You Can Buy This Personal Flying Vehicle Now - Jetson One | How Much Does It Cost? eVTOL | Review

[@londo776]

92,000 USD, with maybe 20mins flying time i dont think so when i can buy a Piper J-5 Cruiser for 27,000 USD and will keep me warm and dry or a new Eagle Helicycle helicoper for 38,000 USD new

[@Mr.Thermistor7228]

Yes sir

[@Mr.Thermistor7228]

@@sysublime5091 what in the actual fuck are you talking about?! Are you seriously inferring that my yes sir is a stab at non-female pilots?! If you are serious and you are not trolling this is exactly why people hate your feminist bullshit ideals. That's is so weak if you really are serious.

[@rangerfontana591]

Apples to oranges. Oh... well done.

[@awebuser5914]

All those "other" aircraft require a pilot's license and many certifications. That's completely incomparable to this ridiculous toy, which essentially is designed to skirt-around any legal requirements and probably kill the idiot at the controls... (I seriously doubt that any of the kit builders will go the the lengths of having a proper ultralight inspection and certification done...)

[@awebuser5914]

@@sysublime5091 If you need a Sport Pilot rating, the market is pretty much non-existent. All of these "personal" multicopter companies are trying to get in the "no license required" Part 103 Ultralight category, that's the ENTIRE premise of all of them (BlackFly, etc)! If you require a rating, your market shrinks by a few orders of magnitude to the point of essentially non-existence.

[@myohmy111]

It looks very cool, and I would buy one, for maybe $25,000 - $30,000. Whom ever came up with a $92,000.00 price point, was obviously on an acid trip at the time!

[@FGain]

Thanks for the laugh! 🤣 Welcome to the channel, Jed!

[@rickrolled2691]

I’d pay $40k tops

[@FGain]

That's reasonable, Rick. Once supply of eVTOLs increase, prices will go down.

[@spendingtimetogether8428]

@@FGain Yup, that's just common sense, look at various stuff like computers and flatscreen TVs. Prices WILL go down eventually.

[@69mag]

92G is a drop in the bucket for a lot of people. Supply and demand, if they were any cheaper everyone could afford one, and right now these toys aren't for everyone.

[@Niggalodeon323]

Smh. Lost me at “20 min battery life” 🤦🏽‍♂️

[@Design_no]

And nearly 100k cost.

[@museonfilm8919]

May make a good theme park attraction though - 20 mins for $100...............they'll be right on the money!

[@Rnicky01]

Yep that battery life needs improvement.... Have they ever herd of solar-power? And hybrid engines? Im sure there is a weight limitation but with the correct materials it is possible...

[@mygreatlord]

​@@Rnicky01 no, you just stupid. solar panels 1000 times less powerful that venicle engines and hybrid 10 timess much weight

[@paulglancy3867]

I'll take yours then.

[@wheelmanjosh1982]

I wish it was a hybrid fuel aircraft that way you could get at least an hour out of it in flight time. It would be nice to be able to push 100 mph also. Baby steps, baby steps, I guess Good luck to the manufacturer sales and subsequent iterations.

[@FGain]

Exactly. This is just the very beginning. As eVTOL tech matures, we'll start seeing some really cool aircraft. Thanks for watching, Josh!

[@DeKrampus]

Aluminum/air batteries would increase range and reduce weight. Someone just needs to figure out a way to cost effectively swap them or get them to recharge.

[@andrefecteau]

I wish I could flap my arms and fly...what a stupid post...you want 5G in the first Iphone? Geez it's no wonder most go nowhere in life, if you need it to be perfect you'll never have a product...you just get it out and then refine it

[@Veldtian1]

@@andrefecteau Please address the virtually intractable battery power density issue then, until you or someone else does that the criticism is valid and there is NO WAY around this, no refining away the power density/weight/expense/range problem.

[@andrefecteau]

@@Veldtian1 that's only your opinion...I'm sure Elon and others are fathoms ahead of you, not to mention you read everyday about emerging technologies...so take your limited brain and stuff it up your butt I'm sure it will fit without any density issues

[@tnmonty501]

If I had enough money, heck yeah ! I’m sure in time a light enough power plant or longer lasting batteries will have these filling the skies

[@73challenger86]

If we all had one of these it would be raining crashed Jetson 1's. Seen the modern drivers of today?

[@john1105]

yea man can't wait for them to fit a power plant inside of it, sounds really economical and totally feasible! 🙄

[@ICP1SBJ]

put some solar panels on it and that 20 mins could be 40 mins or as long as the sun is out

[@tnmonty501]

@@john1105 like I said " in time" JA

[@craigcollyer8026]

Here they are!!!EXCITING

[@mrsqueakthecat.8061]

FINALLY! Something that will give the leafblowers real competition for noise!

[@FGain]

Thanks for the laugh! 😂🤣 eVTOLs are actually not that loud because they are all electric. Here is a video showing the noise level of a couple larger eVTOLs kzbin.info/www/bejne/aaPTq5qtediXhas Welcome to the channel!

[@mrsqueakthecat.8061]

​@@FGain You're pretty funny yourself, given how what you referenced has nothing to do with the unit shown in this video nor compares it to a leaf blower either. 😁 #FALSEEQUVILANCYFAIL 🤣🤣🤣 And yes, I totally agree, A HO scale model toy is nowhere near as powerful as a diesel-electric locomotive, despite both having wheels that are round. 😋

[@john1105]

yea because there are so many leaf blowers in the middle of nowhere, where you would be flying these things. Another offense unto mankind's evolution via KZbin comments section. How about "give ambulances competition for noise!" or "fog horns" or "anything that makes loud noises." Something can't give competition to another if they don't even play in the same sandbox, so the comparison is moot. Furthermore, since when were leaf-blowers relevant in 2021? Be more relatable.

[@mrsqueakthecat.8061]

@@john1105 LOL!!! So..... You cant imagine that these could ever come to the suburbs and like areas where leaf blowers are used? 🤣🤣

[@speedwayjesus2660]

@@john1105 Leaf blower use is at an all time high

[@cremi77]

The only video yet that includes the sound of the jetson! Thanks!

[@FGain]

You're welcome! Thanks for watching and welcome to the channel!

[@MissionTrivial]

I expect to see this one in the next Bond film... in a chase through an exotic city of course.

[@FGain]

That would be dope

[@john1105]

what's the top speed of these again?

[@michaelsherby6896]

that would be good give more research money then then it would be closer for US😉

[@jimvandemoter6961]

Here's a little perspective. December 17, 1903, Wright Brothers, Kittyhawk, the Wright Flyer. Here we are now, November 26 2021. Look how far we've come in 118 years. This technology is in it's infancy. Just think where we could be in another 100 years. We may not see it, but our children or grandchildren will.

