Makes sense to me. In parts of Vancouver B.C. we see this exact situation. First floor is retail with drug stores, grocery stores, restaurants etc. Floors 2-5 are professional offices with accountants, lawyers, doctors etc. Floors 6 and up are apartments or condos. Perfect for seniors who have mobility issues and have hung up drivers licenses. Drive your mobility scooter to the elevator to go out for coffee etc. If you're lucky your doctor is in the same building. Like mentioned the issue is retrofitting plumbing, heating etc. to fit the new use. The question for building owners is what costs more. Renovations or going without rent.
@keikofay980411 ай бұрын
Vancouver, BC tries and that's awesome. Dig that! I wish the U.S. would put in even half as much effort into truly mixed-use bldgs as more than a promotional piece, but really walk the walk!
@rasul40710 ай бұрын
Are houses that cost in Vancouver also built in 1947 and are in crumbling condition that cost $2.5 Mil?
@chickentoucher5510 ай бұрын
No one gives af you got far worse issues bunch of Nazi sympathisers
@Bruce_LeRoyy9 ай бұрын
Terrible idea downtown is usually too noisy for seniors not to mention they're on a fix income.....
@thuptendlama60917 ай бұрын
Less traffic if office vacant and closed
@Kronk-rp3jf11 ай бұрын
The guy said in real estate they dont do things out of the goodness of their hearts...dont expect bailouts from the goodness of the publics heart either.
@mikea574511 ай бұрын
Correct. They expect bailouts because they generously "donated" to their local politician's campaign
@emptiester11 ай бұрын
Pfft we get a choice all of a sudden?
@Jinchuricki2711 ай бұрын
PREACH
@mimianti-stush23111 ай бұрын
Postman Brothers are a perfect example. Conversions to high-end luxury apartments.
@Jinchuricki2711 ай бұрын
@@mimianti-stush231 not all people can afford high end luxury housing, people just want a place to live.
@duanebidoux608711 ай бұрын
In Houston, where I live, I think we have the highest office vacancy rate in the country at about 25%. There was a period where there were just cranes everywhere, even some being finished off right in the middle of a period when half the people were at home. But, suddenly, a couple of years back all these residential towers start going up, and apparently, those are selling quickly. So I think there would definitely be the demand there. People are sick of 1.5 hour commutes in heavy rain.
@masonhl200011 ай бұрын
Houston really needs to start building up and not out, I'm tired of driving 2 hours and still being "In Houston" when I gotta go across town.
@duanebidoux608711 ай бұрын
What struck me as weird about the report is not talking about Houston. It seems weird that they keep starting new residential towers when there's empty offices everywhere. And Houston in noplace on that list of cities doing it? Especially considering that when it comes to getting permits there can't be an easier place to do it. They actually have been building up a ton--just not places you can live in@@masonhl2000
@BrowncoatGofAZ11 ай бұрын
@@masonhl2000that’s true for a Lot of cities here in the USA.
@Avantime11 ай бұрын
The biggest problem with Houston IMO is the added expense of car parking for apartment dwellers. Houston is not a city you can navigate without a car, so even if you can walk to work, you still need the car for groceries and visiting friends and family.
@duanebidoux608711 ай бұрын
Well, I think everything is fixable. You probably could have enough people who work in the area who would trade 2 or 3 hours a day driving and I do believe new public and prive infrastructure projects could be supported enough to allow people to live and work within walking distance. But it would take some kind of planned public private partnership which is anathema to Texas at its core. @@Avantime
@Roshmore711 ай бұрын
We need to build more multi purpose modifiable buildings as we build newer ones
@TheGreatWasian_11 ай бұрын
Honestly yeah why aren’t more people saying this
@doujinflip11 ай бұрын
Modular spaces are basically a warehouse. Residences have the additional challenge of the demand for external windows to at least the bedrooms if not every room, which is why commercial builds are problematic to convert given their largely artificially-lit spaces occupied only half a day during the work week.
@LM2.S5411 ай бұрын
WE? you need to go get a loan and get it done if that is what you want.
@Sunlest11 ай бұрын
Sounds good, but I imagine the problem is that doing so could severely hamper the efficiency of a building by being designed as modifiable for different types, lowing how good it is for another. Like for plumbing and all, an office doesn't need inner pipes going everywhere, but housing does. So you either build piping as you build the building as an office, making it useless, or end up heavily changing the building to modify anyways.
@damnitschris_11 ай бұрын
@@Sunlest Its hard to do modifications on commercial property especially one that would be residential too since youll be subjective to residential and commercial laws. You wont be able to shut a floor or section o the bldg for modifications. If you are able to modify a floor itll cost just as much to take all your equipment needed to whatever floor your in and thats before any work has been done. Its just wont be profitable for anyone for a building to be modifiable
@jordansmith5349 ай бұрын
Interesting report, watching you from Toronto Canada. Fifteen to twenty years back we started converting office buildings to residential. It was a outstanding success and lives on to this day providing homes, taxes to the city and retail space on the ground level. Lets not look for the why nots and instead towards then when can I move in.
@Opalsdad11 ай бұрын
I work in Sf , at a Junk removal company, I’ve cleaned out T -Mobile, Ultra beauty products, etc etc… my company is booming… from my perspective it’s nuts…
@bobcom856210 ай бұрын
¿Puedes explicarnos lo loco que es?
@danc944011 ай бұрын
The problem I see is that all of the office to residence conversion are rentals, versus condo ownership. There is enough (too much) rental/lease residence in major downtown cities already. Ownership brings stability and buy-in to the community, versus the "here today and gone tomorrow" folks. Developers/Investors might not like it, since there isn't the enough profit margins for their liking, but local governments and their tax incentive programs have to look out for the long term future of their cities. Just my 2 cents.....
