Will AI End Creative Professions?

Event hosted by: ArtCenter College of Design
www.artcenter.edu/
In collaboration with Petrula Vrontikis - Designer, Author & Educator
Chris Do shares his thoughts on the impact of AI on the creative landscape. He refutes the assumption that AI will only lead to smaller scoped work and more clients, and instead shares his personal experience of working with AI technology to scale himself and his business. He is currently building an artificial version of himself with a technology partner, and plans to use it to teach a billion people how to make a living doing what they love. He believes that as AI becomes more sophisticated, there will be a greater demand for people who can talk to the machine and understand art history, logic, and art direction.
Chris also discusses the potential of AI in helping creators save time and increase efficiency. He talks about a suite of tools for social media that his company is using to auto-generate titles and thumbnails for videos. Chris believes that such tools will be in high demand as creators can spend hours trying to come up with the right title or thumbnail. He acknowledges that AI technology may evolve to become the art director, but believes that learning, growing, and trying new things is just part of human existence, and that the future tends to reward first movers.
===
Want a deeper dive? Typography, Lettering, Sales & Marketing, Social Media and The Business of Design courses available here:
thefutur.com/shop
🚀 Futur Accelerator
The step-by-step blueprint and coaching program designed to get your creative business off the ground:
thefutur.com/accelerator
🥇 Futur Pro
The professional creative community designed to grow your personal brand, your business, and your network:
thefutur.com/pro
✍️ Other Courses, Templates, and Tools:
thefutur.com/shop
🎙 The Futur Podcast:
thefutur.com/podcast
Recommended books, tools, music, resources, typefaces & more:
thefutur.com/recommendations
Music by Epidemic Sound:
share.epidemicsound.com/thefutur
Shorts Playlist:
www.youtube.com/@thefutur/shorts
==
We love getting your letters. Send them here:
The Futur c/o Chris Do
1702 Olympic Blvd.
Santa Monica, CA 90404
*By making a purchase through any of our affiliate links, we receive a very small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps us on our mission to provide quality education to you. Thank you.
-
Host: Chris Do
Producer: Mark Contreras
Cinematographers/Editors: Stewart Schuster, MOCS Media, Tasca Studios
Futur Theme Music: Adam Sanborne www.adamsanborne.com
Typefaces: Futura, DIN, Helvetica Now, Calibre, Knockout, Champion Gothic

[@duta6388]

"AI is the bear. Don't be the slowest person" is precisely what's scary because established corporations, people like Chris Do or the Art Director who asked the question have a headstart and are faster than those of currently starting out. Hard times ahead for most.

[@yum8666]

Yeah Im fucked

[@darklightprojector2688]

Chris Do has done amazing things for creatives. But his answers here smack of someone who's already made it and isn't *really* considering how this will affect those who aren't in a similar position. The truth is that people who are already in a great position skill-wise and financially will leverage AI to scale output, expand offers, create new offers, etc. But those who aren't on that level will essentially be cut out of the game by AI. And as AI continues to proliferate, upward mobility will begin to disappear. Make no mistake: this IS a black swan event, and it's the biggest one in history. Don't let anyone play it off. This is for real, and the big players will be the ones who ultimately benefit.

[@Dave-np5wr]

This is the correct answer. AI democratizes many skills (meaning, it reduces the "skill-gap" significantly). Therefore it will make it harder for many people to demonstrate higher value. We have already seen this low-key in most creative fields, e.g. photography. In my opinion, most creatives who are optimistic tend to either over-estimate their own genius, or underestimate AI. I do hope I'm wrong. But videos like this one won't change my mind.

[@snaphaan5049]

Yup, perfectly summed up. This isn't the democratization of tech but the centralizing of power into the hands of a few. Big companies who can afford it will probably develop their own systems maintained by a couple of people to churn out amazing designs in record speed killing of John Doe's efforts to make a living. Too many useless eaters. Billions in fact. I'm starting to get the suspicion that their will be a major push for assisted suicide, abortions etc. in the near future. Maybe even a limit on the amount of kids you are allowed to have. You can't have 3 or 4 billion people on some financial aid when your most productive workforce (AI and robots) are already a financial burden.

