YOU'RE COWARDLY - Destiny Calls Out NuanceBro On Conservative Panel

[@destiny]

Sargon Admits Destiny Wins Morality Debate ►kzbin.info/www/bejne/pKvOomiobLGtm9k

[@eddierabinovich779]

Love you August :)

[@rebornkingofthule7067]

Come to $PLX loosers

[@rebornkingofthule7067]

Ban social impact bonds crypto an esg

[@vithehoneybadger2641]

Was a fun stream love seeing you on sitch and adams show

[@FamiliarAnomaly]

When are you going to graduate to the adult group.

[@4Y0P]

Don't let these conservatives distract you from the fact that destiny is a name

[@MinecraftGod69420]

Girls name**

[@Tocinos]

Destiny is the name in the world.

[@agente7766]

I'm new to this meme, how did it start?

[@Ladenstarfish]

@@agente7766 It was started in an amazin' way

[@n8pk69]

@@Ladenstarfish amazin.

[@AcrossTheSea12]

The worst part about this panel is somebody openly admitting to going to a restaurant 5m before close

[@tylercsm4690]

Havent got to that part yet. Thats disgusting.

[@Sprite_525]

That should be a misdemeanor lol 😆

[@tylercsm4690]

@@TheWarwolf102 Found the 12 year old who's never worked a service job before.

[@Temperest]

@@TheWarwolf102 how’s school going buddy?

[@bccsivxx-xxivvii]

@@TheWarwolf102 we're talking about restaurants though.

[@SteveDawgNZ]

Hearing Aydin go from saying "you didn't know that" as if Destiny is uninformed for not 'knowing' that people were held without charges, to immediately conceding that actually they have been charged 10 seconds later at 10:30 is incredible. Just blatant bad faith.

[@Adumbbomb810]

I don't think Aydin is bad faith there, she just genuinely has no idea what she's talking about.

[@Tocinos]

Literally says, "obviously there were higher charges." after implying twice that there were no higher charges. My brain...

[@SteveDawgNZ]

@@Adumbbomb810 If she has no idea, why would she try to rub-in that Destiny is unaware?

[@mr.dolphin8345]

@@Adumbbomb810 wouldn’t that still be bad faith?

[@KhaalixD]

It's a woman, what do you expect?

[@Rmashups]

I like how Aydin’s strategy is saying something really fucking stupid, get proven wrong, concede but don’t change the point

[@Kittylover074]

I swear listening to her gives me brain cancer

[@tigresuave11]

@@Stop_Gooning But you run the risk of being wrong. When she spits bullsh** that goes unchecked, then she can appear smart. When she is proven wrong, she can act like she was just being curious or asking questions. If she tried to bull through every time she was proven wrong, she would look like an idiot because almost everything that comes out of her mouth is either untrue, misleading, or just so stupid that no sane person could believe it.

[@theimmortal4718]

@@Stop_Gooning Screaming "Russian collision, you fascist!" is much more effective

[@aidanclare6602]

It's like she's used to making up exorbitant statements that would be scathing if true, but the people she usually spouts off to don't care enough to confront her on it. That's why she keeps having to roll things back.

[@false-set]

@@theimmortal4718 depending on the question asked, that's a perfect answer.

[@MuerteSigiliosa]

"Trump was never been good at picking people " The same people used to say in 2016 That one of the reasons to elect him was that he as a business would find the best people to fulfill his agenda

[@100AcreWoodz1]

Trump supporters speech will warp to whatever makes daddy trump look competent

[@FondestAlloy56]

Yup DRAIN THE SWAMP they said while trump was shitting into the swamp right in front of them 🙄

[@mikecurry6847]

@Alex Green the tax thing is mind blowing. His tax cut isn't permanent for any of us with lower income but it's permanent for the highest earners. In 2025 (one year after what he thought would be the end of his second term) the tax cut for everybody but the highest earners doesn't just revert back to what it was, it goes up higher to account for the tax cut the rich get. It's literally a tax hike for almost everybody and a cut for only the rich but they all love him for it

[@JWar-]

@Alex Green You added the "wealthy peole to pay their fare share of taxes" part. That was Obama's campaign promise. Believe it or not, conservatives think lower taxes are good for the economy. "The Swamp" according to conservatives are strictly government entities.

[@andrewcox5873]

If you talk to a trump supporter long enough, they’ll admit the only thing he is good at is lowering taxes and pissing off liberals

[@diegoseba12]

I really like this show's rule of no whataboutisms. I remember watching Dylan's and Prime's panels and everytime, and I mean EVERY. SINGLE. TIME. the topics of protests and jan 6th were brought up, cuckservatives immediately went on with "BUT WHAT ABOUT THE DEMOCRATS" and "BUT WHAT ABOUT BLM" which completely turned those panels into shitshows.

[@swampysix9375]

Whataboutism. Aka someone is calling me out for being a hypocrite and instead of owning up to my double standard I’ll just shout a phrase at them to shut the conversation down. The people who made excuses all summer long for violent riots now want to crucify a group for a few hours of rioting. You could be against both, and actually be consistent. I’ll take one of these lefty’s seriously when they admit they should have been more vocally critical of the BLM riots, and they made a mistake in not condemning the violence to the fullest extent possible.

[@kevinwalter4078]

Sure, just ignore political double standards...

[@grizzly311tr]

it's better to shame someone else for stepping in shit than to clean the shit off your own shoes. nice liberal doublethink loser

[@myheartspits]

@@kevinwalter4078 it gets boring when every conversation is about hypocrisy and double standards.

[@kevinwalter4078]

You only think it's boring because you're biased and don't like being called out for having hypocritical outrage.

[@squideww]

Aydin striked me as incredibly insecure, as if she were desperately trying to fit in with "the cool kids". I can't help but think it must be uncomfortable for her to be a girl in an anti sjw circle, where she's constantly the butt of the joke. This might've factored into why it sounded like she was speaking out of her ass backtracking every other sentence. She was just trying to fit in by spouting what she thought would appease the crowd. I might also be overthinking this!

[@ll2323]

I got that same view about her.

[@thenucas]

at least she wasn't drunk this time, like a couple years ago in that cringe convo when she lied about being a professor of "media psychology" (she was a TA in a PR class)

[@ZKrinny]

She has said before she hates debates because it isn’t something that her personality is good for.

[@DodoticsJ4]

i had the exact same read makes sense tbh

[@woodsmand]

Shes a video essayist not a debater. She isn't as skilled at yelling and talking fast like destiny.

