“The problem with the world is that the intelligent people are full of doubts, while the stupid ones are full of confidence.” ― Charles Bukowski
@nighaghfe8065Ай бұрын
some beliefs have become bias and deeply embedded in people's psyche so when you criticize it they instantly perceive you as a sassy, despicable person and it's not about whether its true or not but they just can't let to go of it and therefore accept it. as kafka puts it, by believing passionately in something that still dose not exist, we create it.
@jameskewley9440Ай бұрын
Check out Dunning Kruger. JK
@WindbadgerАй бұрын
That's a ridiculous generalisation, from some guy who said something once.
@janman55Ай бұрын
@@Windbadger Are you sure of that?
@WindbadgerАй бұрын
@@janman55 is there an echo here? 😁 Yes - very sure.
@kronoticАй бұрын
It's pretty clear he thinks Piers is a fool but doesn't want to say it to his face.
@patrickthomas2119Ай бұрын
then why does he keep coming on the show?
Ай бұрын
He was struggling with so many senseless questions.
@coffee.and.code89Ай бұрын
@patrickthomas2119 promoting his tour/book, money, debate.... You think every guest that goes on a talkshow, likes the host? Piers has a lot of guests and I'd guess a significantly large proportion don't like him lol.
@oxidaenitros5670Ай бұрын
@@kronotic I mean... Who doesn't? 😂
@cristianflorin5970Ай бұрын
How tf doesn't Piers realise that you can also ask what was there before God.
@DianeMerriamАй бұрын
"I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned." ~ Richard P. Feynman
@JohnPopcorn06Ай бұрын
What is God? - That is a question for you.
@DianeMerriamАй бұрын
@@JohnPopcorn06 The absence of proof is not proof of absence. That leaves it to faith, belief without proof. So where a person stands depends on how much proof they require before professing belief.
@tatsuyakuragi3578Ай бұрын
There's certainly more proof to existence of God rather than not existing
@JFat5158Ай бұрын
@@tatsuyakuragi3578 There is no proof. All religions require faith, which is the absence of proof. The fact that there isnt an established existence of a god is enough to act as if one likely doesnt exist.
@josecortez1268Ай бұрын
@@DianeMerriam, isso é o que distingue os crédulos, acreditar em explicações fáceis por ser intelectualmente mais acessível(falsos profetas, falsos salvadores da pátria, falsas e simples explicações para assuntos complexos etc de um pensador crítico que não afirma ter certezas em vão, que precisa de evidências para suportar algo absurdo. "Ausência de evidência NÃO É evidência de ausência" não pode passar a "Ausência de evidência É evidência de ausência" só porque não percebeu o que significa a expressão!
@eran5005Ай бұрын
If Professor Dawkins didn’t think Piers is a fool before, certainly he does now.
@Disgruntled_CanadianАй бұрын
Dawkins is the only fool I see
@eran5005Ай бұрын
@@Disgruntled_Canadian well that speaks volumes.
@mohammadtajabadiАй бұрын
Exactly! I was feeling secondhand embarrassment with each stupid question he raised!
@Ace-mw9pmАй бұрын
@@mohammadtajabadigive an example
@afsar_gunner5271Ай бұрын
Prof Clown Dawkins made a complete fool of himself. How dumb and stupid did he look ?? ..keep using the words Nature? Randon? Implying that there is no intelligence beyond the universe, multi-verse. LOL LOL LOL @ Dawkins
@GrantBoonzaierАй бұрын
Piers, that was awful. Your worst interview by a mile.
@Danijel_128Ай бұрын
Do you care to elaborate? I think he said a lot of interesting things.
@Danijel_128Ай бұрын
@@KindnessIsKing1000 For example, the part about the creation of the universe - that time began with the Big Bang, and that human conception cannot grasp the idea of no time and therefore, the understanding of the creation is not logical to us.
@Danijel_128Ай бұрын
Beg your pardon. I think you were talking about Mr Dawkins.
@GrantBoonzaierАй бұрын
@@Danijel_128 that doesn't mean there's a God that answers our prayers and cares about us. Not understanding something does not equal God.
@Danijel_128Ай бұрын
@GrantBoonzaier I *thougt you were talking about Mr Dawkins.
@SteveEricJordanАй бұрын
piers morgan vs. richard dawkins is always the pairing with the biggest disparity in intelligence i've seen.
@medidmiАй бұрын
One is a fool , other is Dawkins ❤😂
@highdesertbikerАй бұрын
Piers think he is winning here and he just isnt using words correctly.
@danielharrington5690Ай бұрын
@@medidmiDawkins fans are definitely fans
@danielharrington5690Ай бұрын
@@highdesertbiker piers think he win this talk but he no win talk
@dkdkproductions1192Ай бұрын
@@danielharrington5690 excellent prose and grammar!!!
@nunya5136Ай бұрын
"Piers is a fool" was just an opinion until Piers proved it to be a fact 😬🤭
@ProgressIsTheOnlyEvolutionАй бұрын
And you don't think Richard Dawkins is? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Shadylady418117 күн бұрын
Nope that’s all you
@gojira69Ай бұрын
I don't think piers actually heard or understood anything Dawkins said
@johnreed5056Ай бұрын
Because I thought Dawkins was going to give intelligent response but he just kept beating around the bush on hypothesis that he wants everybody to believe is reality while it’s not proven to be reality.
@David-cm4okАй бұрын
Is this your first experience of Piers?
@PraderaaaАй бұрын
They never do, people are ignorant beyond belief
@kiriakozАй бұрын
welcome to this channel. It's about how a man is impervious to logic and only listens to people in order to know when to talk at them when they stop speaking for a millisecond.
@willbrooks3490Ай бұрын
Richard doesn't actually KNOW how the Universe came into existence and he bluffed and blustered and tried unsuccessfully behind 'just ask physicists' - in other words he has FAITH in humans who are physicists even though he doesn't KNOW what they are talking about! And that from a man who pours scorn on those who believe in God (based on hard facts and evidence)!
@Phil-p7pАй бұрын
Richard Dawkins agrees Piers Morgan isn't a fool ... Piers Morgan then starts talking ... Dawkins thinks "Oh Christ ... it's far worse than I originally thought". 🤣
@niftybaker5967Ай бұрын
Him thinking "oh Christ" is funny in itself
@AnthonyMathonyAdiuАй бұрын
😅😅😅😅😅
@ProgressIsTheOnlyEvolutionАй бұрын
Richard Dawkins mind is not made to understand the mysteries of what is a fool and what isn't 🤣
@Dan-cy4tiАй бұрын
So this is the interview that Piers should not have done. He comes across as an unintelligent teenager. Everything Richard said was very clear and understandable.
@jdarminАй бұрын
I think my favorite part was "how can you understand the origin of life without understanding the origin of the universe." as if you have to understand everything in the universe to understand something specific within it.
@jasonhmcleanАй бұрын
How he compared our understanding of pre big bang to the origin of life is idiocy. So stupid on many levels
@letscatchthemall6862Ай бұрын
Nothing exploding Billions of years Life starting from rocks Fish to fishermen Dinosaur to bird Oort Cloud Surfing monkeys Squid from space ^ I can keep going on but these are a handful of Dawkins “sky daddies” lol
@d3adagain385Ай бұрын
@@letscatchthemall6862🤡 Read a book. Not the fantasy one.
@FedeM_Reaper789Ай бұрын
@@d3adagain385 those things he listed are fantasies too, maybe you're a bit confused...
@TastySanchezАй бұрын
Piers was clearly not intelligent enough to interview Richard properly here and it shows.
@willbrooks3490Ай бұрын
Give just one example.
