What YouTubers DON'T TELL YOU About Ai Side Hustles...

[@WholesaleTed]

👋 POLL: Do you think ChatGPT should be shut down & destroyed in the lawsuit? 11:39 🤔 YAY ✅ or NAY ❌

[@Meloyadina]

❌ nope

[@wamcelot1807]

NAY ❌

[@rh619]

NAY

[@qqqcalls]

No, its not illegal to read the NYTimes as an individual and create derivative work from those readings so it should also apply to AI.

[@musicziggurat24]

I demand to destroy the New York Times instead of ChatGPT 😄

[@themeparkamusement2214]

Sarah it has been a few years and you have not aged a bit. Keep up the good work. I can't wait to go thru all the videos i have missed.

[@hypedplays3447]

I have to say love your work ^^ Somebody who covers this type of content in my opinion has to be real and truthful. In the last 10 days I'm researching more about this topic and came across many content creators talking about how easy it is, only for the reason to promote their codes/apps/deals/courses to benefit from the average watcher hoping somebody will pay and they will get their commission. Here I feel the opposite. in every video Sarah will clarify about commission or sponsors, reassuring that nothing will control her judge. Keep up your good work ^^

[@gaiustacitus4242]

The phrase "you may use Creations outside of the Online Services for any legal personal, non-commercial purpose" means that businesses may not use the service to create images for any purpose and individuals may not create and sell images. It's really very simply for any lay person to understand such terms of use.

[@gaiustacitus4242]

AI generated content cannot be stolen because it is not eligible for copyright protection. AI content can be reworked into a derivative works or reused in its original form.

[@Dreamingofyou317]

That’s only ai content that had no human touch points like randomly generated synthetic data not stuff you might make with it. This video is not quite right because the whole thing is in flux worldwide

[@BeInspiredByPrettyThings]

Great video. I spent 4 hours generating, tweaking and retweaking an image Dalle created for me. Knowing how to prompt AI is the real skill. Would LOVE to see more content on this!

[@sarah345]

lol! Yeah, exactly the same as making art. Except the years of practice and training. People act like artists are gate keeping art making by trying to keep AI from stealing our work. We’re not, just put ten thousand hours into it like I did and you’re welcome to use my art as inspiration. Until then I guess you can keep repeating the mantra that coming up with ai prompts takes skill too lol (it doesn’t) and I’ll keep supporting real artists.

[@BanXxX69]

You say artists are not gatekeeping it, but then you way I‘m just allowed to use it after putting ten thousand hours in - THATS EXACTLY WHAT GATEKEEPING MEANS😂😂😂😂

[@donbedwell2322]

This video is very helpful! thank you for putting this out.

[@KerstinMcKitrick]

Excellent video. I was wondering about copy right issues. So appreciate this info.

[@stevemash7505]

Thank you, a lot of valuable information here. Perhaps you can interview a lawyer in a future video who can help us make sense of all of this?

[@EcomCarl]

Great summary on the complexities of AI-generated content and copyright! Entrepreneurs need to navigate these legal waters carefully, especially when considering AI tools for creating commercially usable content. 👍

[@luminousdragon]

So there was a guy who made a graphic novel with ai. it was determined that the individual pictures the AI generated were not copyrighted, but the effort he put into arranging the photos etc were. It would be like if you were in say 2015 before AI and you used a bunch of photos from shutterstock to make a graphic novel. you dont own the rights to each picture, but no one is allowed to sale the book you made.

[@weirdtuberjournalism9757]

You have earned my subscription through your hard work and dedication, I look forward to your content.

[@MillyAlej]

Thanks for the information very helpful.

[@bkucenski]

One of the use cases for Chat GTP I recently discovered was working with old books. I had it modernize the language in Brer Rabbit. It was not originally written in a way that sounded like contemporary black authors like W.E.B. DuBois, Malcolm X, MLK Jr, etc. And another book was only available as a pretty lousy scan. I used Adobe Acrobat to OCR the scans and then had Chat GTP correct it. Even with half the page missing sometimes, Chat GTP no doubt has access to better archives and filled it in without skipping a beat. I did have to watch it because it started hallucinating and I had to start a fresh chat to get its brain working again. And it modernized language too much sometimes and I had to put back key phrases for impact. I don't imagine the whole AI ecosystem is going to implode but the government will definitely be putting bumpers on it. And if you're making money, hire some real artists. They can definitely plus what AI is putting out. Robots are for menial tasks, not expressing the human condition.

