Get that NMO goodnessssss 🙌🏻 New Boxy T is soooo nice Torry killed it! And its the last chance to get the hoodie & long length sweater 🙏🏻
@stevenkralovec2 жыл бұрын
Quick question: will the NMO sweatshirt shrink after the wash/dryer?
@matslaveborn22512 жыл бұрын
Of course I just ordered both some Boxy T’s and hoodie just because it is You 🤗
@cissehawa2 жыл бұрын
Do you ship to Australia?
@XOAgnt007OX2 жыл бұрын
Would love to get one of those hoodies in Australia, how can we arrange that?
@cheapomedia2 жыл бұрын
A 24-70 is a very versatile lens, it's great if you're just starting out in filmmaking and you're wondering which lens should you buy first, also a good 24-70 lens will last you a lifetime. On the other hand, your comment is valid, it may lack character however you can also upgrade your gear in the future and opt for a good prime lens set. Tip: Own the basics and rent the rest if you're doing this as a career 😉
@liceafilms10 ай бұрын
This is the best advice
@qapturenlfilms2 жыл бұрын
Hey yo, quick tip to anyone who doesn't vlog or point a camera at their own face from a couple centimeters away.. A 24-70 f/2.8 is pretty much the only lens you will need if filming with a full frame camera, I'd recommend the sigma unless you've got very deep pockets. Also love your new secretary Matti, he knows his codecs well. 👌
@urbanrunoff2 жыл бұрын
so true. if i'd shoot a documentary with a director/producer the 24-70 or even 24-105 would be my first choice. maybe a prime for b-roll after that if we have time. Been there done that, if your job is to get the shot... .
@maruwaanmoses2 жыл бұрын
Agree man. I always see the 16-35 as a YT lens, whereas the 24-70 is a filmmaker lens.
@LanceRoylo Жыл бұрын
Agreed
@Niklondon3 ай бұрын
Absolutely agree, for actual narrative filmmaking such as features, short film etc… it’s pretty much all you need. Majority of cinema use these focal lengths and very much so at f2.8.
@mattl74243 ай бұрын
@@maruwaanmosesso I shouldn’t get it? Just a smaller lense?
@TheGroovyGuitarDude2 жыл бұрын
I’ve tended to stay away from 24-70s lately for that same reason, but they are great if you want to only carry one lens!
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
Yea there’s nothing wrong with it. I’ve just never felt like I needed one.
@gelluny2 жыл бұрын
Or if you only able to purchase one lens
@jeremydrakeford31242 жыл бұрын
I'm definitely my least inspired when using my RF 24-70, but it saves me bringing a bag full of lenses. Worth it just for the convenience!
@maxim.horoshilov2 жыл бұрын
Exactly 👌
@marat94632 жыл бұрын
@@jeremydrakeford3124 never was a fan of a 24-70, but 28-70 f2 became my go to lens lately, loving the picture and versatility
@JarrodsTech2 жыл бұрын
I've only used a Sigma 18-35 for my GH5 at f/2.8 for YEARS, so I figured if I change to a7s III that something like this would give me basically the same range. I'm ok with "average" 😅
@tylercornelison2 жыл бұрын
I’m actually stoked you mentioned the minimum focus distance. It’s something that’s incredibly important to me but is so overlooked on reviews!
@GuusStemerding2 жыл бұрын
Youre watching the wrong channels mate
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
100% maybe even the biggest upgrade for me personally
@wingcreator2 жыл бұрын
Min focus are amazing on 24-70/70-200 GM2
@CamberFilmSchool2 жыл бұрын
The tightening of the zoom ring is probably so that it won't change focal lengths if it gets bumped or for an overhead shot so that the weight of the lens doesn't change the focal length (that has happened to me on a sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 because it was really loose). Loosening focal ring it will help with smoother zooms.
@wingcreator2 жыл бұрын
Yes
@TristanErvin2 жыл бұрын
Dude. Issac is freakin HILARIOUS! Definitely adds a spark to this channel 😂
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
Haha pretty much the reason I hired him
@RiceCubeTech2 жыл бұрын
I use the sigma 24-70 2.8 ART and it’s one of the best lenses I’ve ever owned. It’s so versatile and I use it on most if not every shoot unless I’m using my underwater housing, or doing architecture photography in which I use my 20mm 1.8. Carrying 4 lenses to achieve the relatively same focusing range (24mm 35mm 50mm and 85mm), just isn’t realistic for a lot of people who aren’t in a studio. This lens looks great but with already owning the sigma, this doesn’t offer enough difference
@smooky1983 Жыл бұрын
I think it’s completely depending on what line of work your in. I mean, for example for run & gun work, i think this is the absolute best if you don’t know what to expect and want a variety of shots. But yeah, not the best at anything, i can agree on that, but maybe the best allrounder.
