Who are the Turks? Origin, History and DNA assessment

DNA assessments: ko-fi.com/ancestralbrew/commi...

[@Kheliks]

My ancestors are from the Kayı tribe of the Oghuz, who migrated starting from 1071 and remained in small villages (Eskisehir) in Central Anatolia until 1950, isolated from the outside world, very small village surrounded my hills&mountains ... My grandfather passed away at the age of 96. They were settled there by the Seljuks during their time, and they never left that place. He told the stories of Central Asia and the times they migrated have been passed down from generation to generation. he told me when i was 10 years old, ''we were nomads and come this land via seljuks, tell our stories to next generation like those before us'' . The entire village is related to each other and resembles Central Asians in terms of appearance...I checked old ottoman registry, my grandpa was right about past and genetic roots. I live in Istanbul right now, people constantly asking ''are you korean/ tatar/uzbek/turkmen'' ? due to my asian eyes :)

[@user-cg2tw8pw7j]

You are the original Turk

[@Alprtngakrc]

​@@user-cg2tw8pw7j There doesn't exist a concept like original Turk from biological sense. All haplogroups exist from much earlier times than any known ethnic groups in the world. No genes are patented and licensed to one particular ethnic group. There is no Greek or Turkish or Persian DNA. Turks just like the rest of ethnic groups in the world have very diverse biological ancestries from both maternal and paternal sides since they appeared as a distinct ethnic group in history.

[@user-cg2tw8pw7j]

@@Alprtngakrc No, the original Turks look like this man, but you are Iranians, Kurds, Greeks, Romans, Georgians, Armenians, and a small minority that is almost a lender. They are the original Turks.

[@Alprtngakrc]

@@user-cg2tw8pw7j There doesn't exist any original Turks. Even the first time they appeared a disticnt ethnic group they had This is scientifically established fact. Today many of the Iranians are the Turks assimilated by Persian speaking people who originally came from India. Those BMAC people are forcefully assimilated by Aryan invaders coming from India. Those people weren't originally Persian speaking people. Their culture an civilization was completely wiped off by the Indians speaking Vedic language. Linguistically speaking there is no real evidence regarding Indo-European roots of Iranic people. The language of Avesta in Iranic people and the language of Veda in Indian people are very similar to each other and Veda thousands of year older than Avesta.. Most probably what happened was these Indo-Aryan people coming from India conquered the remnants of Sintashta people who didn’t move to east and north after subjugating BMAC people and imposed their language on them. From there this language was imposed on the populations in Europe who had much less crowded populations back then and that’s how Indo-European languages emerged.

[@user-cg2tw8pw7j]

@@Alprtngakrc Aryans and modern Europeans lived in Mongolia, Siberia and Central Asia

[@Paradis333]

As a Uzbek, when I visit Turkey, I don’t face any difficulties in understanding Turkish people, of course there are some differences in pronunciation but I can get by

[@tengriaslan2423]

Don't worry, Tengri hear all your voices that's why send Tengri Kut for Turk enemies to destroyed all around 4 continent lands was owned by Bilge Kağan. Bilindiği üzere Stalin rejimi Türklük ve Turancılık fikrine ve Türk coğrafyalarının bir çatı altında toplanmasına müsaade etmedi. Bu davaya yakın olan bütün aydınları, dini ve milli liderleri toplu olarak katletti. Bütün katliamlar 1936-1945 yılları arasında farklı zamanlarda değişik Türk cumhuriyetlerinde uyguladı. Bu hadiselerin baş aktörlüğünü Stalin adına NKVD, daha sonra da KGB istihbarat servisleri yaptı. Bunlardan biri de 1993 yılına kadar saklanabilen ve Kırgızistan’ın başşehri Bişkek yakınlarında bulunan “Ata- Beyt” toplu mezarıdır. 138 kişiye ait bu mezarda kurşuna dizilerek öldürülenlerin çoğu Kırgız Türkleri olup; aralarında Uygur, Tatar, Kazar’da vardı. Bunların arasında Türk dünyasının meşhur yazarlarından Cengiz Aytmatov’un babası Törekul’da vardı. Katliam, Bişkek şehrinin yaklaşık 30 km dışında bulunan Ala Dağların eteğindeki bir tuğla ocağında gerçekleştirildi. 1938’deki bu katliamın bir de şahidi vardı. Tuğla ocağı bekçisi Hıdır Aliyev... Aliyev, saklandığı yerden inleyerek can verenlerin çığlıklarını duydu. Ölmeden önce, bugün Issık Gölü’nde yaşayan 80 yaşındaki kızına şunları söyledi: “Kızım! Kireç ocağında çok büyük bir katliam yapıldı. Şimdi bunu kimseye söylemezsin. Zaman ve zemin uygun olunca bunu herkes bilmeli” diye vasiyet etti. Bu hadiseyi, Kırgızistan Cumhuriyeti 1991 yılında tam hürriyetine kavuşuncaya kadar kimse öğrenmedi. Kırgızistan 1991’de Sovyetlerinden ayrılıp hür cumhuriyet kurulunca, katliam hükümete bildirildi. Kırgızistan’ın ilk Cumhurbaşkanı Askar Akayev bu duruma bizzat el koyarak 1993’de kazı başlatılması için gerekli kararı çıkardı.

[@xdd87]

Seljuks were %35-%40 Asian and were between Uzbeks and Turkmens autosomally. They didn't look like some Han Chinese. All Turkics are Eurasians. A mix of West and East Eurasian. Modern Turks have %7-%22 east Eurasian ancestry. Thus modern TURKS ARE %20-%45 Seljuk. If you don't know anyting about genetics it's not my fault. Also our non Turkic part is not a monolith either. Modern Anatolian Turks have only %35 ANF ancestry. Hittites had %60+. So no we are not same people with ancient Anatolians at all. A simple calculation of Turkish west Between Medieval samples in Vahaduo; Target: Turkish(West) Distance: 0.6720% / 0.00672047 31.2 KAZ_Kipchak 30.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC 16.4 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine 9.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC 8.0 IRN_Hasanlu_IA 5.0 Levant_Sidon_1800BC

[@yeterhalatci9705]

You see kurds or syrian immigrants, bro

[@bir_cumle]

maşallah bize :)

[@selindenizcebi9952]

That is sure that Turkish are very genetically diversified, because I am originally from Trabzon and our ancestors came from Crimea Ukraine. This means that we have mixed with all a lot of people.

[@selindenizcebi9952]

@Arif anddd tatars are Turkish

[@dronur6194]

Türklerin hepsinin çok çeşitli olduğunu düşünmüyorum.

[@altanata5060]

i am also one of those from mother side (my mother is from trabzon as well) , on father side all migrated from ottoman bulgaria to sakarya. so yeah when people ask "i basically am from the black sea area" i say :D

[@selindenizcebi9952]

@@altanata5060 😹😹same here

[@bilimuzayveilgincbilgiler2250]

@@dronur6194 orta Asya'da kalanlar hariç çok çeşitli

[@maverikmiller6746]

Thanks for this video.

[@AdultThirdCultureKid1971]

My ancestry on my father's side, as far as I know, is North and West African, possibly Arabian Peninsula, the Caucasus and Central Asia.

[@christophalcmeonides8537]

Your intro demonstrates clear insights on the subject Congratulations!

[@victoriaballard7354]

Very informative narrative. Thanks.

[@billrener4897]

Mehmet Oz,MD, is a popular American doctor and television personality. His DNA test showed him to be Ashkenazi Jewish. I think the truth is that Ashkenazi Jews, like myself, have a lot of Turkish blood. In the year 740, a group of Turks converted, the Khazars, became Jewish. Centuries later, they migrated into Poland.

[@bantorio6525]

... I visited Türkiye last year and I'm fascinated with all I saw, the people, the food, the architecture, the language ( I even started studying Turkish ... it's so difficult though ... ), the geography ... etc ... I can say that I felt safe and welcome ... Istanbul is a jewel ... I want to go again. I had been in Ephesus, Izmir, Kusadasi ... beautiful places and a lot of history ... Greetings from Miami ... !!!

[@albalb6409]

A lot of story,but not turkish story. More ancient that a mongol turkish people come in those territory

[@bantorio6525]

@@albalb6409 ... jealous ... ??? ... are you jealous ... ??? ... of course you are ... !!! ... and you have a reason ... !!! ... Türkiye is awesome ... !!!

[@tengriaslan2423]

😂Costume of the Asiatics : Pants The only people you would see wearing pants were the ‘barbarians,’ and pants didn't get invented until men tamed the HORSE. Sometimes these pantaloons were made of the skins of animals ; at others of rich and fine tissues embroidered or painted in sprigs, spots, stripes, cheques, zig-zags, lozenges, or other ornaments. Sometimes they fit tight, at others they hang loose and fall in large wrinkles over the shoes. The Classical Greek did not even have a word for ‘trousers.’ 'Barbarian' meaning was :non-greek speaking.

[@tengriaslan2423]

Not a single Greek, Latin (Roman), Byzantine, Arab, or Persian author ever claimed that the Scythians spoke Persian (Iranian) language, although many of these writers have stressed the finest details of their everyday life, culture, beliefs, customs, and habits. Especially important is the fact that Herodotus, whose information is routinely used by the Scythologists, was a native of the Asia Minor city of Halicarnassus, in one of the ancient Persian satrapies, he could not fail to distinguish the Persian (Iranian) vernaculars from the others, especially since he visited Persia and not once met Iranians outside of Persia. However, Herodotus never says anywhere that the language of the Scythians was Persian or Persian-like. He writes that the Scythians and Sauromates are related tribes, close in way of life and language, but cites very little information on their language, but even that limited information, as we shall see below, confirms the paradigm about the Türkic-linguality of the Scythians." Scythians, Balkars, and Ossetians K.Laipanov, I.Miziev Origin of the Türkic peoples

[@beyoglu-cj6lg]

@kikap2242 the Greece that you imaging has been died very long time ago.the majority and even I can say almost all of them(Greek people) are gypsy people now.