[@rowdycowboy85]

I subbed to you years ago when you were with a different company, don't remember the name now. Moved away from what I was doing at the time and later tried to find you again and couldn't. Wondered if that would ever happen but your video was just suggested! Subbed again :)

[@WholesaleTed]

It's great to have you back! I didn't change my company, but I have changed my content. I used to be big into dropshipping so you may have initially found me through those videos. But the covid shutdowns made international shipping really challenging. I pivoted more into print on demand because you can produce items locally and ship domestically and it was definitely the right choice for me!

[@rowdycowboy85]

@@WholesaleTed That's fantastic! Yes, years ago (2016/7) I had a dropshipping store briefly. Your channel used to be JV Zoo right? Remembered that name when I woke up today. Sounds like you made the right pivot, that's great to hear!

[@WholesaleTed]

This channel has always been called Wholesale Ted, but JVZoo is a different website for affiliate marketing so you have a good memory! I remember it too, I think that it might still exist.

[@rowdycowboy85]

@@WholesaleTed Ahhhh ok, that's probably what it was. You must've been making a lot of JVZoo content back then and I probably associated that with your channel name, which wasn't right lol. So glad to see you again, Sara! Always thought you were pretty :)

[@MysticMary-g9s]

If an AI compilation is created that comes from your thoughts and then you modify it in Photoshop adding effects and add a font that you have the paid commercial rights to, do you think that can be copyrighted?

[@martint4629]

Excellent Video. Thanks. What a minefield!! Additionally, if someone uses a Freelancer who unintentionally infringes copyright or provides misleading data (by using inaccurate or copyrighted AI Output to fulfil Gigs) then anyone who pays for, then uses, the Freelancer's 'Gig Output' without first undertaking their own due diligence, could end-up in deep-water.

[@JessicaAshlera]

Confidence in Revux increased; just added more to my holdings!

[@ThaisCavalcantiSous]

Growing belief in Revux vision with every bit of information learned.

[@automaton111]

You can safely ignore the terms of Microsoft image creator. If AI images have no intellectual property protections then that includes Microsoft

[@WholesaleTed]

Well so, I'm not a lawyer, but that is where I find the TOS confusing. If Microsoft don't own the copyright to the images, how can they then tell you what you can & can't do with the images, once it is off of their servers? As a layperson, I don't understand how they could enforce their TOS! Not that I'm saying anyone shouldn't follow them. I just don't understand how they are enforceable.

[@automaton111]

@@WholesaleTed Exactly! Plus if you alter the image, turn it into a vector, use it as part of a larger design, etc. then I don’t think it will be a problem for you in practical terms anyway. Microsoft won’t hunt you down. I’m living dangerously over here with Bing 😂. If I had to pay full price for open AI, I would be bankrupt by now. It is so inaccurate that it takes hundreds of images to come up with one that looks “real,” and open AI paid version is not unlimited image generations.

[@galaxia4709]

@@WholesaleTed What I thought too, they shouldn't tell what people can and can't do with the images

[@saulgoodman2018]

@@WholesaleTed MS never said you can't. It was on MS answers. Which 50% of the time, they give out wrong answers.

[@subreezy]

they images they generate are never perfect anyway they have to be altered

[@TrekkersTravels]

Always great content and awesome videos

[@ThomasDavider]

Expecting significant developments soon, given Revux top-notch team!

[@davidthescottishvegan]

Another fantastic video Sarah and yes any of the results that show up after using AI you need to make sure that you can use them under copyright law. Love 🥰 the video and love 💞 Sarah.

[@NarcNerd11]

Sarah, Thank you so much. You always watch out for us.

[@WisdomVibes10]

You inspired me to create this channel. i uploaded 3 videos that could go viral and already seeing results . Appreciate the fantastic work, keep it up!

[@alida0076]

I think AI becomes so integrated this will not be disappearing. Thanks Sarah, love your video's. !!

