Why Nobody Else Exists: The Case For Solipsism

[@godq3]

The key is to understand that not only others do not exist, but you also do not exist. There is no you. There is nothing pretending that it is something.

[@theotormon]

Then there is pretending. And the orientation of that pretending.

[@Tay2Cheap]

Out of genuine curiosity how can you say we don’t exist? I don’t believe that most of reality is purely objective, but to say that we don’t exist as a whole is stepping the boundaries.

[@CMVMic]

@@HallowedBeThyName33 Define God, minds are not existents. Category error.

[@wakeup2realityostriches]

​@CMVMic you're right there's just one mind. For there to be anything or any technology there was a program or creator. That's literally all you need to know to find out everything else you want in the universe that will actually impact your or your surroundings.

[@CMVMic]

@@wakeup2realityostriches Minds are not existents. Category error. For there to be anything or any technology there was a program or creator. No, forms are not wholly distinct existents. Category error. Matter is all that exists.

[@robotsrule5051]

Isnt this basically what happens when we dream? All characters and surroundings and conversations are completely made up in our head.

[@MrFosthesensei]

yeah by the subconscious

[@AMUN-RA1111]

​@@MrFosthesenseiThere's nothing that exists outside of my mind. So, it's all the same thing.

[@AMUN-RA1111]

There is nothing that exists outside of my mind. So, it's all the same thing.

[@feistyflipflop4567]

But it's dreaming awake and awake is asleep?

[@mike365fly]

You cannot prove that your conscious daily life isn’t just another dream

[@Vic9994546]

It’s up to the solipsist to determine what to do with this conclusion enjoy the present illusion or be indifferent to it

[@modernblue24]

Please explain, What you mean by indifferent? Think different from popular opinion or culture?

[@Vic9994546]

@@modernblue24if you realize it’s all not real do you realize that the illusion is meaningless and ignore it and become indifferent or do you embrace and enjoy the ride

[@Vic9994546]

@i-love-cats75 what is nonsense? I can explain if you got a question

[@kiorst9190]

@@Vic9994546 its so weird to think about it man when you feel like youre the only conciousness and thats all you can experience and that other people experiencing anything cant ever be proven to you

[@JB-xl2jc]

It's similar to the nihilism/anti-nihilism divide. Nihilists realize that there isn't any real intrinsic meaning to existence, we are all just insignificant motes of dust- and this is quite a depressing idea, that often leads to dour, reclusive nihilists. Anti-nihilists accept the premise but reject the conclusion- they would say, sure, we don't have intrinsic meaning, life does not have some grand goal, and we are all insignificant in the grand scheme of things.... so instead of being depressed about that, instead we will choose to focus on the meaning that we ourselves assign to things. We may not be important to the stars and celestial bodies, but we are important to one another- the love and community ties that we form, the help we offer to the helpless, the improvement we create within ourselves. Just because we aren't important on a global scale doesn't mean we aren't important to ourselves or to those around us, and that love will be what carries us through, even if the very heavens themselves never cared or noticed.

[@allesisteins5593]

The river is made of the riverbed and the water flowing in it. On my NDE i saw my life as a riverbed which got filled with pure water made of light. It made all sense, I understood it. There is not "one" you, nor are there other "yous", nor is there "no you". The light, the water, whatever you call it, it is unnamable because it is the observing not the obserable. Your body, my body, the body of the world are all connected through the different paths of the river. Yet they all rejoin togehter. The water, the light, the unnamable flows through the riverbeds, giving life to all bodys. In this model or vision you might end up with the conclusion that the unnamable is one thing. But thats the problem, the vision needs to put the unnamable into a form, so the counscious mind can understand, can see, see itself. In many religions it is said that god is everywhere and lives within everybody. That god is the light, illuminating all things. I wonder, if God illuminates everything, can he see his own light? Or does he reside in eternal darkness not knowing what he is? Perhaps, God needs us the same as we need god. Maybe it comes down to the yin and yang symbolism. The two are one, but if they are one, they are none. From nothingness they emerge back to life and back to death and so on. It is all their dance. Or maybe nothing is pretending to be anything other than what it is, and the act of "pointing", of "speech itself" is the only illusion there is. The illusion which is also its own reality. Yin and yang? Nothing but letters on a screen. Listen to the rain, watch the clouds, taste an apple. Can you see it now?