@BrowncoatGofAZ11 ай бұрын
On the other hand, owning an office building with no one working inside it is just a money pit for these owners. Maybe selling a floor to a homeowner wouldn’t be such a bad thing.
@Avantime11 ай бұрын
No one likes buying apartments because they generally don't rise in value in accordance with the housing market, compared to normal suburban homes. Why? Families start to want space when they have children. The valuation being detached from the general housing market makes mortgage lenders jitterish in terms of giving mortgages to apartment buyers, further hurting demand. So people who buy them are typically investors who rent these units out for an income stream - the lenders like this arrangement better. And then there's the upkeep costs of a high-rise, which could sting owners with huge bills, often for stuff they don't want (e.g. communal gym, pool). Also unlike a house which could in theory last for more than a century, a high-rise may not survive that long especially if upkeep isn't done properly - an apartment isn't something that you can pass on to your grandchildren. Office towers are especially expensive both because of the ultra prime real estate (so building owners don't want to sell up for cheap, which makes those converted apartments unaffordable for those investors and tenants) and they're built according to the desires of well-heeled corporations, and so they're very expensive to maintain. I mean how many apartments have floor-to-ceiling windows? Just think of the heating costs.
@Avantime11 ай бұрын
@@BrowncoatGofAZ It's not a money pit if it's tax deductible. Some foreign investor syndicates use it to park their wealth in the US as part of a diversified investment portfolio, as commercial real estate carries much more risk compared to just buying a suburban home.
@BrowncoatGofAZ11 ай бұрын
@@Avantime sounds more like corrupt businessmen storing their money in Swiss bank accounts.
@mentertainment506311 ай бұрын
Tell people they need to change the American culture of making profits, to actually creating affordable homes so people can live not on the streets. People over profits.Take Japanese culture and living for example.
@courtneyhazelton556311 ай бұрын
So we can't really "afford" to build affordable housing in vacant office space because contractors can't make enough profit off of low cost housing and cities "need" higher end housing to keep the tax base up (regardless of whatever reason they give, it's the tax revenue). 1) If it can be built, it can be built at less cost. THAT is nothing more than a management and engineering problem 2) Don't tell me fees, regulations and taxes can't be addressed in a manner appropriate to accommodate low cost housing conversions if you're the City Government
@SonyDjuana11 ай бұрын
In Korea, they started doing what they call office-tel, multipurpose office-hotel (or residential) in the late 80's until now.
@Sweethands411 ай бұрын
Yes that's called "concentration camp".
@2MinuteHockey11 ай бұрын
@@Sweethands4 not German style those had central showers
@PhatAssObese10 ай бұрын
just as expensive and hard to save for a house out there too
@toolwithintention10 ай бұрын
I love Korea
@Jinchuricki2711 ай бұрын
All I am hearing is the profit motive is far more important than helping people with the basic necessity of shelter.
@dabda851011 ай бұрын
I mean what do we expect???
@jonsmith765911 ай бұрын
This is America. The entire point of existence is to turn a profit. Human beings are at best, an extremely distant second.
@ryantetreault344711 ай бұрын
I can't believe you aren't paying the rent for a stranger out of the goodness of your heart
@rubiconnn11 ай бұрын
That and upper class snobs being so disconnected with reality. "There won't be enough windows with natural light. People will never want to live in these apartments". It's like the wealthy get off on watching the lower class suffer.
@Dave05J11 ай бұрын
Private companies will always look for profit! Just put yourself in their shoes
@calvinliu816711 ай бұрын
Some of them can probably be converted to dorms or retail or gyms where only 1 big bathroom is needed
@vicepresidentmikepence88911 ай бұрын
We can put a man on the moon, but we can't add plumbing to a building??
@poleonpoleon70611 ай бұрын
😂 I think they can but it's so costly that they might just as well rebuild . That's what I heard elsewhere
@jardelnunes636311 ай бұрын
It's all about how much it costs. But of course we can
@BlazerManiacNumber9611 ай бұрын
Was that really your main takeaway from this?
@mamascookin11 ай бұрын
Exactly the US has "The Best" engineers and creative designers but we can't reverse engineer these things into something else 😂 what an absolute joke
@benjamindover433711 ай бұрын
London Breed said she will be bringing solution to the legislators, which she knows they won't be open to. So she is saying she has no expectation of any potential of suceess, but she's doing it anyway. That tells you everything about why this won't be solved.
@Cyrus99211 ай бұрын
Housing scarcity especially in San Francisco Bay Area are largely due to difficulties building upward and outward. Hold the policymakers accountable
@NGCS-ej4lz11 ай бұрын
"upward and outward" Oh yes, like China or Hong Kong, how exciting, sky high buildings and nothing else till the sea meets the sky.
@Szcza0411 ай бұрын
@@NGCS-ej4lzhow else will you house people in limited space you dunce
@nraketh11 ай бұрын
All you have to do in San Francisco is drive,over the hill and see stretches of endless single family houses and you’ll see why they have a housing shortage.
@FordDraper11 ай бұрын
It isn't just lawmakers unfortunately, the people of of San Francisco, mostly people who have owned homes there since the 60's voted against buildings being able to go above a certain point.
@dandydoodigery985411 ай бұрын
@@FordDraper100%, you nailed it. Locals that have owned their homes for over 20 years are trying to protect their home values by voting people in that pass laws that don’t allow for building over 3 stories
@jaykrown11 ай бұрын
It's a serious shame they lacked the foresight to make office buildings easily convertible to residential when they initially built them. The idea that we'd have workers crammed into pointless cubicles for years to come was a mistake while the internet was becoming rapidly adopted. All we needed was a global pandemic to show us how pointless commuting was for a large portion of workers. Late stage capitalism will keep the heaviest burden on the working class, the land owners don't want more affordable housing.