@aakashaggarwal685Ай бұрын
@@willbrooks3490saying should i not take anything in that book seriously when richard said immortal was a poetic device
@ProgressIsTheOnlyEvolutionАй бұрын
Its pretty hard though to interview a man who admits that he himself does not understand what he is actually saying 😁
@willbrooks3490Ай бұрын
@@ProgressIsTheOnlyEvolution Looking at it from a different perspective I think it is very easy to interview Richard. Just ask him a relevant question e.g. "When you admit, as you have done, Richard, you don't KNOW how the Universe came into existence, you are also admitting, that when you refer to physicists who claim to KNOW but they don't actually KNOW, that yours is a FAITH (in physicists) position, IS IT NOT?"
@Fladderfinken9 күн бұрын
@@willbrooks3490 It's not a question of FAITH it's about honesty and understanding your own scientific limitations. An honest scientist will not claim to know things outside of their expertise. The difference is that if you want to understand the beginning of the Universe you can ask a physicist and they will try to explain - if you ask a theist FAITH is enough and they will claim to know WITHOUT understanding.
@heroiamareloАй бұрын
Piers question about the "Immortal Gene" are very disrespectful. It's easy to understand what Dawkins is trying to say with "Immortal" even though it's not literally immortal. The question is just a random attack. And it's not the only time this had happened.
@roro-mm7ccАй бұрын
It's like he doesn't understand the concept of a metaphor.
@Curator134Ай бұрын
@@roro-mm7cc He understands exactly what Dawkins meant but he can't accept that because it would destroy his agenda.
@Caseous703Ай бұрын
@@heroiamarelo Immortal just means something would "live" forever under normal circumstances. Doesn't mean indestructible, so if in the fable of Adam and Eve they'd eaten from the tree of life they still wouldn't survive the expansion of the Sun consuming the planet in a billion years from now either.
@enemariusАй бұрын
Its just payback for calling him a fool. So Richard provoked him...
@DarkShadow66177Ай бұрын
@@Curator134😂😂
@thatitguy1980Ай бұрын
Piers: Do you regret calling it the immortal gene? Richard: I take it back. You are a fool.
@stalker7892Ай бұрын
No human mind can conceive of anything being caused by something that doesn't exist. Dawkins walks away speaking none sense and asking you to believe it. And it must be outside of time and space a priori.
@jovonn8303Ай бұрын
You thinkt he world was created by a god that doesn't exist sooooooo@@stalker7892
@NicAmmonsАй бұрын
@@stalker7892 So you admit your entire belief system is based on the limitations of your imagination?
@Rawjugga0Ай бұрын
@NicAmmons so you believe in the scientific impossibility that nothing created everything I guess?
@declanfoley7113Ай бұрын
@stalker7892 you think it matters what is conceivable by the human mind? Can you conceive the vastness of the universe, the Cosmic Web etc? Evidence is what matters and Christianity and all of the other ancient religions have been found wanting.
@owlympian1550Ай бұрын
As a theist myself, one extremely strongly rooted in that belief, Richard Dawkins is by far the more intelligent, respectful and sensible of the two.
@WigganNuGАй бұрын
one must be one of those actual true believers who have faith. I believe people like you. People who argue to prove their god never believed in him in the first place.
@muhammadsaadkhan196Ай бұрын
Respectful??? He just called God a sky daddy ,thats what is actually Appauhling.
@JudeT-G29 күн бұрын
Lmao you kiss his feet too much @@muhammadsaadkhan196
@lmhmanninghotmail24 күн бұрын
@@muhammadsaadkhan196 he is. Grow up. Religion is embarrassing. It’s so stupid and brainless….. the universe is so enormous, so so so so huge…. And your ‘God’ created it just for a single type of ape? Hahhahahahahahha Grow up. We are just another animal. Stop being so self important and narcissistic. We are animals who have been around for a tiny tiny tiny period of time in a tiny tiny part of an enormous universe….. crocodiles have been around for millions of years. Why are we so important? Fool
@Void-yv2qu16 күн бұрын
So?
@deepaktripathi4417Ай бұрын
I appreciate professor Dawkins' patience while dealing with stupidity and nitpicking. You must know basic things before you talk to a scientist. Piers doesn't understand what Bigbang means in the scientific realm.
@ABC123jdАй бұрын
It means something they made up out of thin air
@xR1noАй бұрын
27:57 If you would spend an eternity doing what you'd do on you last day in life, it would lose all its meaning and gradually turn into a living nightmare. Moments are precious because they don't last! Life is precious because it's transient!
@pimpozzaАй бұрын
Great comment.. well said! 👍
@TrishRyan-ey8goАй бұрын
For some people it already has
@dreadlord5581Ай бұрын
And that is so easy to comprehend that it does indeed showcase Piers as a fool.
@xR1noАй бұрын
@@dreadlord5581 Absolutely!
@WiseTrails1Ай бұрын
Except if an Almighty being has ability to create satisfaction never ending to infinity, in a different type of timeless realm.
@theMatrix440Ай бұрын
"You you ever find yourself almost praying?" Never, until now, I'm praying that this interview will be over soon."
@wolvesdawnАй бұрын
it was painful, Piers doesn't get it...
@crabtree2100Ай бұрын
I'm surprised Dawkins didn't get up and storm out; it almost looked like he was going to on a few occasions.
@angusMcloud84Ай бұрын
@@wolvesdawn man your ego is crazy 😂
@okulusanomali9716Ай бұрын
😁
@MR-DUROАй бұрын
lol
@alex_g_44Ай бұрын
In Germany, we have a saying: "One fool can ask more questions than ten wise men can answer." Of course, one could argue that it's an interviewer's job to ask questions. The problem here is that Pierce isn't asking to get a conversation going, but is trying to pose shallow "gotcha questions" hoping for sensational soundbites.
@LongWeiner-x9yАй бұрын
Believing in god=fool Even though it makes some happy. Believing a persona w/ a weiner is a woman= what a wonderful and true thing and if u disagree u r eve ill...
Ай бұрын
Wie sagt man auf Deutsch? Ich lerne Deutsch. I mean, the saying
@davidsheriff9274Ай бұрын
I think they call that The Gish Gallop.
@alex_g_44Ай бұрын
Das Sprichwort besagt: ein Narr fragt mehr als zehn Weise beantworten können.
@bjrnchrstnАй бұрын
@@alex_g_44similar in Dutch.
@BackroomCastingCouch-mm3shАй бұрын
i thought it was unfair to call piers a fool the first time, but after this he proved that's what he is
@PeterMoore-k2gАй бұрын
I know….. “We don’t know so god did it” How boring
@joeoleary9010Ай бұрын
@@PeterMoore-k2g Yes, we can't explain how everything came from nothing, and so God *must* have done it.
@pheebs818Ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@christopherwhite6496Ай бұрын
He can't fathom "before"the big bang, but has no problem with "eternity".😂
@javi3701Ай бұрын
@@PeterMoore-k2gNo, you look at a water bottle and you know someone designed and produced it, now look at yourself, you're not just attached like clay, you have millions and millions of functions inside your body that are still being discovered, all your neurons, bones, synapses, cells, organs etc, now if I believe a simple water bottle has been produced and created by someone, how can I say the human body was a random cell mutation, my own body is evidence of intelligence, of something amazing, it didn't come by naturally, our own existence is the evidence of an intelligent creator. Atheism is arrogance.
@maxduroАй бұрын
That was, indeed, one of the most pestilential interviews I've ever witnessed. Just a barrage of nonsensical questions, seemingly designed solely to provoke controversial soundbites rather than to foster meaningful conversation. I must commend Richard for maintaining his composure throughout.
@r4h4alАй бұрын
Not the first time that's been said about Richard.
@dreadlord5581Ай бұрын
I don't know how he does it. It is the ultimate irony that he has - the patience of a Saint.
@wackykids3 күн бұрын
Now I have to leave this comment for a quick Google check. BRB
@knarfx4732Ай бұрын
After watching the whole thing this interview is like the teacher trying to explain something to the student who never gets it 😂😂
@302indianАй бұрын
That’s why I would never engage Dawkins in a debate.
