Thank you for using the correct, standard nomenclature for the alternator parts. Nice simple description of alternator FUNCTION.

Like a jet engine

Excellent, you avoided the common textbook-misconceptions! Upvoted!. The main misconception is apparently due to Prandtl, who described these vortices as perfectly horizontal (see the Prandtl Horseshoe in his early 1920s papers.) Yet if the Prandtl Horseshoe actually becomes horizontal, the vorticity decreases to exactly zero. (No tilt? No vortices!) Prandtl taught all of us that wings are able to fly by pure pressure-difference alone, without needing to move any air downwards. Wrong. This odd viewpoint only arises in wings of infinite span, where the wing is permanently trapped in WIG (or ground-effect,) and the ground is pushing upwards against the wing, with no net downwash-plume behind the wing. But common flight at altitude has zero ground-effect, and the entire lifting-force results from the downwards motion of mass-bearing vortices, according to F=mA. The vortices entrain the air between them, carrying it downwards, so the net downwards momentum can be enormous. (The so-called "Newtonian" description centers on the creation and the downwards momentum of tip-vortices. Wings are examples of reaction-motors, examples of fluid propulsion, same as propellers, helo rotors, sailboats and jet engines.) Note: refer to helicopters in horizontal flight. Perhaps animate them, first hovering, then also, fast horizontal flight. Watch the vortex-pair form, even though the helo lacks a pair of wingtips. Regardless of the number of blades, the rotor still creates a tip-vortex pair. Also, visualize a helicopter during high-altitude hovering. Conventional aircraft obey the same physics, but this may not be obvious, because their rapid horizontal translation is smearing out the "helicopter-style downwash-plume," to become a long, tilted vortex-structure, rather than a vertical cylindrical column. And, when a cylindrical jet is produced by a transversely-moving orifice, its outer shell of vorticity will "wrap up," to become the familiar scroll-shaped vortex-pair. The vortex-pair entrains a large cylinder of down-moving air, trapped within the mathematical "separatrix" which surrounds the vortex-pair. Similarly, a traveling smoke-ring will actually have the shape of a sphere or a lozenge, as can be seen when an invisible vortex-ring enters a region which contains fog or marker-smoke. A vortex-ring is like a flung baseball made of gas. Conclusion: airfoils fly by the reaction-force from launching smoke-rings downwards, but this fact is very difficult to notice if the wing is moving sideways too fast. Better to inspect a hovering helo, where the downwash-plume can be approached as a tall column of vortex-rings, stacked like pancakes. Also, inspect the fluid plume of a pulsing jellyfish, and inspect the violent reaction-kick produced by the famous Wham-O Air Blaster(tm) toy, whenever it launches a transparent ring-vortex. That's the same "Newtonian" description of the lifting-force of airfoils. Odd trivia: the vorticity does not come from the tips of wings. It comes from the wings' trailing edges, the "Sheet-Vortex." But because vorticies move with the wind, the adjacent vortex-threads will move each other, causing the wide thin sheet of vorticity to wind itself up into a dual scroll-shape. If a wing emits marker-smoke (or emits condensation-mist) from its entire trailing edge, this process becomes easy to observe.

ENGINE IN JQ ECTIONS XUXYQÑ VAF VUC jpus jpul STQP RUVY YXUL VTUP DNA YREI SP CATAG ALTO DNEVAND MOJAVEDESSERTVSTOM YRAQUI FREDOMINATION FEDERALLI SHERRIFF PLANTIFF AGENT AGENCY MEXCAN EL PASO VAJA DAKOTA .SPCATAGORY PATAGONIA PORTUGUESE SARATOGA GYSER SIERRA CALISTOGA SPRING AVIAN AQUA XQYLLUVQURJjÑ

COMPRESS AIR HEATED PRESSURED STEEMER BROILER NOT ENGINE GASES ..FUEL LIQUID STEEM VJYFHI PUSHED JLQ j RQÑ PULLED UXTURQ

why not just have the other propeller spin the other way?

What force moves a glider forward through the air?

anybody can tell me please 🙏🙏, why the propeller on exhaust side why not not on the suction side.??

On point dude. Simple and effective

So simple .... Nice video. Thank you

Happy to be educated if I’m mistaken but… Is it correct to state that “without vortices, a wing won’t produce downwash” and therefore no induced drag, as you described with the infinite wing example? I’m under the impression that even without wingtip vortices, the act of redirecting air downward (Induced Flow) generates an equal and opposite force upward (Lift). Because there’s an Induced Flow the Resultant Relative Wind is modified downward. The Lift vector is perpendicular to this modified Resultant Relative Wind, which inclines the Lift vector backwards, and the aft’ing of the Lift Vector is called Induced Drag. Truly hoping for a deeper understanding, I would love to know if my understanding holds water.

on points it trigger the ground wire but on cdi it's common to see the positive to be trigger, is the ground better or theres no difference.

