It's great you are consciously teaching your kids your values. That is so important today. A great resource to inoculate kids from the mind viruses of the day is a book called GO FREE: A GUIDE TO ALIGNING WITH THE ARCHETYPE OF WESTERNKIND, by Jason Kohne. The author goes by the handle of No White Guilt. That book changed my life and my understanding as to the problems facing the West.

God is male, and the angels are male. The only time femininity entered was Eve, and only then did females exist.

Israel is a questionable allie to the US.

A large segment of vindictive and aggrieved non-whites don't want to have an honest conversation about race. What they want is white people to baby them, and affirm their fantasy about the "racism" they have been told they face everyday, despite evidence to the contrary. A truly honest conversation would address the antiwhitism within much of the black population.

The 'smarter' we get, the dumber we are. // Btw, loved the video but please don't ever do the squeak sound again. That's excruciating to listen to. 😊

Well, once one gets rid of the Heavenly Mother and the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost as individual scriptural beings, and replaces that with the Platonic amorphous, genderless, emotionless, immaterial spirit essence (pure mind), the totally "other" (Plato and Nicene Christianity), outside of time and space (in the realm of archtypes or ideas for Plato and the otherwhere of Hellenized Christianity's single heaven), all sorts of nonsense ensues. The sad thing is that there is no "a" in that verse from John. That verse is a metaphor. "A" destroys the metaphor, as a number of non-member's of the Church of Jesus Christ have found: to translate (John 4:24) 'God is a Spirit' is the most gross perversion of the meaning. C.H. Dodd, The Interpretation of the Fourth Gospel, p. 225. (the passage at John 4:24) is not an essential definition of God, but a description of God's dealing with men; it means that God is Spirit toward men because he gives the Spirit (xiv 16) which begets them anew. There are two other such descriptions in the Johannine writings: "God is light" (1 John i 5), and "God is love" (1 John iv 8). These too refer to the God who acts; God gives the world His Son, the light of the world (iii 19, viii 12, ix 5) as a sign of His love (iii 16). Raymond E. Brown, The Gospel According to John, p. 172. This is the difference between the God of scripture and the later added, Hellenized god accepted at Nicea and further developed over the next 1000 years: The God of the Hebrew Bible is very different from the supreme God of Plato or Aristotle. The former is an anthropomorphic being capable of anger, joy, and other emotions, who created the world and continues to direct human affairs. The God of the philosophers, however, was a much less human and much more abstract figure, incapable of emotion, and far removed from the daily concerns of humanity. Many Jews tried to combine these two conceptions, or, more precisely, to reinterpret the God of the Bible in the light of the ideas of the philosophers, especially Plato....This approach to scripture was developed even further by Origen, Ambrose, and other fathers of the church. Shaye J.D. Cohen, From Maccabees to the Mishnah, vol. 7 of the Library of Early Christianity, p. 44.

Another miraculous slam dunk for Joseph Smith - we really are created in the image of a Heavenly Father and a Heavenly Mother just as the Bible says! And because of the pure truth of that revelation, it's immune to the slippery slope of "God isn't a man he's an amorphous Trinity being of no body, parts or passions" "In reply to a Minister's inquiry about the distinguishing doctrine of Mormonism, Joseph told him that 'we believe the Bible and they do not' ". JS, Journal, Jan 21 1836, in PJS, 2:155.

If men don't comprehend the nature of God, they don't comprehend themselves.

I saw your video and had to click. I knew you'd destroy these guys.

This is what happens when you believe in the trinitarian god. Instead of God being an exalted form of man, you have what amounts to an infinitely large cloud with multiple personality disorder. The trinitarian god is specifically and emphatically not understandable. Not being able to describe their god is a feature, not a bug. It almost seems to be intentional. It's almost like there's some sort of malevolent bodiless entity that wanted people to worship bodilessness as an affront to an embodied God. It's made all the more baffling when these same people worship a resurrected God, Who has clearly demonstrated to worth and value of being embodied by resurrecting Himself.

I find it interesting that charlie didn’t use Pascal’s wager. While there are some flaws to it, it would work well in response to a question like this.

That beep is very obnoxious and in no way adds any real value. Just give us the number if you want to count them. Extremely interesting topic and information but I'm going to have to say hard pass with the obnoxious beep with your face popping on the screen.

This was such a great video. Shared with my Instagram pages. We know so little about the people who lived in North America because of the Spanish and European conquest in the 15th and 16th centuries

lol that beep really annoying! frustrating ! 🤣yeah no really, great idea lets add more frustration instead of substance to the claims

Great video. I quite enjoyed the chirps.

