepts they will ridicule you, just like they did Einstein.

[@skywatcher369]

💯💯💯x 20. 👉👆👈, ✌. 🌀⚡🌀x4,\ x6=🛸. I hope I'm not being too obvious. Your statement is very correct.

[@alexandernahan6768]

cope

[@romangherta2201]

we need to see more of this man

[@stevenbliss989]

Good to know this experiment if going on with several teams. As you said, it would be awesome if they do go up, but not practical for anything we can use. Thank you for the video :)

[@DamianHallbauer]

too bad they are using antimater because that isnt necessary. and it falls down. yoi get two gamma rays.. youi cant steer them. mabye it will get used but magnets do work . we jsut never bother to scale them or build them , we think we can all8 billoin of us hangout here and eat all the fish.

[@carlwillows]

The best explanation of gravity I've understood is that it is a result of space/time and mass. Anti-gravity would be analogous to anti-time.

[@Calikid331]

I agree. Since gravity slows down time, it's possible that anti-gravity speeds it up, or makes it flow in reverse. If we could somehow get time to flow faster in a confined area I think that would create an anti-gravity effect.

[@robertstrong6639]

That's right, time causes gravity, perhaps way in the future we could have something called "temporal dampeners" that wouldn't negate gravity just delay it into the future, like a shortcut. On Star Trek the ships have "Inertia dampeners" It delays inertia.

[@TonyP9279]

What you need is some good ol' Element 115.

[@omniking3479]

He conveniently left that out...

[@masonmax1000]

exactly to bad we are to stupid to recreate a stable version of the element

[@eneresolong]

Apparently it's silly when Bob Lazar says the exact same things as him about anti gravity and unstable elements/antimatter drives...guess it's silly because 1990?

[@eneresolong]

So that's what dunning Krueger looks like when a genius experiences it.

[@Jordan-cr6rh]

what is element 115

[@Virgilvega-kw9nm]

I don’t think this representative from fermi lab did his home work with regards to the the published papers published by NASA Physicist at Univ of Alabama-> Ning Li, who’s papers claimed a practical way to Produce anti-gravity effects (1991, 1993) creating down “gravitomagnetic field perpendicular to their spin axis.” She wrote “if a large number of ions could be aligned, (in a Bose-Einstein condensate) the resulting effect would be a very strong gravitomagnetic field producing a strong repulsive force.” The alignment may be possible by trapping superconductive ions in a lattice structure in a high-temperature superconducting disc. Her claim of having functional anti-gravity devices was cited by the popular press and in popular science magazines with some enthusiasm at the time. “In 1997 Li published a paper stating that recent exponents reported anomalous weight changes 0.05-2.1% for a test mass suspended above a rotating superconductor. Although the same paper describes another experiment that showed the gravitational effect on a non rotating superconductor was very small, if any effect existed at all.” ->very cool. Your big Black T-shirt and cheeses little video cut pieces from old flying saucer movies --> marks you a defender of Huburis. You should not be allowed to represent Femi Lab, please sit down.

[@justchillin420]

Mercury which has iron dissolved in it, with impurities of Thorium, Barium, and Chromium ions, the Mercury not only becomes a ferromagnetic liquid, but also a super conductor at room temperatures or slightly above. It might need a voltage supply of 15 kV in order to get the mercury spinning fast enough but it could be used as "antigravity" device

[@Iquey]

That's great but seems really toxic. 😂

[@justchillin420]

@@Iquey not really lol if it was made properly the thing would never need to be opened just a charge applied, aside from that mercury can be vaporized idk about the hard metals tho

[@entropiauniverseflyovermob4181]

I always learn something from the team at Fermilab. I like it in this video when he said "This is real science". Ive let go of my old ideas and am trying to build new ideas off the real science. Such an adventure. Thanks for letting us join you on this quest.