[@RandomPerson-dl8qs]

To answer the question around 1:21:06 on why voter turnout was so much higher in Wisconsin & Michigan than Ohio... the former two states were won by Trump in 2016 by margins of 0.8% and 0.2% respectively while the latter was won by a margin of 8%. So obviously there was less reluctance to vote in those two states since it was much more likely to swing than Ohio, which maintained its 8% margin for Trump yet again.

[@mr1nyc]

Anytime you hear “if you think about it,” you are about to hear some wild speculation unsupported by evidence.

[@Scardor]

"That's really interesting, because..." "What's funny is..." are also nice indicators shit is coming.

[@DootyDuck]

@@Scardor U hear those 2 alot from Destiny xD

[@stevestrangelove4970]

if you think about it, my parents do love me.

[@Desklamp22]

@@Scardor lol reminds me of destiny

[@cameronhopewell641]

Anytime you hear, “anytime you hear”, you’re about to hear a hyperbolic statement that lacks nuance. Go listen to Mr. Girl, take some notes, and come back enlightened about how you should never give compliments and always watch cuties.

[@niclastname]

This Aydin's whole strategy was throwing out stupid and completely unsubstantiated claims and hoping people took them at face value, then conceding that she was wrong at the slightest pushback. It's literally like she was just listing off rumors that she has heard and never researched... Wtf was the point? She is a misinformation machine. I bet she constantly spouts off all of these rumors on streams and twitter all day where people just take it as known, when she has 0 evidence. She's literally part of the problem with the world right now.

[@satoshiwasareptiloid3777]

The interesting thing is that most of her channel is the exact opposite of that. When she sticks to her field of study she's extremely thorough, have proper sources for everything and walks through conclusions properly.

[@satoshiwasareptiloid3777]

And in her defense, I think she might have been drunk here. She has a tendency to jump on streams drunk right before going to bed.

[@vishg5148]

@@satoshiwasareptiloid3777hope she sees this bro

[@Jones-ke6bt]

Lady: repeates Facebook boomer talking points. 3 secs later: I misspoke! I might be wrong about that idk. Teehee.

[@andrewcox5873]

Those exchanges are always funny because it’s obvious she’s believed that for months, and will likely repeat it again after being proved wrong, but in the moment she just “misspoke”

[@Jones-ke6bt]

@@andrewcox5873 big true.

[@aarong3340]

Aydin: Theyre being held without charges! -Okay they're not being held without charges but theyre small charges -Okay it's serious charges but its ridiculous we cant even look this up -Okay it's publicly available information but they're being held so long

[@RussianBot1998]

I loved it when Adam kicked her

[@Zach-cn4lb]

Holy shit I am in pain every time Aydin speaks

[@Thezocraticmethod]

oh my fucking god, seriously; who the hell is she? Why is she even on this panel?? I'm not familiar with the other panel members asides from Nuance Bro.

[@BlakeZeb]

@@Thezocraticmethod She’s ran in the sort of gamergate, anti sjw circles for a long time, the same sort of circle that sitch and Adam came from. Didn’t know she was still around though

[@telepathyclub]

@@Thezocraticmethod There's a destiny vid from 2016 called "Destiny debates a female trump supporter from /pol/" where he debates Aydin. She sounds mental in it lol

[@Zach-cn4lb]

@@Thezocraticmethod you should check out mauler, he makes awesome media-focused content and runs a great podcast called efap. Either don’t know or don’t like the other people here

[@matthewpeterson2317]

@@Zach-cn4lb doing the lords work. The rhino milk is on me🥛

[@bobbobino6859]

21:35 "PA broke the constitution, but the courts upheld it" so this guy knows better than whatever court ruled on this obviously. get him in a judges chair. 🥴🥴

[@evaneugenescott]

What kind of dumbazz argument is this? The “courts” also upheld Dredd Scott. The courts often make bad decisions. That isn’t a compelling argument. The fact is that they literally did break their own laws.

[@kgt7500]

He is correct in that instance though. Courts did rule that the mail in voting law passed by Wolf was unconstitutional but the law gets to remain in place while Wolf appeals the decision. The court ruled that the changes would need to be made via a state constitutional amendment and as the law was made, it is unconstitutional. That decision is now going to the state Supreme Court and it's up in the air how they'll rule. The Commonwealth Court cited a bunch from the Supreme Court in their decision so the Supreme Court will need to go against their own prior decisions or reinterpret their prior decisions to overrule the Commonwealth Court decision. That being said, the Commonwealth Court is 3-2 in favor of Republicans and the Supreme Court is majority Democrat so if politics play a role they'll probably side with Wolf.

[@undeadman7676]

@@kgt7500 And keep in mind, this is just the one state that's willing to touch anything regarding the 2020 election malpractice. It doesn't take much to just say "yeah they fucked up royally and that should never happen again, but I don't think you could find any evidence that the vote would have gone the other way in any circumstance". But instead, Destiny takes the least nuanced, most blindly pro-establishment take and shoves his nose up their ass, suggesting they can do no wrong. It's actually so infuriating listening to him talk about this stuff, and it's actively pushing me away from his side. I'd rather have crazy people who can identify a problem than blind people who think our government being on fire is okay.

[@reflect.]

@@undeadman7676 In what world are these Trumpists just trying to “identify” a problem? As if they’re some sort of principled government accountability advocates who care about the sanctity of fair government or something. They’re just riding for Trump and the right-wing. The moment their guy is back in power, even if it means illegally overthrowing an election, they become the blind government sycophants you claim can’t recognize our government is on fire. But no, Destiny didn’t know all the nuances of one situation in a sea of BS and you lose it. Ridiculous. It’s amazing how childishly reflexive people like you are.

[@overtherenowaitthere]

My favorite part is pisco sprinting into the middle of the call huffing and puffing before unzipping and just pissing all over the floor in the middle of the room as everyone is asking who is this guy pissing everywhere making a large yellow puddle. Calling anyone who tries to get out of it a coward and then also conceding that maybe he came into the conversation a bit too hot. 🤣🤣

[@Wiffernubbin]

Pissing is his business and business is good

[@SpikeSystem]

Hey baby, that's the way of the Urination Corporation.

[@powercore2000]

He'd been pressure cooking on the law stuff all debate. I get why he came in so hot, but it was not the right vibe for the room.

