Which of these skyscrapers should become reality? What do you think? 👇😎
@luism72483 жыл бұрын
Would love to see the sacrostyle in new york👌
@robbygroze55443 жыл бұрын
All of them
@catzzzz14503 жыл бұрын
Southeast Asia tallest building comparison
@SulliTheWiseMacaroon3 жыл бұрын
Stop posting videos!
@yuutoxkaixviicoi64473 жыл бұрын
No.7 how hard is it to park a helicopter?
@aethorreee94853 жыл бұрын
Engineers be like: augh the architects are being ambitious
@nextup60743 жыл бұрын
USE ENGLISH
@Z0mbieAnt3 жыл бұрын
Hahaha, yes 6:21 - Skyscrapers with varying degrees of concave surfaces? Somebody really likes grilling pedestrians and melting cars.
@bevanml3 жыл бұрын
Don't worry about the engineers - worry about the surveyors who have to peg everything!
@user-no3id7li4h3 жыл бұрын
@@nextup6074 it is english?
@bobbiusshadow69853 жыл бұрын
Wait, what .. ambitious beings ought to be architects, say the engineers?
@HAJZX3 жыл бұрын
Architects: Mimics the function of human biology. Engineers: No.
@carrotsfilmjunkyard97763 жыл бұрын
Ha ha hah
@Noodlemonkey72 жыл бұрын
Lol
@erichtomanek47393 жыл бұрын
I love how they say "sustainable" and "environmentally conscious". It's all a lie. These are vanity projects.
@constantinosbou2 жыл бұрын
So true!
@lechocolat37832 жыл бұрын
What's your point? ALL skyscrapers are vanity projects.
@ian_gao2 жыл бұрын
Any project from Dubai or the Middle East claiming to have a positive impact on the environment is just a complete laughable lie, and even if it weren't, is about the most expensive and inefficient ways to do it.
@alvexok5523 Жыл бұрын
@@lechocolat3783 He's trying to say that they're putting the importance of appearance over practicalities and sensibilities. I, as well as you it seems, personally think that they're doing all of them
@drewlovelyhell48923 жыл бұрын
How the hell is the "Squall Tower" supposed to generate energy? There's no way it actually turns by windpower, no matter what shape it is. And rotating at 0.0003 RPM isn't going to prove much.
@archsciontrismegistus41943 жыл бұрын
Yeah like architects forgot that wind, hurricanes and typhoons like tall spinning earthbound manmade objects
@playerxmaya79373 жыл бұрын
when it finally succeeded in generating energy by wind, I'm imagining everyone in there feel dizzy by the never ending spin... XD
@steven_lobo3 жыл бұрын
I just imagined the tower rotating with the velocity of a wind turbine. Work on this place will be pretty crazy xD
@boburzod3 жыл бұрын
at least it could give idea to other projects
@zelaznydesigns8743 жыл бұрын
@@archsciontrismegistus4194 imagine a hurricane while in that. Your view just progressively spins faster and faster 😂
@Morisu-Chan3 жыл бұрын
The first building would be lit, imagine living there, and always waking up to see another part of the city everyday
@dinoramos38553 жыл бұрын
@UCxlO4Utjp6jxYC3uMgxc4YA it doesn't spin that fast
@kayzeaza3 жыл бұрын
I can see something happening with the rotation and the building collapsing
@manoyski35553 жыл бұрын
If unlit it would be dark.
@glorytoamerica63323 жыл бұрын
Where would the entrances be? If it’s constantly moving there is no guarantee you could go to the right wing at any given moment.
@thomas19423 жыл бұрын
I'd love to see how they are making it function. I'm assuming wind is supposed to cause the rotation, so it will have to be easily moveable. I wonder what kind of rollers or bearings they are thinking of using that don't have too much friction or do not require more power then it is supposed to create to make it move.
@marvinmartinsYT3 жыл бұрын
You can guarantee that these won’t look the same when built than on paper.
@SargonofQueens3 жыл бұрын
You are wrong. Most buildings follow the blue prints.
@marvinmartinsYT3 жыл бұрын
@@SargonofQueens Most. Prints change on the go.