[@stevenhauth9753]

There is a patent for a device that can reduce gravity's effects here on Earth up to 87% so if this guy really knows what he's talking about you should Google this anti-gravity device and maybe learn something.

[@alice_in_wonderland42]

@@stevenhauth9753 anyone can patent anything, I can patent a device which converts bullshit into gold

[@marketsocialist6421]

So have you?

[@ronaldmorrison2765]

@@alice_in_wonderland42 Sorry, some of the "news" outlets have that patented and monetized already.

[@brucesoehngen852]

Science is a process that is never absolute. Wait and see. The proof is out there.

[@sebaufiend]

I am reminded of a paper I once saw where they theorized gravity has a "charge", where all normal matter has the same charge and all anti matter has the opposite charge. So all matter is attracted to matter, and all matter is pushed away by anti matter. The paper I think made a claim about how if this were true, the spontaneous production of electron-positron pairs could actually explain some dark matter behavior. It's been a long time since I read it.

[@earthalienzapa3237]

Like trying make windup car go up hills if could will windup again going down.

[@72Phaidros]

Is there an update to this after 1 1/2 years? What did they find at CERN?

[@drfisheye]

CERN found anti-matter falls down, like normal matter.

[@richardcottone6620]

do you think that there is any validity to the videos that the navy put out , and what do you think the technology would be if so

[@jackietate4047]

"Like explaining how UFO's fly. Which is kind of silly". I guess this guy missed the memo that the government is now admitting that UFO's (uap's) are real.

[@tribalwar117]

Oh so now you believe the government ;)

[@ThomasJr]

you are an idiot, you shouldn't even be watching this channel, it's not for amateurs

[@ThomasJr]

@@tribalwar117 lol

[@NovaStrike118]

Yes UFOs exist. No they do not use antigravity because as mentioned, it is silly. lol If they use some advanced technology to fly, it's most likely something we don't know about yet, and antigravity is just stupid because how would you even control it? It'll always either push you up or pull you down, and if you theoretically have the same amount of matter as antimatter in your ship... how would you connect them? Surprise surprise, anti matter annihilates with any matter it touches. NOT TO MENTION: If the ship was made out of antimatter, it'd continuously be touching the air which would ALSO annihilate it.

[@SirHiggalot]

They admitted they're real videos, that's about it.

[@remsmith3233]

Thanks Dr. Don for getting “science “ out there in the public.

[@konondenkiplangat9727]

I am happy to be watching this now. Have they announced the results on antimatter gravity properties?

[@kunalsingh4418]

Yeah. Sadly it antimatter behaves in exact same way to gravity as matter. Basically it also falls down. Science can be disappointing sometimes. 🥲

[@joecaner]

It's been a year. Are the results in from those experiments on anti-hydrogens behavior in relationship to gravitational forces?

[@ronald3836]

Now they are, but you probably know this already.

[@stitchem7]

Scientist = "..using the term antigravity to explain how ufo's fly is kinda silly.." Cave man = "..using the word gunpowder to explain how bullets fly is kinda silly.."

[@squirrel1117]

🤣🤣🤣🤣 You were the best man! Great argument! I loved your comment! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@stitchem7]

@@squirrel1117 Yeah, I try to expose mainstream bias anywhere I can,...lol

[@squirrel1117]

@@stitchem7 Most of these scientists don't know anything... the secret science of antigravity and stuff outside the mainstream of science/conventional science, has been hidden and suppressed for nearly a century... You know that, right?

[@donotwantahandle1111]

...and then he goes on to talk about Roswell, s4 etc!

[@somebody9825]

are you saying that those crappy alien documentaries aren't silly?

[@alephprime3770]

Ive missed you SO much ! glad to see you're back 👍

[@ufotv-viral]

👽👍

[@zeinkassim2785]

Have we ever tried anti hydrogen fission? It would be interesting to see the results

[@paulstubbs7678]

An atomic fridge?