[@Yarenoglu]

I did a bit of an extended research into this, since there is very little information available on the surface. The reason it's so hard to pinpoint the exact ancestors of the Turks, is because there isn't a single ancestor, we are a mixed people. Most historians agree that the Ashina clan is definitely at least one ancestor of the Turks. The Ashina were a nomadic people from today's China. They lived around modern Pingliang. Ashina was first attested to in the year 439, as reported by the Book of Sui: on the 18th day of the 10th month, the Tuoba ruler Emperor Taiwu of Northern Wei overthrew Juqu Mujian of Northern Liang in eastern Gansu, and 500 Ashina families fled northwest to the Rouran Khaganate near Gaochang (Bayingolin area today). Here they encountered the Tocharians (who lived in Tarim Basin) and joined the Goache (göçebe) Turkic tribes that were migrating from the North West, Altai region (they originally came from around Crimea and were probably related to the Schytians. They lived between the Black Sea and the Altai mountains and were migrating east). Ashina mixed with the Goache tribes, and then for an unknown reason (possibly through a defeat and subjugation as was common) joined the Rouran Khanate. Rouran was a more mixed tribe made of many ethnic minorities like the Xianbei (ancestors of Mongols) and Tungusic people. This brings us to the Xianbei, which is another part of the Turkic ancestry. Xianbei were nomadic people from the North East, from Korea and Siberia regions, one of the most notable Xianbei federation is the Tungusic people. So, Xianbei came from the North East, Goache came from the Nort West, and the Ashina came from the South, around the area between Tarim Basin and Ordos Plateau is where all these different people met and mingled with each other. They mixed with each other, and at one point, the Ashina overthrew the Rouran dynasty and founded the Gokturk Empire. It's important to know that there were other Gokturk tribes and confederations that coexisted with the Gokturks, and were usually crushed by the Ashina. The Oghuz was one such confederation, they were later broken up and incorporated into the Gokturks. So, although Ashina's Gokturk empire might be the first one recorded in history thanks to the Northern Wei documents (who were a Xianbei dynasty themselves) they weren't the only ones or probably even the first ones. Ashina was just one tribe, but the Goache, and Xianbei, were a whole confederacy made of many people, and when they all mixed with the Xiongnu, Xianbei, Tocharians, Goache, etc, there were dozens and dozens of Turkic tribes and confederations small and large. We didn't even touch the other confederacies such as the Dingling which were a Turkic confederacy of horse cart nomads that is believed to have travelled more from South West maybe from around Iran or India to China. We just happen to know more about the most famous one because that's the main one we have written evidence of primarily.

[@almazchati4178]

Turks don't have anything to do with Chinese. At least from 700CE they were forbidden to mix with them. Turks originate from Caucasus and Volga/Ural region. They expanded out of that area to the east to Altays, and to the West.

[@weirdcoredreamcore9808]

@@almazchati4178😂😂😂😂

[@NazaninExplore]

what an amazing clear & fun video ❤

[@Turkic-X]

The famous Turkish thinker and scholar Hoca Ahmed Yesevi has a saying: Turkishness is destiny, religion is a choice. What I want to say is that Turkish is a race and it contains many different religious beliefs, can you imagine it from the Siberian steppes to Central Asia, from the Balkans to the Danube river, from the Ural mountains to the Finnish steppes? We can give a few examples of this: Gökoğuz (Gagauz) Turks or Sekel Turks living in Moldova or the regions of Romania close to the Hungarian border The Sekel Turks or Cuman Kipchak Turks in Hungary are Christian Orthodox or Christian Catholic. Turks in the Balkans generally adopted the Anatolian Bektashi tradition. Various Hungarian Turcologists stated that Hungarian is of Finno-Ugric in terms of linguistics and of Turkic origin in terms of genetics. Sami Group in Finland One of them is not to mention the Finnish Tatars: ) they already belong to the kuman-kipchak branch of Turkishness. Let's come to the Khazars, Karaites and Karaims Turkish Group. These groups are generally accepted as Jewish Karaim, Caspian and Karaite Turks living in Poland, Ukraine and Lithuania in the mountainous regions of Azerbaijan and Khazars of Karachays. The Turks living in the Altai Khakasya and Yakut, istan regions, which are considered to be the homeland of the Turks living in the Siberian region of Russia, generally continue to believe in Tengrizim (Shamanism), which is the first belief of the Turks. As a note, Greetings and Love from Turkey to everyone reading this article. Thank you for this video you made.

[@gerasimos2112]

Wow men

[@efaloji1026]

there is no source that Hoca Ahmet Yesevi sayed that. its an internet illnes.

[@user-vo5mf3ly9s]

Tell that to the Christian people who concreted how free... choice they had...

[@CeciliaPeng]

My grandfather was from Tuva, Russia. He had light blue eyes. Through Google research, l have found out -just a few months ago-that l am without any doubt Turkic, although l do look Mongolian or Chinese.

[@noftraX]

Ne mutlu Türküm diyene

[@herneyse11]

Welcome to family.

[@IchijoTorukojin]

@@herneyse11 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@yo2trader539]

Real Turks are Northeast Asian. Rus/Slavs generally killed men when they invaded.

[@delly41]

my grandfather has iceblue eyes, one of my aunt and my dad is little dark skin like me, biggest aunt is look like russian blonde and blue eyes, my brother look like tatar my sister is cotton white skin with green eyes ,my nephew is blonde and blue eyes, we mixed

[@TanvirAhmed-ik4gl]

Very informative & interesting 👍🏽

[@chengezhussaini1464]

Do you accept raw dna files and their analysis? Do you accept PayPal payments? Thanks!

[@savvasavraam8670]

Great video!

[@sapphyrus]

The thing with Anatolia is that its local peoples never really went anywhere. From Hittite Empire to Persian, then Greek colonization to Roman times, locals adopted the culture of whomever in charge over time and mixed. Considering that the incoming Turks were in effect a minority since Anatolia has always been a highly populated region due to its capability to support living with farming, fishing, water sources and such, the current DNA composition isn't that surprising. It's kind of like what happened with Britons followed by Romans, then Angles, Saxons and Normans in England.

[@Alprtngakrc]

Anatolia wasn't a highly populated land when Seljuks seized the control there. Its populatian was widely reduced due to plague of Justinian which hit Anatolia multiple times from 541 CE to 750CE and it's thought to wiped off some 75 percent of Anatolian population. Moreover continous wars with Sassanids, Arabs, Seljuks as well as the expeditions of crusaders not to mention the several civil unrests dwindled the population furthermore and forced the bulk of the population to move the coasts on the fringes of Anatolia. Those Anatolian populations and Turks were living in totally different geographical locations except a few cities. Turks were living in the interior parts of Anatolia while the native populations were living coastal cities behind the castles and they had very little interactions with each other. Turks were definitely not a little minority in Anatolia and many of the Turkish tribes escaping from Chingiz Khan's invasion of Central Asia came and settled in Anadolia in the 13th century. According to the European traveler Marco Polo who went to Anatolia in the 13 century Turkmens had already the overall majority in the entire Anatolia as early 13th century. In Marco Polo's map Central Asia was called "Great Turkey" and Anatolia was called "Turcomania" (Turkmens' land).

[@matrixxx3662]

@@Alprtngakrcnny how the genetics of modern Turks is closer indigenous Anatolians than the conquerors. Which makes them assmilated Greeks, Armenians, Assyrians, Iranians , Balkans

[@Alprtngakrc]

@@matrixxx3662 Just read my comments below. I answered these types of question you asked now.

[@matrixxx3662]

@@Alprtngakrc Thats a theory you have not at all based on genetics.

[@Alprtngakrc]

@@matrixxx3662 Yes it's based on genetics. I just can't post the link here because then the post will disappear. But it's definitely based on genetics. It's more than this. It's an established based on all the genetic samples available regarding Turks.

[@gurkeschurke6667]

I myself am from Trabzon our geographical location is very mountainous which leads to very isolated communities, which means that every village could have a vastly different genetic admixture. Including the fact that villagers rarely married outside of their village.

[@bitter_truth8646]

Are you Pontic?

[@subutaynoyan5372]

Yeah my family is from around there too. When you think the generic Trabzonian, you think a person who speaks in an accent that's derived from Mufti accent. With Greek tonalities and such But mine are from Dulkadir migrations, strictly Turkic accents that has nothing to do with Trabzon or North Eastern Anatolian Trabzon's people are strictly sunni muslim, but mine is alevi with a ton of shamanistic faiths and beliefs etc. And these people are supposed to be from the same province.

[@korhandemir-tf2hp]

*Bilim: İnsanlığın Atası TÜRK..* lütfen resmimi açın

[@gurkeschurke6667]

@@bitter_truth8646 I think you meant if I was Pontic Greek / Roman. To answer your question, No I’m not.

[@simyager955]

@@bitter_truth8646 I am also from there, there were Pontus people there, but everyone there proudly says they are Turkish, including me. We have Greek speaking relatives. this is a very interesting but beautiful thing

[@karamelamu]

This sounds more truthful than the presented vidio , thank you for sharing

[@umitaltay465]

Informative video !!

[@mikei7498]

What’s your opinion on when and where Yamnaya / R1b fit into all of this? Thank you for your time!

[@arianjahani2952]

In fact, the science of archeology and genetics has shown that the kings of Gok Turks were Iranian, Gok Turks were a combination of several races and ethnicities, especially the Indo-Iranian tribes, the Pashtuns of Afghanistan are descended from Gok Turks.

