India’s economic boom faces an urgent pitfall: sharing the wealth: on.wsj.com/3UPLhdC
@সুমন্তনাগ7 ай бұрын
How many CCP money has been gobbled up under project 1376 ?
@hetalsinghal85857 ай бұрын
BJP 400+ Jai shree ram🙏❤
@Sam-yt9qj7 ай бұрын
Poor reporting riddles with so many factual inaccuracies. They found one sad-looking person full of communist ideology and the entire narrative is based on his own feelings about India. This report is no different from the Freedom Index or V-dem report on India which ranks Afghanistan and Pakistan higher than India in certain categories. Propaganda at its peak. No wonder the external affairs Minister of India Dr. Jaishankar accused the western media of biases
Ayodhya is not Hindu Vatican, just like how Vatican is not Christian Ayodhya.
@akk4247 ай бұрын
👍🏼
@covfefe17877 ай бұрын
it technically is because the Vatican is older than the current temple and its vision. The ancient temple was not the center of Hinduism unlike the current plan for Ayodhya to be the capital of hindusim.
@7hroomy7 ай бұрын
Based
@gauravshukla757 ай бұрын
@@covfefe1787it is not .. technically or otherwise . Vatican was apolitical set up with no spiritual significance other than the fact that Christians did not have access to the lands on which Christ lived . This is actually the birthplace of Ram - with a temple which was destroyed and a mosque built to humiliate the locals . You should know history and faith before drawing parallels which make no sense .
@ASeeker-99997 ай бұрын
Why do all western media conveniently not mention that Supreme Court gave the 2.7 acre disputed land to Hindus to build their temple and the same ruling also gave a prominent 5 acre land to Muslims to build their mosque. Temple main building is done but will take another 2 years to complete. Meanwhile even the mosque in Ayodya called the Mohammad bin Abdullah mosque will complete as well. It will be the biggest mosque in India n will hold the largest Quran in the world. Imam of Mecca will be coming to do the first prayers. If this is not secularism then what is?? Can you imagine a temple or a mosque being built in Vatican holy city or a church or temple being built in the holy city of Mecca?? Only Hindus will accept this because they are just happy that the supreme court gave them the 2.7acre holy site back!
@harshbardhan13307 ай бұрын
Mosque was not built on ruins rather it was built by demolishing the temple.
@akhripasta26707 ай бұрын
Left it's pillars & foundation intact & used it for the mosque
@shubhamkashyap46827 ай бұрын
They can't tell that,,, Western hypocrisy...
@lestergutierrez28167 ай бұрын
That was common to muslim to build on top of other religious buildings to show the superiority of islamic colonialism. Maldives allow only muslims to live there and the media don't care about islamic countries under sharia, but they get offended about Hindu countries .
@medintar6767 ай бұрын
That was for political purpose just like now
@Dudsky7 ай бұрын
They have to run their propaganda, right?
@shayanraj78407 ай бұрын
Ayodhya is older than Vatican. Hinduism is older than Christianity. But it is Hindu Vatican Project.
@jayantkumar45427 ай бұрын
Well said brother!
@rohitprajapati97207 ай бұрын
jokes on them... kids belonging to some years old religiion teach about wht is good and whts is not...on other hand they kill people in name of religion...
@Editsdevil7 ай бұрын
This is how the west tries to control us culturally
@niramu637 ай бұрын
Western media - time started from A.D. For Hindus, civilization is several millennium old.
@sonicblare7 ай бұрын
Clever. But whatever the name, the largest democracy in the world standing for a religion is troubling. Secular republic is more of a text book topic than a reality
@Itachi_88mm7 ай бұрын
When Supreme court of India gave clear Judgment, who are you to call it, Controversial ?
@BrunoDias12343 ай бұрын
@elonmusk:"Indian nationalist bots are at work!
@shobhitdagur10863 ай бұрын
@@BrunoDias1234Do we have to be worried about opinion of CCP members using VPN
@madhubala79757 ай бұрын
India..with 85% hindus..during freedom...was made secular.. till now its secular. Pakistan with 85% muslims...was declared an islamic nation. Thats the difference. Islam wasnt born in pakistan..but pakistan is rightfully islamic nation. Hinduism was born in India..but India cannot built its own hindu temple which was demolished during islamic invasion! Wow. Hypocrisy at its peak
@osmanmohammed63047 ай бұрын
Islam Started Education!! Now Everyone importance of Edu. Arab oil rich countries changed the economy of all Asian countries!! That’s Gift of God Almighty!! Open Phenomenon!! Not Mysterious World!! Science unfolding many Facts!! No Divinity in Nature!! God Almighty Tests Mankind To Discover Unseen Allah/God. God Giver of all blessings!! Signs of God is everywhere!
@Ab-cj8bs7 ай бұрын
@@osmanmohammed6304yaa we know what your education teaches to create hamas isis alqaeda Taliban
@madhubala79757 ай бұрын
@@osmanmohammed6304 ur reply shows u dont have education. See indias history. When education started in india!!! Come on...this much of ignorance?!
@amanvi1237 ай бұрын
@@osmanmohammed6304 you r blinded by religion.
@bobrik3357 ай бұрын
Very Good Point.
@vineet4047 ай бұрын
Modi didn't built it, we the Hindu people built it with our donation 🙂
@shayanraj78407 ай бұрын
They need to hide that
@ASM-tl9xt7 ай бұрын
Yeah they said that in the video at 4:01
@anandmishra57967 ай бұрын
@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMAdesh sahi line mein hain , so please stop your propaganda , World bank ,IMF , S&P and other world institutions indian nhi aur na hi India ke influence mein data release karte hain aur unke prediction postive hain india ke future ko le ke so , 1000 problems hain india mein aur ham Indian usko solve kar lenge ,tum waha hindu , Muslims kar rahe ho baised tareeke se , jo Hindus ke against hue hain West Bengal mein usko nahi bol skte , jo muslims stone pelting karte hain , CAA anti-seculer hain but UCC anti-seculer hadd hoti hain dogalepana ki , Bangladesh, afganistan aur Pakistan ke minority ko citizenship dena national security ko khatra hain magar Rohingyas ko flat dena deshhit mein , so apne propoganda ko batti banao aur gaal lo
@SaurabhMishra-rv4dk7 ай бұрын
@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMAमुझे लगता है या तो आप दीमगा से खाली है या आप पक्का रवीश कुमार या ध्रुव राठी को सुनती है। दीदी असल में वही लोग आप जैसें लोगो का brain wash कर रहे हैं। वे लोग वामपंथी हैं और वे आप को डरा कर ही अपना अस्तित्व बचाते हैं।
@Madtitan.1237 ай бұрын
@@badluck5647No, 3 billion dollars are infra project's temple donation are different
@Aryan1_17 ай бұрын
Gov didn't spend a single penny. We donate for our temple.
@nazeerpasha20757 ай бұрын
Why in North India?
@Shaurya_Pant7 ай бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075 Because Ram was born in North India.
@ankursingh89637 ай бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075 because it's birth place for lord Rama
@OmnishKumar-y9s7 ай бұрын
Brother I think 1 rs is donated by government ❤❤❤❤❤
@nazeerpasha20757 ай бұрын
@cla782 yes, I know ‘Kauravas were test tube babies and Ravana had 24 types of aircrafts,’
@kartikshiroya22707 ай бұрын
Colonizers of America is giving lectures to other countries 😅😂
@amineboum94937 ай бұрын
yeah pagans
@PeaceKiller-gq4ft7 ай бұрын
@@amineboum9493 yeah barbaric abrahmic cults
@vinitagupta76707 ай бұрын
@@vampyrexxxit’s not pain. He is showing you the mirror
@vinitagupta76707 ай бұрын
British settlers became Americans and continued their colonisation, finished the Red Indian population
@kgaurav77 ай бұрын
Americans are not even from America 😅.
