Did god make us to worship him. More clicks is that what god wants ? I don't worship anyone or thing.
@GoHawks-v6dСағат бұрын
Guy’s a dill.
@lucmalafarina1807Сағат бұрын
If one wants to see what living in a gray zone means, and never really commit or say things clearly as a christian, just listen to N.T. Wright, he's part of the scholars who, instead of presenting Jesus' teachings in a way that is simple but clear, clear in a way that puts you before a real choice, the kind that compels you to change your mind and behavior, dilutes the radicalness of Jesus' teachings, to a point where being christian is "preferable", but no necessarily the only way to salvation because only God sees the heart. I have come to see how N.T. Wright is so careful as to make sure his words won't offend or exclude the listener, that he forgot how to present the Gospel. Very sad. I would even go as far as saying that he's become uncomfortable with the NT radical nature.
@Gladfulspirit2 сағат бұрын
Ben was discourteous and talked in circles like he was afraid. He assumes that being atheist is equivalent to living a hopeless existences. This is not necessarily true for others.
@DrDemolition972 сағат бұрын
I find it wildly disingenuous at the roughly 1:07:00 mark when JW says "God is RESTRAINING their evil" when he knows his own theology professes God is directly *causing* the very same evil he is now restraining.
@DIBBY402 сағат бұрын
It's interesting that in a Christian discussion of free will that Christians will, in all probability, come from a Christian Country. In Riyadh they won't be discussing this. So how free are we really?
@pdyt20092 сағат бұрын
The most recent intentional Theocracy was South Africa - the one with Apartheid! It was based on Dutch Reform theology, and it failed! I look for the day when there will be a Theocracy, that of Jesus Christ. Until then I will fight for and support Western Liberal Socialist Democracy as exemplified by most of Europe, one in which the rights of all people are protected, religion is not imposed, and religion (or non religion) is protected. Freedom of speech and freedom of expression. And so I will not support any state attempt to impose the Bible - as interpreted by a select group of Bibliocrats - on the people.
@Elias.Barney3 сағат бұрын
Justin should shut his mouth and listen to his elder. His arrogance is infuriating.
@SVisionary3 сағат бұрын
Ben Shapiro... DESTROYS... . Jokes aside. Fun conversation as always. Strengthened my faith. Enjoy Alex's good and honest efforts instead of being a rude and disgusted attacker.
@vivekraghuram24594 сағат бұрын
To address Alex’s point about certain ‘immoral’ things being allowed by God, one might be tempted to give the scriptural example of Sodom where God acceded to Abraham’s request to spare the city for the sake of ten good people. A strictly moral God would have punished the remaining immoral people and saved the ten good ones, right? But He ultimately destroys the city because not even ten could be found. Forgiveness for human weakness is a part of God’s nature otherwise the only thing left would be complete dissolution of the world. In this sense, a religious society is necessary because it accommodates human weakness under the hope that we might be able to improve one day. A truly secular society cannot tolerate what it considers immoral. A look at communist countries tells us all we need to know on that front. Can a truly secular person condone an act of immorality? What basis do they have for doing so if they don’t believe that God ultimately judges, not humans?
@crunchybroll47314 сағат бұрын
Is this a reupload?
@HannesBarties-h9e4 сағат бұрын
Christianity is better becuase it calls to love. As a fundamental requirement. Not love as we know it, but Corinthians 13 love. There's no possible atheistic argument to be made which will have a better effect on society as a whole than this.
@samanthathompson98124 сағат бұрын
Sex is about bodies. It just is, a bodily state. We can wish things were other than they are, but they aren't.
@fizz034 сағат бұрын
"The beauty of religion is that there are a bunch of things I can't explain", meanwhile he uses the fact that science can't explain everything as a genuine argument...
