Why did the Arabs revolt against the Ottoman Empire? DOCUMENTARY

Рет қаралды 743,017

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 4 000

@KingsandGenerals 2 жыл бұрын

Play Supremacy1914 for FREE on PC, Android, and iOS and receive an amazing starter pack, only available for the next 30 days! s1914.onelink.me/TX2k/KingsAndGeneralsDecember

@TheEDFLegacy 2 жыл бұрын

Are these animations a new addition to your channel? Either way, they're top notch! Reminds me a _lot_ of Relic Entertainment's animation methodology from Homeworld.

@christhomson8924 2 жыл бұрын

MORE OTTOMAN VIDEOS PLEASE ❤❤❤❤

@AppleCinnamonPie 2 жыл бұрын

The "revolt" did not reach Syria. The majority of Syrians fought for the Ottomans, despite their oppression. The Levant was conquered mainly by British troops, and Damascus itself was conquered by Australian troops. Syrians did not accept this random, unknown bedouin named Feisal son of Hussein as their king.

@finalprophet813 2 жыл бұрын

@@AppleCinnamonPie I can tell you there were Sunni Lebanese clans in the northern mountains of Lebanon who had tension and on an off fights for decades before the Arab revolt.

@AppleCinnamonPie 2 жыл бұрын

@@finalprophet813 I'm sure there were. But again, the *vast* majority of Arabs fought for the Ottomans. We can't even say that Lebanese participated in the revolt because it was only a tiny fraction of them.

@thanhhoangnguyen4754 2 жыл бұрын

@@finalprophet813 Well Lebanese fighting for against the Ottoman Empire probably thinking that it will help them to get the British Empire to kick the Catholic Christian or the Greek one out and favor them. Either way whatever the outcome. It will end up the same a total chaos for Lebanon. That region was alway a hot mess before the dismantle of the Ottoman Empire. Like Israel and Palestine years latter.

@doyouwantthetotalwar 2 жыл бұрын

Contrary to the misconceptions, Ottomans didn't see themselves as solely inheritors of Persians or Romans or even inheritors of Turkic culture. They saw themselves as Ottomans, first and foremost, not only the legit heirs of both Persian, Byzantine(Roman) and Turkic cultures, but legit overlords of them all. Hence they used the titles Sultan, Khan and Kayser all at the same time.

@yousuf6382 2 жыл бұрын

....

@yousuf6382 2 жыл бұрын

The names of the Ottomans are Arabic or Persian?? Muhammad and Abdul Hamid or Zardasht and Khosrau? The religion of the Ottomans is Islam or Zoroastrianism?? The Ottomans alphabet is Arabic or Persian?? The caliphate is the caliphate of Omar or Khosrau?? In Hagia Sophia, the names of Muhammad, Abu Bakr, Omar, Othman, Ali, or Zardasht, Khosrau, and Cyrus? Ottomans perform their prayers in Arabic or Persian? The Kabah is there a place where Ottomans faces it's direction every day five time in Arabia or in persia ??

@yousuf6382 2 жыл бұрын

.....

@doyouwantthetotalwar 2 жыл бұрын

@@yousuf6382 What are you talking about? Got a reading problem or cognitive issues?

@doyouwantthetotalwar 2 жыл бұрын

@Kokoliko Loco those "uncivilised Turks" made your late ancestors their colonial chatel for half a millenium tho. At what scale of civilization that bitter fact puts you in I wonder.

@jaorlowski 2 жыл бұрын

I wonder how many understand the "Yes Minister" reference. I for my part welcome it very much as it has been a great show that taught me a lot about politics and processes/language.

@frederickvonabel6349 2 жыл бұрын

Truly a masterpiece of political comedy.

@rosiehawtrey 2 жыл бұрын

Ah, Sir Humphrey on the EU..

@joshuawells835 2 жыл бұрын

I liked that show. Anyone know where to find the 2013 remake?

@AtillatheFun 2 жыл бұрын

@@joshuawells835 Hell

@kyrgyzsanjar 2 жыл бұрын

Link?

@2broketim479 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks!

@lioraselby5328 2 жыл бұрын

tim's 2 Broke but still gave $5 to K&G, mad respect right there

@crpse-qf6rh 2 жыл бұрын

@@lioraselby5328 Prefer knowledge to wealth, for the one is transitory, the other perpetual. - Socrates

@lioraselby5328 2 жыл бұрын

@@crpse-qf6rh well knowledge can be temporary too if you manage to get dementia or Alzheimer’s

@crpse-qf6rh 2 жыл бұрын

@@lioraselby5328 hopefully we get a cure for those diseases. i would rather die than lose my memories

@got80hd Жыл бұрын

@@crpse-qf6rh on the bright side after a while you won’t remember losing your memories

@lglstc13 Жыл бұрын

"Yemen Türküsü" is a folk song for Turkish soldiers from Anatolia who lost their lives in this war. It's quite a sad song.

@TS-zp7pe Жыл бұрын

Funny for the Arabs though

@lillegion3121 Жыл бұрын

@@TS-zp7pe yeah we got good lessons from arabs thank to israel they see resulst of they actions

@TS-zp7pe Жыл бұрын

@@lillegion3121 Turkey - the first Islamic country to recognize Israel. Turkey- the first Islamic country to allow gay marriage and vodka manufacturing. Shows who you are.

@بارود-ر5خ Жыл бұрын

راح انطرب عليها

@caesarean38 Жыл бұрын

my great grandfather went to Yemen all the way from our village in Kayseri, Turkiye during WW1 and was never heard of again

@Fummy007 Жыл бұрын

Britain (with a stick poking the Arabs) "c'mon... *poke* *poke* do a revolt"

@nourerrahmanebrahmia4035 2 жыл бұрын

As an Algerian I see this as a sad part in Islamic history Before sheriff Hussain, British tried to bribe Emir abd alkader so he can declare himself caliph of Arabs, he was Algerian figure who fought the french and was descended from the prophet cousin Ali, letters of allegiance started flowing to him but he refused and remained in Syria

@mmaer2003 2 жыл бұрын

@@Spartan-jg4bf It was colonized after all, by non-muslims, and became worse than ever. So this question doesn't make any sense.

@nourerrahmanebrahmia4035 2 жыл бұрын

@@Spartan-jg4bf it should have been done through diplomacy just like we broke away in 1671 while keeping our nominal vassal status while recognising the Ottoman as caliph of Islam similar to the Abbasid decline, however asking the Europeans for direct involvement was a big mistake made by our eastern brethren

@Omer1996E.C 2 жыл бұрын

@@Spartan-jg4bf "foreigners"?! There are no foreigners in Islam, just be a Good (in politics, military, economics, etc...) Muslim leader, and you can be Muslims' emir, sultan or imam. There is no "foreigner" in Islam. We are not nationalists, we are Muslims

@ibrahimmustafa2481 2 жыл бұрын

@@Omer1996E.C tell that to the Arabs man, they prefer pan arabism over religion, as if Arab culture can mean anything without Islam.

@theazraelreaper8533 2 жыл бұрын

LONG LİVE ALGERİA TURKİSH FRİENDSHİP ..