@carlbuzz90877 ай бұрын
•First, If Muslim don't follow secular credentials than why Hindu follow secularism ! •Second, During Islamic invasion of India many ancient temples were demolished and built arabic structures (mosque) on razed Hindu sits. Now Hindus are Reclaimed thier land from illegal occupation by legal system (court). •Third, Ayodhya is not Hindu vactican or Muslim makka or madina. Still u can find 170 mosques in Ayodhya & Court give separate land for new mosque construction as well. This is show highly tolerance in Hinduism & ancient Indian spirituality.
@jatinpareek45637 ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤
@aventikasaxena11977 ай бұрын
Ayodhya is a part of our culture, a base of our beliefs and holds a great place in our history. It is an emotion and much more than a Hindu Vatican. You're right.
@doublesman07 ай бұрын
Good to hear
@bartelgrant7 ай бұрын
1) you should always be the best example yourself rather than looking at others and then lowering yourself to their level 2) The Islamic conquest of India was so long ago. If every country were adjusting their borders or religions based on something that happened 500 years ago the world would be in a constant war. You really need to just let go, deal with history and just leave things as they are, rather than creating problems out of thin air. 3) if there were so much tolerance then there wouldn't be any anti-muslim riots we've seen so many times.
@jatinpareek45637 ай бұрын
@@bartelgrant you know what , just stay out of our internal matters,, inda is democracy we decide what we do ,, dont tell us about history ,, Westners lecturing indians on history is a joke ,, in ancient karma theory ,, every action has an equal and opposite reaction wether that action must have been done 1000 years ago ,, nature and god does not forget anything,, you have to pay what you have done ,, in this life or next life , u cant escape karma ,, what ever u see in present is the result of past ,, it is our responsibility to cure the historical problems so that our next generation will not suffer,, i hope u will understand.
@mahirshah46047 ай бұрын
Typical western commentary without mentioning archaeological evidences.
@Bittuji-oi3xe7 ай бұрын
What's your problem if we are developing a city to a advance stage
@granand7 ай бұрын
@@Bittuji-oi3xeI guess you meant this comment to be for the video
@@ripsanskrit3609 but they hide the truth also. It's called half truth and cherry picking to propagate your idea.
@padhlebhai137 ай бұрын
Govt. didn't paid for the temple, we made it via our donations😅
@googleGuy447 ай бұрын
No, the hundreds of engineers and architects did. The donors only provided the money
@pastaboiii33247 ай бұрын
Fr how stupid do they gotta be to be thinking that a government would build a religious institution with tax-payer money from a secular country. WSJ is not a reliable source at all 👎
@mk-rh5kt7 ай бұрын
Its possible because of PM Modi
@niftybank77 ай бұрын
@@googleGuy44without the money would they do it ?
@shouvik82677 ай бұрын
@@googleGuy44Their job is to build, they are doing their job. And they get paid for it, from donation money. Is that hard to understand?
@pk_88207 ай бұрын
Unlike Western countries, India is a civilizational state. Preserving and re-establishing the monuments of this ancient civilization is important for all Indians who don't identify with external invaders
@bartelgrant7 ай бұрын
At some point in history the Hindus themselves were the invaders of what is now India.
@darthvadeth62907 ай бұрын
As a KashmirI, we don't want to be Muslim or Hindu. We want freedom and independence. We don't want to be part of India or Pakistan. When India moved a million soldiers into Kashmir in 2019, there were many women and young girls in my village alone who were r@ped by the occupying Indian soldiers. We have heard similar things happening in neighboring villages and towns. I hope one day there will be justice, but India is so shamelessly imperialistic I doubt it will ever happen 😢 #FreeKashmir 🕊️
@sarthakgupta59307 ай бұрын
KASHMIR IS INDIA STOP CRYING@@darthvadeth6290
@pk_88207 ай бұрын
@@darthvadeth6290 what's the context here of your message?
@SimhaArya-zu7vo7 ай бұрын
@darthvadeth6290 झूठ। आपने घाटी के सभी हिंदुओं पर अत्याचार किया।
@liverightdieproud21897 ай бұрын
India didn't become secular in 1947. The word "secular" was forced into Constitution in 1973 by Congress govt for pleasing Muslims for votes.
@KurraAswini7 ай бұрын
Proud to be ur brother
@sriharshacv77607 ай бұрын
Indira Gandhi is one of the worst PMs India had.
@testprofile18407 ай бұрын
yes even our original constituion has ram ji's pic on it's front page
@The-Universe-Facts7 ай бұрын
#AndhaBhagat
@bullet49227 ай бұрын
@@testprofile1840does your book have stone pelt ers pictures
@SudhirSingh-mu2si7 ай бұрын
AYODHYA IS NOT VATICAN -- AYODHYA IS AYODHYA
@1Human1First17 ай бұрын
This is the superiority complex west has on east. Until they reached to loot India West did not even know to wear clothes, and these people have so much of supremacy complex on Africa and East Asians, who taught them how to live.
@pandurangasettyvenu78977 ай бұрын
Infact Vatican is christian ayodhya.
@varun22507 ай бұрын
@@pandurangasettyvenu7897Atluntadi manatoni 💪
@nazeerpasha20758 күн бұрын
The Angkor temple in Cambodia is more magnificent than any temples in India with gods of Indian mythology. All primitive cultures had their gods based on mythological beliefs represented in the form of idols with names and attributes. The Aztecs, Mayas, Egyptians , Greek , Mesopotamia , Siam, Polynesia and Easter islands etc. What is the difference between those idols and the idols worshiped by Indian Hindus? Will the Indian Hindus living in those countries worship those local idols? What is the difference between those idols and the idols of Hindus?
@f5rwall7 ай бұрын
A Vatican or Mecca can exist, but Ayodhya is controversial 😅
@asingh76087 ай бұрын
So true 🤣🤪
@king-bw7zm7 ай бұрын
Are sab paise ka khel hai Babu bhaiya 😂😂😂
@sooriapragass10887 ай бұрын
Made controversial by mugals and present day mugals
@badluck56477 ай бұрын
Ayodhya and Dome of the Rock are controversial for building on top of another's holy site. The Vatican and Mecca don't do that.
@Natanyahu7 ай бұрын
@@badluck5647 Meanwhile Muhammad after breaking 365 idols of Mecca : We Are Peacefool Riligion Saaarrr
@InstrumentOfGOD-77 ай бұрын
Where is archaeological evidence submitted by Archaeological survey of India in supreme court?? Did u mention about pillars and temple remains found in excavation? Another thing, Temple was funded by public through door to door collection and via online payments from all over India. No Govt money has been invested in it. Despite knowing It was place of temple and mosque was built on demolition of temple... Still we gave Muslims 5 acre of land in same City to built mosque. Ask them are they doing the same in Pakistan, Bangladesh or Afghanistan??
@akhripasta26707 ай бұрын
Half of the mosque money is also being donated by Hindu Devotees
@gt1223887 ай бұрын
At least jews will feel safe in India compared to America.