[@mirrorspeak]

I went to a solipsism convention and I’m the only one who showed up.

[@quyducnguyen4513]

Here is the way to prove completely that solipsism is wrong: " Firstly, for the whole of a thing, nothing exists more than all the parts that make up the thing itself. --> All of that one thing cannot create another new thing that is not a part of, any part of, or all of that one thing and can only provide, transfer,... part, all parts, nothing, all of that one thing, any part,... of itself or of that one thing because when observe, measure,... in detail, till the end, rigorously,... all of what, how, where, why,... happened, even there is, are,... new one thing, new things, another thing, different thing,... that emerge, exist,... which is, are,... not a part of, any part of or all the parts of that initial one thing, things,... and that is, are,... not come, existed, emerged,... from as a part of, any part of, or all of that initial one thing then all of initial one thing, things,... is separated, is not relevant, is different, do nothing, do not provide, transfer,... any part of, anything of or all of itself, do not create, is not included, is independent,... from, to, of, ∅,... that, these,... new one thing, new things, another thing, different thing,... that emerge, exist,... which is, are,... not a part of, any part of or all the parts of that initial one thing, things,... and that is, are,... not come, existed, emerged,... from as a part of, any part of, or all of that initial one thing because when measure, observe, thought experiment,... in detail, till the end, rigorously,..., all of that initial one thing, things,... is still there, is still in the initial position, have not been lost any part, all parts,...,... but what existed after, the new one thing, another thing, different thing,... which is, are,... not a part of, any part of or all of that initial one thing and that is, are,... not come, existed, emerged,... from as a part of, any part of, or all of that initial one thing and that still exists, emerges,... is,... come, created, existed, emerged,... from the nearest, right next to, closest,... point of, position of, point compare to where, point relative to the location of, point relative to that, space of,... all of the initial one thing, all of the initial things,... is, are, ∅... or based on personal perspective, the new one thing, things, another thing, different thing,... which is, are,... not a part of, any part of or all of that initial one thing and that is, are,... not come, existed, emerged,... from as a part of, any part of or all the parts of that initial one thing, things,... is, are,... come, existed, emerged, created,... from nothing (not have volume, not anything,...) where right next to, nearest to, closest to, closest of,... all of that, these,... initial one thing, things,...,... . Finally, there are,... all of that initial one thing, things,... and what existed after, the new one thing, things, another thing, different thing,... that still exists, emerges,... and which is, are,... not a part of, any part of or all of that initial one thing and that is, are,... not come, existed, emerged,... from as a part of, any part of, or all of the initial one thing, things,... in 2, 3,..., n but not 1, 0, -1,..., (-n) different, exact, complete,... positions, locations,... . Secondly, the problem, question,... is "Is that everything,... comes from this position where my mind, my senses,... is, are,...?" The solution,... is to measure, experiment, self-experiment, observe, reason,... in detail, till the end, exactly, completely,... to prove completely that a part of, any part of, or all of the thing, the brain, the mind, senses,... that we, I,... feel, measure,... is not going anywhere or not going to where the external thing that we perceive, measure, observe,... is at, in,... or only, ∅,... stay where they, it,... is, are,... at, in,... and the external,... world that we perceive, observe, measure,... have not come from as a part of, any part of, or all of our mind, our sense, our complete self but come to our sense and is a completely different thing, another thing, a completely different person, another person, other things,... from a part of, any part of, or all of our, my,... self, senses, mind,... . Additionally, there are gaps in the amount of whole the parts, atoms,... when we do self-experiment, measurement, observation,... in two consecutive time points when right before the external thing,... reaches,... us, myself,... and right after it,... reaches,... us, myself,... in the system, process,... under consideration that we can observe, experiment, self-experiment, and measure,... in detail, rigorously, till the end,... . More specifically, this shows that there are more amount of atoms, things,... that exist,... in this system, at the endpoint of this process,... under consideration compared to the whole amount of atoms, things,... at, in,... the initial, first point of,... this system, process,... under consideration and that there are more amount of things,... that exist,... right after external things,... reaches,... us,... than, compared to,... the whole amount of the initial things,... in the initial system when right before the external thing,... reaches,... us, myself,... and in the endpoint of process, the end time point of the process,... the initial things,... which is our initial selves, my initial self,... is still conservative, preserved,... in the initial number of atoms, parts,... of itself while there are new things, other things,... that exist, emerge, appear,... in addition,... which are not ourselves, from our self,... but come from or come to the nearest space,... of,... whole ourselves, myself,... or come from or come to anywhere else where is not the exact, complete,... position,... of,... whole ourselves, myself,... . This finally shows that the total things in this system have increased and that shows the evidence of the external thing, world, bigger world than myself,...,... that is not only ourself, myself,... . You can see more things like force which is the interactions of external things and ourselves, or other physical phenomena but what I wrote before is enough to prove completely that there is an external world, things,... that are not only us, ourselves,... but even bigger,... than ourselves,... . To sum up, there is,... an external world,... that does not come from where I, my mind, my senses,... is, are, am,... and there is,... an external world,... that does not come as a part of, any part of, or all of I, my mind, my senses,... is, are, am,... and there is,... the world, the external world,... that I, my mind, my senses, my body,... have not or can not create, created,... but, then, and,... this, these, the,... world, external world,... still, ∅,... exists, differs, is not,... other than, outside from, from, ∅, outside, more than, beyond,... only myself, myself, oneself, yourself,... ." I hope anyone who reads this can live a happy life and not waste time solving this problem like me😊. Wishes the best for you❤.