@stevenlitvintchouk31312 жыл бұрын
@@SargonofQueens Only if you can convince the government authorities to give you a permit to build the building and only if you can convince tenants to pay to rent space in it. Libeskind's original proposal for the NY World Trade Center replacement was drastically revised after objections. The spire was moved from the side to the center, and the whole upstairs garden was deleted.
@sniperlegacy06532 жыл бұрын
You are wrong bro it will look same as the picture
@Maccaa3 жыл бұрын
I can't be the only one who thinks the O-tower looks like something else? 🤔🤔
@robinchase21413 жыл бұрын
That's putting it mildly.
@generaltullius45113 жыл бұрын
Orange and black youtube
@thepatient1153 жыл бұрын
He did say at the beginning that one of the towers would have elements of human anatomy
@nazneenbegum28383 жыл бұрын
@@thepatient115 lol
@neurowayne3 жыл бұрын
That building reflect very well what young Chinese Communists care about, money, fame and sex
@Chris-vz7en3 жыл бұрын
In a 100 years, people will look at old photos of our time and say, "wow, their buildings were just a bunch of rectangles..."
@carlosandleon3 жыл бұрын
Think about why we do that bro. There's a logic behind it.
@zograf45723 жыл бұрын
Whats wrong with rectangles. Beauty is in simplicity. These new things they are building are just ugly. They are marvels of engineering, but ugly none the less.
@carlosandleon3 жыл бұрын
@@zograf4572 Balance is key. Humans want order but also variety.
@zograf45723 жыл бұрын
@@carlosandleon Most people has a very bad taste in general. When civilization enters a faze of decadence and entropy, people usually get amazed by kitsch. They become thoroughly detached from reality and therefore beauty. Harmony becomes boring and uninspiring, beauty becomes insufficient. This modern style is nothing more than aesthetical circus.
@carlosandleon3 жыл бұрын
@@zograf4572 phase* Also we're not there yet. People are still struggling. Wars are still being fought. Designs like these have been built for 70 years now. I mean the 60s were far crazier in design philosophy for sure
@catzzzz14503 жыл бұрын
0:01 Empire State Building timelapse?I never seen that before😲
@mrsarcasm68853 жыл бұрын
its computer generated
@catzzzz14503 жыл бұрын
@@mrsarcasm6885 ok
@jordanscarantino43363 жыл бұрын
Am I the only one who thinks the Sarcostyle would be the biggest eye-sour on the NYC skyline?
@67000bull3 жыл бұрын
I like the the design. but totally agree with you about the location of it .
@SFBenjaminK3 жыл бұрын
None of them beats Dubai & china , the way they going about 25-50 years from now , America gonna count as 3RD world country to visit all our f*n money goes to illegal immigrants , welfare checks , big giant cooperate offices CEO'S or Miss manage Government pockets & senators ...f*n corrupted country! they talked about these buildings for decades & more, none happens , is all B.S & they wet dreams!
@javierpacheco82343 жыл бұрын
To me it doesn't fit in new york. It looks weird, it looks blobby and here in New York which kind of looks like Gotham city. This building doesn't belong here in New York, something better can be designed instead of this blobby piece.
@javierpacheco82343 жыл бұрын
@@SFBenjaminK you clearly don't know why New York is considered to be the best city in the world. Because New York has great architecture. You should read history of New York on how it was made. This city is a combination of great European architecture and modern architecture. Dubai is a city of Highways doesn't care about streets or creating towns their cities are not gonna be a great place to live and it shows since people live only in the rural areas of Dubai that are far from the city because they designed the city for tourism and not their locals. I also don't like China they have great history but have forgotten their architecture becuase they wanna copy the west of architecture and once again they are building for a while. All the hype is going to China becuase they don't care about their architecture they just wanna create cities that are a mess and just ugly.
@jordanscarantino43363 жыл бұрын
@@javierpacheco8234 The Sarcostyle just doesn't look good. The inner "anatomy" bit looks like a bunch of dildos glued together. & yeah, China sometimes copies western styles of architecture, but they are now finding their own style. The US copied European architecture before finding their own style, as well.
@flare51573 жыл бұрын
The Gehry project is my favorite 🤩
@CityGeek3 жыл бұрын
Your videos are amazing! Congrats on 150k subscribers!