@Tofuu131128 күн бұрын
Piers isn't listening, he's just waiting for his turn to speak
@callmeshen9754Ай бұрын
It’s just amazing to witness how brilliant Dawkins is as a person. At his age, Remarkable truly amazing to witness.
@cripysmooth6092Ай бұрын
For those wondering, the "question he didn't want to be asked" was about Islam. Dawkins looked very uncomfortable due to the repercussions of offending Muslims and his personal safety.
@BeMoreRhinoАй бұрын
So like the British government?
@deviouskris3012Ай бұрын
@@BeMoreRhinoso like the UK when Christians were in total control. Remember when they burnt priests alive in London, just because they were not trinitarians.
@urbantrekkerАй бұрын
So he's happy to offend all other religions publicly, but not Islam. Understood. Super heroic.🙄
@user-vh7zpАй бұрын
So it's easier to offend Christians because they're civilised, whilst you need to avoid islamists for physical safety and jews to avoid being called an anti-semite. Make it makes sense
@BlacksmithTWDАй бұрын
@@urbantrekker Na, he doesn't even know about 90% of the other religions. He is a great biologist, he is a quite ignorant about theology and general philosophy. What rather surprises me is that when it comes to another scientific field, he doesn't even want to make any claims about it other than that he doesn't understand it enough to say something sensible about it, but when it comes to another branch of philosophy than the scientific he claims to knows better.
@pimpozzaАй бұрын
Not impressed with Piers on this occasion.. he asked Richard Dawkins some very childish questions and kept trying to back him into a corner.. Mr Dawkins was clearly getting frustrated and deserves more respect! Piers, he'll be calling you a "fool" again..
@andymorrell6485Ай бұрын
when are you ever
@pimpozzaАй бұрын
@@andymorrell6485 I am usually..
@pimpozzaАй бұрын
@@andymorrell6485 I actually usually like Piers..
@Ignacyjablonski12Ай бұрын
Do you agree with him eating a steak infront of a vegan? Whether you are vegan or not, you gotta admit it was a rude thing to do.@pimpozza
@pimpozzaАй бұрын
@@Ignacyjablonski12 YT deleted my reply for reasons unknown.. nothing new there then! Piers wasn't rude in my opinion for eating some steak.. He was simply reacting to a spate of d*sruptive vegan demonstrations.. Pouring milk on shop floors and invad*ng restaurants! Now THAT is rude! 🤦🏻♀️ As Piers himself said, what he _doesn't_ do is go running into vegan restaurants and start screaming at people and have to be carried out!
@Hack3r91Ай бұрын
32:38 The moment Richard Dawkins wholly regretted giving Piers a second chance
@gtlogic6023Ай бұрын
Jesus Christ it was hard to watch.
@mattosborne84Ай бұрын
Richard was far nicer to Piers than he should’ve been.
@daygoroperez7504Ай бұрын
He shouldn't push the issues too much when his explanations were that weak.
@DeepfriedfunkАй бұрын
@@daygoroperez7504do you not realize how unbelievably childish and immature piers’ questions are. It’s like talking to an 8 year old. Weak questions get weak answers
@xB0505Ай бұрын
@@daygoroperez7504 You don't need to know every answer to be an atheist
@photophobАй бұрын
I think you should be highly suspicious of anyone who thinks smoking cigars and watching football games FOR F*CKING ETERNITY will not eventually become unbearable. This shows a significant lack of introspective thought and imagination. Don't ever give power to such people.
@ABC123jdАй бұрын
Idk that sounds pretty good to me
@enekaitzteixeira7010Ай бұрын
@@ABC123jd You clearly don't grasp the concept of eternity.
@ABC123jdАй бұрын
@@enekaitzteixeira7010 And you do?
@psychoman88614 күн бұрын
With a little bit of thought, doing any one thing for eternity would be a nightmare @@ABC123jd
@knucklesamidge3 күн бұрын
@@ABC123jd imagine doing it for 10 trillion trillion trillion trillion years… and then.. you’ve still made 0 progress to it being over.. no matter how many billions of days in a row you smoke your cigars with your friends, you still have to do it again for more billions and billions of years.. and then… you’ve still no closer to it being over. You’ve talked about every possible thing with your friends you could ever talk about. Every funny thing has already been said a billion times and it’s no longer funny. You never have a new thought or feeling.. and then still trillions and trillions of years in front of you with no end in sight.. you’re trapped. Really sit and have a deep think about what that would be like. Try doing it for 1 month on holiday and see how fxking bored you get
@moonchild7033Ай бұрын
I completely agree with Richard Dawkins. I don't know why Piers is being so aggressive & confrontational. No wonder Richard said he thinks Piers is a fool - he's really acting like one! Piers' brain could fit into Richard's pinky!
@andrewdouglas1963Ай бұрын
Piers is the interviewer. It's his job to challenge the people he interviews. Dawkins can't say piers is a fool when he believes nothing caused something lol.
@angelosophyАй бұрын
Why? Because hes not just accepting what modern physicists tell him to? “Human intuition doesnt cut it” ist a good justification to have blind faith in a concept that cant be proven or disproven. Am i talking about God or the big bang?
@andrewdouglas1963Ай бұрын
@ThrupenceBarkley Correct. Well done 👍
@angelosophyАй бұрын
@@ThrupenceBarkley God is not a material being thus is not subject to material causality. Your big bang, however, is. Thanks for demonstrating your irrationality
@angelosophyАй бұрын
@@andrewdouglas1963 See above ^😚
@danssigrathod5088Ай бұрын
pointless asking Dawkins questions he will never know the answers to what about the XAI650K thing you in it?
@pramodbagde1465Ай бұрын
How long is it open?
@RaahilShaikh-cj7kbАй бұрын
But this is no meme right?
@VikashSingh-dv4noАй бұрын
Elon failed horribly with X
@papusaikiya-jk4deАй бұрын
strong movement on this!!
@kailashpanchal824Ай бұрын
When was this released?
@KirkpatrickSoundsАй бұрын
Would be great if Piers had someone like Sean Carroll on who is not only a top-tier theoretical physicist but also one of the best communicators on the matter.
@therick363Ай бұрын
Exactly! Kinda makes you think why doesn’t he ask him instead of a biologist….
@DC-zi6seАй бұрын
Comforting delusions are better for Piers than Cold impersonal facts. Infact for all theists, be it Christians, Muslims and so on and so forth.
@adamwright4135Ай бұрын
Piers was already struggling to understand Dawkins' layman explanation, and too pig-headed to even try
@johnbatson8779Ай бұрын
Except that he cannot even understand what a woman is
@G35-z4jАй бұрын
I'm a Catholic but I love that Dawkins is looking bouncier lately and seems to have his old grit back. We don't have to agree with him, but he's still an interesting man.
@forughsemadeni8517Ай бұрын
Piers is not a fool but he is acting like one. What are these questions? I‘m so bored.
@midas61Ай бұрын
Not true. Morgan is a fool, he just hides it well most of the time.
@junioafonsocruz7463Ай бұрын
Do not pretend you don't understand. Dawkins simply can't say the origin of the matter of the first energy but ge says there's no creator.
@JAWS-qj1rjАй бұрын
@@junioafonsocruz7463Dawkins knows we don't know everything. But that's no excuse to beleive in childish things such as creator/magic. Grow up.
@danielhammond3218Ай бұрын
Piers is asking very important questions. You are thinking from one perspective and not a holistic perspective. Dawkins only speaks from a scientific materialist perspective.
@paulhancock1530Ай бұрын
That’s coz he’s a fool
@beliefisnotachoiceАй бұрын
I wish people could understand that when we don't know the answer to a question, the correct answer is I don't know. This does not give us license to simply invent an answer.