[@overtherenowaitthere]

@@powercore2000 I was there lmao he gets way too amped up before finally engaging and it always backfires. And even pisco slightly amped up is just the maximum vibe anyone there could handle lol

[@dreamspeakhomie]

They got away with being cowards so long that he had time to power up the pis meter

[@colkestrel]

Yes, several people are being held without bail in the D.C. Jail for crimes they allegedly committed during the Capitol riots. “But the folks that engaged in the most violent acts, they are being detained without bond.” Which is why people like Julian Khater and George Tanios are still in jail on charges of Assault on Federal Officer with Dangerous Weapon and Conspiracy to Injure an Officer, among others, for allegedly spraying pepper spray into the faces of law enforcement like Capitol Police Officer Brian Sicknick. Thomas Sibick is being held until his trial without bond on charges that include Assaulting, Resisting, or Impeding Certain Officers and Taking from a Person Anything of Value by Force and Violence, because he’s accused of being part of the savage attack on DC Police Officer Mike Fanone and ripping Fanone’s badge and radio right off his uniform. A number of the Proud Boys militia, and even an Oath Keeper named Jessica Watkins, have also been denied pre-trial release, not because they assaulted police, but because they are charged with conspiracy with other members of their militias to pre-plan the attack on the Capitol. So we can Verify, yes, some people arrested for crimes on January 6th are still being held in jail without bail, all of which are being housed at the D.C. Jail. People that have been charged / released for big crimes: Robert Scott Palmer: 63 months in prison pleaded guilty in October to assaulting law enforcement officers with a dangerous weapon. His plea agreement originally called for a 46 to 57 month sentence, but it was increased to 63 months after he wrote on his fundraising website that he had acted in self-defense Devlyn Thompson: 46 months in prison assault with a dangerous weapon Lonnie Leroy Coffman: 46 months in prison pleaded guilty to possession of unregistered weapons Nicholas Languerand: 44 months in prison assaulting, resisting, or impeding officers with a dangerous weapon Jacob Anthony Chansley: 41 months in prison Is the Shaman obstruction of an official proceeding Scott Kevin Fairlamb: 41 months in prison assaulting an officer and obstructing an official proceeding of Congress Greg Rubenacker: 41 months in prison pleading guilty to all 10 charges he faced, including civil disorder and committing an act of physical violence on Capitol grounds Matthew Ryan Miller: 33 months in prison pleaded guilty to communicating a threat across state lines Cleveland Meredith, Jr.: 28 months in prison Michael Curzio: 6 months in prison pleaded guilty to one misdemeanor count Gracyn Dawn Courtright: 1 month in prison pleaded guilty to a charge of entering a restricted building Robert Chapman: 18 months of probation pleaded guilty to “parading, demonstrating or picketing” in a Capitol building Richard Barnett: Awaiting sentencing spending nearly four months in jail on charges including obstructing an official proceeding, entering the Capitol while armed with a deadly or dangerous weapon (a stun gun), and theft of government property (for stealing a piece of government mail) Matthew Greene: Awaiting sentencing He faces up to 25 years in prison, although prosecutors plan to recommend a sentence of 41 to 50 months because he agreed to cooperate with law enforcement. In March, Greene was allowed out of jail and placed in home confinement until he is sentenced

[@EricRamz]

This guy has time on his hands

[@colkestrel]

@@aerotorc One article copy paste baby

[@colkestrel]

@@EricRamz 1 minute on google and copy paste. Not hard. One of them should really just have done this rally then play guessing games. No reason to in this day and age.

[@undeadman7676]

@@aerotorc The entire point of the discourse is centered around arrest dates versus indictment dates, which colksetrel conveniently leaves out. If a person is held for more than 48 hours without being formally charged, or if there isn't an initial determination from a judge that probable cause is enough to detain the person for longer, then whatever government body that is detaining that person has the legal obligation to set them loose. Every. Single. Time. The overwhelming majority of these people, with a very quick google search, either don't have their arrest dates public(which is immediate cause for concern and usually indicative of illegal detainment) or show at least a month and up to a year gap between being arrested and being formally indicted. The only exceptions I could find were the people arrested on 1/6 for assault, but even a handful of those far exceeded the 48 hour window and went up to a week. If you would have taken your own advice instead of lying, you would have known this. :) I'm not implying that these detentions are unlawful. They're irrefutably unlawful, and every single legal jurisdiction that has integrity would have thrown the overwhelming majority of these cases out because it opens the FBI and any presiding judge up to a harassment/kidnapping lawsuit.

[@undeadman7676]

@@colkestrel You're gloating as if you didn't miss the entire definition of "unlawful arrest". Everything you said is true, and couldn't be less relevant to the argument. Post the arrest dates versus indictment dates. That's the only relevant piece of information.

[@K.I.A22]

45:20 Damn bro he literally shut her up like 4 times while the others were babbling but when SHE interjected it's "stfu and let them speak." Then she's the first to go.

[@justinsmith413]

Yea that was kinda pathetic

[@fittestostrich1294]

Yeah like bro, just say you hate women LOL.

[@sapoperro22]

Really annoying honestly

[@overtherenowaitthere]

He was probably crushed that she didn’t give a shit about leaving. Just like ah shit you’re not gonna ask why? I’ve been shitty to you the whole time why don’t you answer

[@astrojello6882]

Bruh when she says, "they are just there to support Trump" SUPPORT TRUMP WITH WHAT

[@bentrinker1937]

Right?

[@Tocinos]

I only invaded Nanking to support Chiang Kai-shek.

[@fungdark8270]

It’s pretty simple. Most people there were just as a display of “fuck you, I’m mad” They really believed the election was stolen, so the protested. Is that really hard to get? The problem was that it wasn’t true and that the president fomented it

[@Justjay114]

To support Trump's presidency. I thought that was pretty obvious.

[@MoreMonarchy]

"that's not my agenda to win an argument" after the claim that his entire argument hinged on was shown to be false (by over 20 percentage points actually). sure dude

[@Fernarav]

"trespassing was the highest charge" Destiny: no it wasn't. "Trespassing wasn't the highest charge" Man, weasel tactics are the best.

[@bccsivxx-xxivvii]

@@swickens930 What Destiny did is not semantics. That word doesn't mean what you apparently think or want it to mean. The statement was untrue on a very basic level. What the hell is "pretty accurate"? Something is either accurate or it's not. You're trying to play semantics while ignoring the facts because you want to paint a narrative in a more favorable light. No regard for the truth of the situation. You want it to be one way but it's the other way. Your 1 in 1,000 analogy is utter nonsense. Many of these people weren't just in an area they weren't supposed to be. They ignored or overtook law enforcement and broke into the building by force. 140 cops were injured. Almost 900 people have been charged at this point. - Over 200 people with charges related to violence and/or assault. - 60+ with destruction of property. - 40+ with theft. - 59 with conspiracy. Around 80 of those charges involved a weapon. There are several other charges I didn't list and of course there are more charges to come. They're not even charging everyone who simply entered the building, much less anyone who was just on the grounds. Several of the people they did charge with trespassing alone are getting deferred prosecution which is like probation that ends in a dismissal with no jail time if the conditions are met. They're not throwing the book at them. All this data is readily available from the DOJ. Search DOJ Capitol Breach Cases and it should be the first result. So don't try to tell me I pulled these facts and numbers out of thin air like you did. Take your one in a thousand BS and shove it up your reality-denying ass.