[@mirrorspeak]

@@quyducnguyen4513 WHAT?!

[@quyducnguyen4513]

@@mirrorspeak sorry I have written again, check that out!

[@DaveedaLoca]

What gets me - is that at the end of your journey, all you will have ever experienced is merely electric signals, so you can't really ever be certain whether anything actually exists outside of you. Unsettling, but true

[@happierabroad]

Does anyone else feel that they are the only real person here and that everyone else are just actors like in the Truman Show or NPCs like in the Matrix or just characters in a dream? That would explain why people don't make sense and can't see obvious things that I see. Interesting question: When you are in a dream, you can talk to other people in the dream. So are the people in your dream self-aware and sentient and conscious? If not and they are merely creations of your own mind, then how do you know if people in the waking real world are real and self-aware or not? It's impossible to know. Any of you think about this too? Another possibility is shared solipsism, which is that there are a few real people or real souls in this matrix or dream, but most people are NPCs. Matt from the Quantum of Conscience channel talks about this and that's why most people are not awake at all.

[@spiritualak5147]

This thought came to me as I was falling asleep and I started freaking out! It actually makes a lot of sense especially the last part I said about they are not awake

[@Putri-nl2gg]

Dreams aren’t comparable to reality at least for me in dreams things are mostly extreme and nonsensical but reality is often mundane, if I or you were the only existence then why would we create this reality instead of one that is enjoyable.

[@RandomGuy-zl5sp]

@@Putri-nl2ggthat’s where i’m at also. this shit sucks too much for me to create it, and i have no control over what others can do to me or what the world can do to me.

[@DashVisionLLC]

It’s just you

[@Maayraa111]

Exactly, we are not creating it, something else wants our ‘emotions’ and ‘hurt feelings’, but once U realize you are in a dream 💭 dream you have more control of your emotions so they don’t ‘loosh you out’.