@thomasmann4536Ай бұрын
You can believe to have some insight into a question without fully knowing an answer. In fact, many skeptics and the existentialist schools of thought contend that it's impossible to know anything. Under this assumption, would you never say or act at all because you don't fully know?
@andrewdouglas1963Ай бұрын
True. But theres no reason why we can't infer the best explanation from the evidence we do have. In courtrooms people are convicted on evidence even though the jury doesn't know for sure.
@thomasmann4536Ай бұрын
@@andrewdouglas1963 ofc we can. it's just in some cases, there is no evidence pointing either way, but you still have to make a decision. In court, this usually means "in dubio pro reo", although lately that seems to be faltering ...
@andrewdouglas1963Ай бұрын
@@thomasmann4536 In some cases there is no evidence either way, but that's not the case with the topic in question. There is evidence which points towards an intelligent creator (God).
@MoreMortal-ld3srАй бұрын
@@andrewdouglas1963no there is not.
@jovialgent9963Ай бұрын
Asking how can you understand the origins of life if you don't understand the origin of the universe is just a false equivalence fallacy & like a fool, Piers keeps banging that drum!
@enekaitzteixeira7010Ай бұрын
How can you understand a local election in your city if you don't understand the rise of the Egiptian Empire?
@brigwood765812 сағат бұрын
I can see RD after this exchange ... "I've changed my mind ... PM is a fool in ALL senses of the word, across all time, space ... and even in the mysterious realm prior the big bang" lol
@roytrippАй бұрын
I am someone who enjoys Piers Morgan's interviews to some extend. But in this one he was childish and tried to challenge some unnecessary points. Richard Dawkins will go down in history as one of the greatest of our time and he just wasted a chance that many of us would like to have.
@KuroroGRyodanАй бұрын
It’s not that Richard’s brain was way too big for Piers, your “great” hero simply had no answers 😂
@roytrippАй бұрын
@@KuroroGRyodan in which moment he had no answer? Did you watch the interview?
@KuroroGRyodanАй бұрын
@@roytripp I watched every minute of the discussion. He was lost and claimed some questions were too silly for his great mind to even entertain😂 If they’re too easy why not answer them and move on? Being ignorant is one thing but being arrogant & ignorant is another Sadly you atheists look down on theists and have the most arrogance and lowest ability to consider other opinions.
@vids595Ай бұрын
@@KuroroGRyodan He is asking questions about cosmology to a biologist.
@KuroroGRyodanАй бұрын
@@roytripp I watched the whole interview actually. Your boy was fumbling all the way through. Put your emotions and biases aside and rewatch the interview. Atheist never had any substantive answers, all they do is theorize and make unprovable claims, the Quran actually predicts this
@rdx__dinesh__10k______Ай бұрын
It seems that God wouldn’t come into existence until Richard Dawkins agrees. you joined XAI650K actually?
@akashbhumij8280Ай бұрын
Finally they got it out, I thought it takes longer
@RaviRaj-i2oАй бұрын
Where do you find that?
@performanceprogamer3411Ай бұрын
I know many bots pump that but it is a real project, value going up, I got in there and know that it is for real man
@pranabtiwari5848Ай бұрын
lol Elon said something about this when he talked to Lex I recall
@majerdhillon7170Ай бұрын
Do not think that is a bad joke they know their thing
@JukeboxJunkie7Ай бұрын
Everyone should read at least one of Dawkins' books. He is a remarkably clear thinker and a phenomenal writer.
@feralmodeАй бұрын
when i witness the beauty and clarity of richard dawkins mind it confirms my belief in our holy creator. praise be to god!
@RedefineLivingАй бұрын
No, is grossly inconsistent. On one hand, he asserts that we are dancing to the tune of our own DNA, but on the other hand, he makes moral declarations as they are objective. On one hand, he rejects the notion of intelligent design, but on the other hand, he concedes that life could be intelligently designed and seeded here by aliens.
@angelosophyАй бұрын
@@JukeboxJunkie7 Nah i’d rather just read the bible. Have you seen how many connections and self references there are contained within it?? An entire lifetime of study still wouldnt yield a complete understanding of this one single book
@johnreed5056Ай бұрын
He’s also a fool who starts all of his explanations with a hypothesis making you all sheeps to be reality without proving it to be real
@myla6135Ай бұрын
Dawkins has written some popular science, but he's not a real scientist and some of the ways he has popularised thinking on this topic is no longer the way evolutionary scientists think anymore. I believe he popularised the work of two serious scientists in particular: John Maynard Smith and William Hamilton. Having read some of the former's work and also the work of a few other serious scientists (although I'm just an interested layperson, not a scientist) I say that with some confidence.
@shotarokaneda7525Ай бұрын
The difference with atheists and believers is simple. we say "I don't know, but if anyone has a logical reason you can convince me". The answer for believers is "I know and nobody can convince me otherwise".
@eddifabricio3750Ай бұрын
Hmmmm... Agnostics say "you may convince me", atheists claim "we know God doesn't exist, and you can't convince me otherwise"...
@vids595Ай бұрын
@@eddifabricio3750 Nearly all atheists are agnostic atheists.
@pineappletom102Ай бұрын
@@eddifabricio3750 Not really. If I told you that there was an invisible unicorn in every room, you would probably come back with the same "That's ridiculous, I don't believe in that" that an atheist would give you about god. If god suddenly appeared in the sky and gave some big message to the world, I don't think most atheists would have a problem with changing their minds and believing. It's just at the moment there is no good evidence at all to support the belief in any of the major gods
@kokica007Ай бұрын
@@pineappletom102god showed up in a body of Jesus Christ, did miracles for people to see and still not everyone believed.. So i dont think you are as honest as you want to think you are
@pineappletom102Ай бұрын
To take it a step further, if the bible is adequate evidence for you to believe in a christian god, I would ask why you don't also believe in the quran, hinduism, or even old norse or roman gods who equally have stories written about them?
@petermuller6359Ай бұрын
This comment section shows a sharp divide between thinkers and believers.
@jennarmour8356Ай бұрын
It is hardly that black and white.
@mikhem1962Ай бұрын
Thinkers are content with the position that they 'do not know'. Believers must have an answer, they cannot bear to 'not' have an answer. A mind that exists outside of space and time can be the answer to anything and everything. That's all well and good. You just have to prove it exists first. You can't do that, You can simply believe it to be so, and no one can challenge you on it because it's undetectable.
@Adan-g5pАй бұрын
@@mikhem1962 “Every one who is seriously involved in the pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the Universe-a spirit vastly superior to that of man, and one in the face of which we with our modest powers must feel humble.” Albert Einstein
@stephendianda1543Ай бұрын
True but just because you call yourself a thinker doesn't mean you have an intelligent brain.
@petermuller6359Ай бұрын
@@stephendianda1543 No such claim.
@mtdouthit1291Ай бұрын
Us skeptics don’t have to answer any of your questions, the burden of proof is on YOU.
@angelosophyАй бұрын
Thats not true. Burden of proof rests on the one who is positing a claim that goes against what is conventionally held as the popular belief in the world/society. If more people are theists than they are atheists, then youre challenging the conventionally held belief system, so YOU have to prove it. Sorry pal. No more hiding behind hypocrisy. You have blind faith that you cant prove as much as a Christian does. Difference is that the validity of the bible is being proven true more and more with each archeology site being dug up lol
@fearless_chrollo8213Ай бұрын
If you want proof, you can start reading about the prophecies of muhammed peace be upon him and the scientific miracles of the quran.
@Alisonn2Ай бұрын
@@fearless_chrollo8213you mean the part where it says every single living creature has 2 genders? Or sperm is stored in the backbone? Or the moon was split into 2 parts? Shall i go on cuz this could take paragraphs
@dmaxwell910901Ай бұрын
@@fearless_chrollo8213 That's not proof my dude..