Great easy to understand video. Just what I am looking for as student pilot with busy career family house etc Guessing roll is synonymous with “bank” When do you check your roll on the TC and when do you check your artificial horizon or attitude indicator

I can do laplace and fourier transforms with pen and paper but I'm still anxious about flight school math tests :/

It is amazing how much flight training is actually self taught; with a flight instructors guidance along the way..

Interesting fact about these free turbines: You can start the engine while literally holding the propeller, although you probably shouldn't.

a banana republic!

I've been using KZbin for a long time now. This is the first video I've ever commented on. Thank you 🎉🎉🎉

Great explanation, thank you!

sorry, but quote: the vortices influence the air around the wing so that it is directed downwards what is called downwash....blablabla... NO ! wrong, as on other videos from you! this sentence inpkies that the vortices peoduce the downwash! where do you get that idea? wrong! i block your channel...and it is reported for review of content which is basically dangerous for people to learn that way, it gives weong concepts of aerodynamics! pls learn your stuff before you play teaxher, and if you are an instructor...than this is really hillarious....

wing tim explanation wrong too !

sorry, but ground effect does jot reduce downwash! bcs then the lift factor would not increase but decrease, pls learn your stuff! the vortices are reduced and the "upwash" on the tips is reduced! so your explantion should be wrong! did you read all that just off from a book? then buy some better ones! but as long as people still inssist that drag due to tip vortices becomes stronger the slower a plane flies you might be xcused, seemingly 99% do not understand aerodynamics at all but just read formulae the wrong way....bcs if vortices become stronger the slower a plane flys, then they mist have become indefinitely endlessly strong at standstill, whixh is impossible...case closed, i am off...

over the last 2 years i dound out that almost nobody besides delta fighter designers knows anything about low aspect ratio wings! so everyone repeats the same half truths and generalizes the same rules which are actually only valid for long wings from AR 6 and upwards! and the spitfire didn,t have ellipticals for anything else than a misconception of half truths and how they get guns into the wing roots...kkk but thanks, a good general main stream overview... and no, wing twist Adoes nit reduce drag , it balances stall! nothing else...

Great info & simply explained!! Thank you

Harley Davidson used magnetos on the 900cc Sportster until 1969! No battery, kickstart only, a wonderful machine.

Can we change the CL by changing the Flaps and/or Slat settings?

me turboprop me fly

Great video thank you!

❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤

Much love to you man thanks for the vid

Free turbine turboprop engine? Whats free about it the explanation?

very good

Every turbo prop I. Worked is a free turbine turbo prop 🤦🏻 this shit ain't new. And where are the exhaust gasses going in the strange ass configuration.

This is a great video! Thank you so much

Nice, like the illustration and explanation!

Ah yes, 'why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?'

Tamil Hindu technologies is the powerful one. Temple can fly bruh

Are there any exotic materials inside the PT6 engine? Like Titanium or Inconel?

Thx that was everything what I wanted to know about the V-Tail.

What an excellent video tutorial. Crystal clear! Thank you for your hard work. 😊

(1:42) Unsafe design. Not only that there is a resultant force to push the tail of the plane to the left causing the plane to turn to the right, there is a resultant force to cause the fuselage to spine in a counter-clockwise direction as well. That means the plane may become unstable during turns. Beechcraft Bonanza [what's with the V Tail? Is it Safe, is it really a Doctor Killer?] (4:12)

The prop would rip off at high speeds

Lol understanding engineering techniques are so tough and complicated!!

I thought the turboprop Is powered by Pistons,Thank you for correcting me....👍

Thanks!!

Is there a special tool or trick to installing the drive gear on a 4371 mag ? When you try tighten the nut impulse rotates even when holding gear. Is there a proper way to do this ? Thanks. Great video

Guys what kinda engine is this again? I think i missed it

great video! very easy to digest. thank you

What are you do not understand and I have seen in many videos is that why and how do the vortexes cause wind or air deflection?

Let’s say you’re married. You’re going to work 2 jobs, never be home, give up a nice car, a kitchen remodel, a trip, etc. Guess what? Your life will be hell. You are not going to be a pilot.