THIS Is How You Fix ALL Problems In Society

Watch the full Real Talk with Zuby podcast ft. Lila Rose here:
• Lila Rose - The Future...
Zuby and Lila Rose delve into the importance of connecting societal issues to their roots, particularly focusing on the decline of family values and the impact of straying from religious principles. They highlight the discomfort people feel in discussing these connections, fearing judgment or shame. However, they argue that many social problems, such as drug addiction, school shootings, and changing sexual norms, can be traced back to breakdowns in family structure and faith.
Lila shares her journey of rediscovering Christianity and its teachings on the value of all human life and the importance of family. They emphasize the positive influence of Christian values on Western civilization, including the promotion of equality and human rights. Despite acknowledging the flaws within Christian history, they advocate for a return to these foundational principles as a means to address contemporary societal challenges and promote individual and collective flourishing.
Follow Zuby:
/ zubymusic
/ zubymusic
/ zubymusic
Follow Lila Rose:
/ lilagracerose
Subscribe to the 'Real Talk With Zuby' podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify & more - fanlink.to/zubypodcast
Merch, Music & Books - teamzuby.com
Support Zuby on Patreon - / zubymusic
Support Zuby on Locals - teamzuby.locals.com
'Strong Advice: Zuby's Guide to Fitness For Everybody' eBook - gumroad.com/l/zubyfitness

[@bigglyguy8429]

You could fix all current problems by bringing back patriarchy. The father owns his children. It's really that simple; everything else flows from there. We've had decades of fighting AGAINST that, and now we're all standing around looking at the ruins, wondering what happened?

[@BlowitAllUp]

Not just the children but the wife.

[@bigglyguy8429]

@@BlowitAllUp If she wants to be husbanded by him (looked after), yes, but she should be free to leave him and his children...

[@BlowitAllUp]

@@bigglyguy8429 Only if she has good reason like proof of abuse. Otherwise she is abusing the children by leaving. Children in single father households do way better than single mother households but both parents are preferred.

[@MasterMalrubius]

Yo Zuby! Gettin' my Friday fix of mental stability.

[@ralphangel561]

Bring back the truth, bring back shame, discipline, chastisement, strictness, punishments, etc

[@144Donn]

In Thomas Cahill's book "The Gift of the Jews" he presses the point that it was Abraham's iconoclasm which broke the limitations of caste, history, family etc

[@mattp4845]

Great conversation. Thank you.

[@stevenkoehler6018]

I laud this young lady!

[@angryox3102]

I’m an atheist myself and even I recognize that religious based rules make for a better society. I honestly don’t even care what religion, there just needs to be a framework that keeps people in check.

[@sillygoose9070]

Define 'all problems in society'.

[@puresynergyflo]

Sin.

[@simonmcintosh6565]

Just make the list yourself. Zuby has made his list hundreds of times.

[@amazingbollweevil]

@@puresynergyflo Define "sin"

[@cryptojihadi265]

When you think being intentionally ignorant makes you look smart.

[@the_forbinproject2777]

ask google and you'll get about 24 items listed - your country may list more or less. Of that list several items could mean the same thing depending on what definitions you use/accept, for instance " Poverty" is listed , everyone is against poverty but what is poverty? is it absolute or does the it change with time and general wealth of what ever society you are talking about. Lets assume you mean a current society like the UK government, the European Union, and many other countries use 60 per cent of median income as their poverty threshold. So as the UK gets richer then likely that poverty can go up or down, in an absolute scale a richer UK should have less poverty and it does but the definition is a variable one so shows an increase ( More than 1 in 5 people in the UK (22%) were in poverty in 2021/22 - 14.4 million people. This included: 8.1 million (or around 2 in 10) working-age adults) . in absolute terms , well , compare the UK to , say , Chad.

[@amazingbollweevil]

You know who has a lot of religious faith and strong family ties? A HUGE number of nations that are very poor and/or in turmoil. At the same time, the most secular countries are very successful. Zuby just hasn't been able to connect the dots. Huh.

[@ErockAlliance]

It’s not the either or. How do we take what’s working and what’s not and move forward

[@amazingbollweevil]

@@ErockAlliance How about we first recognize that it's not religion that makes successful secular societies so successful? If you think adding religion will make it more successful, you may just as well test how adding Zydeco music will make them more successful. What we also recognize is that highly religious countries are not particularly successful. Gee, I wonder what could be the common denominator?