@Chad-n5iАй бұрын
@@Alisonn2or the earth is flat or the sun set in a muddy oasis or the sun bend down to god throne at night or the sun rotate around earth or the stars become projectile to hit devils
@gungaloscrungalo892515 күн бұрын
Piers really comes across as somebody who has never heard any of the arguments against the existence of God, ever.
@brigwood765812 сағат бұрын
I can see RD after this exchange ... "I've changed my mind ... PM is a fool in ALL senses of the word, across all time, space ... and even in the mysterious realm prior the big bang" lol
@BCSforeign2026Ай бұрын
Piers just proved Richard Dawkins right, yeah 'he is a fool'
@marciagreen744Ай бұрын
Piers is annoyed with Dawkins for calling him a fool and saying he interrupts a lot. So he's deliberately being a twit by interrupting him more than usual.
@MrsBridgette2012Ай бұрын
Piers saying he’d never get bored spending eternity doing the same thing is ridiculous. He just assumes he wouldn’t be bored.
@OG_johnsmithАй бұрын
How could you get bored of basking in the infinite?
@MrsBridgette2012Ай бұрын
@@OG_johnsmith Ultimately, no one truly knows what eternity holds, and assuming we wouldn’t get bored oversimplified the complexities of existence that we can't yet comprehend. If reincarnation in different forms across the universe is a possibility, then perhaps boredom could be avoided as we constantly encounter new experiences.
@Caseous703Ай бұрын
@@MrsBridgette2012 That's just passing the time to avoid the boredom ... but that may be all there is.
@danielnofalАй бұрын
@@MrsBridgette2012 some friends, a cigar and a French wine for eternity? I would be bored a couple of hours into that . Especially if Piers is asking the questions.
@nickinportlandАй бұрын
This will make people in the sciences cringe big time. The whole reason we have the scientific method is because we can’t trust our senses and logic.
@LittleMAC78Ай бұрын
My only bit of self awareness is that I know I will never know enough about anything to accept the argument that 'the only explanation must be the supernatural'. Who has that much 'faith' (downright hubris, really!) to proclaim their senses and logic are aware and have perceived EVERYTHING it is possible to comprehend? As professional comedian (but academically a graduate of Mathematical and Theoretical Physics) Dara O'Briain once said in one of his routines discussing Science: "Science knows it doesn't know everything. Otherwise it would stop!"
@nickinportlandАй бұрын
@@LittleMAC78 yup. I’m a fan of Piers but he’s out of his depth here big time. Like he’s talking to a dude about string theory and is like well I set my coffee cup down what do you mean it could pass through the table 😅. Like bruh.
@ricciabbey.Ай бұрын
That's Just dumb, If we can't trust our sense and logic, we can trust anything, science requires sense and logic to work
@LittleMAC78Ай бұрын
@@ricciabbey. any event that occurs does not require the observer to be able to comprehend it for it to exist. Science is the TESTING of the observations to externally verify our hypotheses arrived at via our senses and logic
@PervySage723Ай бұрын
What scientific method can you use for the big bang? There is none. Its not science
@kumaranvijАй бұрын
Piers Morgan: "I get more viewers if I say the universe is created. More viewers gives me more money, power, and influence. Therefore, the universe must have a creator." Bang, can't argue with that one. The biggest bang of them all, the one that hits Morgan's ego right in the tingly spot.
@CreamageАй бұрын
An analogy for the "cultural christian" concept is essentially "I don't sing myself, but I like listening to singers because it's enjoyable and entertaining". It really isn't a difficult concept.
@jimmythegem6582Ай бұрын
An analogy for the "cultural atheist" concept is essentially "hating an invisible God makes it easier for me to accept my flaming homosexuality" 😂😂🤣🤣
@wallywest7800Ай бұрын
So you wouldn't call yourself a "cultural singer" then. I enjoy the concepts and themes of modern construction. Would it make sense to call myself a "cultural construction worker"? No, I am not a construction worker at all. I just enjoy watching it take place.
@jonah9861Ай бұрын
Atheism is for ternagers.
@sebastiano728Ай бұрын
@@wallywest7800 That's because singing itself isn't a culture, whereas Christianity is. The logic of the analogy still works. If you want a more direct comparison, someone could engage a lot with Japanese culture, music, food, but not agree with the constitution or care for the government. Maybe they don't even speak Japanese. They themselves aren't legally Japanese, they only enjoy the cultural side of Japan, so they don't really have any obligation to subscribe to Japanese philosophy, history, or what it means to be Japanese in spirit, even if they do like the culture that came from that philosophy, history, constitution, what have you.
@wallywest7800Ай бұрын
@@sebastiano728 Christianity is not a culture it's a recognized religion. If you call yourself a Christian in any way that implies you believe in its teachings and participate in them, either entirely or selectively. The logic doesn't actually work. You wouldn't call yourself "culturally Japanese" that would just be odd. What makes more sense is that you admire some aspects of Japanese life. He could just say he likes some aspects of Christian theology. To say he is "anything' Christian is a bit silly. If you don't believe in God, you aren't Christian anything. It doesn't matter if you admire the teachings. Either you are Christian, or you aren't.
@noursoliman8265Ай бұрын
If I have a one wish it will be spending some years talking with Richard a man with nobel attitude, sharp intelligence, with a nice smile. I hope and I'm deeply connected to Richard Dawkins. I will guide my self and my kids to have his prospective and morals. Thanks Richard for the years you spent lightning our brains and soles. Thanks for making me love life and appreciate it's value. I wish you a happy years with your loved ones.
@smokingdamages7470Ай бұрын
“Supernatural sky Daddy” is so hilarious!!😂
@for-ALLAH-sakeАй бұрын
but you are not allowed to say that, there is no common sense before big bang and you cannot talk about something that happened before, that is science for you 😂
@smokingdamages7470Ай бұрын
@@for-ALLAH-sake …..oh no… you believe in a supernatural SKY DADDY!?! 😂 😂😂
@MrOlaolalaАй бұрын
Piers' inability to disassociate the "dawn of the universe" from "dawn of life on planet earth" is mind blowing. Two separate events. Billions of years in between.
@JrdweckАй бұрын
There we go again Pierce. “I don’t get it, therefore god”. Stop waving away your incredulity and invoking sky daddy.
@samardeep7642Ай бұрын
Piers: You know that that you don't believe that. who knows XAI650K ? This is the smartest thing I came across for a while
@AfrozKhan258-nk1icАй бұрын
I know many bots pump that but it is a real project, value going up, I got in there and know that it is for real man
@VikasRawat-yj9ceАй бұрын
How long is it open?
@MusharafMusharaf-ri2fyАй бұрын
Elon is just a different built guy
@Rajputw517Ай бұрын
You should know their video it is important
@amolmanatkar7644Ай бұрын
The big talk on Lex was detailed about this, too. This is a smart step ahead of all competition
@godusopp2752Ай бұрын
The fact that modern day religions came thousands of years after there were already known religions in the world is all the proof I need to know that religion is just what people use to explain the unexplainable at the time . Lightning was once explained as "oh zeus is angry" or "thor has awaken from his nap" The greeks lived and died before a man named jesusu ever walked the earth, the egyptians had hundreds of gods for different things
@TruRedCRIMEАй бұрын
its the same today, you just call it gravity or electricity, these are all inferred onto a pattern you see over and over again, nothing has changed. Youve no idea what causes these paterns.
@hellooutsiders6865Ай бұрын
The Bible explains that there were always false gods, it even mentions Satan as the god of this world....Given that Satan knows scripture and copies God in order to try to dethrone him and discredit him, there being many false gods isn't a surprise. We have many arguments against your line of thinking, I recommend you look into them.
@TVJM2856Ай бұрын
@@godusopp2752 just proves humans were created with the capacity and desire to worship something.