[@danaackerman8807]

​@@arianjahani2952its totally false

[@danaackerman8807]

​@@arianjahani2952they were from samoyedic ugro finic tribe

[@peenko9233]

haven't you covered the Turks before?

[@ismailozer3298]

Yorum ve bilgileriniz gerçekçi ve ciddi görünüyor,lakin altyazılı olamazmı,teşekkürler

[@cathymorrison8683]

I would love to have my DNA investigated!

[@godfreyzilla8608]

I recently discovered an ant colony in my back yard. I was watching hundreds of ants coming and going from the same hole in the ground. I couldn't tell the difference between one or the other. If a superior race of beings visited the earth I suspect they would hover over us and think to themselves "Hmmm, look at all of those ants."

[@user-gk6sh7fd5i]

Fire ants are the superior race

[@godfreyzilla8608]

@@user-gk6sh7fd5i : Ha Ha - I stand corrected.

[@homelessjesse9453]

Yeah. Turks are basically a hybrid of East Asian and those from the Caucasus. Basically, it's what someone would look like if a German and Chinese had a kid.

[@BPS12484]

More like a mongol and a greek had a kid

[@bhasan8510]

This video pure gold.

[@mathildaflower2388]

This is very interesting, how much are your dna testing services sir?

[@yusufpolatkesen8468]

My family are Turkmen from birecik urfa, and according to the great professor Ilber ortayli the oldest form of Turkish spoken in turkey is in birecik urfa.

[@teknul89]

Is it true the Turkish you guys speak from Urfa is similar to the Syrian and maybe Iraqi Turkmen Turkish too ?

[@hakanozaslan9571]

@@teknul89 My family is from the Barak tribe in Gaziantep, which lies directly on the Syrian border. I know that our tribe used to live in Nevsehir but were exiled into the Syrian desert and various parts of the Ottoman Empire (even Bosnians with the surname Barakovic can trace their ancestry to us.) But back to your original question, there is a dialect continuum between the Antep dialects and the Türkmen dialects in Aleppo/Halep. The Türkmen spoken in Iraq is more of a transitionary dialect between the Turkish spoken in Turkey and the Azeri dialects in Iran.

[@teknul89]

@@hakanozaslan9571Yes but all those Turk from Iraq and Syria came from Turkey before when there was Ottoman Empire, Seljuk empire and Mamluk time but was sent to Syria and Iraq for expanding their Territories Both people do not identify themselves as being Turkmen from Turkmenistan even though the real Turks from Turkey came from Turkmenistan but the Turks from Syria and Iraq they should have went back to Turkey where their culture is more alike That’s interesting because your Tribe Barak seems to have come from Khorasan before they came to Gaziantep which they left in year about 1382-1383 they were part of the tribe of Uzun Hasan he was the leader of Aq Qoyunlu (White Sheeps) this tribe it used to be Alevi until Uzun Hasan death Feriz Bey became their leader he was also called Firuz or Fürüz bey he was a Sunni and converted this tribe to Sunni Muslims and 4 thousand Abdal tents led by Ashik Dedemoğlu migrated to the vicinity of Yozgat in Anatolia. The tribe had problems with Ottoman Empire so they sensed them to Şanlıurfa, Akçakale in the most southern place in Şanlıurfa province Feriz Bey proposed a return to the land of Ajam and Turkestan, with the unanimous support of the tribe's elders. together with Ashik Dedemoğlu, he traveled to Iran to negotiate a migration with the Shah, who accepted the proposal. But the ottomans were trying to tax the tribe and Baraks they fought ottoman and was mad at them for what they did to them I never knew the Turkish Soup Ezogelin it came from your tribe it taste good 😊 I don’t know about the Bosnians about that I don’t think it has anything to do with Barak tribe must have been a coincidence because if you look at famous people who has that last name they have that and they are not from Turkey even some Croatians have this last name too

[@ahmetuslu4328]

Hindistan’da kaç ırk var ? Binlerce tanrı her ırkın ayrı bir tanrısı olmasından mı geliyor? Hindistan etnik sorunlarını çözebilir mi? Bu konularda video bekliyoruz.Ha bi de amerikanın ırkı ne çok merakla video bekliyoruz..

[@fabbeyonddadancer]

Does he has academic specialization in population genetics z?

[@narlycat]

Did you make this video on your phone? If you did that might explain why the visuals cut out 10 seconds in, so don't use your phone to make videos they always get scrambled, I notice it a lot in KZbin shorts.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

The number of nomads of Turkic origin that migrated to Anatolia is a matter of discussion. According to Ibn Sa'id al-Maghribi, there were 200,000 Turkmen tents in Denizli and its surrounding areas, 30,000 in Bolu and its surrounding areas, and 100,000 in Kastamonu and its surrounding areas.[25][26]According to a Latin source, at the end of the 12th century, there were 100,000 nomadic tents in the regions of Denizli and Isparta.[27] According to Ottoman tax archives, in modern-day Anatolia, in the provinces of Anatolia, Karaman, Dulkadir and Rûm, there were about 872,610 households in the 1520s and 1530s; 160,564 of those households were nomadic, and the remainder were sedentary. Of the four provinces, Anatolia (which does not include the whole of geographic Anatolia but only its western and some of its northwestern parts) had the largest nomadic population with 77,268 households. Between 1570 and 1580, 220,217 households of the overall 1,360,474 households in the four provinces were nomadic, which means that at least 20% of Anatolia was still nomadic in the 16th century. The province of Anatolia, which had the largest nomadic population with 77,268 households, saw an increase of its nomadic population to 116,219 households in those years.[28]

[@sucveceza156]

Ya kardeşim her yerdesin ya HER YERDE. Nerede Türkler ile ilgili yabancı bir video görsem yorumlarda sen varsın.

[@aliklc1970]

​@@sucveceza156doktor kendi haline bırakın dedi

[@mehmetyusufkaradeniz]

@@sucveceza156harbi ha 😂

[@KoroushRP]

@@sucveceza156hes a troll with like 100 accounts

[@sanramondublin]

Can you really rely on these numbers from 500 years ago? It seems too accurate for its time. I heard one citizen of Turkiye did his own genetic test and found out he is 90 percent Greek. He became so depressed and committed suicide. Are citizens of today's Turkiye that brainwashed and chauvinist? I hope that story of Suicide is a lie. .. California.

[@anthonyderosa7730]

Hey I took a DNA test and after a whole life of thinking I was pure Italian the test came back with heritage in Greece turkey Iran and Iraq. I'm looking to do a deeper test to kind of close in the main 2 between my mom and dad I came from.

[@middleeasternforhire8985]

I'm Iranian and I'm not Turkish but recently I discovered I have Turkish ancestry so my dads great great great grandfather was the great grandson of a Turkish chiftan or khan as they say and this guy was famous in Iran we searched him up so cool

[@anthonyderosa7730]

@@middleeasternforhire8985 that is really cool actually lol

[@middleeasternforhire8985]

@@anthonyderosa7730 I know right 🤣🤣

[@DeYiZhiMusilin]

Hi there! I suggested you watch the guy’s other video about DNA history of Italy, and then you will realise that there is no such thing as pure Italians in the first place. Modern Italians genetically, speaking are such a wild mixture of north, and south, east and west, in various proportions: the concept of pure Italian is just not existing.

[@anthonyderosa7730]

@@DeYiZhiMusilin I see! It's almost like one of the "migration centers" of the world that developed its own strange mixed language and everyone is either African Asian or European lol

[@GM9841]

Hi, the link to the DNA assessment -above- is not valid, are you still offering it? If you do, what would be the cost? Thank you

[@AncestralBrew]

Hi I fixed the link

[@sassimaus2]

Wow this was so interesting! Thank you for that!

[@siyah3113]

When I look at the faces of Turks, I see very wide cheekbones and a straight head. a purely asian trait. But there is no such thing in Greeks, Armenians, Persians. I think we are a mixture of Anatolian and Turks.

[@mikem8211]

Yes 100% Anatolian Greeks 😂

[@melisay12]

​@@mikem8211Sen nesin!?

[@moosa9850]

The link to your website, doesn't exist is there another option

[@AncestralBrew]

I fixed it

[@moosa9850]

@@AncestralBrew Thanks a million

[@ntombimadu8437]

Yo! Your website isn’t working or your link isn’t working

[@AncestralBrew]

I fixed it

[@nzvr1]

0:27 This ancient Turks facial reconstruction is accurate, at least for their ruling class. recently, The first genetic analysis on the Empress Ashina in 2023 by Xiaoming Yang et al. found nearly exclusively Northeast Asian ancestry (97,7%) next to minor West-Eurasian components (2,7%). The ancient Türkic royal family of the Göktürk Khaganate was found to share genetic affinities to post-Iron Age Tungusic and Mongolic pastoralists, while having heterogeneous relationships towards various Turkic-speaking groups, suggesting genetic heterogeneity and multiple sources of origin for the population of the Turkic Khaganate. According to the authors, these findings "once again validates a cultural diffusion model over a demic diffusion model for the spread of Turkic languages" and refutes "the western Eurasian origin and multiple origin hypotheses" in favor of an East Asian origin for the Türks.[4]

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Many Mongolian tribes are originally of Turkic origin, thus western Mongolics have around 35-40% Turkic blood. However, I don't know how much Turkic blood the Tungusic peoples have.

[@sushanth1689]

​@@papazataklaattiranimam none of Mongolian were turkish abdools

[@ftk4886]

​@Qazaq_Qijatno way man, anatolian Turks are not greek. There are some but definitely not all of them.