@isleephungry7 ай бұрын
Apart from cows no one is safe in India😂
@gt1223887 ай бұрын
@@isleephungry your mom would be safe as well :)
@whysoserious75537 ай бұрын
@@isleephungryabdul from beggarstan 🇵🇰🥣
@siddharthverma12497 ай бұрын
@@isleephungrygoats are safe too Abdul, do not panic
@Dr.SyedSaifAbbasNaqvi7 ай бұрын
@@isleephungry Allah ❌ Hoor supplier ✔️ Mohammad Rasulullah ❌ Baccha Baz ✔️
@venkatakrishnakotra7 ай бұрын
It is not belief. It is fact that kings in 1500 demolished ram temple. Don't play it down please.
@osmanmohammed63047 ай бұрын
Valmiki Wrote Story Ram as Hero !!! What’s Historic fact!! Many Philosophies People Believe, Islam Started Education, Now Science Unfolding Facts !! Greatness of Allah/God Almighty !! World & Universe Mind Boggling Facts Science Unfolding!! Signs of God Everywhere!! On Earth Tiny Earth Planet God Tests Mankind To Discover Unseen Allah/God Almighty.. Creature like Humans Enjoying & Thrilling Experiences Discovering God.
@prakashkr22147 ай бұрын
@@osmanmohammed6304its a fact that the temple existed before Babar demolished it.. I m atheist, Ram is fictional but it plays an important role in Indian civilization and tourism.. & India was never a secular country.. Its a Muslim country gives all the preference by religion, which is antithesis f secularism.
@deepx86797 ай бұрын
@@osmanmohammed6304Roses are red and sky is blue she was 9 while he was 52
@AnjaliD-nb7cr7 ай бұрын
@@osmanmohammed6304sun revolves around earth , earth is flat .
@nazeerpasha20757 ай бұрын
@@AnjaliD-nb7cr In 2014, our Prime Minister said the fact Karan was born from Kunti’s ear is proof that genetic science was known at the time. He added the fact Ganesh has an elephant head is proof there were plastic surgeons in those days.
@GyanPrakash7 ай бұрын
Christian - Vatican, Jews - Jerusalem, Muslims - Mecca Hindu - Oh, we are SECULAR, if we build our Temple, "Minorities" will get Offended 🤗
@omniyambot98767 ай бұрын
only catholics are to vatican
@ntarctica7 ай бұрын
Al Jazeera, WSJ, BBC s not Muslims
@badluck56477 ай бұрын
Because there is no controversy on holy sites in Jerusalem?
@artman127 ай бұрын
@@ntarctica They still follow the ji hadi thought
@rohitprajapati97207 ай бұрын
@@y57575 lol jokes on palestinian who kicked out from jerusalem..
@oopsididitagain85727 ай бұрын
Vatican City got nothing with Jesus Christ. But Lord Ram was born on Ayodhya.
@ashashraa65795 ай бұрын
You don't have to insult other people's religion in order to validate yours.
@oopsididitagain85725 ай бұрын
@@ashashraa6579 I didn’t insult anyone. Point out exactly where? Just saying facts
@baroguesirohige12024 ай бұрын
"But lord Ram was born" so ram Human or God ???
@Cryspio4 ай бұрын
@@baroguesirohige1202he was an avatar of vishnu. He was born as a human to kill Ravan
@oopsididitagain85723 ай бұрын
@@baroguesirohige1202 The avathar Ram was born as a human.
@chaksh7 ай бұрын
India cannot be a Hindu nation but Kashmir can be a Muslim territory. There is no problem in that contradictions
@rvind0007 ай бұрын
Even tho 'Hindu' itself orignally is a geographically term used by persians & beyond, originating from 'Sapt Sindhu', land of the 7 rivers.
@deenvadh41997 ай бұрын
@@rvind000 So we can't choose to own it? What's the problem with that? I think it's great that the land is the basis of civilizational identity - for all indigenous Dharmic philosophies to identify with the name of the land, in harmony. No?
@akhripasta26707 ай бұрын
@rvind000 The term is not Persian. It's a corrupted Sanskrit term. Sapta Sindhu is also a Sanskrit term.
@darthvadeth62907 ай бұрын
As a KashmirI, we don't want to be Muslim or Hindu. We want freedom and independence. We don't want to be part of India or Pakistan. When India moved a million soldiers into Kashmir in 2019, there were many women and young girls in my village alone who were r@ped by the occupying Indian soldiers. We have heard similar things happening in neighboring villages and towns. I hope one day there will be justice, but India is so shamelessly imperialistic I doubt it will ever happen 😢 #FreeKashmir 🕊️
@sarthakgupta59307 ай бұрын
@@rvind000Persia was not muslim back then
@BMJSardar85417 ай бұрын
I am not a HINDU but i want ask you about something....When Vivek Ramaswamy was asked about his Religion in Media and People were discussing not to vote him because he is not Christian and he should be converted to get votes....and we all know why he lost...How beautiful and secular was that and these people are talking about secularism 😂😂😂😂 Hypocrisy ki bhi seema hoti h...par western media ke propoganda ki toh seema, rekha, jaya aur sushma bhi hoti hai 😜😜😜😜
@greymatter94007 ай бұрын
Oh yaa because he was hindu thats y he lost ofc
@Shawn_mike347 ай бұрын
USA is doomed anyway.
@Wanderer-KN7 ай бұрын
They think Our Agenda our agenda your agenda is Against human rights
@shashwatkumaratul18867 ай бұрын
@@Wcheqkxieqqceeqaewruwabecauuse they dont vote or join any national party and also we have dynastic Gandhi family and they continue to lunch theirs family members
@mayurharge23397 ай бұрын
@@Wcheqkxieqqceeqaewruwa wait for your carasmatic leader shri annamalai in next 20 years will definitely be the prime minister
@padhlebhai137 ай бұрын
Mecca - Not controversial Ayodhya - Controversial
@JacobMoretti-NotABot7 ай бұрын
Yes because India is a democracy, unlike Saudi Arabia which is an autocratic state.
@atharvatar7 ай бұрын
@@JacobMoretti-NotABot that is such a dumb reason. It can be controversial for the opposition parties, but third parties should be neutral.
@JacobMoretti-NotABot7 ай бұрын
@@atharvatar it’s super interesting to watch the dynamics in the comments section lol
@phaneeshkashyap23487 ай бұрын
@@JacobMoretti-NotABotthe place of religious worship is not secular by definition genius 😂.
@JacobMoretti-NotABot7 ай бұрын
@@atharvatar what I understand the original post to be saying is that it’s strange that Mecca is not controversial but Ayodhya is. Am I understanding the original post incorrectly?
@dharmverma75957 ай бұрын
Hindus don’t just claim that there was a temple at the site of mosque but abundantly proved that there was a temple dedicated to Bhagwan Ram. Stop this biased bull sh’ t.
@ASeeker-99997 ай бұрын
Why do all western media conveniently not mention that Supreme Court gave the 2.7 acre disputed land to Hindus to build their temple and the same ruling also gave a prominent 5 acre land to Muslims to build their mosque. Temple main building is done but will take another 2 years to complete. Meanwhile even the mosque in Ayodya called the Mohammad bin Abdullah mosque will complete as well. It will be the biggest mosque in India n will hold the largest Quran in the world. Imam of Mecca will be coming to do the first prayers. If this is not secularism then what is?? Can you imagine a temple or a mosque being built in Vatican holy city or a church or temple being built in the holy city of Mecca?? Only Hindus will accept this because they are just happy that the Supreme Court gave them the 2.7acre holy site back based on archeological evidence and ancient traveller documents.