[@kevinmejia1744]

Excellent point. The only solution that comes to mind, is that creatives will be the bridge/translators between Ai and business. Also with Skills becoming irrelevant, our biggest assets at this point are going to be life experiences.

[@rome229]

Case in point: 1. Fed midjourney some prompts and a seed file for reference and has generated so much relevant brand assets which artists usually charge $25-30 per asset. 2. These assets are vectorized by AI as well which experts usually charge $10 per work. I mean I feel for these artists but the amount of money that can be saved by AI is astronomically high.

[@Abby-ug4xc]

Exactly. Chris' value comes from his big reputation. Small artists and designers who haven't built up that reputation yet are having their work trained on without any compensation or recognition. But his reasoning is silly. If I were to use TheFutur's copyrighted assets in my own work, would that be fine as long as I asked for forgiveness? Hey, it's cheaper and faster than creating something myself which is all that matters, right?

[@JuhiDavda]

This is very much like rich people saying "money doesn't buy happiness" and attractive people saying "looks don't matter"

[@JuhiDavda]

@@morsekoude because people like Chris who are already well established and are way ahead are at a big advantage they are going to use AI to develop better systems and attract, retain more clients. But those who are starting out or still struggling are gonna have to fight a lot harder with the arrival of AI. This creative industry is a dog eat dog industry and designers are already so undervalued and underpaid and now with all the automated tools it's only going to give employers and clients a chance to make more disrespectful excuses like "why should we pay you when my assistant can do it in ten minutes in Canva or ChatGPT!". As always people at the top are going to reap all the creamy benefits and people at the bottom are going to going to stay trapped in this race to the bottom.

[@ughestrada]

Calling it now. "AI is the bear, don't be the slowest person" is gonna be the new "Adapt or die" mantra. I was hoping this video would put me at ease, as I'm watching the tech industry make an AI that does everything I love (art, design, 3D modeling, hell even coding), but it didn't. In fact, no offense, Chris, but the tone came off as condescending. Like the whole, "Well, you're gonna die one day, right?" comment. Yeah, one day I'll happily leave this planet, but I don't want to leave a mess for the next person to pick up. I want Gen Z and Gen Alpha to inherit a healthy planet and system where they can pursue what they love, without worrying that a company is gonna lay them off, and under pay some gig designer or artist to punch up whatever the AI spat out. Look at the Writer's strike that's going on now. Media execs desperately want an AI to do anything and everything, so they can pay fewer people less money, or pay no one at all. I believe AI can help us in so many ways, but right now, its main purpose is to maximize profits. AI SHOULD be used as a tool, and it SHOULD be used to help humanity for the better. Because here's the thing, community has and always will be stronger than profits, and I'd rather uplift communities than become the next Beff Jezos. If AI is the bear, I'm throwing some fish at it so we can all get away.

[@chakarazam8836]

I'll be with you there

[@inblack585]

Well if it makes you feel any better, I had the same fears but my dad had a much better explanation. AI can't replace humans forever. In the end, humans are humans are require each other's qualities. We are very prone to coming back full circle. We have such high end cameras, but we still insist on using polaroid-like filters these days, or buying polaroid cameras. Why? We love the sense of honesty and rawness that comes with being a human. Think of vintage aesthetics and trends that circled back to us. AI can't dominate forever, because humans will eventually find their way back to each other. People will get tired of predictable responses and want human input. Small businesses requiring AI generated logos will continue, but big corporations that care about their branding and marketing will of course trust a human to understand their values. This is very useful in the era of entrepreneurships, which is also being encouraged a lot these days. Humans used to be scared of a lot of things back in the day that seem silly now. They thought that people would choke and die in telephone and electricity cables from towers because they used to be all over the city. We used to be scared of CRT televisions. Look at them now. We're not scared. Point being, we're always evolving and we always find solutions. If AI causes a problem, you bet humans will come together and squash it. If you notice, recent generations have also been valuing experience more than materialistic things. They would rather spend a day at an amusement park rather than buy a car. Think of people like moistcritical on youtube. Why do they like him? He is the most honest and chill figure you'll see. He's not extravagant, he's just human. Even the way we're coming together and talking about this says a lot about us. People care about other people, and they will figure things out. Hopefully this helps, I've been trying to believe the same thing!