@MegaBuildsYT3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@Samuelsocool1233 жыл бұрын
@@MegaBuildsYT I just saw this on my recommendations and I'm actually glad.
@TehAarex3 жыл бұрын
These designs are creative and cool, unlike all others. I hope that there will be more variety on buildings in next few decades! My favorites are Tower C, Hengqin International Center, and Squall Tower.
@alvexok5523 Жыл бұрын
I think by the late 21st century, turn of the 22nd, cities all over the world will be full of these unique futuristic buildings. The world's tallest building will be over 1 mile, or 2 kilometers high. Which city, I don't know, but there will be one. It may be either in NYC, Dubai, Shanghai, or Tokyo
@charliemontero52173 жыл бұрын
Most of this skyscrapers would never see the light too expensive
@asianthor3 жыл бұрын
In China, yes.
@shahrukhkhan83073 жыл бұрын
dubai will complete it's towers. they did before
@amerlad3 жыл бұрын
really... too expensive?... towers? that's literally the only expensive type of project countries would spend on without even thinking. if you said infrastructure like roads or actual useful things then yes. but rich countires love nothing more than to flex their wealth with skyscrapers *ahem* UAE
@pulsatingsausageboy20763 жыл бұрын
@@amerlad You’re gay
@broccoli27843 жыл бұрын
the most sustainable thing you can do with buildings is just update the stuff you already have instead of using more resources on new buildings. why not upgrade already standing skyscrapers?!
@PartiallyC0rrect2 жыл бұрын
Because then you’re limiting yourself to the boundaries set by the old methods, you’ll never get innovative creations. If we only upgraded current towers (which is already constantly happening, keep in mind this is a video only about skyscrapers being built not improved, that wouldn’t get likes) we would never get towers that could have a negative carbon footprint by being able to rotate.
@Nosphal2 жыл бұрын
Do you have any idea of the cost of modifying an entire building ?
@javierpacheco82342 жыл бұрын
@@PartiallyC0rrect not limiting yourself i think he is right, there are buildings that are vacant right now and could be used for housing or something else.
@richardsears46653 жыл бұрын
The squall tower looks like the turbine in that scene in the movie Skyscraper when Will jumps through the turbine
@TheLuxurist3 жыл бұрын
These buildings are magnificent! I do genueinly hope that we cann see them becoming reality!
@lorenzosoro4533 жыл бұрын
Are ugly, like the other after 1945. We are in decadence and the worst isn't arrived yet
@michael45763 жыл бұрын
@@lorenzosoro453 🥴
@zograf45723 жыл бұрын
@@lorenzosoro453 Agreed. Contemporary architecture is just ridiculously ugly. Its getting to the point where i want to ask these people, "do you have eyes?".
@DavidLopez-zn2vt3 жыл бұрын
I like the Sarcostyle and the Tower C building for New York City!
@davanshamzeen5023 жыл бұрын
Love this channel
@MegaBuildsYT3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@caencris34073 жыл бұрын
X2
@eight22903 жыл бұрын
X10000)0000000000000000000000000000
@adrianganea48893 жыл бұрын
Toronto and New York are my favourites
@Someone-rb5ke3 жыл бұрын
the more strange, the more modern
@LC-pv9xh3 жыл бұрын
I think I like the Tower C most of all on the list.
@noodengr3three8253 жыл бұрын
The stacked boxes in Toronto look great
@easyteh4getperson3 жыл бұрын
the wind turbine is a nice idea but living close to a wind farm, they break down often. i cant imagine trying to fix that with a whole building on top
@leapednote71743 жыл бұрын
Congratulations on 150k subscribers!
@MegaBuildsYT3 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@futurecitieschannel3 жыл бұрын
Honestly, I don't think any of them would become reality. I really hope some of them become reality though, and I'm certain some will in the future.
@Argonaut1213 жыл бұрын
I live in Toronto and I think the Gehrig project will get built,,
@heinrichhimmler37813 жыл бұрын
Chinese Skyscrapers Build For Sure
@TruckTaxiMoveIt3 жыл бұрын
Tower C is absolutely gorgeous on so many levels I would love build a building like that
@benwalter48423 жыл бұрын
NYC has a few potential interesting skyscrapers including the Osmosis Tower (one in this video), the Big Bend, 2 WTC, and the Mangove Tower. Possibly a few more as well. Also currently has the Janga Tower and the Spiral Tower.
