Will Ai Replace JavaScript Developers First?

[@joshuasimmons696]

Incredible, at 44 I decide to switch from a life in construction to web development, and now AI is gonna make sure that there's nothing left but construction work.

[@RB621337]

Im a plumber looking to get out into tech. Am I making the wrong choice now?

[@edd541]

@Frank Zappa no. You're making the right decision by getting into tech. I've been in IT for 19 years now. I'm a network engineer. If you want a bulletproof career and safe during layoffs, then become a specialist in a niche. I'm choosing to become a specialist in mobile development. But I'm doing this to work for myself as a freelancer. I've been working for myself as a network consultant now for 7 years. It all depends on your end goal and what interests you. Got any other questions, just reply. Hope that helps

[@Argasz]

@@RB621337 similar situation here and i think this may not be the best choice if you want to work as developer

[@RB621337]

@Argasz explain, please?

[@minmaxshorts]

@@RB621337 Plumber's won't loose their job to AI. That's for certain. Now answering your question it depends on something we don't know: how good is AI gonna get and how fast will it be. In the end we all have to take a bet on what we focus our time in the next coming years and hope that things don't get too out of hand.

[@brainites]

True. Low-code, No-code tools still haven't replaced developers. Software development is a complex process.

[@ThomasTomiczek]

Interesting. You must have seen AI before it existed.

[@RD-jr8nv]

I have used ChatGPT extensively for the last few weeks, I’ve barely used it to write a line of code, it’s just an amazing stack overflow for me, with no bullshit and virtuous mods telling you your question is dumb.

[@TravisHi_YT]

You still have to be careful, it's sometimes very incorrect. I've been using it like this too.

[@kris5645]

Exactly. The problem with chat gpt is it takes code from multiple sources, but it cannot verify if the code works. It cannot do the main task - build the code and run it. I'ts writing unverified tutorials at this point.

[@RD-jr8nv]

@@TravisHi_YT I don’t get this, ‘you have to be careful’. If you’re a decent developer you’ll look at what it produces and say ‘this is good’ or ‘this is not bad’ and correct it.

[@TravisHi_YT]

@@RD-jr8nv Maybe. I could easily see ChatGPT code being rushed into production because someone couldn't bother to verify it.

[@j4yd34d5]

Self service checkouts have been around for almost 20 years yet I've still never seen a grocery store without cashiers.

[@btm1]

I did

[@theflipper404]

Planes have had auto-pilot since 1912 and we still have plane pilots. I have seen a grocery store without cashiers... but... they usually have 3-4 people in vests working the self-checkout section lol. So its the same thing really.

[@yaroslav8717]

One thing to return a piece of code, completely another to know the project’s in and outs, maintain and develop it. Developers are not only coders, they are problem solvers.

[@jasinAmsterdam1976]

It is really hard to predict anything at this point. Just look at copilot and GPT. No one could've predicted their impact 10 months ago. And the way AI can exponentially develop, who knows what will be possible in say 3 years? Just using common sense, the dev industry will be massively shaken up by these new tools. Human creativity and intuition are powerful and maybe not easily replaced, but in my mind, if AI can do just 70% of this...companies will be very happy to replace a human who needs to be paid and pampered :D I don't want to sound all doom and gloom, this is just how I feel about it all. Being able to adapt quickly and learn, and let go of old beliefs and paradigms might be the best skills that can give an edge 🤷🏽‍♂

[@sweJEverywhere]

we all gonna turn into radioactive ashes soon

[@bishopoftroy]

I find it very adventurous to say that it will take at least 15 years when just in the past two things skyrocketed. I look back at 2007 and it looks like more modern 80s. AI is now like "the guy that she told you not to worry about", but it`s very nice for you to comfort and reassure programmers that everything`s gonna be alright.

[@StefanMischook]

Time will tell.

[@kurtthorsten4463]

I was talking in discord with my friends and opinions can split but we gave it 10 years to not be overly optimistic. maybe 15 years is the point where almost all of the work is done by ai, but as a help tool it will come into our life way earlier

[@TravisHi_YT]

AI will be automating a lot of other jobs before they get to software development. Yes it's inevitable, but from my experience with chatGPT so far it's no better than intellisense. Not only that, but there's a level of skill to get the response you want, it's not a time saver for someone who is making an app who has no experience in development.