@Light_spot_ Жыл бұрын

Kings and Generals , congratulations for being the most accurate history source out there .I adore your work

@KingsandGenerals Жыл бұрын

Thank you!

@Light_spot_ Жыл бұрын

@@KingsandGenerals ❤

@deadpoolx2378 Жыл бұрын

@@KingsandGeneralsCan you make video about jourden victoryin 1968 and Arabs victory in 1973

@Vigilant69 Жыл бұрын

The British and French betrayal of the Arabs is rarely talked about nowadays. Most westerners have no idea about these things and only those that dive into these things start to understand the history.

@samizakariya5155 Жыл бұрын

@kızgın tosbağa they are complicit because their nation benefitted. But not all Muslims betrayed the ottomans only certain tribes who still hold power in certain regions. The ottomans was not perfect either. In 18 century they wanted to become western Europeans so bad , thats when they went downhill.

@Malet-Anatole Жыл бұрын

Right the british presented a little gift call "nationalism" and we know what came next. Next time just rinse it down the sewer.

@zhcultivator Жыл бұрын

"rarely talked about" okay....

@muhammaduzair2674 Жыл бұрын

@@samizakariya5155bruh i heard some arabs saying the banned a printing machine or something and now u r saying this. They wanted to make modern not western

@TruthSeeker8834 Жыл бұрын

@@muhammaduzair2674Nah,,Ottomans certainly wanted to become european so bad. How do u think they got the nickname of "Sick man of Europe". Like the guy before said both Ottomans and arabs share heavy amount of blame of this.

@imsyed5 Жыл бұрын

The reason I love your videos is you show the whole map Despite talking about one or two countries you always show how the world was back then Like how all of this was happening in Europe and West Asia but you also showed Great India under British Raj so people could understand what was happening there at this time around That's really great Because that's what confuses Me the most

@wintersking4290 2 жыл бұрын

Never knew about this. Learned about WW1 in school, but we were just taught that the Brits and French took that land from the Ottomans after the war during the peace treaty.

@wintersking4290 2 жыл бұрын

@@antoniosdimoulas3566 if you occupy something for longer than 50-60 years it's basically yours. And yes I am a giant history nerd and was aware of the medieval conquests that led to the ottoman supremacy over the middle east.

@ibrahimmustafa2481 2 жыл бұрын

@@antoniosdimoulas3566 The people of the region didn't consider the Ottomans occupiers until the 20th century because the Ottomans were a legitimate Muslim caliphate, the British and the French were NOT. Only when the ottomans started to adopt turkish nationalism instead of Islam as a state policy did the arabs rebelled. Please refrain from talking about subjects you CLEARLY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT.

@Ahmadbeik99 2 жыл бұрын

@@ibrahimmustafa2481 stop making things up pakistani guy, we never thought of them as legitamate caliphs they never prayed nor went to haj nor do zaka nor were we caring about a bash invasion

@thanhhoangnguyen4754 2 жыл бұрын

@@antoniosdimoulas3566 You definitely saying the other nation and what they doing is more justifying. As for human right. I matter little the power that rule them in those. If it not the Turk there will be other. Especially the age nationalism when human right is basically thrown out of the window for ethnicity. Never and i repeat never those time like since the medival time to discussing of a mordem era of 19th to 21th century. That the same reason why many suffer even when got them rid of the Turk. It alway blaming the Turk when other factor also tributed to it you inogred. I don't stand with the Turk. What you saying just like those nationalism that plunged the world into a world war all for their ideal of an old passing age. Which it already did, if it not the Turk doing the thing. It the other nation or people who claimed they doing it for their nation. And i am looking at the Balkan Country who even after getting rid of the Turk didn't satisfy and caused many more like them. Only this time they was the agression one instead of the Turk to those they consider not part of them or those still loyal to the Ottoman. Hypocrites all of them. Then again we are all human. What to expect.

@SaadBinAlamgir3345 2 жыл бұрын

@@antoniosdimoulas3566 Dog literally compared turks with a kuffar Country 😂😂 Faqqot muslims didn't had any nationalistic differences until 20th century when it was introduced here by white swines like you......

@AppleCinnamonPie 2 жыл бұрын

I just want to mention that this "Arab" revolt only concerned the bedouins of Sherif Hussein's tribe in the Hejaz. Very, very few Arabs from Syria, Palestine, Iraq, Nejd, Yemen, or other areas participated in this revolt, and it was considered "largely unsuccessful" by British authorities. In fact, the vast majority of Arabs fought _for_ the Ottomans, and even after the war, when Hussein's son Feisal was "crowned" king of Syria, the people largely did not accept him.

@yousuf6382 2 жыл бұрын

you are a liar !

@AppleCinnamonPie 2 жыл бұрын

@@yousuf6382 تكفير المسلم حرام

@yousuf6382 2 жыл бұрын

@@AppleCinnamonPie اعتذر تخلبطت في الردود .. لكن ما قلته غير صحيح بالمانسبة

@fab-freshaquaponicbiospher6335 Жыл бұрын

Everywhere we go.. We see it's sins 🇬🇧🇺🇲

@izzetkaanyuksel8940 Жыл бұрын

There were revolts in all the Arab cities, that's why the Ottoman Army retreated to Turkish areas very fast. They knew they could easier fight and defend the fatherland.

@TestTest-g2w Жыл бұрын

The effects of going against the Caliph can be seen till today.

@sumiahaltalhi4767 9 ай бұрын

Caliph?

@tatar1881 9 ай бұрын

@@sumiahaltalhi4767Turk’s are the Caliph, arabs betrayed our jihad call in ww1!

@ALHELAL-eu2ue 9 ай бұрын

not caliph

@hasinabegum1038 8 ай бұрын

What caliph?

@tengr6068 7 ай бұрын

Why caliph?

@عمرلويسي-ن1ز 5 күн бұрын

as an Arab, i am proud of the Big Arab Revolution, the Turks caused all of that by turning the empire into a Turkic Nationalist empire in 1908, they also took the Taxes for 400 years to build their places while leaving our lands the same. that's why the Caliph must be an Arab

@Ganaton2 2 жыл бұрын

This part of the Ottoman history feels like the crows feeding on the carcass of a dead Empire. As a Muslim, It really hurts 😞

@محمدالفدعاني-ط2ث 2 жыл бұрын

Long live Arabia

@arifahmedkhan9999 2 жыл бұрын

Ottomans were no longer a Muslim empire then. You delude yourself in lies. It was controlled by the Young turks and they were indulged in secularism and Taghuts. And the ottomans were also drowning in Bidah and Every Bidah is evil and every evil is gonna be in hellfire.

@abdussabur9535 2 жыл бұрын

@@محمدالفدعاني-ط2ث Under Jewish F 16.

@محمدالفدعاني-ط2ث 2 жыл бұрын

@@abdussabur9535 nope, Under al Saud and other Arabian Rule Family

@abdussabur9535 2 жыл бұрын

@@محمدالفدعاني-ط2ث Idiots.They are controlled by the Jews.Coversation with Mohammad Asad and Chaim Wiseman,Wiseman said in 1926 Arabs will not be majority here for too long.Jews wants Arabia and get Arabs killed. And you guys think Saud controls Arabs.Come on With some US bases inside how can someone have control. Are you kids Totally Indulged in Girls and Wines or Some sanity is left?

