Word.

Great interview, thank you.

I share the sentiment towards Dr. Bruce Lipton. I am so looking forward to seeing him live this coming May 4th in Santa Cruz. Great interview!

Too much bashing Donald Trump driven by his own erroneous beliefs

Love with integrity, many of us now understand.

31:50 "The deceivers get better and better at deceiving" Here, Hoffman sketches a Darwinian rationale for oligarchism. Natural selection favours deception. If you want 99% of the population to toil on your behalf, the 1% must cultivate an unrelenting web of lies while compartmentalizing and secreting away occulted information. Just as an extended period of credit-creation develops potentially competitive non-oligarchic group based on meritorious attainment, the Law of Too Large Numbers (unserviceable debt) collapses society into a new Dark Age. The bankers skim the technological fruits of that era, sustain their wealth in exogenous non-credit forms, and start the rat race anew. Just wait until VR hits its stride. The 99% will be lost forever as the 1% put further and further distance between them and us. That would be the logic. So deception beats cooperation, veredicity is a fool's errand and the pinnacle of natural selection is seamless self-deception. Segue: The Man of Lawlessness or Antichrist will be fully evicted by his host and will by that time have shed all prior human aspect in order to serve as perfect host. Perfect deception = perfect lawlessness. Darwin, no eschatologist, would reject perfect arrival or completed eschatology. But the evolutionary triumph of deception is not anathema to Abrahamic eschatology.

Ok, the speaker is wonderful but she does something rather annoying during this entire video which is ask the audience questions and for feedback. Now, the fact that nobody was given a microphone and she being in the room yet does not hear what the audience member says so she says, what, I'm sorry, to get the person to repeat and they do...NONE of which the microphone recording the video captures so you have no idea of what is being said if she does not repeat them and she rarely does. So the audience interaction that you can only hear her side of the conversation does not feel like it is helpful to the process of sharing her information and experiences. It is like having forced pauses in the middle of her stream of consciousness while she tries to hear someone you never hear. If anything the people that put this together could have closed captioned those moments so even though you don't hear them, you can read them. Then it would make the interactions not a waste of video or go back and cut them out since you cannot hear them anyway.

JESUS THATS ALL

Hard to avoid any cognitive biases but there is no comparison with pan paniscus (more or less egalitarian female/male coalitions and playful prosociality/sociosexuality for promotion of group stability regardless of age and gender as a byproduct of neoteny/domestication syndrome depending on a specific socioecological environment according to Richard Wrangham) and inter-male competition in humans resulting in clandestine behaviour (cooperation maintenance hypothesis: not peer reviewed) for some reason.

Is Bernardo a reader of Heidegger?

Thoughts on perspectives of Bohm and Pylkkänen?

Thank you so much for this helpful elucidation of the theory and basis of mindfulness practice!

In Islam consciousness= taqwa Being mindful and present of God’s presence (who is overlooking from above)

This lovely man should at the very least be knighted for shedding light on some of the deepest questions faced by humanity. His erudition is awesome. Thank you once again, Dr Sheldrake!

How did i get here. I stayed for the interesting conversation.

Irene's clarity of thought has really nailed my understanding of the subject

I think that Irene's work is very interesting.it really speaks to me 😊❤

I was going to give the speaker a second chance I followed her for a while, but found it difficult to listen to her style of speaking, she says umm over and over again and for some reason it really triggers me. I tried for a few minutes and then just couldn’t do. it. I spent hours listening to podcasts every day and I’ve never heard of speaker in this realm use so many filler words.

These are just talk. You have to make the experience to navigate the unconscious mind. Do you dare?

All the people complaining about him saying "right" too much are like a bunch of little kids. This is an amazing lecture, not hard to listen to. Try dropping a comment that's useful or significant, no one cares how annoyed you are. Y'all's comments and level of maturity are way more annoying than anything else. This video is deep af, and all y'all got to say is "Duurrp he sure says Right a lot!" Seriously this is Jungian psychology, grow tf up. Try comprehending the subject matter, maybe grow into a person with something useful to say.

Phenomenal lecture, and she trained under David Buss. Gotta find more of her content!!

"it can take as little as 15min for a man to produce a child." I can do it in a fraction of that time 😤

Even if there are 1000 loving people at your deathbed, You Die Alone

Great keynote. So many great scientific evidence.

Fabulous discussion. As a Zen meditator, I KNOW that Donald sees it. Anil, clearly an excellent thinker, doesn’t, I think really understand what the former is explaining. Admittedly to most people, it is a hard sell. But I am delighted that after thousands of years consciousness as minutely detailed by the leading Zen Buddhist scholars/philosophers (particularly those of the Chan school) is being supported by theoretical physics. Thank you for sharing this.