@kcliffordphoto2 жыл бұрын
I function solely off 24 and 85mm, the 85 can grab close and medium shots while the 24 can grab any wide documentation shot I want. You don’t NEED anything just do what works for you; I wanted faster apertures so I went primes
@danielshepherd73062 жыл бұрын
It's funny to hear you say that you find the 24-70mm f/2.8 to be too average. I didn't buy one for the same reason. I purchased ultra-wide and telephoto zooms & primes in 35mm f/1.2 & anamorphic 50mm t/2.9 instead. But, for "run&gun" video I usually use a 24-105mm f/4 macro stabilised lens, as it covers a larger zoom range. (Panasonic S1H.)
@jwate2 жыл бұрын
I have sigmas 24-70, it works. I can agree with your reasons. I don’t see a reason to upgrade to the new GM, but I’m sure it’s solid.
@lastyrsman2 жыл бұрын
I've been trying to get ahold of the Tamron 35 - 150 2.0. The versatility and the price make it really appealing. And for traveling, having two or three multiple purpose lenses means the most to me. I love my primes, but too much space for most traveling.
@robcoventry5742 жыл бұрын
Interesting to hear why you haven’t purchased a 24-70. What’s interesting is your reasons not to buy are the reasons that is my number one go-to lens. I don’t like to carry three lenses (35mm, 50mm, & 85mm) when I can have one that covers roughly the same range. When was the last time I needed more than f/2.8? Can’t remember. In fact, f/2.8 is more than most of m6 shots. Sure, you get amazing bokeh with an f/1.2 but that is just over two stops better. It also makes the focus plane about five mm thick, so eye in focus but nose out. Love my RF 24-70. It’s always on my camera, every day, walk around lens.
@kanaheiusagi2 жыл бұрын
depth of field is relative to the distance from subject, so a 50 f1.2 wide open actually have decent depth of field and subject separation for mid length to full body shots
@OllyJelleyWildlife2 жыл бұрын
I have to say, I had a 16-35 for a while, but when you're actually going light, it just isn't enough range for pulling an interesting variety of shots together for a mini-sequence, especially on FF! Switched out to a 24-70 2.8ii (Canon) a few years ago and never looked back. Truly cannot love any 24-105 or similar though, that F4 just really takes the edge off everything and it's just a bit dull! Joined the Fx6 gang a month ago now though, so looking at the painful reality of selling all my canon glass as that sony AF is just W I L D.
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
I just love wide focal lengths way more 😊
@OllyJelleyWildlife2 жыл бұрын
@@mattih I mostly film wildlife, so I guess I just have that eternal tele draw!! 🤣
@BabyJett7772 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU. I have been debating on buying an 85mm 1.2 as my first expensive lens. I also want a 35 prime. I just dont like the idea of a 24-70, seems boring.
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
Oh 35 is so good 🙌🏻
@HunterCash2 жыл бұрын
doesn't Danny Gevirtz used a 24-70 for most of his films? i thought i heard that in the bts for his bicycle video. I tend to use the 24-70 a lot for car photography
@Narsuitus2 ай бұрын
Years ago, I bought a 35-70mm f/2.8 D Nikkor auto focus zoom lens. Later, I upgraded to 28-70mm f/2.8 D Nikkor auto focus zoom lens. When Nikon replaced the 28-70 D with the 24-70mm f/2.8 G auto focus zoom lens, I did not buy it because it was a “G” lens that did not have an aperture ring. Some of my camera bodies need the aperture ring for exposure control.
@JoshRussell2 жыл бұрын
Can we talk about that Green Bay Super Bowl Hat for a second!!! Repping my home town boyyyyy!!!!
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
😂
@steezcnoir2 жыл бұрын
Totally agree with you. Like most people would say, this is just a one shot lens where you don’t have to change lens much. I use primes mainly so it’s either super wide or 70-200 would be my zoom I have. Btw, I purchased your NMO boxy t and crew neck long sleeve!