@jozzieokes3422 2 жыл бұрын

Quality content

@HaloJumper7 2 жыл бұрын

There are still sad Turkish songs about sending the poor Turks to die in Yemen while the rich just pay off the authorities. It was their Vietnam and the songs were their "Fortunate Son."

@houseplant1016 2 жыл бұрын

@@antoniosdimoulas3566 Why does every Greek person have to be this negative about the Ottoman empire? Greeks did worse things and similair things.

@HaloJumper7 2 жыл бұрын

@@antoniosdimoulas3566 Janissaries were elite just like the Mamlukes they became Pashas and committed massacres in Yemen. Özdemir Pasha raised Sana'a, killed 10,000 of the males and enslaved 10,000 of the females who were sent to be sold into slavery in Istanbul. The city surrendered peacefully but he was just looking for an excuse, and yes Muslim empires did enslave other Muslims and their armries also had non-Muslim fighters. Resource thirsty empires only want profit, just like modern-day imperialism, but on a miniature scale.

@NextGenerationUmmah 2 жыл бұрын

@@antoniosdimoulas3566 I’m a Greek Muslim and you should know that the ottomans were barbaric and had nothing to do with Islam. Look to the Quran and life of Muhammad ﷺ and the sahaba. These fake ottoman boys broke every rule of Islam. Drinking alcohol while raping Muslim and Christian women. Fully disgusting.

@joeydallas7351 2 жыл бұрын

@@antoniosdimoulas3566 An average jannisary had more rights and prosperity compared to a slave in the Roman army. Stop with the moral outcry of a system that last existed more than 250 years ago.

@ziyadamir8187 2 жыл бұрын

Is different conflict is not WW1 Turks attack yemen first don't confuse with modern day yemen because majority of yemen land never been under ottoman

@shlomomarkman6374 Жыл бұрын

There are some points that are missed. Regarding the bedouins, up until the ending decades of the 19th century they were essentially ungoverned and so untaxed. After the reforms the Ottomans decided to start governing them which meant imposition of heavy taxation and corrupt administrators. This alone had significantly contributed to their resentment. As the new governing infrastructure was based on the Hejaz railway it was especially hated. Regarding the rural Arabs in the Levant region, the reforms brought them almost nothing creating an extremely feudal society with absentee lanlords (who frequently were christians) owning entire towns while living in Beirut or Istanbul. The reforms strengthened the rich merchants who became said landlords. The levantine arabs didn't joined the revolt but were apathetic to both sides.

@sphalanz 24 күн бұрын

no. beduians were just inhabited barbarians whose attacks caravans rebels against governence in deserts of arabia. brits gave them guns and let them go wild. Idiots even thought that Turks' bellies were full of gold theyre hiding from them

@streetscholar3539 2 жыл бұрын

Thanks K&G for a very informative video on a subject I've never fully understood.

@shamimazad007 2 жыл бұрын

At the end divide and conquer by the British won.

@theanglo-lithuanian1768 2 жыл бұрын

The Ottomans were oppressing the Arabs. The Arabs had every right to stand up to the Ottomans, its just sad that the Europeans didn't hold on to their promise and only made part of it independent.

@sitarampradhan8488 Жыл бұрын

History tells Empire never last British Empire also didn't last. Now world is better place.

@axmeddahir6487 Жыл бұрын

@@sitarampradhan8488 its not for arabs know mate they are being bombed

@Zysuzuuauajz Жыл бұрын

Yep, and they got their israel, 40 years later than intended bc the great Atatürk, as winston churchill said but they still got it

@theanglo-lithuanian1768 Жыл бұрын

@@Zysuzuuauajz Not true, the main reason why the British supported the idea of the Jews getting their own home were the events of the Holocaust. Before the idea was not that popular in the UK. You can't prevent something that was never would of happened in the first place.

@Provision600 Жыл бұрын

Abu Musa al-Ashari reported: The Messenger of Allah ﷺ said, "You will never have faith until you love each other. Shall I tell you what will make you love each other?" They said, "Of course, O Messenger of Allah." The Prophet said, "Spread peace between yourselves. By the one in whose hand is my soul, you will not enter Paradise until you are merciful to others." They said, "O Messenger of Allah, all of us are merciful." The Prophet said, "Verily, it is not only mercy between yourselves, but rather it is mercy for everyone." Al-Sunan al-Kubrä lil-Nasâ'i 5760

@carlramirez6339 Жыл бұрын

When I went to Turkey in 2016, our tour guide blamed this all on the British, claiming that the Arabs loved being under Ottoman rule until Lawrence of Arabia manipulated them into backstabbing the Turks.

@Batuhanify 10 ай бұрын

Tour guides are not historians and, sadly, often study a single narrative to then relay to the tourists. Not to mention Turkish State has adopted a policy of 'washing their hands off everything' with, not really a revisionist, but omittal type of history. You'll see a lot of Turks being rather misinformed about their own history because of this consequently. Whilst good parts are told, even the neutral parts of the history are often omitted unless one takes the pains to research it. Studying Ottoman History in high school is funny because of this, since it is very.. frontloaded so to speak.

@ezpz9340 8 ай бұрын

Arabs didnt love anything about ottomans. Some of them however fought with ottomans, not because they liked them, but because they were against the british. The ottomans were horrible, backward and barbaric.

@mechaturk1977 4 ай бұрын

So tour guy was an arab worshipping erdogan supporter.

@unimpressivefilms 2 жыл бұрын

Great as always.

@JohnnyElRed 2 жыл бұрын

The loss of one is the gain of many, I guess. A lot of people internally and externally seemed to want a piece of the Ottomans at that moment.

@kasadam85 2 жыл бұрын

Absence of the Ottomans in middle east is still more preferable to those that haven't seen the horrors of war

@sadettinarslan5324 2 жыл бұрын

a grave mistake committed by allies. very grave.

@kayagurcu2814 2 жыл бұрын

Totally true. I can give two examples approving your comment: 1) balkans 2) middle east

@Ahmadbeik99 2 жыл бұрын

@@kayagurcu2814 they are healing their wounds from you, the problems caused lkke mass deportations and demographic changes after all the massacres lead to modern suffering, in short we dont want your ottomans back

@abdullahiqaasim7120 Жыл бұрын

Noy a mistake from the allies but mistkae of the last rulers of the ottomans tanzimat , young turks and all tgese seculars and nationalist. İf you start nationalism why every one will start nationalism.

@TheBassil1991 2 жыл бұрын

The maker of this video forgot to mention other factors for the Arab revolt against the Ottoman Empire which is the forced conscription of young Arab men during the balkan wars and WW1 and the high death rate of Arab soldiers during that time as what is known as “safer barlek” and also the famine that hit Syria and Lebanon during WW1 that caused the death of hundreds of thousands of people during that period Another factor was the cruel policies and ruling of Turkish governors of Arab provinces which alienated the Arab population from the central government in Istanbul

@metesever6546 Жыл бұрын

Because there is no such thing as using arab soldiers in west of the empire, u are blowing info out of ur a$s. It is a logistic nightmare.. When we saw today's arabs we understood ottos had pretty good job with Middle East.