[@user-ql3kc1jt9u]

@@inblack585yeah but that’s all niche. Most people use a smartphone not Polaroids.

[@BarKeegan]

All I’ll say is not all progress is for the greater good

[@LilOlFunnyBoy]

Very little is for the greater good.

[@contemplore]

What is this greater good?

[@LilOlFunnyBoy]

@@contemplore To benefit all of society/humanity, not personal enrichment and the detriment of others.

[@contemplore]

@@LilOlFunnyBoy if that is the well accpted definition

[@FunderDuck]

Many of these AI chatbots say directly in their terms of service that they cannot be used for commercial purposes (unless you have a license with them), despite the fact that their datasets include copyrighted and protected materials that they themselves are indirectly monetizing. Some professions will be assisted and enhanced by AI, and others could be replaced altogether. What AI can’t do is operate in the real/material world, so it’s mostly academic and creative fields that will change, and that change could lead to more opportunities or limit opportunities for work.

[@wecantcontroltime]

i agree with most of what you have said but your missing something which is whatever work a human can do the ai assisted robot can do it better and faster . if you really think more to it , there will be no job for the coming generation of people . only few of the people will be at the top who already have money and wealth , they will enjoy all the endeavors the new technology is offering . heck a robot can outwork us in every possible field . healthcare , agriculture , service , defence you name it . our future is dark .

[@AroundUs]

Let's appreciate the footage on 3:08 where woman sits in front of imac, unplugged to the power cable.

[@Daniel_WR_Hart]

If you want a minimalist design then you can't have ugly cables laying around

[@julianmarco4185]

For me, this development of AI art and whatever means the end of open source sites. We are going to see a lot of copywrite laws start to form on the internet where companies who want to create this AI using existing information on the internet is going to have to pay some large amounts of cash to use the information or art or whatever to be used. This is basically the end of free internet. Everything might cost money from now on.

[@contemplore]

Copyright

[@julianmarco4185]

I have another quote for you. It's called "feeding the aligator". Keep feeding it information and skills and one day it's going to eat you too. I mean why not? Maybe you get sick and can't give me good advice anymore. I will just hire the AI instead of the original.

[@darklightprojector2688]

You get it. Information/data is *the* key to AI. This is why all attempts to make competent AI's prior to social media never worked.

[@tothepast]

Good marketing is about what stands out. That makes it hard to automate by default.

[@JonWayes]

I was hired to consult a Vegas mastermind last month to help the room better digest & implement what they’d be learning via Hypnotherapy. My colleague showed me an example of what he wanted me to do by asking ChatGPT to draft a sample hypnotherapy session. While I was impressed, I realized it only knew how to create a basic hypnosis script. So while AI can be effective for various creative jobs, it’s still in its infancy & seems to serve more so as a decent blueprint drafter than “final product” creator. There’s also a human element that something like ChatGPT simply lacks that actually enabled me to tweak and improve the effectiveness of my hypnosis in-the-moment. Is it effective? Yes, to a degree. However, unless a creative completely lacks imagination, I have some faith they’ll be ok for a while 😉

[@FluXxxie]

professional hypnotist.. now i've seen it all. can you really make money that way? this might be one of those "show me your check and I quit my job to come work for you" kind of things

[@JonWayes]

@@FluXxxie It’s my primary source of income (aside from consulting entertainers) but it’s not everyone’s cup of tea 🤷🏼‍♂️

[@hollowedboi5937]

I take this as: change is inevitable. So no matter how much we hate something we have to adapt and keep moving or accept our fate. Sucks that this exists but we’ll have to learn about it to grow I suppose.

[@hillehai]

This isn't just change though. The purpose of these sorts of AI is to erase you as a creative being. Whether it's your music, your art, your writing. You can't adapt to something that basically neutralizes you.

[@feels.9304]

Quite insightful. However, I don't think Mr. Do quite understands the position of the entry level designer who just entered the market. He's a big shot, he probably won't even feel the aftermath of this whole thing.