@orliemacatuno33002 жыл бұрын
All bldgs you features are Beautiful & Innovative in Concept if all will put in reality that wil be perfect.After all the ultimate fulfilment of any design is when you see in actual exist not just in paper or model
@orliemacatuno33002 жыл бұрын
I hope in near future,one of those famous architectural firm will use the shape W.After all that the safest letter in English aphabet,it always there' s a backup like computer files.Double U
@krisgonynor6892 жыл бұрын
Would a scaled down, lightweight version of the "Squall Tower" work as a wind generator? It would seem to be a much sturdier design in practice to handle storms and such. Maybe even coat the exterior parts with solar electric panels for when the wind isn't blowing? It would rotate at a slower speed but with the greater mass moved by the wind, it could generate lots of power - with the bonus that airplanes, drones and birds could see the structure as it moves and prevent collisions. It would also look nicer and could be placed in more suburban and urban areas - like a giant sculpture dedicated to a green energy future.
@matthandford77553 жыл бұрын
I absolutely love these new designs and developments. Keep it up companies and architects!
@अंकुशझा-स2ङ3 жыл бұрын
Looking at big marvellous bulidings always motivates me to start a construction company lol
If it's only 1 revolution per 2 days, how does that produce energy? I like the ability to see 360 but that will cost them energy not produce it. It might be better to have the rain runoff be the generator,
@hidden72493 жыл бұрын
they probably would do that too but it just has an insanely high resistance so every inch moved generates a ton
@tixximmi3 жыл бұрын
@@hidden7249 Yes but you need a lot of wind to move those tons. And at such a low speed, it can't generate enough electrons.
@ivangalik78483 жыл бұрын
friction resistance to the rotation needs to be equal to wind force otherwise it would not move at all. Once wind overcomes the resistance there is useful energy extractable but i think it is not very good idea to create complicated mechanisms when you can connect the building to nearby offshore windmill farm with cable :). Much better efficiency.
@tixximmi3 жыл бұрын
@@ivangalik7848 And that still doesn't work.
@tixximmi3 жыл бұрын
@@hidden7249 No that''s not how it works. It works when a magnetic field moves around copper to generate electrons. Do you realize that the amount of copper to surround this building would be 3X the worlds production for a year. And then that magnetic field is moving about 3 inches a minute. That's not going to produce that much electricity at all. And if the wind isn't up to at least a high enough speed the building wont' move at all. I would like to see their numbers on it but they won't give them to you.
@caribbb3 жыл бұрын
Tower C looks most interesting to me although all are good.
@2b5226 ай бұрын
WE LOVE Top Luxury VIDEOS!❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊😊
@robandrews48153 жыл бұрын
What I wouldn't like about living in one of these skyscrapers, is that you can't open the windows. Now, I understand about the high winds, but I don't like breathing air through machinery. I want real . fresh air from time to time
@andrzejloza92053 жыл бұрын
A new language has been created to explain to the unlearned the foundations of ugly projects.
@glennelliott7083 жыл бұрын
Unfortunately for the architects in Dubai, their buildings are isolated pinnacles surrounded by acres of hot pavement.
@nextup60743 жыл бұрын
Lots of super tall skyscrapers. No real CITY.
@r.e.m.beauty4883 жыл бұрын
@@nextup6074 so strange to me
@garystrankman38413 жыл бұрын
Yes all for show that are environmentally unfriendly and even more people unfriendly.
@es33593 жыл бұрын
Architects need to stop relying so much on glass for their designs. Glass is less environmentally friendly in so many ways, including its poor insulative properties, and the well documented harm these glass walls have on migrating birds. It also is much more energy and water intensive to keep clean.
@nextup60743 жыл бұрын
Uhhh....how do you see out of a building with no glass (windows)??
@SD-ed8is3 жыл бұрын
@@nextup6074 Through windows. With these skyscrapers it seem as if all the "walls" are made from glass.