[@UnkulunkuluEl-u8i]

I stumbled on your video and it's going to save me $2,000 for which at this moment form what I know I don't have. I'm going tomorrow start putting everything in motion. I appreciate what you've done and what you are doing.

[@nonyadamnbusiness9887]

I absolutely agree with the copyright office. It's bad enough that corporations have personal protection under the law. Giving machines personal legal protection would be idiotic.

[@Zuluknob]

AI doesn't just spit out good images all by itself, it requires a human guiding it by adjusting the prompt. I take it you have never tried to get a good image of what you actually you want out of ai.

[@MysticMary-g9s]

@@Zuluknob agree! Being a good prompter is an art in itself.

[@sarah345]

@@MysticMary-g9s lol! No it isn’t 😂 it may seem difficult now but people used to say the same thing about using search engines. That it was a skill. Now a 5 year old could do it.

[@raymondreddington3440]

I love yo ur channel , am now subscribed and hoping to be successful as a Faceless Creator . Thank you so much

[@echopeakbicycling85]

The AI can come up with text or images that the writer, or artist, can use as reference. Like an initial draft, or sketch. Not to be presented as the finished work.

[@PronounsAreHerMajesty]

That’s what I do. I use it for reference. 👍👍 My art is very particular.

[@LoisJacquelyne]

Impressed with Revux development progress; been tracking it closely!

[@MortonMcCastle]

Thanks for a new video, Sarah!

[@WholesaleTed]

Thank you, I hope it was interesting to watch!

[@mahmutbatuhankabul3542]

(I am a law student) In a law perspective problem about AI based creations cannot be protected in the world under any legal system. This is because of definiton of "work" in copyright law. In the law there is a some needed criterias to satisfy any creation as "work" and give a copyright protection. 1- Original works for authorship When law authority looks at your work, the work needs to have originality. Originality can be defined as having an essence of your own in the work in question. In the AI work we cannot say there is an essence of you in the work. 2- Fixed by author This means work should be recorded by you or other agents who are under your authority. For example, a work is fixed when you write it down or record it. 3- Tangible form of expression The work should have a concrete form like in paper or digital form in the hard drive. And you need to share that work people. When we look at these basic criterias AI works cannot satisfy orginality.

[@deanm9652]

You can't use images from Canva for commercial use. Why do people still promote that in 2024? Oh wait I'm sure she has an affiliate link in the description.

[@Lisatruck]

It's not that simple. You can use Canva if you create a unique design with it. You can't sell designs, images or fonts from straight from Canva that you haven't created a new design with. There are KZbin videos from Canva itself that explain this more clearly.

[@BillBaran]

There's an extra part to that bit about AI art being non-copyrightable. It is not legally clear what amount of modification needs to be done to make it copyrightable. It would need to be considered "transformative", to then be protected under fair use. Fixing blemishes I doubt would be considered transformative.

[@flickwtchr]

Thank you for pointing this out, as it is a very important distinction to make. I've pointed this out before as well. I believe Etsy has similar language concerning selling AI generated art on its platform.

[@ZyzyxVile]

Thanks, this is currently the only correct answer in the comments. People keep confusing things like Copyright, Personality Rights, and Terms of Services. These are not equal laws / protection / agreements. Currently you can't claim copyright over a work created solely from artificial intelligence. The key word being "Solely". But the jury is still out when it comes to iterative or orchestrated human co-involvement. Not to mention it would be difficult to prove one way or the other in a court that a person didn't have a majority in a creation. AI and algorithmic generation has been used for a few years now in Music Production, making things like chords, drum beats, vocal samples, much quicker to lay down and those artists still get to claim total copyright.

[@RenitaHildare]

Revux low presale price is a steal - time to load up!

[@scotttovey]

Thanks for the update on AI news Sara. I think you're the only one that does these reports.

[@gmilkboy504]

Question is high ticket dropshipping a scam?

[@Meloyadina]

Absolutely the Ai Apps will add up if you use a lot of them. I only paid for Eleven Labs & D-ID as I'm teaching myself to get comfortable with scripting and hearing my voice, but won't be keeping them long term. I use GPT free, Co-Pilot & Gemini to help with brainstorming. Just don't try to be lazy when using any Ai app.