[@stoyangarov8793]

As usual when something new comes out, the tech geeks get carried away and lose touch with reality. Please get a grip.

[@91dgross]

@@TravisHi_YT right, how come no one mentions this? if you want a true read on if chatgpt will be replacing developer jobs, just look at less technical jobs. if they aren't being replaced then why would software development get replaced.

[@DatabaseDiary]

What AI would do is introducing dummy programmer in the future, as I see most of the university/college student using the AI i.e ChatGPT to Cheat or do their homework/assignment and don't learn the code. and I would say there will be more need for programmer that are already in field than the new comers.

[@zorgivanov8685]

well i can tell you that university/college students have been cheating in their homework/assignment ever since internet and stackoverflow been around so not much change in that regard

[@DatabaseDiary]

@@qualityqprogrammer yeah, cheating from stack overflow and internet is different from cheat using AI, as AI will do 100% fo the work whereas using stack overflow or internet they have to do research and at least learn the basic to put together the code. AI will give you output with plain english.

[@edz8659]

@@DatabaseDiary if "research" means using bullshit keyword search engines and ctrl+f then that's a skill kids learn when they're twelve. That's why AI is actually a good thing for education - it removes this bullshit idea that you have to sift through a haystack looking for a needle to show your "intelligence".

[@theflipper404]

@@DatabaseDiary ChatGPT is wrong a lot of the time though. I use it daily at my job.

[@shaunweinberg2463]

Dynamic web page development will not be takne over by AI anytime soon. But ChatGPT really does help alot to speed or improve the coding.

[@nuvotion-live]

I believe the main way AI will affect me as a developer is achieving more with less time. AI as it currently exists is an intelligence amplifier moreso than an intelligence replacement. Some people ask ChatGPT stupid questions to make them laugh, some are asking it to help them engineer AGI coworkers. Good input, good output.

[@jason_v12345]

The word you're looking for I think is "isolated." But the problem of limited context can be mitigated in some cases through fine-tuning.

[@dvdragon]

AI is a new tool on the construction site to help you cut wood faster. It will not show you how to build a deck.

[@AndyRoidEU]

Unless you first ask it to explain how a deck is designed.

[@ThePandaGuitar]

Oh but it does

[@dvdragon]

@@ThePandaGuitar No. You didn't listen.

[@guinmccain2762]

Yes it will explain every possible detail if asked.

[@dvdragon]

@@guinmccain2762 Only for simple stuff.

[@notlessgrossman163]

At one time programmers fed punchcards with binary numbers into a reader to load programs into computers until interpreted and compiled languages came along to let developers focus on the problem they want to solve. Now Codex and Copilot come along, saves time writing tests, regex and functions, so we can focus on saving time and improving the quality?

[@netanelaker4437]

2:13 ChatGPT doesn't find anything on the internet because it's not connected to the internet, and also its knowledge base is until 2021.

[@Sebastian-hu7bx]

I agree that AI will not replace frontend developers overnight. However, as you already mentioned in your video, AI is very good at solving small, manageable problems. In my opinion, a website consists of many individual, logically encapsulated small components that interact in a complex interplay. The future frontend developer will rather define this interplay and make trade-offs, as you also describe in your video, and write less code manually. The real question is whether it endangers the jobs of frontend developers (in 2023/2024), and I believe the answer is more likely yes. If a company employs 10 frontend developers and suddenly tools appear that increase output, the boss will question whether they still need so many developers given the current demand. The job market will change in such a way that there will be a high demand for senior developers who are good at architecture and concepts, but less demand for those who write a lot of code. The demand in the job market will decrease as AI is such a powerful tool that smaller companies will need fewer developers. What happens when Copilot for Word and Excel is released and further developed? Will large departments that create diagrams, reports, and presentations all day still need as many employees as before? I doubt it. The same problem applies to frontend developers; we will need them in the future, but we will need much fewer than we do now.