[@bobthompson4918]

Imagine the carnage !😳 Have you seen what idiots do now while they are on four wheels ? This opens up a whole new level of possibilities....😬

[@mikaela543]

If I could afford it, I would have one, looks fun.

[@FGain]

Thanks for watching and commenting, Robert!

[@punkypinko2965]

But ... but ... the company's slogan is "Everyone is a pilot". I guess they didn't really mean "everyone".

[@eventfulnonsense]

In order for this flying contraption to be feasible, it needed the ff. 1. Graphene based batteries - light weight - can hold more juice - but still under development. 2. Super Capacitors - potential fast charging power source - still under development.

[@billmorris2613]

I really like the looks and the concept of the Jetton One. But there are too many limitations especially the 20 minute max flight time. Even though I think it could be flown as any other experimental or ultralight aircraft in the US and not restricted to private property. For the price of $92,000 a good used airplane like a Cessna 150, 152, or a 172, or a Piper Cherokee 140, 160, 161, 180, 181, could be bought for a lot less $$$.

[@ToddBryantsr]

To be honest, this design looks like exactly the type of thing the Chinese will duplicate and make much cheaper. It's a aluminum & carbon fiber frame, lithium ion batteries, a few brushless motors, a ESC and some lidar sensors. I could probably build one for about $7,000 - $10,000.

[@manofsan]

I think this kind of design should be Open Sourced. Then other tinkerers can replicate and improve on it gradually. Open Source would of course bring the cost down, making it more accessible.

[@VBL-]

@@manofsan There needs to be a business behind it, with visionary leaders at the helm, and not Github users

[@challengersrt5397]

Please do so and I’ll buy one😂

[@geoffsaunders5030]

A friend of mine once said 'there are the talkers and the finishers' so get started! No one I stopping you.

[@anivarhain]

I hope so and total price maby 20.000$ then this company can close.

[@михаилсмирнов-м1т]

Красиво. Для безопасности и устойчивости машины предлагаю добавить защитные углепластиковые кольца или трубы вокруг пропеллеров (а может и вообще закрыть торцы труб крупноячеистыми металлическими сетками, но это нужно пробовать). Такие летяги пригодятся для любых служб спасения. Т.к. в отличии от дронов они могут доставить главное: опытного специалиста с инструментами. Или при дистанционном управлении устройством, эвакуировать человека из труднодоступного места, даже если эвакуированный неумеет управлять подобным устройством. Подобные изделия очень нужны, желаю всем инженерам удачной работы в этом направлении.

[@FGain]

Спасибо Михаил за просмотр и комментарии!

[@михаилсмирнов-м1т]

Могу сделать ещё немного конструктивных предложений авторам данного проекта. Предлагаю сделать радиоуправляемый дрон на основе данной конструкции, который будет использоваться только для спасения и эвакуации одного человека. Наличие пилота в плоскости вращения пропеллеров будет рискованной затеей если отсутствует защита лопастей. По этому можно перенести точку подвеса пассажира в область ниже лопастей. Для быстрого понимания конструктивных особенностей такого изделия опишу его на виртуальном примере: Представьте ситуацию, при которой несколько человек оказались на льдине, или далеко заплыли, или оказались отрезаны от спасателей стеной пожара или болотами, или находятся на крыше разрушающегося или горящего здания, или находятся в расщелине гор, посреди селевого потока, и т.п. Т.е. люди нуждаются в быстрой эвакуации, но при этом находятся в местах недоступных для спасателей. Приезжает машина спасателей, из неё выгружают складной дрон, подготавливают его, вкладывают в него батареи. Дрон пилотируется дистанционно специально-обученным спасателем. Пилот ориентируется по камерам установленным на дроне, которые обеспечивают обзор для пилотирования, и обзор области находящейся под дроном. Дрон прилетает на место, зависает над человеком которого планируется эвакуировать, и сбрасывает канат прикреплённый к дрону, (таких канатов в дроне 3 или 4, на разные случаи. Каждый из них должен иметь возможность дистанционно отсоединяться от дрона, в случае случайного зацепления за ненужное препятствие или когда на канат в панике вешаются несколько людей что угрожает дрону). Так же, дрон может сбрасывать и рацию для связи, и поисковой маячок для удобства поиска спасателями. По рации (или громкоговорителю установленному на дроне) дают инструкции эвакуируемому, человек их выполняет, крепится к канату, и дрон переносит эвакуируемого к спасателям. (Таким образом можно эвакуировать по одному человеку за один заход, с крыш, из воды, со льдин, с болот, из непроходимого леса, и т.п. А так же производить поиск с помощью дрона с применением тепловизоров). Когда дрон привозит человека к спасателям, то, пока занимаются человеком, в дроне заменяют батареи, - таким образом, если у спасателей будет несколько комплектов батарей, то дрон можно эксплуатировать круглосуточно (с заряжением отсоединённых батарей, и с передышками для узлов дрона). Данная лётная конструкция очень хорошо подходит для изготовления двух типов дистанционно-управляемых дронов: 1. Складного дрона для эвакуации, (что очень важно для транспортировки дрона), и 2. Дрона для доставки специалиста с инструментами в нужное место, (имеющаяся на видео модель). Дистанционное управление показано в применении прототипа данного изделия. Создатели данного изделия поймут мои предложения и без чертежей. Организаторский момент: если создатели изделия сделают эвакуирующий дрон для служб спасения, снимут рекламный видеоролик о всех его возможностях, и будут продавать его по небольшой доступной цене, то они автоматически станут первыми на кого будут смотреть покупатели, а малая и доступная стоимость обеспечит стабильный серийный сбыт, что в сумме дадут возможность постоянной стабильной торговли такими дистанционно-управляемыми дронами, и стабильный доход для развития данного направления техники, (чтобы торговать дронами для служб спасения, и одновременно развивать другие направления модернизации этого изделия). Удачной работы!

