STOP Believing the 9/11 Lies You've Been Told

[@yajujmajuj1739]

I keep saying this; no living soul today met any disciple or sahaba, or d founder of those religions, all we have are their books, sunnah and teachings, so if I'm to choose a faith based on d founder, their sunnah and disciples/sahabas,izlm wouldn't even be an option

[@watchman4todayreloaded192]

They never even invented Muhammad's saying and bio till 200 years after he is supposed to have died, and the coins prove that what they wrote is baloney. The Muhammad is supposed to have banned crosses and other images during his life time, and yet we find coins from Mu'awiyah and Abd Al Malik with their images and crosses on them. So either they were not really Muslims decades after they were supposed to be, or someone invented all the stories about banning images and crosses decades after Muhammad is supposed to have died.

[@jackray1337]

Please check your microphone gain levels. Your sound is high and cracking/scratchy sounding. One example is 19:19 to about 19:25. Listen to how "tax collector" spikes and crackles.

[@YourBrotherInChrist]

I fixed it for the future

[@watchman4todayreloaded192]

Why 9/11 ? There are various articles on line that show why they chose 9/11. It was all because of Europe. The USA is the child of Europe - it was people from Europe that went and built the USA. So they want to take the USA, as well as Europe, because Islam failed to take Europe again and again on or about the eleventh of September: see the Siege of Vienna parts 1 and 2, see the battle of Zentra, see the Siege of Malta. All these battles and sieges broken on or about the eleventh of September. The Spanish tried to tolerate Muslims remaining for a while, but the keep causing trouble so they proclaimed in Valencia on another eleventh of September that all Muslims finally had to leave Spain. And now the fool west is about to let them take Europe as though that isn't going to embolden them even more to try and enslave the rest of the world as Muhammad is supposed to have said eg Al Tabari Volume 6 Page 95.

[@watchman4todayreloaded192]

"The Quran, unlike the Bible, is not a stand alone document." The Quran claims to be a complete book, but it isn't (would that it really were). There are many fatal verses in the Quran but one is the surah of abrogation Quran 2:106, which in short tells you that the later verses are supposed to overrule or replace earlier ones. Why is this fatal? Because the Quran has no order to it. It has no logical order, and no chronological order, so you don't know from the Quran alone which verses are supposed to be earlier or later than which others. You can try and wade through the nonsense of the hadiths (and tafsirs if you believe that stuff) to try and come up with an order yourself, but the Muslim "scholars" are supposed to have done it for us, and we can download and laugh at what a dog's dinner they say the Quran is. According to the official order of revelation not only are the surahs or chapters all mixed up with surahs from Mecca between surahs from Medina, and vice versa but parts of the Quran have been shredded, and shreds of one or two verses from Mecca are actually found INSIDE surahs from Medina, and vice versa. One theory is that this is actually deliberate. They don't want anyone to be able to read it coherently. They want to make it so fools only understand their so-called experts the sheikhs and imams etc. But then when you read 9:31 you see that taking your leaders words about what is forbidden and what is allowed is according to their logic worshipping those leaders instead of allah.