[@tb8654]

@@swickens930 I bet you're not going to respond, and please learn how to apply the word "semantics", there's a dramatic difference here when she was suggesting that the only charges applied were all pertaining to Trespassing, and that trespassing was the worse thing that occurred and yet it's taking long to proceed with each case, which is a false narrative

[@tb8654]

@@swickens930 how is she not exaggerating when she had the stance that there were people still in jail 2 years later waiting to be charged and then immediately flip flopped? I'm not using semantics, the majority of people engaged only in trespassing but the ones that were waiting much longer than normal tend to not be the ones who were given a simple charge of only trespassing. And yes, some suspects did get treated worse, I wasn't arguing against that

[@lobosolo7675]

@1:01:20 Nuance Bro's analogy is dumb. Justice Breyer is talking about a precedent that should be overturned but likely needs a court that directly challenges it not a procedural court case that needs to be adressed

[@Omni-LiberalWorldOrder]

Wow Destiny, even though you don't make your own youtube videos and its actually someone else that handles it, how DARE you label Adam and Sitch, the greatest content creators of our generation, a CONSERVATIVE panel. I am disgusted and totally outraged by this development

[@Zach0451]

Adam and Sitch is a brainlet panel

[@terencebc]

What? Adam is obviously conservative. His stance on the Sargon conversation made this pretty obvious.

[@Zach0451]

@@terencebc Adam isn't conservative, he's just really dumb.

[@Bai_Su_Zhen]

They are closer to the center than most and I know they brand themselves as centrists but they are clearly right-leaning.

[@lucasgoncalvesdefaria7121]

They r clearly right-leaning. You can just admit you enjoy it regardless, but don't fool yourself

[@Shlumpledink]

People are like "why doesn't Destiny talk to conservatives?" Because when they do talk to him, they get wrecked

[@itscebby8882]

God I'd love to see him vs Shapiro. We might have to slow the video down but I'd definitely be a fun debate.

[@topd7566]

@@itscebby8882 please destiny, make this happen

[@MrSumone]

He debates obscure, delusional, autistic conservatives

[@elton1211]

13:10 She's describing an issue with a court system that's over burdened. Part of what the left brings up is how people can be charged but due to court back log they don't see trial for years. It's not specific to the people being held particularly.

[@elton1211]

@@womenrespecter879 As a lefty, I find myself laughing at the fact that of course now they care and wanna talk about the court system 's issue, something we've been complaining about for years. But instead of tackling the actual problem, it's a governmental conspiracy that ONLY affects the MAGA base. It's so absurd it necessitates laughter.

[@RanEncounter]

@@womenrespecter879 Yeah because you saw a couple of leftist laugh at them that means the left as a whole laughs at them. How deep are you into this tribalism shit?

[@blakeb9964]

She doesn't care about them, just a couple of traitors.

[@leadfaun]

These titles are getting shittier and shittier.

[@13enwarner]

Aydin is saying a lot of stupid stuff and instantly walking it back, but this is hard to listen to because it feels like she's being bullied so hard. I actually felt bad that there wasn't some more assertive Trumpster on the panel to back her up.

[@adamk.2336]

I was actually upset that she didn't appear to take in anything. She might have backed off a couple points (maybe you could call it conceding) but it sounds like everything just rolled off her brain and that she is unconvinceable despite all her claims being blown to pieces. In other words, she was repeating propaganda points and showing no signs of movement.

[@Aeruthus]

It was bothering me too and I don't even like her or her views. I was trying to figure out whether or not the host was being sexist or just doesn't like her or what. He kept correcting her on how she's interrupting other people, meanwhile she gets interrupted almost every time she speaks and really only starts regularly interrupting other people towards the end after constantly getting talked over.

[@BedrockPorkchop]

She seemed like a typical redditor who hasn’t even researched anything she said a lot of what she was saying was documented to be untrue and originate from rumors.

[@blakeb9964]

Lol she deserved worse

[@blakeb9964]

​@@adamk.2336exactly. You know she'll repeat those same things again, even tho she was proven a liar.

[@slanderman92]

Ah yes, my favorite “conservatives”: Sitch, Adam, and Mauler.

[@meaninglesswords1082]

If you're trying to be grammatically correct, you should put the comma inside the quotation marks.

[@atlaskinzel6560]

@@meaninglesswords1082 pretty sure a comma doesn't even really make sense there; there should be a colon.

[@axson8]

I dunno man, Social Democrat DoomerMedia's pretty conservative

[@meaninglesswords1082]

@@atlaskinzel6560 I think you're right, now that I thought about it, more. The colon would still be in the quotation marks, though

[@maxtormanen9351]

@@meaninglesswords1082 orthography is an arbitrary social construct. He's writing in his own dialectical style

[@FusionArmorX]

57:00 - I've heard of those cases, I believe those were Republican filings in Pennsylvania challenging the legitimacy of how the mail-in ballot procedures were implemented. The specifics are that Pennsylvania's Democrat-run Supreme Court allowed counties in the state to count mail-in ballots for up to 3 days after election day if they were postmarked, presumably due to their local postal services' delays. That was one of the many cases filed by the Republican state legislature. The matter was escalated to SCOTUS after the election, and as this was not long after RBG died but before ACB was added, and the decision ended on a rare 4-4 split. Justices Thomas and Alito wrote dissents. Snippets from both: Thomas: "One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us. I respectfully dissent." Alito: "The provisions of the Federal Constitution conferring on state legislatures, not state courts, the authority to make rules governing federal elections would be meaningless if a state court could override the rules adopted by the legislature simply by claiming that a state constitutional provision gave the courts the authority to make whatever rules it thought appropriate for the conduct of a fair election."

[@peewee130946]

It’s fucking insane how conservatives still try to say it’s destiny’s fault for what Johntron said like what happened to personal accountability

[@etrs]

To be fair, nobody here really made any accusations.

[@peewee130946]

@@0doublezero0 who said anything about Adam?