[@geniusmind7777]

That's really a great point. And nearly 90% of all you said is super agreeable! But I have subtly different thoughts for its sub topics of your opinion. Like yes 100% agree that the job market and businesses would need more senior roles that can carry out software architecture and development concepts. The more CS minded developers would be more loved than repetitive coders (juniors), or at least fewer of coders in need. But I have a slightly different angle about the demand of developers in the future. Like, there might be more increased demand for whole levels of developers regardless senior or junior roles. It's because the demand for programming projects might be increased in line with better programming productivity with AI. A ton and ton of many more businesses in the future would transition to be more digital and more aggresively dabbed into digital development, making the most out of the great AI driven productivity innovation era. That would quickly consume the sinior developers into complex and important projects made by major corporations. And smaller companies with tight budget might struggle hiring good devs and end up having to look at mid or junior developers instead because they couldn't afford hiring senior or sinior devs are quickly dried up in the job market, simply taken away by bigger companies. There might be a whole lot more projects to be created in the future incomparably more than now, and this would easily cover the demand for junipr developers as well. The fact is not all companies can hire top notch developers. This would be similar to the future and the higher demand for devs with skyrocketed increase of digital projects would leave opportunities for junior and mid range developers too, who are less good at software architecture and concepts than seniors.

[@kris5645]

AI in future could replace writing templates like WP templates, frontend templates etc. and could cause markets like Envato market to crash or get oversaturated by AI. But custom program that is specified to clients needs will always be only codable by humans. Cause it's infinite starting params that would be have to fed to AI, and at that point the client would basically have to talk to the AI. 😀

[@jdalzate7390]

thankyou Uncle Stef, I really needed this video.

[@RioTheHitman]

Just found your content and damn I really like the way you relay information I can tell you're a really sharp individual

[@taterrhead]

I kind of disagree because even if AI replaced those type of developers (working on algorithms) ... THEY ALSO happen to be some of the smartest/most-talented and companies would simply utilize them to tackle even harder problems (with assistance of AI)

[@AndyRoidEU]

Unless the AI is faster and smarter than people at that point.

[@eafadeev]

For the algo code you need a mathemathical intuition which the general language model does not have, at least yet.

[@steveoc64]

Yeah, but chatGPT is not reasoning up any new algorithms, it’s just using an extensive database of existing code to pull up an existing implementation for a given known problem. Is cannot create a new algorithm for a new problem. As long as we have new problems to solve, we will need human programmers who can think.

[@wafercrackerjack880]

@@AndyRoidEU If that happens, it's not only developers' that are in trouble.

[@TheManinBlack9054]

Its funny but bookkeepers and accountants say the exact same thing, but about coding: that its far more likely that it will replacing coding jobs first and only then theirs as they are more complex and takes more thinking.

[@KlausHerrmann]

There is a fundamental misconception here: An AI system (like GPT-3 or the much more capable next version, GPT-4) will most likely not be able to do everything a human developer can do within the next few years. But these systems will be able to do a bulk of the coding when given a specific order. The extent to which they can create code will increase, and their capabilities to take over more complicated development tasks will also increase. Always remember: This is just the beginning of the new big wave of AI systems. They'll get more specialized and way better very fast. When 90% of the coding work can be done by AI systems in a fraction of the time, what do you think will happen? Companies will restructure their development teams around that concept and exploit it to get rid of people. A company that has 100 developers today may only need 10 developers, who essentially do the clever thinking and feed the AI. And the AI does the rest. The roles of these human developers will change drastically. Those who are proactive and can adapt will survive - the rest will vanish.

[@wm5000]

Just starting to get into this now. What should I focus on to future proof my career over the next 15 years?

[@radui7468]

I will use AI to write a new and better javascript framework every day. It will make js devs crazy.

[@nullstress]

My JavaScript will never be replaced because I write really low level vanilla JS with SIMD and bitwise instructions to give my users the best performance possible.

[@keylanoslokj1806]

Elaborate please

[@theflipper404]

@Cheddar cap

[@Glibenko]

awesome video, you inspired me to move forward and don't give up😀

[@jointherevolution5577]

im going to sign up for your boot camp!

[@mobileprofessional]

5:00 - It was refreshing to hear you speak of hardware/networking advancements reducing the need to optimize performance to the nth degree (to the point of hampering UI/UX). My current concern is with mobile networks. Until 5G is truly ubiquitous (and most people upgrade their devices), I have a feeling that mobile versions of sites will still be dealing with unwanted latency. Google's PageSpeed Insights checker likes to dunk on the mobile version of my WordPress sites. It likes static HTML sites, though LOL.

[@RodrigoRojasMoraleda]

There's a lot to talk about here. To sum it up, whatever you heard in this video, the real deal is the complete opposite and just can't be stopped. The crazy growth of these systems is just starting to show up!