@coolbanana750 Жыл бұрын

Loved the Yes Minister reference best sitcom ever too bad the remake was lackluster

@alfapaul5593 Жыл бұрын

Their revolt should be blamed for what is happening to the Palestinians people today.

@Yoo-yooYeshua 11 ай бұрын

Yes that is why this is happening, their kin should have never rebelled! All they had to do was bend knees, pay taxes, and breed camels 🐫

@FOREVERLOST-k1 10 ай бұрын

@@Yoo-yooYeshuaJEW

@ahmedbabiker6562 Ай бұрын

Should be blamed for pan-turk and all the massacred you did

@wadisindhda7713 2 жыл бұрын

Its inaccurate to say that the Arabs revolted, rather it was just specific groups and factions from among Arabs that had revolted. Arabs were not ideologically or politically homogenous, in fact, there were far more pro-Ottoman Arabs. These pro-Ottoman militia groups, despite being more numerous than the Hashemite rebels were isolated and lacked support from the Ottomans and were thus able to be picked off slowly.

@r0__.0 Жыл бұрын

Who are you to speak in our name? We all in the Arabian Peninsula hate the Turks and the Ottomans, and we will not accept that a Turkish slave rules us.

@موسى_7 Жыл бұрын

@@hamdiamairi4340 In Syrian dramas, all the commoners hate the Ottomans.

@metesever6546 Жыл бұрын

@@hamdiamairi4340 We saw Today's Syria.. ottos got pretty handy ruling levant if u ask anyone with in right mind..

@alioshax7797 Жыл бұрын

@@hamdiamairi4340 I mean, your grandmother's words are an interesting testimony, but she's not "all the commoners". As always, there are no political opinion shared by everyone. Most likely, the average commoner wouldn't care much about who rules them for 5000 km away.

@ulkucu3492 Жыл бұрын

@@hamdiamairi4340 Were Syria in Turkish rule today, Syria would not be in the state it is.

@kurtsell8376 Жыл бұрын

From what i heard the Arabs were revolting against the Ottomans quite often, meaning they probably saw WW1 as an ideal time when the Ottoman armies were distracted fighting entente forces.

@TruthSeeker8834 Жыл бұрын

It’s complicated. Arabs especially in the region of nejed revolted against the Ottomans frequently. Current Saud family is the royal family from the nejed region.

@emanalmrogi8103 11 ай бұрын

@@TruthSeeker8834We Arabs hated the Turks and revolted against them many times. Rightfully so, they've not place in Arabian peninsula.

@TruthSeeker8834 11 ай бұрын

@@emanalmrogi8103 Not always. P.S: u arabs show great arrogance cause of ur oil( not all but many). Remember oil reserve will end one day but ur deeds will remain forever.

@abofadi8389 Жыл бұрын

as arabian i can say most of our afoul economic and political state is due to our fault acts in intifadaat (revaluations) and we alwayswant to change the government's without changing our mindsets .

@emperornapoleon6204 2 жыл бұрын

Another remarkable piece. I look forward to more in 2023. Happy New Year!

@tomasmunkils7287 2 жыл бұрын

Nice topic and great content as always keep rising K and G 👐.......in the future could we get a how ottomans administered the empire video?

@y.a9162 Жыл бұрын

I hope u read this, u never dissapoint us with ur content. I am 100% sure that I would never find better videos covering Muslim/Arab history with such details. Well done!

@KingsandGenerals Жыл бұрын

Thanks for watching! There is always room to improvement, but we'll do our best.

@201120555 Жыл бұрын

You are wrong, the map that the video depends on is not true

@theunbeatable6598 Жыл бұрын

Yeah most of the videos are somehow borderline xenophobic while K&G are actually non biased.

@aeonicfx5254 Жыл бұрын

Yes bro i love this channel for this. I like that he doesn't just cover European history and actually branches off to alot of other parts of the world unlike so many history channels

@classicmoviez3909 Жыл бұрын

Turning point in the middle east. This gave British complete control of the middle east and eventually they established the state of israel. arabs shot themselves in the foot.

@analyzeit4682 Жыл бұрын

Nope we didn’t, Turks were slaughtering us and segregating us. They wanted to make an ethno-religious state, which made no sense cause Muslims in Turkey were much more liberal than Muslims in the rest of the Ottoman Empire. And by the time the Arabs revolted Turks were barely even Muslim, Ataturk came and took away Islam from state religion and took away Sharia. It no longer made sense to stay one nation, we didn’t have the same idealogies. Ottoman Caliphate was only a Caliphate by name.

@You-zo3in Жыл бұрын

@@analyzeit4682 look the Ottoman ministers wanted their state to be all Turkish

@ruel1983 4 ай бұрын

Most of the jewish settlements were built under the ottoman’s. Under the british mandate, almost none. Even Tel Aviv was founded under ottoman’s

@timurjack8773 2 ай бұрын

True, British tricked them.

@yolakin8210 Жыл бұрын

It didn’t end up how the Arabs wanted and the results are still being felt today.

@ytpp1632 Жыл бұрын

Arabs revolted because they prefered to be cucks on their women to the Crusaders (British and France) rather than being brothers to the Muslim Ottomans. They have been cucks since then and they have been enjoying it so much.

@timurjack8773 2 ай бұрын

I agree, British tricked them.

@Irfan87 2 жыл бұрын

Having the Brits in your ear certainly help push forward the rebellion.

@Kevc00 2 жыл бұрын

It more tipped it over the edge since they had military support for the revolt. There were already major Arab nationalist groups operating in the empire at the time.

@theanglo-lithuanian1768 2 жыл бұрын

Also having the Ottomans opress your way of life for centuries helps too.

@Omer1996E.C 2 жыл бұрын

@@theanglo-lithuanian1768 lol, as if the bits helped us to advance in anyway, other than in destruction

@sev8538 2 жыл бұрын

@@theanglo-lithuanian1768The half british guy is telling me about opressing lmao

@theanglo-lithuanian1768 2 жыл бұрын

@@sev8538 Nice whataboutism. Like it or not, the Ottomans oppressed the Arabs (As explained in the video) and they rebelled. Simple. Wow. Its almost like more then one Empire can oppress people!

@ici70yz49 Жыл бұрын

It is the world war 1 , Turkey and Germany were fighting against the British and the only way to weaken the alliance is to destroy the Turks by orchestrating the revolt, and eventually the Ottoman empire was dismantled .

@Darondaring Жыл бұрын

As a person who comes from a Greek family from Jeddah, I appreciate the video

@barittos5585 Жыл бұрын

huh ?

@sagapoetic8990 Жыл бұрын

Were your family present there from Ottoman times? I think Jeddah was the site of an Ottoman fort previously?