[@scotttovey]

"I'm teaching myself to get comfortable with scripting and hearing my voice," Why not just create an audio Bible. I don't think anyone will sue you for doing so and that's a whole lot of material.

[@ostapbender7528]

Thanks for the informative video. Hmm... 4:45: so I am not breaking Microsoft's Terms of Use by commercially using an image generated by Bing Image Creator?

[@pubgiant24]

Love your channel, Sarah. Been watching for years. So- I have an Etsy shop, over 1k sales. I use MJ for my designs. Very distinct and intricate. I noticed the other day that another shop has my exact, EXACT design on their shop (its a poster). Is there any recourse? Thanks

[@adrianhardcastle9297]

Don't forget that copyright gives you the right - if you have it - to defend it in law, but again YOU have to defend it not the govt and it costs you money! Bigger firms with bigger lawyers stand a better chance so if you put up something on ETSY/Red Bubble/Fine Art America and someone says they've got copyright they will take it down, ETSY/Red Bubble etc will not stand up for you against a big firm with big lawyers - just not worth it - so in this case even if you are legally in the right they will back down and remove your product - so best to avoid as much as possible and use your own intellectual property for a sustainable product

[@janagrobbelaar278]

You are correct with AI not always giving correct information. I myself, tested this too. When Gemini was still Bard i jumped on there to see how accurate it would respond. I asked it a few questions regarding certain law and tax things in South Africa (Bard not knowing that i actually already did my own manual research and knew the correct answers to the questions i wanted to ask it). It gave me several incorrect answers that could have misguided me and gotten me into some trouble if i went on what it told me. When i told Bard the information it supplied me was incorrect and i told it what the real answers was, it instantly said "oh sorry for the mistake, you're actually correct" and then spat me the correct information by looking into the info i supplied it in my correction responses. Be careful using AI for certain things guys! It can get you into some trouble if it gives you the wrong information and you just run with what AI told you. Do your own manual research too.

[@audriusmentorius]

Hello from the past Sara❤ Nice to see you again darling ❤

[@WholesaleTed]

Lovely to see you too, on this chilly Wednesday morning ⛅

[@raytvmy]

Is it legal to use Microsoft Edge’s Read Aloud feature for voiceovers in my videos?"

[@Lastchance2030]

HI Sara, I have been watching your vids forever and it's insane that you still look like an 18 year old! Awesome vids by the way. A quick question do you happen to know anything about dropship lifestyle company? just curious about your thoughts. CHEERS!

[@WholesaleTed]

Haha, thank you, I wish I was 18 but sadly, I remember playing N64 so I am NOT 18 anymore! LOL! I don't know anything about them sorry but I think that, like me, they got a Shopify Coach Badge when Shopify offered it to affiliates. To get that, I had to verify the earnings I was claiming at the time of getting my badge with Shopify themselves.

[@HalkerVeil]

In that case, every artwork created with any computer tool like a brush effect, or sound device with VST's can't be under copyright, because a human didn't create it.

[@SamuelGarret]

Presales remain my go-to, and Revux is my latest pick. Early birds catch the worm!

[@ForageGardener]

Its not illegal to write a fan fiction. Its not illegal to computer generate a fan fiction Its not illegal to train your children on 10,000 books and then ask them to write you a story based on the characters in some of those book. Its only civil issue (lawsuit) if you SELL copywritten content. You can produce it all day. There are gripes to be said about AI but these aint them

[@me-myself-i787]

If that was true, there would be no need for stuff like the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, since everything it allows you to do would be legal anyway. And the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs licence would be unenforceable. And people wouldn't be sued for downloading songs through BitTorrent without the copyright holder's permission. All of which are certainly not the case.