[@christopherpommer44]

As a little kid I felt like this I didn’t believe anything was real beyond me because there was no way too tell that anyone else was real I grew out of it but the idea still sits in my head now an again

[@speeddemon5339]

Things have been happening recently, things I can’t understand why they are happening, but they HAVE happened. A year ago I had dreams of the future. Dreams of my future, what I would see and hear through my eyes and ears. Even my actions. Memories of different lives, memories of fictional characters that would have happened in the future. An example is how I dream the entirety of Rick and Morty season 7. The most notable memories being the parts about how in the Finale episode, I was observing and experiencing everything from both Morty’s perspective, and a disembodied camera perspective. I remember screaming the most guttural scream ever when I realized Rick wasn’t in the fear hole with me, I remember kicking in the door to the Dennys, I remember being Charlie Morningstar from Hazbin Hotel and singing the same songs she did, I had full control over my actions, and what I did in the dream fucking happened in the series. Then there were the times where it was my own future, I remember watching Vox singing Stayed gone before the series even aired, and in the corner of my eye I could see the letters ntsg. Ntsg is a Hazbin hotel episode leaker, but I dont understand why I had a dream about the episode before it was even available through the early access. Let alone the Rick and Morty episodes. I remember being a black guy trapped in a flying alien ship, with strings that could unlock the door from the inside of the cell. I remember dreaming of the latest Alastor rap by Daddyphatsnap before it came out. A white haired blue Shego singing a cover version of Kim possible’s intro song, which ended up being a cover done by the vtuber Analee. Things are not what they seem in this universe, I could be living in a time loop, or the more terrifying idea. Is that solipsism is true, and I can predict what will happen next in my dreams.

[@grod2695]

Whoa ive had vivid dreams that came true but thats levels above lol, but isnt that an argument against solipsism

[@jsprunger6246]

TLDR also no paragraph breaks, you need to learn that

[@Strerium]

I have been always thinking that this life is an extended dream. And I still

[@lilchef2930]

So what’s death?

[@immersify3D]

Well, considering this reality is temporary, albeit, absolutely persistent... Still checks out.

[@JustJohnice]

My imagination is God and I create from my level of consciousness...I know we are all ONE but I am still God of my reality and I create, BY THOUGHT, what I WILL to see in my 3d...I love the concept of solipsism because I am highly in tune and focused on me BUT at the same time, the other people I SEE IN THIS WORLD are very real BUT only because I created something within me for me to view them as real and an integral part to my creations....I AM THAT I AM....

[@j3lly_m3lly]

if ur conclusion is that "a belief that self is the only thing that can be verified to exist" is the same thing as "a belief that u r the only thing that exists", then it doesn't seem like u understand what solipsism is- there's a difference between solipsism and solipsism syndrome solipsism is a mere way of looking at the world around u and urself, rather than a confirmation of the existence or inexistence of anything else than urself like u put it

[@Laughingsundrop]

being amazed by the talents and magnificence of others grounds me when I really start worrying about the unfalsifiable nature of solipsism. whenever I see something beautiful and awe-inspiring that I know I wouldn't ever be able to conjur up or expect to see in my own mind or dreams; I'm immediately reassured and I'm reminded of how enormous, alive and comforting the world can be

[@Lizard1582]

absolutely this. I think my own solipsism stems from being such a recluse, but I'm almost immediately relieved from it whenever I interact or see strangers who act in subtly chaotic ways. A comment here compared it when you dreams, but my dreams are honestly very predictable in hindsight or familiar when I wake up and have a chance to remember them. It's nothing like when I go out in in public and see other people doing invested in stuff I give 0 fucks about. I've really grown an appreciation for every sort of hobby or tradition existing because of this.

[@myis300turbo]

But you already did..you already thought of it. I think it's possibly we think like this because the universe is thinking of itself in the past. So in its mind everyone is a God. And in itself it is one with everyone. It is just itself thinking of the past using everyone.

[@Lizard1582]

@@myis300turbo You sound stoned.

[@signsandsymbols]

Dreams can be absolutely amazing

[@ZafOsophy]

The greatest gift, and greatest curse, is our imagination. Most suffering is in our own head, via imagination, and without a solid frame of reference.

[@daviddangerous1580]

I instigated the purchase of LSD at a very young age. 30 years later I still believe the idea I had during that trip. This concept continues…

[@jsprunger6246]

Well just know I 100% exist and am not trying to fool you. Is it possible that god is so infinite that it can have more than 1 perspective ? worst case scenario is that imo

[@maniniescobar244]

If we can communicate through this messages and not in Chinese then we all exist

[@BIGFACTSENT]

Is everyone real in your dreams or is it all in you? Isn't your dreams in your mind. Isn't your reality in your mind.