@محمدشويل-ت3ل Жыл бұрын

@@sagapoetic8990 Jeddah is one of the oldest cities in the world, and the meaning of Jeddah in the Arabic language is the grandmother

@Darondaring Жыл бұрын

@@sagapoetic8990 Yes, they were many forts in Hejaz, but Jeddah didn’t have one. The city had walls tho

@albaraqahtani Жыл бұрын

ايش اسمك بالله ؟

@joshuafrimpong244 2 жыл бұрын

you make some of the most accurate historical maps can I know where to find them

@aj3013 Жыл бұрын

That wasn’t an accurate map highlighting Najed as a Whabbism is a bigoted stereotype a historian should not fall for these things

@joshuafrimpong244 Жыл бұрын

@@aj3013 *Najd and the religion would have been wahhabist as it was founded before the state existed

@aj3013 Жыл бұрын

@@joshuafrimpong244 there is no such thing as whabbist saudis have always stated they hate this stereotype because its has always been islam calling it whabbits because Mohammed bin AbdulWAHAB was an influcing scholar is offensive af

@joshuafrimpong244 Жыл бұрын

@@aj3013 oh, that's what you are talking about

@joshuafrimpong244 Жыл бұрын

@@aj3013 yh, that is correct

@faisal175 2 жыл бұрын

In short, we can summarize the causes of unnecessary tension between Turks and Arabs as following: - The too much expansion of any state will lead to economic, social and political issues. - The basic cause for establishing Ottoman Empire was "Jihad", which was necessary to defend the land against the Crusades and to block them. Once the Ottomans forgot that, the trobles with Arabs (among other Islamic nations) began. - Accepting Nationalism was like taking a virus to conceal weakness of both Turks and Arabs. Both of them couldn't bring on all their material and cultural resources to face industrial and military power of the West. Eventually, the Nationalism virus destroyed both of them.

@thanhhoangnguyen4754 2 жыл бұрын

Nothing new in those era. Nationalism was already a virus to those in the West. Jusk the Austrian Hungry Empire and the Russian Empire. Well at least the Russian Empire did a better job than the Ottoman Empire by suppressing every," every" nationalism intend against the Tsar authoritarian rule. Especially the rebellious Pole =)).

@faisal175 Жыл бұрын

@kızgın tosbağa Where is this "freedom" you're talking about? Arabs are now living under rule uglier than Ottoman's. Since 1922 and the case is getting worse, and the British and French knew that Arabs and Turks can somehow regain peace and understanding between each other to reform their state, so they decided to destroy Ottoman empire. The West brilliantly managed to create a new situation to make Arabs think they finally got their independence and freedom, while obviously the truth is so far from that. It was better to stay under the Ottoman rule (because it was at least legitimate!) than to face regimes controlled ultimately by the West and Capitalism.

@batuhanyayla7214 Жыл бұрын

@kızgın tosbağa genede arap topraklarında ki insan gücünü ve kaynakları kaybettik ama tabi istikrar konusunda artışada sebeb oldu

@pczone7641 Жыл бұрын

@kızgın tosbağa the one who revolt were not Syrians or Palestinians or Iraqis lmao!! it was the peninsula Arabs whom today have a much much more stable society / economy much safer countries , better valued passports than than yours , in fact i've seen turks workk in saudi and UAE and qatar as barbers and labor works how is that a bad of deal tho?? 🤣 it seems to me the the arab revolt served them good

@pczone7641 Жыл бұрын

@kızgın tosbağa can you actually read English ? the Arabs whom had the revolt against the Ottoman empire are the Arabian peninsula arabs like saudis not syrians and other levantine arabs of course the Arabian peninsula arabs like Saudis and Emiratis and Qataris have a better life than you , even their passports grant them entry to almost anywhere unlike yours, it's good they revolted against the ottoman and ruled their own land.

@699CHIP 2 жыл бұрын

At 13:20 the letter is written from right to left. A very nice detail

@kazmaitalia8796 Жыл бұрын

Why aren’t these Arabs that rebelled against the Ottoman Khilafate considered Khwaraji?

@jouglulahmed3410 Жыл бұрын

Being a long time viewer of this Rich channel, I think this bit was not enough to portray the full picture of the Arab Revolt. I think you should consider making a series about the downfall of Ottomans in the Arabia connecting them to the events from crimean war to the great war and other muslim perspectives like in Indian subcontinent. You may consider discussing the religious perspective too. You could even collaborate with Al-Muqaddimah too as he seems to be an expert on this topic. That'd be worthy of a watch. Keep up the good work. Kudos.

@mertnecati875 Жыл бұрын

1- There is literally a museum for the house of British spy Lawrence in Arabia. He is honored and seen as a hero by Saudis. So I think knowing that already clears up many things on this case. 2- There is literally a Hilton Hotel upon the graveyard of first caliph of Islam 3- First wahabi revolts occurred during rule of Mahmud II (first reformist Ottoman sultan) and wahabis sacked the tomb of prophet's relatives. All of them were repaired by Turks. 4- A person from west interested in that case must learn the difference between Turkish way of Islam and Wahhabi fundamentalism. Even during under the most conservative and islamic sultan of Ottoman Empire Turks have never came in terms with Gulf Arabian way of islam which is incredibly backwards and purist. Most of Arabs (except Lebanon Iraq and Syria) anyway never accepted the caliphate of Ottomans since Selim conquered Egypt and Arab lands. 5- Arab Revolts were a reaction to Turkish nationalism in regions like Lebanon and parts of Syria however it was nothing but a British backed division plan when you look at southern parts. The amount of gold given to Saudi warlords by British during these years is beyond belief. All was to control them. Arabs were promised a large Arabia reaching to southeast of Turkey but of course they had to sit and accept what their bosses offer them while giving all rights to British to obtain their oil sources. How heroic right? 6- All in all as a Turk I am extremely happy that we could cut our ties with this part of the world and we could differentiate ourselves from them by any means.

@nartali9683 Жыл бұрын

whabies are way more closer to the traditions of islam than you. the reason why wahabies have demolished those graves is that many people were venerating the graves and even in some cases worshiping them which is strictly prohibited by the prophet himself.

@azizbey4334 Жыл бұрын

You can always rely on a turk to lie

@blueyy9117 Жыл бұрын

turks try to figure out the difference between the saudis and the hashemites challenge (impossible)

@mertnecati875 Жыл бұрын

@@blueyy9117 like any single person cares. You live under dynasties, even your police officers are selected from a family. And the ones ruling Arabia right now were the ones shook hands with British.

@momomo5936 Жыл бұрын

@@Gülden-w1i why are the turks not fighting and protecting the uyguhrs? are they not ur brothers and sisters? why the turks not fighting for them? did u forget they also a part from the turks?

@hdvallejoa Жыл бұрын

and that's a very well told story on how traitors would regret such moves forever....

@JC-mx9su 2 жыл бұрын

Happy New year Kings and Generals, I hope you enjoy a wonderful year for new videos on History.

@justsefa1843 2 жыл бұрын

The Ottomans were a multi-ethnical, multi-religious, multi-ideological Empire wiith everyone wanting their own state with their own ideology and their own doctrine. Not hard to figure out, why things didn't work out, regardless of which direction the young turks could have taken.