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
Oh heck yesssss 🙌🏻 enjoy them man 😊
@jessejayphotography2 жыл бұрын
I have to disagree. Unless you are holding the camera and pointing it at yourself all the time, a 24-70 is a much better story telling lens than a wide zoom. I would much rather have a wide, fast prime such as a 20mm f1.8, 24-70 f2.8, and a 70-200 f2.8. Work horse focal ranges are convenient while the specialty ones (wide or telephoto) are present and at fast apertures when needed. Obvious use cases vary but that kind of kit is extremely flexible.
@TuckerPearce2 жыл бұрын
Love the look. Curious why you went with 100% cotton rather than a poly blend.
@ParchutingPanda2 жыл бұрын
24-105 is nice for weddings and other live events where switching lenses isn't convenient, but 24-70 probably wouldn't be enough reach for me
@butchgo53462 жыл бұрын
The Nikon 24-70 2.8 was my first zoom and the only one I still have in my kit.
@f0t0b0y2 жыл бұрын
I’m with you on this one. I’ve owned one 24-70 in my life and it pretty much stayed in the bag all the time. I recently switched to Sony after shooting canon for 20 years and I find if I need a Swiss Army of a lens; the 24-105 G has a better place for wide and tight; run and gun shots.
@RamenKing2023 Жыл бұрын
I have the Sony 24-105 G and I just purchased the Sony 24-70 today. I will have to check it out for myself when it comes in the mail in a couple days. I am a film student currently in school.
@f0t0b0y Жыл бұрын
@@RamenKing2023 Kick ass man! I wouldn’t want to do anything else.
@ClaudioDesideriFilms2 жыл бұрын
Fair point Matti. Lately I'm pondering if I should buy a Tamron 28-75 GII fully customisable which many say it's great or get a telephoto lens which I'm a big fan of. Also I'm wondering if it's just better to save money and get one of the Zeiss Batis which is my kid's dream😻
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
I’ve never owned a batis but they look soooo good haha
@ClaudioDesideriFilms2 жыл бұрын
@@mattih yes sir they do, I personally love Daniel Schiffer video's look and he often uses few Batis prime lenses. What would I do to put my hands on one of them!
@MichaelFlores-sj9zb8 ай бұрын
I love your take. I'm curious how you travel with a wide zoom, a 24, a 35, and an 85. I'm usually shooting docs on my own for weeks at a time that's far from home, and I try to lighten my load as much as I can, so I stick to a 24-70 2.8 and a 70-200 4.0. Do you have people helping you lug stuff?
@chanceGWP2 жыл бұрын
I agree. I use my 24-70 less and less as I got better, because of its “averageness.” Now I prefer fast primes.
@rickt.8866 Жыл бұрын
I started going back to primes in my kit, 24GM, 35GM, 85 DG DN, and my #1 zoom tamron 35-150 2-2.8
@ehteshamahmedburney02 жыл бұрын
Love your work. You are the inspiration for me to start my channel.
@Potaters12 Жыл бұрын
If you're on a gimbal and on a fast-paced job, where it just takes too long to be switching lenses constantly and rebalancing, the 24-70 is really the best option out there.
@MANOLET2 жыл бұрын
I still have the tamron 28-75mm f2.8. Paired with sony a7siii and I’m happy with it. Very cheap!
@piusgyagenda2 жыл бұрын
Greatest lens 😍 I love your new editor his soo cool and funny
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
He’s great 😊
@imnickfriend2 жыл бұрын
honestly I have never had one either. I had the 24-105 lens but the ONLY reason i had it was because I couldnt affort nice prime lenses. and I found myself in jobs where i didnt have time to swap glass. NOW, though. I pretty much only shoot at 24mm or 85mm. Yes. I only use primes now. and i LUUUUURV it.
@bagnesimmobiliersarl25402 жыл бұрын
Hi Nick.... just receive a message, same as you below.. can we trust it ?
@BlakeDavis422 жыл бұрын
I have the Sigma 24-70 and I use that thing 20x more than my 16-35!
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
Noooo how could you 😂 my channel is 99% 16-35 haha
@BlakeDavis422 жыл бұрын
@@mattih Haha I knew I was bringing up a touchy subject lol.
@ADHTube2 жыл бұрын
Even though many probably would say you’re ranting, I appreciate the knowledge I glean from your videos concerning focal lengths, focus shifting, etc. Keep up the good work Matti. We’re learning a lot.