[@ImportantMeghana]

Non duality is the only answer for this doubt 😊

[@djlystics]

The only other thing existing beyond my mind (or my mind itself) made the word, solipsism, and idea up. It even made this video up to deter me from investigating further. The very fact that I am typing this comment may be my skepticism.

[@BIGFACTSENT]

Treat others as though they are real even if you believe they aren't

[@randysuggs7591]

I have never been religious and the other night i thought about this exact thing and had no idea if it had a name an then i find this. If i had to guess id say I'm the only thing in existence. I got bored and created me in my image to learn and experience life through this set of settings. Everyone else could be just the outside me helping the inside me share knowledge with each other. But it could be literally anything else as well so yea. I think I'm here to grow and experience and maybe report back idk. We shall see some day i guess.

[@tahaniawwad5034]

i had such thoughts these days which freaked me out

[@jsprunger6246]

If someone reads this I just want you to know I 100% have an Awareness but the real question is do you ? Is it possible for god to be so infinite that it can have more than 1 perspective all at once?

[@happierabroad]

Well of course most people don't believe in solipsism if they are just NPCs in the matrix or characters in a dream. Duh. That would support solipsism. lol

[@quyducnguyen4513]

Here is the way to prove completely that solipsism is wrong: " Firstly, for the whole of a thing, nothing exists more than all the parts that make up the thing itself. --> All of that one thing cannot create another new thing that is not a part of, any part of, or all of that one thing and can only provide, transfer,... part, all parts, nothing, all of that one thing, any part,... of itself or of that one thing because when observe, measure,... in detail, till the end, rigorously,... all of what, how, where, why,... happened, even there is, are,... new one thing, new things, another thing, different thing,... that emerge, exist,... which is, are,... not a part of, any part of or all the parts of that initial one thing, things,... and that is, are,... not come, existed, emerged,... from as a part of, any part of, or all of that initial one thing then all of initial one thing, things,... is separated, is not relevant, is different, do nothing, do not provide, transfer,... any part of, anything of or all of itself, do not create, is not included, is independent,... from, to, of, ∅,... that, these,... new one thing, new things, another thing, different thing,... that emerge, exist,... which is, are,... not a part of, any part of or all the parts of that initial one thing, things,... and that is, are,... not come, existed, emerged,... from as a part of, any part of, or all of that initial one thing because when measure, observe, thought experiment,... in detail, till the end, rigorously,..., all of that initial one thing, things,... is still there, is still in the initial position, have not been lost any part, all parts,...,... but what existed after, the new one thing, another thing, different thing,... which is, are,... not a part of, any part of or all of that initial one thing and that is, are,... not come, existed, emerged,... from as a part of, any part of, or all of that initial one thing and that still exists, emerges,... is,... come, created, existed, emerged,... from the nearest, right next to, closest,... point of, position of, point compare to where, point relative to the location of, point relative to that, space of,... all of the initial one thing, all of the initial things,... is, are, ∅... or based on personal perspective, the new one thing, things, another thing, different thing,... which is, are,... not a part of, any part of or all of that initial one thing and that is, are,... not come, existed, emerged,... from as a part of, any part of or all the parts of that initial one thing, things,... is, are,... come, existed, emerged, created,... from nothing (not have volume, not anything,...) where right next to, nearest to, closest to, closest of,... all of that, these,... initial one thing, things,...,... . Finally, there are,... all of that initial one thing, things,... and what existed after, the new one thing, things, another thing, different thing,... that still exists, emerges,... and which is, are,... not a part of, any part of or all of that initial one thing and that is, are,... not come, existed, emerged,... from as a part of, any part of, or all of the initial one thing, things,... in 2, 3,..., n but not 1, 0, -1,..., (-n) different, exact, complete,... positions, locations,... . Secondly, the problem, question,... is "Is that everything,... comes from this position where my mind, my senses,... is, are,...?" The solution,... is to measure, experiment, self-experiment, observe, reason,... in detail, till the end, exactly, completely,... to prove completely that a part of, any part of, or all of the thing, the brain, the mind, senses,... that we, I,... feel, measure,... is not going anywhere or not going to where the external thing that we perceive, measure, observe,... is at, in,... or only, ∅,... stay where they, it,... is, are,... at, in,... and the external,... world that we perceive, observe, measure,... have not come from as a part of, any part of, or all of our mind, our sense, our complete self but come to our sense and is a completely different thing, another thing, a completely different person, another person, other things,... from a part of, any part of, or all of our, my,... self, senses, mind,... . Additionally, there are gaps in the amount of whole the parts, atoms,... when we do self-experiment, measurement, observation,... in two consecutive time points when right before the external thing,... reaches,... us, myself,... and right after it,... reaches,... us, myself,... in the system, process,... under consideration that we can observe, experiment, self-experiment, and measure,... in detail, rigorously, till the end,... . More specifically, this shows that there are more amount of atoms, things,... that exist,... in this system, at the endpoint of this process,... under consideration compared to the whole amount of atoms, things,... at, in,... the initial, first point of,... this system, process,... under consideration and that there are more amount of things,... that exist,... right after external things,... reaches,... us,... than, compared to,... the whole amount of the initial things,... in the initial system when right before the external thing,... reaches,... us, myself,... and in the endpoint of process, the end time point of the process,... the initial things,... which is our initial selves, my initial self,... is still conservative, preserved,... in the initial number of atoms, parts,... of itself while there are new things, other things,... that exist, emerge, appear,... in addition,... which are not ourselves, from our self,... but come from or come to the nearest space,... of,... whole ourselves, myself,... or come from or come to anywhere else where is not the exact, complete,... position,... of,... whole ourselves, myself,... . This finally shows that the total things in this system have increased and that shows the evidence of the external thing, world, bigger world than myself,...,... that is not only ourself, myself,... . You can see more things like force which is the interactions of external things and ourselves, or other physical phenomena but what I wrote before is enough to prove completely that there is an external world, things,... that are not only us, ourselves,... but even bigger,... than ourselves,... . To sum up, there is,... an external world,... that does not come from where I, my mind, my senses,... is, are, am,... and there is,... an external world,... that does not come as a part of, any part of, or all of I, my mind, my senses,... is, are, am,... and there is,... the world, the external world,... that I, my mind, my senses, my body,... have not or can not create, created,... but, then, and,... this, these, the,... world, external world,... still, ∅,... exists, differs, is not,... other than, outside from, from, ∅, outside, more than, beyond,... only myself, myself, oneself, yourself,... ." I hope anyone who reads this can live a happy life and not waste time solving this problem like me😊. Wishes the best for you❤.