@thanhhoangnguyen4754 2 жыл бұрын

I am betting they didn't saw the the Austrian Hungry situation or they just looking at Germany for their model. Austrian , Russian and Ottoman literally the all in the same case yet rather than fixing in the internal one they rather fought each over another ethinic piece of land.

@justsefa1843 2 жыл бұрын

@@thanhhoangnguyen4754 there was no fixing to it. It was the age of nationalism.

@thanhhoangnguyen4754 2 жыл бұрын

@@justsefa1843 Yeah that why i felt poor for those multi ethnic Empire like Austria Russia and Ottoman. They literally a powder keg. And of course the first world war have to be caused by nationalism.

@ezpz9340 8 ай бұрын

Ottoman empire were a "succesor" of the islamic empire. Compare it to Holy roman empire, claiming they are succesors to the ancient romans. So of course its diverse, but they were horrible.

@ArabianQuirkSA Жыл бұрын

why didn't you mention the tons of massacres in Nejd, Saudi Arabia?

@JohnDove-d8d 4 ай бұрын

By the Ottomans.

@tabularasa_br 2 ай бұрын

Kings and Generals and Cogito are my comfort channels: should I want to relax and enjoy some of the best content available on KZbin, they're the safest bet!

@KingsandGenerals 2 ай бұрын

Thanks!

@Jackjonjon09 2 жыл бұрын

As a Turkish-Kurdish That's why Turks don't like Arabs even today. Although this is not pleasant, but they do not never forget this betrayal. If the Ottomans were standing today, there would not have been so many wars in Muslim countries.

@turkishemir5735 2 жыл бұрын

As a half kurd/turk the turkish side is also to blame for this revolt.

@ziyadamir8187 2 жыл бұрын

Keep crying do you see the video that there is arab tribe who side with ottoman

@TheIraqiforce Жыл бұрын

I disagree with this. As an Iraqi our country was under constant ottoman campiagns and forced looting of towns and cities when ottoman armies were not paid. We all in iraq look at the time of ottomans as oppressive and unstable while british rule allowed country to organise we don't care if we didn't have full independance but people were better off

@ziyadamir8187 Жыл бұрын

@@TheIraqiforce not all Iraq is under Ottoman South Iraq is Independence under tayy tribe Also Iraq is a new country

@محمدشويل-ت3ل Жыл бұрын

Now I know why the Kurds do not have a state. Do you want us to be like you? The Kurdish places are poor and the Turkish side is rich and there is no recognition of the Kurdish language until late.

@barryboushehri1707 2 жыл бұрын

Informative video. Please do the Sassanid/ Roman wars of 602-628 AD. No channel has the graphic and the narrator voice as K&G.🙏

@kevinyonan2147 2 жыл бұрын

They already covered that I think.

@Shahanshah.Shahin 2 жыл бұрын

@@kevinyonan2147 They're outdated and too old so yep K&G will consider releasing them with better graphics and new overlook.

@ziyadamir8187 2 жыл бұрын

Is there first video btw

@ziyadamir8187 2 жыл бұрын

@@Shahanshah.Shahin nah is already persian history isn't fascinating btw

@williamrobert9898 2 жыл бұрын

@@ziyadamir8187 No it is not

@Farouktoz Жыл бұрын

Love the series big fan. A couple of comments the clip does not highlight and I think they should be included for the history narrative. 1) Sykes Picot treaty between France and England. This treaty was forged in secret to occupy Ottoman territory after Arabs promised Arabs independence in return for revolting. This also includes taking away territories in Anatolia. 2) western powers had long had interests in Ottoman territory especially after oil discovery in Iraq. This of course shaped future conflicts in the region and still does. 3) being a Plural society in the Middle East Europe nationalism would never work and this something everyone failed to understand wether it is arab or Turkish nationalism. This idea had died out eventually. This also applies to the Balkans as it got partitioned and still has conflict and strife. 4)western powers instigated some revolts directly or indirectly via investments or missionaries or protectorates of minorities. I can name one is the Syrian/Lebanese civil war between Druze and Maronites. 5) the Egyptian incursion led by Mohamed ali took a toll on the region. As during that time the Egyptian army (cause we are taking arab or be specific Arabs in Arabian peninsula) was more modernized and better equipped than their ottoman counterparts literally Britain had to send their Navy and Aid the Ottomans. 6) Famine struck the whole region due to the war effort and British and French navy blockades and poor ottoman management. 7) some Arabs fought with the ottomans to the bitter end all the way to Gallipoli. 8) Young Turk and Al Fatat should be mentioned regarding Turkish and Arabic nationalizing ideals. 9) at a later stage prosecution of Arabs and not being in high official ranks who were against pan Turkism and joining World War One. Need a dive on how Ottomans moved from Tanzimat to Panturkisim who took power after and took decision to enter World War One. Overall I like this episode keep them coming.

@dehaman_4_144 Жыл бұрын

The British and French shaped Italy into nationalism through "young Italy". It was done against Austria and Spain, who had current Italian territory divided between them. Young Turks is the copy of Young Italy.

@thanhhoangnguyen4754 Жыл бұрын

@@dehaman_4_144 Or in this case for Enver Pasha he more like trying the coping Bismarck the way of unifying Germany.

@mohsinshabbir7717 Жыл бұрын

hey there, seems you have a great knowledge regarding this topic. Can you recommend me some books for this topic?

@atakorkut5110 Жыл бұрын

Another outstanding video with details, most wouldn’t even bother to mention. Outstanding. I hope my comment satisfies the algorithm gods😂

@xantiphos Жыл бұрын

Local nationalism, European imperialism, prosecution of minorities, Capitalism voracity...you can see those same things happening in the Middle East nowadays. Excellent and very informative video which helps us to understand contemporary issues.

@lovepeaceforall 3 ай бұрын

Not nowadays,it's happened in 1940s in Arab world and middle east. All Arab and middle east countries became more open , secular and western country. India was more conservative than those Arab countries till 1990s. Movies of Syria, Iran, Egypt,Iraq mostly showed bikini,lip kiss,full back nudity scene,even some shows full frontal nudity which was never showed in India movie

@ahmedbabiker6562 Ай бұрын

@@lovepeaceforall bro really saying nudity didn't exist in India 😂😂😂

@lovepeaceforall Ай бұрын

@@ahmedbabiker6562 I said about 1940-80s . Nudity,lip kiss, bikini scene began in Arab Cinema (Egypt, Syria, Lebanon) more earlier compared to indian cinema. Lip kiss , bikini was so common and normal 1960,70,80s Egyptian, Syrian, Lebanese movie where India was still conservative society and film industry on that time. Even in 1950s, Egyptian actress wore so short and revealing dress and had some lip kiss scene when indian actress wore conservative dress on that time .In 1980s, indian cinema began to Open,but perform lip kiss , intimate scene and bikini scenes was still considered bold ,risky and brave scene in Indian cinema ,after 1990s they became more open. You can see some indian movies of 1960,70,80s and also some Egyptian movies of 1960-80s and say which was more open and had more bold, nudity and open scenes. Also without the context of Lip kiss, bikini, intimate scene, Egyptian actress frequently and normally perform in short revealing dress in most time while actress wearing revealing dress was not so common(yes,there was still some scene where indian actress wore revealing dress ,but small percentage compared to Egyptian, Syrian cinema) in indian cinema till 1980s.