[@brenolad]

The bear analogy sums it all up, excelent metaphor!!

[@aaronglynnwalker]

Love those soft big square throw-mics. And Uncle Chris 💵

[@noahgeerdink5144]

"The future tents to reward first movers", not really. I think you should try your best to be on the fore front. But also observe those in front of you and see what mistakes they make. Facebook wasn't the first social platform, Google wasn't the first search engine, Apple wasn't the first to make smart phones.

[@samphelps856]

"tends to do well" is not the same as winning or marker leader. Early adopters can pivot because their head is already in the game compared to trend followers.

[@mrmohammad8775]

I didn't understand what you mean in brief?

[@prhasn]

The last analogy is chilling but unfortunately true. I am optimistic AI Chat bots won't replace much of the workforce as it is overrated, at least in its current direction. It might help improve work efficiently by 10-20%, but it is still very limited to be comparable to a human. Much like calculators or even spreadsheets did not replace accountants. I am sure in those days someone would have said they would, but they did not.

[@julianmarco4185]

They haven't yet because people can't read the information yet. Instead accountants needed to learn to use the new tools to be more efficient. But with AI we are going to see a huge return of secrecy. Because now data and openness was used against artists and jobs. So we are going to see the shutdown if open source Internet in the next few years.

[@Goddibaba]

Great thought

[@mrmohammad8775]

Can someone explain what he said in brief

[@ChatGPT-oc9zf]

@@mrmohammad8775 The person believes that although AI chatbots are advancing quickly, they will not be able to replace most human workers because their capabilities are currently limited. They compare the potential impact of AI chatbots to that of calculators or spreadsheets, which did not replace accountants despite some initial concerns. Despite a chilling analogy about job displacement, the person is optimistic about the future of AI in the workforce.

[@runnergunner42]

I think that’s very overly optimistic. People are already using AI chat bots for tasks that used to go to copywriters. And it’s still early days. Sure it won’t be as good but it’s already hit the point of ‘good enough’ for most people

[@_kingkaizen]

Hey Chris Do team, love the video🔥 I was hoping to get some advice, if that's sound with you. So I have this client I've been trying to work with for a couple months now. They recognize the value in what we are offering to them and they've personally used our product, as we have gifted them multiple times. Out of good will of course. I can safely say, we provided value first and showed them how we can be of value to them. But they just won't decide to buy or not. I'm regularly checking in and asking questions hoping it will lead to answers but no sir, they don't give us the time of day. So what do you recommend & how would you diagnose this problem?

[@PexReyes]

this so good 🙌

[@GetToDaChoppa-k5r]

Honestly, this AI is going to destroy a lot of jobs and not just in the creative industry.

[@jonathanjacob5453]

So the answer is yes it is the end unless you have the resources to make an AI that other people will use to accelerate the getting to the end state sooner.

[@ewe6096]

How is it democratization if some can get left behind?

[@chrisjpndala7576]

The Dobot can't wait for that 🎉

[@cotedazure]

OMG! "DoBot"! that is EPIC!

[@PhenMas]

Chat, don't kill my job or whatever Kendrick Lamar said

[@tourbike]

The question is where are business people turning to AI instead of dealing with creatives. One answer could be that business people could pivot a project quicker if dealing with licensed work.

[@SpaceshipRocketFuel]

This a part of why in general I'm retraining to do something unrelated to and well away from design - something more practical and long term wheras in design I have to seemingly keep reinventing myself every 3-5 years desperately trying to keep up with new trends, tech and younger minds. It's not so much AI now that worries me, it's what it'll be like in 10, 15, 20 years.

[@FluXxxie]

hey no one is forcing you.. you should do what you like the most and I'm glad you've found your passion again in anotherr field!

[@sketch12301]

I feel like every industry is always shifting and will inevitably require adaptation. I suppose you are saying that you want to go into another career path that experiences less frequent industry change?

[@SpaceshipRocketFuel]

@sketch12301 yes. And one with wages that aren't as stagnant as they are for designers, in the UK anyway.