@Agitated_Hamster5 сағат бұрын
The Bible says that the Throne of God is right above Polaris sitting on top of the 2nd molten crystal Firmament. The aurora is the emerald rainbow surrounding his throne. If you have Scientific world view you will never believe it, but that's what the Bible says. What NT Wright doesn't understand is that there is already a dome house (tabernacle) in heaven, multiple people in the Bible speak about it and even Enoch speaks about it in detail. The things Moses made were reflections of the things in heaven, the Ark for example...there is one in heave, his throne, and one on earth. It says that God the Father made darkness his dwelling place, because his house is surrounded by the dark waters above. Every single vision in the bible talks about the same location. We that grew up indoctrinated with the scientific world view have a hard time understanding and believing it but the people during the old times didn't have a scientific world view. They believed what God told them. God is going to remake the world, and our afterlife will be here on Earth. We are not going anywhere after we die. God will destroy the firmament and heaven and earth will unify in one space.
@Dionysus38836 сағат бұрын
It’s incredible how much ego influences the mental gymnastics that people go through trying to reconcile a concept like free will.
@ByThePond8 сағат бұрын
Fooled into thinking I had privacy
@roberthoyle19719 сағат бұрын
Very unsatisfying answer on free will and suffering by the professor....might as well say GOD WORKS IN MYSTERIOUS WAYS ...which is what he kinda says.
@paramedicchrisbookseries9 сағат бұрын
Tom is a very wise man.
@anderschristoffersrensen17449 сағат бұрын
That depends(On which religion exactly.). But nobody knows which religion is best, and which is worst. That`s why religion is a mess. But at least religion, dosen`t break people`s minds just for fun.
@anderschristoffersrensen17449 сағат бұрын
I know who, I want to be in control. Because at least, he wouldn`t break people`s minds just for fun.
@pradiptamandal776210 сағат бұрын
57:20 He knew exactly what he was doing 😄
@bender243010 сағат бұрын
Alex should have asked Ben to prove that Judaism is best for society
@litjellyfish11 сағат бұрын
I still don't get people who see good and evil as some "rules made by some outer mind" when history shows so clearly that what is considered good and bad has changed many times over the course of time. And also is so different just depending on age, culture etc even on a personal level. Which this debade puts spotlight on. Also I dont get how people who believe in god / free will think that aethists dont think people can change. Of course you can yourself affect how you change, but in the end its a neurological physical process.
@Malblas12 сағат бұрын
LOVE IT
@lawrie11813 сағат бұрын
Q; why do we call Jesus a Palestinian Jew if Palestine was not created by Hadrian until AD132 ??? Thanks
@lawrie11813 сағат бұрын
Q; why do we call Jesus a Palestinian Jew if Palestine was not created by Hadrian until AD132 ??? Thanks
@tadm12313 сағат бұрын
What an absolute clown this dude AC Grayling is.
@Lilac91416 сағат бұрын
Why do all British young women sound like Emma Watson?
@DonnaFlores-m7f18 сағат бұрын
History records Jesus and the New Testament is proven as one of antiquity’s authentic pieces of literature by far
@DonnaFlores-m7f18 сағат бұрын
A double minded man is unstable in all of his ways
@DonnaFlores-m7f18 сағат бұрын
The man in white sounds like a pagan
@jasonbright629418 сағат бұрын
The entire premise of this question was flawed from the beginning. "Is religion good for society?" Which one? In some world views they live their their neighbors and in others they eat them. These things are not equivalent.
@andreastarks278019 сағат бұрын
The United States does not have a constitutional separation of church and state. It has a constitutional protection from the state to practice religious freedoms
@slimdusty632816 сағат бұрын
which also serves to support the practice of blatant religious tyranny. Especially often when children are involved, or whenever cult abuses are occurring
@pdyt20092 сағат бұрын
First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;... It has both a Constitutional guarantee that the state shall not establish any religion, and that it shall not prohibit any religion. So freedom of religion and freedom from enforced religion. You can't claim the one without the other.