@harshgangwar90557 ай бұрын
pathetic to see WSJ's biased and racist journalism
@humbleindian63037 ай бұрын
Please make US and Britain secular , only 2% of your population comprises of minority religions
@JacobMoretti-NotABot7 ай бұрын
How is it biased?
@jaig7 ай бұрын
@@JacobMoretti-NotABot WSJ is all about ROI.
@NEPALI-NINJA7 ай бұрын
How is it racist can you explain Lindu?
@aksin51787 ай бұрын
@@NEPALI-NINJA asli ID se aa abdullah
@TheFirstPMofINDIA7 ай бұрын
Western Propoganda & Jealousy 🤡
@usaanthems12957 ай бұрын
Yeah sure. We are so jealous of your slums.
@Hummus-se3xy7 ай бұрын
@@usaanthems1295western hypocrisy
@dragoon142707 ай бұрын
@@usaanthems1295 at least our house is not made up of material which can break easily on punching
@Tsarthak7 ай бұрын
@@usaanthems1295 20 year old propaganda is still on your mind. do your country have UPI
@yashnigam67 ай бұрын
Nobody in the west cares about India or is jealous of India 🤣. Also, your icon is of Bill Gates, so you think about the west far more than the west thinks for you.
@Seriouslyfunny17 ай бұрын
Jerusalem is for Christians what Ayodhya is for Hindus. To oversimplify it. Yeah, same story. Some people from middle east invaded, tore down the historical structures and institutions, installed their own symbols and claimed it their own.
@atukurumanoj58737 ай бұрын
Man …Western media really can’t tolerate India developing and prospering 😅…
@Fgma7447 ай бұрын
Bruh what?
@Wanderer-KN7 ай бұрын
Their mind is Bhot ajib I cant explain its like dunia mc thi hai aur rahegi they think what they are thinking is only correct
@nareshsinghal23277 ай бұрын
True
@Aniket27127 ай бұрын
you saying this ... makes you as worst as western media also, you call this development? a stupid temple?
@atukurumanoj58737 ай бұрын
@@Aniket2712 my comment doesn’t reflect just this video ….even when India succeeded in its moon mission to space ..this same channel reported saying …they can’t feed their poor but got money for space missions..again you would probably reply with stupid mission….and when it comes to Ram temple …anyone with common sense …will realise that economic boost(tourism , travel, hotels , restaurants, infra to accommodate it etc) the city of Ayodhya will get in short span of time …. The live example of it …was city of Tirupati…..the Balaji temple in Tirupati made it world class religious tourism destination….the infrastructure in Tirupati was world class compared with similar cities in AP …the important fact here was the infrastructure was developed (in Tirupati) using temple revenue…you can google it …so its basic common sense ….anyway y would you see all these cascading effects when your eyes are blinded with religious hate🤦🏾
@sakshamsingh91227 ай бұрын
Cry Western Media! Cry
@abhijeetsingh13067 ай бұрын
😂🤣🤣😂exactly
@Yourking6457 ай бұрын
@@stereomachine ohh don't be sad child 😂😂
@phoenixj12997 ай бұрын
@@stereomachinethis video shows that your kind is screaming.
@rupeshagarwal58967 ай бұрын
@@3limabeanplease dont come
@PankajPassi-vs9td7 ай бұрын
@@3limabeanhaha ok NAMAZI pappu
@tivo37207 ай бұрын
Its our land... Not your ... We gave muslims two part of our land... Pakistan and Bangladesh. India is Hindu. Our land our culture our temples.
@nazeerpasha20757 ай бұрын
What do you mean by being a Hindu?
@mayurpatil89187 ай бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075 Sanatani.
@hitchcock86537 ай бұрын
What about other people who don't follow Hinduism. India is a secular country.not Hindu nor any religious. these toxic thoughts in your mind is the victory of BJP where religion is used to gain the majority support from people and rule (destroy) our country. Just like the British did in past days
@msdolly61019817 ай бұрын
@@hitchcock8653: India was is and will always be birth place of sanatan. All the 4 dharmic religions were born here. Indira Gandhi under emergency added the word secular in our constitution. If India is secular first bring UCC. Also secular doesn't mean destroying the heritage of the land. Abrahamic religion don't belong to Indian subcontinent, they came from outside. Constitution has given all citizens the freedom to follow any religion, that doesn't mean roots and civilization of India will be destroyed. Just like Vatican, Bethlehem, mecca madina exist as birth place of those religion, India exist as birth place of all dharmic religions.
@AsterRays79797 ай бұрын
@@hitchcock8653 india is secular bcoz Hindus are secular, you should go to your Pakistan & Bangladesh if you have problem
@rahultalsaniya42497 ай бұрын
Initially Temple was demolished and mosque was built
@CPTE50696 ай бұрын
Past crimes offer no justification for future ones.
@ankitverma9956 ай бұрын
@@CPTE5069 first of all what is the definition of crime for you and what is the crime over there
@CPTE50696 ай бұрын
@@ankitverma995 The crime of desecrating one holy place does not justify the crime of desecrating another. Desecrating the former mosque to build a hindu temple is just as bad as the Mughals desecrating the temple that stood there 300 something years ago to build a mosque. Both are heinous crimes and neither is validated.
@ankitverma9956 ай бұрын
there were thousands of temples which were demolished to make a mosque but it is still a mosque but this place was the birthplace of Lord Ram, just as Kaaba is for Muslims, similarly it is for us it's just not a temple first of all
@ankitverma9956 ай бұрын
@@CPTE5069 there were thousand temples which were demolished to make a mosque in Mughal era but all of them are still a mosque
@riderdev98557 ай бұрын
We built it with our own contribution not govt 😂
@rangoman18157 ай бұрын
No Ambani's lapdog Modi used tax payers money
@manishgurav23697 ай бұрын
Before Ram mandir, Modi govt built 262 medical colleges, 15 AIIMS, 6 IIT, 16 IIIT, 7 IIM, 4 crores houses for poor, free treatment for 6 crores poor, 11 crores tap connections, metro in 11 cities, 60000 km highways, 37000 km railway lines, 75 Airports & 10000 Jan Aushadhi Kendra
@isleephungry7 ай бұрын
and gives 5 kilos of free monthly rations for the poor😂
@manishgurav23697 ай бұрын
@@isleephungry of course it's necessary to support population whom coming out of poverty.
@manishgurav23697 ай бұрын
@@isleephungry 80 crore people get free ration, hindi, muslim, all religion without discrimination.
@Lakshyam97 ай бұрын
But NOT VISIBLE to WSJ and its STOOGES
@moonknight35947 ай бұрын
@@isleephungryfun fact no West will tell u that ! Muslim people's got bigger double the size of LANd in Same region to build there own new mosque ! Hindu's collected successfully over 200 million $ ! Also money from Hindu group donated son share to Muslim mosque ! WORk mosque going on ! From saudi Some imams got invited and first brick of that mosque is imported from mecca but hey this all do not suit western narrative😂 so u will not see all this in news 😂
@gameslive19907 ай бұрын
Western Media crying. Ram Mandir is helping Indian economy. Average daily visitors is 100000 to 150000.