Eating meat is an addiction!! What!!! That’s crazy to say, so nobody should eat meat?! Why is it!?

Naïve realist materialism entails a contradiction in terms: namely, it presupposes that the qualia of consciousness are not the qualia of consciousness. Now, not only is a naïve realist materialism self-refuting, because it presupposes and is founded upon a contradiction in terms (the assumption that qualia are not qualia), but, it is naïve too, implying the absence of impartial criticism, because under no circumstances whatsoever does impartial criticism lead to a contradiction in terms: in other words, naïve realist materialism entails dogmatism (accepting some thesis as true (namely, the thesis that qualia are not qualia) without further reflection, without grounds, without substantiation). The application of impartial criticism inevitably, incontrovertibly, and necessarily leads to a phenomenalist stance (if by phenomenalism is meant “the acknowledgement that what we know is our own consciousness and its attendant qualia”): the application of impartial criticism cannot lead to a contradiction in terms, and, ipso facto, cannot lead to a naïve realist materialism. In a word, it is superfluous to refute materialism, because materialism refutes itself (by way of entailing a contradiction in terms, by assuming that qualia are not qualia); additionally, naïve realist materialism is incompatible with a genuinely impartial criticism, since the application of impartial criticism inevitably leads one to the conclusion that what we know is our own consciousness and its attendant qualia (that we are consciousness ouroborically in a state of interaction with itself, namely, consciousness interacting with its own qualia). kzbin.info/www/bejne/bKOVo2OCqa98oMksi=9FJsI_XJoefpWyXD

You are very wrong according to the WILL. I think we would be much more unhappy if we could choose our OUR will. Any fulfillment of our own will would lead us to always bigger and bigger unhappiness. On any new path/journey according to our own will we would be somehow happy expecting something, BUT each time after having reached the goal, we would be totally empty. That is the software built in, beacuse we are not created to be leaders, to enjoy the life just for the sake of enjoyment, NO, we are made to be SERVANTS. We can be happy when we serve and when we understand the greatest pleasure is to serve.

I appreciate Dr. Lembke’s views but I strongly disagree. Your brain has a built in Automatic Grain Control (AGC) circuit on your senses. It will increase the volume on your senses if the signal is too low and will decrease it if the signal is too high. So if you’re an recovering addict, your senses will be turned down really low because they have been over loaded. This will leave you felling depressed if you try to quit cold turkey. It will then take time for them to re-normalize.

Transhumanist mumbo jumbo. This guy did too many drugs.

This man is a crackpot and so too the guys on weed foolwing him language language man , the earth is the planet and the world is the idea of life and living which is inside of you , so please don't keep cogitating and speaking your idle mind to the public and stop using and corrupting philosophy with other rubbish. In his ramblings it can be seen exactly how his mind works he's still talking to himself even now since he's all mixed up with things out side and his superimpositions on the so called world " outside" ( earth )

I love how you say "apprenticeship" when referring to learning co-regulation as young humans 🥰

How can this fascinating (informative & entertaining) presentation, after 4 years, have only seven (7!) comments??😢 That's not only sad, but also, well, LAUGHABLE!😂

I was cold turkey 7 years ago and I almost died from this the hell Journey I've had to travel through is still not over thank you for this video

What is the evolutionary perspective on IFS? Why does this seem to work?

min 6:20 "...objective reality is a useful fiction."

I like isha kryia as form of meditation !

Fasting from various things also helps !

Johan, i read your book " Chasing the scream". Loved it, fascinated by the content and as someone who has never been high on drugs and always felt that junkies and their dealers were better left dead, you provided me with a different perspective and i thank you for that. Yet now, you come come out as a Trump hater.....why? So you are just another Trump hating "journalist"... Why align yourself politically, publicly, with ANY party...beyond me how someone so obviously smart and driven could be so fkn stupid, and petty. You lost me, good riddance.

I am so grateful for the opportunity to listen to this kind of interviews! I am fascinated with Bernardos's work but I also want to highlight the amazing work that the interviewer does! Thank you to the both of you! Much love ❤

This man has some brilliant insights, and you just have to overlook the intense bombardment of politics and take in the truth you need. Human beings (like he might say!) are vulnerable and can't do everything well. Richard Schwartz's internal family systems/parts work book, No Bad Parts, is the same way -- just ignore the politics if you don't share them. Imho.... would I prefer they left them at the door? Yes. Also do women need help with vulnerability and communication and wise self control? Of course!

Space/time is doomed. Science reduced to a slogan or mantra. This conversation sounded like a scientist (Seth) talking with a speculative fiction writer (Hoffman).