@Incomeking-v4s11 ай бұрын
Easy for you to say. But regulations and profits margins tell otherwise
@efonwang11 ай бұрын
Probably a lot more expensive to build to be compatible for both types
@doujinflip11 ай бұрын
Commercial requirements and residential ones are considerably different. 24-hour occupation, external windows, and individual bathrooms per tenant are demands that offices don't have to deal with.
@mirandasmith685611 ай бұрын
Lol you say as if you’ve physically built the alternative yourself. It is a shame, why not go show them how to fix it?
@ThuhOthers11 ай бұрын
This is a lot easier said than done, and many office buildings are constrained by their footprint
@dantheman90911 ай бұрын
The truth is that office space goes for a premium compared to residential. The sqft rate is probably 2x higher on office space. But if there is no one there to rent the office space, then you get nothing at all...
@acw712011 ай бұрын
Why are they all empty then?
@evalangley398511 ай бұрын
Some government officials are thinking about doing the same in Canada with the whole work from home situation. Many public servant can do 99% of their job remotely anyway.
@F40-c4i11 ай бұрын
Those gov officials know nothing about buildings. Not a cheap fix, so not profitable enough for developers. Getting those up to code for apartments costs more than people think. It would take gov/tax payer investment. Ottawa specifically has so many empty gov buildings it’s crazy.
@Mikeeey011 ай бұрын
@@geocam2As mentioned in the video, Calgary is converting 6 million sq feet of office space to residential. It’s very much possible and I know this because the office building next to my apartment was a conversion finished back in 2019 and they completely rented the building out in under a month.
@duolingosession11 ай бұрын
Bitter pills; those public servant can be replaced by AI anytime soon
@shaheryarkhan713111 ай бұрын
@@duolingosessionnot possible bro
@marshallmcluhan3311 ай бұрын
It's about bailing out the failed commercial real estate market. These units will be garbage but governments are offering cash incentives to do it.
@TJMartinek11 ай бұрын
Everysingle person said how it's impossible or difficult to convert offices to apartments and literally every single issue they listed is solvable, many of them a problem that's only a legal problem.
@Ryan-09311 ай бұрын
we need mass zoning reform all across north America. #1 is we should abolish mandatory parking minimums. requiring a minimum amount of parking increases costs for the developer and makes density more difficult. it's a lot easier to build an apartment tower if you don't need to spend tens of millions also building an underground parking garage in order to hit the minimum required parking spaces. this also encourages more walking and bicycling riding. and if developers want to include parking they can build a much smaller number of spaces then just rent those to the people who do want them. parking minimums make low-cost developments a non-starter.
@Ryan-09311 ай бұрын
@geocam2 bollocks, as a office building it contains significantly more persons than as an apartment building.
@doujinflip11 ай бұрын
Not continuously though, only for half a day during the work week. Residential builds are even more demanding on life support because regular people (who are not security and facilities professionals) occupy the building at all times.
@irondragonmaiden11 ай бұрын
It's an economic problem. All of those construction workers, engineers, architects, plumbers, electricians, etc aren't going to work for free or for peanuts.
@EvilMonkey781811 ай бұрын
Of course it can and has been done a little. As they lay out it's simply going to cost a fortune, so rents will be high, as much as luxury apartments in the same areas.
@Greyyyjohnson11 ай бұрын
Now everyone would be forced to look into getting a work from home because we can’t stay unemployed forever
@Lucas_Antar11 ай бұрын
If the office is empty then no one works there already. It would do nothing but open up homes.
@keikofay980411 ай бұрын
@@Runco990 In your view, what do you perceive as "soon"? 5-10 years, 10-20?
@rasul40710 ай бұрын
You are better off unless it’s a newly built apartment building, most of these houses look pretty old and disgusting! “Historic” “Victorian” yeah give me a break..
@SarahGoss-k1n11 ай бұрын
You could adopt China’s model for the homeless and use some to create internet/cyber apartments/pods that the homeless people who make a wage but can’t afford housing can rent for overnight housing. This provides a place for the impoverished while working forward a livable wage. Taking a couple of building and dedicating it to this initiative to cure homelessness for those who have a working wage but not a livable wage. You wouldn’t have to convert to individual plumbing the units would have shared bathrooms like a dormitory set-up etc. This ideal is worth discussing and mapping out pros and cons relative to the population of interest and the social and economical impact.
@greenmachine560011 ай бұрын
Upvote
@AllrightIsee9 ай бұрын
This is inhumane. Practically company towns... What's next? Slavery? Cure homeless addicts and mentally ill, don't warehouse them. Dont invite mass immigration we cannot support.
@unconventionalideas56839 ай бұрын
China's model for the homeless is hiding that they exist, not actually providing housing.
@user-cd3ys6yq9r11 ай бұрын
Why not use them for hospitals,schools,universities and even warehouses for precious metals and expensive jewellery,banks can use them for lockers.
@user-cd3ys6yq9r11 ай бұрын
Just saying.Why not explore.
@portcybertryx22211 ай бұрын
In NyC they actually did this with artist studios, schools and warehouses in the early 2000s. But it requires tearing down multiple floors inside office spaces together the appropriate ceiling height. In other cities companies like extra storage have been using vacant complexes to provide storage solutions to people.
@mohammedsarker575611 ай бұрын
because the housing shortage is the most acute one that's why
@randeknight11 ай бұрын
Regulations. There's all sorts of regulations required for school buildings to the point that only a dedicated build just for schools can fulfill them. It's almost as bad for the conversion from office to residential. Without regulation change, it's often literally cheaper to demolish and rebuild than to convert.
@mikea574511 ай бұрын
We already have enough of those things. Why would we want to use our most valuable downtown real estate for bank lockers?
@Yyhhtt9900911 ай бұрын
I’m glad I still have my side hustles going on because a lot of people are getting laid off either for AI or some other reasons , it’s like the government forgets we also need to live
@pranker19917111 ай бұрын
it is absolutely the governments job, a business has the sole focus of being as profitable as possible. A governments job is to step in and make changes for the better of society.