[@FGain]

@@михаилсмирнов-м1т Многие компании разрабатывают такие дроны. Например, EHang производит автономный дрон на 2 места. Эти дроны не очень компактны, но их все же можно перевозить на небольших грузовиках. kzbin.info/www/bejne/fZW9g2OYd6lgra8

[@михаилсмирнов-м1т]

Посмотрел предложенное видео. E-Hang штука крутая. В основном для полётов "первым классом". Дорогая, а значит про стабильные продажи и массовое тиражирование можно забыть. Для служб спасения можно сделать что-нибудь попроще, без крытой кабины, компактнее для перевозки, и гораздо-более функциональнее чем E-Hang. Производители подобных изделий почему-то стремятся выйти на рынок "транспортных средств первого класса" дорогого сегмента (клиенты этого сегмента рынка в основном выбирают для себя что-нибудь понадёжнее для перевозок: яхты, вертолёты, самолеты, и т.п.), и при этом, так как производители стараются выйти на дорогой сегмент рынка, они в спешке забывают про гораздо-более массовый рынок который организуется спросом различных служб спасения и экологических служб, которым тоже нужны инструменты для работы. Службы спасения ценят компактность, т.е. - чем компактнее и много-функциональнее, - тем и лучше. Вообще, E-Hang как такси - хорошая идея, но для использования её в населённых пунктах, сначала нужно настроить слаженную работу навигации, позиционирования, с привязкой на погоду и на графики городского авиатранспорта и городских мероприятий, - и, следовательно, пока подобные системы необходимые для надёжной и слаженной работы автоматических пилотов транспортных систем имеются не во всех городах, то данный сегмент рынка ограничен. Ведь предоставлять вместе с летающими такси, ещё и специальный центр с дистанционными пилотами, - это нерентабельно. А службы спасения немогут полагаться на отдалённые центры пилотирования, т.к. службы спасения и экологи работают в отдалённых областях, и в условиях в которых требуется максимальное лётное адаптирование к ситуации и условиям работы. По всей видимости, большую часть стоимости летного такси составляет сервис дистанционного пилотирования. Высокая стоимость всего комплекта лётного такси вместе с центром пилотирования (если нет автопилотов), играет против развития тиражного производства этих такси, т.к. большая стоимость играет роль "пробки" в звеньях производства-торговли-обслуживания, и при такой стоимости такое такси становится нерентабельно (т.е. получается что "цена душит промышленное направление"). Но направление нужно развивать, т.к. оно даёт много полезных изделий для применения в гражданской жизни, и тут придёт на помощь производство недорогих специализированных модификаций, для массового серийного производства, что обеспечит стабильный доход для развития направления. Приведу в пример виртуальное сравнение, сравнивающие два сегмента спроса по данному изделию и его модификациям: что больше принесёт прибыли в год: 15 штук E-Hang по цене 300 000 дол (4 500 000 за год торговли, при чём рынок быстро насыщается и спрос падает), или 200 штук эвакуирующих дронов на базе Jetson-One по цене 30 000 дол (6 000 000 за год, при этом рынок только увеличивает спрос)? Производители зачастую стремятся развивать дорогие модификации изделий, и это хорошо. Но при этом всегда нужно помнить про рынок недорогого сегмента, который отличается огромными объёмами стабильного спроса. Для быстрого развития производств подобных изделий, производители могли бы осваивать два рынка одновременно. Спасибо за видео.

[@josevelazquez5310]

I think they should put a gas engine on it to make it more efficient ,and have the electric motors too in case you run out of gas ,this will help to increase the range of the vehicle too.

[@FGain]

This will certainly help with the range, but would negatively impact the sound profile. Also, the idea with eVTOLs is to have them run on clean energy. Thanks for watching, Jose!

[@Veldtian1]

@@FGain Yep, we're going to all have to get used to an unproven ideological stance governing even our transport efficiencies, I guess by 2035 when they plan to have no petrol cars on the road we're all just never going to be able to go on outback country 4WD trips either right? We'll all have to just stay within a 200km radius of our compact high density micro apartments being drenched in 5G - actually 48G electro smog and tucking into our soy/bug burgers and carefully regulating our social media posts to maintain our social credit scores too right? The future sounds awesome.

[@oceanhome2023]

@@Veldtian1 BUZZ KILL !!!

[@FGain]

😁

[@thezenturna1809]

You can not use gas engine in these vehicles because gas engine are way more heavier ,bigger and complex than electric motors as a result these vehicle cannot have such a small form factor and would become as big as a helicopter and that would completely ruined the only advantage this vehicle has in front of helicopters.

[@moisesherreraa]

This is the future. Clean, quiet, personal and easy way to fly.

[@n0spam911]

not quiet, trust me

[@gringote1783]

@@n0spam911 put the mit toroidal props on

[@phyl1283]

If I had one, I'd want the props shrouded to prevent a crash from prots hitting a vertical surface (wall, pole, etc.).

[@larryo6874]

And people…

[@markstanich64]

Ballistic parachute outstanding add on safety device . 50 STARS on this product would buy

[@hector-lee-taylor]

Max pilot weight 210-lbs. Well, that leaves out Americans.

[@FGain]

Shots fired

[@john1105]

the America is fat thing was so 10 years ago. A bit tired that joke. Back to the drawing board!

[@taliverdeltd7304]

Calling it a TOY is a good description.

[@FGain]

🙂

[@thtiger1]

Wonder how long before it turns up in a movie? It looks like it would be perfect for a Bond Movie, but I'm sure it will show up in some other action movie long before the next Bond movie.

[@punkypinko2965]

I wonder how long before it turns up killing someone on the set of a movie? This thing is not safe. It's insane to market this to "everyone."

[@scottwayne9148]

I drawl some sketch I seen the one that the seat kind of standing tilted back and has a parachute and gas operated and the snow sled with a cab the plastic frame looks similar to the Jetson One. great invention to high for my self I'm low income

[@A_Prius]

If I could afford one I would buy it without hesitation When I was in school I imagined walking out and flying home in my personal aircraft

[@FGain]

I do too imagine flying any time I have a long commute. Personal eVTOLs can save so much time. Thanks for watching and commenting!

[@69mag]

When I was a kid (I'm 61) I daydreamed about riding 4 wheeled motorcycles as I rode my horse across our ranch. It eventually happened..

[@FGain]

Tim, for us city boys, the idea of riding a horse is almost as exciting as flying an eVTOL 😁

[@jina8397]

I have always wished for one of this flying car when I am caught in traffic jams & congested roads. I hope this is the beginning for mankind to beat traffic jam.

[@punkypinko2965]

So you want thousands of everyday people flying over your head and crashing into buildings as they occasionally have "flying car" trouble and maybe fly into a school or hospital? I don't believe you've thought this through.

[@RandomPerson-vf3ld]

Hell yea I want one. Hopefully price will half in the next 5 years and aluminum air batteries will make it have a much longer flight time.

[@mikestiehl3385]

This is just awesome. 20 min would be a long white knuckle ride for me.

[@rikkety]

It would ideal for fence patrol/repairs, in the outback farming communities of Australia. Unfortunately, the range would need to be tripled, at least

[@efisgpr]

It will be in just a few years. Battery energy density is increasing very fast.

[@djg585]

Maybe if the pilot isn't too heavy, it can carry a small generator and fuel.

[@bobthompson4918]

You're gonna need to be triple vaxxed also.....

[@sysublime5091]

You could carry a small generator for that. Or just buy a real helicopter like a Robertson. Or Cb 300.

[@sysublime5091]

@@efisgpr apparently the Chinese have come up with a battery that will last decades.. that then would be feasible.