[@user-gl8tj3wg4o]

Hey I'm just curious if you could possibly help me with investing in crypto I am a beginner

[@ThrasherComaco]

There are alot of investing opinions (real estate, stock, gold, silver and cryptocurrency)

[@ericstephanie6351]

Actually I've lost so much trying to trade on my own, looking for professional to start my trade with.

[@user-kc8pm7xh4z]

Most times you don't just start trading on your own, sorry for your loss, I will advise you to get a professional in this.

[@user-jp1xd8gg8c]

How can someone know a professional trader when legit once are verv hard to find

[@user-xk4fl2kx1k]

I will advise you stop trading on your own if you keep losing. I don't trades on my own anymore,l always required help and assistance.

[@jkbrown5496]

"Christianity, as a late writer has pointed out in words well chosen,* is the only system of socialism which commends it self as having a rational basis, and its founder the most practical teacher of it that the world has ever seen. " The aim of all socialism is the securing of equality in the social condition of mankind, and if equality is to be secured at all it will be secured only by changing the hearts of men, and never by setting to work, in the first instance, upon the conditions." But the present impulse of socialism is not Christian, but rather one willing to put an end to Christianity. And it is a system of machinery, like the kingdom of a tyrant, not of souls, like that of Christ. Now the Christian system did not rest on force at all. It was communistic, but not socialistic, as the word is properly used; for its very essence was the freedom of the individual will. " * Socialism and Legislation, Westminster Review, January, 1886

[@Dragblacker]

Modern socialism has always been a corruption of Christianity. Erik von Kuehnelt also discussed this.

[@TimBitts649]

