What would happen if you choose the worst settings on BMPCC OG?

[@SebastianRVF-ln4jg]

Actually been really wondering about this, thank you! i wouldnt personally shoot in raw in all situtations so good to know that the footage still looks amazing in prores

[@SLYCENDYCEmakesaMOVIE]

I’m thinking of selling both of my OGs but then i watch stuff like this and I’m like ill keep it just in case lol

[@jamesmckenzie930]

Great video. Excellent info regarding the artifacts in the proxy footage. Thanks for sharing.

[@my_visual_playground]

Interesting video. I really don't need this camera, but watching many videos here, I WANT to have one for my free time 😂 What lens you used here?

[@sweetsmakemeshredded3672]

Same here xD

[@axelfoley133]

This matches my experience back in the day. LT was compact but imperceptibly lossless compared to HQ for simple grades. However, a real torture test would have been to turn the ISO up to 1600, because that brings more noise into the mid-tones and shadows. The proxy codec would fail much worse, because that noise becomes extra details that it can't handle. LT still works ok though.

[@iamlookingatyouthroughtheglass]

Yeah, LT is the lowest I would go personally.

[@ivanshafiq2915]

great info

[@OrangeNooob]

this nudges me to find and buy BMPCC OG as addition to my Pocket 4K as "travel and everyday camera"

[@ihassan1001]

After all these years I still use my bmpcc 4k and it still amuses me with the images it spits out

[@salvatorepuglisi2465]

Kingston SDG3/512GB SD (512GB SDXC Canvas Go Plus 170R C10 UHS-I U3 V30) Does this card work with the BMPCC og?

[@FilmSpook]

Great tests, thanks, and that know-it-all in the comments below is full of 💩when it comes to this video, for this is NOT "useless info" at all for a newbie interested in the BMPCC OG. I've had my BMPCC OG for a new years, but found this very useful. 😅Many Thanks.

[@yisuscarrillo3913]

Whats the difference between record on film or video setting? Thanks ❤

[@axelfoley133]

On RAW, no difference. But on pro-res, it will dictate which color profile gets saved to the video. Film saves the log profile for post-production grading. Looks grey and bland but you can grade however you want. Video saves the Rec709, which is more usable without editing (has decent contrast and saturation), but has less room to play and tweak.

[@iamlookingatyouthroughtheglass]

Yes, to simplify what @axelfoley133 said - Film is a Log profile, flat and desaturated giving you the most range and flexibility in post. Video is graded, meant for delivery straight out of camera or with as little tweaking as possible. In RAW you have no other options, but to shoot with Film profile. In ProRes you can choose.

[@yisuscarrillo3913]

Thanks :3

[@fourth1000]

Is this footage uprezed?

[@iamlookingatyouthroughtheglass]

It's edited on 4k timeline and rendered in 4k to avoid YT compression , but I didn't use any superscale in Resolve

[@momentum.archive]

максим здарова! спасибо за детство удачи на западном ютуб поле

[@iamlookingatyouthroughtheglass]

Спасибо!

[@OrangeNooob]

lmao, seen your post on reddit and saved it to come back later and watch the video what do I see on my front page of YT 10 minutes later? you're goddamn right, this exact video :D nice curious bit of "funfact" information that is othervise useless, love this type of stuff (genuinely, no sarcasm here, I'm just as stupidly curious person)

[@iamlookingatyouthroughtheglass]

Ha-ha, you're welcome!

[@FilmSpook]

@OrangeNooob Incorrect, this is not "useless" info, buddy, it is VERY useful for a newbie to know this information, and even some more experienced filmmakers or videographers could benefit from some of this info if new to the BMPCC OG. 👍🏾👍🏾

[@FilmSpook]

@OrangeNooob Remember, every camera is unique and different, and thus even a seasoned pro with other cameras may benefit from this information regarding this camera if new to the BMPCC OG, in regards to how well it may perform under certain conditions and settings.

[@OrangeNooob]

​@@FilmSpook well, I get your point, BUT this video is more of "HOW BAD IT CAN BE" if you fckd up and did this to your camera and footage - you already know, because you tried to salvage at least something to not go and re-shoot. If you did not - you generally know that "bad settings are bad" and "you need right exposure/lights/etc/etc". So this exact video is "fun but nothing more". Yes, now I know that it's not THAT bad, but if I'd captured something on this camera - I would do everything in my ability to make most out of situation and produce the best image I can. And this video is quite the opposite, thus I say it's more "fun" than "practical".

[@choppergirl]

60Mbs per second? R U Serious. Talk about serious bloat. I don't need that kind of bloat. Most of my 1080p music videos after fully rendered and uploaded to youtube... the entire video of 2 minutes... takes 60MBs. These camera reviewers need to focus more on 1080p, because it's what most everybody on the internet is going to upload to KZbin. Can you upload higher resolutions? Sure. Is anybody going to watch anything higher than 360p on their smart phone over a cellular connection. No. 2K or 4K? Forget it. 99.99% of people are not shooting to make a film to go in an IMAX movie theatre. I've made 500 video uploads to KZbin... and I've never color graded a single one, and I have no particular interest in starting. My cheap goodwill monitors aren't even color calibrated. That's the street reality.