Me as a neutral good: i would never My adhd af self:

that in those books that you get the information from or not taking to be set in stone the DM can alter the rules the books are just a guideline

The barbarian, the one trick pony smash and slash

I agree with the name issue. DC is a self-reference and people who don't follow @TheDungeonCoach's channel or any other youtuber who talks about DC20 (who doesn't?) won't understand the name. I disagree with the damage roll issue. Players complain much more about the time combat takes and the fact that a critical roll may very well end up doing little damage. DC20 solves both problems with a single elegant solution. I also disagree with your opinion on the second attack penalty. I think it not only makes the game more balanced (a mechanical reason), but also makes it more realistic. I agree with the monster stat blocks problem. I had to familiarize myself with the rules a lot to understand them at first glance to run my first game. I think it should be designed with new players in mind. I agree with the rest, advantage stacking is a wonderful solution (I wanted to allow double advantage in D&D without destroying the balance of the action economy, but I gave up trying to tweak it)

DnD is unplayable at high levels (lack of balance) and is no go since we play huge campaigns from 1 to 20.

As a Barb I only need to do one thing. Hit anything I don't like. Hit anything that looks like I might not like it. And hit random things just to make sure everybody knows I'm good at hitting things. And drink ale.

LMAO! 😂 My 2 favorite real life hobbies in 1 video! Used to cage fight back in 2017 & actively play TTRPG to this day! (:

I have been playing TTRPGs since 1978, and over the years I have found for myself, when I feel like the game is playing me instead of me playing the game, it’s time to move on from that game.

Completely agree about the immersion thing. I made a globe of my D&D world today, and the moment it was done I just felt "Oh damn! This... this is a real place now..."

Ooof

You failed to mention the $1 / month subscription to gets the assets that we need to do this. I'm sure it just slipped your mind.

S ociety P olitics E conomics R eligion M ilitary

I’m 210% in support of your efforts Anto. ❤

I swear there was a tutorial on how you formatted this setting guide but I can't find it! Where is it!

I like PF2e but it becomes quite a chore at higher levels as a GM. It's not as bad as in PF1e, but it's there. I like how well balanced the system is and how organized it is... but still, I feel I need to become a rules-lawyer to be a good PF2e GM, and I just can't. The modifiers are getting me, it's a tad too much. 😅

Pathfinder 2e is a bastardization of DnD. Regardless of its heavy emphasis on rules and choices, it somehow succeeded in destroying spellcasting classes, has incredibly archaic and unfun summoning mechanics (because yes, a Necromancer should be able to just bring undead out of thin air), and removed Paladin, the DEFINING anti Evil class. Good riddance.

oh l love the idea of using Tarot for DND planning!

As someone who also switched to PF2e then back to 5e I am glad to see I'm not the only one with this perspective. I feel like I only see PF2e players talking about how many customization options there are but nobody talks about how good they are. My group played from levels 1-12 with the free archetype rule and at least 60% of my character sheet was fluff that sounded useful on paper but never saw use over the entire campaign. Even though there are less options in 5e, I can confidently say that I have used 95% of any one of my character's abilities at least once in a campaign. Even after having this experience as a player, I ran a short PF2e campaign and found the system clunkier than I initially thought. Even with Archives of Nethys open, figuring out how the "Grab" trait on a monster's attack worked was clunky, time-consuming, and un-fun. I love the idea of a crunchy, customizable, high fantasy system, but PF2e isn't quite that for me.

Pathfinder rules

When you have more pet creatures in the campaign, then players and every player has about 10 creatures

It do feel like that

Happy new year

Not me, I would be a hard-core DM

Decide yea right lol

Lmfao me😂

For real, this is why you stock up on health potions when you’re clerics gone

For real, this is why you don’t stack all your points directly into wisdom

lol

I swear, I wish I could play one game of DND with you at your choice bro online lol

I love PF2e but it's for sure not for everyone, it has a much more steep learning curve

Be careful what you wish for

Every time the boys would say bet and attempt as much as they could in the same session

lol 😂 me and at the same time, still trying to steal the King crown

Bro, you be killing it with these things it’s hilarious. I love these things. Don’t ever stop please. They lighten up my day whenever they pop up in my feed and trust me I need things to lighten my day up.

12:49 You can do that noise effect with adjustments to the gradient tool alone. Also, if Serif would just allow for scripting/plug-ins, third-parties could figure out ways to provide screen reader support or other equally useful tools. Using the Crop tool + the Eraser tool is a very cool effect that I'm going to steal, thanks!

As a player I think the "tightly balanced" bit is far over-emphasized. Our campaign is running mythic rules and I've got magic items 3 levels higher than I am... and it runs FINE. Sure, combat isn't always a tightly tuned gamble where a TOK could happen... and that isn't the game most people really want, especially not people who would otherwise play 5e. So feel free to be generous with awards, hand out homebrew items and powers, etc. Well balanced doesn't mean easily tipped over, it means STABLE.

O like how easy it is to adjust PF2e because there are lots of balanced things to use as guideposts. So reskinning and custom stuff has clear flags for what will make it balanced, or intentionally unbalanced. It is a bit Crunchy, so I use 13th age for more rules light and fast. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

lol

When I want crunchy, I play Pathfinder 1e. When I want rules lite, I play DnD 5e. PF 2e holds no appeal for me, as much as I tried it across multiple campaigns. It's crunchy but so balanced that your character creation choices have almost no impact. It's supposed to be streamlined but actually about as hard to learn as its much more customizable older brother, PF 1e. Bye bye, 2e. But happy gaming to those who like it.

You know, I always always comment on these videos the majority of the time and I love these little shorts

Love your channel. But i cant even look at D&D 5th ed....power creep is out of control.