100% wonderful conversation. My take: Humans are very family oriented. Tribal too. My guess as to one of our real problems and real solution, besides the big problem, which is lack of faith: Family has been replaced by big government. Since women voted, the size of gov't has grown and grown and grown. Same in all countries: women vote for big gov't to give them more of what they want. You see this particularly in the black American family. Thomas Sowell has talked about this. He says in the 1960s black American families had a 20% fatherless rate, which is lower than the current white fatherless rate. And today he says it's nearing 80%. All due to gov't incentives brought on by Lyndon Johnson, in an effort to get the black American vote. Historically said Sowell, from the time of Lincoln black Americans had voted for Republicans, out of gratitude to Lincoln. Then a profound shift happened under Johnson, who offered "The Great Society" which were cash and incentives by Democrats. This was really an early version of Woke, which had the government start to replace black men in the home, by incentivizing the women with cash prizes. Then the huge policy mistake was made of giving government money to black unmarried women. This incentivized black women to make poor choices in men. I think that is what drove the black fatherless rate from 20 to 80%....with all it's attendant social problems. And the black vote in America went from almost entirely Republican, to almost entirely Democrat. Years ago I saw Dr. Warren Farrell in an interview, explaining how most of the government programs and help for black Americans, ended up going almost exclusively to black women, most of them single. I was watching Dr. David Buss being interviewed by Dr. Jordan Peterson. Dr. Buss is one of the world's leading human mating specialist. They talked about how females pick men. Basically females are looking for competent men, who can give them protection and resources to enable women to have stable families if they chose to have children. What the Johnson Big Government policy did was effectively in the mind of black women, it replaced the black man in the American home. Black men were replaced by Big Government. But wasn't the problem all about racism? Sure to some degree, there was way more racism in the 1960s, I was around back then. But Democrats to their credit, were the driving force to socially stigmatize racism, so it's still around, but no longer socially respectable for most people.....But isn't racism still the fundamental problem in America? I don't think so. Here's why I don't believe that: When I was at university in the 1970s, I was at the library, I picked up an official American gov't book of statistics: "A Statistical Abstract of the United States". I had a lot of Chinese and a few Japanese friends at the time, I was a typical social liberal: I believed racism held people back. The problem was, the non-white people I knew, Chinese and Japanese, were all doing well. Plus the statistics in the Abstract said that even back then, for income, even in the 1970s Asian Americans were outcompeting white Americans on income. How could that be, if racism always held people back? (Seattle computer programmer Arthur Hu kept track of those statistics for Asian Americans for decades, he's passed away, but had a website with stats long ago called Asian American Index of Diversity.....all sorts of stats about Asian Americans outcompeting white Americans. Arthur also did not believe the standard narrative on race in America) Fast forward a few decades: now Americans from India have family incomes higher than white Americans. Double the white family income. And Chinese and Japanese and Korean Americans continue to outperform whites, despite America being according to the political left, such a problem as to hold people back. I was starting to question the beliefs I grew up with. Then recently another shoe dropped: It turned out, American immigrants from Africa, particularly Nigeria, were doing extremely well in America. But how could that be? I had read the book Roots by Alex Haley when it came out in the 1970s, I knew a bit of the history of slavery. I knew that American black slaves mostly came from the area now known as Nigeria. So American black people were ethnically Nigerian, based on their historic ancestry. So why did native American blacks not do as well as Nigerian blacks? The Nigerians came over, with an intact culture, with dads in the home. That's all it was. Dads in the home for all races? The kids do well, for all races. Yes, the Japanese, Chinese kids I went to school with, came from strong families, that had dads in the home, stressed education. This meant despite lots of racism being around in the 1970s, the kids still succeeded in life....same pattern as the Nigerian immigrants and the Indian immigrants, who showed up much later in the picture. There really were little to no Nigerian and Indian immigrants in the 1970s.....they showed up much later. Final puzzle piece to my views on a solution: I was watching Glenn Greenwald video, "2nd Gentleman to WEF" At 11 minutes in, Glenn has a graph on: Top American religions for income. It's now a neck and neck race, between Hinduism and Judaism, for the wealthiest American sub-groups, based on income. I've known a bit about Jewish Americans, had worked with lots of Indian Americans, had many friends. Both groups tend to be clannish, often buy business and often buy property together, as a clan. And Jewish Americans and Indian Americans are succeeding wildly in America, based on essentially a clannish social culture....much like a tribe. Humans of all sorts evolved for tribal interdependence at a local level. Family is important, but imo so is "tribe"....extended local family. The European equivalent was village. More or less, same thing functionally, as a tribe. And in our political history, Americans have first replaced dads in black homes, (big mistake) replaced the dad and the tribe with Big Government. (Big, Big Mistake). We have to be very, very careful about what we do with government. Even with good intentions, it's easy to destroy the family, with Big Government. Since women evolved relying on men, effectively Big Government acts in a woman's mind, to replace her natural husband. The government in America became effectively a Substitute Husband. And since the government has a billion times more power and resources than a local man, women tend to pick the government, over a local man, because she can. So: We need to incentivize local policing, women relying on men, everyone relying on local kin. This means incentivizing marriage and family and kin and tribe formation, financially incentivizing it....while economically punishing people who remain single and have children. We've done away with the natural order that works, based on God and faith and family. Lila's comment's are very astute and wise. Religion in the past, had reasons for the patterns it pushed, socially, as you explained very well. 100% agree with your comments on religion. Great connection of dots. Also Lila Rose, great comments. 100% agree. I've read author Rodney Stark. Great author.

[@jefffinkbonner9551]

You’re pretty much dead on the money. But we need to add in the sexual revolution and the “Blacksploitation” social engineering push in the 70s. That pushed the whole “pimp” image as being the ultimately successful black man: lots of money, women (hoes,) drugs, and material bling. And yes you’re so right about the low black fatherless rate up to the mid 60s. It’s good that segregation and Jim Crow were repealed with the Civil Rights Act, but it is true that black America h strong communities and alternate economies that served them and helped them even thrive. My white ancestors did similar in that neighbors and church parishioners looked out for one another, especially through times like the Depression. They “thrived” even if they were materially and financially destitute because they had each other and had belonging and a loving God in heaven who was leading them home to His Kingdom. Today, we need to get back to that.

[@the_forbinproject2777]

Hello Zuby , I posted this as an answer to one of your commnetators but beleive it should be a post of its own;- Problems in society ask google and you'll get about 24 items listed - your country may list more or less. Of that list several items could mean the same thing depending on what definitions you use/accept, for instance " Poverty" is listed , everyone is against poverty but what is poverty? is it absolute or does the it change with time and general wealth of what ever society you are talking about. Lets assume you mean a current society like the UK government, the European Union, and many other countries use 60 per cent of median income as their poverty threshold. So as the UK gets richer then likely that poverty can go up or down, in an absolute scale a richer UK should have less poverty and it does but the definition is a variable one so shows an increase ( More than 1 in 5 people in the UK (22%) were in poverty in 2021/22 - 14.4 million people. This included: 8.1 million (or around 2 in 10) working-age adults) . in absolute terms , well , compare the UK to , say , Chad?