[@tristanheaton2127]

@@0doublezero0 what is he then

[@peewee130946]

@@swickens930 oh man I’ve never seen somebody just completely miss the point I don’t believe in the “personal responsibility” I’m using your guys logic to make fun of how absolutely hypocritical you guys are. Lmao nice attempt though

[@peewee130946]

@@swickens930 wow you really are just sub 40 iq well I would love to explain to you basic reading comprehension, but I’m sure just like logic it would go in one ear and out the other so keep coping hard have a nice day, and as always remember Donald trump lost to the great patriot joe biden god bless America 🇺🇸

[@fossilizedindividual8072]

I love watching Destiny go on these center or right-leaning panels that aren't just 100% bloodsports

[@RussianBot1998]

Sitch and Adam are centre left

[@onodatboi9041]

They're not a conservative panel, it's a COMEDY SHOW

[@Tocinos]

"This isn't water, it's h2o"

[@etrs]

@@Tocinos actually its aqua

[@Tocinos]

@@etrs ok voosh

[@mr.dolphin8345]

XD

[@rabiespuddings1735]

@@Tocinos lmao

[@hubbabubba8083]

Ben Burgis makes me want to blow my nose even when I don’t have to

[@allisonoram54]

its crazy how freely people will just keep saying factually untrue shit, get called on it, back up their statement, and then repeat. insane.

[@BigLundi]

"You're doing a logical fallacy, a reductio ad absurdium." So, a reductio isn't a logical fallacy. What it is, is a method of analysis. Wherein you take an argument, take it to its logical conclusion, and via the absurdity of the conclusion, we can detect that there is something faulty about the reasoning. If what you say is true, then that means X. X is not true, so what you say must be false.

[@r.m8146]

It can also be used as a fallacy when you synthesize the argument to the point that the original meaning is lost and with the intention of making it sound absurd.

[@theasassinator]

@@r.m8146 that's strawmaning

[@r.m8146]

@@theasassinator Strawmaning is not necessarily a reduced argument....

[@BigLundi]

@@swickens930 If the logical conclusion is wrong then it's not a reductio ad absurdum, it's just a strawman.

[@BigLundi]

@@swickens930 No...A reductio ad absurdum is not in and of itself a strawman. It's a very simple argument. If what you say is true, then X must also be true. X is not true, therefore what you're saying is not true. There's loads of ways to make the argument incorrectly, sure, but that doesn't mean the argument itself isn't a valid way to argue.

[@VTRDC27]

The cycle of Aydin: Say something that is factually incorrect. Walk it back. Repeat.

[@mikecurry6847]

I don't understand why Sean is saying that we need a charge for someone to turn informant. It really depends on how fast someone flips. If the feds make a strong enough argument for Epps to turn, they might not need to file charges. If Epps didn't want to cooperate then they'd file the charges to apply pressure and follow through if he didn't crack. If he was cooperative right off the bat, they wouldn't file them at all. For them it's actually preferable to not file the charges because they can always go back and prosecute later if Epps fails to keep his end of the bargain. I really don't understand why Sean thinks that because there were no charges that Epps couldn't have turned informant, that's honestly a strange argument.

[@mikecurry6847]

Also not every informant shows up in court. If they keep his status as an informant unknown then he could get more information in the future. An informant doesn't have to testify in court either. Epps can just point the feds at people they want to bust more than Epps himself. We don't know if he turned informant but we also don't have anything that says he for sure didn't

[@bccsivxx-xxivvii]

To go towards your point, it's also preferable for the prosecution because the quid pro quo is less obvious when it goes in front of a jury.

[@Boots43096]

i love how mauler is slipping into destinys content here and there, interesting to see how he interacts with destiny as both of them are used to debate (albeit in different fields)

[@proudtobeme1ashkente]

A highlights channel uploaded a whole 1 hour conversation just between the two of them. I was pretty happy seeing Destiny on EFAP, but got scared that the misunderstanding about the format and his chat might've squandered any possibility of similar crossovers. I hope there'll be many more interesting conversations to come.

[@Boots43096]

@@proudtobeme1ashkente can you link video I wanna make sure I didn't miss it lol Unless you mean the vaush discussion in which case I saw it

[@proudtobeme1ashkente]

@@Boots43096 Sure. /watch?v=Fm1_qYNKv6g "Destiny Talks w/ MauLer (Bloodborne, The Batman, Plot Holes, Death Note, Game of Thrones s8)" Tbf, I just searched "Mauler Destiny" in the search bar after Mauler alluded to a previous discussion between them during the Star Wars portion of the Adam & Sitch stream, which wasn't posted to this channel. I'm not sure this is the talk he meant but hey, it's still a fun conversation.

[@yewtewbstew547]

@@proudtobeme1ashkente thanks

[@TophinatorStreams]

That debate with JonTron was done in good faith with SO many lifelines! The only one who cancelled Jon was Jon.

[@jack17jackson3]

We need the Star wars debate PLS AUGUST it was so fucking good

[@kristianvaisanen7608]

it was absolutely horrible, closest I've ever been to minecrafting myself

[@imther1upedyrmom2]

@@kristianvaisanen7608 which take was the one that almost did it ?

[@kristianvaisanen7608]

@@imther1upedyrmom2 can't honestly say, too many to choose from, maybe Adam muting everyone and gurgling nonsense when it seemed mauler was starting to get through to destiny (or just almost everyone shouting some garbage takes at destiny all at the same time)

[@kristianvaisanen7608]

@@Big-Papa-Smurf prequels are bad, sequels are even worse

[@haruhirogrimgar6047]

@@Big-Papa-Smurf All of them are trash.

[@temporaryusername11]

13:30 them saying that it doesn’t take 2 years is normally true but since Covid happened there is a back log of cases around America and a lot of things from two years ago are just now proceeding

[@paulspringwood7190]

That Aydin Chick talks way too much for a person with an annoying voice

[@amp4105]

really a case of someone simply not made to debate politics, constantly stuttering and saying NOTHING whilst taking 15 minutes to say anything.

[@arkad6329]

Pisco was absolutely out of line with personal attacks on Joe.

[@bentrinker1937]

Good for Adam for changing his mind! I still think he’s dumb but at least he can change his mind when shown evidence/context.

[@mr.dolphin8345]

Adam regularly calls himself dumb and changes his mind often. He has his topics where he digs his heels in (like objective morality) but I’ve always appreciated his transparency and willingness to listen and change his mind

[@bentrinker1937]

@@mr.dolphin8345 I think it’s wild you can come away thinking that call was anything other than a shakedown to have raffensberger “find the votes”, do what ever you can to make sure I win GA, but maybe adam only saw the call in bits and snippets through the lens of conservative media. Which I haven’t seen but it’s possible that partisan propaganda made the call look fine. I think the later is what happened.

[@mr.dolphin8345]

@@bentrinker1937 could be. Sitch and Adam both hate TDS, but lately they’re starting to realize a lot of TDS isn’t irrational lol

[@angelantayhua3096]

Mr. Dolphin kinda sad tbh in 2022...