@meb520511 ай бұрын
So why don't you help them remember then like the rest of the world does outside of the Anglosphere?
@ehwick817511 ай бұрын
@@braticuss un-fortunately it is.
@richb222911 ай бұрын
@@pranker199171where did you learn this? Socialism 101? In a free society it’s the individual’s responsibility to provide for themselves.
@richb222911 ай бұрын
I have been laid off and it wasn’t the governments fault or responsibility. It is the individuals responsibility to provide for themselves. However, it seems like you understand this at least some, because you have a side hustle! And I would bet that you wouldn’t be out of work for long given that!
@hackmattr11 ай бұрын
It's mentioned at the end of the video that you can't make apartments for most of the buildings, but you could use the space as entertainment or hotel spaces........ If you can convert it to a hotel, you could also make it into an apartment.
@duolingosession11 ай бұрын
If wfh would be the new normal culture, chances are people would also spend less staying out the night. Unless that building is located in tourism spot (turn it into tourist hotel) or higher the best designer to turn it into boutique hotel (to be able to compete with big hotel). Best still cafe/resto/ community places
@serebii66611 ай бұрын
Hotel spaces is not hotel rooms. Hotels have large restaurants and convention spaces, service, laundry and circulation spaces. Not to mention, even hotel rooms are not apartments. They lack kitchens, storage, individual A/C control, ventilation, not to mention the fact that all the units would necessarily need to be small studios on the perimeter wall, which still does not solve the issue of the large internal dark space.
@duolingosession11 ай бұрын
@@serebii666 sounds cliche but cafe/resto/community spaces maybe?
@serebii66611 ай бұрын
@@duolingosession the issue with skyscrapers is their vertical distribution of services. This puts community spaces and cafes at a serious disadvantage due to accessibility and interaction. That is by these types of spaces are almost always on the ground floor, at street level - so patrons and passerby can people-watch, and have that level of social interaction. And while there are penthouse level restaurants - that is their entire gimmick, views of the city. That makes stacking restaurants on top of each other, let alone at lower floors a diminishing return since only one will actually have the desirable views and all the others will just be less accessible.
@duolingosession11 ай бұрын
@@serebii666 art spaces with skycraper view? Idk. Must be a way
@Madvizion11 ай бұрын
I see in the future turning most office buildings converted to living situations becoming the new "projects" like in the past. The past is always a guide to the future. Unfortunately humans don't learn from their mistakes.
@virginiamoss704511 ай бұрын
The major difference between office space and residential space is the need for humans to sleep. The safety provisions for sleeping people inside buildings or any structure are vastly different than for fully awake people. All sleeping rooms must have immediate access to the outside, generally through a window if not a door so bedrooms must be located on the exterior walls of the structure. Office space can be just the opposite and often is, so the core building is designed differently, running power, plumbing, etc. up through the interior of the building with little access out from there to the rest of each floor. Residential space needs plumbing throughout and fire codes to accommodate stoves and ovens.
@marblox93008 ай бұрын
Sleeping is a waste of time. Look at all the work that can be done that is wasted by 8 hours of sleep. Humans need to adjust.
@virginiamoss70458 ай бұрын
@@marblox9300 Human beings are far and away the most adaptable creature on this planet. Sleep is a necessity for all animals; major brain stuff is happening there that affects all organ systems. No sleep at all and you die. Chronic lack of necessary sleep will shorten your life and reduce your productivity and happiness. All the brain research in the last 20 years has discovered how critical sleep is. Go read about it, comprehend it, and sleep well. You might experience an attitude adjustment.
@andrewc132111 ай бұрын
I work for a big tech company in a tier 2 city. No one is coming into the office despite the demands from management. Eventually management will give up their office leases. Commercial vacancies will increase soon.
@zachlafond265211 ай бұрын
Where my wife works its like 99% remote. I've heard nothing of them returning to office. I doubt it will happen ever.
@IsaacHozz10 ай бұрын
Power to the workers of the world.
@BradKwfc11 ай бұрын
No worries guys. The developers and investors will convert those to the smallest acceptable apartments with the highest rents possible. Thank you to our financial overlords!
@BradKwfc11 ай бұрын
@theodoreolson8529 Okay Blanch.
@theroldan801311 ай бұрын
they are soo mercyful.....................................................
@backcountry16411 ай бұрын
If they're acceptable, what exactly is your problem??
@ThePeterDislikeShow11 ай бұрын
My boss asked me to return to the office, so I literally did --- to live and sleep as well. I'm not waiting for the conversion.
@toolwithintention10 ай бұрын
I fired my boss instead of going back to office
@lilfrank111411 ай бұрын
Change building code, zoning code, do dormitories to office building, so people share central restroom and shower.... more interactive space share space
@Sweethands411 ай бұрын
What a surprise: those in authority or a position to decide what happens regarding the populace refuse to sacrifice anything.
@L.h3149 ай бұрын
Bringing people in office buildings will be a tragedy. Many of them are not up to the code for living as in a house.
@pianobench631911 ай бұрын
23:13 that is wrong. The cost of construction is vastly lower then the market sets for the price of the office or apartment complex. The market dictates the rent and the final price in the sale of the unit. If we sold office or houses for what they actually cost to build, the real estate and big developers would not be in this business. Placing the blame on the vast majority of the labor that ... yes you have to do work to build the thing ... but the real estate and developers do relatively far less work with far higher hourly rates in order for them to "make their money"
@danrussell_official11 ай бұрын
2020, The first year the pandemic happened - I was thinking the same exact thing. Ain’t no one returning to the office long term. The choice seems clear: either see your downtowns turn into skid rows with abandoned office buildings, or convert/replace those buildings with residential and shopping
@Bigbacon11 ай бұрын
All they will end up with is over priced apartments that no one can afford.