Yoh, our dear brother Trent has an all too common defeciency with respect to MDS. And there were Jaredites.

Why did you put 3000 BC to 30AD in your comment? Wouldn't you say 400 AD?

FCUK ISLAM...

@14:30 "Fellow conservatives who hate Trump" first of all supporting Trump, that supported the atrocious soft on crime policies, including releasing Al-Qaeda terrorists, and Isis terrorists, and the "first step at" proves that you're not really a "fellow conservative" you are a sycophant appeasing trump left-wing BS and pretending he's a conservative quote to have a guy become president by telling the media to pound sand "that's not what he did. He appeased the left wing even making ridiculous statements that George Floyd's death was because white cops are racist and he didn't receive equal treatment, Trump is a liar and a left-wing infiltrator, who even claimed that George Floyd might be floating around like a fairy angel "looking down" from heaven, you are part of the left. Trump is the left-wing pretending to be conservative dummy kzbin.info/www/bejne/omPNnHmeedeCisk

Pity about thr sound quality!

The LDS don't need Catholic approval to be Christian's.

Turek would surely throw be a stone tosser. While the Christian in name only, John McCarther, would truly try to brain a Mormon if he could.

What an anti-Mormon bigot. So disgusting and hateful. Btw, Mormons don't need Protestant's approval. I would go so far as say Protestant's aren't Christian. For they lack the love of Christ in dealing with their fellow men.

Would you still like to dialogue? Idk why my comments aren’t showing up.

I think what he is pointing out is that locating one person's historical footprint is a tough askand should not be required. However, an entire civilization should yield some sort of physical footprint. Why are yall calling him an atheist? Based on what he said so far it seems like he is pro religion. What video are you debating? Does not seem to be the one that keeps repeating the first 15 sec of?

Hey TJ sidenote: if you haven't heard of Robert Boylan he's an excellent LDS defender and is former Catholic. He has a Mike Winger response video that is honestly one of the best rebuttals to an attack on Joseph Smith I've ever seen. The KZbin Video is called "Response to Mike Winger (‪@MikeWinger‬) on Joseph Smith's Boasting" by Robert Boylan. I thought you might find it worth a watch as you've had your own comments on when Mike Wings it.

That last clip of Trent was gold lol. I'd love to hear your take on more Trent Horn content. He has gone on a crusade against the BoM after not taking his debate with Jacob from thoughtful faith seriously. Why won't he actually engage with the text and content of the BoM instead of focusing on the archaeological or naturalistic explanations? The Catholic Church seems to have become the modern Pharisees gatekeeping the traditions of men and having a form of godliness but denying the power thereof

Please explain the trinity for us.... Okay so [30 minutes later] you're not Christian.

Wow - you ppl are silly. What a straw man you set up. Book of Mormon is total nonsense and probably Satanic in origin.

Thats jokes. I've never heard such a bad argument to 'own' the atheists and the LDS. he needs to pick an avenue of attack and then think before he tries to be smart. Epic to see Tucker open his mind to stuff - the path to wisdom is recognizing what you dont know.

Trent: Lack of evidence is not a problem for things I want to believe, but a huge problem for things I don't want to believe. 😂😂😂😂 But, there were large civilizations anciently in the New World, some of which have some or a great deal of elements of what is portrayed in the Book of Mormon. Nope Trent, try again.

We will see increasing attacks against the truth, including attacks against the Book of Mormon. Its all part of the great Deception preceeding the Tribulations.

Theres a perfect creator that desires something imperfect how is that possible.. really thats the big question? So parker does believe in god? No wait he dosent think the resurrection happened and church is a scam..in other words im an atheist but let me educate you on your own religion that i dont believe in and tell you how wrong it is. This is the problem with you atheists you dont believe in word of the bible but try and use it as proof for your dis beliefs. Its like saying i dont believe in math and science here is this math equation on why math and science is not real. Fyi these are intellectually dishonet questions and you and parker know this. 5 minutes is not enough time to answer even 1 of his quesions let alone prove anything about the actual topic at hand which is why kids are getting scammed and ripped off going to college

So if Charlie had no answer, there is no answer and therefore he is blue pilled? So Charlie has all answers in the world and you judge by him the matter of significance? So you are the biggest fan of him XD

The Church of Christ is not an specific institution, but those which stays in the basis of what the Jesus and apostles taught.

"The Church"is referring to Christianity as a whole to include all denominations. "College" refers to all colleges and a college education as a whole.

You have everything out of context and speaking calmly more than a usual red piilled democrat doesnt make your position any better. I was expecting for you to take a neutral point but you are just another democrat. Do better. Ill pray for you, oh wait, you dont believe in God.