@vaidehiarts2 жыл бұрын
Cool! You should try the Lumix S5 with the 20-60 at some point. Hits the sweet spot at the wide end, at least
@vidopnir2 жыл бұрын
As a Norwegian I always appreciate a nice looking mirror 🤩
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
🙏🏻
@smoloms2 жыл бұрын
For me and how i shoot im either at super wide or punched in. So go to lenses are samyang 12mm or sigma 56mm and occasionally sony 85mm. then i have a 70-300. I do have a sigma 18-50 but i’ve found that yes it’s convenient to have, id rather have the wider apertures on the primes in a lot of situations.
@benjhaisch2 жыл бұрын
Reasons I just picked up the Sigma 28-70/2.8 as it’s 470g. So small and light. When I need wider, I’ll choose a wide lens
@hesalisanaradamsuvi56462 жыл бұрын
Solid video quality! ✌🏻 Enjoying these new videos and the color grading looks beautiful. Keep creating dude hey don't expose it to the rain 😂😂
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
Haha thanks dude 🙏🏻
@iamishyy2 жыл бұрын
Hey Matti, isn't the 24-70mm referred to as the best when it comes to car photography?
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
Maybe? I dunno 🤷🏼♂️
@JoseAntonioRomeroH2 жыл бұрын
Nothing beats in portability to the Sigma 28-70mm F2.9 DG DN C. Only 470gr and it's tiny compared to that one.
@davjeon4272 жыл бұрын
Isn't that f2.8 not f2.9? But yes it's also the cheapest as it's now a third of the price of the new Sony GM ii.
@SonnyNguyen. Жыл бұрын
24-70 is my most important lens it’s for run and gun situation most versatile and the very decent low light great for events and parties scenario I wouldn’t trade it up for anything else my work horse bread and butter lens
@GlassfilmWeddings2 жыл бұрын
If you shot weddings, 24-70 essential. 50 1.2 is amazing too
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
Never once used one for a wedding and I filmed a bunch 😂
@TOMMYHSUImageStudio2 жыл бұрын
I shot weddings, but never thought of 24-70, because it's too heavy for my gimbal and of coz my arms.
@RobertsIslandLivingAdventures2 жыл бұрын
I have the old 24-70mm. I have to hold it at full arms length to vlog. That’s heavy after a few minutes.
@b1gdan2 жыл бұрын
What lense are you using there? edit 16-35! Which one did you take?
@JustinVachon2 жыл бұрын
What sound panels are you using in your studio? I just got a space and I'm looking for something like them
@wilhelmw34552 жыл бұрын
Same here I own a 24-70 f2.8, it’s boring but it gets the job done if you need an all round high quality zoom lens.
@ferencczuczor77667 ай бұрын
It's funny that I was trying to figure out for months what kind of lenses do I need after a brand change.. and I came to the same conclusion! And now I am having the "perfect" set and loving it for a month now.. this video just popped up today and confirms I've made a good decision for my purposes ;-)
@TAPPChannel2 жыл бұрын
Please don't tell Us soon that you're coming back to Canon :D I have 24-70 original one... Pretty good stuff...
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
Haha not right now at least 😂 they are sleeping with their cameras
@joelklein922 жыл бұрын
Love the Green Bay Packers hat!!
@TuckerPearce2 жыл бұрын
I 2nd that!
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
😂 he’s my style guru now
@stevenkralovec2 жыл бұрын
We need more of those endings Matti 😂
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
😂 every video ends in an action scene
@stevenkralovec2 жыл бұрын
Yesssssss 🔥😂
@davidrodgersphotography2 жыл бұрын
That's the beauty of the Canon 28-70 f2.... All the convenience of a zoom but with the sharpness of a prime and a wider aperture than the average zoom
@jessebealemedia2 жыл бұрын
What do you mostly use your prime lens for?
@bardomeister2 жыл бұрын
Love the interaction man. You excel with other people around you! Isaac is a keeper 🥳
@michaellacroixofficial2 жыл бұрын
I bought the 24-70 f2.8 Gmaster in Dec... Now there is a version ii? ugh annoyed...
@aliddlemore2 жыл бұрын
Love your glasses!!
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
Thank you 🙏🏻 😊
@matthewpaquette2 жыл бұрын
LOOOL iisak is hilarious!
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
😊 you guys would get along
@kylerrichardson48582 жыл бұрын
Thank you! Ive never understood the hype around the 24-70. I’ve always felt like it was uninteresting average thing.
@ConceptNewEra2 жыл бұрын
I have the Tamron 28-75 but have been looking to upgrade potentially! Love hearing your thoughts on the new 24-70, it seems like beast! Might have to get it! 💯✔️🔥
@mydearriley2 жыл бұрын
3:05 does anyone know of a good engineering video that would explain how this system works?