[@FlightinDarkness-eb7uh]

not sure why your free book to download comes with a detour to pickup my name and email and then a pay offer then you get to download it im probably not reading something right but great teaching

[@WholesaleTed]

Hi there! Just to clarify, my ebook is 100% free - it costs nothing. You have mistaken my optional video course, The Ecomm Clubhouse, for my ebook, but they aren't the same - they are different and my ebook is free (the course is not). I am also transparent & honest in my videos that to get my ebook, you need to put in your name/email. I show the signup form for the ebook in my videos visually, and I show the name/email form as part of this so that everyone does know that if they'd like my ebook, signing up with a name/email is required. By the way, if you registered for the ebook and you couldn't find it for free in your inbox (it is emailed to you after you sign up for it) we can send you a new copy.

[@WholesaleTed]

Just email the channel at [e-mail]

[@brentkillian]

I also did a quiz through an ai platform. It gave me wrong answer

[@littledovecitydust]

Are you going back to the side hustles you tried after a period of time? It seems you have tried a lot of gigs and if all of them continue to work after you're done with the video, it would be awesome.

[@WholesaleTed]

Honestly I haven't really tried many side hustles. I'm someone that knows what I enjoy & I stick with it. I enjoy creating products & I enjoy creating KZbin videos - so I stick to doing those 2 things. But because I know that not everyone enjoys those 2 things, I will discuss alternative side hustles on this channel. I encourage everyone to read my channel description because this channel isn't a personal channel where I share my life, it's a channel about side hustles & online business in general. So I discuss a lot, so that hopefully, people will find the ones that are right for them, even if it wouldn't be right for me 🙏

[@littledovecitydust]

@@WholesaleTed appreciate the honest response. It seems that doing multiple side hustles can actually be counter productive with the time. It's best to stick to one area and dig deeper into it.

[@ismailachouden1908]

I like your channel you are one of my favorite KZbinrs that I like and can ask about some questions if you'd like because I have a problem with my work online thank you for your honesty and these facts about AI

[@stephenwhite5444]

If you modify AI content it's still not copywriter, someone else can still steal it and use it. That's why the guy in the beginning of the video couldn't get a copywrite even though he co-created the picture with Ai..... similarly when you generate with AI then edit it, your content can be used by others.

[@tiffanybell303]

Chat got all the way because it is still up to the creator to either site their work fat check double check and such chat. GPT is a tool and it’s the users responsibility to be responsible with it.

[@tommylee9586]

Sara, Great video. But I have a question. If an image is made on Bing image creator, and changed in photoshop or canva, how do they know it comes from Dall-E 3? Is there some kind of code in the image?

[@WholesaleTed]

As far as I'm aware, they have no way of knowing. Which makes including this in their TOS very confusing to me, lol. I honestly don't know how they could ever enforce it, even if they wanted to enforce it.

[@sarah345]

Yes, they are working on adding something to the images that the computer can see but you cannot. And it can’t be cropped out. If you don’t believe me, look up Nightshade. It changes the way the AI sees the image without changing what a human sees, it’s amazing. It’s used for poisoning AI data sets.

[@thanesbusiness5001]

you brought up two contradictory points. ai content can't be copyrighted and ai companies restrict usage. both simply cannot be true. i don't understand why people aren't suing the ai companies that claim they can restrict usage when their content is public domain. am i missing something

[@WholesaleTed]

Well, it's interesting. These are international companies. And copyright law is handled individually by different countries. Just because ai images may have no copyright protection in the USA, doesn't mean they won't be protected in other countries.

[@thanesbusiness5001]

@@WholesaleTed Good point, sounds like a legal can of worms.

[@5ANDkano4LiFE]

Anyone that hasn't put in years of dedication to attempt to master a creative topic will side with the corporate AI tools.

[@queenofswordspodcast]

Those programs though that they run artwork through to determine if it is AI are not that great. I had a classical painting from the 1400s from a famous painter tagged as AI generated.

[@zabavnaya-xt8tb]

Love the accent 😅 🎉🎉🎉

[@ArjayMartin]

It's Chinese I think? lol from across The Ditch.

[@thomascraig6814]

If you create an online influencer and then edit their photos heavily can you copyright your influencer and their photos?

[@Vengeful_Goan_spirit]

No matter what you create with AI, any layman has every right to claim that legally. AI doesn't legitimize your artwork and you will have a hard time trying to get a copyright for it for good measure since AI generated content is basically stolen images.

[@SenorJuan2023]

My focus will be AI side hustles this week!