@shreyash20067 ай бұрын
@adolft_officialproud of mecca build by Chinese cranes and the walls of masjid al haram 😂
@mohammedfurniturewala29507 ай бұрын
You said same when the question was asked about the reason for building a ₹3000 cr. Statue of Sardar Vallabh bhai Patel.😂
@Eleku7 ай бұрын
Religion is not helping the economy. Religion is stupid.
@NavinShah-nk1tv7 ай бұрын
@@mohammedfurniturewala2950are you from BHIKARISTAN or PORKISTAN
@AaryanFowl-uq1li7 ай бұрын
That’s how the international market works
@princegoyat29947 ай бұрын
Using ' mostly muslims' is a must thing in western reports.
@darthvadeth62907 ай бұрын
As a KashmirI, we don't want to be Muslim or Hindu. We want freedom and independence. We don't want to be part of India or Pakistan. When India moved a million soldiers into Kashmir in 2019, there were many women and young girls in my village alone who were r@ped by the occupying Indian soldiers. We have heard similar things happening in neighboring villages and towns. I hope one day there will be justice, but India is so shamelessly imperialistic I doubt it will ever happen 😢 #FreeKashmir 🕊️
@SimhaArya-zu7vo7 ай бұрын
@darthvadeth6290 झूठ। आपने घाटी के सभी हिंदुओं पर अत्याचार किया।
@realnapster15227 ай бұрын
Doesn’t matter if it’s Muslim or Hindu. Kashmir, Pakistan and even Bangladesh belongs to India. Nepal and Sri Lanka too.
@hiicyuivbi7 ай бұрын
@@darthvadeth6290kashmir ka location hi aisa hai ki kabhi independent nhi ho sakta,kabhi koi bhi ke lega
@realnapster15227 ай бұрын
@@darthvadeth6290 you are not a Kashmiri 😅
@SaikatSadhukha7 ай бұрын
For Christian Vatican is OK For Muslim Mekkah is OK But for us Hindus Ayodhya is controversial 😂😂😂😂😂😂 Who the fukc give u permission to make a video about our Holy Place Ayodhya #JoyShreeRam 🙏🙏
@niht92407 ай бұрын
For this biased media 📰: It's acceptable that Muslim Mecca stands, despite the site originally being an ancient polytheistic temple that was razed and demolished by Muhammad, who then built a mosque over it. Yet, they don't point out any controversy or unfairness here.However, they don't have the guts to raise any questions about it, knowing well that they could face severe repercussions, including blasphemy accusations, the very next day. On the other hand, when Hindus reclaimed their temple site, where the Babri Mosque had been constructed by demolishing one of the most sacred Hindu temples by the Mughal Terrorist Babur, it is suddenly deemed controversial. Wow! What type of journalism is this LOL
@user-hf4jz8uj5n7 ай бұрын
Ram isn't going to give us jobs. He is as real as superman, as real as Spiderman. Also, ram left his wife Sita after he won the fight against ravana
@jameschristophercirujano66507 ай бұрын
It's called freedom of speech, much like how you can associate Vatican for Christianity, Vatican is only for Catholics, the other Christian sects have different central places of worship. You're wrong, but you're free to talk BS. You also have to remember WSJ has liberal western values, us in Asia are generally more conservative, so having religion as part of our culture, and politics, isn't exactly as frowned upon, as it is over in the West.
@χσχσ-ν3χ7 ай бұрын
@@jameschristophercirujano6650 rice bag rant
@asianman72327 ай бұрын
@@jameschristophercirujano6650leave these opiod addicts alone
@brijeshgada79797 ай бұрын
Anti-India Propaganda showing its color
@sowmitriswamy67187 ай бұрын
Being Indian, why is this anti-Indian. The temple is built, but the Hindutva movement is not done as yet and we do not know whether it will breed an attitude of intolerance (like Pakistan is today) or simply be uniting Hindus and remaking their religious practices common to all Hindus. The latter is welcome, the former is not.
@krishnaa95717 ай бұрын
@@sowmitriswamy6718 Hindutva stands for casteless society and uniting all Hindus!
@igniterook7 ай бұрын
@@sowmitriswamy6718both sides claim outrage.
@amateur_football97517 ай бұрын
@@sowmitriswamy6718Easy, he is a Modi fanboy!!
@AdityaRai-d4z7 ай бұрын
They are just crying of jealousy 😭
@maanooj7 ай бұрын
I miss those days where dislike count of youtube video is visible
@sushobhandas-eg1st7 ай бұрын
Me tooo😅
@ramirosotto7 ай бұрын
3,3k likes, 5,2k dislikes. You're welcome.
@pratyushsaxena98917 ай бұрын
@@ramirosotto thanks mate
@joydipbera86657 ай бұрын
you can download an extention
@farrightsocialistatheist8457 ай бұрын
3.8 Likes, 6 Million Dislikes
@modernpronationalistharshg86477 ай бұрын
Hinduism Sanatan and India 🇮🇳 Grows Together
@Krishnadevaraya17 ай бұрын
You don't have any mind to call ayodhya as hindu Vatican
@avinashg49747 ай бұрын
Oh sry, Hindu Vatican over Babar musjid over Hindu temple over dead fossils over something more over earth
@Blah8887 ай бұрын
that's what you call a colonized mind
@unitycatalog7 ай бұрын
Cope
@plusultra72587 ай бұрын
@@unitycatalog sorry no one copes to propaganda XD
@plusultra72587 ай бұрын
@@avinashg4974 Atheism is welcomed in Hinduism as well btw. So don't think it will irk anyone here.
@Anilsharma123647 ай бұрын
Why is it controversial for a Hindu Country to have a strong Hindu presence? I think this is racism to suggest we can’t have anything good.
@neodenz7 ай бұрын
That isn't what's wrong here. The BJP is just pushing out all other religions, and putting Hinduism in the forefront. Other religious minorities also exist and have existed for thousands of years.
@Anilsharma123647 ай бұрын
@@neodenzI see nothing wrong with Hinduism being prominent in India as of not India, where will hindusm be prominent?
@alphacompany48377 ай бұрын
Secular country *
@Anilsharma123647 ай бұрын
@@alphacompany4837 as mandated by who?
@neodenz7 ай бұрын
@@Anilsharma12364 Hinduism is in the majority, fine. But it doesn't mean that it should be treated like the state religion! Other religions are as important as hinduism. And India is for all. Not just Hindus
@badlav1207 ай бұрын
What video is about : Modi Poltics Babri masjid Temple construction And politics What they didn't tell you Archeological survey Historical facts Hindus struggle for the temple Supreme court judgement on The basis of archeological excavations . EXCEPTIONAL JOURNALISM 👏👏
@rohitprajapati97207 ай бұрын
just want to spread their propoganda... we should report them ...
@vishakhasharma22097 ай бұрын
Short and sweet 👍
@alphacapital24257 ай бұрын
*This comment must be most liked!*
@samuraijack13717 ай бұрын
the journalists are third rate! what can you expect out of them? third rate journalism
@suman-77 ай бұрын
One side story and purely baised and hate against Hindu
@RandomExplorationsIN7 ай бұрын
Mosque was not built on ruins of temple. But on a intact temple.
@Mr.-AJ7 ай бұрын
Supreme Court Don’t believe so.
@RandomExplorationsIN7 ай бұрын
@@Mr.-AJ we all know the truth.
@Mr.-AJ7 ай бұрын
@@RandomExplorationsIN No you don't know, you "just believe", doubt whether you actually believe; It is only because of Muslim hatred that you are happy with this act. You know I know!