[@Alprtngakrc]

Empress Ashina doesn't have Y-DNA as she is female. In females you cannot say anything about the genetic heritage without getting the samples of male relatives of her paternal side just by looking their autosomal genes. This DNA results don't match any of the DNA samples with the rest of Kok Turk samples. Besides Mukhan Kagan who was the father of Empress Ashina is always mentioned as red haired lapice blue eyes. Obviously either Empress Ashina was just an adopted daughter of Mukhan Kagan or simply the reading of her autosomal genes is inaccurate.

[@meraj.M]

@Qazaq_Qijat 👍👍👍

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

There are still around 20 million Turanid looking people in Turkiye due to their Turkic ancestry.

[@Dzlyesful]

Can you make an analysis of north african population

[@FrithonaHrududu02127]

The cat in the thumbnail is like the most Turkish guy ive ever seen

[@user-vd7mm4fx6y]

O’zbek turkiy qardoshlardan hammaga salomlar🇺🇿

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Starostin, George (2016). "Altaic Languages". Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Despite the validity of many of these objections, it remains unclear whether they are sufficient to completely discredit the hypothesis of a genetic connection between the various branches of “Altaic,” which continues to be actively supported by a small, but stable scholarly minority.

[@tengriaslan2423]

Do you remember Hz Muhammed grandson of Husayn ibn Ali? Don't you think this is forgetting just starting what Timur did Yezid grave compare what I will do nothing. Everyone own free will, crushed all the Türk enemies thanks for remind us kuteybe bin muslim genocide of Turks such as Khorosan, Curcan and Talkan.

[@tengriaslan2423]

Let me clear this out also Türkçe yazicam bunu cemaat ve Tarikatlarin en büyüğü masonlar asılacak ve silinecek diğer cemaat ve tarikatlarda bunun içinde Mehdi çok büyük temizlik yapicak gelen deli bir kişi hepinizi kesicek zalimlerin.

[@tengriaslan2423]

Türkçe yazıcam bunu cemaat ve tarikatlarin en büyüğü masonlar asılacak ve silinecek diğer cemaat ve tarikatlarda bunun içinde Mehdi çok büyük temizlik yapicak gelen deli bir kişi hepinizi kesicek zalimlerin artık siz düşünün nereye kacicaksiniz sizin acı cigliklarinizi göğün 8 katında inletecek bütün evren duyucak Mehdi emin olcak herkes duydu.

[@tengriaslan2423]

Thomas Edward Lawrence CB DSO (16 August 1888 - 19 May 1935) was a British archaeologist, army officer, diplomat, and writer who became renowned for his role in the Arab Revolt (1916-1918) and the Sinai and Palestine Campaign (1915-1918) against the Ottoman Empire during the First World War.

[@cynthia121266]

So they are originally from Crimea??? 👌

[@SmokeySkies]

all i know my mum was tatar and my dads family was from rize but they divorced 2 years later after i was born in Australia. my aunties use to tell me i looked asian when i was younger but not so much now.

[@yja496]

😊Many different Turkic people, cool video

[@Ersen_abiniz]

i am a Real Anatolian Turkish and have Q1b1 yDNA, native american gernes, beringian genes, polynesian genes, austrilian aborgin genes, inuit genes, %2.6 japan and korean too. But mostly caucasus hunter gatherers, european hunter gatherers, and native Anatolian farmer genes.

[@imnottalkingtoanatolianzombies]

@@grrrbrrr9053 Native americans are either turkic or was neighbour with turkic people. DNA examples and culture traditions dresses explain these.

[@natianatia351]

Which website did you use for DNA? I would like to test my DNA

[@whitepouch0904]

@@imnottalkingtoanatolianzombies they’re not Turkic but related. Basically East Asian/Siberian.

[@whitepouch0904]

Native Americans came from East Asian/Siberian regions so it’s not surprising he has that genes

[@fermanrekica4766]

@@whitepouch0904 Native Americans have hook noses and robust headshapes with only few Asian features. East Asian/Siberian are flat face people, how can they be the same? Maybe the Inuits, Eskimo are.

[@luckyluciano1623]

Mate, you look very Romanian. You look like my cousin LOL definitely a lot of mixing. People from the Middle East all think I am part of their people and they are surprised when I tell them I am Romanian. A pleasant surprise on their part, for some reason people just find Romanians very likable. I choose my words and my actions very carefully, only because there are so few Romanians around the world that I consider myself a kind of Ambassador for Romanians. I'm good at everything I do only because I don't want to let down my ancestors so I always strive to be the best

[@albintorso6107]

He's Iranian

[@AFBLYS]

My maternal grandmother is Romanian, my maternal grandfather is Crimean Tatar, my father is a Syrian Arab…

[@davidmccarroll2280]

There's very middle eastern looking Europeans and very European looking middle easterners. It isn't so much because of mixing but rather both regions aren't so racially (phenotypically) distinct from one another. Your average Roman and Dacian ancestor may not look like scandanavians key word being on average, and may pass for an Iranian and whatnot

[@none2912]

Ethnic Romanians are slavic in DNA and if you look Middle Eastern, chances are you've mixed with Romani or Turkish

[@Rchigo]

​@@none2912Ethnic romanians never been slavic

[@niconicoo5661]

Can you do about kartvelian people

[@umitkaytan8985]

Türklerden bahs etmişsiniz ama Türkçe altyazı koymamışsınız

[@melisay12]

Evet bide yalan söylüyor

[@JohnSmith-en6ev]

Turks aren't very turkic

[@melisay12]

@@JohnSmith-en6ev Are you joke? You are idoit.

[@hakancelik7978]

The thing is sure that in "Turkey" the real Turcs are in minority... They are not more then 6-7 % genetically ...This percentage rise up only 20 % culturally with Iranic people(Scythes ,Sogdians,Bactrians,Harezmians) that they assimilated in Central Asia and emigrated all together to " Turkey" ...This respectfully people ,so the real Turcs are called Turcomans(Turkmen,Yörük,Tahtaci,çepni) actually.... Who are the others 80 % ? They are the people who is converted to Islam and assimilated ti Turkish language and refuged people from Balkan(Bulgar/Pomak,Macedonians,Albanians,Bosnians...) and Caucasians people(Adigey,Chechen,Osetians,Abkhasians)... and dont forgetting the native Anatolians...

[@ISHITA_PRATEEK]

That is actually true ...80 % of turkish population is not turk

[@EzKurdim1]

The Iranic dna is from the Kurds because Kurds are Iranic

[@imnottalkingtoanatolianzombies]

why do you add iranic people? Turkic and iranic completely different. one is central asian other one is middle eastern lol. ignorant fake turk

[@hakancelik7978]

@@imnottalkingtoanatolianzombies The Turco-mongoles tribes has assimilated in Central Asia the Iranic people who is the Sogdians,Bactrians and Harezmians people... You are ignorant...I ma not fake...I am not Turc...Quite simply

[@atkatk9355]

No, the average medieval Turkic genetic inheritance in Anatolian Turks is between 25% and 45% Half of the genetics of Middle African Turkic communities come from eastern Iranic societies

[@serkankinden5150]

Hi youtuber friend! Thanks a lot, I have seen your study about Turkey with our turkic euroasian, central asian and northeast asian ancestry. But again you told like western euroasians are unrelated with turkic people. I will repeat my idea: Saka/Scythian people of euroasia are related to turkic east euroasian, northeast and central asian people. They have been assimilated to indoarian language by persians and caucasian arians during their journey tousands years ago. (Starting from 30k BC to 10k BC with same special stone forming culture) I. Darius (old persian king) claims himself as "persian of persians, arian of arians" and mentioned about Saka people as foreign people by their central asian origins. Saka means nomad in old persian like some turkic people call themselves as Yürük meaning nomad even today. Persians (mostly J2 M172) fighted against Saka people of central asia (as written in wiki) and won against turkic central asians and assimilated them by power. Asian hunnic empire and their ancestors are from northeast asia and spread to west and south, some has passed over persia, mesopotamia, anatolia, balkans to euroasia and west europe. Some have become Saka by persian language. Some have changed to european languages. This is why turkic, ugric, hunnic (also you showed a picture of ak-khion = white hun like north indian huns at 0:28) and the other altaic, uralic, native american people have similar genetics. Their N, O, P, Q, R, R1, R1a, R1b, R2 haplogroups are very different from indoeuropeans: F, G, H, I1, I2, J2, L haplogroups... Altaic, uralic genetics even spread to west and north europe in tousands years. I do not mean all are turkic, but history and science should inspect, understand that they are related to altaic, uralic people.

[@user-kc6eu2fz6q]

The Scythians are people of Aryan and Iranian descent, not Turks

[@serkankinden5150]

@@user-kc6eu2fz6q As linguistically yes, but genetically all R1, R1a, R1b, R2 are descendants of P haplogroup of C3, N, O3, P ancient northern east asians ANEA. ANEA are descendants of southeast asian K2, C2 and all were speaking a group of uralic-altaic + dene-caucasian language. ANEA were speaking uralic-altaic languages as referenced from Martine Robeets. Even R haplogroup is uyghur turkic today and Yakut (Sakut) and Soyot turkic people are speaking still turkic. Soyot, Altai, Tuva people are modern P haplogroup people. Sumerians were named Sagh-gir/Saka by old persians, but they called themselves as Kenghir meaning Huns (Khan-s in english and Khiang-nu in chinese). Sumerian is one of dene-caucasian language family as agglutinative.

[@marmary5555]

​@@serkankinden5150Iranians are not mostly J2 and M, but R1a and J2 and G. Stop spreading your racist Iranophobic trash theories in here.

[@marmary5555]

​@@user-kc6eu2fz6qPanturks don't understand logic. He is a typical panturd spreading BS

[@rocksody1]

@@user-kc6eu2fz6q Iranians do not drink kumiss, do not bury their dead in kurgans, do not know tamga. There is no concrete historical source that the Scythians were Iranian. You can read the writings of Plinius Secundus and do historical research.