@uruguaylusitano5797 2 жыл бұрын

They revolt against their sultan and religious similar and trusted those whose they foughted for years only to be betrayed, allowing the infidel to hold Jerusalem, Beirut, Bagdad and more and then the creation of Israel and the balkanisation and economic vassalisation of their countries. Great job guys! 👏 If your ancestors in the crusades or Mongolian invasion saw that their sacrifices were for this they would not kept fighting

@gulk.t2313 Жыл бұрын

Yes and till this day we Turks call them arabs traitors.

@thisismeagain86 Жыл бұрын

Love your content, You have once again out done yourself by taking a hot topic, breaking it down and explaining it methodically, without bias. your channel consistently is out doing itself. Bravo.

@eldahalas7015 2 жыл бұрын

This is a Grand Topic we need follow up videos there are missing info.

@ricoaalst Жыл бұрын

immensely informative, a true eye opener, thanks!

@adamed984 Жыл бұрын

In Jordan we studied that the reasons the Arab revolted were: _The high taxes forced. _Forcing the Turkish language upon Arabs and trying to erase Arabic. _Treating Arabs like second class citizens _Military conscription upon Arabs _Jon Turkler movement and ittihad ve Terakki Cemiyeti and Sultan Abdulhamid dismissal. But we also been been taught about the ottomans fairly and that they had their ups and downs and they weren't occupiers and we were part of their empire.

@zuheyrcade6239 Жыл бұрын

Even the turks were taught that the ottomans want to erase the Turkish language and replace the Arabic on it's place , It's All about a British education , No matter who's the student turk or Arab,if he's a Muslim that's their goal to create problem between you .

@s123-v3x Жыл бұрын

@@asd-ip5hj I wish you to get rid of the Arabs from Israel

@deanticocombar7529 Жыл бұрын

@@asd-ip5hjRight 👍 that was the war of Arabs .Arabs are Arabs and they use Islam for them

@MiracNotFound Жыл бұрын

@@asd-ip5hjlet’s hope so; if we do one single move, they’ll find that as an opportunity to stab us in the back again 😂

@notkingali1798 Жыл бұрын

@@asd-ip5hjoh no please help us mister Turk… LMAO we don’t need you trash bags help, lmao go help your crumbling currency .last time you were kicked out of Arabia if you want we can come and kick you out of Anatolia too if you want.

@Ultracheese0 2 жыл бұрын

As a Turk i can understand Arabs wanna have an indipendent state but the problem is they can't even unite as a nation. Some Arabic countries are extremely rich and they don't really wanna take care of other Arabic countries. I am seeing some people from Saudi or UAE or Qatar saying "thanks god it happened" but would you say this if you guys weren't oil rich ? Don't get me wrong i am glad that some people are having nice life but what if you didn't have that ? I don't really understand point of being independent if you won't help your brother. Instead of that they are just funding terrorist organisations in other Arabic countries. I think it is weird.

@subutaynoyan5372 Жыл бұрын

I think it's partly because we all think them as a single body of society just because their overall language and customs are similar But they're vastly different to each other.

@omarkhaledshaker9902 Жыл бұрын

@@subutaynoyan5372 do you as a turk help your poor Uighurs brothers in china ?

@subutaynoyan5372 Жыл бұрын

@@omarkhaledshaker9902 How come a bunch of Uighurs stand my brothers to begin with?

@EzKurdim1 Жыл бұрын

@@subutaynoyan5372 Uighurs are also turkics

@subutaynoyan5372 Жыл бұрын

@@EzKurdim1 So?

@sitiasriheriyanipertiwi2512 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you for the video and links to refer all of the information provided here! 😁😁😁

@missionwinnow9238 2 жыл бұрын

Time is the best medicine.As ı am a Turk,we should get lessons from history.They betrayed Ottomans and middle east has never been same after Turks had to leave terrorities in middle east.Now There are just wars and blood in middle east.Rebels must be proud of what they did.Ottoman empire was really a big empire unlike colonist France and British empire.

@tunis-smugger5977 Жыл бұрын

There are no wars and the arabic peninsula is rich , prosperous and stable . Thanks god the ottoman nightmare is over

@altunaze6127 2 жыл бұрын

12:54 NOT ACCURATE İNFO! This railway Built by the aids of Indian Muslims, 30% of costs of this railway took by many foreign muslim's aids. This railway connected the Islamic geography together, so the European countries were against it. But the Great Sultan Abdulhamid Sâni was able to build this railway. Here also the goal was to combine the endless Ottoman oil with the Great German industry. (Berlin-Baghdad Railway). The British opposed this and then able tk dethroned Sultan Abdulhamid (1909). Then, after 10 years, the Ottoman Empire collapsed.

@saadshoaib901 2 жыл бұрын

Exactly

@KILLER.KNIGHT 10 ай бұрын

3:16 “Sunnis in the west.” Proceeds to show us the sect in the centre, which is Wahhabism.

@brokenbridge6316 2 жыл бұрын

This would be a really interesting video series to watch.

@FastTquick 2 жыл бұрын

Since we’re on the topic of the Ottoman Empire, I’m wondering why Egypt voluntarily divorced itself from the Ottomans only to become a client state of the British Empire?

@whispz2590 Жыл бұрын

@Garren which was their plan to make fail egyptians paying taxes

@JackRabbitSlim Жыл бұрын

@@garren561 That's what happens when you get involved with pyramid schemes...

@zico739 9 ай бұрын

An Ottoman puppet or a British puppet, you’re still a puppet.

@power_trooper 2 жыл бұрын

awesome video!

@MehediHasan-hf3do Жыл бұрын

My heart cries seeing how the sharif chose the brits over the caliph. Its only the indian muslims who supported the caliph until the abolition of caliphate.

@RisingEmpire1500 Жыл бұрын

Interesting stuff. I just watched the Lawrance of Arabia movie this weekend so this is a good background on what went on!

@TheMatin1 Жыл бұрын

03:12 This word Wahabbism is ethnic European Propagation same as the middle East, now if India is said to be East India, it's names are Bharat, Hindustan. India is a colonial name, although since it's meaning is a place of natives, it's not much of a concern.

@noeru9s 2 жыл бұрын

Very interesting. Thank you.

@MrZincir Жыл бұрын

As Turks, we learned good lessons from the Arabs. Thanks to Israel, they see the consequences of their actions

@benhamoudaahmed6894 Жыл бұрын

Not all arbs revolted for example tunisia this is fitna trying to distant Arab sunni and sunni turks don't fall for this brother traitors existed in every nation when Algeria was fighting French for independence some Algerian fought with the French

@abul-1993 Жыл бұрын

You colonise their lands and expect them not to fight back? 😂 Why did you guys fight in 1922 for your land instead of surrendering and living under Europeans?