@jaimeperales721911 ай бұрын
3:47.....Did she just say it's silly to have a bathroom in every apartment...wtf lol
@Triring6511 ай бұрын
Just re-zone and create a new mixed zone are like in Japan. Even in middle of Tokyo a single house stands next to a office building. The benefit is you can develop a shopping, residencial, transit station and commercial office in the same walking distance.
@cmk35311 ай бұрын
We a highly regressive vacant underutilized property tax to encourage landlords to convert to housing
@scrafya819010 ай бұрын
Its so funny how these buildings are not available for "home repurposing" but they ask people to spend most of our their lives there. Such a sad system.
@dashdash_peacecampaign11 ай бұрын
The conversion difficulty highlights the ease of building offices space and packing in workers with little regards to people's wellbeing. Apartments need lights and a lot more plumbing, electrical work, and walls and nice fixtures. Office spaces are full of open space and little cubicles and long walks to amenities such as bathrooms, break rooms, and outdoor spaces. I haven't even mention adding politics of adding amenities adding hospitals and schools. Because offices ignore debates of how good the schools are, which can get heating in local politics, too many developers simply prefer constructing offices because it is too easy. Residentials are just that much harder to create. It is much simpler for politicians and interest group to announce new companies moving in to new office space, while families debate about school capacities and rent prices.
@kiwifruitkl11 ай бұрын
It is possible to just live in the window offices and cubicles. The window offices will be rented out per room, and they are higher in cost because they have windows and natural lighting. The cubicles will be much cheaper per unit, selling for just a few cents or a few bucks. There will be 3 bathrooms: men's room, women's room, family room. Break room will be converted into a cafeteria where people can get food and eat inside or outside. Outdoor spaces will be shared.
@12FLASH2211 ай бұрын
kzbin.infoYgoZ5fVzC5s?si=I_3RQvMu4cnoY9oA
@yegfreethinker11 ай бұрын
@@kiwifruitklyou're joking i hope
@breon3177411 ай бұрын
Nothing in this Video Says Anything about Crime or The Open-Air Drug Markets on the Streets People Being Attacked on the Streets in front of their Homes & Business Closing Down Do to Shoplifting. First thing is to, Fix the Crime Issue in the City So People want to Go their 1st.
@jeremypearson685211 ай бұрын
I love the way the mayor of SF talks like it’s such any easy transition. It doesn’t help their homeless issue and many people who can afford it probably don’t want to live downtown. These conversions are not affordable for the average person.
@cykablyat146611 ай бұрын
We kind of don't even know who's It's for. It's for a specific group of folks who want to pay a huge price to live and work downtown in rent & taxes vs just going remote or working elsewhere.
@Krobra9111 ай бұрын
it is easy. like she said many politicians refuse to do it because they are in the pockets of big corps. Not only that but many offices buildings Pre 1960-1970 are convertible to housing, that was a building requirement. but big business came in and removed that with the help the politicians in their pockets, which is why now any building built post 1960-1970 are expensive and essentially tear downs and rebuilds, making it more expensive. 1) Government should help pay for the conversions so developers are able to offer more affordable housing. The only stipulation i would add is that the affordable housing should be perm. right now many new places with certain affordable housing units are temp for a decade or two. If govt pays for 60-70% of the conversions, that would still allow for enough affordable housing and regular rental/purchasable properties for developers to make money. 2) yes, theres no place left to built in SF meaning certain areas that are single housing and underutilized should be converted to taller buildings that are earthquake proof. Ease the restrictions for developers, impose comment #1 and you have a market that is approachable to developers. 3) Change the laws to make future office buildings and reimpose the laws that they need to be built with the possibility of being converted to future housing. This way if office buildings are vacant, you make it easier for developers to turn a profit and help continue building more homes 4) also work with other bay area cities and begin the same kind of conversion. Start spreading out major tech companies, biotech companies and redistribute the traffic flow, money flow so the entire sf bay area gets to enjoy the markets instead of just SF or silicon valley. plenty of easy things, its only hard because the existing politicians make it hard.
@marblox93008 ай бұрын
It's the Great Capitalist End Game that is working so well.
@hyperion3911 ай бұрын
most office buildings are in downtown. If you convert them into apartment then most tenants will not be able to afford rent. If you convert them into flats then they will be more expensive than single family or multifamily houses. Taxes will be more.
@sunshineimperials160011 ай бұрын
But without any commercial buildings, what is the point of living in a city now? The warehouses are gone, industry is gone, and now white collar industries are leaving. I’ll much rather live in a suburban community with nature and plentiful space than a crumbling city of another era.
@sunshineimperials160011 ай бұрын
Cities are obsolete now, and once the leases are up, no reasonable company will want to renew their building leases. And suburbs will adapt to become more walkable, becoming more village-like to appear attractive to people.
@bigbrainweeb784811 ай бұрын
@@sunshineimperials1600Unless the suburbs do a better job with land management and allow for more people to live in those areas with different housing archetypes other than just a single family home, cities will NOT be becoming obsolete anytime soon imo
@sunshineimperials160011 ай бұрын
@@wbay3848 Have fun in your dystopian future then I guess.
@sunshineimperials160011 ай бұрын
@@bigbrainweeb7848 American suburbs were built specifically for sprawling single-family homes, and while improvements are needed, I don’t think people will be abandoning single-family homes anytime soon. I’m sure suburbs will become more walkable however, especially if urban planners get their heads out of their asses and consider anything other than a densely-populated city being the solution to every problem in America.
@sunshineimperials160011 ай бұрын
@@bigbrainweeb7848 And I’m not arguing for urban sprawl either. Just small and simple villages, with a decent and walkable Main Street, alongside some farms, more common areas, and tight-knit neighborhoods.