[@GoodMan-fq2rf]

I like this vehicle but it needs propeller guard safety. I can help to make it better because I am a technology Upgrading specialist. I also suggest that Jetson one looking to the new batteries being developed by Tesla.

[@punkypinko2965]

Yeah it would be a problem when you chop off everyone's head just before you crash and kill yourself. This thing is a danger to anyone flying it and everyone around. This thing is insane. Cool? Yeah. Insane? Oh yeah. I don't think a propeller guard safety is going to do much to really make it safe. Sorry I fly into you with my quadcopter ... but I'm sure you're fine because it has a propeller guard safety :) Or maybe you meant to keep your own hands from getting chopped off? Yeah, the problems list with this one is long.

[@GoodMan-fq2rf]

@@punkypinko2965 #The reason why I mention propeller guards because here in the USA the FAA will probably require propeller guards on such vehicles. I know Jetson one and Elon Musk probably will not never give me a chance to show them how talented I can be in the drone industry but I hope one day somebody will give me a chance to show how do you talented I can be.

[@johnk.849]

Be interesting to see which countries would allow the use of this 'Flying Guillotine'. Can't imagine too many .

[@gladek800]

Constructor this vehicle is from Poland. Me too :). Greeting from Poland. He is driving by the way. This place is called Pustynia Błędowska and its only desert place in Europe. Love and peace for everyone. And remember. We save your boarder.

[@nicksofialakis1448]

Its a very beautiful and simplified machine which is exactly what the greenies my allowing us to fly in the future. The huge downdraft for such an aircraft will be the government's taxing licensing mandatory-insurances registrations landing charges, fines etc. Otherwise it's a lovely low maintenance concept that will get even better if governments will keep their ravenous taxing teeth to themselves...

[@FGain]

Yes governments always ruin everything. Thanks for watching, Nick. Welcome to he channel!

[@raymondgoubet]

@@FGain governments: they lie, tax, ban, and make a few things compulsory.

[@FGain]

I cannot disagree with you on that.

[@stormystrikes]

The United States government, especially the liberals who run on the low emissions and save our planet, will be the first to swoop in and tax the heck out of all green energy advancements. Be prepared to pay more in insurance, "fly" license, and landing fees to recharge the Jetson will exceed current fuel costs at the pump. It's sad.

[@firecatgreg]

I hate to disagree with you but it's rather easy to do that with this comment about it being "green". How exactly is this green? Well it's a one person aircraft and a ultralight like aircraft so in the USA it means it costs less to own. But it has a range of about 15 to 20 minutes. Early on some promo stuff said 15 minutes for a 182 pound guy and speeds up to 63 miles an hour. This means a range of 15 miles. So let's see how green it is. It has an 88 KW Kilowatt battery. Let's assume that the battery is charged with 100 percent efficiency which is not going to be the case, but let's give it the benefit of that doubt. The average house in the United states does use a lot of energy. In most states the average kilowatt usages is between 800 KW per month and 1000 KW per month. That's for electricity which may include all the appliances and at times for some cooking or even heating, but it depends so it averages out to easily over 880 KW hours a month. This means for ONE FLIGHT for 15 minutes and 15 miles at max speed, you are going to need 3 days worth of electricity from you're normal use. How is that green? By the way in our neighborhood in Detroit we have DTE energy and their default energy model is electricity comes from Fermi or some nuclear plant, which ironically is more green that some sources of fuel, depending on how you look at it. And coal for base electricty with PEAKERS often being natural gas turbines which burn natural gas in a gas turbine engine in buildings. So we are burning coal to power our grid mostly and that coal will be sending electricity and with ten rides within 15 miles for their entire ride you will be doubling you average home electricity bill. If the energy comes from Coal, well it may be cheaper, but if the Biden Green Agenda 21 goals happen there won't be any energy from coal, oil, natural gas, etc. So we will have 5% of our energy and wealth with the Agenda 21 plan. Electric isn't green and horsepower is needed to move large items which offer comfort and protection. Each new component of technology even special stuff costs in embedded energy to make it. So this is green compared to some aircraft I supposed, but it's not really green for the average person in the USA and we are energy wasters. But it's "electric" and to the Biden lovers and fantasy folks electric equals green. Electricity can produce fairly easily 80 percent efficiencies from energy with electric motors so they have their place. If you lower the needs of the person and strip them of safety and comforts and give them a much smaller vehicle you can have a more efficient vehicle. Also in urban areas near you're home you won't be able to fly this in the USA, so you have to cart it out to the country to fly it over country side. That's not green it requires a truck and a trailer. Now to compare that with efficient rides that are more green there is bicycles or ebikes which can be using 1 cent a mile to transport you. It's a lot less energy required and for flat land 350 watts max will get you up to 18 miles an hour for most ebikes and get you a long way. If you pedal you're calorie power will provide even further efficiency but on average it's a penny a mile. Not 3 days worth of electricity or 88 KW for 15 miles. An 88kw battery charge would charge my ebike more than 90 days as it has a battery pack of about 700 watts and I can get about 40 miles riding quite fast on average on a charge of 700 watts. So I can ride my ebike 3600 miles with 88 kilowatts of power. That is way more green than this flying drone that can get you 15 miles on the same energy. It's more exciting of course and a cool thing. A play toy for the rich or those who have the money to spare. Pretty affordable actually but having a drone that kicks up a lot of dust won't make you a big star at most parties. People won't want you to show up and kick up the dust. Just my 2 cents which will take me two miles on an ebike.

[@museonfilm8919]

This looks great fun - and hat's off to these guys for their hard work. BUT. Governments aren't going to let folks fly around busy towns or cities any time soon - so that's the end of impressing her, by turning up with this, on your first date!

[@FGain]

Why did you have to ruin this fantasy for me? 🙃

[@capefear3297]

Amazing machine. The prototype is more appealing than the finished product. Maybe I could afford it with five partners to split the bill.

[@WillieStubbs]

This would make a nice timeshare venture or as a rental vehicle. Fly and land at sheds where spare batteries are being recharged by solar in remote locations, do a battery swap and keep going so you can tour beautiful locations.

[@kewlztertc5386]

It doesn't need to be operated only on "private" property. It can be operated in any uncontrolled airspace that's uninhabited or sparsely inhabited. Rural, deserts, or farmland is ideal.

[@NMIBUBBLE]

92,000 for 20 minutes, nope. Awesome design tho. It should have an 12 hour run time and be able to hook up to a Tesla charger, there’s a free bee on what to do with it next! I think if you sold it for 20 grand you’d be as big as any other car company on the planet. When that happens I’ll open up a shop to service them. I have some great ideas on what it would look like.

[@kennethhoppe2259]

@ NMIBUBBLE sounds like a great Idea. Wish that I had some money. I'd like to get a break in life and someone with alot of money would overlook all the Shit Talk about me help he out with a few of my Ideas and endeavors.