@tylercornelison2 жыл бұрын
For me, buying a 24-70 is like buying a Gucci bag: looks so nice, but I can’t justify the cost 😅🤦🏼♂️
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
Bahahah this is good 😂
@heathbarlow87692 жыл бұрын
New podcast? What about the old one? I miss it. It's been so long😢
@adrianmullan2 жыл бұрын
That’s end clip had me in stitches 🤣😂 more ending like that please! Completely agree with you on the 24-70mm!
@ToxicChaos2 жыл бұрын
Let me tell you a 24-70mm is a vacation lense if you prefer taking more portraits. i have a 16-35mm for vacations i can take my portraits and my landscape\travel photography shots. Basically you dont have to carry all your kit at your vacations. these lenses are cool.
@GreggoryMiller2 жыл бұрын
I've been out grinding and not watching as much KZbin, but I really missed you Matti!
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
Aw thanks 😊 🙏🏻 glad you came back
@GreggoryMiller2 жыл бұрын
@@mattih I'm glad to be back! You're still my favorite videographer ;)
@aliddlemore2 жыл бұрын
I’ve got a tamron 24-70mm. Beast of a lens 🔥🔥
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
There all freaking good 🙌🏻
@VZCaesar2 жыл бұрын
I know a 25-70mm lens with constant aperture of 1.2 It can actually be extended to 135mm (and even 189mm with a trick) Sigma 18-35 + Speedboster on a Lumix 😁 It is a 25-50mm which can be optionally cropped to 35-70mm 1.2 with the pixel/pixel readout in 4k and 67-135mm 1.2 in HD (but the noise gets too noticeable in HD) Great lens, unfortunately no autofocus is possible
@TiberiousGreene2 жыл бұрын
Watching and thinking with your clothing brand you should bring back a limited edition one with the learn make repeat and travel feels design under your new clothing brand
@RobertsIslandLivingAdventures2 жыл бұрын
Just heard Issac say I can take my FX3 underwater. I’m looking forward to making snorkeling videos. 👍😁
@jessbreheret2 жыл бұрын
Just got to full frame with a a7IV and a sigma art 24-70 and i understand the average at everything . I miss the 85 1.8 i had on an aps c with the nifty fifty from canon for example big time . 24-70 is a swiss knife , nothing more , nothing less .
@mrobitwice772 жыл бұрын
I also have the A7iv. Got the 35 gm to start and added the 70-200 2.8 mk2 . I have zero regrets with those two combos. Maybe someday I get the 16-35 but not anytime soon
@jonshin312 жыл бұрын
Totally agree on the 24-70, just nothing special about it - sure you can get special images, but not special because of the lens. I will say though that I still keep one just for those times that I feel lazy and only want to carry around a single body+lens. But there's nothing like a 14mm, or an f1.2-1.4 prime, or a real telephoto zoom for that special sauce you can't get with a 24-70.
@Hoagmatthew2 жыл бұрын
Mocks the price of a Sony lens then pitches a black t-shirt for $40 😂😂
@KnightmareOX2 жыл бұрын
For that price I’d rather go for the Tamron 35-150 f2-2.8.
@jinaix2 жыл бұрын
Agreed
@lebaje12 жыл бұрын
Sony does make shaper lens than tamron and that lens is bigger. For people that won't use higher than 70mm, i would understand why. I bought the Tamron 28-250mm and i love it so yeah, i with you with ''team Tamron''
@mylzq2 жыл бұрын
Legend has it that Matti only shoots instagram bangers on a 35 prime.
@Worldwildstories2 жыл бұрын
Thats the only one I own lmao
@RenderMeTV2 жыл бұрын
I think that is always a "depends" situation, for some, a 24-70 is the perfect lens, for instance, a wedding photographer, has no much time to keep changing lenses all day, has to be fast, so this range, fits in every situation, of course, not super wide, not super zoom or not super fast, but it does the job done, which is the most important, is not the tool, is the artist, and how uses the gear
@bagnesimmobiliersarl25402 жыл бұрын
Switzerland is missing in your delivery's list !! damn !!
@MrBthames20002 жыл бұрын
13th. Which is better than first.
@SakuraGraffiti2 жыл бұрын
I always felt that the 24-70 was the must-have lens for any system but now that I have one , these days I just use my 50mm more than anything.