@RandomExplorationsIN7 ай бұрын
@@Mr.-AJ there is no muslim hatred. Is gyanwapi built on temple ruins and one might wonder why would u build a mosque on temple pillars right?
@Mr.-AJ7 ай бұрын
@@RandomExplorationsIN We were talking about Babri Masjid; Gnanabapi can be discussed another day. State where the Supreme Court judgment refers to "credible evidence" instead of "belief". Nowhere; Then it is nothing but foolishness to continue discussing with you.
@SachinSharma-wn9od7 ай бұрын
LOL 🤣😂 someone sitting in USA is educating world about Ayodhya. Using some India expert nobody knows about.
@artman127 ай бұрын
These yt imperialists still continuing the British propaganda tradition
@amateur_football97517 ай бұрын
Typical reaction of Modi fanboys who are so insecure, they can't stand any criticism to their god like leader!! Modi is a Hindu supremacist!!
@saurabhade10797 ай бұрын
He is known communist known all over Indian circle.
@nazeerpasha20757 ай бұрын
Mythology getting debunked.
@flyingflowers18897 ай бұрын
Unboxing when ?@@nazeerpasha2075
@Sunil135937 ай бұрын
Modi didn't put any money. It was the donation from us Hindus
@ggunbrdoon7 ай бұрын
What about 100 of hindu temple demolished in pakastan and Bangladesh no one will speak word about it 🥵🤬🤬🤬
@yrd0077 ай бұрын
Its not Indias vatican, vatican is theirs ayodhya.😎
@Wanderer-KN7 ай бұрын
Ge baat 😏💪
@nirav6677 ай бұрын
Western media has no idea
@gauravsing89457 ай бұрын
We Indians hate appeasement secularism..
@amangupta29057 ай бұрын
@NotAbhaiiibyeeeeveryone hates that here
@yogidhamijakonde7 ай бұрын
👍
@Dr.SyedSaifAbbasNaqvi7 ай бұрын
@NotAbhaiiibyeee We do too. A lot of people wouldn't say it on your face but will show you when the election results are out.
@piyushkumar70637 ай бұрын
Only hindu rastra
@piyushkumar70637 ай бұрын
@NotAbhaiiibyeee yes we make in your home also🤣
@maruthinara66047 ай бұрын
We Hindu donated the money, government did not spent a single rupee.
@randomnobody87706 ай бұрын
As the video made clear, the govt invested money in infrastructure which will be made up with tax revenue. As a westerner and massive fan of incredible India, this comment section is disappointing. Its illogical ranting, conspiratorial lunacy, ahistorical victim mentality, nationalistic craziness. From Kashmir to Nagaland you guys all have to get along and not urinate in fear every time a foreign media reports on something. India has such a great spirit, but this victim mentality, crab mentality, nationalistic and sectarian mentality is holding back the positive energy and capability of its people.
@rvharikrishna7 ай бұрын
I'm cancelling my WSJ subscription. They're not what they used to be. Poor woke journalism, what a shame.
@kenster82707 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for letting us all know about your subscription changes. Please do keep us updated of any future changes to your viewing settings, as such information is downright CRUCIAL to us.
@Lakshyam97 ай бұрын
@@kenster8270 Are you from WSJ? Then why triggered ???? 😅😂
@moonknight35947 ай бұрын
@@kenster8270fun fact no West will tell u that ! Muslim people's got bigger double the size of LANd in Same region to build there own new mosque ! Hindu's collected successfully over 200 million $ ! Also money from Hindu group donated son share to Muslim mosque ! WORk mosque going on ! From saudi Some imams got invited and first brick of that mosque is imported from mecca but hey this all do not suit western narrative😂 so u will not see all this in news 😂
@deborajdutta9387 ай бұрын
@@kenster8270 Womp womp
@everythingisfine99887 ай бұрын
I'm not a fan of woke stuff, but if your going to state that then attach a time index showing where wokeness is being promoted
@jayasaiification7 ай бұрын
Beta Ayodhya is centuries older than Vatican..
@pritech83027 ай бұрын
well said
@Eleku7 ай бұрын
The City of Rome was founded thousands of years ago.
@nazeerpasha20757 ай бұрын
Historical proof or just a myth?
@googleGuy447 ай бұрын
So, what? The use of "Vatican" was only meant to make non-indian audience relate to the significance of Ayodhya.
@jayasaiification7 ай бұрын
@@googleGuy44 doesn't matter let others learn about indian terms.. have you ever seen you mentioning "Bible is a GITA of Christians ' no right. So Even for your regular use we used to follow British. Start using something of your own ler others know about you. Then they will respect you.
@MaheshKumar-iw2hf7 ай бұрын
7 min video and not a single mention of asi survey and temple remains found there.good way of portraying things one sided
@Deb_deCoder7 ай бұрын
WSJ doesn't care about facts.. they talk for whoever gives them money
@sriharshacv77607 ай бұрын
Because mentioning the survey doesn't fit their narrative.
@mohitrathi38487 ай бұрын
This is not controversial.....its our history ...jai shree ram
@ZakiAkmal-m8v2 ай бұрын
This is the result of political history to divide the society
@praveenchandrakosaraju59317 ай бұрын
Don’t lie modi is not throwing money. It is money that people donated
@manishgurav23697 ай бұрын
Muslim refusal to return Hindus destroyed sacred sites didn’t destroy the idea of India But a saffron flag in your residential society didThen good riddance to that idea of India
@endofworld2007 ай бұрын
In Court it dnt prove it was hindu temple
@Remusseveruspottah7 ай бұрын
@@endofworld200clearly you haven’t been educated. It was built on a temple as deduced by various archeological evidences presented by KK muhammmad. The SC said, I quote “ it has been built on a site ( temple).” Ayodhya’s history has been painted by birth of this Hindu god. Stop lying here, nobody believes you.
@kaushalkishorerocker7 ай бұрын
@@endofworld200what a bigot are you read the supreme court judgement and the enclosed proofs of Ram temple by asi .
@manishgurav23697 ай бұрын
@@endofworld200 read the full verdict of Supreme Court..... Five judges of the Supreme Court on Saturday ruled in favour of Ram Lalla, which represents the child deity and held that a temple should be built at the Ayodhya site by a government-run trust. The 929-page unanimous judgment, which analysed the claims in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute case, held title cannot be established on the basis of faith and belief.
@endofworld2007 ай бұрын
@@manishgurav2369 On page 215 the ruling says, “It is true that in matters of faith and belief, the absence of evidence may not be an evidence of absence.” This means that irrespective of whether there is an evidence or not, matters of faith have to be upheld. By implication, the court has ruled that matters of faith can prevail over other concerns, even more strongly if aggressive public opinion supports it...
@tivo37207 ай бұрын
Indian govt take millions of rupees from only the Hindu temples. In India only Hindu temples pay taxes others don't. So it should be Govt first priority to develop and beautify our Hindu temples, cities and places. Bcz only Hindu temples are paying taxes. Other's not.
@Defenseshorts-vv2il7 ай бұрын
Don't interfere in India's internal matter if u don't have proper knowledge about it it's not developed by modi it's developed by Hindus
@akshayparab17 ай бұрын
uneducated journalism at its best.
@nileshparab81357 ай бұрын
I agree. I have reported the video under misleading/ misinformation.