[@mr.dolphin8345]

@@angelantayhua3096 it’s alright. They’re coming around to it. It’s not like they liked Trump in the first place.

[@brokendeck08]

Id like to say this in as nice and least sexist way possible: AP makes every convo shes involved in worse.

[@EricRamz]

Why?.. cuz she’s a woman??

[@soundoman2334]

@@EricRamz no, because she keeps making these claims without evidence and she keeps interrupting and jumping into peoples points with no new information

[@acenine8149]

Destiny you are dead wrong about the Pennsylvania election law change. The legislature did not change the law. It was done in abject opposition to the established procedure. The judge in that case ruled that that was what happened but because the election is already over, there’s nothing to be done so oh well. This knowledge is widely available. Sean Parnell, the plaintiff in the suit detailed the whole thing on Timcast back in the day.

[@undeadman7676]

This is why I can't take his pro-establishment takes seriously. Refusing to criticize something so obviously bad for our democracy is just jarring to listen to considering how nuanced he is in most conversations. You don't have to think the 2020 election was fraudulent to point out how irrefutably illegal some of the states' voting practices were.

[@dageustice]

Didn't watch the entire video, is this about the in person voting requirement?

[@andrewcox5873]

Never heard someone be criticized for being “too nuanced” before lol. Destiny handled it fine, they were debating why the Jan 6 rioters got so fired up from voter fraud, and it was definitely not from law changes in Pennsylvania. It was not the right time to derail a line of questioning on Trump’s culpability with some bullshit theory that democrats are to blame.

[@bertthompson4748]

There was no ruling for that case. The judges threw it out because it didnt meet deadline for a challenge of a law. Can you give me a quote from the judges on this issue or are you just going off what the plaintiff said on timcast?

[@bertthompson4748]

Unsatisfied with the results of that wager, they would now flip over the table, scattering to the shadows the votes of millions of Pennsylvanians," Justice David Wecht wrote in a statement concurring with the three-page order. "It is not our role to lend legitimacy to such transparent and untimely efforts to subvert the will of Pennsylvania voters."

[@tarzanizcool]

Dude this poor woman seems so insecure. Laughing too hard at wholly unfunny jokes made at her expense, taking a condescending attitude at the WORST possible times, and making totally absurd claims and backtracking. Shits rough.

[@tenhauser]

Adam was the judge, Aydin was the gavel. Every time things got out of order, Adam would beat on her.

[@crasykills4718]

Why was adam bullying her 😂

[@tenhauser]

@@crasykills4718 I'm starting to feel like he always does.

[@crasykills4718]

@@tenhauser maybe he's got a schoolyard crush

[@tenhauser]

@@crasykills4718 Yeah, that had crossed my mind, lmao

[@2xRainb0w]

@@tenhauser she’s been on the show heaps, I think her constant “mhm” and “yeh”s finally got to him lmao.

[@Sutherus]

*Joe Nierman* 1:26:14 "You don't - Nuance - Nuance, you don't understand Trump at all." 1:27:10 (to Nuance Bro) "I wasn't referencing YOU, Nuance Bro. I was saying - I was saying, you guys don't understand the nuance of the politics. I wasn't talking about YOU specifically." I dunno about that one, Chief.

[@Ryattt81]

Everyone talking about Aydin, but the old man who replaced her is the definition of boomer brain.

[@pazmello]

Don’t forget that 2 presidents who lost the popular vote have chosen 2/3 of the Supreme Court.

[@Boredasfuck29]

Sounds good to me, we're a lot better off than we would be if the Dems were allowed to put more p3d0f1le defenders on the court. Honestly, the last couple years have convinced me that we need to start thinking about who does and does not deserve certain rights (I'm thinking you belong in the latter category.)

[@blueygooey8899]

I think I'm most proud of being a destiny fan when he has jan 6th debates

[@flywillis5684]

How do people like Aydin exist? She is insanely misinformed on just about everything. And then that dude comes on and his first point is "the govt should reveal its informant in an ongoing investigation." What a dunce.

[@snake2250]

Wait, am I fucking insane? Was Aydin Paladin not that psycho chick who accused Destiny of doxxing then went on for months about how she was trying to sue him for shit?

[@mikeinfected]

So Conservetiaves want to find any excuse for losing even if they aren't using those excuses but they are and they aren't and they are again. And they are constantly stating opinions are facts and objective truth except when they admit they aren't seconds later and they were guessing.

[@Wowowowowowowowowowowowow]

Every Jan 6 conversation is completely brain dead.

[@mikecurry6847]

That dude in the middle thinks that anything with a Latin name is a fallacy lol. "Reductio ad absurdum," reduction to the absurd, is a legitimate form of argument. It's not a logical fallacy.

[@theshadowbadger]

Conservative panel?

[@leadfaun]

Yeah, MauLer is a conservative Nazi anti-SJW. So I’ve heard.

[@theshadowbadger]

@@leadfaun he also a communist anti-anti SJW who streams with rags, a known leftist. So I’ve heard. 🤣

[@chrismills7703]

The guy who said he liked Trump for his policy.... *especially* his foreign policy??? What a hot take lol

[@kimbonice]

That guy Pisco coming in hot & immediately getting owned was hilarious

[@2xRainb0w]

Both SaA chat and destiny’s chat collectively shitting on him haha

[@raulramirez1622]

I dont think sitch and adam would apreciate their show being called conservative panel other than that nice convo

[@frostbite3318]

@@josdriehoek1276 conservatives hate being called conservative lol

[@sabelotoda2]

@@josdriehoek1276 no they are centrist.

[@souloftheworld9810]

@@josdriehoek1276 okay, list all of the conservative values (or positions) they have, and liberal values they have. Let's evaluate this without being brain dead.

[@raulramirez1622]

@@josdriehoek1276 tell me that you habe not watch their content without saying it 10/10 you are good at memes

[@imther1upedyrmom2]

@@josdriehoek1276 that's based on nothing though , if you knew both of their positions you'd know if you sat down and actually watched their stuff.

[@NewYorksMostWanted]

I'm genuinely impressed how guy on the middle-left was able to keep the same pose for 90% of the entire video.

[@Bryrye236]

Its crazy that nobody here seems to actually know all that much about the facts. Yet they have such firm positions on everything. Its hard to take any of them seriously.

[@SaltyReverend]

I love how these people who are super anti-media assume journalists are bad people or liars. Like you supposedly care about the truth but you have done nothing to enter into the field journalism yet this person who actually sought a career in journalism clearly cares less than them sure lol, Also at 51:00 Joe says he doesn't admire trump for picking candidates for positions at all. ARGUABLY THATS THE MOST IMPORTANT FUNCTIONS OF YOUR PRESIDENT but they dont understand the politics they wanna participate in so they don't care.