@kevinwright408811 ай бұрын
An old building can be quickly and easily be converted I believe. The utilities can be provided by Amazon (portable toilet,lanterns,coolers,ice makers,cooler water jugs,battery operated things in the place of outlets,and battery heated blankets with insulation). Good and simple appliances can be installed with the help of Amazon deliver(basin for soaking dishes,bottled water,Microwave,toaster oven,grill,blender,slow cooker,deep fryer, and a burner).
@jeffbergstrom11 ай бұрын
Try renting office space in a big city. Supply and demand suggests the costs should be less. Nope. The property owners still demand huge rents despite a glut of office space available. I do not understand how they think it makes sense. Are they paying taxes on that property while empty and hemorrhaging money? I do not know but one would think getting someone in to pay rent is better than nothing.
@doujinflip11 ай бұрын
Commercial leases are often like 10 years, and there's considerable costs of switching tenants due to the alterations they'll further do to suit their needs. Just taking down their front lobby can be a major undertaking.
@nelsonpun11 ай бұрын
I thought this the other day. It would be a great idea
@Noegusis11 ай бұрын
This video is basically investors this, profits that, muh portfolio.
@alexlucero892811 ай бұрын
5:12 The "green wall modern" renovations look so bad. Art-Beaux is beautiful, keep it that way to match the history of the building.
@jamesbell73911 ай бұрын
It always amazes me that the solution NEVER includes cost controls. Because housing prices are worse than College tuition increases. It's not based on anything other than MORE MORE MORE. Market factors never seem to matter.
@marblox93008 ай бұрын
It's the Great Capitalist End Game that is working so well.
@amop339 ай бұрын
Rack-em,stack-em, and Pack-em, What a way to live. It’s like the dream we all imagined. Just as long as our politicians move into the first apartment conversions, I’m game.
@FrancesRyan-b2p11 ай бұрын
The recession wouldn’t be that had on us if only most people took out their time and finance to venture into investment opportunities, most people live in comfort of savings which won’t cover up for much on this recession
@SandraPatterson-di6xh11 ай бұрын
You are right.!
@SandraPatterson-di6xh11 ай бұрын
That is why I had to start forex trading 2months ago and I now am making benefits from it..
@LexiPatel11 ай бұрын
I'm glad I was introduced to forex trading and got the best teacher and mentor who helped me understand the financial market l'm grateful to Mrs Shanita 🙏🏻
@AnaOliveira-io1hx11 ай бұрын
A common mistake we newbies make is venturing into the market without help and legit guidance
@YongLands11 ай бұрын
O' Yes I'm a living testimony of Mrs Shanita Creswell.!
@lt437411 ай бұрын
Bay Area does not have a housing shortage. They have a high rent problem.
@marblox93008 ай бұрын
It's become too unsafe and expensive to live. Forget kids - that's old school.
@sinistralwing11 ай бұрын
These greedy developers have been bleeding cities dry for decades with all kinds of absurd kickbacks and they want more handouts for conversions? Force these mfers with laws.
@leonie56311 ай бұрын
Compulsory Aquisition of buildings by Government use, just like they do when building freeways....easy.
@GowthamNatarajanAI11 ай бұрын
@@leonie563 There is no Compulsory Aquisition
@GasGenerator11 ай бұрын
Uncertain approvals process, designing with unknown building conditions, upgrading to meet new codes, rejigging the structure, gutting plumbing and hvac, envelope replacement for operable windows and exhaust, redoing interiors...so many cost risks for little savings if any and developer ends up with compromised unit layouts that are hard to sell.
@emptiester11 ай бұрын
Dont forget that yuppies have no reason to be there anymore. What self respecting member of the new laptop class is living outside the sun belt in a downtown area? Count me out.
@AwokenEntertainment11 ай бұрын
sad that so much politics get in between easy solutions..
@junkvista6111 ай бұрын
I see some mix use buildings in my city. Underground parking, 1st floor retail shops or small offices. I think that is best use of land.
@lifevest111 ай бұрын
I can see it now. 500 sq foot "luxury" apartment starting at $1,550 a month, parking and utilities not included.
@unconventionalideas56839 ай бұрын
$1550 a month would be dirt cheap for San Francisco.
@lifevest19 ай бұрын
@@unconventionalideas5683 I heard you can't get a cardboard box on skid row without a 200k down payment out in Sanfran! :)
@TrentSpriggs-n7c11 ай бұрын
Condominiums, mixed use developments, vertical malls, yoga studios, fitness malls, observatories, student homework halls, tutoring centers, start up offices, low cost foreign student dorms, SOHO spaces, ballet studios, ateliers, musician practice halls, retired teachers' clubs, hotels, AirBNBs, libraries, dorms, public dorms for nurses or EMTS or teachers, along with gym spaces are all possibilities, in addition to apartment conversions. Each neighborhood could also have a space for greater connection to City Hall, as well, if laid out as a SOHO type affair. SF would do well to build apartment dorms for their teachers, EMTs, librarians, and nurses. Very low cost would be best for these particular cohorts.
@clintontakashihenrymoore65311 ай бұрын
So now I guess we have to stick to work from homes ??
@mgtowski39511 ай бұрын
Coming soon . . . streets.
@junkvista6111 ай бұрын
Who want to stuck in traffic for hour with the cost of gas and car repairs?
@davefisch-y1t11 ай бұрын
Pretty much
@andreirachko11 ай бұрын
Finally!
@nataliacali8611 ай бұрын
@@junkvista61 Even if gas and car repairs were cheap, why should use time to commute to work when we can do our work from home and use that time to do something that is beneficial for us?