[@Frank-pu2gq]

Doc, I didn't notice you saying a word about negative mass and anti-gravity, or the rubidium Bose Einstein condensate and the way it behaves.

[@dsracoon]

The real secret of Area 51 is that the real saucy stuff is in Area 52 where no one suspects it.

[@AKGuerilla]

Area 52 is where the peons that don't rank high enough to work in Area 69 work.

[@dillongarner1]

Site 4

[@TheThansen669]

@pinpoint45 Nonsense. If the UAE craft are real and demonstrate the kind of maneuver capability described by eyewitness accounts they are not stealth and likely do not use any form of kinetic propulsion. If real, whatever is allowing that type of instantaneous acceleration while ignoring basic principles of flight is radically advanced...well beyond even the most advanced prototype craft any nation has developed. It is likely a difference in technology level between a campfire and a nuclear reactor, literally thousands of years ahead of where we are right now. Though you may be right about it being a drone, if any human pilot were in one when it took off with such instant acceleration their body would be abstract art on cockpit wall.

[@hobohistorian4732]

You have no I dea.how much this statement is understated.

[@hobohistorian4732]

@@TheThansen669 maybe up to 17Gs before the craft itself begins to fail structurally. These craft are pulling 600Gs.

[@fugslayernominee1397]

Can't wait for the results i'm so excited.

[@ufotv-viral]

👽👍

[@scotth6814]

I'm so excited, I just can't hide it, I'm about to lose control and I think I like it.

[@elimalinsky7069]

Don't hold your breath. All expectations are that antimatter will abide by gravity just like regular matter. The results are purely technical to officially confirm an already established therory.

[@g3no11]

sorry for being dumb,so if you if you throw an apple in the air, and at the point of total neutral (not up and down) before it falls, is that not no gravity? might be absolute millle second, so at the point of neutral with no wait, could we not find away of supporting the neutral weight, find the object of any weights neutral point and support it?

[@k9876k]

I think gravity still acts on it as a force, but the energy used to throw the apple exceeds the force of the gravitational pull of the Earth. Gravity is the weakest force out of the four fundamental forces. I'm likely wrong though and someone else could explain it a lot better.

[@runggp]

I like Dr.Don a lot for the awesoem videos!

[@dporangecounty]

What about Dark Energy? Doesn’t that have an anti-gravity effect? I was expecting to hear that covered in this video.

[@timugiwara]

Dark energy is causing the expansion of the universe / space-time, that’s not the same as a force that repels mass...

[@ets9191]

It’s more like Dark energy exhibits negative pressure which result in a propulsive force. It’s not anti gravity and it is hypothetical as hell.

[@Posesso]

I think the key difference is that Dark Energy is not suffering anti-gravity, it is exerting it on the surrounding matter. It pushes away what is around it via negative pressure, but itself is not moving anywhere, neither in an antigravity fashion. A bit like an engine of an elevator is not suffering anti-gravity just by going in the opposite direction from gravity when going up. The example/analagy sucks, but maybe is sufficiently correct and helps.

[@scienceisall2632]

@@timugiwara The less mass present, the more effect the dark energy has. The two are interlinked

[@nic.h]

@@timugiwara isn't dark energy the name given to the unknown cause responsible for the "acceleration" in the expansion of the universe. The acceleration being key in that description

[@AlienScientist]

