Hi Craig, could you try again and if it still doesn't work, please reply to the confirmation email you've received.

@ Still didn’t work, so I replied to that email as you requested. Thanks!

Got it!

They aren't in the shop. Are you subscribed to the newsletter? That's how you get them.

Come on, since when is the Q3 bad at high ISOs. I am shooting mine at 1600 and even when pushing the files in post I have no complaints.

It's a Panasonic that's why

Thank you. The company is called Haoge but please don't ask me how to pronounce it. 😂

@ oh yes, I know them they’re good 👍

That is good and bad because it also means that you won't lose any money when selling it again. 😀

There is an endless amount of looks out there. 😆

Yes it used to be definitely the case with film. Everyone was suing the same types of film so the difference in rendition had to be lenses. The point is moot with digital as every camera manufacturer has definite color profiles but the can easily be modified (and lenses have actually improved to the point, mostly with computer-assisted design and manufacturing, that it is very difficult to see differences between excellent lenses by different manufacturers).

The sensor glass combo is pretty stunning. The 43 seems even better.

It's not about putting a look in top. A bad photo will still be a bad photo. For me, user experience is way more important and will reflect in my images.

That is not what "the Leica look" actually means or you are ignoring the fact that every film, lens, sensor+camera processor combination interprets the information it collects in different ways, always different from your own eyes/brain combination for sure. In other words everything through which one looks at light and the world will be interpreted by the very tools that are being used. [what is the "official/real" look of reality anyway? ;o)]

Sure, that's the most important part.

The is a difference between form ("look") and content. Storytelling and decisive moment are content; looks are form. There is no doubt that you need a synergy between both but they are separate entities.

@ understood

Danke dir! Komm vorbei, wird geil!

If you use quality glass, yes not much difference I guess.

There is an easy fix for it. Simply don't look at your bank account. Seriously, it might be a steep price initially but the camera hold their value much better than other cameras. When upgrading to a new model it's only half or less even after using the camera for a few years.

The only caveats to this often-heard comment are first that it is too often said by people who have never really experienced a Leica Camera for any length of time, second that a lot of us, Leica users, have bought our first Leica used, as a test (thanks to those, whomever they might be, that bought them new ;o) and that the test happened to be that convincing that we stayed with the brand (for whatever reasons and the list is long, one of them being longevity and craftsmanship... and yes Leica equipment is not perfect but at least carefully designed and until now still with the photographing experience in mind-just look at the menus), thirdly Leica is the only brand still producing range-finder cameras (both film and digital); these cameras do not fit all the needs or comfort zones of many, but they do for some others and as such they are unique... and there might be a price to pay too for what they are, how they were designed and however they are manufactured. Just try one and see with it fits you and your photography or not. In my mind that is the only good argument. In the end cameras and lenses are tools (for those who actually use them on a regular basis) and as such a good tool (one that meets one's needs) makes life easier and one's workflow/photography more efficient.

If you buy right, you don't spend money on Leica. They don't lose value and in some cases, they appreciate in value while I'm using them daily. But then subjectively it is partly a life choice. Some people enjoy looking at their bank accounts.

I'll think about it. 👌🏼

Thank you Jake! 🙏

Thank you! 😊

Thank you. I used the DJI Action 5 Pro.

Thanks so much John.

Well, my setup weighs the same as a GFX100s body without a lens. 😆 It's also cheaper

Danke dir! Einer Genehmigung bedarf es da nicht. Thailand ist glücklicherweise nicht so bürokratisch verseucht wie Deutschland. :D

It's still cropping and as I said in the video it's what I am trying to avoid.

They will all fail at some point and after having it fixed and serviced it was the best moment to sell it. I have two friends that own X-Pans and both have issues.