[@moonday4868]

If you own a huge private property or ranch of a few square miles this will very useful for keeping an eye on it, very efficiently, in a way you cannot on foot, horseback, or wheeled ATV.

[@speedwayjesus2660]

What about a simple DJI drone in that case? More flight time, zero risk, and 90k cheaper.

[@vlogcity1111]

@@speedwayjesus2660 true they also have paramotors that can fly low and slow

[@williamcrane9248]

Nicely put together but $100k for a basic chassis? Great but massively overpriced for a general consumer market. I wonder what Honda would do with this concept (or, of course, the Chinese?) Tremendous potential however as a concept vehicle.

[@FGain]

Honda has announced plans for a VTOL aircraft. I made a video about it kzbin.info/www/bejne/mXbCo6Smj8p1ndE . Thanks for commenting, William! Welcome to the channel!

[@Optikification]

When will DJI get in the market.

[@69mag]

Good call! The motorcycle companies have been making some very powerful engines in a compact form for years, you'd think they could engineer a pretty robust flying machine.

[@firecatgreg]

I actually don't agree with this being green or electric being a great idea for VTOLS . . . but considering the technical hurdles they are trying to overcome, I consider this actually to be very cheap. This is almost like a hobby gone wrong for the founders. I can't imagine them making much of a living or profit off these for the price they are charging. With the safety features and all the redundant components they need this is actually quite cheap.

[@josephluton1061]

Most certainly, I literally dream of flying, yes in my dreams. I will buy one. Moving cattle, would be great to use in Africa.

[@FGain]

Oh yes, I bet these would be very useful on a farm. Thanks for watching Joseph! Welcome to the channel!

[@john1105]

I might set my goals a little lower.

[@69mag]

Flying dreams are the best! I've only had a few but I remember them vividly.

[@LEO_CXLIV]

At that price I could build a fleet of my own but with much better and possibly indefinite sustained flight capabilities.

[@efisgpr]

I'll give you the $92K for ONE of your fleet..... don't forget the indefinite range, plzkthanx

[@clninjarider17]

I believe when battery tech gets improved with at least one hour plus flight time. this vehicle will have more useful applications. Overall it is a great concept that will get more visions! Very cool!!

[@FGain]

Thanks for watching, Christopher.

[@spendingtimetogether8428]

It's a tossup between the Airspeeder and this one for me. Both amazing and beautifully-designed machines. Wonder what laws they will have for flying these?

[@rty1955]

The FAA is working on it I bet. I dont want some idiot flying these over my house. If it flys, it needs to be licensed, and licensed mechanics keeping them correctly operating. I also wonder about what insurance they will need to be operated as well.

[@artbobik3516]

@@rty1955 I think it comes under LSA Rules that are already in place -

[@artbobik3516]

on second thought it is more like Ultralight / Para Glider rules

[@rty1955]

@@artbobik3516 yeah and see how well that works! People flying w/o oxygen, flying in the clouds etc. As more people buy these things, I can bet the FAA will crack down. All it will take is 1 accident with an airliner, or accident where loss of life, or major property damage is concerned. W/o a license to lose, it will be a free for all up there.

[@vajraayudha5062]

I'm going to takeoff with this at the end of the road and when it reaches 88 miles / hr. Flux capacitor kicks in and I"m on the other side of the world in no time. Coffee in NY, lunch in Barcelona, Tea in Shanghai and candle lit dinner next to Kamo river in Hokkaido and back to NY by sun rise . Repeat the same over every weekend...

[@FGain]

Sounds like a plan 😁

[@billstrebin4601]

Ditch the batteries and get a Mr. Fusion. Plenty of range and you can get the 1.21 Gigawatts needed to get the flux capacitor and time circuits to engage.

[@nowy5]

Startup: We built fully electric ecologic aircraft. Everybody: We want it with diesel.

[@FGain]

You summed up the comments section perfectly 😁

[@K162KingPin]

If these were mass produced like cars the cost could drop significantly. They only have about $5000 in parts in them, add another $5000 for assembly since at the moment it is done completely manually and total production cost is only $10,000. The other $82,000 is just markup because it is new and rare. In a few years either this company will start mass production or another company will, possibly multiple companies and the price will drop to around $20,000 for a base model. It wouldn't surprise me at all to see things like this in 15 years used like uber but fully automated, put int address coming from and to, and hop it to be taken where you want to go.

[@FGain]

Could not agree more. Thanks for watching and welcome tot he channel!

[@tocarules]

Love it, but I've crashed my Mavic twice already.

[@FGain]

It's not safe to have you behind a joystick and/or a throttle lever, so it seems 😁. Thanks for commenting!

[@kazimierzspaczynski7401]

Yes I love it. I wish it could fligh 1 hour.

[@FGain]

You and me both, Kazimierz. Thanks for watching. Welcome to the channel.

[@manwithanamethystheart]

Its like a flying go-kart lol

[@FGain]

Now there is a business idea. Start an eVTOL based park where people can fly these electric aircraft. Insurance might be a pain tho.

[@manwithanamethystheart]

@@FGain would have to be 18+ and signed consent form.

[@mgrecord9814]

I subscribed to your channel just because you said goodbye in Portuguese - you call my attention 4:36

[@robtroman7917]

On my budget the only time I get to fly low is when the zipper on my trousers opens without me knowing about it.

[@FGain]

Thanks for the laugh, Rob! 🤣🤣

[@stevelee4653]

its amazing.. I mean wow, never seen anything like this.. its totally cool. I would love to have one someday!!!

[@asmbeers]

$92,000 and you have to put it together yourself. I paid less than that for my Craftsman house.

[@FGain]

To be fair Bob, those who can afford a $92k toy can probably afford hiring someone to assemble the aircraft for them. Thanks for watching!

[@KP-je6jt]

Like led tv's, just wait three more years. 😂🤣

[@vvhosyourdaddy]

I'll assemble it for ya Bob. Labor is $50 plus $5,000 to read the instructions and figure out the assembly process. Also, I'll have to ummm......test fly it. You know, for your safety.

[@SpartanHeaven]

ill wait for the silent model thanks

[@daveballman1425]

Like it a lot. Would love to see two seater come out...yes, I'd buy it.

[@john1105]

no you're talking!

[@nicksofialakis1448]

I'll love a two seater to get my dog with me.

[@orlandojohnson5742]

Probably have to keep your weight down with 2 people flying! It would have to be stronger motors or something!?

[@bluefalconssuck5881]

Simply put. This is amazing with great potential for future breakthroughs in time and distance endurance. Unfortunately, Government will step in and screw it all up... because that is what it does.

[@FGain]

Unfortunately, this has proved to be the case in the past. The current example is governments' unfavourable regulation of cryptocurrency. Thanks for watching and commenting!