You did not mention the bilayer disc or the radio frequency fields that Eugene Podkletnov stresses in Part 5 of the interview on my channel titled "NASA's Big Mistake". It was also in his paper which you didn't cite here in your "complete" coverage of the "real science" on this topic. You also failed to mention the Muonium antimatter/antigravity experiments taking place at Paul Sherrer Institute in Zurich, as well as Daniel M Kaplan's Muonium research which solves the problem of charge that Fermilabs currently faces with it's outdated anti-proton production equipment. You talk briefly about the equivalence principle and Eintstein, but failed to mention Einstein's colleagues like John Archibald Wheeler and Bryce DeWitt and their early theoretical work on Quantum Gravity, Quantum Foam, and the notion of Quantum Non-Locality. You have likewise overlooked the theoretical work that has been done in this field over the last 30 years starting with Miguel Alcubierre's warp drive paper in 1994 and branching off into Bernard Haisch's work for Lockheed Martin, or Mike McCulloch's grand stand against Dark Matter with Quantized Inertia. You also didn't talk about left handed metamaterials, white holes, trapped light, squeezed light, polariton condensates, negative mass, or any of the cutting edge research we've been covering over here for the last 3 years or more... I was serious unimpressed with Don's robot dance as well. We all know the Lazar stuff is disinfo... but it at least opens doors for the conversation, right??

[@NakedProphet]

In other words - PROPAGANDA. Notice the .gov links. The government has NO reason to lie to us. (Sarcastic)

[@NakedProphet]

This guy's job is not to open conversations. His job is to steer the minds of the masses. As he says so clearly - There is no anti-gravity! He is an expert. He's from Fermilab. All others are hucksters, fools, and conspiracy theorists.

[@cs9628]

Have you ever looked at jim goodall? Be good to get him on your show. Hes not a scientist but i believe was in the military and was a journalist. Worth checking out

[@AlienScientist]

@@cs9628 Jim Goodall was Bob Lazar's friend. He is the source of the famous Ben Rich quote that no one has actually been able to pin to Ben Rich about "we have the technology to take ET home"... lol. I have interviews with much more credible scientists and engineers, and I'd like to stay on that path moving forward.

[@cs9628]

@@AlienScientist jim goodall may be bob lazars friend (prior to him working for s4 (if he ever did)) but the quote from ben rich does not come from jim - the quote comes from talks Ben use to do (some say he used to say it as a joke). The quote that comes from Jim regarding Ben Rich is the deathbed confession of his that "we have things in the desert that are 50 years beyond what you could comprehend", unfortunately this was over a telephone call so cannot be confirmed...i thought it may be worth having him on as he is/was well respected in aviation. Also keep up the good work ive been watching your channel since late 00 - good to actually get a response from you

[@spvcs3615]

👽 : You think I'm a joke . . .

[@MarleneBlackwinter]

what if you started working through the Higgs-Boson field and such and flip the polarity with regards to how H-B interacts with mass???

[@trumpetman]

Could antigravity involve time travel? Speeding up time relative to the mass you’re trying to use antigravity on? Curving space requires mass, mass pulls things toward the massive object. Space time slows down in that situation, right? Antigravity would mess with time flow a little then?

[@marcelgendron]

I think that time travel and anti gravity are part of each other , can't be separated. But if a craft leaves Earth's and all of it's affects, it can be gone for twenty minutes, Earth's calculations, while in actuality it lives in a seventy two hour trek in the physics of another system.

[@trumpetman]

@@marcelgendron well, the physics are the same all over the universe, it’s just that the mass of the different objects you’re orbiting or not orbiting causes time to pass differently for you there than here.

[@clementvining2487]

@@marcelgendron Time dialation has nothing to do with time travel it is only the conditions that make time not a constant. This is from Einstein's general relativity. And Einstein did not believe in time travel that is mathematical nonsense added by others.

[@chimpwimp9407]

It could explain the weird saucer objects in ancient paintings. Idk. Seems crazy.

[@rabokarabekian409]

@@chimpwimp9407 Ever look at pictures by kds? Ignorance is not evidence.

[@malayangrago5628]

Speaks clearly, lucidly and succinctly. Best science video on KZbin for the layman.

[@RJay121]

Sounds like he's trying to swallow something... distracting

[@nielshenrikdavidbohr7947]

He ignores facts: Pentagon admits , ufos exists, and Pentagon have not reasonable explanation for them. Ex-President of USA Barack Obama admits , ufos exists, and Pentagon have not reasonable explanation for them. Ex-Director Of Nation Intelligence John Ratcliffe admits , ufos exists, and Pentagon have not reasonable explanation for them. Why he ignores them? Ignorance? Desire to ignore people who deal with ufo observation data?