@zylnexxd8423 жыл бұрын
Stfu
@javierpacheco82343 жыл бұрын
They also cause streets to get hotter becuase glass reflects.
@MrBuild93573 жыл бұрын
Dear Engineers, Have you ever estimated the length at least one time per project?
@gwalters47573 жыл бұрын
While I like some of the designs, how is it even feasible for Dubai to continue building so many skyscrapers? They don’t have the population to sustain that amount of office or residential space and apparently many of the buildings in Dubai are sitting there half empty...
@richardscathouse3 жыл бұрын
As the oil dries up there will be less money to just throw away. On egos
@punjabimundaUK3 жыл бұрын
Very true. Dubai cannot sustain this for long
@tyyskarohn44653 жыл бұрын
Despite the oil industry sinking a little in Dubai, and many buildings being empty, Dubai *can* actually sustain itself like this for years to come because the tourist rate has increased by about 47,000% since 2010 and with more buildings coming every so often (for money conservation purposes), the tourism industry in Dubai and the whole country will explode.
@richardscathouse3 жыл бұрын
@@tyyskarohn4465 tourists? With what, half-full A380s
@swwdhcool37993 жыл бұрын
@@richardscathouse After the Virus Brooo
@emiljayatileke4163 жыл бұрын
Really hope the Gehry building gets built in Toronto before he passes away.....
@Yawehplaneswalker6163 жыл бұрын
I kind of found that one to be the least inspiring of the list.
@pc1683 жыл бұрын
@@Yawehplaneswalker616 That's already the prettiest by Gehry standard.
@emiljayatileke4163 жыл бұрын
@@Yawehplaneswalker616 the original iteration was much more bold. This one is much more watered down.
@yggdrasil90393 жыл бұрын
Interesting ideas. Still hoping for the pyramidal/conic/torus-shaped high rise tower that is impossible to fall off and that you can safely climb down the outside of.
@bobbiusshadow69853 жыл бұрын
.. and add a slide going from top to bottom.
@frankdean72653 жыл бұрын
Nobody becomes a millionaire or a billionaire by working for others and depending on them. Good investment brings millions of dollars and consistency brings billions; the market is all about bitcoin at the moment.
@raymondjefferson99143 жыл бұрын
Well, Investment without an adequate knowledge on whatever you're investing in, is a total wait of resources and time. One should first strive to gather enough knowledge in any field he or she chooses to invest in.
@samueljones4203 жыл бұрын
@@raymondjefferson9914 you're very right. A lack of the require skills and knowledge is disadvantageous to any kind of investment. It shouldn't just be about investing but making profit too.
@ausleanemmanuel35323 жыл бұрын
Investment is paramount but doing it rightly comes with extra blessings and dividend
@jasminedavid88523 жыл бұрын
Speaking of investing, forex trading is the best business in the world right now with the ever raising amount of bitcoin. I know a couple of friends who makes a lot of money weekly trading the financial market
@jasminedavid88523 жыл бұрын
For anyone building for posterity I think crypto is the next gold but the problem is scammers are everywhere.
@jameskelmenson19273 жыл бұрын
My favorite is the Oppo Infinity Loop. In architecture it almost never makes sense to build an upside down trapezoid. If you want a diagonal wall. It makes more sense to put less weight on top and more on the bottom, much like a pyramid. Thats not just for structure, but because if the ceiling has more square feet than the floor then thats a lot of space you cant walk in, cant furnish, and still have to climate control. The Oppo building is by far the most elegant example of this idea in the entire world, besides maybe Gehry. Not to mention, how many non phallic skyscrapers are there. Bonus bonus, you know what it looks like
@serpico16163 жыл бұрын
Looks like they sniped it from the Opera browser lol
@roymejias9033 жыл бұрын
Asombroso, me gustan todas, especialmente el primer rascacielos que es el giratorio.
@davetv47053 жыл бұрын
Beautiful innovations! I hope they all come to fruition.
@christoph22003 жыл бұрын
funny when you have to look for the entrance every day for number 1 xD
@eovarendre78773 жыл бұрын
Some of these structures are truly mindboggling. Now design something that's sustainable, beautiful and social. Complexes where thousands of people can have a decent roof over their heads, utilities, green and liveable spaces....A city with beautiful ivory towers that are surrounded by medieval slums is not a good city to live in.