@silentvoiceinthedark566511 ай бұрын
The renters have been so much money, they are not likely to return to the previous model. My company went back to work from office last summer but made it option 6 months later due to attrition. In many metropolitan areas the commute can be 90 minutes each way so that is 15 hours a week that the worker will never get back. Meanwhile the worker is now able to attend meetings across time zones due to the flexibility. Some are not productive with the WFH model and are weeded out.
@mk-oc7mt11 ай бұрын
The fact that this segment hardly featured macroeconomic conditions like inflation and interest rates leads me to believe that the intent of this PR piece is to use infeasible office conversions as leverage to extract wider tax and fee breaks for commercial owners and developers, without much promise that the new residential will be delivered or even possible with changing economic conditions in 3-5 years.
@Joce12311 ай бұрын
How about converting the empty spaces left by companies like Sears?
@adventurewithneen700211 ай бұрын
It’s happening in Sydney Australia as well.
@brentduanefoster11 ай бұрын
It's a worldwide thing.
@leojboby11 ай бұрын
1% centers paying a disproportionate amount of taxes... I would say not proportionate enough if anything. When billions of profits are not made disproportionately off low wages, we can re-evaluate proportionality.
@Phatboy41411 ай бұрын
Convert! If old warehouses can do it so can newer buildings
@winniethebubbly11 ай бұрын
The issue is rent is too damn expensive. If they bring in 10k+ apartments to rent, the apartments are going to be based off market. No one can afford it. They would rather leave the apt empty for months than lower rent.
@Distortion011 ай бұрын
We need accountability for the politicians who kept building these damn things after the demand was clearly gone.
@mentertainment506311 ай бұрын
@2:14 this rich business man shows me the American culture needs to change. Why can’t people be more like japan. Culture matters and housing is about giving people a place to live, not to profit off them.
@KRIPSYNODUTS11 ай бұрын
This is so cool , so when the need for office space picks up they will build brand new buildings, also it solves the housing problem with old buildings.
@JhonnyBoi11 ай бұрын
23:10 “They gonna make sure they get they money” the hood in her was coming out lol
@KCCardCo11 ай бұрын
Empty Real Estate=Tax Shelter
@globalautobahn113211 ай бұрын
Only if you could offset profits that you’re making other areas. But if you’re a sole owner of a building you’re screwed.
@harryharry97011 ай бұрын
As in the interest payments are tax deductable? I often see that argument but an empty office space has zero revenue and still has costs
@nareshpullakandam754311 ай бұрын
Glad they are not forcing employees to turn to office like our Indian leaders and corporate lobby to keep the high real estate prices
@moralesmedia428211 ай бұрын
Something tells me that this is more about keeping certain people out of certain areas than a logistics issue. Expensive project with lots of opportunities for years to come? Why wouldn’t an investor do it?
@maddscientist317011 ай бұрын
Make them mixed use ..street level retail, pharmacies, delis, etc., etc., 'X' amount of lower floors business..upper levels residential. Turning commercial to residential is not easy...some cannot been done at all, some cannot meet code, some are plain toxic. What is worse is the "construction pollution" of empty buildings, malls independent businesses in the Suburbs of the metro areas of cities
@DSLightning2111 ай бұрын
COVID revealed that WFH or hybrid work arrangements are feasible and preferred with employees, especially with high commuting costs (with time AND money). It's definitely a new competitive advantage for work flexibility, and any company that doesn't embrace this advantage (hybrid at minimum) will lose deals with job applicants from here on out. 🏢🤷🏻♂️
@advancetotabletop532811 ай бұрын
Exactly. Also, WFH is cheaper for businesses because they‘re not paying for office space. Job applicant pools become *much* larger and applicants will take a lower pay to WFH!
@advancetotabletop532811 ай бұрын
Exactly. Also, WFH is cheaper for businesses because they‘re not paying for office space. Job applicant pools become *much* larger and applicants will take a lower pay to WFH!
@jontalbot111 ай бұрын
Been doing it in the UK for years
@kellykramer762911 ай бұрын
The conversions would also employee a lot of people. 👍🏼
@12FLASH2211 ай бұрын
kzbin.infoYgoZ5fVzC5s?si=I_3RQvMu4cnoY9oA
@irondragonmaiden11 ай бұрын
The problem is, is there enough money to do such expensive conversions? Or would it be cheaper to just bulldoze it and start from scratch?
@kierstyngodenzi-stanard481311 ай бұрын
Connecticut should be closely listening to this. Do you have any idea how much Hartford could change if this was implimented???
@YanBrassard11 ай бұрын
I learned in this documentary that zoning is done at the state level in New York. This is insane. I don't even know why the state would fight against giving the power back to the cities. The state employees are probably doing the best that they can, but there are certain things that need to be addressed at the most local level and zoning is one of them.
@kimberlycrichton293210 ай бұрын
1. analyze per building into feasibility of conversion; 2. if cannot be converted, can it be turned into schools, university halls, hospitals; 3. use parts of buildings with windows into farms, as Singapore does; 4. tear down any building which is empty and useless; 5. so that inner cities end up with more open space.
@archerbob684711 ай бұрын
Converting buildings is indeed not as simple as it sounds as these buildings were designed with a single purpose in mind and thus the building is designed around that purpose with regards to its construction, its living and dead weights. The sad fact of the matter is that in the past it was a thing to over-design/construct a building, but now with budgets so tight that sort of overkill in the design/construction of a building does not happen and thus converting a building from one purpose to another is generally not possible unless someone is cutting corners and making a death-trap
@pacificdragon111 ай бұрын
Easier said than done. Construction workers would have to tear up the floors and walls. Basically gut the building in order to run plumbing, dedicated electrical panels for each living space. Install insulated walls and doors.
@quartytypo11 ай бұрын
It won't work. Offices are not designed to be apartments. All the hotels in Las Vegas are tall and thin. That way everyone gets a window. With office buildings there will be a majority of windowless apartments.