[@rdmz135]

@@nielshenrikdavidbohr7947 He is a physicist. His job here is to explain whether things are possible or not according to our current understanding of the universe. He's not here to speculate or prove things based on "who said what". Especially when that "who" is the government and a bunch of politicians.

[@nielshenrikdavidbohr7947]

@@rdmz135 President of USA Barack Obama - average Joe Shmoe , Director Of Nation Intelligence - average Joe Shmoe, i get your point

[@shubhampanwar7647]

If we somehow create a time gradient opposite to that of earth, will the object inside the gradient experience opposite gravitation force?

[@seanspartan2023]

Doesn't anti-gravity imply negative mass / negative energy? Also gravity wells create time-dilation which the equivalence principle says can be modeled by traveling at relativistic speeds through space. But an anti-gravity well would dilate time in the opposite direction. (To a distant observer, time would speed up). But the equivalence principle wouldn't hold because traveling through space at relativistic speeds only slows down time (to a distant observer).

[@TheOzarkExplorer]

Well, you did a fine job of dismissing the experiments others have worked on, like Ning Li and Podkletnov, but you didn't even touch on the tech used in those UFOs videos we've been seeing from the U.S. military. You offered nothing at all that explains those. I am no physicist but I can't completely dismiss the observations those two and others have offered that have been researching in this field. The truth is what we don't know is still far greater than what we do know and hubris has always stood in the way of understanding what we don't know.

[@ryokohakubi2928]

ScientiaCras2 12 hours ago (edited) That Fermilab video won't age well.

[@mysapphirestar]

Are the results out yet?

[@kokomanation]

I really am not sure about this but I think there are experiments with pressurised objects inside vacuum that can float resisting the “force” of gravity at some level I don’t know if this could be used as some type of propulsion in empty space

[@harrybarrow6222]

Hi Dr Lincoln, my first degree is in Math and Physics, but I worked most of my life in Computer Science and AI. I am delighted to hear that there is ongoing research into whether matter and antimatter gravitationally repel each other. That is something I have wondered about. I don’t know enough about general relativity to investigate whether it is theoretically possible, but I am very interested in knowing the answer. If there is mutual repulsion, that might explain the apparent predominance of matter: there might be just as much antimatter, but by now the antimatter stars and galaxies are far, far away.

[@JimConnelley]

I was just considering the exact same. Track back to the moment where matter and antimatter were in equal proportions everywhere. It gets a little complicated doesn't it?

[@vhawk1951kl]

What did you Artificially Inseminate?

[@Tupac6780]

@@JimConnelley equal proportions everywhere? When and how do you know?

[@vincecox8376]

OK let's get this correct !! #1 The only reason radio waves and AC current travel out in space and down a wire is because of the "CENTER " of a magnetic field. (The "B" field), The North and South poles are the weakest part of a magnet !! Just like Tesla said, you got to look at things you can't see !! At the center of a magnet is anti gravity, (just tap the center on any glass or plastic and it will loose weight), The center can repel water if vibrated at the correct frequency, If you vibrate the "B" field into granite rock it will become soft and you would need copper tools to work on same , you don't want to disrupt the magnetic (B")field ) with other iron. Once you understand the "B" field of a magnet and how it relates to the entire universe we live in, you will then understand what Tesla was telling everyone "LOOK FOR WHAT YOU CANNOT SEE"" .I believe the pyramids were inter galactic communications and transportation systems. Stone Henge and Gobekli Tepe , power plants. Take a look at Coral Castle Florida on KZbin and you will see a similar pilar. I believe these horizontal pillars were oscillators that would provide excitation for many things from crops in the field to anti gravity FYI: If a UFO fly's to close to you the "B" field that provides the anti gravity ("B")Field). will cancel out your power source !!!!