[@user-rq5xe2dl1m]

Good job

[@vladodobleja748]

As a Romanian from Southern Romania (Wallachia) do I have any genetic similarity with the Turkish people today considering the fact the the Romanian Principalities were never under the Ottoman Empire?

[@SvetlanaDurana69]

You might have Turkish ancestry, have you done a DNA test before? I would be happy to help you

[@wolfsblutgraumond7530]

i am also weeired kind of turk. my parents are from kars but my grand grand father fleed from the north somewhere to Turkey when the russians invated. i am not sure from wich part of causcassus. i think my people are called terekeme or karapapak aswell. so there might be a azeri relation but i dont know. i would like to know more about the history of that dna

[@ErdalBaggal-dt6fb]

​@muslimsagainstdegeneration9544 Turks are majority of Kars population around 60%-%70

[@tengriaslan2423]

it has made it a profession to refute the Turkish Official History based on the historical view adopted by Atatürk; There are a number of writers who defend the Giladstonist, Renanist, Hitlerist, Sevrid Indo-Aryan European Official History, which stigmatizes Turks as enemies of civilization. Such writers who call themselves "historians" and make them call themselves "historians"; The theses they attacked by saying "Turkish Official History Thesis" were not actually produced by Atatürk in the 1930s; Between 1800-1876, that is, before Atatürk was born, Fergusson, Rawlinson, Layard, Oppert, Cahun, etc. They either do not know at all, or even hide this fact, that hundreds of such Western knowledge is based on their scientific determinations. Ataturk never interpreted this historical thesis as "Political Expansionism" (Panturanism) and did not apply it as such. With this scientific thesis, Atatürk proved that the Turks, whom the West regarded as barbarians, have a deep-rooted and civilized past within the human family; The West is unscientific. Atatürk responded to "political racist" insults with this scientific thesis, also produced by Western.

[@Seranoss]

@@Unknown00432 NO

[@Carloeziomauro]

First Turkish were from Siberian Taiga, not Altai

[@bahjo7279]

I'm Khasi and interested in detail DNA of the Khasi people in Meghalaya, India.

[@cengizhanates1770]

My haplogrup is N-M231 Wha is that meaning

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

That means your forefathers came from Eastern Siberia

[@cengizhanates1770]

@@papazataklaattiranimam that means my ancestors Turkish

[@GreatTurkicKhagnate]

​@@cengizhanates1770Turkic

[@danialrezaie9794]

Hi sir I’m from Afghanistan and my ethnicity is called Hazara. Can you please do a deep research and analysis on Hazara ethnicity, DNA, origin where we came from, and a little bit of our history.

[@morgomi]

My ancestors were nomadic, they rode their horses across vast lands. so that means they married very different cultures:, I mean Russian, Ukranian, Bulgarian, Rum, Armenian, Kurdish, Iranian, Jewish, etc etc. How can I describe this: maybe "steppe tolerance"? And here we are... My gf is Russian, I speak Turkish my "culture" is Turkish. And I don't give a flying fuck about my "origin" XD

[@Life_is_a_scam]

Link does not work

[@AncestralBrew]

Hi I fixed it

[@epsilonxvi5675]

the cuman and kipchak really made hungaryy so safe 🤣😂

[@AFBLYS]

My maternal grandmother is Romanian, my maternal grandfather is Crimean Tatar, my father is a Syrian Arab…

[@ineedhelpsoundproofing]

If you wanna go further back, they were from a small region in Manchuria. That's where the ancestors of Proto Turks/Mongolic/Tungusic and Japonic people are allegedly from

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

What a fringe theory though

[@ineedhelpsoundproofing]

@@papazataklaattiranimam it's not all that plausible. Martine Robbeets published a paper on this.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

@@ineedhelpsoundproofing is still supporting by minority of expert scholars

[@ineedhelpsoundproofing]

@@papazataklaattiranimam you're one of those anti-altaic theorist

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

@@ineedhelpsoundproofing yeppp

[@CS-zn6pp]

DNA assessments link is dead.

[@AncestralBrew]

I fixed it

[@amanberak7848]

Check about Eritrean Tigrinya people

[@turkcukayi]

I am from Paphlagonia region in the Western Black Sea Region. Civilizations such as Palaic, Bithynians, Paphlagons, Hittites, Lydians and Phrygians ruled here. Later, the Turks came and added sauce to this soup. Therefore, as Turks researching our past, we know that we are the descendants of a mixture of all these peoples.

[@onur6557]

Im also Paphlagonian (from Amasra / Cakraz village) but im half Abkhazian and half Turkish

[@turkcukayi]

@@onur6557 Abkhazians are not Paphlagonians. Your Abkhazian roots probably come from those who took refuge in the Ottoman Empire after the Russian invasion of the Caucasus.

[@onur6557]

​@@turkcukayi Yes I am aware of that I expressed myself wrong I am half-Paphlagonian :) My Abkhazian ancestors came from Gagra in 1878 first to Karadeniz Eregli and then to Amasra.

[@turkcukayi]

@@onur6557 I did not know that there was an Abkhazian migration to the Western Black Sea. I thought more Circassians were coming. The genocidal Russians exiled all the peoples of the Caucasus to Anatolia.

[@ANSWERING_TO_CLOWNS]

The clossest related group to Phyrgians ans Lydians are anatolian Greeks, same goes for Hitties but Turks are also close related to Hitties.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Reupload😮

[@AncestralBrew]

Yeah I had to take several of my videos down so I’ll be repuploading them

[@ShizoNutritionist]

@@AncestralBrew will the Amazigh Video gu up again? It was really good, would like to watch it again 😬

[@user-gj1uu1dr9z]

Who cares what you are just be human love is all we need. The world is my country and the people in it are all my brothers and sisters. And all living beings including all nature we are all one . Peace ✌️. By the way I am Turk .😊❤

[@korayozbay9762]

Great summary. Thanks

[@tolgaerdinc7191]

I am half Turkish and half African American and it’s half to see someone spreading our history

[@AdultThirdCultureKid1971]

That's fascinating to know that because I remember watching a video about Africans who were born in Turkiye, before the Ottoman Empire fell. 🤔

[@DorchadasAgusSolas]

Dude.. African American !? that's so cool ...

[@AFBLYS]

My maternal grandmother is Romanian, my maternal grandfather is Crimean Tatar, my father is a Syrian Arab…

[@davidfl.220]

My grand grandfather is Turkish and im from Brazil, so this makes me half Turkish and half Brazilian ?

[@AFBLYS]

@@davidfl.220 this is a matter if you feel so or not. If u feel it, no matter what they say…

[@dogukan066]

3:39 This Example is Half Turk Half Sogdian, Also The Turkmens Are Mixture Of Oghuz And Persian People And Not Pure Oghuz. Ancient Oghuzs Are Most Similar to Modern Karakalpaks, Nogais, Bashkirs and Siberian Tatars. The Turks who settled in Anatolia for the first time are closer to the Nogai and Karakalpaks than the Turkmen and they have around %50 East Asian genetics. The Turkmens Are %25 East Asian.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Maybe because Turkic warriors took eastern iranic women before migrated Iran

[@ghosternz6109]

That is so wrong. Turkmens are not mixed with persians, not even today. And turkmens are not as little as 25% east asian, they are more east asian than the turkish and azeries

[@dogukan066]

@@ghosternz6109 Target: Turkmen Distance: 4.7275% / 0.04727528 72.6 Caucasoid 27.4 Mongoloid

[@dogukan066]

@@ghosternz6109 Target: Turkmen Distance: 1.7307% / 0.01730678 57.6 TUR_Ottoman:MA2195 42.4 Iranian_Fars

[@dogukan066]

@@ghosternz6109 + Target: KAZ_Turk:DA89 Distance: 2.3540% / 0.02354046 55.8 KAZ_Otyrar_Antiquity 44.2 MNG_Early_Med_Turk Otyrar Antiquity=Sogdian Early_Med_Turk=Early Gokturks From Mongolia

[@sanramondublin]

Ali, please tell us about yourself and your researches or academic. Of course research doesn't have to be the same as your major in University. Thank you and I like your clips. .. California.

[@tengriaslan2423]

Research by anthropologists has revealed that the genetic cradle of the first inhabitants of the North American continent was the mountainous Altai region in southern Siberia. Theodore Schurr, Associate Professor of Anthropology at the University of Pennsylvania, who conducted the research published in the Journal of Human Genetics in the USA, stated that the Altai region, where Russia, Mongolia, China and Kazakhstan intersect, is a key place where many peoples have come and gone for tens of thousands of years. According to the research, the first humans in the Americas their ancestors were one of these peoples and came from Altai, which is now part of the Russian Federation, between 20,000 and 25,000 years ago. These people with Asian genetic traits crossed all of Siberia and entered North America by crossing the Bering Strait, which was not flooded at that time. ERGENEKON THERE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 🇺🇸 Let me immediately point out that the Altai region, which scientists describe today; It is one of the most important areas of Turkish history. Because this is the homeland of the Turks. After the collapse of the Hyung-Nu (Hun) Turkish empire, the blacksmith Achina (Asena) tribe emerged in this region at the beginning of the 5th century. These Turks, who call themselves Ashina, which means "Noble Wolf", established the state known as the Göktürk Empire in history. These; In order to protect themselves from the enemies, they initially chose this steep area where the mighty mountain range intersects as their homeland. They called the point they were in Ergenekon, which means "Steep Slope". This information, the world-famous Soviet historian Prof. It is included in L. N. Gumilev's book called Ancient Turks. We also showed the connection between these Turks and blacksmith Turkmen in our work titled Turkish Identity. This blacksmith Achines; They held the technological superiority of Asia (iron technology) and made very valuable war tools. The geography described by the US Anthropologist Schurr is the place known as Ergenekon in our history.

