The final result must be negative Cuz block b going upward Anyway It was a clear explanation Thx …
@franks162319 күн бұрын
i dont get it doesnt that car want to slip downwards? so shouldnt the friction be going up?
@ramialchafi541928 күн бұрын
where did the 32.2 come from?
@shesanobody27 күн бұрын
gravity
@bilkisuuuuuuuАй бұрын
Hello, why was the value of theta substituted in Fsin theta and not F=60.6/cos theta?
@polymupАй бұрын
you cant even talk i cant stand with 2x, not enough
@o203xАй бұрын
Is this the same method of force and acceleration method?
@nurlubirsey5014Ай бұрын
Thank youuuuuuuu
@aidanwaldron3501Ай бұрын
What is the reasoning for using the 60 degrees instead of 30 degrees for the force of 250 N?
@cyrilsuzzettetimosa2551Ай бұрын
Why is that summation of moments about A is Cy(6) -450(3.46)=0 Why its -450 and not positive 450 when the arrow is pointing to the right, and its positive
@MemoonaZainab-x1rАй бұрын
Finally found someone who explains it easi
@pestifygaminghacks47132 ай бұрын
good day sir! i would like to ask why did you not decompose the weight into it's x and y components? is there no such need?
@waleed95082 ай бұрын
broooo thank you so much for you work you are helping me alot during my studying god bless your efforts and please continue this
@AGBWBREH2 ай бұрын
How is Ax a positive value when it's facing in the negative direction?
@khiziiikhan2 ай бұрын
What if we take the datum down
@whoistshepii2 ай бұрын
Why doesn't the 600N force create a moment around the x-axis??
@alexheinrich2462 ай бұрын
God of war analogy is so real
@elizaflores22602 ай бұрын
im really having fun watching every video and learning about statics at the same time 😂 i love your goofiness haha
@CharlesThompson-s6l3 ай бұрын
Useful insights, nice method. Thanks
@CharlesThompson-s6l3 ай бұрын
Helpful explanation. Many thanks!
@theengineeringcrucible34902 ай бұрын
Glad it helped!
@CharlesThompson-s6l3 ай бұрын
Thanks for the great FBD and explanation
@CharlesThompson-s6l3 ай бұрын
Great FBDs. Thanks very much for your clear explanations.
@tote41622923 ай бұрын
Hello, I was wondering if you, by any chance, could cover chapter 3 of hibbeler?
@thegreatest11763 ай бұрын
shouldnt we take in to accoun the u axis? what are they trying to achieve by placing the U axis??
@KingsMan_ib3 ай бұрын
hello, i have a question i tried using the left side but my answer was (12-4(6x))
@sarahdonnelly52363 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@fortunatenkuthalo4 ай бұрын
Thanks
@fortunatenkuthalo4 ай бұрын
Helpful, thanks
@iboohvlogs68864 ай бұрын
Hello I have a question, how do you know which direction u are to put positive or negative on ?
@thegreatest11763 ай бұрын
its assumed that up and to the right is always positive.
@Noor-us9rk4 ай бұрын
Even arabs appreciates your work, shukran❤
@cosmoenthoven41934 ай бұрын
Oh great heavens, what is going on here
@hampopo14305 ай бұрын
감사합니다
@hampopo14305 ай бұрын
감사합니다
@NiazuddinFaiz5 ай бұрын
Thanks
@kevincamarillo24295 ай бұрын
the algebra doesnt make sense for teh quadratic equation s^2: -100 s: 100-49.05 = 50.95 constant: 125-60+36+29.43 = 130.43 tell me if im wrong please
@FIRDAUSAKBARSHARULLAIL5 ай бұрын
Hi mr, i need your help to teach me dynamics
@abdullahelgamal97596 ай бұрын
Its + cos(30) not -sin(30) because its on a decline so when we resolve the wight its going to be to the right and down we need the force to the right cause its gonna push with the force so +10x9.81cos(30)(S-0.6) the rest is correct
@Shamano372 ай бұрын
Incorrect, gravity acts in the Y direction, so we need to use sin to find the force in the Y.
@KunalKumar-um1df6 ай бұрын
From India
@nothinnew166 ай бұрын
Thanks
@Roro-t2i6 ай бұрын
⭐️⭐️⭐️
@ShreyaChopra-zi7dz7 ай бұрын
I love this guy
@lesleymurugesu90967 ай бұрын
its hard for me to follow if you fill in the variables at the end. It resolves in a long sentence of variables wich makes he dizzy in a kind of way, haha. maybe you can fill in the variables sooner. that way you dont get the T = m*ax+m*g*sin30+uk*mg*cos 30. I have to read it ten times to understand (13:37) But above all, thanssk for the explanation :)
@theengineeringcrucible34902 ай бұрын
Try to get used to entering numbers at the end. This will help you out in the long run. Many terms will simplify/cancel out in your future physics/engineering classes
@Sandy-zq3ez2 ай бұрын
I agree
@AhmedHessein-jv5uk7 ай бұрын
Dude tomorrow is my final and I’ve been watching your videos since the semester started and it helped me a lot so thank you so much and may god bless you ❤️❤️
@truesonsilo22647 ай бұрын
tnx man
@usmanmehmood70777 ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ thank you so much
@Juantodd997 ай бұрын
Nice job with the derivation, as i could follow along. Instead of integrating, could you have substituted acceleration using the kinematic eqn for acceleration V^2=V0^2+2as?
@jesseyahrenholtz53447 ай бұрын
Can someone explain why weight isn't accounted for in this problem?
@theengineeringcrucible34907 ай бұрын
We are solving for forces in the x-plane (horizontal plane) as the problem states. Weight is only acting in the vertical/y-plane. Hope that clears it up!
@Infynte-k9y8 ай бұрын
I thought since the plane the block is sliding is smooth therefore, there is no friction. So then why are we figuring out T_1 if it is supposed to be 0?
@z4rff145Ай бұрын
T1 no puede ser cero porque ya viene con una velocidad, T2 es 0 porque frena y no existe movimiento, sorry 6 month later
@NaomyCiomaraCaetanoDaSilva8 ай бұрын
thank you for tis video, very helpful!
@luisjuliemaeg.44028 ай бұрын
Why is the at= 6?
@Dolphmaster7 ай бұрын
Tangential acceleration is the acceleration that causes change in speed