@CelticSpiritsCovenАй бұрын
The first people followed the same God as modern day Christians. Find a better argument.
@hellabella8295Ай бұрын
Piers little brain can’t comprehend logic..
@JessieMurryАй бұрын
To the question Piers kept asking about what was there before the big bang and that there must have been something... I would ask: What was there before god? You see religious people keep placing it on science to have every answer while avoiding having to answer anything themselves.
@angelosophyАй бұрын
@@JessieMurry God is an eternal being. There is no beginning or end to eternity. Try to contemplate what eternity means. Maybe you wont lose your mind in the process, but thats only if you really try.
@darthbog2125Ай бұрын
@@angelosophywhy don't you cut out the middle man and choose to believe the universe is eternal?
@angelosophyАй бұрын
@@darthbog2125 Because i have experienced answer to pray in real time. Like literally within seconds of it happening. NDAs from atheists who have never read the bible also line up perfectly with biblical teachings when they last long enough. Also, pretty much every archaeological site around a biblical landmark corroborates the stories of the bible, making it historically accurate.
@dreadlord5581Ай бұрын
@@angelosophy So God then is just psychopathic homicidal monster who gives babies cancer for fun 😐
@samueloak1600Ай бұрын
@@darthbog2125because Big Bang
@eliasfarah1789Ай бұрын
Some parts of the interview, Piers is clearly trolling Dawking.
@fitzjafaru7107Ай бұрын
Yes and no, Dawkins too seems to hide from saying his true feelings for fear of ridicule. Examine this; what both English men here missed the previous, before the big bang, what was, was not a thing. In English, everything is a thing. We know of things then work out what they are. In the place of nothing, if you read, not a thing, you will find no violation has been done to the language in terms of interpretation. The thing before the big bang, was not a thing, though it was, without a doubt there.
@loupasternakАй бұрын
@@fitzjafaru7107 dawkins hid from nothing .
@fitzjafaru7107Ай бұрын
@@loupasternak very clever of him, and the way different interpretations can flow from your quip, is the beauty, written or spoken of the language English.
@lucacuradossi1040Ай бұрын
no, he is just that stupid. Piers should stick to idiotic debates
@MaskOfCinderАй бұрын
31:36 Right here is where the trolling is evident.
@sipal9983Ай бұрын
In this interview with piers Dawkins is playing chess with a pigeon
@AwtsmoosАй бұрын
Then how did he lose
@thomastxtАй бұрын
He didnt, piers proofed he is a fool@@Awtsmoos
@awtodorАй бұрын
@@AwtsmoosThey didn't even argue really - show me where a religious text explains in detail what science has found for the big bang. Doesn't exist. These are books that claim ultimate truth. It was just a way to make Dawkins sound weak instead of any strong claim for religion. Oh we don't know what created everything, well obvious that validates Genesis now. It's just bad faith arguments.
@joshkeyserАй бұрын
You cannot use the line of reasoning that you can’t invoke matter before matter existed, but then say it makes no sense to use the same line of reasoning saying you can’t invoke “before” when referring to the beginning of time.
@JordanKL1Ай бұрын
Time started there, matter started there. Nothing before.
@joshkeyserАй бұрын
@@JordanKL1 energy before, singularity before, hope this helps.
@BobSmith-lb9ncАй бұрын
Dawkins has said that "It's highly plausible that in the universe there are Godlike creatures." Meaning very advanced sentient beings. Yet he cannot abide the actual existence of a god.
@itisjustacommentАй бұрын
Really? I doubt that or are you taking him out for context? He was very clear on his standing, saying why jump to the most implausible answer first rather than the most rational. It's simply Occam's razor fallacy. Why say you don't know the answer and that can't be true but there is a magical man?
@keppela1Ай бұрын
Godlike creatures would exist within the bounds of the universe. God is thought to be outside the bounds of the universe. Two completely different things.
@itisjustacommentАй бұрын
@JohnnyNoPockets No, it's just merely not believing in the most un-rational answer spoken in absolutes; we are just using Occam's razor fallacy. You are assuming falsely to cast out a stance .
@dmaxwell910901Ай бұрын
@JohnnyNoPockets Um you don't seem to know what atheism is. You can't have hatred for something you don't even believe in.
@kimbanton4398Ай бұрын
When has he ever said that?
@GuoJing2017Ай бұрын
"How can you not understand the origin of life if you don't understand the origin of the universe?" I'm sorry what? By that logic, you could say, "Lasagne is in the universe, I don't understand the origin of the universe. Therefore, i dont understand how to make a lasagne. "
@bernardpriceАй бұрын
There are some things simply beyond humans' understanding. This is not an excuse to invent an origin story to make us happy.
@soniadetert1733Ай бұрын
Totally agree
@NimiforJesusАй бұрын
True. Too high for humans
@Kenny-vb9gqАй бұрын
Agreed mate
@psidhu1979Ай бұрын
And what is your story?
@Kenny-vb9gqАй бұрын
@@psidhu1979 who you asking mate, I'm happy to tell.ypu my story
@enekaitzteixeira7010Ай бұрын
"Even if I'm perfectly aware that my guests doesn't want me to ask him a particular and personal question, is not able to answer it and it would make him feel very stressed and uncomfortable, I'd still ask him that question. I'm just like that".
@zzcottАй бұрын
It’s embarrassing for Piers. I don’t know if I can watch anymore. Painful to watch Richard have to endure this bafoon
@danielhammond3218Ай бұрын
It’s amazing the pride of the “intelligent“ mind. And yet see the utter foolishness of the same mind that lacks wisdom.
@bambamk1914Ай бұрын
I see you have all the answers please enlighten us more
@zzcottАй бұрын
@@bambamk1914 enlighten yourself with all the knowledge at your own convenience. You have internet, right? Learn critical thinking. Learn scientific method. Learn history. Learn humanism. Let go of all hatred for anyone and let’s start something new.
@BadgerBotherer1Ай бұрын
@@zzcott "bafoon". I think you mean "buffoon". Learn how to spell.
@lapizza7175Ай бұрын
@@bambamk1914 we don't have all the answers. no one does.
@wheetos33Ай бұрын
This is like watching a 5 year old having a conversation with an adult about something he simply can’t understand
@FedeM_Reaper789Ай бұрын
They both don't understand
@pradjosh1Ай бұрын
I am a cultural Hindu. I celebrate Hindu festivals, songs and dance. I love the art and architecture of Hindu temples. I visit temples occasionally and even perform certain rituals out of respect but I am atheist and oppose any dogma or discrimination in Hindu religion. I am atheist and admire Richard Dawkins for his clarity on atheism.
@r4h4alАй бұрын
So same as Richard but swap Christianity for Hinduism.
@willbrooks3490Ай бұрын
Ah. Like Richard who has FAITH in humans who are physicists but doesn't KNOW what they are talking about it seems that you too are taken in by 'scientists' who have NO HARD FACTS for where MATTER came from.
@BlackShadow2009Ай бұрын
He was referring to the question related to being afraid of islamic extremists attacking him physically. He doesn’t want that to be brought up for his security.
@gnagyusaАй бұрын
Creationists: DNA is so complex, it required an intelligent creator Also creationists: a billion times more complex super-intelligent mind can just exist forever for no f***-ing reason.
@summan41manАй бұрын
Perfectly rational explanation of operating within capacity
@doonesbury-u3hАй бұрын
Come on. Your trenchant attitude/statement is almost embarrassing. Try to educate yourself by watching "Mathematical Challenges To Darwin's Theory Of Evolution" Your simplistic 3 sentences show a puerile understanding of the complexity of life, time, and design. It's a complete misnomer to define the discussion as name tagged 'creationism'. Intelligent design is a carefully crafted phrase which suggests far more complexity than something as simple as Darwinian evolution. That is why Gelernter, Berlinski, (both brilliant atheists) and Stephen Myers (a Christian) are able to carry on an intelligent discussion. Scoffing has its place but should at least have some validity.