Psychiatry is religious persecution. The comments section speaks for itself. Would jesus be persecuted using the DSM OT1? How ‘bout the bible? god?… It’s why I don’t care for sports. “Organic disorders”… Bullying? Feed the “enemy” psychedelics then persecute them. In the movie Platoon the laid back guys were the potheads. The beer drinkers were antagonistic. A psychedelicized cat will not eat a mouse. Eli “Echo” Lilly… I read the DSM3 in a public library in 1993 and found it to be purely subjective and highly controversial. According to the DSM5. Autism does not exist… -There is no such thing as a chemical imbalance. -So what can the public do about that?… -Dear god, thanks for lying to me. I trusted these people. -Psychaitry/ology is nonsense. Pip, pip tally ho. Cheerio!

While I tend to agree with Donald Hoffman's assertion that consciousness gives rise to space-time and the world we live in... I'm not sure why he was part of this conversation. He never participated in the conversation. Donald Hoffman seems like an intelligent man... Which is why I cannot quite understand his inability to zero in on the topic. Congratulations to Anil Seth for his ability to maintain his composure... As he was the only one with substantive responses. I found the comments by Anil Seth about being in an echo chamber a very polite way to describe the conversation he just had with Donald Hoffman.

that is, it is like distancing yourself from yourself in a critical approach to your life, towards yourself, indeed, it is a science of awareness in which you can get to the heart of the problem and fix it, in fact, by distancing yourself instead of stressing about the problem in its entirety. It's like looking at everything from a distance, i.e. us as an individual with ourselves, having a view of the world, understanding ourselves in the world separately, and then the world and ourselves again in the world, i.e. our interior and reality as one, as a path - the past as the genesis in its entirety and the future as a goal, ourselves today as the sum of experiences, i.e. ourselves from the past, the knowledge now acquired on its basis and the knowledge we lack. There is always a puzzle that you can't see, it's there, but it's like an empty field in Scrubble, it's worth looking for it, but don't force it, because you can get lost, even though the missing piece is right in front of you. Despite everything, we need to somehow look at how we are built and what makes us who we are. Who we are? What are they made of? Throw away all this thinking and rummaging, feel yourself, get closer to yourself through purification and getting to know yourself as an element in the universe anew. See the puzzle from afar and fix the whole thing. This is what makes us free, happy and comfortable. Be able to engage in the right way. Get out and in. This is how I understand this lecture on this therapy. Sometimes it is not enough to go to the forest and calm down, but it is a good start to come back and try to find yourself again in reality and complete yourself again. Sometimes you have to throw everything away and start over yourself. It doesn't always have to be a brutal act towards yourself. It is worth being able to help another person understand your problem of lack of happiness. Sometimes this is enough to make changes that start in our heads and a change in consciousness can rearrange our picture and everything will fall into place by itself. The art is to be able to consolidate it, to be able to return to it. Life is art. Each of us needs to perform some act sometimes. It is important to remember that everything has its consequences, for example screaming can influence external and internal reality, not only in the form of a halo effect, but also determining the transformation. What matters is what essence we shout and how. If our anger contains essence and is shouted out badly, with negative emotions, this fact will deepen our problem, if we do it with the intention of getting rid of these emotions, we will understand that we need to mature to feel another emotion that will allow us to get rid of those emotions using it. , this is usually accompanied by acceptance and understanding at the same time. This requires knowledge. We obtain knowledge from within. Sometimes we need another person who knows our insides inside and out and will help us get to know ours. Sometimes music helps, sometimes a book, finding connections with the outside world can fascinate, we feel vibrations with what attracts and satisfies us, we can focus energy within ourselves and capture the essence, the longer it stays with us, the better we will feel, it is worth starting with the smallest things . Appreciate something you've earned, e.g. a good breakfast. Realize the meaning of shopping, how it is done, that you need to plan it, just like planning meals, and notice the order in which it is done. Plan and do. Fulfill the assumptions. This simple exercise shows how much we can miss in life, which makes our life incomplete. This is the path to a fuller understanding of happiness, the simplicity of life, the virtues, how everything around us is created, what truths it is based on, and from what it comes.

Lotta teachers get in big trouble sexually when their desires arise "on behalf of the whole" and they are unconsciously swept into participation! Just sayin', Rupert.

34:00 IFS

✅ very good

I find myself smiling like Niall listening to this. Fantastic implications for education and research here.

Cant find any comment of anyone disagreeing with him so here i am. This sounds like confirmation bias in the opposite direction. To assume less brain activity equals consciousness arising outside the brian is just as big an assumption as some of the things he treats with major disdain. I will give him this, i do believe he believes himself, which is pretty refreshing as there are a lot of con men hiding as experts in their feild. He also is very thought provoking, just very far from convincing.