[@WholesaleTed]

Awesome, congratulations on taking action! 💪

[@letfreedomring7684]

Hmmm... so in the case of AI, it seems that it is a good thing that I am not an early adopter of new technology. Basically, it just comes down to not having enough time to get to it. Thank you for the advice, Sarah. Much appreciated as always! 🙂

[@FlightinDarkness-eb7uh]

OK i appreciate the ebook is free sorry for the misunderstanding you do an exellent job trying to teach everyone ill buy the video course when i can

[@EnglishScore]

So, using AI voiceovers can theoretically null your ownership of any materials you create that incorporate those audio files?

[@princy-fc5gs]

no, actually you can edit ai voice to make it monetizable... it's not that hard...and it also will sound natural.

[@EnglishScore]

@@princy-fc5gs but, if i use an app to generate text to voice sentences and use them in content, can this be flagged as copyright even if from a paid service? or are you suggesting that the generated voice needs to be 'further' modified? sorry, i'm not clear on this

[@AmeliaDoherty7777]

Ai helps giving instructions and tips I pray people recognize Adept-limited some day as the best remote side hustle

[@ismailachouden1908]

Do you know guys even Netflix use IA in movies Like in "what Jennifer did" tv show

[@Bentlyxox]

But who gave you anything less than 5 stars for a FREE ebook? Some people are so ungrateful 🤦🏻‍♀

[@DavesTravels-uk]

Do you know if grumpy cat image was originally AI, because it is trademarked meaning you cannot use it. Around 500 redbubble designers are being sued for using grumpy cat images, what are your thoughts on this?

[@WholesaleTed]

Grumpy cat is a very old meme, and the creator of the meme has been protecting their IP for many years because they actually monetize it. Memes are illegal to resell because the picture/photo is still owned by the creator of it. Most people who have photos that become memes choose to ignore that, but they could at anytime choose to enforce it, like they are. It was always incredibly risky to sell meme photos that you don't own the rights too, and since the Grumpy Cat IP holder had the right to the image, they have the right to sue the people trying to sell it on Redbubble.

[@glaceRaven]

I'm not an expert on Grumpy Cat by any stretch of the imagination, but here's what I do know: The Grumpy Cat was a real cat named Tardar Sauce, who had a face that just looked naturally grouchy. By all accounts she (yes, Grumpy Cat was female) was actually a total sweetheart irl. She had more than a couple of media appearances outside of the meme (even starring in a Christmas movie that I have heard was kind of mediocre), so we know for a fact that the image was not generated with AI. She sadly died several years ago, so I think it's absolutely right for her owners to not let other people profit off of the image of their late cat without permission.

[@GwynneM]

As with any tool, it's about how you use it. And as with any tool, there will be some people who use it for illegal purposes. A hammer is legal. A hammer is a very useful tool. A hammer can also be used to do very illegal things. Doesn't mean we stop using hammers. We just make sure we're using them for legal things, not illegal ones.

[@SaundraLee]

Siding with GPT and AI, on the sole basis that if they were successfully sued & shut down; by rights, Bard and Gemini would be sued for copyright BY OpenAi. OpenAi is the original Ai start. Bard and Gemini would have to explain where they got the idea for their AIs, since theirs came later. To which, leaves us with NO AI, if that went down. It's almost like shooting yourself in the foot, in a way, to me.

[@flickwtchr]

LLMs like ChatGPT use transformers in their architecture, and that transformer architecture was originally developed at Google. Why hasn't Google sued OpenAI?

[@SaundraLee]

@@flickwtchr good question. It's wonderful and surreal to me that, after only ONE YEAR of Gen Ai, companies are suing & accusing each other on ... *who started all of this & * who owns the output!!

[@EduardoAzevedoDias]

For the next bull run, keep an eye on DOT, VRA, SOL, and don't overlook Revux RVX.

[@chaisewallis7110]

Use Canvas cliparts??? Last time I was trying that I remember them not having clear usage rights written for this so no thank you

[@himanshu9996]

Mam creating a crash course on print on demand business using a free tools for creating t shirt design without any copyright issues. Because I am creating tee public account and using ai for creating T shirt design my account was 4 times banned. I am sad 😭. I think about that quit this print on demand business. But i am interested in work so please help and give the suggestions. Which i can apply in print on demand business. Thanks

[@seban678]

Yes, using AI in the wrong way will get you into trouble. A wrong way to use AI, for instance, would be generating art with it and then try to profit off of it.