@michael02811 ай бұрын
One issue with San Francisco is that fewer people want to live there. So no point in converting to residential units that will not sell.
@tomb555211 ай бұрын
SF is a one of a kind location that can’t be duplicated. It will always be desirable.
@michael02811 ай бұрын
@@tomb5552 it’s a great city yes. Hopefully someday it will return to desirability where people want to live there. But at this point, folks are prioritizing their own safety.
@Opalsdad11 ай бұрын
Sucking up soooo much space, just empty is better than housing Americans?!?!?!? WTH 🤦 😢
@eliteoutlaw321011 ай бұрын
People need wages to keep up with production and profits. Corporate greed is out of control
@junaidisalam571811 ай бұрын
it's sad and scary to think about how many a merican businesses failed and relocating abroad... those vacant office buildings says it all...
@davidmikeystars11 ай бұрын
Or more people are working from home and not making people commute to a city downtown to work on a computer all day is a good thing.
@StanleyKubick111 ай бұрын
real estate should serve people, not the other way around
@JeremeyHowlett11 ай бұрын
How about lowering the rents so artists and freelancers can have large studio spaces to create.
@AJ_roadway11 ай бұрын
They don’t want to do lol they make billions in taxes from those businesses
@Wyrd__One11 ай бұрын
That won’t ever be a thing again. The boomers could do that, but god forbid we ever get even half of what they were handed. The “greed is good” mantra from the 80s is permanently embedded into the culture now
@marblox93008 ай бұрын
@@Wyrd__One We Bommers weren't handed anything - it's just that Capitalism has taken a satanic turn downward.
@MsJuani1969Wiggins11 ай бұрын
Sooner rather than latter space is going to become more suitable to other situations rather than offices. I wouldn't be surprised if didn't blend together.
@jessepower11 ай бұрын
I cannot get past the downgrade at 5:11... Did they take the marble out for reuse somewhere else, or do they think people prefer stinky carpet in high use areas...
@Avantime11 ай бұрын
It's a resident-only communal gym. And given how so many people with gym memberships don't actually go to gyms, my guess is that foot traffic is much lower, and carpets makes it more cozy for the residents, along with tasteful decor.
@jessepower11 ай бұрын
@@Avantime whenever I go to the gym, I always think “I wish this was more cozy” Oh wait, no I don’t.
@Avantime11 ай бұрын
@@jessepower That's the difference between public and private gyms. Hard marble denotes a public area potentially accessible to the riff-raff.
@Ol-T186411 ай бұрын
I can’t believe this hasn’t been shouted from the roofs as soon as the market shifted
@gsssbsbjdkfdmjd11 ай бұрын
The investment you choose isn't right or wrong, just depends on the kind of business person you are or simply the kind of person you are. However, the end game is investing money long term creates wealth every time. Just pick what you like and understand, invest and it will pay off. A lifetime of investing for 5 mil is not hard to accrue.
@gahshdsjdndnjd11 ай бұрын
Investment is the quickest path to financial freedom, the rich stays rich by spending like the poor yet investing! While the poor stays poor by spending like the rich yet not investing. it is good thing to start your Financial freedom this year with good investment idea
@JK-zw8ec11 ай бұрын
The problem in these cities is high rates of crime and tolerance of dope addiction. No one wants to live in an area with high rates of criminal activity and psychotic, dope addicted people living at large on the streets. Also, the filth and public health hazards are a major deterrent to living in these cities.
@rcpmac11 ай бұрын
In SF many residential units ( homes and condos) are owned by investors and operated as AirBNB. This is significant and goes unmentioned.
@nashville298311 ай бұрын
How about affordable housing for middle class?🤔
@Ryze25511 ай бұрын
They would rather leave them empty than convert to regular apartments. They will only cope with city-luxury apartments, in total denial that remote work takes away the need for city-luxury apartments. I love watching the greed system fall apart.
@gyroscopejones921711 ай бұрын
Remember when they used to humiliate us for not living in their cities
@St._Peter11 ай бұрын
London Breed couldn't be more wrong about affordable housing. Her assumption that any new housing is "good housing" completely ignores the need to address the driving factors of wealth inequality that lead to the current housing crisis in American society. Adding thousands of new unaffordable "Luxury" housing units doesn't help the issue. The grim reality is that there is no financial incentive for private equity to increase housing supply. Increasing supply would only bring home values and (possibly rents) down. Private equity and retail investors alike do not what their held value in housing stock to decrease and that is one of the main reasons there is a deficit in the first place. The only realistic solution for solving the housing crisis is an investment from that state, local or federal subsidies, to build new affordable housing and regulate it similar to the programs in place in Vienna Austria a city that has managed to provide quality housing at much lower rates than places like SF or NYC. The "Free Market" American Neoliberal system is failing miserably in front everyone's eyes. Corrupt Politicians like Breed need to be removed from office and replaced with individuals whom create policies that deliver material improvements for their constituents.
@humbugswangkerton997211 ай бұрын
From an electrical/mechanical perspective, its a lack of room for more conduit/piping/duct risers (vertical pipes ) within central locations that lead to main electrical/mechanical rooms in office buildings which makes things prohibitively expensive. Perhaps city planners should mandate/incentivize developers to design larger vertical shafts for future retrofit to residential?
@marshallmcluhan3311 ай бұрын
This is all about bailing out the commercial real estate market. They know these buildings are useless now and converting them is mostly a pipe dream. It's a soft landing for commercial real estate investors while the tax payers pay their useless property.
@GrazianoAltieri11 ай бұрын
What if we allow BnB and hospitality structures being only in converted offices?
@Cballin11 ай бұрын
converting office space in retail spaces isn't a bad idea either
@beedee823811 ай бұрын
The need for retail spaces has been trending down for years.
@doujinflip11 ай бұрын
The demand isn't there, at least not until there are residents nearby (ideally in the same building).