[@tengriaslan2423]

Research by anthropologists has revealed that the genetic cradle of the first inhabitants of the North American continent was the mountainous Altai region in southern Siberia. Theodore Schurr, Associate Professor of Anthropology at the University of Pennsylvania, who conducted the research published in the Journal of Human Genetics in the USA, stated that the Altai region, where Russia, Mongolia, China and Kazakhstan intersect, is a key place where many peoples have come and gone for tens of thousands of years. According to the research, the first humans in the Americas their ancestors were one of these peoples and came from Altai, which is now part of the Russian Federation, between 20,000 and 25,000 years ago. These people with Asian genetic traits crossed all of Siberia and entered North America by crossing the Bering Strait, which was not flooded at that time. Let me immediately point out that the Altai region, which scientists describe today; It is one of the most important areas of Turkish history. Because this is the homeland of the Turks. After the collapse of the Hyung-Nu (Hun) Turkish empire, the blacksmith Achina (Asena) tribe emerged in this region at the beginning of the 5th century. These Turks, who call themselves Ashina, which means "Noble Wolf", established the state known as the Göktürk Empire in history. These; In order to protect themselves from the enemies, they initially chose this steep area where the mighty mountain range intersects as their homeland. They called the point they were in Ergenekon, which means "Steep Slope". This information, the world-famous Soviet historian Prof. It is included in L. N. Gumilev's book called Ancient Turks. We also showed the connection between these Turks and blacksmith Turkmen in our work titled Turkish Identity. This blacksmith Achines; They held the technological superiority of Asia (iron technology) and made very valuable war tools. The geography described by the US Anthropologist Schurr is the place known as Ergenekon in our history.

[@tengriaslan2423]

Research by anthropologists has revealed that the genetic cradle of the first inhabitants of the North American continent was the mountainous Altai region in southern Siberia. Theodore Schurr, Associate Professor of Anthropology at the University of Pennsylvania, who conducted the research published in the Journal of Human Genetics in the USA, stated that the Altai region, where Russia, Mongolia, China and Kazakhstan intersect, is a key place where many peoples have come and gone for tens of thousands of years. According to the research, the first humans in the Americas their ancestors were one of these peoples and came from Altai, which is now part of the Russian Federation, between 20,000 and 25,000 years ago. These people with Asian genetic traits crossed all of Siberia and entered North America by crossing the Bering Strait, which was not flooded at that time. Let me immediately point out that the Altai region, which scientists describe today; It is one of the most important areas of Turkish history. Because this is the homeland of the Turks. After the collapse of the Hyung-Nu (Hun) Turkish empire, the blacksmith Achina (Asena) tribe emerged in this region at the beginning of the 5th century. These Turks, who call themselves Ashina, which means "Noble Wolf", established the state known as the Göktürk Empire in history.

[@tengriaslan2423]

Research by anthropologists has revealed that the genetic cradle of the first inhabitants of the North American continent was the mountainous Altai region in southern Siberia. Theodore Schurr, Associate Professor of Anthropology at the University of Pennsylvania, who conducted the research published in the Journal of Human Genetics in the USA, stated that the Altai region, where Russia, Mongolia, China and Kazakhstan intersect, is a key place where many peoples have come and gone for tens of thousands of years. According to the research, the first humans in the Americas their ancestors were one of these peoples and came from Altai, which is now part of the Russian Federation, between 20,000 and 25,000 years ago. These people with asian genetic traits crossed all of Siberia and entered north america by crossing the Bering Strait, which was not flooded at that time.

[@tengriaslan2423]

Let me immediately point out that the Altai region, which scientists describe today; It is one of the most important areas of Turkish history. Because this is the homeland of the Turks. After the collapse of the Hyung-Nu (Hun) Turkish empire, the blacksmith Achina (Asena) tribe emerged in this region at the beginning of the 5th century. These Turks, who call themselves Ashina, which means "Noble Wolf", established the state known as the Göktürk Empire in history. These; In order to protect themselves from the enemies, they initially chose this steep area where the mighty mountain range intersects as their homeland. They called the point they were in Ergenekon, which means "Steep Slope". This information, the world-famous Soviet historian Prof. It is included in L. N. Gumilev's book called Ancient Turks. We also showed the connection between these Turks and blacksmith Turkmen in our work titled Turkish Identity. This blacksmith Achines; They held the technological superiority of Asia (iron technology) and made very valuable war tools. The geography described by the US Anthropologist Schurr is the place known as Ergenekon in our history.

[@ahm2213]

How about the Turkish Cypriots? It would be great if you could make a video on that if you haven’t already

[@lou6749]

What about the Turkish in Cyprus ??

[@arisandreopoulos9247]

The turkish cypriots have greek dna meaning that they are ancestors of greeks that coverted to islam in order to avoid persecution and thus were turkified

[@lou6749]

@@arisandreopoulos9247 I'm not even Cypriot or Greek and I agree with SIR 👍👍✌️✌️

[@cihanozel4344]

@@arisandreopoulos9247 no they have pure turkish blood. Their ancestors send from anatolia because they were aganst it otoman dynasty

[@arisandreopoulos9247]

@@cihanozel4344 even the Turks of Anatolia are in the most part descendants of christians that turned to islam. That is why the Turks that colonized Anatolia in the 13th century have DNA from Turkmenistan and not of modern day turkey

[@muhammadshehreyarkhan1851]

This clearly means that nationalism is often wrongly correlated ethnicity when it has more to do with culture assimilation. This true for Turkiye as well as historical Turkic states such as Golden Horde & Chaghtai Khanate whose rulers were ethnic Mongols but assimilated in the culture and religion of their Bulgar, Tatar and Cuman-Kipchak population. Same goes for Ikhanate who adopted the culture of their Iranian and Persian populace. Kazakhs have threee jhuzz; Senior, Middle and Junior comprising of both Turkic and Mongolic ancestry.

[@JayzsMr]

Ethnicity does not mean genes but cultural identity which is formed within a group . They can be more similar genetically or less , this is not what matters. What matters is cultural identity Which forms ethnic groups

[@randomguy-kn1wl]

persians or turkic people never before in history did identify themselves through ethnicity rather through culture and environment. Idk why so many people are obsessed with something which never played an role before for these people

[@johnxina5126]

@@randomguy-kn1wl exactly. I am sick of Iranians and Turks. They act as if Turkic and Iranic are not twrms used for language families and instead think all Turkic or Iranic people have same genetics

[@jeffmorrison2915]

Precisely.

[@jeffmorrison2915]

@@JayzsMrIt’s only the Turkic language and nothing more in common: Neither culture nor genetic background nor common ancestry is in common between a citizen of Turkey and, say, Kazakhstan. It is confused with ethnicity or even race.

[@canturan4396]

Hi, I'm from Trabzon (Trabizond) and my DNA result was all around the world , Rome, Balcan, West and Central Asia, East Asia and Korea-Japan, Mena(middle east and north Africa even Nigeria) so can l have the legitimaticy to form both Turan and Rome , :)

[@Paxia]

Mr worldwide ;)

[@Ersen_abiniz]

İf you have central asian and japanese and korean you must be a member of Çepni clan of Oğuz's. İn Trabzon province Turkish DNA is nearly 0 except ağsar

[@frankensteinalpha7]

Make a genetic study video of bodo kachari people of Assam, India @Ancestralbrew

[@attilatasciko4817]

2:15= again , you did not say , what "aus-t" türk mean . Etc...

[@fugenturkoglu]

Thank you for making this video. I enjoyed watching it. You've comparing the futures of Turkic and Chinese. I think Turkic people had Euroasian features before moving to West. Sometime I meet Turkic people from China's North West. Almost all of them look Euroasian some of them even having blue eyes. Difference between Turkic people and other groups of Chinese are very obvious. My Chinese friend told me once that I look just like European not EuroAsian because I'm an inbreed. 😂😂 Chinese have an interesting way of talking 🤗 I haven't researched much about Turks history since learning at primary school. In primary, I had learnt because of the weather conditions in Siberia, Altai mountains, there weren't much food except yogurt, kefir..., meat that type of food, they had decided moving toward warmer climate. It was decided one section of Turkic people move toward West (and those are today's Hungarian) and the other section toward South West (today's Turkiye) Of course, the movement involved many wars. However, I have read what you've mentioned on the video also in my educational research.

[@jonam7589]

Turks got mixed with Scythians and Saka which are the Iranian tribes many with red hair and blue eyes before moving west. Iranians were neighbor with china as they are today in Badakhshan Tajikestan.

[@fugenturkoglu]

@@jonam7589 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Niece try without any evidence and science.

[@tengriaslan2423]

Iit has made it a profession to refute the Turkish Official History based on the historical view adopted by Atatürk; There are a number of writers who defend the Giladstonist, Renanist, Hitlerist, Sevrid Indo-Aryan European Official History, which stigmatizes Turks as enemies of civilization. Such writers who call themselves "historians" and make them call themselves "historians"; The theses they attacked by saying "Turkish Official History Thesis" were not actually produced by Atatürk in the 1930s; Between 1800-1876, that is, before Atatürk was born, Fergusson, Rawlinson, Layard, Oppert, Cahun, etc. They either do not know at all, or even hide this fact, that hundreds of such Western knowledge is based on their scientific determinations. Ataturk never interpreted this historical thesis as "Political Expansionism" (Panturanism) and did not apply it as such. With this scientific thesis, Atatürk proved that the Turks, whom the West regarded as barbarians, have a deep-rooted and civilized past within the human family; The West is unscientific. Atatürk responded to "political racist" insults with this scientific thesis, also produced by Western.