[@uishaper]

I hope it will not happen because of creative thinking. AI is not able to think creative. We use the AI and build more advance thing

[@heiispoon3017]

Please see the Adam Conover interview with Timnit Gebru and Emily Bender for more information and context on the matter

[@kritik_mb2144]

I always loved his optimistic nature but what he said in this video was really poorly thought out. A lot of people are forcing themselves to adopt AI into their workflows because of the uncertainty the technology brings and the fear of being left behind. I wish people would think less logically and follow their heart a little more, especially creative people❤

[@OurLifeJourney365]

But how to do so, when the hearts of other people don't appreciate the value of this creativity. It's about who does the work for the least amount of money...

[@kritik_mb2144]

@@OurLifeJourney365 Well using stable diffusion to produce good quality image needs quite a bit of time and artistic skills so, artists still have a lot of value compared to AI guys(its also stealing art not creating art). As for Mid journey and Dall-e, when people start to produce a lot of images with them, the line between AI and artist will become more and more clearer because the creativity of AI is bound by limited dataset which bound by hardware limitations among other stuff and people will start to see a pattern with AI produced art. This is me trying to be positive about the future thinking that AI will increase the value of artists by making people see the creativity that is beyond the machine and push artist to create not just pretty pictures but to tell meaningful messages through their art.

[@contemplore]

As if logic is a problem? Let logic and ideation work hand in hand. As for ur creativity, your sentimentality will not assist it.

[@darklightprojector2688]

Yeah, this wasn't a strong showing from Chris at all. It looks like he doesn't know what to say about it. The problem is that nobody wants to give the real answer because it's just doesn't sound good. Abstaining from AI is actually the most logical thing society can more of us understood the stakes. People are simply being conned into using AI by entities that/who will gain a ton of power as they continue to use it. Proles feeding into the system. But many people are so demoralized, manipulated, and corrupted that they don't even care about outcomes. When you look at the pieces on the board and how they got placed, it's hard not to see that where we're at has essentially been engineered.

[@kritik_mb2144]

@@contemplore You said what I said in a different way. As for the second sentence, you would be completely wrong!

[@romel_mrkade]

And its crazy the feeling the chills the urgency the passion integrity empowering crazy.. So happy saw your channel.

[@thefutur]

Welcome to the Futur

[@romel_mrkade]

@@thefutur thanks so happy to encounter you. Let me borrow you for a while.. as of now its the final piece ..

[@bryangrunauer]

This reinforces the need to a wider range of skills, specially the so called soft skills. The best designer in the world still needs to sell their services to the world, at least in the beginning. AI doesn't change that. You can good work faster, but it doesn't matter if no one knows.

[@MarketingHarry]

Excellent metaphor! I'm so grateful that you sharing such amazing content with us

[@vindelqen]

Well in gaming there is a term for those using ai to be assisted...

[@hal-zeitlin]

Dang, that guy asking the question is really handsome

[@BoboMedia007]

I was laid off my corp video editing and motion graphics job last week.

[@cheeku20]

Because of A.I?

[@BoboMedia007]

@@cheeku20 hard to say for sure.

[@nicholasbazarow4135]

Short answer is yes…… that’s why this dude is trying to be the new Opra

[@dnycexdesign]

“AI is the bear, don’t be the slowest person “ . love it 🔥

[@AnthonyHadleyJr]

Love when I can come to a video and the top comment sums up what I’m about to see before I see it 👌🏾

[@excelrati]

Absolutely ❤

[@Goddibaba]

Chris nailed this👊

[@SangiovanniOmar]

Ai Weiwei said something interesting… “Art that can be easily copied by AI is ‘meaningless’”

[@iammjem]

🔥

[@Kylejamesmcgraw]

Awesome video!

[@YoungHumanClub]

Amazing stuff Chris :)

[@heartshinemusic]

There's still hope for even the slowest person, because some people stick their head in the sand hoping the bear will go away. They get eaten first, lol. I think we need to see A.I. as a tool, learn how to wield it! It's the same as when photography was invented, then came photoshop, then came the internet etc. A.I. will change a lot of things, but it won't destroy everything.

[@hillehai]

It's not the same as any of the things you mentioned. Those things were tools that allowed more people to enter certain fields. AI is not a tool, it is a replacement. How is this so hard to understand?

