Hehehe can’t say I disagree 😅😂

There are no autobiographies or biographies of Jesus and whether it be the Christian’s Testament or the Tanach neither are historical books. We have no writings from Jesus and the authors of the gospels are also unknown with only 7 of the 13 letters of Paul actually being his. Moses died before the book of Deuteronomy ended while scholars know of 4 different sources for the “Old Testament “. It is those who follow who write the most.

@ do you even know the definition of biography? Obviously not.

"Listen to the great Shakespeare scholar Alexander Waugh...." Alexander Waugh was not a Shakespeare scholar. He had no formal education in the subject of Shakespeare and his era, and he regularly did what scholars are not permitted to do, which is make crap up. For example, one time he claimed to me, in pursuance of shoring up Eva Turner Clark's impossible proposal that the lost _Portio and Demorantes_ was a transcription error for "Portia and the Merchants", that the name in _The Merchant of Venice_ had always been "Portio" until the Shakespeare editor John Payne Collier standardized it in the 19th century. Unfortunately, he made the mistake of telling that lie in a comment section other than his own, where he would have simply deleted all evidence of his dishonesty, and he made the mistake of telling it to someone who had read the First Folio in its entirety. I demonstrated using the same stage direction, where the Prince of Morocco and his train enter with Portia, that it had been Portia all along in both the 1600 first quarto and the 1623 First Folio. These resources were as available to Waugh as myself. Scans and transcriptions of the Shakespeare quartos and First Folio are omnipresent on the internet. I even have a facsimile edition of the First Folio printed by Yale University Press back in the mid-1950s. Yet instead of bothering to check, he just hauled off and made a false assertion because it flattered his prior beliefs and because he was accustomed to being in an echo chamber where every word of his was taken on absolute faith. So you should only listen to Alexander Waugh if you're willing to be lied to by a serial fantasist. "All the evidence points to the Elizabethen coutier Edward de Vere as the author." What evidence? Is there a single 16th or 17th century title page in the entire Shakespeare canon that credits the contents to Edward de Vere instead of William Shakespeare? Is Edward de Vere listed as the author in Stationers' Register entries? Is he named as the author in Revels Account entries? Is he credited with any part of the Shakespeare canon in literary anthologies of the period? (No, and sometimes de Vere and Shakespeare are named separately in the same anthologies, thus signifying that they were understood to be different authors.) Did any contemporary of Shakespeare's say clearly and unequivocally that it was known that Edward de Vere was the author of William Shakespeare's works? And, lacking any of these more direct forms of evidence, is there any stylometric evidence that shows that de Vere's acknowledged writings are a good fit for the writings in the Shakespeare canon? No, there's not even that. In fact, stylometry _excludes_ Edward de Vere decisively from having contributed anything to the Shakespeare canon, much less having written the whole thing. Meanwhile, we have the converse for William Shakespeare: it's his name on the title pages, it's his name in the Stationers' Register entries, it's his name in the Revels Accounts, his name in contemporary literary anthologies, and every contemporary who bothered to speak on the subject identified Shakespeare as an author, including numerous figures who would have known him personally like John Heminges, Henry Condell, John Lowin, Ben Jonson, John Webster, Leonard Digges, etc., etc., etc. "It's quite remarkable that there are educated folks in the 21st century who still thinks the man from Stratford wrote the plays of Shakespeare...." Perhaps they're accustomed to defer to the documentary evidence and contemporary testimony, all of which says that William Shakespeare was an author, and none of which challenges that identification. Perhaps the problem is that you're not educated enough, but you think you know more than you actually do because you've been accustomed to listen to liars like Alexander Waugh.