[@JonnyD-gl7cn]

Problem is, AI does not yet create true original stuff. It blatantly plagiarizes and copies and pastes.

[@Nclk619]

No protection as it should be.

[@jenntruax5023]

Side with chat GPT and AI . It's no different than artists and writers reading and using inspiration from others to make their work.

[@asionec]

Same, complainers are just grasping for anything to keep a job when they should just learn to use it.

[@saulgoodman2018]

Yep.

[@Varkoroth]

Well, it depends. I’ve seen some situations in which the AI does a full-on copy of something else, which is basically copyright infringement. If you do not check the generated content and add your own touch on it, you can land in the same boat. So you simply need to use it as a tool, then customize the result with your own touch to make it unique and you’re all good.

[@flickwtchr]

That is just such a bogus argument that gets repeated, and it isn't even close to an intellectually honest comparison.

[@CVE42287]

Yes it is, if you know much at all about neural networks you wouldn't be making this comment. Weird AF tbh.

[@JippieP]

I side with freedom! thanks the vid

[@flickwtchr]

Whose freedom? No one asked artists for instance, whether it would be okay to train these models on their copyrighted images so that the AI developers could make a commercial product. Seems to me, someone's "freedom" was trounced on.

[@Recursosdodigital]

Thank you Sarah for this information,i still prefer to make works myself it makes me use my brain,instead of using Ai brain😅

[@Sh4dow682]

Is that they are just as hard to build up as any other YT channel.. yeh the AI make it easier in the work sense but to be seen and gain subs is just like any non AI channel.

[@wayIess]

Ai just needs to be regulated. I follow crochet and knitting circles and there's a ton of scammers on social media and Etsy. It's ballooned fast in the past 6 months. People just see dollar signs, aren't being ethical and are ruining the hobby. Ai could be a good tool, but people suck.

[@robertallen8449]

Hi Sara - big fan of your videos, thank you for sharing your advice and techniques. I followed the steps to create a POD store on Etsy and successfully published several ads from printify to Etsy. Then out of nowhere they banned my account. I don’t know why, as it was just ai designs made in midjourney printed onto t shirts. What would you say is the next best alternative? Selling directly from Shopify? :) thank you again for the content

[@WholesaleTed]

I'm sorry to hear that! First of all, appeal it. This ban I showed in this video, I appealed it & within 3 days Etsy gave my account back. However, before I even did POD on Etsy, I was doing it (and still do) with Shopify. I have a video coming out that will discuss what I'd recommend doing with an Etsy perma ban!

[@adamfroman7983]

Seems like crazy laws. AI could be considered the media here even with art and such.

[@flickwtchr]

What's crazier is when people don't recognize that traditional artists whose copyrighted works were used in training without their consent have no legitimate grievance.

[@mrzwerusa]

I love Adobe Firefly ❤

[@Shewolfadoodle]

Thank you❤❤

[@pagefifty-seven4795]

Starryai gives you 5 free credits a day. I'll collect them and play 2x a week there. I don't much like Canva's ai generator. Ideogram ai art gen is fun. Playground starts you off free. Firefly is ok. Good luck New York Times! LOL. And I've been given an inappropriate answer by the Bard dude. You are always so informative, Thank you!

[@ronnetgrazer362]

Not a word about locally run or open source solutions...

[@WholesaleTed]

I specifically do talk about Stable Diffusion, which is both locally run, and open source, I highly recommend watching the whole video fully through without skipping over any sections 7:43

[@ronnetgrazer362]

@@WholesaleTed Sorry, I missed that! My 3D printer was spazzing out so I might be able to blame it on that. Or maybe not, this kind of criticism often comes back to bite me. 😔 BTW, Llama 3 seems to be actually good enough to help with brainstorms and agentic stuff, without paying per token.

[@gaiustacitus4242]

Anyone who believes in morality and justice must side with the New York Times and others who are suing AI companies for the illegal use of their material, because the original authors and owners of the content are not being compensated when AI creates derivative works based on their original content.