[@SaltyReverend]

@@swickens930 you are too far gone for your opinion to matter bud

[@jessiejoy1703]

Oh man MORE content with AJW and Destiny!!!! Love them both and love their quarrels

[@godwinwong2809]

Been a while since I've witnessed someone as confident as Joe defending Trump, but be so far from the truth and reality.

[@Jedscorp]

How do you know that what is being presented in the show trial is real ? That panel lies all the time

[@spycemyster]

@@Jedscorp I mean, every claim they made is easily fact-checkable

[@Jedscorp]

@@spycemyster but they don’t believe in the fact checkers that are “debunking” their ideas . That’s why the situation is broken but if you can’t understand where they are coming from why even bother

[@spycemyster]

@@Jedscorp I'm not sure if we're on the same wavelength here. For example, that Aydin person kept making BS claims about the election and Trump. But when someone else pushed back on it, she admitted she either willfully lied or didn't know what she was talking about "Teehee, you caught me spreading misinformation". Joe was doing the same thing. He was making claims like "How did these states get 90+% turnout". And when someone pushed back, he retreated to "How did these states get 90+% turnout from registered voters?", and when someone pushed back again, "how did these states get more turnout (not necessarily 90+% then other states?". If we look at this from "both sides", it was pretty clear how dishonest that side was presenting their arguments and being ULTRA charitable to Trump, but massively bad faith to the media, AOC, or Democrats in general.

[@Jedscorp]

@@spycemyster I appreciate you taking the time to write this out to me . I understand what you are saying and from your perspective its understandable . Did you read that times article about the cabal of rich and influencial people democrats and rebuplicans who worked together to get rid of trump . There is no information to back up any of the points the right is trying to make because they have zero institutional support . There is something there if you read the article I will go over it . In the end trump is being a baby and it doesnt matter anyways but he was probably screwed over

[@thejdaz]

For being a political commenter, it sure seemed like Aydin Paladin had no idea what's going on in the real world. GG Destiny and panel for fact checking her in real time

[@trex2251]

Tbh, jontron said more cancelable-adjacent stuff than anyone that appeared on internet historian

[@darkencypher]

Cancelable-adjacent? I hate the fact that I get what that means... But JFC the lingo we're using now... 🙈

[@iwannabethekid34xc]

@@darkencypher and you keep going along with it because you're a pushover and a beta male. Sad!

[@trex2251]

@@darkencypher dude that was a bitch to type with one hand 😂

[@fantasyskeep]

If they're held longer than the period of time they are bound to serve, they will get time served and be released. Absolutely none of these cases would be dismissed in any court.

[@Roftastic]

1:13:40 Destiny: Whose testimony wont they take?! Answer: Steve Bannon. They wont take Steve Bannon. Yikes. Should we tell him?

[@iwannabethekid34xc]

Des(tiny) literally let's his girlfriend fuck other guys, who cares lol

[@FusionArmorX]

>Date: 17 Jul 2022 This was recorded before the verdict dropped.

[@Roftastic]

@@FusionArmorX that's kinda the point.

[@Nostalgicrecollections]

Funny watching this now a days because I’ve gotten about 10 political ads in the mail telling me to vote by mail for Trump or for an absentee ballot. 😂

[@Jrez]

Is Nuance Bro's name supposed to be ironic?

[@bertthompson4748]

Theres a term for it. If a channel has Truth, Facts, Nuance, Logic or any other thing pertaining to knowledge that channel will deal almost entirely on conjecture and bias.

[@soonforget]

The sad thing is that this Aydin person keeps saying unbelievably dumb stuff with strong conviction. If destiny wasn’t there she wouldn’t even be challenged on these falsehoods. Ergo, on her own stream she must just spew these lies unchecked. This is why people are stupid.

[@DB1Dragoon]

You don't know Adam, bruh if she says something too stupid he'll just kick her off.

[@Doolz51]

Bro It took me 30 mins to figure out Reid wasnt a profile picture...

[@pazmello]

Conservative: It’s not bad to legally protest Destiny: Inside the capital is illegally protesting Conservative: I mean earlier! Let’s see if they use those same arguments when we’re talking about BLM riots. When the majority of the rioters aren’t even the same group of people who peacefully protested during the day. I genuinely think some conservatives are brain dead.

[@Boredasfuck29]

I just think we shouldn't even entertain discussions about Jan. 6. Until we see real justice for the actions of these people during the Spring/Summer riots of 2020, I just don't care. Oh no, some boomers made politicians soil their pants after the police let them in the building (caught on camera btw.)

[@pazmello]

@@Boredasfuck29 to compare breaking into the capital while congress was in session and attempting to steal secured documents, to breaking a local subway window and scaring some store owners while the business is closed… Just kind of tells me some people don’t care about what these people were doing, it’s about who were the people doing it. Laughable at best. Get help.

[@Trigonxv1]

Really now a conservative panel?

[@egusisoup1826]

Lmao, august knows how to increase engagement lol

[@Trigonxv1]

@@egusisoup1826 true enough I see the hustle but its still dishonest lol

[@googley98]

Pretty much yeah. Not all in terms of philosophy, but support basically.

[@Trigonxv1]

@@googley98 UHmazing supporting some things conservatives say make you wholesale conservative

[@googley98]

@@Trigonxv1 Nope. Supporting and defending most things they say on most relevant issues makes you a conservative in every practical sense. Who you support and defend is way more impactful than your personal feelings.

[@blake4197]

Lmao reductio ad absurdum isn't even a fallacy. It's a perfectly reasonable thing to do. "There is no smallest number because if there was, you could divide it by 2 and get a smaller number" or "the earth isn't flat because if it was people would fall off" are reductio ad absurdum. No biggie

[@axson8]

All I know is that Luke Skywalker would've stormed the capital

[@Kev7035]

All i know is that joe biden is literally palpatine

[@darkencypher]

Sean Fitzgerald sounds like the only calm, rational, non-screaming-over-other-people person on this panel... and I think I'm in love.

[@mikecurry6847]

He has a KZbin channel. I think it's called actual justice warrior. I watch his videos sometimes. He still falls into partisanship sometimes and defaults to the right, but most of the time his arguments are challenging at the very least. Hell he's changed my mind on stuff before

[@fungdark8270]

@@mikecurry6847 spot on, he seems very genuine at least and pretty smart.

[@TobyElmendorf]

Yea Sean is good, AJW always debates well and in decent faith

[@TurtleFlowerboi]

JonTron is HILARIOUS, but after the Destiny debate, I never wanted to watch his content ever again.

