Sviatoslav Richter plays Chopin 1950 continuation

Sviatoslav Richter plays CHOPIN - early recordings - 19/06/1950 continuation
CHOPIN - early recordings - 19/06/1950, continuation of the concert
Prelude in e, Op.28/4
Prelude in D, Op.28/5
Prelude in A, Op.28/7
Prelude in f-sharp, Op.28/8
Prelude in b, Op.28/6
Prelude in E, Op.28/9
Prelude in c-sharp, Op.28/10
Prelude in B, Op.28/11
Prelude in E-flat, Op.28/19
Prelude in A-flat, Op.28/17
Prelude in F, Op.28/23 I
Prelude in d, Op.28/24 I
[Nocturne in F, Op.15/1
Mazurka in a, Op.17/4]

[@margaritafoncueva79]

Cuánta belleza ,! Mágico Richter... Gracias Yuriy .

[@miklosteleki7523]

Ok, but this is so beautiful! I think this “mistakes” are absolutly disinterested.

[@fa-la-mi-mi-re]

Many thanks again for this gem.now we heard Richter's voice too!

[@giorgio3245]

Thanks so much, Yuriy, expecially for the Mazurka encore, not appeared, so far, on any commercial recordings.

[@tonigasbarrini1120]

Ricordo dall'adolescenza.Grazie.

[@eytonshalomsandiego]

Que maravilloso!

[@paolofranceschi6874]

Oooooooooooh 😢😢😢

[@organman52]

Evidently, he did not notice the meter signature in the E minor Prelude. And he did not know about the 'dotted' rhythm in the E major. The '16th note' should LINE UP with the third of the triplets in the inner voices. If you don't believe me, LOOK AT THE AUTOGRAPH MANUSCRIPT.

[@fa-la-mi-mi-re]

But YOU did notice it.That does not lower his genius..I would say the opposite.So what?Richter is Richter.

[@organman52]

@@fa-la-mi-mi-re You can accept that 'Richter is Richter' and I do not. Is that okay with you?

[@fa-la-mi-mi-re]

@@organman52 I shall think about it.

[@CarldeFigueiredo-lf2gc]

Organman52: what a clever-clogs you are!