5 ай бұрын
10 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
11 ай бұрын
Жыл бұрын
Жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
2 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@wyattkoppy4000 6 сағат бұрын
this video needs updating
@MechanicalAdvantage 6 сағат бұрын
@@wyattkoppy4000 why?
@Drewdlemac 2 күн бұрын
How did you choose your tool ?
@alejandrosimsags 3 күн бұрын
Damm... Great video... Thanks :)🤙
@1428fuad 4 күн бұрын
Thanks mate. Appreciated for your video.
@Todestelzer 4 күн бұрын
I use it to get parts out of complex assemblies. Fusion is faster and you can make one CAM setup for each part of the assembly. No clutter of different setups for different parts.
@tonycerniglia4777 5 күн бұрын
In industry prior to probes, a guage block was used for setting Z height accurately.. So, if using a 1" guage block (or "JO"), simply lower the tool to a height where the block cannot slide in between the stock and cutter tip. Now raise the cutter until you can. Just remember that when you go too high THE BLOCK CANNOT BE UNDER THE CUTTER WHEN LOWERING! If it is, and you are dialing in that last couple of tenths in "Z" you WILL BREAK THE CUTTER TIP... in normal conversation I would now say "ask me how I know." Usually guys would have a second 1 inch JO block for this and obviously it is necessary to enter the 1 inch "Z" value as your "Z" height at the machine.
@OriginalJetForMe 7 күн бұрын
This is great! I have long wished I could use the result of the previous op as the stock for the next op, didn’t realize they supported that!
@Scottforyoutube 7 күн бұрын
Great video! Thanks!
@tonycerniglia4777 8 күн бұрын
One criticism...... f'ng WOW! That's it.
@stewartduncan2110 8 күн бұрын
Kevin, this is exactly what i was looking for. The way i ave been working is more complex. Can you also show the process you used for bringing the parts and vices into the file and jointing them. I noticed the parts are still linked but the vices aren’t. Is this important
@MechanicalAdvantage 8 күн бұрын
You can look at the videos of how I built the parametric vises. I have videos for both fixed jaw and self centering vises on my channel. The component was linked because I had no intention of editing it in that file. By leaving it linked, any change I made to the original would have propagated to the assembly file. The vises had their link broken because they need to have a unique jaw spacing in the assembly file. When linked (and not using configs), you can't have a jaw opening of one value in the original file and a different jaw opening in the assembly file. Breaking the link allows you to control the value in the assembly file.
@jasonrye170 8 күн бұрын
Looking forward to a Heights video. Gives me headaches!
@misterwilling 9 күн бұрын
Incredible, very different from how I am used to doing it as long time MasterCAM user. I have lots to learn to transition to Fusion. Thanks for making a great video!
@MechanicalAdvantage 8 күн бұрын
I'd love to know the method used to do this in Mastercam. I'm not familiar enough with that software to know how it is done. Does it seem harder or easier to do in Fusion?
@robertcarr5846 9 күн бұрын
Hello Kevin, Welcome back, Happy Holidays
@emillewis8309 9 күн бұрын
I like how you got rid of the "hat" in op 2 with a 3d adaptive and a face mill but why the .1" radial stock to leave? Thank you for another great video!
@MechanicalAdvantage 8 күн бұрын
Notice that the value I used was negative -.1 radial. I just did some checking and it didn't make a huge difference. I like to make sure the tool is starting outside the stock. The boundary for the tool path is the stock. By setting a negative radial, I was trying to push the tool away at the start a bit by offsetting the boundary -.1 radial. I just did a check with that value set to 0 and the value at -1. I'll list the start values below. 0 Radial Stock: X= -.05445 Y= -3.7152 -1. Radial Stock X= -.12224 Y= -3.70936
@emillewis8309 8 күн бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage Pushing the tool away at the start is a very useful tip even if its a small amount. Thank you!
@dhiganazsonu92 10 күн бұрын
Good video Kevin, I got out something else that is also a useful tool out of the video, which is turning on only the setup which you are looking at and automatically turn off the other setups. It helps when you are doing multiple ops on the same fixture and you don’t end up mixing the two parts.
@adambergendorff2702 10 күн бұрын
Excellent video! I too appreciated seeing the continue rest machining button.
@murrayedington 10 күн бұрын
"Continue rest machining" is a great step forward. Used to have to export the body from the simulation to create the stock for the next op, which was a PITA. Nice to see the process demonstrated! FWIW, you forgot to chamfer the hole for the (last) threaded hole....