[@jvcscasio]

Why would we expect antimatter to be antigravitational if it's just matter with flipped charge?

[@jokuvaan5175]

Because it's not just matter with flipped charge.

[@jonharson]

You don't, I don't, we don't, but some of these physicists can't put the pipe down.

[@valentinmalinov8424]

You are correct! All these puzzles are explained in the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

[@fernando.alvarez.123]

I missed you mentioning "gravitational waves". Wouldn't they be related to this subject?

[@aandarcom]

There are only "waves" when the object bending the time/space is rotating around some other object.

[@JasonFennec]

Its been a year. Did we get those results?

[@user-zz3sn8ky7z]

Yes, several experiments were conducted in the time between now and this video and they all agree that matter and antimatter respond to gravity in the same way

[@Geralt--of--Rivia]

Scientists used to think air travel and reaching space weren't possible and look what happened. Nobody knows for certain what breakthroughs and technologies we'll have a 1000, 100 or even 50 years from now. Some humility wouldn't hurt.

[@danmoretti8898]

Yeah no shit. This channel is the epitome of 'well ackshully' scientism, and unfortunately for us on KZbin, appears to be one of the few things that Fermilab actually has going for it.

[@melodies92]

Exactly! Thank you!

[@jerrypolverino6025]

Not all scientists. Science is dynamic. It changes as we learn. But! No matter how much research we throw at a subject we can’t change the laws of physics.

[@Boogaboioringale]

Absolutely no reason antimatter should fall up. But the funding sure comes in handy.

[@Boogaboioringale]

Prior lack of knowledge is no excuse for being stupid today

[@arpitdara6466]

I am really into physics, I am just about to finish high school right now and will for an engineering college ,but my child hood dream is to become a physicist ,please suggest me a way to Research like you guys in future. Please respond.

[@Unidentifying]

maybe dont go for engineering but physics instead? lol

[@arpitdara6466]

@@Unidentifying dude in india its not that easy.....

[@frede1905]

@@arpitdara6466 Well, sadly you don't become a physicist by studying engineering, so you'll have to study physics if a physicist is what you wanna be. Maybe it's possible to study abroad instead?

[@ericputney4598]

Take it from someone who went to university for physics: it is important to go to school for something you actually want to do. Otherwise it will be very hard to learn physics (past the basic physics courses you will take for engineering) on your own! There are a lot of scholarships for international students if you are able to come to the US for your studies! None of these things will be easy, but if this your dream then you should go right for it! It is easy to forget a dream after you get dragged into things that are more stable, but less fulfilling. Going to university for physics opened a lot of doors for me. I worked at the gBar experiment at CERN (mentioned in this video!) because there are many research programs and internships available to undergraduate students in physics. These same doors are often not open to engineering students, which is why we're urging you to study physics! I know it's hard, but there were many Indian students in my undergraduate class and in my graduate class now who have the same dream. It is possible!

[@channelwarhorse3367]

Gravity therefore power. G~P is curve to content. Particle wave duality. Macro is micro per projection to energy transfer, stability of content.

[@hadherramadhanmohammed3699]

thanks allot Dr you explained it in very scientific way 🌹🌹🌹

[@mrcrankshaft2000]

One more question is the TR 3 B airplane possible today? Or is it a hoax?

[@sjnsns7544]

I can make it

[@pbp6741]

I really wanted that spaceship to fall straight down and have the cartoony halos and birdies upon the doctor saying “... which is ... kinda silly.”

[@Squgglebum]

Love how at the beginning of the video the idea of anti-gravity is not even considered real, yet as the video goes on, almost everything ‘anti’ at places like CERN is completely accepted.

