WoWS: Legends - Enterprise - Premium Ship Review

[@sirdiealot53]

Even after all these years still love seeing a notification for your vids. ❤

[@tacticangel]

@@sirdiealot53 I appreciate it, and I love to see.familiar names in the comments year after year. Thank you.

[@Scot-land]

I second that best world of warships legends KZbin creator bar none

[@FatGuyGaming2001]

Come for the history, stay for the review

[@tacticangel]

If you've got the lion's share of an hour, why not?

[@Tyrius8]

Tacticangel, you are the absolute best CC please make more of these videos. Every time I get a new ship or start to like a ship that I didn't at first, I look for your review first bc A: the lore which is the best part and B: the awesome detailed look into builds. There are a lot of great shops I wish you were telling me about rather than A aron or spartan. All you ever hear out of them is (this game sucks bc of every body else and I carry the team and it's never my fault blah blah blah.) You are positive and your history sections are perfect. I hope to see you more man. you are the GOAT!

[@tacticangel]

Thanks, again, Tyrius. I'm going to try to keep trucking with the ship reviews and doing the best I can. Between the research and the steps I put into each review, they do tend to take a while to make. I should have one more next week, though I wouldn't pretend that Vallejo is something a lot of people will be interested in. Actually, if I really think about it, I really ought to do something else with my time, but I already put in the research. 😄

[@Donuts2DollarsGaming]

Another great review Tactic, looking forward to the next buff 😂

[@tacticangel]

You and me both, Donuts! Thanks for stopping by after your stream.

[@Th3Mast3rL0ck]

11:04 having slow torps and a great turning radius means cross drop potential ( i had a cv god as my red enterprise captain)

[@tacticangel]

I tend to do that in Kaga. I think the speed and range might be an issue, but I could see how it might work. It certainly wouldn't be something I would even expect, so hope it works for you. 👍

[@Tyrius8]

and I hope to see you out there one day. on my team preferably. lol. I've had the pleasure of sinking spartan elite 43 and i've had the pleasure of serving right alongside of wowslegendsmemes, but I have not seen you yet, sir, and I cannot wait for that day. Maybe you can do one on the legendary could have been Montana classes. we have 4 out of 5 of them now. (even though I don't think that's what they are going to do with the Louisiana) thank you for your videos, sir.

[@Ranzoe813]

Don't hype yourself to meet your favorite cc...often I'll have awfully games when guts like tactic or others show(legends is a small enough community you will run into someone play long enough)..I Syke myself out and usually potato cc games😢...only showed a brief moment of badassery in front of Aron who ive encountered enough to lose jitters.. I've got into bb brawls w/ spartan although those always ended undecided w/ one or both disengaging after a bit

[@tacticangel]

It's cool. I mean, I recognize more than a few names when playing. I generally prefer those people to be on my team so that I don't feel bad about sinking anyone. 😄 That said, I've seen it go pretty poorly on both sides of it. Usually someone giving the old "protect the designated target!" before the game starts is a good indicator that someone's about to play the game a little funny because I'm there. I also remember a Nelson potatoed pretty hard in order to try to kill me, only to send me a note about how he loves the channel, that he usually doesn't play so poorly, but that he just had to try to kill me (which I still think is a strange way of showing his appreciation). That said, we all have bad games too, sometimes... for a lot of different reasons (trying a silly build, being focused, dumb luck... alcohol...). 😅

[@Scot-land]

Could you possibly make a updated review on the independence please

[@tacticangel]

It's... possible. I would probably hope to see there be an additional opportunity to obtain her before doing it and also for the carrier situation to more or less even itself out. Right now, they still seem in flux.

[@tacticangel]

As improbable as it might have seemed when you asked, I actually did this. 😄 Hope you enjoy the video.

[@tomb_stone1185]

love your work keep it up mate

[@bronnerx5991]

As usual I’m not a huge CV fan/player, and it’s sounding like this ship is not going to change that opinion (not expecting any CV will). Since the switch to mostly T8 campaigns, I try not to skip anything that is not direct cannon fodder for Legendary tier that lands in a campaign, so I did get this ship. Definitely going to keep her in port unless I need some mission cards completed in a CV, so I guess it’s nice to have more options that I didn’t have to grind the TT for is a positive! 😅 As always, great analysis and review! I’m not sure where these recent CV balance changes will take us. Playing anywhere aside from the back of the map is incentivized a bit more at least, so the CV gameplay should be a bit more dynamic at least (both playing as and against).

[@tacticangel]

What are the odds on whether there will be a carrier ministry of balance entry with the next update? I'd imagine that it would be 10:1 that something will get changed. Will Enterprise? Is that 50/50? I don't know, but yeah, if you just need a "carrier" to do a few bureau missions here and there, she'll definitely pass, particularly if you are a fellow man of culture (and do most of those in AI). 😄 I would prefer the game didn't have CVs, still. That said, I've got 1000 games in them. Sometimes they are quite relaxing. Best seat in the house to wonder what in the world the rest of your team is doing.

[@bronnerx5991]

@@tacticangel a “man of culture, indeed”… I do tend to play them in AI, if possible for those mission cards. Though fair point on the change in perspective… and being the best position for pondering what the other folks on the team are up to.

[@iamsuzerain3987]

I almost never play Carriers but did play my first game in Enterprise today. Don't think it's a bad ship and I scored better than expected...just don't enjoy playing Carriers. Great overview as always, enjoyed watching👍🇺🇲

[@tacticangel]

I'm going to give a little bit of the credit to myself appropriately lowering expectations. 😄 Best of luck if you continue to play her.