[@bluefalconssuck5881]

@@FGain Have you looked into how much weight you could reduce using Carbon fiber construction, then using that weight allowance to add more batteries to extend the range? Or is this negligible? I know there's a cost increase in doing this, yet there is more of a chance in cost reduction over time when compared to aluminum construction.

[@FGain]

@@bluefalconssuck5881 I'm guessing it would be insignificant performance increase at a significant cost increase. The better approach that I can think of for range extension would be a winged design. Lift would be provided by wings and rotors would provide thrust. Check out my video titled 'Which eVTOL is Better' or 'eVTOL comparison' (I change the title from time to time) in which I talk about the pros and cons of various eVTOL designs.

[@doughowdy7009]

@@FGain The FAA is very stringent with regards with aircraft flight safety. It is unlikely any eVTOL will receive a Certificate of Airworthiness, as there are to many risks involved. Battery powered aircraft are too dangerous, as Lithium-ion batteries have been known to explode and catching fire due to thermal runaway

[@FGain]

@@doughowdy7009 I disagree with your second point. Joby has recently completed test flights with NASA. One of the goals of the tests was to identify gaps in current FAA regulation policies to help incorporate advanced air mobility aircraft into the National Airspace System. I have a video on these tests on my channel.

[@youbian]

Jetson: Now available for order. FAA: no

[@FGain]

😁 FAA the party pooper

[@w9x7cv3vg6]

it should be legal for responsible owners to lift off from inside cities and manouver to where u wanna go…i would want one out in the country to get to local villages etc..for short errands..this is well worth it as technology will get smarter as it proves itself..

[@darthzoidberg7850]

These personal flying machines are really really cool as a toy but I tend to agree with what Elon Musk said, they are far too noisy to be used as daily transport! Fire one of these up at 6 am in a residential area and every Karen within a mile radius will lose her mind! Besides most people barely have the ability to drive their sad little hatchback do we really want those people "flying" aircraft? I see two requirements before these things can be widely used by Joe Public first they would have to be fully autonomous to remove the "Joe Public" factor, and second they would need to be a lot quieter!

[@FGain]

I see eVTOLs being used more as air taxi, than personal modes of transportation, at least in the beginning. Check out my videos as I cover many of such eVTOLs (Lilium, Joby, Hyundai, Vertical Aerospace, etc.) Thanks for commenting and welcome to the channel!

[@igibon8]

I only think about drunk flying in the future. Maybe there will be flying police trying to catch those drunk pilots

[@FGain]

@@igibon8 Police chases in the future are gonna be dope

[@ICP1SBJ]

@@FGain police chases in the future will be lame because in the future the police will be able to shut your car down via the internet. your car won't be able to go over 5 MPH over the speed limit in your area.. The future will suck

[@firecatgreg]

I think this points out to the fact that "smart cities" and other initiatives from Agenda 21 will be that more things are self driven in other words you are basically a passenger and these are controlled by GPS and the control of where they can fly and when they can fly has to be vetted with a flight plan. It's one thing to fly them when you want to but another thing to have them integrated into a smart city. But the "Smart City" plan is a big money plan for technology but it means you are connected to the grid and the overlords have more control and you are more venerable to hackers or software failure. Or the system that decides you are not politically correct and have to be locked out of the rental control system. Kind of like drones right now with the FAA. They have to "regulate airspace" and they have a goal to regulate all drones even hobby ones so the business drones and air taxi drones can fly around without crashing into you're toy drone or you're Jetson 1. The promise and hope is always to fly in an unregulated way like the good old days. But that's the hype. The reality is if you want a safe airspace, the regulations are required and more computerized control is needed. So it will take the "fun" out of the various power sports. Because people are impulsive and make mistakes. This has a high degree of a mistake being the death of the operator, but nobody want's 500 lbs of aircraft and passengers falling on their house or even car, much less a crowd. So these have very limited value but some dream of a 5th element like future. Unfortunately you can't argue with physics and the green types who love to quote this often have a basic misunderstanding of engineering, energy and common sense.

[@audioauracle-dsyswpwanl-]

Sweet 👀 All i see is *wipEout - anti gravity racing league* 🏁

[@jyeaman2012]

You think that they will ever extend the flight time? $92000 is a lot of money for 15-20 min of fun! If they ever get it up to 2hrs I could see these flying over heavy traffic on a interstate. Then I would consider forking out the dough!

[@FGain]

Yes, once energy density of batteries increases, flight time will increase. The development solid state batteries, which deliver higher energy density, is looking very promising. Thanks for watching! Welcome to the channel!

[@Benjamin-xv9le]

That thing is not going to fly for 20mins. It supposedly weighs 86kg. Let's say 66kg of that is battery. I think I'm being generous there. Energy density of batteries is about 0.166kwh/kg, so you get 11kwh. Engines are rated for 88kw. So at full power you get 7.5mins. You could probably hover 1m above the ground for 15mins at half power, but that's it.

[@Design_no]

@@FGain oh yes, in another decade 😆

[@qpwoeiruty108]

I hope it's just the beginning, and probably this type of vehicle will replace cars in the future

[@FGain]

It is certainly just the beginning. Not sure if eVTOLs replace cars, but will definitely be a big part of the way we commute. Many companies are developing eVTOLs. Check out my other videos as I covered many leading eVTOLs. Thanks for commenting and welcome to the channel!

[@sugarsugarplum1332]

I wonder what the range would be with a fuel cell or gasoline power source. Also, how much noise does it make?

[@FGain]

The noise is very low in comparison to other aircraft, given that it is fully electric. That is the benefit of eVTOLs. Here is a video that compares the noise level of two eVTOLs (larger than the Jetson One) to conventional aircraft (helicopters and airplanes). Thanks for watching and welcome to the channel!

[@sugarsugarplum1332]

@@FGain I'm not sure how to respond to a factual and thoughtful reply on YT. Thank you.

[@FGain]

@@sugarsugarplum1332 I forgot to attach the link to the video I mentioned. Here it is kzbin.info/www/bejne/aaPTq5qtediXhas

[@jaredmouret9723]

Far enough to reach your heart ❤

[@abdulsharif6541]

I like the potential of this aerial vehicle... I think it will improve by 2025....

[@HR-od9fl]

Technology is a wonderful thing ,so fantastic the Jetson 1 , imagine what it's going to be like in 10yrs from know , everyone buzzing about on these things ,if you have the wallet 😂

[@JoannaJedrzejczyksForehead]

They had a flying drone car back in the 90’s when I was a kid.

[@CunoWiederhold]

Yes! If I had the money, I'd buy one. If the range were a few hours, it would be awesome! One of these and an electric Unicycle would be all I'd need! lol

[@midgetman4206]

I think I'll save up for an autogryro instead. They're better in every way: available, cheaper, a community to help.