[@rob41137]

To anyone reading this comment, I guarantee you I’m real. I’m here and I’m imprisoned in this consciousness. Send help!

[@seanparker4461]

Just what I imagined you'd say...

[@rob41137]

@@seanparker4461 What an odd reply to my comment I concocted.

[@seanparker4461]

@@rob41137 Even more odd that I'm just a figment of your imagination!

[@ZakeeVEVO]

Ok, you sold me!

[@MatrixEdit]

Fake news! 😂

[@EpicQuotesEpicPeople]

I’ve experienced this very feeling on LSD 😂

[@crimsonhermit]

because it is true… you see reality more clearly

[@jmanathisfinest]

The major problem is that you will never truly accept solipsism. If you did your anxiety would cause your reality to collapse. So therefore the world is too convincing that individual minds exist. I'm content with that. Do you hear the dichotomy in this?

[@iamspiritualtechnique4177]

​@@nickswan5636Let's connect

[@iamspiritualtechnique4177]

.

[@Deniz-le9xp]

@@iamspiritualtechnique4177 Did you guys connect yet

[@Isaac8675]

@@Deniz-le9xp I believe they did a few days ago. I asked them privately

[@iamspiritualtechnique4177]

@@Isaac8675 lol what

[@JackReynolds-w7g]

This 3000 year old idea has been proposed over and again. And, if you are a Solipsist, then you face two both historical as well as existential problems. You cannot apprehend any other mind, irregardless; and two, - the 'meaning' alone cannot ever be twice understood. You can carry philosophical thought to the very perimeter of sanity. Many have done just that, - gone over the edge ! Use Ludwigstein's analytical phil. and Camus's existentialism and with some courage, - you won't need Solipsism to 'fall over'.