[@luisfcocontreras]

Quick question regarding the program, do you have to learn PHP? Or python is fine? I am not a big fan of PHP 😅

[@gm770]

Thank you for saying it. All this effort to save a few kilo-bytes is a waste of time! As for AI, I am also a seasoned programmer and have been trying out Chat GPT for 2 weeks now. So far it has only helped me with non-coding issues, like terminology, and being able to get it to narrow down answers. But the coding stuff it gives me is very basic, and might help new comers, but has yet to help me 1 time with complex coding. It seems to be getting most of it's information from Stack Overflow, but without letting you know how confident it is on it's answer. At least with Stack Overflow, you can get a range on answers, and find what works for you.

[@vripiatbuzoi9188]

I'm also seasoned developer for 35 years and chatGPT has helped me a lot. I find it very useful for poorly documented APIs that have very little to no examples on the web and inactive community. There are several projects that I've put on back burner because there was not enough info and support available to proceed without a huge time waste. chatGPT got me going on those instantly with very good boiler plate stuff. You have to refine your question many times, work around its quirks, and 80% of the time it provides broken code in one way or another but it's enough to set you on the right path and allow discovery of things that were completely opaque before. Awesome tool in the hands of a seasoned developer. Might confuse some beginners though.

[@batchrocketproject4720]

I agree. Apart from being pretty good at structuring regex, I've found ChatGPT to be incapable of writing decent routines, despite delivering what looks like good syntax. It even makes up javascript object methods that don't exist and when you report the routine fails it explains that''s because such and such a method doesn't exist and the correct function is some other fantasy it's dreamed up. This morning I was doing some basic web scraping using curl pipped into awk procedures. I could get clean files of the required data with fewer key strokes than it took to ask for corrections to the garbage I was getting back from ChatGPT.

[@FISS007]

Thanks to AI, we'll be able to work on more projects at the same time and thus increasing our revenu :)

[@kass160]

Bro who pays you more when the actual coding is by AI. Your revenue decreases before it skyrockets 🤣

[@eafadeev]

Maybe, if you're your own boss. The employers will be demanding more for the same pay imo.

[@FISS007]

@@eafadeev What used to take you 5 hours to do (forms, layout, glue code...) will be generated in minutes using AI. So, you'll be able to take on more projects thus making more money.

[@FISS007]

@@kass160 What used to take you 5 hours to do (forms, layout, glue code...) will be generated in minutes using AI. So, you'll be able to take on more projects thus making more money. The condition here is that you work as a freelancer or as a company owner/consultant in which case you have clients not an employer.

[@eafadeev]

@@FISS007 Right, if you are working for yourself, but the employers won't be likely to pay you more, they'll just raise the expectations:).

[@dvdragon]

This video is not Stef. It was put together buy an AI that was somehow written in Ruby. j/k

[@zohaib0335]

Yes KZbin is being controlled by A.I

[@islamicsolution5618]

Should a new one learn AI or become step by step Software developer.

[@ryanquinn1257]

Algorithm writers trying to calculate time-complexity of their career span

[@BizzaroBrainBoi]

omg this video was the answer to my burning question

[@segamanable91]

A trend is your friend. It will not replace devs now, but do you see a trend? Devs' work may be simplified in the future so much to the point it'll look like cashier's work.

[@heyyrudyy404]

People just forget one simple consideration : Reality exists before we make a copy out of it.

[@tazimrahbar7882]

But slowly it will drastically reduce the demand of software developers in every category. Golden days of learning to code is over.

[@joaquin67]

If learning to code is not needed anymore, how will a human know what to ask the AI to develop? It's like saying ChatGPT will get rid of all writers, but you still need to know how to write to even use ChatGPT

[@alijvn3783]

The one thing that chat GPT can never do, is what you kind of think it will do most. It can not improve an algorithm unless the exact improvement with almost same scenario is somewhere out there....copy pasting or almost copy pasting is not what algorithm writers do...

[@giovanniherran8088]

yes

[@easygamingwwiigamingchanne729]

I tried it. It makes many mistakes.

[@Kamren331]

I feel Python is the safest program no matter how advanced AI gets. I am concentrating on HTML and CSS and creative writing.

