World War Three Scenario - Ukraine

[@hellheaven-dy2bz]

1:50 "THE END"

[@Edvit40]

this video is actually so well made, you can see how you improve at mapping throughout the video (also im immensely worried that the people in the comments are hyped for this to happen.. come on)

[@jvalcor5649]

@@Edvit40 yes thanku!

[@Naddnipriansky_Editor]

Great animation as always) I'm waiting for a full-scale video on World War 3

[@jvalcor5649]

@@Naddnipriansky_Editor Next video! Frfr.

[@RyderBeeler]

Bring out the popcorn boys!

[@Bartholomew-h9q]

Okay

[@BurgundyFan]

hype for that day

[@jvalcor5649]

It came!!!!

[@NorthumbriaMapping]

peak

[@jvalcor5649]

Yes

[@Bartholomew-h9q]

Welp cant wait to see it release

[@NorthumbriaMapping]

Lets go its out

[@jvalcor5649]

frfr!!!!!

[@NorthumbriaMapping]

@ The 2 best mappers in one comment fr?

[@mundord6042]

Very nice

[@jvalcor5649]

Thanku!

[@Kongolese_Empire]

I am so impatient

[@jvalcor5649]

You need wait no longer!!!

[@Kongolese_Empire]

@jvalcor5649 I saw that live, you make Great content and animation

[@Kongolese_Empire]

@jvalcor5649 can you also make an African front for ww3

[@jvalcor5649]

@ I was plan in on it being Europe only, but I could add more fronts. I’m not sure, though. I was also planning on making more parts of my Kaiser Europa series along side ww3. Like the collapse of Austria Hungary.

[@Kongolese_Empire]

@@jvalcor5649 oh yes I saw this too but since I don't know the kaiserreich lore I mostly stick to world war three

[@scscxcff]

Why didn’t Ukraine liberate Berdyansk?

[@cuberrt]

Bold of you to assume that Ukraine has the capabilities to launch an offensive on just one axis, let alone the entire frontline. I admire the effort put into the video, though.

[@jvalcor5649]

@@cuberrt Yeah it’s not meant to be realistic. This is kind just the trigger for the mian video, ww3, anyways.

[@cuberrt]

@@jvalcor5649 No harm in that.

[@Mythical.European.mapper123.-]

@@cuberrt It is realistic as if you didn't notice russia lost all of it's best units in Bakhmut and now continues to lose more profesional units in Pokrovsk, while in Kursk it's literally a meat grinder, therefore Ukraine not just could, "Will" counter attack russia at some point

[@cuberrt]

@@Mythical.European.mapper123.- And you don't mention the prevalent manpower shortages in the Ukrainian army, while Russia is still able to replace its losses. There have even been numerous reports of Ukrainian soldiers mutinying and surrendering to the Russians. Not to mention, with Trump winning the election, there is a high likelihood that he will severely reduce, or outright stop aid to Ukraine come inauguration, which would make a victory near impossible. "Losing professional units in Bakhmut." The Battle of Bakhmut was predominantly fought by the Wagner group, and they were not "professional soldiers" but merely convicts forced to serve in the group with little to no combat experience, nor equipment (as Prigozhyn made so clear). As for Pokrovsk, I have no rebuttal, that is a high likelihood. When it comes to Kursk, that was probably the biggest blunder in Ukraine's war effort since the start of the war. They transferred troops away from the Pokrovsk front in a gambit to force Russia to do the same, except they didn't, and that's what caused the relatively large tactical breakthrough in that direction, with the front only stabilizing recently. You speak as if Russia is the only party taking losses, but this is not the case. The Kursk front was brutal for both sides until it settled into relative stalemate.

[@Mythical.European.mapper123.-]

It is unrealistic as if Kyiv got nuked Ukrainian resistance would get bigger than ever and Nato almost certaintly join the war after that happens, and anyways didn't the US say that if russia nukes Ukraine they will get nuclear striked back? and also if Nato joins immideatly then they will also send the troops immideatly, and the Ukrainian army would halt the russian army that will try to advance.

[@jvalcor5649]

@@Mythical.European.mapper123.- The use if tactical atomics may gauss a rise in resistance, but having 4 of their biggest cities nuked would cripple the Ukrainian war effort. However the population’s resistance would go up, which is why partisan activity jumped as soon as the nukes were dropped. Also note the video is for entertainment and not meant to be realistic. If it were, it may not be as fun as the war may be cut short due to everyone dying in nuclear hell, or Russia doesn’t perform well enough for entertaining content.

[@Mythical.European.mapper123.-]

@jvalcor5649 fair but why Donetsk instead of Lviv or Kharkiv if Donetsk has pro russian separatist population? Aren't they basically nuking themselves?

[@jvalcor5649]

@@Mythical.European.mapper123.- Probably because I didn’t look THAT deep into it 😭 I made this video to portray a somewhat feasible way for the Third World War to begin. I just thought “well that’s a major city so let’s have that be nuked.” Again this video isn’t meant to be perfectly 100% realistic, and I don’t think a single video out there is. It’s realistic enough. I do appreciate that you pointed that out though, so I can keep it in mind for the rest of the video with partisan activity and such. It also is something new I learned.

[@hellheaven-dy2bz]

did the ukranians just steal the finnish song

[@jvalcor5649]

@@hellheaven-dy2bz It’s a parody.

[@hellheaven-dy2bz]

@jvalcor5649 ok

[@ChikenNutshell]

Need support?

[@jvalcor5649]

@@ChikenNutshell what kind?

[@OzzN_]

W

[@jvalcor5649]

yess!