Why Activism is a Moral Obligation? | Extinctionism

[@kodak-5677]

Not really there is a difference between directly causing suffering and just letting suffering happen and not interfering the first one is a obligation but the last one i am not so sure about

[@Iam-not-VEGAN-but-]

Yes, thanks for the walkthrough

[@Pro_extinction]

If you have walked through watch this next kzbin.info/www/bejne/o4Gqe3SnibpsrKcsi=sVWI9yD_ZCRKMSh1

[@SANDY-jb1lk]

Ok if we successful in extinctions of all organization in the earth there this any gurantee. Our conscious also extinct in this universe there are trillion of trillion planets they can contain life what if we born in anther planet than what if that planet as worse life than earth ??? Pls try to understand what I'm saying my english very bad

[@Pro_extinction]

Please watch our how extinction video and will life come back video of u have further questions you can reach out to our page in Instagram

[@EFIlist-Anti-NATALIST]

🎉

[@Pro_extinction]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/o4Gqe3SnibpsrKcsi=sVWI9yD_ZCRKMSh1

[@-wheel38]

😂 Brohhh ! The way you're approaching, preaching it's worsening... Reluctant. That's certainly not the way you promote.

[@Pro_extinction]

Where can I see your approaches towards the issue of eradicating suffering?

[@efilism]

You're wrong. I deal with this in "Why Does Antinatalism Exclude Animals?" 10m35s-15m08s "Can" doesn't imply "ought", which is what you're arguing. It's the same as Gary Mosher's Burden of Intelligence. There isn't any duty to intervene. You're generalizing your personal arbitrary preferences into universal duties for everyone else. To be clear, absence of a duty doesn't automatically mean it isn't better to help. But invoking a universal duty where no such duty exists is manipulative. It's the kind of approach used by religious evangelists to circumvent the intellect and guilt people into an emotional response. Don't make the mistake of turning personal revulsion into universal obligation. That might work with people who don't understand the rhetorical techniques you're employing. But it won't work with those of us who do.

[@Pro_extinction]

I already accept it's doesn't work with you. Why you have to come to every video comment and prove that you are a sadist pervert who likes to watch suffering?

[@efilism]

@@Pro_extinction Calling me names doesn't change the fact your arguments are easy to dismiss. If you're trying to circumvent the intellect that means your target audience is people moved by emotional rhetoric rather than rigorous argumentation. The weak leading the weak.

[@mytransfriendbobbie7308]

​@@efilismHave you never heard of the master persuasive technique of "ad hominem attacks"? Lol. This guy is obviously all about hearts and minds with calling people sadistic perverted morons. He is a parody of a serious person.

[@mytransfriendbobbie7308]

@efilism Have you never heard of the master persuasive technique of "ad hominem attacks"? Lol. This guy is obviously all about hearts and minds with calling people sadistic perverted morons. He is a parody of a serious person.

[@abhishekm6703]

I do think Anti-natalists can procreate in practice and still be called as Anti-natalists as there is no such thing as an ethical or universal duty or obligation to refrain from procreation in practice while holding that in theory. Just because some anti-natalist 'can' doesn't mean they 'ought to' refrain from procreation in practice.

[@NiaEsto]

Classic capitalist must have said that.