[@dreamup8431]

I am not a programmer but I think of AI as just another level of abstraction right now. Assembly, C, Python, AI (?). But it doesn’t seem to be there quite yet. And AI has been shown to have bias in that it’s only as good as the information it has at its disposal. Will it continually improve or get more sloppy based on what’s out there. And if the AI generated content starts to approach the amount of human created content will it get better and better or naturally get stuck at a certain level. Does it have a ‘desire’ to improve? Guess that’s where human input is necessary in asking and framing the requests correctly…

[@ajimahifeanyi2784]

Hey Uncle Stef . Between Cyber Security Jobs and software developer Jobs, which do you think will be easier/ faster to be replaced by AI?

[@DatabaseDiary]

AI will only be tool, the job will not be replaced by any AI, specially development, AI cannot replace the entire end to end of software development, I play with ChatGPT and I can see there is a lot of flaw to that, surely it will reduce traffic to google and stack over flow as it can help developers with faster answer than google and stack overflow.

[@kimjongun1777]

Cyber security jobs u r much more safer there

[@khairiyusoff5040]

It is difficult to predict exactly which jobs will be replaced by artificial intelligence (AI) in the future and at what rate. Both cybersecurity and software development involve complex tasks that require a high level of skill and expertise. It is possible that certain aspects of these jobs could be automated to some extent by AI, but it is unlikely that AI will be able to fully replace human cybersecurity professionals or software developers in the near future. There are many factors that could influence the extent to which AI could potentially replace human workers in these fields, such as the development of new AI technologies, the adoption of these technologies by companies and organizations, and the willingness of workers to adapt to new roles and responsibilities as AI becomes more prevalent in the workplace. Ultimately, the impact of AI on jobs in the cybersecurity and software development fields will depend on a range of complex factors, and it is difficult to make definitive predictions about the future.

[@DatabaseDiary]

@@qualityqprogrammer AI take huge amount of time to be trained only based on the data that is available on that time a human should have already solved that problem in training data for AI to understand the problem, it does not take long for that AI to be out of date and then requires to be trained with new data generated, AI like chatGPT is only language model that is trained with Microsoft super computer with months of training, and the data was only until 2021, so chatGPT is already outdated it cannot do anything that requires data after 2021... I don't comfort myself I work in company that we have ML developers and none of them think AI will replace anything it will be just a tool, the only thing that it will harm will be college/university students that use that to get away from studying .

[@DatabaseDiary]

@@qualityqprogrammer I don't tell myself I actually have colleague who build ML and I asked same question from them, connecting to internet does not do anything to chatGPT it actually need data in certain format and that requires manual intervention by engineers to reformat data in certain way,, AI will be tool nothing more or less, like currently Software engineers using packages/framework and barely code anything from scratch that did not reduce number of developers but increased. AI will be used as tool very powerful tool, will not be able to do anything end to end, at least not with current technology and in current developers generation, what will happen in 30-40 years nobody knows, if quantum computer become common then maybe, but with current technology in Hardware it's too expensive for AI like chatGPT to be trained.

[@HikaruAkitsuki]

Open AI Codex is more comprehensive for web development than Chat GPT. There is several drop and drag web developer. But it did not replace most of the developers. Why? Because the rest of the people are scared of CODE and complex development. That's why we have job😈 Also, AI is not built to automatically built the full components of a whole function software and websites. The only we might worry is our boss and manager to abuse this to their greed. But Freelancer his always free with this.

[@AndyRoidEU]

Not built (...) ... yet.

[@selcukbayrak5606]

It is not the intelligence or complexity makes AI driven cars impossible, I think it's cost is much more bigger problem in the long term, while you can use much less resource to do some other stuff, like content writing, web design, help desk, etc

[@jurnee21485]

They've been working on self-driving cars for over a decade...... they probably won't have ai programming for another 30-50 years

[@StefanMischook]

Interesting.

[@theflipper404]

They've actually been working on self-driving cars for 2 decades. And if you count autopilot technology in planes... this has been around since 1912. It is far more advanced now then it was in 1912... and yet we still have pilots lol.

[@steveoc64]

AI would advance computing by 1000 years if it replaced Rust evangelists

[@matthewvaden3909]

I now find myself using ChatGPT to write certain kinds methods in my code now. It’s very helpful, but it is still not perfect all the time. This is where being an experienced developer will come in. But because of this, I wonder how monolithics certain types of functions or certain segments of code being written, will become if we rely too much on AI for this.