@slimdusty63282 сағат бұрын
@@pdyt2009 it doesn't protect against enforced religion though. There is no freedom from enforced religion for children being born into abusive cults and groups with faith beliefs that use methods to enforce religious beliefs onto people born into their families. This is how the constitution serves to protect religious tyranny. Which in turn inadvertently serves to help to provide growth in social dysfunction. Growth in C-PTSD which in the long term relates to alcohol and drug addictions, anger , homelessness and so forth. People who'd escape from those cults end up having their own children who'll be steeped in problems related to intergenerational trauma, who'll then proceed to carry that social dysfunction forward within intergenerational outcomes. So in this sense, everyone still ends up paying for "the results" of it . Its the karma of the results of a system that's long been failing
@pauperdiamond873319 сағат бұрын
*Everything* is caught in the web of cause and effect, including what you think and do. If free will exists, only God has it. In fact, that might be what makes God God.
@downenout870522 сағат бұрын
This channel is a joke, so many comments only become visible by changing how comments are sorted.
@byrondickens22 сағат бұрын
@@downenout8705 KZbin be like that, yo. They are completely arbitrary, capricious and opaque in everything they do. It's not the fault of this channel.
@downenout870522 сағат бұрын
@byrondickens Not entirely correct, the content creator can block key words and phrases. Given the volume and nature of what is being hidden, I doubt this is entirely down to the incomprehensible whims of the algorithms.
@byrondickens16 сағат бұрын
@downenout8705 True. Given the sorts of comments on both sides that serve no purpose other than dogmatic polemics which contribute nothing to the discussion, one can hardly blame them.
@slimdusty632816 сағат бұрын
well its kind of in keeping with Christian long standing traditions of censorship, and what have you. Heretics had used to be tortured or burned, or perhaps both. So some progress has been made. Maybe most people wouldn't even been allowed to read the bible either, at one time. So perhaps we shouldn't have any good reason to expect things to be completely open and upfront, even today?. Christians can be kind of shameless too, being as they'll still happily support situations of blatant religious tyranny, within cults or due to luck of who children are being born to, under clause of so called religious liberty, which also served to inadvertently help to uphold religious tyranny. Most Christian wont bother to lose any of their own sleep over such trivial matters
@slimdusty632815 сағат бұрын
@@byrondickens what i admire the most about youtube channels run by biblical scholars and/or atheists is the way they'll never ever desire to censor peoples comments, unless they'd be absolutely abusive This, in my view, is the sign of people who'd GENUNELY be interested in seeking the truth As an agnostic, i see it as a real turn off, whenever i note the regularity of censorship of comments by people associated to Christendom. Its really no great wonder either that Christendom has undergone such a disgraceful level of historic sex abuse. It was something bound to happen when censorship has long been so commonplace?
@alangiaconelli291923 сағат бұрын
What is wrong about using our word of our culture about what we view something is. I think Hell is a good word to use to describe what we want to avoid. Go ahead and soften it up with other words we don’t understand and maybe I will think it is ok to go there.
@TimothyBeirneSoftwareDeveloper23 сағат бұрын
From a 11/22/2014 Facebook post by Dr. Michael Brown One of my favorite Spurgeon quotes on Israel: "I think we do not attach sufficient importance to the restoration of the Jews. We do not think enough about it. But certainly, if there is anything promised in the Bible it is this. I imagine that you cannot read the Bible without seeing clearly that there is to be an actual restoration of the Children of Israel . . . For when the Jews are restored, the fullness of the Gentiles shall be gathered in; and as soon as they return, then Jesus will come upon Mount Zion with his ancients gloriously, and the halcyon days of the millennium shall then dawn; we shall then know every man to be a brother and a friend; Christ shall rule with universal sway." And then one from D. M. Lloyd-Jones: "It is remarkable that, although they (the Jews) were without their country for so many centuries, and nations did their utmost to destroy them completely, this nation has been preserved. The only real explanation of this is that God has not finished with them and that there is a day coming when this 'fullness of Israel' is going to be brought back to salvation, back into the Christian church, and so God's ultimate promise to Abraham is going to receive a wonderful fulfillment."