[@youdadsaad]

Hey weirdo I loved your channel very inspiring. I have question I just started new channel with this profile account. I got 4k 5k 10k 9k on my Frist videos but suddenly stop getting any views? Just 150 views 60 views and the last one stock on 0 views. Can you get me your honest opinion on this problem, it's a bit frustrating to think you going to be successful than everything turn into nightmares just few days later. (I only posted shorts)

[@thelilianarey]

Loved it.

[@adamfroman7983]

Any prompt you give is the Human part.

[@flickwtchr]

That's not what the law recognizes is it?

[@saulgoodman2018]

"Submit an appeal"? It does into a blackhole, and you will never hear from them.

[@WholesaleTed]

I have had TikTok overturn a ban for me. But it is pretty scary because they have no real way to be contacted compared to most other companies!

[@ChewieM81]

Big company: you can’t use ai for this Also big company: uses ai for that

[@123rororose]

Is this really true omg they can sue 😢

[@technofeeliak]

This makes no sense at all. If I use a pencil to make a drawing, it doesn't matter that the pencil was manufactured in a factory. It doesn't matter that I'm not making finger paintings. If I use Photoshop, I'm using software to create and manipulate images. If it gets to the point where I can enter code myself to have images appear as I wish then that's just the advancement of tools. From fingers, to pencils, to Photoshop, to artificial intelligence. It's product is the outcome of my actions using software. So in that way, you have created something yourself and it should belong to you. If what AI generated was the same no matter who commands it, then of course. If I would say... make me a bear in a t-shirt, and you would write the same commands and we would both get Winnie the Pooh every time, then no one should be able to claim the intellectual property this way. You would be getting exactly the same images, so there is no novelty. No invention. It's just software, made of code, producing something on demand. If you're trying to keep people who use pencils from losing their livelihoods then that's motivation. You're not guided by reason to say that one tool is more legitimate than another. If there exists a range of intelligence, then there also exists more than one approach to achieving a goal. I don't see any justification to say that Photoshop is any more legitimate than artificial intelligence in that way. Consider how commercial kitchens work nowadays. Most of what's done by chefs is reheating. Need a fresh French baguette? Just pull it out of the freezer and let it thaw for an hour. The baking has already been done. Technology! What I see across all concerns in all aspects of life is a struggle for meaning. Is the outcome of hard labor something of equivalent value to something that's achieved smartly and more efficiently with less investment of time and energy and materials? No. But the market will decide what its value is none the less. If an artist pours themselves into their work, and over a period of a lifetime are able to achieve something of the highest quality, that's special. Much like an athlete who breaks a world record at the Olympics. So if you can make spectacular artwork with your computer and a few written instructions, that's something many other people could do. If you have a meager budget, you would likely choose the least expensive product, especially if the quality is the same or better. That's what is happening here. If you have a choice you normally don't want to make unnecessary sacrifices. My warning to you is this... without meaning, without struggle or sacrifice, there is no love or passion. If the human experience offers no inspiration, then we are not on earth to have a living experience that tests us. And instead, we're just waiting to die. If we are made happy, owning nothing, and are just being farmed, then doesn't that make us like cattle? Moo! Your work gets you paid, but that money isn't worth anything. Your talents give you a sense of accomplishment, but anyone could realize the same outcome with simpler means and a much smaller investment of their time and soul. Jobs become scarce, and everyone lives on universal basic income. You own nothing, there is no objective, and life is pointless. Your religion/morality is rejected. Your values aren't currency anymore. You can't exchange words, or sensibilities. There's no reason to share in life because everyone can get the same or better on their own without having to tolerate your quirks or you their quirks. Good times maybe, making weak people who create bad situations.

[@Nclk619]

Not per month. It is per year

[@Father.Beocca]

AI is currently priced like the old cell phone plans. Everything is expensive but years from now, they will be a dime a dozen. Sadly, millions can be made now, not years from now. Double edged sword.

[@epicnamepwns1242]

I'm not going to offer advice on how to do it but you can trick AI bots into giving answers on topics they've been instructed not to.