[@skavihekkora5039]

By using chatgpt you are teaching it your job, thats the main reason it's free - not for you, for those who own it - yr giving them yr knowledge free.

[@theflipper404]

@@skavihekkora5039 ChatGPT isn't actively learning though when you use it.

[@skavihekkora5039]

Using AI in full stack means you must trust the AI with all your heart and soul and then go thru absolute hell of debugging its code if it f*cks up somewhere on the way. Getting it to quickly create small, easy to validate, reusable components as building blocks for your complex application makes sense, but only if you know exactly what you need. Actually that relates to all aspects of AI - it will only be a tool, until some rich bezoses, zuckerbergses or schwabses actually merge with it - better have an escape shuttle handy then. Oh, and there will be no sentient self aware AI. At least not in the next 500 years, no matter what hypester granthunters bs-ing all around.

[@HelloThere-xs8ss]

Yes. 100.

[@HelloThere-xs8ss]

People seem to call themselves developers far too quickly

[@albinosh4dow]

No, AI is not likely to replace JavaScript developers anytime soon. AI is still in its early stages, and while there are some tools that can automate certain tasks, they are still not sophisticated enough to replace a human developer. AI may be able to assist developers in certain aspects of their work, but it is not likely to replace them entirely.

[@rstkDev]

If you are old enough, you can still remember a a game called chess and chess players. After that guy Kasparov lost to Deep Blue, he and his colleagues went extinct. Instead of learning from ai and using it to evolve their beloved game, they gave up, rolled over and started plating chess-boxing. Sad but true story.

[@maskman4821]

AI wont replace developers / engoneers / coders, but it will reduce the amount of job positions because if you are the boss and you know what openAI is capable of, you wont hire as many as developers like you do right now, I have been playing around with chatGPT these days and I have a lot of fun asking it to code my app and impressed by its capability. For one thing, openAI does not have awareness and doesnt know what is right or wrong, so it is impossible for AI to replace human jobs 😅

[@bishopoftroy]

On the contrary, the world is getting technologized so much more and so much fast that even with an AI 10 times more powerful there aren`t sufficient programmers in the world and the numbers are confirming this.

[@jwoods9659]

When GPT5 and 6 comes out you won't be able to tell if it's a person or not. Society will be screwed up.

[@maskman4821]

@@jwoods9659 I actually expect openAI gets smarter and is able to craw web in real time and fetch the latest info for us, you know 😘

[@AndyRoidEU]

Humans don't know what is right or wrong, morally or otherwise.

[@theflipper404]

@@jwoods9659 The hardware we have cannot allow AI to get that advanced. GPU based power is extremely limited, and only can do small incremental power increases. For AI to get to the level you are referring to... we need to have a ground breaking innovation in how we power graphics, data training models... etc. This seems very unlikely to occur. Quantum Computing could be the answer to the hardware limitations... and it is the answer. But Quantum Computing is in its infancy, and no where near ready to be common place.

[@91dgross]

you have swag for an older guy

[@khairiyusoff5040]

It is unlikely that artificial intelligence (AI) will replace JavaScript developers in the near future. While AI and machine learning algorithms have made significant progress in automating certain tasks, they are not yet capable of fully replacing the skills and expertise of a human developer. JavaScript is a programming language that is used to build web applications and is a crucial part of the modern internet. It requires a deep understanding of how web applications work and how to design and build efficient and reliable software. While AI algorithms may be able to assist with certain aspects of development, they cannot fully replace the creativity, problem-solving, and critical thinking that human developers bring to the table. Furthermore, the development of AI and machine learning algorithms requires a deep understanding of computer science and programming, which is typically acquired through years of study and practice. It is therefore unlikely that AI will be able to fully replace JavaScript developers in the near future.

[@AndyRoidEU]

Hello ChatGPT. Also it has 1-2 year old info.

[@batchrocketproject4720]

Professional, employed, developers need be more concerned about the rise of the 'manager class' than of the march of AI. Like every specialised profession before, programming will become a trade where managers who spout bullshit will increase their pay at the expense of yours, undermine your performance and job satisfaction with micro-management, and blame you for crap you turn out to meet their demands.

[@dreduduwa]

lol the title is a click bait, but the click was worth it! 🙃

[@bobweiram6321]

AI won't replace theoretical computer science, or "algorithm" work. It can't devise a new algorithm because it doesn't understand algorithms.