[@newbee2262]

Bring back faith in Christ and practice it

[@FlorinG.]

So submitting to imaginary supreme despots found in troubled books of mythology is the answer. 🤦‍♂️ Look how well the Arab world is doing with that. 🥶

[@hospitalsgivingpatientsdan8894]

WE MOVED AWAY FROM JESUS WE PAYING FOR IT ❤

[@TOM-C.]

Greed is the cause of all our ills. Get rid of greed, and we will flourish! 👍😎✌🗽

[@simonmcintosh6565]

Get rid?? Ok dude so what system doesn’t run on greed and when hasn’t there been greed? This utopia is not real and it’s actually not what was needed to make society better anyway.

[@leonari]

No it’s envy

[@asagk]

I'm not a Christian, so I tried Googling where 'Yeshua' actually condemned abortion in the New Testament, but couldn't find a source for it. What exactly is she refering at 4:30 "...rejection of abortion...'? Or am I misunderstanding the context and she is not saying that 'Yeshua' rejects abortion, but that Christians are interpreting it just that way for themselves? What am I missing? --- By the way: In Massechet Yewamot (Talmud) says that a fertilized egg cell is “mere water” and can only considered life from the 40th day. The more controversial part might be that, while life is generally considered sacred, there is the exception of a pregnancy that endangers the health or dignity of the mother in one of various ways.

[@bobprivate8575]

...I wonder if it's coincidence that around 40 days is also the point at which she's missed two periods in a row. Or if it's the point in a society without pregnancy tests, it's when she "knows" she's pregnant?

[@asagk]

@@bobprivate8575 Sounds reasonable, because this interpretation was made long before modern pregnancy tests were available. The absence of at least the next period for some time could be safe as an indicator for interpreting the “circumstance” as pregnancy. Do not forget that the female fertility cycle can vary and be delayed due to circumstances such as malnutrition, stress and the like.

[@evilblackcat6357]

We lost moral structure. Why it _has_ to be tied to any one particular religion is nonsense.

[@Scorpinox89]

Not nonsense,actually. Morals originate from The Holy Bible and nothing here on Earth can prove a claim earlier than The Holy Bible.....we get our moral foundation from Jesus Christ of Nazareth,Son of God and he who died for our sins.

[@evilblackcat6357]

@@Scorpinox89 Moral behavior existed prior to any religion, yours included. To claim it didn't exist until your religion created it and monopolized it is sheer hubris.

[@reinedire7872]

​@@evilblackcat6357 No one is claiming that some form of morality didn't exist prior. But Christianity refined it to the point at which it created the foundation of Western civilization, as was clearly explained in this vid. To deny that is to deny truth. The sad truth is that most people who reject it do so, not for intellectual reasons as they claim, but rather because they want to bang whoever they want to bang whenever they want to bang them without shame or consequence. Admittedly, this is a bit of an oversimplified assessment on my part for the purpose of brevity in an often long-winded comments section but, generally speaking, people just want to worship their genitals.

[@Smartcom5]

@@Scorpinox89 I'd say we surely didn't got our moral foundation from the Bible or Jesus Christ of Nazareth, Our Lord and Saviour, but GOD Almighty, The Creator of All Things. It's given to us internally, inspired by GOD when HE made us to his image, and no-one can dispute that. Though I see your point, we're in the same lane. Oh, and just so you know, *_Christ_*_ is King!_

[@evilblackcat6357]

@@Smartcom5 I'm disputing it.

[@kariookami]

Wonderful conversation. This young lady may want to open up the Old Testament at least once before she continues saying that the ideas she espoused arose only upon the advent of the teachings of Jesus.

[@Smartcom5]

Stop calling them ladies for God's sake, they ain't! Nobody calls men gentlemen anymore, even if well-deserved anyway. _Or do they?_ Stop putting them on a pedestal! This glorification is the root of all evil and it must end for a (fresh, new) start!

[@spicole2937]

Then women take on equal responibility lol

[@user-uc8jo4nq1p]

God is dead

[@AX-fx7ng]

Truth, requires inquiry. Jesus learnt his stuff from India - 12 years.