[@gambitbeats2154]

Ahh Actual Justice Warrior is being kind of bad faith here, because he talked about how he was critical of trump 2 and 3 years before where he should've faught it legally but didn't until after the election.. so while he was being honest on his videos, hrs not keeping that same energy here.. kind of a let down, unless i missed ot since im listening (again) on 1.5 speed for time saving

[@storminmormn6283]

I'd love to see more Reed on panels with Destiny. I love his Street Epistemology videos

[@zacharybunker1135]

MMMM based

[@damon22441]

For the asininity around the 1:18:00 mark: The man was wrong to claim a state turned out with 90%, as everyone figured out quickly, but it is ABSOLUTELY absurd to claim that such a number would be normal anyhow, which everyone else did until the numbers were said aloud shortly after. Garbage moment for everyone.

[@souloftheworld9810]

That title is a little bit dishonest, August. I don't think it's good to misrepresent somebody, especially when you go on their show.

[@vishg5148]

Stop crying please

[@HomoErectus311]

Triggered

[@souloftheworld9810]

Yeah, I do get a bit triggered when somebody is mischaracterized. Problem?

[@codyb.3015]

They both make content off of one another. If they really took issue with it, I'm sure they can handle talking to Destiny about themselves, lmao. Also, what's conservative to you might not be conservative to someone else and vise-versa, you act as though "conservative" has a strict definition that hasn't changed with time. (And fwiw, what someone calls themselves doesn't really matter a whole lot)

[@Jon-vx4bh]

These bloodsport unregulated panels are super aids. I wouldn't mind these conversations if you guys didn't feel the need to interrupt each other constantly, Destiny included.

[@BlakeZeb]

Lot of comments talking about Aydin, but man. Nuance bro was getting under my skin during the Jan 6th stuff. “An unarmed coup?” “Their right to peacefully protest?” Just the disingenuous questions where he could fit them in, but more or less ignoring the criticisms being made about Jan 6

[@jumantewashington8715]

No shots were fired by the rioters.

[@BlakeZeb]

@@jumantewashington8715 K? And?

[@jumantewashington8715]

@@BlakeZeb Wow, you've got a black friend-you should go on Jimmy Kimmel.

[@BlakeZeb]

@@jumantewashington8715 Least irrelevant conservative clap back.

[@jumantewashington8715]

@@BlakeZeb Did you pick those words out of your black friend's hat and put them together?

[@LonnyH]

Pisco's cameo at the end was actual God tier content. I'm sitting here laughing my ass off at the duckerz in chat 😂😂

[@budgie9006]

I swear Nuance Bro's brain sheds one layer with each word he speaks. Edit 1: At this point, every time Nuance Bro starts talking, I just fast forward through his parts. Edit 2: I am at 1:18:50, the guy in the middle... I thought Nuance Bro was bad but damn... this guy is so much worse.

[@MiserableEffect]

This Joe guy is a huge fan of micro-aversions within the debate. He subtly moves from defending one small point to another as soon as he’s pinned against a wall. Guy has no argument, just arrogance

[@satoshiwasareptiloid3777]

He's a lawyer. Also, he was basically the only conservative getting ganged up on, in a physical fight that's when you want to avoid getting pinned against a wall.

[@Wiffernubbin]

46:00 why doesn't the FBI just out their own witnesses and informants? Answer me that destiny?

[@bertthompson4748]

Is this a serious question?

[@vincentzhaiven4017]

Clearly you're kidding , you should be able to figure that out for yourself.

[@Moped_Mike]

Getting held with no bail and no trial…. Cmon you can’t defend that? People are released everyday for worse crimes

[@andrewcox5873]

No one was held without trial, they waived their right to a speedy trial. Which is very common, as defense attorneys want time negotiate plea deals and such. From there, trials often take months and years. Very common. Can’t speak to the no bail thing, not knowledgeable enough on who was held without bail and what the reason was

[@HDWABBIT]

Still debating January 6? i sleep.

[@attackmaster519]

It's the only optical win leftists have at the moment. They have nothing on guns, shot themselves on the foot on abortions, have a shitty economy. Optically, it's a shit time to be a leftist right now. And so they have to fall back to the tried and true method of the man who lives rent free in all their heads, the bad orange man.

[@Tocinos]

Conservative fanfiction review.

[@connerstines1578]

It WAS worse than 9/11, Pearl Harbor and the entire 20th century in warfare combined after all.

[@garysmokesoak8691]

Whoever thought having 10 people in a call was a good idea, I am quite concerned for you.

[@BridgetBuns92]

TBF that stream was advertised as a shitshow with too many people on at once, I'm surprised it didn't get messier

[@AKABattousai]

It was their 200th podcast episode, and they basically invited a half years worth of guests for like a 10 hour stream. They were not doing strict moderation either. And none of them do panel shows regularly.

[@jetjet6560]

I honestly believe this is where Destiny thrives the most: dunking on idiots 😆 Would be cool to see Destiny talk with/debate people in public tho

[@Shoxie_g]

I'm a simply man. If I see hunter avalone i close the video.

[@LuciusSicarius]

lol, man Pisco got way too heated at the end there.

[@DOSPenguin]

They basically entrapped him when they let him in when the other guy was leaving. Also the guy started with you "seem upset".

[@LuciusSicarius]

@@DOSPenguin I mean Pisco did seem really upset. His tone was extremely hostile right from the start. I'm not at all surprised the guy fired back, nor do I blame him.

[@fantasyskeep]

Various state election laws change every single election cycle. The fact that laws changed is a non-starter.

[@markymark637]

Ray Epps was definitely a fed

[@Pipeman007]

100 percent . so obvious .

[@TeecueDee]

It's beyond mind numbing, that Epps is the guy on video inciting illegal activity the very most out of anyone & is also the guy that the left/TDS crowd is the least curious about.

[@Pipeman007]

@@TeecueDee they know he's a Fed but they don't want to address it because it blow up their whole argument

[@SamadKhan-lm8zr]

That was an insane amount of ridiculous claims, being called out and forced to walk it back then making more claims with no proof.

[@mr.dolphin8345]

So Sitch, Adam, and Doomer are conservatives? Hmmm

[@ericstein8019]

No? “Conservative panel”=\= everyone is conservative. But destiny was up against 4 conservatives. Stop being so mad over a title

[@mr.dolphin8345]

@@ericstein8019 lol? Am I the mad one or are you?

[@vishg5148]

@@mr.dolphin8345 pretty sure it’s you bud

[@mr.dolphin8345]

@@vishg5148 I’m good I promise

[@ItsTornHD]

@@mr.dolphin8345 idk you sound pretty triggered