[@fugenturkoglu]

​@@tengriaslan2423 Barbarians were Germanic, hence West. Is it any different after Barbarians. No. Look at what they did in Africa or Americans. Also, take a history or a science book written for central European schools. You'd think, Western Europe has created the world and the modern science such as maths, chemistry, physics...When Persians and Arabs were creating childrens' stories, novels and also using plants, extracting to make medicine and chemicals as medication, western Europe were killing poor drinking their blood as medicine.

[@tengriaslan2423]

@fugenturkoglu By Immigrant Europeans Applied to the Native American Turks Genocide types Ethnic massacre and Ethnic Cleansing: It was deliberately practiced by slaughtering the Native Americans. Relocation of Native Americans: It was carried out in the form of taking the Native Americans from their geography to another geography. Native American Reservation-Native American Reserve: It was implemented as the closure of Native Americans to certain places. Smallpox: It was deliberately and intentionally applied by infecting the Native Americans with old world diseases. Activities of Christian Missionaries: They were forcibly taken from their families and trained by Christian missionaries in boarding schools in Canada and the USA. The purpose of this education is to make Native American children forget their mother tonque and culture and assimilate them. Forced Sterilization: It was applied to reduce the number of Native Americans and prevent their reproduction. Colonialism: It was implemented by exploiting the underground and surface resources of the continent where the Native Americans lived. It continues to be applied especially to Brazilian and Argentine Native Americans. Mourning Day in the Native American, Feast Day in the USA The start date of the genocide against the Native Americans, October 12, is a great day of mourning as viewed by the Native Americans. Because their quiet life changed as of October 12, 1492, and the winds blew in the place of their former lives. The USA, on the other hand, called this day Columbus Day.

[@Alprtngakrc]

Turks, as an ethnic group, exhibit a wide range of phenotypes, which can be attributed to their complex history and the vast geography in which they have settled. It is important to note that phenotype is not the same as DNA, as genes determine many biological traits in humans, while phenotype only encompasses a fraction of these traits. It is possible for individuals with similar phenotypes to be genetically distinct from one another, while individuals with very different phenotypes may be genetically similar. This highlights the complexity of the relationship between genetics and phenotype, and the importance of considering both when studying human populations. The study of genetic makeup in ancient populations is a complex and nuanced field, with several potential pitfalls. One significant challenge is the fact that DNA samples extracted from ancient burial sites often come from noble classes or royal families, while samples obtained from contemporary populations often come from common people. This can make it difficult to accurately compare the genetic makeup of ancient and contemporary populations. One example of this issue can be found in the comparison of medieval Turks (and possibly proto-Turks) with Iranic people. While the noble class of Turkish populations engaged in marriages with nobles from neighboring states and empires as a way of obtaining dowries and acquiring new lands, the noble class of Iranic people practiced incest marriages in order to protect their noble blood. This difference in cultural practices means that it would be misleading to compare the genetic makeup of medieval and proto-Turks with ancient Iranic people in order to determine which group had more West Eurasian genes. Even in the DNA of (proto) Turks belonging to the noble class, who were heavily mixed with Asiatic populations, there is a significantly higher rate of West Eurasian genes compared to East Eurasian populations. This suggests that these groups initially had West Eurasian roots. It is also important to note that the DNA samples extracted from these groups do not accurately represent the common populations, so it can be assumed that the common people in these countries had diverse populations with a tendency towards West Eurasian. The comparison of genetic makeup in ancient and contemporary populations can be a complex task, and care must be taken to consider the limitations and biases of the available DNA samples. It’s insignificant whether Turks were blond or not. Yet, the fact that the Chinese described Turks as having distinctively different physical characteristics from the Iranic people is significant. The Iranic people are typically described as having physical characteristics similar to Semitic people like the Assyrians or Indian people, while the Turks are described as having blond or light-colored hair and distinctive eye and nose features. This raises the question of who the Turks mixed with to have these distinctive physical characteristics in western and eastern Mongolia, where there are no other populations with West Eurasian genes except for the Turks. It is also worth considering how the Turks could have acquired such distinctive physical traits if they had East Asian origins. Contemporary Turks can be distinguished from both West Eurasian and East Eurasian people based on their genetic makeup. In comparison to West Eurasian people, Turks have a higher proportion of East Eurasian genes in their DNA, which is not typically found in the genetic makeup of West Eurasian people. On the other hand, Turks can be distinguished from East Eurasian people by the significantly higher proportion of West Eurasian genes in their DNA, suggesting that they have West Eurasian roots and have mixed with East Eurasian people at some point in their history. This is the main difference between Turks and both West Eurasian and East Eurasian people. It is important to note that genetically, neither West Eurasian genes nor East Eurasian genes determine ethnicities. Rather, they are indicators of migration patterns and ancestral roots. The gene pools of ethnicities naturally enlarge over time as a result of intermarriage and other forms of genetic exchange, and this continuous process is one of the reasons why genetics cannot be used to determine ethnicities with certainty. It is important to recognize that genetics can provide insight into the migration patterns and ancestral roots of certain groups of people, but it does not determine their ethnicity or cultural identity.

[@CS-by7sg]

Great feedback. Thank you so much👍👍👍

[@user-sf4ps3si7m]

It is possible for individuals with similar phenotypes to be genetically distinct from one another, while individuals with very different phenotypes may be genetically similar. This highlights the complexity of the relationship between genetics and phenotype, and the importance of considering both when studying human populations. THAT IS THE FACT! I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU! AND BIOLOGY AGREES WITH YOU.

[@xdd87]

Seljkus who came To Anatolia were like %35 Asian. Modern Turks are %7-%20 except eastern black sea.

[@xdd87]

Seljkus who came To Anatolia were like %35 Asian. Modern Turks are %7-%20 except eastern black sea.@@user-sf4ps3si7m

[@xdd87]

Seljkus who came To Anatolia were like %35 Asian. Modern Turks are %7-%20 except eastern black sea.@@CS-by7sg

[@nurikucuk683]

We Want a video about kurds too.

[@ptichka1371]

I heard that Turkic DNA is also a bit similar to some ancient tribes inhabiting modern-day Finland??

[@subutaynoyan5372]

Turks were everywhere, like seriously everywhere, in times of Atilla, these people were cantering around Rome. Yeah, not all Huns were Turkic but they had a lot of Turkic peoples too. And estimations are that Atilla was speaking a language most probably a form of Proto-Turkic.

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Western authors give additional details about mixed marriages and the children born into such unions. The Latin historians of the Crusades noted in Anatolia a specific group of the Turkopouli (that is, 'the children of the Turks') who were born of a Greek mother and a Turkish father.53 For the beginning of the fourteenth century, the Catalan soldier and chronicler Ramon Muntaner reports that the Turks of western Anatolia married girls from noble Greek families. It is especially interesting that the male children of these mixed marriages 'became Turks and were circumcised', while for female children the choice of religion was free. The same difference between the religious affiliation of boys and girls was reported by Ludolf von Suchen in the middle of the fourteenth century. Von Suchen maintains that when the Turks married Christian women, the boys of the mixed marriages followed the Muslim religion of their fathers while the girls maintained the Christian faith of their mothers.54 However, as we have seen in Byzantine canonical texts, boys also could be baptised by their mothers. These reports confirm that, firstly, mixed marriages between Muslims and Greek women were common throughout the centuries, and, secondly, that the children of both Muslim and mixed marriages were baptised according to Orthodox Greek rites. The popularity of mixed marriages in Muslim lands has been very clearly demonstrated by a passage from the Byzantine historian of the fifteenth century, Doukas, who, with considerable arrogance, made the following observance about the Ottoman Turks: The people of this shameless and savage nation, moreover, do the following: if they seize a Greek woman or an Italian woman or a woman of another nation or a captive or a deserter, they embrace her as an Aphrodite or Semele, but a woman of their own nation or of their own tongue they loathe as though she were a bear or a hyena. 55 The predominance of Greek women at the Seljuk harem thus seems to have been merely a royal variation of a common practice in Muslim Anatolia. Greek women were valued as the most prestigious marriage partners among all strata of Muslim society. It was Greek women who guided their Muslim husbands and masters into the refined Byzantine way of life and the world of Byzantine luxury, introducing among other things new cuisines and ways of structuring the household. Although the information on Seljuk marriage policy in the eleventh to twelfth century is scarce, it seems highly probably that the Seljuk harem was modelled along similar lines as other strata of Muslim Anatolian society, with a preference of marriage to Greek women who in turn acted as mediators to the old world of the 'empire of the Romans'. Peacock, A. and Yildiz, S., 2012. The Seljuks of Anatolia.

[@Bozok3ok]

The surname Turci is an Italian name derived from the Latin word “turcus”, which means “Turkish”. Due to the prevalence of Italian diaspora, the variant spellings of Turci can be found all around the world. The Turcilingi (also spelled Torcilingi or Thorcilingi) were an obscure barbarian people, or possibly a clan or dynasty, who appear in historical sources relating to Middle Danubian peoples who were present in Italy during the reign of Romulus Augustulus (475-76).

[@imnottalkingtoanatolianzombies]

Im from aegean side of Turkey and i have aralid, first tier turanid phenotype which means most asian, turkic genes and which is common in Kazakhstan 🇰🇿 My father looks like Kurya Han, just without beard

[@Ataturk_48]

hocam yörükmüsünüz

[@monster91k]

Hahaha kendini kandır bakalım. Özellikle ege'nin ortalama dna'sı 80% yunan. Deden etek giyiyordu

[@imnottalkingtoanatolianzombies]

@@Ataturk_48 evet

[@turkcukayi]

@@imnottalkingtoanatolianzombies Normal. Çünkü o bölgedekiler Yörük ve yerleşik hayata geçeli fazla olmadı. Dolayısıyla oranın yerli halklarıyla daha az karıştılar. Türkler Anadolu'da en erken yerleşik hayata Marmara Batı Karadeniz ve Orta Anadolu'da geçtiler. Bu yüzden buradakiler Anadolu'nun yerli halklarıyla daha fazla karıştılar.