[@LarryFleetwood8675]

Anti-gravity is indeed real and mainstream science knows it very well too, there's just a complete blackout on this subject in MSM ordered from the top of government in I'd imagine pretty much all nations on Earth, which is why you always hear scientists denying its existence. Without them o board and the alrwady corrupt MSM, it'd likely not be possible to maintain the cover-up as it has been for so many decades now. The reason is simple; it's literally earth-shattering news if they revealed its reality especially damaging to the oil industry which is how all infrastructure is based. Fossil fuel is also how the powers-that-be keep their stranglehold control on the entire world, so free energy/anti-gravity is kept under lid in black budget program. Basically, when NASA sends up their obsolete propulsion rockets they're stalling this thing.

[@danadevoe7962]

Since we don't have a firm understanding of gravity, I always find it interesting when people like this guy dictate what is possible and what is not. I believe such blind skepticism will not lead us to the future we want. When experimental results disagree with theory, the theory is probably wrong. I have seen people dismiss experimental results because they disagree with theory and refuse to attempt to replicate the experiment. When they do attempt to replicate the experiment they will not replicate correctly.

[@skybellau]

@@danadevoe7962 I agree, we should be sceptical of our scepticism. But nothing he said "dictated" otherwise. ???

[@garylacoursiere4413]

Anything that can be replicated by other scientists is completely accepted, that's how science works. You can postulate anything you want - it may not be provable yet (like anti-gravity), but that doesn't mean we can't investigate it. When he says something isn't real (like some anti-gravity claims), it's because it's been dis-proven. That means that different scientific teams have tried to replicate it using the claimant's setup, and it doesn't work. Again, that's how science works.

[@LarryFleetwood8675]

@@garylacoursiere4413 Yet, they lied...why doesn't that possibility even occur to you. An advanced technology is being protected here, most likely on some international agreement keeping it secret to the public thus keeping the status quo of today's energy sources. Obviously this advanced technology is real, since many of us have actually seen craft in the night sky that defy the officially known means of transportation. I.e., free energy/zero point energy is a reality, the problem is proving it which is the difficult part when there obviously is this secrecy surrounding its existence, aided by MSM coorporation.

[@alexander_adnan]

Its impossible. Why? Because i tried to do it and failed at it… therefore no one else can .. You are the perfect example of resisting to science and creativity

[@MQFahey]

If gravity is the result of a curvature in spacetime created by mass (and I freely acknowledge that my supposition mat be wrong), what exactly is the reverse condition that we might observe as “antigravity?” Could there be an antigravity well with a gradient that results in a different transport of mass?

[@noway8233]

As Gravity is think as a central force ,all line forces goes to the center of mass , Antigravity will pont to the oposit ,from the Center of mass to the outside , to the universe

[@MichelleFrets]

I've read that gravity is mainly caused by different rates of the flow of time. Would anti-gravity require traversing time backwards?

[@dennismcmahon5442]

Man I wish I had read your comment before I commented. Exactly! All we need is a very very simple time machine.

[@loganwolv3393]

Well according to general relativity... the more mass so the more gravity, the slower time flows in that region. So that means for anti gravity...it means that when you're in the range of an object with anti-gravity time will flow faster (so anything outside that anti-gravity bubble you'd see in slow motion). And if there's a region where time flows backwards...that would require infinite gravity wich is impossible.

[@MichelleFrets]

@@loganwolv3393 You're saying that gravity affects time instead of the reverse. Maybe you're right but it's contrary to my current understanding. I hope that Dr.Don takes up the question

[@valentinmalinov8424]

I don't think that time has an effect on Gravity. Gravity is explained in the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

[@glifnard3053]

Do you disagree with US Military released video of UAPs? Looks a lot like antigravity tech to me.

[@ninjaboots9139]

So whats your explanation of the tictac objects observed buy the us military.

[@narfwhals7843]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/i2LHmmOOfsZsiLM

[@robcat2075]

If anti-matter falls up that would explain why we don't find it lying around very often.