@tonyamartin1425 Жыл бұрын
sitting here looking at my 50mm 1.2 like hmmm
@marcoslo0006311 ай бұрын
That’s 3 of us 😂 50mm 🤙🏽
@tonyamartin142511 ай бұрын
it does seem to have a filmlike look on the fx3 and fx6
@AlmightyPyro Жыл бұрын
for crop sensor I think the 17-55mm is better but that’s just my opinion.
@AtongAndal2 жыл бұрын
First! 🔥🔥🔥 Greetings from the Philippines Matti! 🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭
@patrik.53142 жыл бұрын
That ad for your brand was slick! Very nice, matti!
@marioplumber35642 жыл бұрын
The 24-70mm is over hyped. It encompasses the most common focal lengths, but it doesn't do them as well as their prime counterparts. I'd be willing to pay $3k for one IF AND ONLY IF, they could get it to a f/2 or f/1.8. Beyond that, I'll get a used 24mm GM and a 85mm.
@edgardbmedia2 жыл бұрын
Great video.. I was finally able to cop me a Boxy T. Blessings BTW your ending was hilarious hahaha
@jeremiahmott2 жыл бұрын
Love the boxy t! Just picked one up ⚡️
@mattih2 жыл бұрын
Oh heck yea 🙌🏻 you will love it 😊
@GrantMFletcher2 жыл бұрын
SO excited for the new podcast! MATTI IS FULL OF SECRETS 🤯
@JoshuaMcTackett2 жыл бұрын
The place of a 24-70 isn't for being the best at anything. It's for being a crisp, fairly quick lens for working quick in dynamic stations. Shooting weddings with RF Canon, mine gets used all the time with the RF 70-200. I sub them out for 35/85 in portrait and super low light situations, and use the tiny 16mm 2.8 when I really need to go super wide or do vlog stuff. Even then I find myself often stopping down my primes to 2.8 or 4 so both people are the point of focus on couples portraits.
@franklinpark44752 жыл бұрын
My 24-70 Sigma Art lens is coming next week. In the video, you mention 24-70 lenses don't do anything perfectly but a lot of things just ok. The quote "a jack of all trades is a master of none, but oftentimes better than a master of one" comes to mind. For someone who doesn't need ultra wide or telephoto, 24-70 is the sweet spot and all I need (for now).
@darbaz11922 жыл бұрын
03:50 MUSIC NAME ?? pls..
@DevendraSalvi_12082 жыл бұрын
Completely agree! I rented one once and ended up not using it.
@welp50322 жыл бұрын
Im sad to see the hoodie go, for reasons i cant say i cannot buy one, and probably wont be able to for a long time
@itzajdmting2 жыл бұрын
As a beginner last year with an A7iii, the 24-105 f4 I tested in the store blew my mind with all of the new options it gave me. So I've had it for nearly a year now, and although there is a large following for this lens, there are many folks who just state that it is just not good enough optically, and have replaced it with the sigma 24-70 art. I would love to hear from anyone who has experience of both these lenses...as I'm thinking of trading this lens in now. Maybe for a 24-70 and a 70-200 or a 100-400.
@wingcreator2 жыл бұрын
The Sony 24-105 G is a very good lens. Don’t listen to the rubbish comments. It can produce great result in the right hangs! Ok, it is not the greatest for low light but the extra 70-105mm reach is very handy. Yes 24-70 2.8 GM2 is the top dog!
@wingcreator2 жыл бұрын
24-70 2.8 GM2 and 24-105 4.0 G serve slightly different purposes. If money is not an issue, keep the 24105G as well when you are just walking about (of course sell it if budget is an issue and you can live without 70-105mm). Buy 24-70 / 70-200 GM2 (Then you have 24-200 2.8 by carrying a bit more weight). Later can add 1.4/2.0x to make up to 140-400mm 5.6.
@realamericannegro9772 жыл бұрын
I just thought about how hilarious your logo is. You silly for that.
@KennethGreenCMP2 жыл бұрын
Seriously, I am impressed that you could jump up on the couch like that in skinny jeans and run away. But I do find the 24 to 70 to be a good all around lens especially when shooting on location.
@UnknownSageMaster2 жыл бұрын
Last 30 seconds were legendary
@DiegoJoseSJaime2 жыл бұрын
Everything good until the price was set. I’ll keep my Sigma 24-70
@covertopfilms37512 жыл бұрын
Few popular reviews on this thing so far and yours is the best! Agree with the meh-ness of the 24-70
@ruff1draft2 жыл бұрын
Mattie I like your fashion portraits simple yet cool