[@erdalevin5672]

Im from Germany and the company is basically next door. The CEO died lately in one of his gyrocopter.

[@TONYPARAMOTOR]

@@erdalevin5672 so does that mean the ceo had a accident ? while flying the gyrocopter? all aviation is dodgey. iam a paramotor pilot.

[@midgetman4206]

@@erdalevin5672 That will always be a danger, no matter what, even more so when flying.

[@thedevmachine]

Gonna build this myself.

[@FGain]

I would love to see the final product. Good luck, Oguz!

[@thedevmachine]

@@FGain 😀 8x 150cc Brushless Outrunner

[@elkcircle7245]

I’d want at least 6*2 rotors rather 4*2 before risking my life in this!

[@FGain]

Sounds like you do not like to live dangerously.

[@elkcircle7245]

@@FGain I fly single engine land and gliders, both have wings that can keep you up without an engine; never liked helicopters; I’d willingly fly Lilium/Joby etc once they have been certified, but not something like this which comes in near the bottom of the Experimental category, if it’s going to be licensed at all!

[@FGain]

@@elkcircle7245 Seems like you took my comment a bit too seriously 🙂

[@elkcircle7245]

@@FGain no, not at all, just pointing out the risks.🤓 but it’s also quite costly for something that’s basically unproven.

[@EinzigfreierName]

You'd still have the parachute rescue system in case of a system failure but I guess it's not very useful at low altitudes.

[@Emma_1226]

If they can mass produce it to lower the price this would be perfect for Las Vegas desert rentals. At its current pricing this is jot feasible because the initial investment will be to high to make any profit. At 20 min fly time it cannot be rented at a higher price.

[@FGain]

Can't wait to be able to rent one of these and fly across the Grand Canyon. Thanks for watching, Glenn!

[@mervwall6781]

Serious question! What method do you use to charge the batteries?

[@gunner678]

Why don't these designs come with a quick change power pack. The battery could be on a lease basis with a set recharge contract. The range then would be from station to station, where the battery would be quickly swapped for a fully charged one, and a safety check completed at the same time.

[@WillowandPup]

I love it i want one ..make it quieter. Like a whisper. ..

[@vvhosyourdaddy]

Given the unsafe nature of lipo batteries, I'd hate to be in the air when those combust. I'm assuming the boxes are mostly shielded, but the heat alone could put the pilot and vehicle at risk. I'm hoping there is a way to jettison that battery in an emergency, and rely on a smaller shielded backup pack that would give enough juice for an emergency landing.

[@FGain]

It certainly comes with risks however I think the risk of a battery catching on fire is fairly low, as long as it is well maintained. Thanks for watching and welcome to the channel!

[@doughowdy7009]

The FAA absolutely hates Lithium-ion batteries, that's why, and also many other reasons, these aircraft will never be approved for flight in the USA

[@adamw.8579]

@@FGain Consider LiFePO4 technology, same energy density but more stable. One downside is lower voltage for cell.

[@scottprather5645]

You worry too much

[@doughowdy7009]

@@scottprather5645 kzbin.info/www/bejne/Z4TTXq2gh9Jmh5o

[@kennethgeovanny8557]

Sign me in, I would definitely purchase one.

[@john1105]

Don't you mean, sign me "up"? How do you fuck that one up?

[@NonyaDamnbusiness]

They mention a parachute but do *not* mention the max ceiling so I'm kind of dubious.

[@FGain]

Fair question. A parachute is only effective above a certain altitude. Thanks for watching and welcome to the channel!

[@rickrolled2691]

They say it’s a rapid deploy chute, whatever that means

[@waltw918]

Pretty cool.. make a body design that looks like the aircraft on "Oblivion".

[@nyimbwasilumesii9214]

Exactly what I was thinking.

[@FGain]

Thant would be dope!

[@DesertRockfall]

Is there a reason that 90% of the footage of the Jetson zooming across the desert was shot directly into the rising sun? It was really frustrating trying to get a good look at it in flight. Is it the "style" now, or is something going on? I'm old, please enlighten me.

[@FGain]

Good question. Unfortunately I do not have a good explanation for it. I thought it was just a cinematography direction they have chosen, but perhaps there was an ulterior motive. Thanks for commenting, Will. Welcome to the channel!

[@rty1955]

Its the cretins who think its "artistic". This is what happen when you give film students a camera

[@chrisabraham8793]

I will wait for Jetson 5 to come about, when the battery time is longer and the cost comes down.

[@FGain]

Chris, I bet future Jetson models will be sick!

[@22grena]

The fact that the purchaser has to complete the assembly is extremely dodgy. If something goes wrong they can blame you. That plus the short flight time, weight problem and high cost make it a toy only for millionaires and suicide bombers at this time. But clearly it is the future.

[@kokogoreng4115]

anda benar

[@FGain]

Terima kasih kerana menonton!

[@kokogoreng4115]

@@FGain sama-sama..sukses terus pak!!!

[@pstuddy]

92k??? I'd buy THAT for a dollar! Nyaaahh

[@stuartlennox66]

Maybe when it can fly for more than 20 minutes and the cost goes down to about $20,000 I might think about it 🤣

[@elementary101Music]

Lmao I was thinking 5k

[@FGain]

There are so many startups working on personal eVTOLs that I have no doubt prices will go down in a not so distant future.

[@catmando4914]

Love it, want one. Unfortunately, that price tag does not work for me, simply can't afford it. I would love to have one for the deserts here in California. For $92,000 I can get the top of the line all electric F-150.

[@FGain]

Yes, but the all electric F-150 won't turn as many heads as the Jetson One ;) Thanks for commenting Gary. Welcome to the channel!

[@markonyoutube7278]

Looks like a flying lawn mower. lol. sort of like that gyrocopter in mad max. Also looks super dangerous for bystanders and probably the pilot too.

[@FGain]

Flying lawn mower. That was my first impression too. 😀 These exposed rotors do look dangerous. I wonder what approach regulators will take in regards to rotor enclosure.

[@nickl5658]

@@FGain The don't just look dangerous, they are dangerous both to people outside and the pilot. One broken blade and you have a piece of metal flying off at a few hundred kilometers an hour.

[@vvhosyourdaddy]

Reminds me of that hovercraft in the game UT2004. It was a twin prop vehicle you could use to decapitate players in the game.

[@FH-cn3mg]

There would definitely need to be some housings on those if they were every available to park in public, probably also rotor wash hazard warnings on the side and probably some mesh like material to keep people from sticking their hands inside the prop housing. (Don't look at me, people do dumb stuff...just sayin lol)

[@garyhill9516]

The expense is what I can't get behind. But the concept is wonderful.

[@edsilco2113]

Just for rich people. We need to wait years to see this toy cheaper.🙄😔

[@FGain]

A cheaper "alternative" would be a First-Person View drone. Will give you the same rush, with no risk of physical harm. 😁

[@edsilco2113]

@@FGain I agree. Too risky to fly a new manned toy.