@Timurid1370 Жыл бұрын

@@abul-1993YOU GET WHAT YOU WANTED YEARS AGO! 🇹🇷❤️🇮🇱❤️🇦🇿

@lmfaorats Жыл бұрын

You are not turk nor arab, u are israeli bot son of who**re

@HadouOfRivia Жыл бұрын

Not all Arabs hated Turks as an Algerian I never met an Algerian who claimed to hate turks

@myweirderside Жыл бұрын

4:41 the bedouin and city Arabs are different people with different cultures. The city Arabs weren't " bedouin" and didn't associate themselves with them mostly. In fact, it was known that the richer city Arabs often hired bedouins in the ottoman era as low wage servants to complete basic jobs.

@isma92 2 жыл бұрын

thank you for the great video! would have been nice to have a more accurate depiction of makkah in the 19th century. In the video it looked like what it was looking like in the 6th century 😆

@robbabcock_ 2 жыл бұрын

Awesome video! I feel like the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire is a topic most of us in the West don't know much about.

@kunalroy9735 Жыл бұрын

Arab nations never ever forget what they done to ibn-e-Saud in Istanbul. Every Arab emotion has with his sacrifice.

@YOU_1192 8 ай бұрын

yup ottomans betrayed him and destroyed the diryah and killed his people what a shame

@theia4296 8 ай бұрын

2. Mahmud vahabilere az bile yapmış

@Provision600 Жыл бұрын

The Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) said, "The Hour will not come to pass before the River Euphrates dries up to unveil the mountain of gold, for which people will fight. Ninety-nine out of one hundred will die (in the fighting) and every man amongst them will say: 'Perhaps I may be the only one to remain alive."' Riyad as-Salihin 1822

@ubeydullahsalihyldz7903 Жыл бұрын

I am Turkish; My grandfather was in the war of the Hejaz. He survived the disintegrating army. Atatürk saved us from these bad days. I swear that I will walk the path opened by Atatürk without getting tired.

@trillmoney263 Жыл бұрын

Yup shareef Hussein saved us and Muhammad Ali pasha

@легенда-ц2ш Жыл бұрын

ok ubeydallah saleh

@zuheyrcade6239 Жыл бұрын

Mustafa kemal was just a spy and pretended someone saving you from a stone and then shot you dead. Turkey has no nuclear weapons neither the arabs while even France had it.

@deanticocombar7529 Жыл бұрын

@@trillmoney263why not now they save you from isreal also 😂

@MiracNotFound Жыл бұрын

@@deanticocombar7529😂

@biscolataman Жыл бұрын

In the social hierarchy there were clear distinctions of status and power between “ Turks ” ( atrak ) , the term usually applied by native Egyptian writers to both Ottomans and Mamluks , and the Arabic - speaking indigenous population whom those in power often lumped together as " peasants " ( fallahin ) regardless of occu- pation or residence . Egypt: A Short History James P. Jankowski · 2000 · p.60

@michaelpothoven1041 2 жыл бұрын

Who else noticed the Civ5 Ottoman theme in there? Nice reference!

@kamranismayilzade3789 Жыл бұрын

Yes, indeed. Civ soundtrack is often used in K&G videos. Videos for Celts, Mesopotamian civilizations, Mongolian empire involved it as well. Maybe others too, haven't noticed.

@jananchoudhury1503 Жыл бұрын

4:47 Clarification: The Wahhabi War wasn't an Arab revolt against the Ottomans, since the Ottomans never took control of the region of Nejd (not to be confused with the coastal Nejd al Hasa)

@pirateking45 Жыл бұрын

Ottoman had to fall. The rest of the Islamic world fell. Only Persians remained free. Hindustan fall, central Asia, east Asia fell. The worst days of Muslims begins. Though I as a Muslim support this. Hard time creates strong men. Islam re risen from Ashes. Now it's in Europe. Thanks to colonialism. The unstoppable tide of Islam.

@NoName-jb4tl Жыл бұрын

Imagine: helping the British conquer Mekka agains the Khalif...

@fisalalmalki6090 Жыл бұрын

العثمانين سيدخلون اليهود في مكة كما ادخلوا اليهود في فلسطين وهي ليست خلافة هم ليسوا عرب.

@NoName-jb4tl Жыл бұрын

@@fisalalmalki6090 ?

@Freeman52 Ай бұрын

@@fisalalmalki6090what😆?

@mango2005 Жыл бұрын

Some parallels with other empires that broke up when the monarch attempted to centralise control of of the colonies, like George III losing America, or the alienation of the Hispanic elites by the Spanish Bourbon reforms. Could you do a video on the Hispanic American wars of independence? Thanks.

@DABViktor 2 жыл бұрын

Thank you the Video and the English subtitle.

@nikolaosboukouvalas449 2 жыл бұрын

It's funny how Turks and Greeks get along well abroad and joke about their bad blood, but when Turks and Arabs meet abroad, they get one step from throwing hands over this subject and who betrayed whom.

@trillmoney263 Жыл бұрын

They got stomped by the Egyptians. Them and erdogan and their action of trying to bring neo ottomanism. They’ll get clowned on by Egypt again.

@Noor-xl2ow Жыл бұрын

The Turks who do that are just European wannabes , Arabs don't even open this topic at all , some Turks do open it and call Arabs as betrayers , but most of my Turkish friends and brothers would call it "fitnah" and move on

@İsraildestekçisiturk 14 күн бұрын

Thats because greeks attacking us cannot be considered a betrayal. We really took their lands. But arabs were the first ones to attack us. The first east turkestan massacre was done by the arabs not the chinese. So we destroyed their empire in return. But in greeks' case, we were the first to attack them.

@lerneanlion 2 жыл бұрын

Between the Ottoman Empire did not join World War I and survive to modern days and the Khedivate of Egypt eventually rose to become the new major Islamic power instead of the Ottoman Empire, which sounds more likely? Regardless of which happened, Britain will still won anyway in some ways. If not by military victories, then the political and diplomatic victories are most likely. And the Hejaz will be in the hands of the Muslim dynasty that did not practice Wahhabism in this timeline.

@abomarsyr103 Жыл бұрын

Corrections: The revolt was not against the ottomans. It was against the young Turks who led a coup against abdulhamid. They were the final reason for the end of the empire, and they sacrificed so many Arab soldiers for no reason in WWI. Sharif Hussein didn’t go out by his own choice, but he was asked to by so many groups or societies in the levant as if he was looked at as the best leader or alternative.

@abomarsyr103 Жыл бұрын

@Mas-ud Al-hassan and an absolute no connection with my comment of course keep copy cut

@tayyipsoyler3403 Жыл бұрын

British agent Lawrence : Arabs killed Turks so much that I hated even those who did not have weapons... Now every Syrian Iraqi Palestinian Yemeni who dies, bombs are exploding every day.

@tayyipsoyler3403 Жыл бұрын

Is Israel very good, one of the young Turks who staged a coup, now it is also changing with the election, we are not Arabs, we send it if we don't like it. It searches for incoming and outgoing. Now let Israel allow you to pray in al-Aqsa Mosque.