[@joecater894]

It seems unbelievable that ai could do these things , but we'll see where this rabbit hole goes.. it might just be the case that you tell ai all about the project, organisation.. feed in the data and then it will churn out the full stack solution. I know it seems weird and we're used to thinking of computers as dumb enough that we all get to keep our jobs.. we'll see. If its the case, then i just hope the new tech creates new higher level technical roles. if we look at history it has always been the case that as machines took over, more roles got produced. mechanisation created mechs and engineers , computers created IT , programmers , webdev etc... and ai hopefully will create new skill sets. If not, then we're in some trouble. Its funny, I always thought if there are intelligent aliens that have reached us, then they would be naturally way way smarter than us to be able to reach us.. maybe they just have excellent ai.

[@aneesahthequeen]

😍😍❤️❤️💙💙

[@OfoeNelson]

AI can't even generate accurate fingers on a human being how will it replace developers?

[@illegalsmirf]

YES. PLEASE. Omg I hate JavaScript so much

[@StefanMischook]

lol!

[@adamspice9076]

its like google :-)

[@kingnick6260]

AI will replace mediocre StackOverflow copy-pasters

[@VaibhavSharma-zj4gk]

Eventually most the developers(like 80%) gonna be replaced.

[@georgehope5477]

Ultimately don't we want AI to replace all jobs? Isn't that what every tool and technology has been developed for? The singularity approaches.

[@kleeclee2]

The kids who are in elementary school know how to code. If these kids know how to use chatGPT and github co-pilot then these kids who become adults one day will run the world. A kid who is really smart will probably make no so much productive programmers.

[@gerard02700]

i doubt AI = cheat tool so it will make them dumb in the long term if they use it as a cheat tool

[@-Engineering01-]

Ai will not replace anyone

[@StefanMischook]

🖖

[@edvoyce9889]

I like your content topics but your videos are way too long. Please make them max 4-5min.

[@jaywilzon1412]

Clickbait title. So tired of that. Just be real about your content people will respect it more. Clickbaiting is played out. Unsubscribed.

[@nr7343]

You same pancake, before you said its dose not replace anyone

[@liquidmobius]

I think everyone is in denial. Most programmers and software developers are going to be part of the working poor in 10 years because they'll all be out of a job.

[@geniusmind7777]

I am not a developer, I am a marketer (but knows how to program and code). I know you just want trolling here. But the fact is: when developers are out of a job is the day when 99% of people on the planet are out of a job -- when all the jobs are gone that need critical thinking, strategical decisions, human interaction and conceptional understanding like SWE (Software Engineering).

[@liquidmobius]

@@geniusmind7777 Sorry bud, no trolling here. Just the cold, hard truth of our future reality. I didn't say ALL programmers and software engineers, I said MOST. And it's not that they will be totally unemployed, it's that they'll be underemployed. And you have seriously faulty logic. Just because most programmers will be out of a job, it does not then follow that 99% of everyone else will then be also. That's absolutely ridiculous, and no one with a working brain would believe such nonsense.

[@AndyRoidEU]

I give it 6 months until it can write proper code and start replacing jobs.

[@tornikegasviani9995]

@cheddar9077 you two sound like people who started to learn web dev to make more money but then realized it's actually not that easy and now you're finding ways to justify your laziness.

[@stoyangarov8793]

@Cheddar You both need help. Extreme paranoia is a dangerous thing. Trying to reskill into a different field hahaha. Can't remember the last time I had such a good laugh.

[@focusroom_]

@@tornikegasviani9995 totally

[@theflipper404]

@@stoyangarov8793 Right... by his logic... if AI will replace PROGRAMMERS in 6 months. Then all jobs will be replaced lol. There would be nothing to re-skill in.

[@JuhaszIstvan.]

@@qualityqprogrammer LOL Do you even know how ChatGPT works? Human intelligence is not a complicated thing, but it is so non-deterministic that we won't be able to approximate it with such things like chatGPT :]

[@rajnikantdash7550]

test

[@paulbrown5839]

Sorry but you are way off the mark here. Development is far too nuanced to be automated. Code optimisation is smth different, been around for decades. If you are glueing together a web app and writing no code, this is not development. If you think your developer job can be automated out of existence, get a harder job.

[@Gecmajster123456]

I FCKN HOPE SOOO js is a joke

[@alanjudi7110]

Anything that a human can do, an AI will be able to do by 2029