@FabioSilva-hi1ek3 жыл бұрын
I want to see the sarcosryle building in the future
@planmet3 жыл бұрын
Couldn't we interlink many of the existing skyscrapers with pedestrian tubes, hanging gardens, skybridges and funiculae and create a multilevel city with greater connectivity?
@sob-iLs3 жыл бұрын
This is like travelling 200 years into the future. These types of buildings will be common place.
@bb21again.673 жыл бұрын
What beautiful looking buildings.
@zograf45723 жыл бұрын
Beautiful???? What?
@javierpacheco82343 жыл бұрын
They're gross. Stop sugarcoating and call it ugly.
@luxuryvision78463 жыл бұрын
*Forget the mistake. Remember the lesson!!*
@jacobbernard13933 жыл бұрын
I admire the boldness of Sacrostyle's design, but I hate it, lol. Tower C is lovely, though, and I hope it sees completion. Zaha Hadid is the best.
@skurinski3 жыл бұрын
Take a shot every time he says "sustainable"
@HuggableLoveablePlushies3 жыл бұрын
Me: Fucking dies halfway through the video. 😅
@yumenoarts84813 жыл бұрын
O tower have an amazing design for their tower
@ayaboga3 жыл бұрын
This video featured skyscrapers of various construction statuses, ranging from just an idea (that will never be built), proposal (that might be built), under constructions, and already completed! The video would be better if it at least made some distinction in this regard.
@bactanite3 жыл бұрын
The skyscrapers of 100 years ago such as the Woolworth Building and the Chrysler Building are better looking than anything built in recent years.
@javierpacheco82343 жыл бұрын
Yeah they really are.
@primitivesurvivalthinking3 жыл бұрын
Love this channel beautiful very - nice videos
@catzzzz14503 жыл бұрын
Hello from Malaysia!🙂
@MegaBuildsYT3 жыл бұрын
Hey :D
@kengwengloke65623 жыл бұрын
Ya me too
@azizah60azi333 жыл бұрын
Me too😁
@catzzzz14503 жыл бұрын
@@azizah60azi33 😀
@azizah60azi333 жыл бұрын
@@catzzzz1450 😁✌️
@benjaminbowkley26643 жыл бұрын
The "O" tower is in the Mobius strip shape. Not an infinity loop.
@MarkSeemann3 жыл бұрын
The O Tower doesn't look like a Möbius strip to me. Consider the shot from directly above. From that angle, there's no twist in the surface. What's an 'infinity loop', by the way? I'm not familiar with that term in a geometric context.
@danzigvssartre3 жыл бұрын
Is the infinity loop not the Mobius Strip?
@drewlovelyhell48923 жыл бұрын
Nah, a Mobius strip only twists once, 180°. This design twists a second time in the opposite direction. So it's just a bent strip.
@Uzumaki-tj4tl3 жыл бұрын
Tower c is beautiful in my opinion and the remaining ones r also amazing .
@memesfarsi31113 жыл бұрын
Dubai be like: build tallest skyscrapers USA be like:build most useful skyscraper East Asia be like: *build the most beautiful and gorgeous skyscrapers in the world*
@horatio11593 жыл бұрын
Take this like
@venkataraokanduri70543 жыл бұрын
Sarcostyle is my favourite weird looking building
@punjabimundaUK3 жыл бұрын
The new Egypt skyscraper is something to behold... too beautiful
@moosefactory1333 жыл бұрын
i like the Squall tower the best. Leave it to the UAE to come up with some of the most unique and interesting building designs.
@HuggableLoveablePlushies3 жыл бұрын
I agree.
@Tyrim3 жыл бұрын
I'm courious how fast the squall tower's bearings will give up 🤔
@brandhubsaynotocopys7903 жыл бұрын
If we use glass and scalar panels one after the other, can it be
@KindnessIsKarma3 жыл бұрын
7:30 environmentally friendly materials? Wow, I’m living in Mars. I’ll visit one day The Earth to see this.
@drewlovelyhell48923 жыл бұрын
"Sarcostyle" seems like a very inefficient use of it's volume.