[@onebadfishtoo]

Recently declassified videos and radar data show Unidentified Aerial Phenomena which warp space-time, are tracked maneuvering at unconventional speeds, and move effortlessly through air, space, and underwater. Fascinating stuff. Also, could you explain how Quantum Gravity works in your next video?

[@markm4603]

Here is my theory, gravity doesn't exist on a quantum level but only on a macro level. Just like how there is weird stuff happening at quantum level that doesn't occur on a macro level

[@mackmcnasty27]

The US GOVT litterally put Nike missiles in people's backyards and around schools and nobody ever knew .............300 in total with a cost of $12MIL each from 1953-1973 BLUF: If uncle sam did have technology from another planet or dimension I promise you they wouldn't tell you. Dr. Lincoln works for the Govt. j/s

[@avi7278]

According to this guy, who is so obnoxiously sure of himself, those things the US gov't released can't possibly exist. This guy won't live long enough to see it, likely, but when anti-gravity is proven, maybe he'll humble himself a bit, but I highly doubt it.

[@user-ru6mq1xw9y]

In order for anti-gravity to exist time dilation must occur in the opposing direction through some form of capture effect. The warp engine is a theoretical device postulated by physicists that uses time dilation to create a localized free fall.

[@MrRrainbeau]

So, you have to look for the antimatter before you created it? How delightful!

[@user-ru6mq1xw9y]

@@MrRrainbeau Most people would probably call antimatter engines "useless science".

[@rogertulk8607]

So how would you warp space-time to make matter fall up?

[@kurtbecker3827]

It is human nature to believe the unlikely and reject the obvious.

[@muninrob]

When I went to the VA Beach Military Aviation Museum during the late 90's, they had a "captured", "alien", Flying Saucer on display. Avro VZ-9 Avrocar, seized while crossing the Canadian border - making it both "captured", and while in the US, "alien", and it was definitely a flying saucer, no quotation marks needed. (Not sure if they gave it back, but they were happy to "store" it while "the paper-work gets straightened out")

[@valentinmalinov8424]

US military recently provided to the public a video of UFO. Further, Gravity is explained in the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

[@gyozakeynsianism]

@Valentin Malinov You mean the radar error? Yeah, no.

[@mwara2444]

The original aero saucer was made in Canada and bought by the United States military

[@valentinmalinov8424]

@@gyozakeynsianism No! They have released an actual video from a jet fighter. Is official, is not a conspiracy! I have seen it about two months ago.

[@gyozakeynsianism]

@@valentinmalinov8424 Yes they also released video of the interview with the alien pilot. Lol...

[@jacksavage4098]

Never say never. What is impossible today may be the 'norm' tomorrow.

[@valentinmalinov8424]

You are correct! Gravity is explained in the book - "Theory of Everything in Physics and The Universe"

[@SaveTheFuture]

Here's a paper with some solid experimental data on reactionless thrust: "Electrostatic accelerated electrons within symmetric capacitors during field emission condition events exert bidirectional propellant-less thrust". Check it out.

[@nicholaskelly6375]

Remember If an eminent scientist says that something "Is Impossible" Then they are probably wrong. However if the same eminent scientist says that something "Is improbable" Then they are probably right.

[@PenguinSage]

@@nicholaskelly6375 We are in good company then, because this video says ant-gravity is improbable, but would be really cool to have. I have the same stance on several other physics questions. FTL travel? Probably not, but very useful if you do, but time travel? Unless the universe has some way to resolve paradoxes, no. Makes for great fiction though 😀.

[@nicholaskelly6375]

@@PenguinSage I fully concur I love science fiction and hope that a lot more will come to pass!

[@jacklee5876]

Anton Petrov reported an article about this matter (!) yesterday - might be a good opportunity for Dr Lincoln to do a followup video. :)

[@narfwhals7843]

"Well, I was right" is a pretty boring followup video.

[@rkmugen]

We have AI now. We need to use it to push antigravity research much faster than we've been doing.