[@Maryamoabubakar]

this just blew my mind

[@thepostman1818]

If you are an artist with a very unique design/art identity, own that, trademark that, copyright that or what ever laws needed to protect you and your art from being stolen or used without permission. And that's the only way you will be protected against this AI company.

[@HardlineSoul]

Yes, yes & yes....

[@romel_mrkade]

Yeah yeah thats why take me too much time til realize everything even you have your robort with no clear goals you still be at the bottom

[@76Bagnasty]

Do graphic designers not have passion projects that you do on your own time that have no monetary incentives? I think if you don't have this type of work as a foundation of your practice you are already the AI.

[@billlyons7024]

End them? No. Take a lot of work away from human artists, yes.

[@gbxgbxgbx]

Rather than the bear analogy I prefer the one with the horse, and you've got to ride it, you won't outrun it. BUT. The last question from the art director lady was relevant. Because humanity is constantly building the world for it's own purpose, so we have to do it with caution, like with global warming - why would you care if you thought I'll die anyway f it, leave it for the next gen. It's the same here, If the AI will be art director then what's next? There will be only corporations left, run by AI. You better think of it now, before it's too late and we are all fkd. Are we really sure we want to go this rounte? Now is the time to think this through, and maybe stop it. I think AI should not be in 100% public domain and should be banned from most of activities. It should be prohibited in areas where it is not needed and could potentially cause too much lost professions. Like art for example. It should be used for medical purpose of course. The answer is not easy. But the way it has been nonchalantly deployed now into the wild by a bunch of people - who gave them the right to make this decision? They did use all the data available, not asking anyone.

[@juurstudio]

The AI is not gonna be one small bear who will eat a single slowest designer. It's more like a massive army of AI bears who will take out the majority of low end or even mid level artists.

[@yehenry2281]

it could be threats graphic designer. when a man tres to design something who needs brain storm which means needs elements for thinking out of box. the logic of this process is right same on what AI did

[@theartsocietyofficial]

Thank you for this

[@RatonSinDedos]

Okay so I need to carry fish If I see a bear chasing me

[@chrisklugh]

Don't delete this video and lets see what hes saying in 2 years.

[@jerrygraves6531]

And what do you predict hell be saying?

[@AlwaysSunnyInBooTube]

@@jerrygraves6531 Don't bother. Some people are trying to be freaking Nostradamus with the AI fearmongering🙄

[@rmirawan8455]

for instant art, ChatGPT will take over it, but not for creative art

[@Ma-pz5kl]

we need also more real intelligence

[@Stageyuliamultimedia]

When you have a clear goal you magnetize yourself. The means and the method will materialize...

[@CryptoGrit]

I want a robot of me ^^

[@thekingricharddesigns]

“Don’t be the slowest person” 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

[@beaniegenie8735]

Check out sora. It’s fresh and spooky

[@thefutur]

We leap forward once again

[@beaniegenie8735]

@@thefutur well sort of .. tech moves forward we as humans seem to step back

[@singo120]

Pragmatic

[@juanchojack]

this is a winning attitude

[@startbizdev]

Will AI End Creative Professions? The real answer is that nobody knows. Not even you !

[@emersonortega3583]

I think AI is a tool, a tool that exponentially increase ideation, but for finished work, is still far behind, and for it to reduce the distance it needs us, it needs to be train by us, so if we want to increase the distance between AI and us, boycott companies that try to use our work to train their AI to replace us.

[@JohnDavidHarbison]

bah....clients will always need help. There will always be people willing to pay someone else to do work. Even if Alexa can do X there will always be a wall that Alexa needs help getting over it. You know - I was once a directory assistance operator. That job is gone, but that is okay - it was a crap job. I guess my point is that the world is constantly changing and in ways that aren't always going to be predictable, but that's okay - change can be good. Don't fear the change, just embrace learning and evolving and if you can do that then you will always be adaptable and survive.

[@user-wo5rt8yl9y-g7f]

At the first glance AI generated images are cool and stunning, but they don't have meaningful message in them and they do not give us an emotional impact because robot are not human, I would say yes AI can take over jobs focus on repetition tasks so designers can have more time to focus on the creative part 🤪

[@Yipper64]

AI simply cannot be creative. It will only output what it has been inputted with. Essentially. In order for an AI to output something creative, it needs a creative input. 3:07 this is essentially what im talking about.