@PervySage723Ай бұрын
Exposing how dumb you are my man
@AwtsmoosАй бұрын
Lol the Creator is infinite simplicity
@AlexReynardАй бұрын
There are a lot of people whose arguments biol down to, 'I cannot personally imagine something this big, therefore it can't exist.'
@TheyThem_andMАй бұрын
I think im done with Piers. He is always after that gotcha moment, just let people talk.
@VandyvandyvandyvandyАй бұрын
Piers is not listening to Richard, and there are many moments where Dawkins provides a very reasonable and intellectual response for the inability to delve into before the “Big Bang Theory” due to the limitations of knowledge and understanding that a highly educated and experienced physicist might be able to explain. Also Piers’ original statement talking about how Dawkins fails to provide an explanation on what caused the “Big Bang” or what was the situation before the “Big Bang” as being unique to Dawkins’ stance on the theory of evolution and the universe, is utterly ignorant, because this applies to all theories of the universe and the evolution of life before and after the time of creation.
@andrewdouglas1963Ай бұрын
A highly educated and experienced physicist doesn't know what caused something to exist rather than nothing any more than his pet cat does.
@ampherneeАй бұрын
Richard should’ve just said “if you cannot explain the origin of god then god doesn’t exist.”
@andrewdouglas1963Ай бұрын
@@amphernee Why should Richard have said that?
@ampherneeАй бұрын
@@andrewdouglas1963 Peirs is saying that if Dawkins cannot answer what came before the Big Bang then he shouldn’t be an atheist because Piers has the answer and it’s god. If Piers cannot say how god came into existence then he should not believe in god by his own logic. If Piers insists on knowing how the universe began to be an atheist which is silly then he should be required to explain how god began in order to be a Catholic. While he’s at it he can explain things like the trinity in which three beings are one being simultaneously but at the same time completely distinct from one another.
@weeb3856Ай бұрын
This actually hurts to watch. What a fine gentleman Dawkins is. The contrast makes him shine evermore brightly in his articulation and manner. Bravo
@Dean-ic9wnАй бұрын
Piers is out of his depth
@kendallrogers4723Ай бұрын
My goodness Piers, seems like you really dropped the ball on this interview
@suzimonkey345Ай бұрын
“Everyone has got their view about how life started…” The moment that Richard Dawkins dropped his brain to, “School Visit”, from “Interview with adult”!
@davidsheriff9274Ай бұрын
And when Piers started to challenge what Dawkins was saying by claiming it goes against " common sense"think about how ignorant that is, what the heck does common sense have to do with science? This is a study in the Dunning Kruger effect.
@brockpinnington9014Ай бұрын
I can't stand this conversation. Piers nitpicking over a poetic title in Richard's book was so incredibly cringe, it was terribly bitter of Piers. Please Richard, don't give this ignorant and rude man another second of your time. You have much better, more thought provoking and respectful conversations elsewhere.
@AlexReynardАй бұрын
'Look, Piers, we have a nice, tidy, airtight logical hypothesis that nothing existed before the big bang, but that everything all came into existence all at once.' 'Anyone who hears that knows it's insane. It's the emperor with no clothes. You're describing a miracle.' 'No, YOU'RE the one who believes in miracles.' 'If you're insisting one happened, then why wouldn't there be more?'
@MoldylocksАй бұрын
Because it's not a miracle in the sense that anything supernatural happened.. so they are not the same... How hard is it to understand?
@yuppieyup8188Ай бұрын
@Moldylocks so if it was natural how come we can't reproduce it?
@robtheanimator1356Ай бұрын
Because of something known as Occam's Razor. It makes more sense to accept just one miracle (however you want to define that, but let's say a miracle is a super extraordinary event) than more than one.
@yuppieyup8188Ай бұрын
@@robtheanimator1356 lol potaato potato
@AlexReynardАй бұрын
@@yuppieyup8188 Just a thought, but let's maybe not try to recreate the big bang? I feel like that might erase rather a lot of stuff.
@jasoncompton1625Ай бұрын
For those who are interested, I encourage you to watch debates between Dawkins and John Lennox. He is an Oxford Mathematician and believes in God. There is no intelligence argument to diminish the argument as used here. It’s truly fascinating.
@AlexShiroАй бұрын
Lennox is sharp.
@Joshua-dc4unАй бұрын
Lennox rambles and doesn't engage with the argument
@jasoncompton1625Ай бұрын
@@Joshua-dc4un Your lack of understanding Lennox argument doesn’t constitute he rambles, as you put it.
@jobearesto9746Ай бұрын
When Piers Morgan asked Richard about what he would do on his last day a part of me wanted him to say something like 'H00kers and co-Kane' instead of refusing to say
@lotteliselotteАй бұрын
Lol😂
@MoldylocksАй бұрын
100%
@tamilllaАй бұрын
😂
@bluelab5019Ай бұрын
I guarantee Richard hasn't changed his mind that Morgan is a fool on the basis of this latest interview. If anything it's re-enforced his opinion.
@Rocknrolldaddy81-xy8urАй бұрын
He should have asked him if Cultural Christian’s bare some responsibility for the downfall of the culture of Christianity?
@DaveSmythАй бұрын
I get you're a biologist but just let me ask this question about physics...
@Sunil-wi4ywАй бұрын
In the beginning was The Word and The Word was with God and The Word was God!
@allahmuhammad225Ай бұрын
And that God is Zeus
@ezekiel1999Ай бұрын
@@allahmuhammad225 No! It's Gandalf!
@mbazuvahandura6543Ай бұрын
Or my grandma
@adamwright4135Ай бұрын
Those words were written by literate apes more than 13 billion years after the birth of the universe, so you're a little off when calling this the beginning
@BabadookJesus2 күн бұрын
“Rather you than me” is perhaps the best response I’ve witnessed this year.
@MrGMawson2438Ай бұрын
25:53 I can never remember Christopher Hitchens saying anything like that Piers
@DanielDennett-l9nАй бұрын
He actually said the exact reverse
@BarbaraMarkАй бұрын
@@DanielDennett-l9n To him the afterlife was North Korea
@applescause3021Ай бұрын
He never did. It's actually why he would often call himself an anti-theist. One interesting, perhaps "contradictory" thing he did say though, was that he wouldn't rid the world religion if he could. Specifically that if he had converted everybody except one person, he wouldn't convert that last person. Dawkins couldn't understand his reasoning behind that, and Hitchens himself said he couldn't explain it either.
@LittleMAC78Ай бұрын
@@BarbaraMark yea, I think the quote was something like (from memory) "A celestial North Korea".
@glenbaker8412Ай бұрын
Exactly. He said “I’m glad it’s not true”. If only Hitchens was here now to tear shreds off Morgan
@asamoahemmanuel4632Ай бұрын
Yet no evolutionist can mention any of the evolution theories observed, repeated or tested. That, will be science at work!
@Theo_SkeptomaiАй бұрын
There is only ONE Theory of Evolution. Do you agree? Yes or no.
@OG_johnsmithАй бұрын
@@Theo_SkeptomaiNot everyone is a neo darwinist, brother. The theory has been reworked numerous times throughout the last 100+ years
@Theo_SkeptomaiАй бұрын
@OG_johnsmith I didn't state such. Name me ANOTHER Scientific Theory for biological evolution OTHER than Speciation by Means of Natural Selection. Or STFU.
@Theo_SkeptomaiАй бұрын
@@OG_johnsmith test5
@DorkSideoftheMoonАй бұрын
Piers simply can’t accept that there are answers too big for him to wrap his head around without adding unnecessary factors to soften the blow for his lack of comprehension.