@anywhereelse25803 жыл бұрын
Same style as No. 4 Hengqin International Center already built in Bangkok Thailand is the Central Embassy Bangkok by AL_A, since 2014.
@TheReaver662 жыл бұрын
The squall tower would cause so much drama 😂 can't imagine working there and spilling coffee everyday
@avrinrose545711 ай бұрын
In my fictional world, all this projects already finished and successful
@marczimmerman8524 Жыл бұрын
They're building some real JUNK.
@IndySidhu883 жыл бұрын
Architects: I really enjoyed the process of the design. Engineers: I really enjoyed the process of building the design… not.
@glennelliott7082 жыл бұрын
“The architects hope”. Pretty well sums it up.
@nadeemtajraja23133 жыл бұрын
Beautiful ❤️❤️👏👏👏👏👏Well done 👍
@Tehkenny13 жыл бұрын
Love the look of Tower C and Sarcostyle
@zoeliu13503 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: China has a flower island
@pulsatingsausageboy20763 жыл бұрын
Fun fact: You’re gay
@yaoreivashiwo54323 жыл бұрын
You're right, I've watch it, an it's amazing.
@sterlinsilver3 жыл бұрын
That spinning tower is neat and all, but... how do you get in?
@muscledavis54343 жыл бұрын
Run around it real fast and at the right moment jump on it
@richardscathouse3 жыл бұрын
Run, real fast
@Geoappleman78672 жыл бұрын
this is so satisfying
@eriqmav2 жыл бұрын
I love frank gehry's designs and I hope those towers (gehry project) will be built
@CodyWoofter112 жыл бұрын
That wind turbine one seems legit!
@DavidLopez-zn2vt3 жыл бұрын
Hi Again I also like the Gehry Project building.
@Monorail-Beyond-the-Veil2 жыл бұрын
At 1:15 - the Squall Tower. VERY interesting concept, but I will believe it actually spins ONLY when I see it spin. Sounds like a bunch of hype to me.
@imjody3 жыл бұрын
That Oppo tower is beautiful.
@BrandNerd233 жыл бұрын
An architect’s dream is an engineer’s nightmare! 😝
@proringz2 жыл бұрын
The new W Hotel in Sydney due to be completed in 2022, is shaped like two butterfly wings and is also up there as the most interesting upcoming designs.
@dumbguy93863 жыл бұрын
I find it difficult to beleive any of these will ever be built but the Squall Tower stands out as an example of architectural vaporware.
@muara8954 Жыл бұрын
Zaha Hadid always presents a very futuristic design and a sustainable future concept.
@sanglierbenjamin86173 жыл бұрын
My favorite: Number 3 : Sarcostyle
@bhajansingh88193 жыл бұрын
Please make video on: What happened to india tower
@Rohit-cj6eb3 жыл бұрын
Ye konsa tower hai
@JustChillingNahhhhMean3 жыл бұрын
Affordable living appartement, How much will it cost? 3k-4k per month?
@richardscathouse3 жыл бұрын
Exactly
@rich_t3 жыл бұрын
Or about a gizzilion lei. 🙂
@JustChillingNahhhhMean3 жыл бұрын
@@rich_t or lots of lots of Ruble
@oliputnik3 жыл бұрын
Good video. Thank you for sharing.
@javierpacheco82343 жыл бұрын
The uglification of the world.
@bristonknight93153 жыл бұрын
@ Javier Pacheco - The best opinion here! I totally agree...
@FablestoneSeries2 жыл бұрын
the sacrostyle looks like an eye-soar. Buildings need to share their environment and share a style.
@teachercliere71592 жыл бұрын
The Oppo Infinity Loop is my personal favorite. An upside down trapezoid is virtually never a good idea in building. If you want a diagonal wall, here is the place to be. It makes more sense to place more weight on the bottom and less on the top, similar to a pyramid. There is not only for structural reasons, but also because if the ceiling is larger than the floor, that is a lot of room you can't move in, decorate, and yet have to keep cool. Apart from Gehry, the Oppo building is by far the most exquisite implementation of this concept in the world. Not to mention the number of non-phallic towers. You've seen it before, so you know what it looks like.