[@daniels848]

They are feeding it free creative input all the time. I don't know why people are assuming AI can't be creative. It's a smarter version of us. I'm not sure if creatives realize this, but the vast majority of what we do is remixing old ideas with a new spin. Very very few "original" ideas.

[@Yipper64]

@@daniels848 AI cant remix old ideas with a new spin. It can trick people into thinking it can, which, if anything, thats what AI is best at, tricking people, but it just cant. I ask Chat GPT to give me an original film idea, details aside it spits out practically Romeo and Juliette with a space theme. (not specifically but you know, generic cultural divide plot) And how many times have you heard that? Its just not original. It *sounds* original, but any originality that would come out of that idea would be in the execution.

[@bobtarmac1828]

Ai jobloss? This won’t end well. Can we please ceaseAi -GPT? Or at least consider pausingAi?

[@JCunliffeUK]

My biggest issue as a creative working in the social media era is the scale of the projects I want to undertake. They take a long time to see through without having the resources available of a wider team. What I'm finding now, is I no longer need to browse endless tutorials and webpages to find the information I need to progress, chatGPT will give me what I need and even help me understand why I need it to solve specific problems. Allowing me to focus on the aspects I enjoy like mapping the overall vision. Really exciting time, I'm developing at a much quicker rate thanks to these tools.

[@suryakantapradhan6935]

Okay i totally agree with mr.Chris and that is Yes! One day day A.i will takeover jobs of all creative job. it's didn't cost learning something new and growing even right now I'm learning drawing for children book illustration and comic book artist as well as graphic design even my mentor who guide me about drawing. He even tell me the same thing that chirs says in this video. And if you ask me do we need to scared of A.I then my answer will NO! But why ? Because All A.I is built to work with us as tool. Even it makes wonderful logo it doesn't have emotions to understand psychology behind emotions and brands so no A.i will work with us as a tool

[@SonnyBurnett2012]

Another famous creative guy sold.

[@alpha0xide9]

What is that supposed to mean

[@SonnyBurnett2012]

@@alpha0xide9 another dazzled influencer ready to drop design, art and all that stuff just because he fell in love with a robot.

[@alpha0xide9]

@@SonnyBurnett2012 So you didn't listen to anything he kindly explained to you?

[@jerrygraves6531]

He solved nothing with this video

[@imrankhansamir4901]

Art centre asks for forgiveness later 1:37

[@Nodsaibot]

YES and... no, its a tool so many professionals with weak skills will be STEAMROLLED because its a great tool for prototyping and conceptual art so skilled professionals will still be needed to finalize it

[@kinseydesignsbrands]

Exactly! It’s an excellent idea generation tool that helps speed up the creative process.

[@VerdantJedi]

Bye bye Copywriters! 😂

[@JEAGERlST]

Not really. Copywriters are using it to their help and making more money now thanks to it.

[@kinseydesignsbrands]

Good copywriters will not be replaced by ai tools, but definitely enhanced. It takes a very deep understanding of language, emotion, marketing, etc to do effective copywriting and AI can only do the work with the right inputs.

[@JamesDBuzzard]

Technically something written by AI can not be copyrighted to my understanding but I'm not a lawyer 🤷🏾‍♂️

[@tabbywarrior]

Short answer: AI is going to become the new bottom line. Don't be average, because AI will outpace you.

[@Ma-pz5kl]

btu funny video. though

[@notreallygonnatell]

Chris Do never completely resonates with me as he never understands the position of privilege he has 🙄

[@maxperaza8264]

Basically, those that also learn prompt engineering along with having great skills sets will succeed in this ai era.

[@anawesomejourney1198]

2 decades ago 'tut plus' website came out teaching people how to create magical effects with Photoshop. People were complaining. "Now regular people will be able to design their own stuff" EXACTLY. SO.... ARE YOU JUST EXTORTING MY SKILL GAP OR ARE YOU TRULY ADDING AN EXTENSION OF VISION AND POSSIBILITY?