[@Definitelyahuman_999]

To me others dont really exist and the worlds not quite real and neither am i, but i am still scared of them and of the world on a paradoxal way

[@Uteria_888]

Yes.

[@AonghusCarone]

So let me get this right Is it that only I exist Or that we only exist in our own worlds

[@browdoe]

It is that only I exist, solipsism is classified as extreme version of subjective idealism, which means that there are only subjects who create objects and their surroundings in their own mind (objects and reality completely depend on the perceiving subject), while solipsistic person also has skeptical view on the existence of other perceiving subjects/minds who are not the person itself, not only outer material objects.

[@TheSerpent753]

God is the Solopsist. We are Its attempt to escape.

[@thenjoyedmessenger]

Yes. I'm here and it's all so intense to experience

[@nathansanchez51]

Descartes was not a solopsist.

[@khaledm7204]

Posts a video about solipsism and calls his channel the art of thinking.Maybe call your channel the art of being irrational.

[@mujtabaraisani7376]

this is contradictory

[@avivastudios2311]

Because? I'd like to talk

[@freemutulushakur6125]

@@avivastudios2311go get a girlfriend

[@Putri-nl2gg]

@@avivastudios2311 It could be that he is talking about history which wouldn’t exist.

[@Snozbearry]

My psychiatrist said I have solipsism and I have no idea what that means or why he thinks that but it makes sense I guess?

[@PLaStiiCMoNtAGE]

What a stupid ‘theory’ to take actually seriously

[@pmh9966]

Sit beside a screaming baby on a train will quickly bring you back to the world as it is

[@nonameneededd]

Yeah I’m good leaving this where it’s at. I don’t fancy digging any more in this, as it’s just going to back round to “why it even existed in the 1st place”. I think because the human brain is vastly neurotic within its own capacity, it wants to give itself a meaning. People who support this theory may want to seem edgy or ignore all that is wrong with the world, and it’s wrong doing since millennia till present date and for centuries to come, yet as the theory suggest, it is merely just that- your imagination. Question then is back to the “why” what is the point/purpose of it. Additionally, if nothing exist and you’re just imagining it, that also means you don’t exist, so that begs the question- what are we all waiting for? Let’s all break loose, set the whole world on fire, and destroy everything that exists in it. Since nothing exists, what is stopping you from doing this? 🤔

[@proven-ff8gw]

Boa noite!

[@dearrevenant1270]

Silly. Even "you" aren't real in your dreams

[@theshaktiya]

What is happening????? 😮

[@lessmoore2551]

So put in modern terms, solipsists kinda have Main Character Syndrome

[@EricSanchez-ds3yu]

This video is A.i generated all these comments are NPCs none of you mean or are anything

[@alx4animalss]

please be true, solipsism.

[@sameenergy9414]

Why do you want it to be true? 👀

[@CMVMic]

Hard solipsism is the position that only I exist but that depends on the definition of existence and the "i". An activity may be all that is happening but that entail an activity is an existent. Therefore, we can conclude that an activity is the happening or changes of something that exists and if you are the activity then you are grounded in something that exists and thus, hard solipsism can be refuted. Definitions (1) "I" refers to an activity/event (2) Existent refers to that a spatial substance that grounds an activity/event Premise 1. Events are not Existents Premise 2. If I am an event, then Solipsism (the view that "I" am all that exists) is false Premise 3. I am an event. Conclusion. Solipsism is self refuting and logically impossible as it contradictory and engages on in a category error and equivocation fallacy

[@OGRAZOFFICIAL]

I like potatoes Would a fake person really say something random like that 🙄

[@seanparker4461]

The vast majority of people do not believe solipsism is real? You've obviously not met many women, lol

[@EmmaElizabethPrice]

SOLOPSISM IS NOT REAL. OTHER MINDS ARE REAL AND THEY RUIN MY LIFE.

[@DragonSOL8]

It’s a Dream Universe. Go back to sleep