[@k1r4z.]

Based agean yörük turk

[@ecoxocticeternal816]

Interesting

[@mamnoona]

Why are we looking at your face rather than the genetic map?

[@ertugrulserdar5572]

All euro Asians have descendantcy all came from same place whether you are Europeans or Asians All from the steps and surrounding areas like Siberia northern China bordering up Koreans and Japanese peninsula it the south bordering Tibet

[@Paraglidecrete]

🇹🇷 Turks react to their MyHeritage DNA results 😱😮 note Yunanistanli ➡

[@based-iranian]

​@@melehtecolambal💀💀💀💀

[@xdd87]

Seljuks were %35-%40 Asian and were between Uzbeks and Turkmens autosomally. They didn't look like some Han Chinese. All Turkics are Eurasians. A mix of West and East Eurasian. Modern Turks have %7-%22 east Eurasian ancestry. Thus modern TURKS ARE %20-%45 Seljuk. If you don't know anyting about genetics it's not my fault. Also our non Turkic part is not a monolith either. Modern Anatolian Turks have only %35 ANF ancestry. Hittites had %60+. So no we are not same people with ancient Anatolians at all. A simple calculation of Turkish west Between Medieval samples in Vahaduo; Target: Turkish(West) Distance: 0.6720% / 0.00672047 31.2 KAZ_Kipchak 30.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC 16.4 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine 9.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC 8.0 IRN_Hasanlu_IA 5.0 Levant_Sidon_1800BC

[@Paraglidecrete]

21 percent minoan greek ,phonesian.12pc semitic.pc hittite, armenian.11pc caucasian, greco anatolian.11pc balkanic , near eastern.7.5 pc baltoslavic,mycenian greek, macedoniangreek.4 pc dinaric , danubian. 4 pc uralofinnic, baltic,siberian. pc arabic. 2 pc arabic. 2pc central asia. 2pc ethiopian egyptian . percent nordic

[@xdd87]

Lmao what I posted is directly from Vahaduo. You can hate as much as you want. Truth won't change. Target: Turkish(West) Distance: 0.6720% / 0.00672047 31.2 KAZ_Kipchak 30.2 Anatolia_Center_Phrygian_650BC 16.4 Paleo-Balkan+Slavic_MNE_Doclea_Bjelovine 9.2 Caucasus_BlackSea_Samsun_B_150BC 8.0 IRN_Hasanlu_IA 5.0 Levant_Sidon_1800BC@@Paraglidecrete

[@Paraglidecrete]

​@@xdd87 part of the lyrics in Greek say about keys to secret rooms that should be kept away so nobody sees them , any idea what is the meaning Recebim - Hey Gidi Hey (Horon) Cinan Müzik 639K subscribers 20,683,292 views

[@mackenzians5523]

1:03 I have heard a word Tokhairian so far Our tribal cast is As Tokhai resides inside Pakistan 🇵🇰 Afghanistan 🇦🇫 so far came across from Turkey as Tokhi Or Tokhai Our Ancestors Migrated from Turk but I just would like to unlock more further just because languages barriers I couldn’t be able to find much but I guess here I can understand and even as the Famous Poet Nazo Tokhi and Nasir shah The Prince of Iran many Tokhi tribal people went lived in iran also known as Mughal Emperors so all these scattered into different parts of Uzbekistan 🇺🇿 Tajikistan 🇹🇯 Turkmenistan 🇹🇲 As well

[@philo8040]

your link sends you to a non-existent page

[@AncestralBrew]

I fixed it

[@zehra0628]

I am Turkish and when I asked my origin or which Turk tribe we were from, my grandmother said Kayı tribe. I had just started watching Diriliş Ertuğrul and I was very happy to hear that I was descended from my grandfather Ertuğrul Gazi :D 🐺🇹🇷 Anyway, we entered Anatolia with the Battle of Manzikert. Years later, during the reign of Sultan Alaeddin, Söğüt became ours and we emigrated there. According to what my grandmother said, we were a family known as the Sarılar/Sarular or Saruhanlar back then. And this family of mine went to the Caucasus years later. But towards the end of the Ottoman Empire, due to the persecution of the Turks in the Caucasus, they migrated to the Black Sea region of Turkiye and lived there for a long time. That's why we have both a little Circassianism and Lazism. Of course, maybe I have mistakes, but in general, the historical story of my family was something like thiss. And btw There are many Turks with a similar story like me. This may be the reason why we got mixed. Because we constantly migrated.

[@A.Musa76]

This is why my DNA showed up Caucasus, Italy/Greece, ME, Africa North but I’m half Cypriot through my mother side. I don’t understand how Melanesian showed up as well.

[@American-drone]

What a wonderful story. About 9,000 years ago, you and my common ancestors, who grew millet around Liaohe in northeastern China and overcame the winter cold, would have imagined that you and I would be standing on opposite sides of the globe and meeting on KZbin.

[@AK-fe1lu]

However, a fundamental fact is left out in this confusion, which means that when listing many nations, we are ultimately only talking about one people, if the white man is included. For example. we are talking about the Huns, whose predecessors were the Scythians. The power of the Huns spread from ocean to ocean, plus they conquered 3/4 of North Africa and India, and of course their descendants remained everywhere. Another example, today's Ukraine and Russia were also inhabited by Scythians, Huns, the Roman slaveholder empire was liquidated.If you take off the clothes of today's nations, it turns out that they all have something in common, this is only possible if, for example, let's look at the Slavs, Scythians inhabited the land, the Mongol invasion came, they became slaves, hence their new name, but the people were not genetically modified.The Royal Szítas, who defeated the Mongols three times in 1242, 1285, 1342, were able to preserve their national intentions.There are countless proofs of this, e.g. China built a museum in honor of the Royal Scythians, the state of Bihar in India was also named after the Royal Scythians, because such a county still exists in their country, Etruscans also come from the Royal Scythians, Italian researchers prove.

[@noyan62]

Iyıde Osmanlı kayı degıl ki tımur yenılgısı sonrası Türkmenlerin destegını kaybedınce öyle bısey öne surmuslerdır 😅😅😅😅 halıl ınancık dınle ve sen kayı ol Zehra lakın bin yıldır Anadolu halkları ıle kaynaşıp kanı kaybettın Türklüğün tartışılır ve kayı dahı olsan kayının k sı kaldıysa dua et 😅😅😅😅😅😅

[@noyan62]

@@zehra0628 hahaha sadece kanı kaybetmıs ınsansın kayı degıl k sı kalmadı ;) Türk kanını kültürünü korumuş olandır Anadolu çoğu yerlı halkların devırmesı o yerlı halklar ıle bın yıldır kaynaşan da Türk degıldır kanı kaybetmıstır kayı ımıs :))))))))))) sen gerçek kayı ısen gerçekten Türk ısen ben Mete hanım :) kanen Türk sadece orta Asya’dır İran veya Anadolu karışım mıllettır bılgın olsun yerlıler çok dha fazlaydı bin yıldır kaynaşıyorsun sımdı yallah kültürün de Arab’ın dır

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Intermarriage between Turks and Greek, Armenian and Georgian natives of Anatolia was not unheard of, although the majority of these unions were between Turkish men and Christian women. The children of these unions, known as 'Mixovarvaroi', were raised as Turks and were of the Muslim faith (although there were some cases of Mixovarvaroi defecting to the Byzantines). It is likely that these unions played a role in the eventual diminishment of the Christian population in Anatolia and its transition from Greek/Christian to Turkish/Muslim. [24] Vryonis Jr, Speros (1971). The Decline of Medieval Hellenism in Asia Minor and the Process of Islamization from the Eleventh through the Fifteenth Century. California: Berkeley University Press. p. 176.

[@sushanth1689]

Well that's the speciality of chuslims

[@meditarrianean337]

Intermarriages happened in both ways as it can be seen that turkic ydna amongst turks is %30 which is even lower than autosomal turkic heritage

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

@@meditarrianean337 Most of Turkish Y-Dna is directly from Central Asia

[@meditarrianean337]

@@papazataklaattiranimam no,most of it is from anatolia

[@meditarrianean337]

This %30 includes R1a and some J2 subbranches,even with adding them it doesn't go up more than %32,which is lover than turkish autosomal central asian admixture

[@iccinternationalcricketc-ei6tl]

make video for a pashtun (afghan) on dna

[@tariqrahman6918]

So would one have to send you a sample? My mum is Lodi and my dad mogul - what am I? When the Seljuks took over anotolia the wanna be greek cappadokians and Georgians and Armenians (nobles) went off and created the different states in Europe

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Proto-Turks weren’t East Asians but mixed population of Ancient North Eurasians(Q-R ANE) and Ancient North Asians (ANA)

[@matrixxx3662]

He just exposed how little Turkic dna there is In Turkey 🦃🤡🤥

[@saanjanibaar8085]

Q is an East Asian Paternal lineage. R is also a East Eurasian decentdent but mixed heavily with european hunter gathers.

[@DorchadasAgusSolas]

That Greek on the thumbnail is killing me 😂🥲

[@davitdavitdavit]

Not much info. You'd better show the breakdown of most Turkish DNA for now

[@irfanaliyousufi3714]

Make a video on Hazaras please ❤❤❤

[@papazataklaattiranimam]

Nevertheless, Turkic peoples share, to varying degrees, non-linguistic characteristics like cultural traits, ancestry from a common gene pool, and historical experiences.[1]