@tedclemens4093Күн бұрын
We might consider evil in context to the love God and love your neighbor commandments. Unlike the other regulations of law, love-if it's to be sincere at all-can't be simply commanded. So a Creator God would defeat enemies, heal disability, raise the dead and command nature-and did-with many genuinely loving him with "all their mind, soul and strength" as a result. What God could not do by the same authority is make us love our neighbor-at least not without undoing the integrity of his intended image and likeness. The command to "love your neighbor as yourself" would need to be handled in a totally different way.
@clovislyme6195Күн бұрын
One listens to Godly people, sincere, humble, faithful, doing their best to explain evil to us (as best they can, and they recognise that their answers are imperfect), and one is comforted, carried along with the narrative. Then next day an innocent child is tortured to death by some depraved human, and the comfort melts away like snow in sun. Blessed are you whose theodicy carries your faith safe to the other side of such events.
@sensereference2227Күн бұрын
Who is really blessed though? The one who is truly empathetic and can't rationalize away the horrific act or the one who can sincerely say, "in the grand scheme of things it's no big deal" and still be comforted by the theodicy?
@clovislyme6195Күн бұрын
@@sensereference2227 Honestly, I don't know. I do know that, just for myself, such horrors have become an insuperable obstacle to genuine belief in a loving God, and therefore (I sadly and fearfully admit), to Grace - whatever that might be. I do not say this with a shred of pride. I find atheism trite and disagreeable, and I wish believers well. Maybe they are, incomprehensibly, correct.
@Truth_Truth_Truth17 сағат бұрын
That's interesting. For me, horrible acts of evil (and evil in general, for that matter) are only intelligible because of God's existence, not despite it. I think the only logical conclusion for a child being tortured is, for an atheist, "I feel really bad about this. I wonder why." For a theist - particularly a Christian, it's, "I feel really bad about this. I keenly recognize that the perpetrator falls horrifically short of the full nature he was undeniably created for, the perfect standard that is God." God is the reason I feel bad about it, and He is the reason there will be ultimate justice in the form of a price being paid (whether the torturer allows Christ to pay the price, or pays for it himself...).
@sensereference222717 сағат бұрын
@@Truth_Truth_Truth The atheist feels compassion and empathy for other living beings. They have brain structures like mirror neurons that are responsible for this. Brain scans of psychopaths who don't feel compassion or empathy reveal that these structures are smaller or less active in them. Even non-human animals like chimpanzees feel empathy to a degree for their own kind and have been known on some occasions to even help humans in danger because chimpanzees also have mirror neurons. The G-d hypothesis doesn't account for why non-human animals also display empathy and even a sense of justice in some instances.
@clovislyme619514 сағат бұрын
@@Truth_Truth_Truth I can understand that reasoning, and I am glad, genuinely glad, that it provides for you and so many others a fortress against disbelief in the goodness of God. The world needs robust Christians. For myself, I hear the teaching that God is outside time, and that a thousand years is a moment to him - but then I recall that, to the tortured child a moment of that torture is thousand years, and no help comes (even from the God who is the ground of all being), and the theodicy s/he does not even know brings no relief from the agony. All this must be, for some hidden reason, which we must accept as a matter of faith, acceptable to Him, for He does not end it immediately, even though, in his omnipotence, He could. And there will be other such children today and tomorrow, and tomorrow, and 2,000 years ago Jesus promised soon to return to end such things, yet He has not, and the world grows ever worse.
@RobertEgbersКүн бұрын
Harris v Peterson 2.0
@BrocLarterКүн бұрын
Very few atheists that I know, are 100% resolute in their position that there is no possibility of something in the universe that might be classified as a "god." What they are steadfast in, however, is the very provable position that all the religions of the world are made up. Having an atheist debate some abstract idea of theism, is way too big of a hill for an atheist to climb. At the end of the day, no one really knows.