@StumpysTreeStumpRemovals-zo5lj18 күн бұрын
17 minutes 9 seconds in, he claims that he knows that the universe is 13.8 billion years old…whereas Billy Meier claims that it’s actually 47 Trillion years old. Big difference to what our scientists believe. But I suppose science is always correcting itself, like when we make new discoveries which become facts of the truth. Check out Billy Meier’s information on the universe.
@Batters5614 күн бұрын
It’s definitely older than a few thousands years though!
@rottweilerfun9520Ай бұрын
Piers can't get through his thick head that the origin of the universe and the origin of life are two completely different things.
@TheGreatTakeАй бұрын
I miss Christopher Eric Hitchens! Piers could do with a good Hitch 👋
@chriscrawl3732Ай бұрын
God was tired of his mocking... now he's a believer.
@rafaelallenblockАй бұрын
People don't gravitate toward religion to explain the origin of the universe, they do it to rationalize their personal bigotry.
@andredp33755 күн бұрын
The first half was super amusing. Definitely not intended as a serious interview more like poking an intellectual to evoke reactions for frivolous entertainment value. Loved it 🥰
@hollykilpatrick38Ай бұрын
Dawkins was amazingly evasive and contradictory. I am so surprised to see so many comments dissing Piers Morgan. I certainly didn't scroll all 8000 comments. But it is obvious that few listeners are believers.
@TerryMcNulty-q5dАй бұрын
There’s a physicist somewhere who is Mr. Dawkins’s sky daddy.
@jeenius9664Ай бұрын
That's Carl Sagan, the one and only God.
@Baggerz182Ай бұрын
repent to God
@CelticSpiritsCovenАй бұрын
@@jeenius9664 Exactly how do you know that 4.6 million years ago, somehow MAGICALLY a self-replicating molecule arose? How did this happen. Show us the chemistry.
@ungarrАй бұрын
@@Baggerz182Rapunzel let down your hair Any fairytale will do
@TerryMcNulty-q5dАй бұрын
@@Baggerz182 Everyone’s a critic.
@JohnathanMackenzie-h8zАй бұрын
"..we dont understand anything." The most pertinent thing dawkins has said ever.
@jezcorrigan651Ай бұрын
Whereas Religion says they understand “everything”. Apart from planets, galaxies, gravity, dinosaurs, evolution, genetics, germs … an endless list of discoveries post your “holy books” written by those who knew less about the world than the average western 5 year old I know who I’d rather put my “faith” in
@dank2804Ай бұрын
That's the kind of humility i can get behind. Not that false religious "I question my faith every day" humility, that gets people killed. Self-righteousness is the real curse of human existence and religious people are very susceptible to its influence.
@deviouskris3012Ай бұрын
It takes more honesty to say ‘I don’t know’. Than it does to invent a simplistic answer to satisfy your inability to deal with the unknown
@grayhalf1854Ай бұрын
He's right. And if you think that your particular religion fills in the gaps of our scientific understanding, you're deluded.
@stewystewymc3929Ай бұрын
he's correct. He doesn't have an issue admitting that we don't and probably will never have answers to everything unlike theists who cling on to a made up answer given in some ancient fable
@JIMMYLINEАй бұрын
Dawkins is very contradictory. He says there was no “before” the beginning of everything, because physics is very complex-more complex than a human brain can understand-but that complexity is definitely not God. So, how does Dawkins know that it’s not God if he admits it is something humans can never understand (I.e. a “mystery?).
@kmbewe111 күн бұрын
He is a fool am convinced. Why? the evidence for God is hiding all around in plain sight. Look at the fine tuning of the planets. 5% near the sun were are roasted, 5% away we freeze. He is a foolish old man. He needs help.
@strongwomanswanson6711Ай бұрын
The universe has no obligation, making sense to Piers Morgan.
@konstantinkrastev4478Ай бұрын
Boiling water freezes instantly compared to mild water, makes no sense right? well that's how it works
@strongwomanswanson6711Ай бұрын
@@konstantinkrastev4478 of course it makes sense! Fast moving particles get instantly shocked like a car that moves with 200 mph and crashes into a wall stops faster than a car with 30 mph crashing into the same wall. Its all about perspective.
@AwtsmoosАй бұрын
You made a typo: Richard Dawkins
@justthebeginning.Ай бұрын
How can someone who’s meant to be intelligent say that what he’s interested in is the mystery and profound things of life……. Erm! I fit wardrobes for a living and I can tell you that what he speaks of, is GOD 🤦♂️ Deeply deeply profound, mysterious! Oh dear! Best open yours eyes Richard. Your gunna meet him one day, be sure of that.
@alfredoparadike4106Ай бұрын
Do you even have a functioning brain?
@sardendibsАй бұрын
Any empirical evidence?
@synnical77Ай бұрын
Well, you fit wardrobes for a living... And no, what he speaks of is WhizzleWozzleDroopyDrip: The magic but mentally challenged spider that weaves universes together with space webs.
@justthebeginning.Ай бұрын
@@sardendibsPlenty of evidence out if you care to look which I employ you to do 👍
@justthebeginning.Ай бұрын
@@synnical77You obviously think you’re a cut above the rest, so what do you believe?
@demetristheocharis617Ай бұрын
I like Piers, but anything scientific makes him sound silly and irrelevant!
@davidfellows1650Ай бұрын
He's a phone hacker, by trade.
@JohnMawandooАй бұрын
I mean it is a good question, I think it just annoys many atheists because the have no answer. To have a position you must be able to explain its implications
@6:55 ...... Time, as we commonly perceive it, is a construct tied to human experience. The concept of “before” depends on this linear perception of time, which doesn’t exist in an absolute sense but rather as a way our minds organize events. Asking someone about their favorite flavor before they were born is nonsensical because it assumes a linear progression of moments that isn’t universally applicable. Moments aren’t confined to isolated instances; they coexist continuously, even if we can’t perceive them that way.
@jackforseti224Ай бұрын
your explanation is clearer than what Dawkins says
@laze4534Ай бұрын
You don't think there's a perceived time as well as a physical time?
@Ben-MurderinАй бұрын
Saying something was or happened "before" creation is totally logical. Time as we understand it, started at the moment of creation, but it is totally logical to say something was "before" that.
@briansmith3791Ай бұрын
@@Ben-Murderin " The Big Bang did not come from Nothing, it came from a highly, highly ordered state of incredibly complex geometry, 1^10^10^124. This is an observable fact".- Roger Penrose ( BBC Hardtalk).
@rbo7Ай бұрын
@@Ben-Murderin No. Before and after are dependent on time. It's like a movie. There is no before the movie. To use another example, where were you before you born? Nowhere. There is no such thing as a you before you were born.
@amanmustlearnАй бұрын
I enjoy this conversation and love how both sides are having an actual discussion without attacking each other
@greglyons2526Ай бұрын
Oh stop virtue signalling
@OBGynKenobiАй бұрын
All the precursors for proteins and nucleic acids have been found in space, on asteroids and comets. It's not totally unknown.
@ibrax1Ай бұрын
There is a relatively large minimal gene set that needs to exist for an organism to self-replicate successfully, and you cannot evolve from no gene set, to a relatively large gene set. Stop hiding from reality.
@patrickthomas2119Ай бұрын
but nothing is know of how they those precursors were put together in a functional way. The more we learn the more it exposes complexity.
@nickcorne6407Ай бұрын
James tour
@abdirisaqjacda9305Ай бұрын
Lei precursors of protein are amino acids Amino acids are only made by fully functioning DNA inside complete cell with all its machinery nothing can exist before the other Which means cell nucleus DNA cell membrane and those proteins coexisted the same time
@OBGynKenobiАй бұрын
@@patrickthomas2119 it wasn't "put there." The universe is a veritable soup of all sorts of ingredients for forming whatever the phenomenology of the universe can gather and generate through natural processes over billions and billions of years. Do you know the vastness and depth of what just 1 billion years is?