[@rubberduckybdc6489]

Tactic Angel is secretly Ryan Reynolds.

[@tacticangel]

You guys have no idea how hard it is to make wildly popular movies, run a football club, push my gin, and still put this much effort into Legends.

[@ftlnetwork6067]

I understand where you are coming from and it is underwelmimg. I ran it with king then with piccard and it way better with piccard. After the small buff and leveling up piccard it is a menace. I love it and as a CV main it is my favorite. They way it deletes cruisers and put a beating on BBs with torpedoes is enough for me.

[@tacticangel]

I had played a few games of Graf Zeppelin and August von Parseval before making this, plus the less comperable Lexington and Saipan, and the whole time I was thinking "this would be easier in anything else." Then I look at my notes and the numbers seemed to back that up. Not trying to take anything away from anyone. Glad you like Enterprise. I just wish it was a better ship.

[@johnapostolou1469]

Hi Tacticangel, you can use Jean-Luc Picard commander if complete the free mission of Star Trek

[@jamesmejia9249]

I’ve played A LOT of games in the Big E. Surprisingly performs much better than the stats suggest. Such a historically awesome ship tho so if they’re gonna buff it again that would be awesome haha. Side note I think radar or something would be a super cool gimmick. Lines up with history 🤷🏼‍♂️

[@tacticangel]

@@jamesmejia9249 plane based radar would be a cool gimmick now that they messed with the spotting mechanics... potentially pretty game-breaking, but I like the historical tie-in for sure. I might have to pass that one on... not that it stands much of a chance even with my support.

[@jamesmejia9249]

@@tacticangel that would be sick. And CVs are absolutely helpless against a rushing DD now. So it would be somewhat a fair balance or at least defensive measure

[@dieselfusion9964]

good stuff. hopefully she gets a major buff.

[@slowmoeent21]

I like how you caught yourself from saying a bad word with a cough 😆😅😂🤣

[@tacticangel]

I mean... it is BS. 😅

[@reidyo5404]

How do you move your ship using the map? Didn’t know you could do that lol. Anyone know how to do it on console/mobile?

[@tacticangel]

I want to say it's square on the DualShock, whatever button is on the left side of the xbox controller, and on on mobile I want to say it was double tapping a square.

[@thosedangfreakalopes2589]

First match in this ship I had 140k damage and 3200 base XP. Much better than people say

[@sirdiealot53]

Yeah I got 180k 4 kills after the buff. Still lost smdh

[@tacticangel]

I'm glad you like her. She is a CV, so she is going to be the most powerful ship on your team. That said, I've just played enough CVs that I couldn't escape the feeling "this would be easier in almost anything else," and that feeling mapped neatly onto the stats. That said, you won't see too many 3200 Base XP games in my ship reviews, unless the ship is free. 😎

[@jadensmit9127]

Did they buff it?​@@sirdiealot53

[@wastelander89]

After getting enterprise i like saipan way more

[@sirdiealot53]

It’s much better after the buff

[@tacticangel]

There's no doubt it helps. It's probably not worth recording a new video over 2 more planes and a 24% more AP damage. Honestly, I found it funny that even when looking at the numbers afterwards, that none of the comparisons I made had changed (still fewer planes, still a low HP airgroup over the course of a game, still less AP damage potential, with no other revisions). Frankly, I think all CVs are kind of silly and overpowered at this point. I just don't like that Enterprise is comparatively low ranking on the silly and overpowered scale.

[@Zapranoth-lf8nt]

Eh…it’s a carrier…so who cares? Sell it for the silver and get on with important things. Great review, as always, sir! Your wit works wonders. 😂

[@thosedangfreakalopes2589]

@@Zapranoth-lf8nt skill issue

[@christofferahnstedt593]

@@thosedangfreakalopes2589 Haha, you REALLY want to go with that old and worn slur after the review?😄

[@tacticangel]

@@thosedangfreakalopes2589 - there's a large portion of the community that doesn't want to have anything to do with carriers, and it has nothing to do with whether or not they could play them well. Heck, half the time I play them, it's because I'm tired of the boat game, but still want to finish out a mission. 😄

[@tacticangel]

Thanks, as always, Zap! 😎You know they say neer sell your premiums, but it does hurt to think of someone holding that button on Enterprise, even if she is just pixels here.

[@Zapranoth-lf8nt]

@@tacticangelMy son has always loved Big E, ever since the Battle 360 shows years ago. He’s still trying to talk me out of it, but I find CVs boring, so I’ll never play it…. I mean, she SHOULD be a museum somewhere, but…alas…

[@jimmcclure7149]

Your disappointment is palpable throughout. Big E deserved better. You’re right, they don’t need to make it good to get people to buy it.

[@tacticangel]

Glad you agree. Sometimes a bit of indignation helps the review, but I'm not sure if I struck the right balance.

[@sr-5568]

The most decorated and revered ship of ww2.And they scrapped her sacrilege of an American hero.

[@moedark4390]

Enterprise should be the best carrier in the game but they would rather make fake russian carriers great

[@jadensmit9127]

I agree,just like war thunder lol

[@tacticangel]

I mean I'd just like her to be pretty competitive. 😎 But she'll get there... maybe... someday...

[@jarrodprieto5841]

Enterprise has a new lease of life, not just in WoWs, but Azur Lane, too.

[@virasad]

i've put all my resources to make Picard at 16/3 run the enterprise. now im feel regret what i've done. i can made better damang on T5 Langley more than this T7

[@tacticangel]

Ouch... yeah, that's doubly disappointing.