[@paulglancy3867]

Remember Neil Armstrong? Flying something like this, test pilot, and just ejected with "seconds he didn't realy have, just luck" This reminds me.

[@FGain]

Electric Vertical Takeoff & Landing (eVTOL) Aircraft: 🚁Futuristic eVTOL Propulsion System kzbin.info/www/bejne/hnnCeWqmftB_ars 🚁 Lilium vs Joby Which Electric Jet Quieter? kzbin.info/www/bejne/aaPTq5qtediXhas 🚁 Ultimate eVTOL Comparison Part 1 kzbin.info/www/bejne/f5OsimScZZqCqLs 🚁 Lilium vs Joby vs Archer | Which kzbin.info/www/bejne/hYjbkHiXZ9hqq9U 🚁 Lilium Real Sound Profile - Noise Level kzbin.info/www/bejne/nWWlqJqses1-hpY 🚁 Vertical Aerospace vs Lilium, Joby & Archer. Which Is Better? kzbin.info/www/bejne/j6q8np-rrqdjpLc 🚁 Joby Aviation (JOBY) vs. Archer (ACHR) kzbin.info/www/bejne/a5yllpZ4aNFmoNE 🚁 Joby World's Longest eVTOL Flight kzbin.info/www/bejne/b2m0nqttYs58o7s 🚁 Cavorite X5 Most Unique Hybrid Electric VTOL kzbin.info/www/bejne/pqW4mpiDg7BoaMU 🚁 Hyundai eVTOL kzbin.info/www/bejne/nGbcqqund9uKgaM 🚁 Archer Aviation Unveil Event Highlights kzbin.info/www/bejne/b3jJamuOibimrJY 🚁 Honda eVTOL Aircraft kzbin.info/www/bejne/mXbCo6Smj8p1ndE 🚁 Beta Technologies Elegant Design kzbin.info/www/bejne/fYi2fZeOZ7imfc0 🚁 VoloCity Air Taxi by Volocopter kzbin.info/www/bejne/a528ZYWPnMedmNk 🚁SAMAD Aerospace S5U & Starling Jet | Hybrid-Electric VTOL kzbin.info/www/bejne/hnndmXeahsmslZY 🚁 Volocopter Autonomous Urban Air Taxi Test Flight kzbin.info/www/bejne/g4K3qZtqa5d0mZI 🚁 Vahana & CityAirbus Airbus’ eVTOL kzbin.info/www/bejne/gaKYmZ2fg9efrdk 🚁 Electric Flying Racing Car Airspeeder MK3 EXA Series kzbin.info/www/bejne/kH7Ve4KYl9dkrrM 🚁 VoloConnect Extended Urban Transport kzbin.info/www/bejne/aYS9ooyZd9iMkNU 🚁 Lilium Amazing Architecture & Engineering kzbin.info/www/bejne/oWS4k5qngpKmqLc 🚁 Lilium 7-Seater Cabin Unveil. Evolution of Lilium Jets kzbin.info/www/bejne/mmTIiqycjdOfacU

[@manofsan]

I'd like to see what failure mode looks like. They say it has ballistic parachute, but I think we need a video which demos this.

[@FGain]

We certainly do. Also, keep in mind that at a low altitude ballistic parachute is ineffective

[@manofsan]

​ @FGain - I think they should also include airbags, which could also add significant protection at lower altitudes. It should even have the option for a flotation device, in case of flying over water/swampland. I admit, I wish this barebones design could be Open Sourced, in order to make it more accessible and available at lower cost to designers and tinkerers to build and even improve.

[@aleisterlavey9716]

" You can buy..." No. No I can't. I would need money for that, but I can't even afford borrowing some money. 😆 🤣 😆

[@FGain]

@@aleisterlavey9716 :-)

[@luisboscan2995]

Excellent explanation, what was explained in the video was understood, keep it up, faithful follower of your channel. Thank you

[@FGain]

Thanks for following, Luis!

[@oakandthepack4887]

if i win the lotto...this will be my second purchase. the first being a massive property in the middle of no where

[@FrankLavoy]

Love the name #TheJetsons 😉

[@jonv1691]

it's like a early dune buggy. where we used a bed frame as roll bars. Protecting the Human

[@gvb7727]

yes!!! get it down to 30k!!!

[@shujmosham..8468]

If im allowed to use in nyc i will purchase this one really cool

[@FGain]

Regulations are very strict in NYC. I bet only air taxis (eVTOLs) will be allowed, not personal eVTOLs. Thanks for watching L. Hope to see you again on my channel!

[@Reptanimalposts]

Another alternative to batteries is a nuclear fission engine that uses Helium 3. The Helium js lighter than air so it will actually be beneficial. The whole idea lies in the Nuclear Fission engines design and materials used to build it with. As light as possible should be the motive. Love the work. Hopefully one day I can own a flying car.

[@alanthompson4912]

I showed my daughter this and she made a good point, why don't they make it look like the Jetsons vehicle in the cartoon, and I thought, yeah why not

[@FGain]

Because of royalties and extra weight would be my guess

[@rollexcars6173]

Leonardo Da Vinci has a painting with a contraption look alike, we are entering the phase folkd back then imagined for so long, and in the 1800s there is also paintin of how a 1920 would look like, looking like the 1920 the folks in 1800s imagined

[@dbspecials1200]

Could have some amazing commercial, observational and rescue capabilities also..take off weight by using Titanium (expensive) instead of aluminum for the frame. maybe use composites like carbon fibre...shaving weight = adding performance..

[@FGain]

I agree. eVTOLs will have many applications as I discuss on this channel. Thanks for watching!

[@WillieStubbs]

I'd like to make a flat gurney style drone with all of the propellers covered maybe even suck air in through vents on the sides with webbing on top like Molle gear. A rescuer rides on top of the flat surface bucked in with D rings and rescues a jumper from a building or someone dangling over the side of a cliff. Fire engines could carry one on top and use them for swift water rescues as well.

[@tucsonmclean5138]

Safety concerns on the blades .... hope they make other concepts on this craft .. different styles....and drone porpulsion...

[@FGain]

Tucson, you're absolutely right. Exposed blades are definitely a safety concern. The regulators will require some kind of enclosure around them. Thanks for watching, and welcome to the channel!

[@paulpells1864]

For a 'starter' it would be great. If I had the money, yes. Living in London I couldnt use it due to 'whimp' laws, but thats society in general. One day humanity will grow up and come alive - hope lol.

[@FGain]

I hope so too, Paul. Thanks for watching and welcome to the channel!

[@oralabihai459]

If it gets a massive Battery Upgrade , to increase flight time and price is Right..yes I'm ready Looks easy to fly _and Fun. Too..