@neodenz7 ай бұрын
Uneducated? They are speaking straight facts. Get your minds out of the propoganda lake
@rudraagarwal64027 ай бұрын
Bro from where it isnt showing the option to report anywhere@@nileshparab8135
@y575757 ай бұрын
WSJ the gang of propoganda 😂
@Ati-Maharathi7 ай бұрын
You can call them 'presstitutes'.😂
@swathysudarsanan24697 ай бұрын
What about pro Palestine protest in US universities? You have enough time to understand the reality of peace community 😂
@theblueplanet35767 ай бұрын
It was built with 3000 crores ie. ~500 million$. With devotees donations. What a shoddy research 🤦♂️
@_caspian_44747 ай бұрын
America is a third world country with a lot of money.😂 - someone
@bethechange19457 ай бұрын
vatican - Ayodhya for christians mecca - Mathura for muslims china - Kashi for atheists
@SuhbanIo7 ай бұрын
brainrot
@soragaming36537 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@PZier7 ай бұрын
Don't compare Vatican to something 😡
@PZier7 ай бұрын
@@prathameshsur6806 Bro when did Jesus said hallelujah 😅.
@PZier7 ай бұрын
@@prathameshsur6806 isn't he the one who left a pregnant woman in the forest. 🥲
@parimaladeepak43397 ай бұрын
Ayodhya is older than Vatican! JAI SHRI RAM! JAI HIND! JAI BHARAT!
@pritech83027 ай бұрын
Its much much older than vatican ... Jai Shree Ram
@nazeerpasha20757 ай бұрын
Why does Ramayana have different versions? Which version is authentic?
@mohit77627 ай бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075because there are multiverses in which ramayana happened by different means in different time only kakbhasundi seen all of that
@msdadsfsx7 ай бұрын
ayodhya is 3 billion years old
@Mahan_SatyaSanatan7 ай бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075valmiki ramayan
@popup1717 ай бұрын
Why WSJ didn't mentioned that Muslims were given 360 million to build a new mosque near the Ram Temple in Ayodhya.
@sriharshacv77607 ай бұрын
That is because mentioning about the settlement weakens their anti-India narrative. They conveniently omitted it. Many in America are also disgusted by this channel / newspaper for their heavy ideological bias.
@Sarvarogahara7 ай бұрын
2:50 Dunno what kind of research work you guys have done. India was never a secular republic. The term SECULARISM has been forcefully added by Congress Prime minister indiira Gandhi after bringing emergency. Correct your facts
@Itsvishalsingh_7 ай бұрын
Don't compare it to Vatican, there are many Vaticans in India which are much older than Vatican. We have built this through our 500 years of hard work; the government has not spent any money on it.
@manishgurav23697 ай бұрын
-It was #RamJanmbhoomi -There was a #RamMandir at that place -Mughals demolished it & built a mosque over the same pillars -Hindus demolished it & RECLAIMED the Janmabhoomi -We built a grand Mandir at that place Now you call it Hindu supremacy, communalism, anti democracy, Lahsoon or whatever you want to, the temple has been built & nobody can touch it now.. The cycle is complete here & now it's time for Krishna Janmabhoomi & Gyanvapi...
@notKhalid7 ай бұрын
😂here they come
@amanvi1237 ай бұрын
@@notKhalidcry
@simriths.s59767 ай бұрын
@@notKhalid Madrasachap
@simriths.s59767 ай бұрын
@@notKhalid It has been narrated that [Imam] Ja`far Ibn Muhamad said: “Prophet Muhammad (p.b.u.h) used to put his face between the breasts of [his daughter] Fatimah (as) before going to sleep." (Bihaar al-Anwar, vol. 43, p. 78).
@KeithBarnesLife7 ай бұрын
This is exactly what the video said. . .
@RW91117 ай бұрын
Ayodhya existed long before the said comparable city was ever conceived.
@nazeerpasha20757 ай бұрын
Myth or Reality ?
@OptiMus_PrimE...p7 ай бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075 reality we r not Allah follower who doesn't have shape
@genesis9chaos6 ай бұрын
It's not a just a claim that Babri Majid was built over a Temple, it has been proven by scientific archeological facts. The mosque was built over destroyed Hindu temple by Babar's army. Indians have struggled for the same since then and the legal battle has been on since 1822. Every party has tried dealing with this like a hot potato and the 1992 incident forced the legal settlement. Further, BJP does not want a Hindu country, its only wants a parity with other religions in India. The law books of India clearly discriminate against is majority religion (e.g. no freedom to control its own places of worship or trusts to use the funds donated to places of worship with government dictating how it should be spent; or only Hindu places of worship being forces to share significant parts of its funds with the government and not use for the betterment of the community at large. Most Hindu religious organizations run schools/collages, hospitals and free food programs with the leftover funds only, which is a very small percentage of total).
@Papa101267 ай бұрын
Dumb news channel...why are u calling it hindu vatican ,when it is called ram temple in ayodhya
@neodenz7 ай бұрын
It is just a comparison. If you get offended by that, then don't watch this
@Jojo_KokoUK7 ай бұрын
Modi will Lead India to H3LL😂😂😂😂😂😂
@gautaminandi55727 ай бұрын
@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMASo you believe what Babur did to Ram mandir(which was the holiest place for hindus) years ago and killed them is justified but when we take our holy lands back we get called intolerant.
@Vitamin_NOOT7 ай бұрын
It is for white people to understand better. That this temple is not just any temple but holds very high importance.
@neodenz7 ай бұрын
@@Vitamin_NOOT So did the mosque that was built upon
@brmahadev49167 ай бұрын
Turkey did it same thing why isn't that a big issue 😂
@agilephilosopher7 ай бұрын
Probably because the biased WSJ reporters producing this video has a Turkish spouse 🙂
@fredyflinstone95227 ай бұрын
@@agilephilosopheralso super woke
@ShivaYadav-uu7rl7 ай бұрын
They didn't did the same thing . We fight 500 years for it we fought in COURT . .. they never did it ..
@DEEPAK-JOC7 ай бұрын
I'm unsubscribing this Anti Hindu and anti India propoganda machine. 😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
@batosato7 ай бұрын
🤣 truth is bitter
@notKhalid7 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@sarath_babu7 ай бұрын
@@batosato tell me the truth, then
@ekesshtks7 ай бұрын
If possible please tweet this mentioning @NilanjanUdwin
@Dr.SyedSaifAbbasNaqvi7 ай бұрын
@@batosato Without lust Islam is dust. More like it
@ybrengade8027 ай бұрын
Not only one mosque but more than one mosque built Hindu, Jain and Buddhist temples and worship places in India. Muslim religion comes to India as Invaders looting Golds, Diamonds, Demolition Infrastructure and temple, raping other religion woman's as possible as and the force conversion to Muslim from non Muslim. wherever force conversion of religion and demolition of worship places happened there is tension between this religions. Also Archeological and historians had found evidence of Mosque Built on Ram mandir. Like wise Mosque built on Cristian and Jewish religions worship place Solomon Temple in meddle east like in Israel.
@shubhamjain94707 ай бұрын
Very conveniently you didn't mention the fact that there was double the land given to Muslims to build a even bigger mosque.
@vishalrao40737 ай бұрын
It's like giving lands in return to those who attacked and occupied your own house. Court shouldn't give land to muslims to build mosque because they captured our Mandir's land at first.
@akhripasta26707 ай бұрын
That too 50% donated by Hindu devotee
@ankit43237 ай бұрын
Wait for Kashi and Mathura 😂😂😂.