Hey there, you responded to a comment I left on Jacob Hansen's most recent video about debating or discussing which was more plausible, Mormonism or Christianity. I keep trying to respond to you on that thread, but it won't show up for some reason, anyways I'd be happy to take you up on that offer! How can I get in contact with you?

and about 47,500 (as of now) man made Christian denominations and growing.

Part 2! Part 2! Part 2!

I don't think it's unreasonable for a perfect being to desire something imperfect. I think you're putting perfection in a box it doesn't deserve to be in. For example, in Buddhism, perfect is, essentially, wanting nothing. The question would be better to ask "how can a perfect being desire anything? Wouldn't the nature of wanting something define the perfect being as imperfect by not having something that it wants? It lacks that which would make it whole, thus rendering it imperfect since there is a greater state for it to be in that it isn't." But I don't think that's fair. I don't think that perfection is to be without desire and I don't think perfection demands that you can't want something that isn't perfect. Imagine, for example, that there is a thing that cannot be "perfect". The nature of the object is that "perfection" is a matter of opinion. Something, like a hamburger, could be an object wherein "perfection" is to taste, rather than an objective criteria. Saying that God couldn't be perfect if He wanted a hamburger is weird. Why would God be less because God wants the "best" hamburger, but cannot, by logic, have a perfect one? This whole question series is pointless without a usable definition of perfect and I don't think we have that. At the very least, I don't understand perfection.

Some other thoughts. The Book of Mormon makes it possible to understand the Bible. That is why it has the fullness of the everlasting gospel. The questions this young man was putting to Charlie Kirk are, of their nature, Anti-Christ. The Book of Mormon marvelously equips us to confound and answer the questions and tactics of an anti-christ. It seems evident, from the attitude and amusement of the young man, and many in the audience, that they derive a sense of power and importance from asking what they think are unanswerable questions. It appears to be an intellectual game that gives them great delight and feeds their sense of pride. Nevertheless, these young people deserve true and honest answers to their questions, no matter their motivations.

God desires us to become perfect but we often don't desire the same thing. Since He honors our moral agency, we can choose good or evil, darkness or light, liberty or captivity, perfection or imperfection. And that is reflected in the number of different Christian denominations. Who all refer to themselves as the Christian Church. Also Charlie confuses the Church with Christ. He said that the Church gives us eternal life, which is obviously and patently untrue. Eternal life is in our Savior Jesus Christ and only through Him. The Church or, more specifically, the Priesthood, administers the ordinances of salvation but they are worthless without the grace of Christ.

the kid is ultra annoying however you raise good points about Charlie.

Thank you for covering this!! I was hoping a channel would do this! And from an LDS perspective all of those questions have answers in our theology

There is no problem of black on white crime.... interracial crime is rare...in some years over 200 whites are killed...Most years even less. People like Fatherly like to talk about the most brutal of these crimes, but never bring up the yearly stats because they are laughably low....meanwhile, white drunk driving will kill more black innocent bystanders in a year than all the black murders in a year combined. Meanwhile blacks in countries like Barbados, Kenya, Aruba, Ghana, have the lowest crime rates on earth. American blacks are the most violent blacks on earth...this clearly shows that The environment blacks have been put in is the catalyst...Americans of all races but Hispanic commit more crime than their home countries.

I agree with Adam, I disagree with you HaleStorm. It's known to be a method of reducing the voter rolls and the less people vote, the Republicans win more. They stood on a podium in a Republican convention secret meeting to announce this, and it's been their strategy ever since. In other words the less democracy there is, the more the Republicans win (because the popular vote tends be always with the Democrats, even if they're just Republican lite these days). Don't forget that it's about NOT having the ID with you, but being registered on the roll which is an advance step to actually voting on the day in question. It massively affects poorer communities who have to travel potentially miles to reregister every time and hence may not do it owing to cost, difficulty, lack of time, hence reducing more progressive Democrat voting (don't think I'm a Democrat fan, I'm not, but the Republican are literally a death cult). It's a filthy trick that only individuals that have no interest in democracy play with for political gain. A decent country would encourage mass voting, would do everything to ensure eligible voters stay on the rolls, as opposed to making that process "in certain places" a relatively and sometimes very difficult task. Bill Maher is a liberal right winger who fucking loves the status quo, and takes no interest in people who see American democracy as nothing more than a joke. Adam is relatively left wing - they weren't going to get on.

Either a secular marriage is valid in the eyes of God, or its not. Either its a sacrament or its not.

Love hearing Truman! Thank you!

I love to hear Trumans unique voice. Miss him. Thanks for sharing this and Thanks to Truman.