@g4p5l6Күн бұрын
Thanks for posting.
@sensereference2227Күн бұрын
There is no "problem of good" for atheists because the atheist does not believe that the universe is the product of a deity with a certain moral character. So, things we label as "good" can happen just as things that we "label" as evil can happen because the universe is mindless and indifferent. Even a theist that believes in a morally neutral creator doesn't have a problem of good or a problem of evil because there is no contradiction in that creator allowing some mixture of evil and good. There is only an issue when one posits that there is some omnipotent creator deity that is "all-good" or "all-evil" because we wouldn't expect to see instances of evil in the former case or instances of good in the latter case.
@rikconant1228Күн бұрын
I notice that the bishop retreats to this position that God is just unknowable when forced to justify the problems of suffering or hiddeness, but he certainly seems to be confident in the truthfulness of less troublesome propositions about God, like that he is good and sufficinetly the prime mover. This comes off as intellectually insincere and just a case of cherry picking.
@eak7301Күн бұрын
Fact: God does evil and uses suffering as part of his grand design for the common good. Rom 8:20. For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it (God), in hope.
@sensereference222721 сағат бұрын
Fact: using evil and suffering as a means to achieve some common good when other alternatives that don't entail that evil and suffering are available to achieve that same good is morally indefensible. Any deity that is truly omnipotent has a nearly infinite number of ways to achieve some outcome because they are not constrained by anything, otherwise they wouldn't be omnipotent. Furthermore, under some moral systems, using evil and suffering as means to achieve the common good is morally indefensible even if that is the only way to achieve that good, such as brutally sacrificing an innocent child at the end of each month to please a King who would bring down his wrath on the community if the community did not routinely do this.
@seanpierce938620 сағат бұрын
In hope for what? Only a select few will see the New Earth. The rest are to suffer eternally. Do you think that’s a reasonable price to pay for the “common good”? I mean, that’s a line that villains use. Let’s say you have a non-Christian friend. Insert a real person here if it’s helpful. Would you rather: a. You and your friend are born into paradise under the restriction that you can never do evil, or b. You get sent to the afterlife and your friend suffers forever. Even if there’s a mild disadvantage to the situation in (a) that’s a pretty obvious choice. Otherwise, your own happiness would outweigh your concern for your friend. Now, isn’t God supposed to care about even the one lost sheep?
@loridyson569Күн бұрын
Not a snake, but a serpent. Your words use to be important to you, to be correct to the bible. Last year or 2 you keep misspeaking. This worries me because some are minor but a few were major mistakes. May want to see a doctor while it may be a easy fix rather than later having permanent damage. Please & God Bless.
@sixfootoneistall2002Күн бұрын
serpent and snake are the same thing. This is like saying “not a triangle, a three sided shape.”
@loridyson569Күн бұрын
@sixfootoneistall2002 Back in those times a serpent would be more like a lizard, saying in the reptile family. God punished the serpent by making it crawl on it's stomach in the dust like a snake.
@meteor1237Күн бұрын
Refer to the book “Determined”. There really is no free will.
@gorger13Күн бұрын
Ben wins in the words per minute spoken.
@CRWengerКүн бұрын
What a load of tosh. At least Wright didn't resort this time to quoting the great Christian prophet CS Lewis. The very first question he should have been pitched before being tossed all those softballs is why should we assume we have Free Will in what appears to be a deterministic universe? As for America, Christians have been running the country for all of my life and they've been doing it badly. Yes, America is a wealthy nation but compared to the more secular western European nations the standard of living is substantially lower. Let's not forget that Christians and the Church just elected to office a serial sexual predator and convicted felon to arguably the most powerful office in the world. Your prayers were answered Wright.