@anushasaxena80737 ай бұрын
vote karo sab. bjo ko aana bahot zaroori hai
@sharansrihari78597 ай бұрын
Not a claim that a temple stood there before , archeological proof is there to substantiate the claim. Supreme Court has agreed to it as well
@kenster82707 ай бұрын
It's like the mosque built on top of the ancient Jewish temple in Jerusalem, or the transformation of the Hagia Sophia into a mosque, then a museum, and now a mosque once again. Lots of mosques and churches were buillt by colonial empires on the sites of pre-Islamic and pre-Christian places of worship. The Mughals and the Ottomans as well as the Portuguese and the Spanish were particularly fervent in this endeavour.
@akhripasta26707 ай бұрын
@kenster8270 that's the problem Babar & Humayun had G hadi mentality, rest of Mughal were half Indian & grew up here along side the culture.
@sandwich._.7 ай бұрын
5:16 Don't spread lies WSJ. Modi has never said in his capacity as PM of India, that he will transform India into a Hindu state. So, keep your anti-India agenda with yourself. This is not the India of 18th/19th century, which you used to divide & rule. So, stop your anti-India propaganda.
@TeamIndra7 ай бұрын
Of course Hindus building a temple where their lord was born, on land that the supreme court gave them is indeed very controversial.
@anujsethi78457 ай бұрын
How can God be born?
@f5rwall7 ай бұрын
@@anujsethi7845 If Gods son can be born to a virgin or a prophet born out of a camel trader, why can't God be born?
@yasink3317 ай бұрын
@@f5rwallI don't see the issue with the second? If a prophet is a human then a prophet can be born to anyone. God isn't human so God can't be born to a human
@ojasaklecha7 ай бұрын
@@yasink331God just made their incarnation, or in easier terms took human form due to various reasons and multiple times.
@samriddhabasu87647 ай бұрын
@@yasink331 well in our scriptures it is mentioned that bhagwan or god as you say, can take birth, only after they manifest themselves in the form of human, and if the logic suggest that gods can create human, why it is not possible for god , to be born as a human, why god cannot transform itself, from nirguna to saguna, why human today constrain themselves to a closed and monotheistic thinking I can't understand
@live4acause3597 ай бұрын
I am proud Indian Hindu. WSJ is telling me how India should be run. I am amazed.
@Mr_Abhi_.7 ай бұрын
The Indian government is not building it. A private trust is building it with donations from Hindu devotees.
@THUGSofMUKHARJEE_NAGAR7 ай бұрын
Jay Shree Ram from Ayodhya 🚩
@leah11427 ай бұрын
There is a place for Muslims mosque as well in Ayodhya and they are building mosque as well. So do report that too😡 not to be biased
@akhripasta26707 ай бұрын
Of which 50% is also donated by Hindu devotees
@darknebula4557 ай бұрын
That doesn't suit their propaganda
@ramux0787 ай бұрын
Babri mosque was not built on ruins of ancient temple, but it was built by demolishing it and this is just one such case of out of thousands in Indian sub-continent.
@ashraymanohar85397 ай бұрын
And before the mosque there was a Hindu temple, identified by the Archeological survey of India headed by a Muslim.
@DhruvPandey-k7i7 ай бұрын
So obvious that Christianity and Islam (both abrahamic) has an envy towards Dharma.
@Death__07 ай бұрын
Last thing I want to watch is coverage on India by WSJ. These MF does 99% Propaganda & 1% Journalism.
@SoumyaAdhikari-k4g7 ай бұрын
Wall street journal don’t question 30+ islamic state that have islam as a state religion but question a hindu nation which is not even decalared a hindu nation
@nazeerpasha20757 ай бұрын
Because no one can define Hinduism. And no one knows what is meant by being a Hindu.
@akhripasta26707 ай бұрын
@nazeerpasha2075 Dharma
@Maithili_V7 ай бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075 we will define that don't worry and declare India a Hindu country.
@msdolly61019817 ай бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075; says a Muslim 😅😂
@Dr.SyedSaifAbbasNaqvi7 ай бұрын
@@nazeerpasha2075"One of the wives of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) joined him in I`tikaf and she noticed blood and yellowish discharge (from her private parts) and put a dish under her when she prayed." - Sahih al-Bukhari 310 Mohammad could only afford one Undergarment for all his wife they used to apply spit to clean and wear it that's why they suffered from various sexual diseases & had yellow discharge from their private parts. Wonder why marry so many when you can't afford to dress them. Can you answer me ?
@Bangladesh209187 ай бұрын
Very very very poor journalism
@warpdrive92297 ай бұрын
@MISHA_NARANG_SHARMA Gian ho aap
@arpitshivhare2177 ай бұрын
😂@@warpdrive9229
@pankajmehar22757 ай бұрын
Modi havent pour money in it, devotee donated money for temple
@bethechange19457 ай бұрын
I feel like the speaker have venom instead of blood in her body
@TheTechInsiderBySaurabh7 ай бұрын
You have to understand that a country with 85% hindus waited years for court final decision. Can you imagine any other country with 85% people waited patiently for court decisions before building temple
@bartelgrant7 ай бұрын
yes I can
@amineboum94937 ай бұрын
80 not 85
@Dr.SyedSaifAbbasNaqvi7 ай бұрын
@@bartelgrant Whole secular Turkey keeps converting churches into mosques but WSJ isn't concerned.
@kp-kq7ux7 ай бұрын
Very true look at what the 'liberal' Turkish did to the Hagia Sofia and these clowns have the guts to lecture us.😂😂
@ayan89sett7 ай бұрын
"So in the end 2000 people mostly Muslims were killed " ... 😂😂😂😂 Hypocrisy ki bhi ek seema hoti hain
@SangitaKumari-wb5iz7 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@GamingInfo_037 ай бұрын
These Western don't have same.
@GamingInfo_037 ай бұрын
Western media don't have shame.always full of propoganda and then they say "we are unbiased and free media" 😂😂 Indians media is not free what a joke
@Trident4You7 ай бұрын
After reading Comments box ☑️🎁 "Mera desh Badal raha hai". India 🇮🇳 is capable for giving best reply to Western Propagandist.
@satyamsatpute60847 ай бұрын
Excuse me..Modi hasn't done anything..all the Hindus contribution made it possible 😅😂😅Check the facts..and don't listen to uncle Sam😂😂😂
@Dudsky7 ай бұрын
Uncle sam getting real grumpy
@Tradezonetrading7 ай бұрын
Bhai Modi ko Majority nahi milti parliament me to, kuch bhi nahi hota, tumhara donation bhi tabhi collect hua hai jab , Mandir banana ekdum pakka hogaya hai, agar koi aur party hoti to ghant kuch na hota. 🚩Jai shri Ram🚩.
@satyamsatpute60847 ай бұрын
@@Tradezonetrading bhai ladne waale case Vishnu Jain.. judgement Dene waali judiciary jiska sarkaar se koi lena dena nahi..toh ismei Modi ne kya kiya..pehle kiyaa tha andolan 90s mei🤣😂padh lo thoda
@bijayalaxmisamantaray57 ай бұрын
@@satyamsatpute6084Vishnu Jain was not the only one fighting😂 Infact, he had no role here.
@vikrantvijayakar99827 ай бұрын
Why western media cannot use correct words to narrate the facts as they are ...
@ggfg85707 ай бұрын
If Christians have Vatican, Muslims have Mecca and Madina as sacred places of worship why not the Hindus have Ram temple in Ayodya?