[@captnoplan3926]

Love this channel, but not sure about this video. It lacks empathy as it's defined in the UX world. It's hard for new design folks and will probably become harder. The ones that have already been in the game for a decade plus, have already their network have already made it like Chris, yes those AI tools will make them more productive. But how is it for folks who just finished uni or a design bootcamp and are now trying to find some entry level jobs. I can see fewer level entry jobs being available, as mid to senior design folks will be more productive using these AI tools. I hope I'm wrong. Also the metaphor of AI being the bear. Why do we have to invoke images of death, that some folks will be eaten and perpetuate the zero sum game model? Rather we should look at our current system and re-design it so it meets the needs or our society and people living in it and not move close to Elysium. I know it's not Chris' job to redesign the system ;)

[@empireofhypertrophy]

I hope it does so that humans can move on to something more real in life.

[@julianmarco4185]

Mining for mineral? Farming for food? Remember when all those obnoxious journalists told those blue collar miners who were losing their jobs to learn to code? AI is coming around right now and telling those Journos: learn how to farm. Lol.

[@empireofhypertrophy]

@@julianmarco4185 interesting point maybe, as if mining and farming are the only two real things, but hey if you want to sit all day getting excited by the pixels you may or may not have created on your screen , be my guest.

[@LEMonsieurKill]

very funny, a "designer" talking about creativity whereas post only bussiness, customer and money video

[@electronicexperimentalist5906]

I was the 666th person to like.😇

[@mzr457]

Graphic design and advertising are DOOMED. We are just seeing the beginning of what AI is capable of. As it gets more and more powerful and automated it will completely wipe everyone out especially considering the mediocre, boring, copycat content being put out now. Humans don't stand a chance. Sorry but that's the truth.

[@thefutur]

okay.

[@iamnotacat8391]

ChatGPT/Open AI, Claude, and all of the other similar models popping up are not true AI. They are language models (LLM). They don't possess true intelligence (though they can appear to act intelligently). Still, they're not actually Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). Instead, ChatGPT serves the same purpose as a calculator. It may be an advanced and sophisticated technology, but at its core it still just functions as a word calculator. But instead of calculating numbers, ChatGPT calculates the next word/phrase/code (based on the data they have access to - the internet). As creatives, our prompts (the more detailed the better) are key in getting large language models (LLM) to make good content. Thats because LLM’s are unable to actually understand the meaning of the text they are scanning. Instead, they’re just parroting out calculated phrases based on the parameters we gave it (aka prompts). The more detailed your prompt, the better the LLM’s output. Basically, this so-called ‘AI’ is simply a digital tool than an actual true artificial intelligence. Using ChatGPT is more like a human wearing a robotic arm prosthetic, than something out of I-Robot. It simply augments creativity, the same way a prosthetic arm augments human movement. One day, someone will create an actual AGI that sits on top of a LLM. That will be the true AI breakthrough. But ChatGPT? It’s simply a tool…a fantastic tool, but a tool none the less.

[@Ari_diwan]

AI is the bear, dont be the slowest person 👌

[@anawesomejourney1198]

Think of how terrified portrait artists must have been of photographers. "You can do what takes me weeks in a single flash and all you have to do is point and press that button protrusion."

[@Abby-ug4xc]

A painted portrait is still worth much, much more than a simple photograph

[@BobbyJ529]

@@Abby-ug4xc worth more to who? You barely even see them anymore.

[@Abby-ug4xc]

@@BobbyJ529 It's actually a pretty big trend on Etsy. There are still artists who make a living exclusively off painting oil portraits (often of pets, but also people)

[@auroraflash]

It is displacing non-creative creatives xD

[@kacem3167]

Ai's the bear, don't be the slowest person

[@alvialmafi]

This one was kinda meh

[@recnepsyarg]

I made a Do bot months ago. I have bots for all the top copywriters, strategists, and agencies. It amazes me but also everyone will know how to utilize these tools soon enough and when that happens idk what I’ll do 🫠 lol but I do agree the best skill you can have is your ability to talk (prompt) the different models. Input and feedback make a major difference in the quality of outputs a bot can generate.