@MechanicalAdvantage 8 күн бұрын
I didn't forget. I just didn't feel like explaining. Because Fusion uses the tap drill size for threaded holes, you can't just apply your chamfer to that edge of the solid. There is some math that has to be used to get the size of the chamfer you want after the hole is tapped. So I just chose not to do it in the video so I didn't have to explain.
@lilchirp4846 7 күн бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage or sometimes you can spot drill deep enough so it’s chamfered after drilling and tapping
@MarcPilon 10 күн бұрын
Your explanations make from a "not so obvious" topic a process easy to understand and apply. Appreciated.
@bluehandsvideo 10 күн бұрын
Great video Kevin. Thanks!!! I'll be back to watch it again when I actually do another project. I might actually do more than one this year.....as opposed to the one project in the last 2 years. lol This info will definitely help. :)
@MrRctintin 10 күн бұрын
Nice one Kev, great to see you back making great content (even if it’s in Banana measurements 😁)
@tdg911 10 күн бұрын
I always wondered how to do this using several setups while maintaining from preceding setups. I tend to get the "Continue Rest Machining: Cannot verify that the stock is transferred from the previous setup for rest machining. Verify that the model selections in both setups are the same." warning. I am assuming the wrong body is being selected. Cannot figure out how to get rid of that warning message. Great video again. Much gratitude
@travisguilbeau8404 9 күн бұрын
So what’s causing your issue is the body you’re selecting for your body when you’re setting up your “setup” as you go you have to make sure each setup has that same body as its “body”, does that make sense to you?
@tdg911 9 күн бұрын
@ I understand that but I was following Kevin’s example by inserting the same object multiple times for multiple setups and still get the same error. In Kevin’s example he is selecting another instance of the same component without any error. I know I am doing something wrong. I know can I save the first setups last operation as a mesh but I am missing something.
@travisguilbeau8404 9 күн бұрын
@ I will try to replicate it once I’m in front of my computer.
@tdg911 9 күн бұрын
@ I tried several times all resulting the same. I generally don’t have any issues with multiple setups and rest machining from proceeding setup but I would like to have my second and third setup in the vise for more accurate simulation for my machine setup
@travisguilbeau8404 9 күн бұрын
@@tdg911ok this might mean nothing, but does it matter if he added the components by dragging them or by inserting them VS using a linear pattern from the first body then just flipping the other parts in the orientation needed?
@Todestelzer 10 күн бұрын
18:03 shouldn’t be the lead in radius 0 too? Should be a smoother tool path.
@hermanhuge6109 11 күн бұрын
super helpful! Thank you!
@kenc1547 14 күн бұрын
I am working on something similar, except i only want the extruded square object while keeping the curvature of the cylinder on the intersection between the two object. How can I do that? Thank you
@Fubar12341 20 күн бұрын
A Very useful tutorial .Thank you so much.
@MikalBrowning 25 күн бұрын
Op, I think the post-processing export is a paid feature 😂 These people. I'm going to FreeCad
@naasehvnishmaJH87 26 күн бұрын
BEST FUSION INSTRUCTION VIDS ....bar none. Concise, clear, with detailed examples. Thank you!
@CNCMachinistEducationNetwork 26 күн бұрын
is the Syil capable of hookup on Single Phase?
@MechanicalAdvantage 26 күн бұрын
I believe there is one control that can be single phase, but almost all machines require 3 phase.
@CNCMachinistEducationNetwork 26 күн бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage Haas TM and Mini Mills can do Single phase or 3 phase. I think its all about HP /rpm of spindle. The TL Haas Lathe also. Fadals can be setup single phase.
@CNCMachinistEducationNetwork 26 күн бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage what phase converter do you have?
@CNCMachinistEducationNetwork 26 күн бұрын
It threw me for a loop at first but It may be more beneficial. Just got used to previous commands will take a little time.
@MechanicalAdvantage 26 күн бұрын
Stay tuned for the near future. I may have an update to bring you on this. How is that for a teaser? :)
@CNCMachinistEducationNetwork 26 күн бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage I didnt see much from Fusion on this - Ill check the june or July updates again.
@MechanicalAdvantage 26 күн бұрын
@@CNCMachinistEducationNetwork They did a poor job and didn't document it. I think with the feedback they received, that won't happen again.
@MikalBrowning 27 күн бұрын
People really need to update these Fusion Tutorial videos. A LOT can change in 7 years
@LightOfGodMfg 29 күн бұрын
Wow! Just wow! This was an amazing video. I want to get into programming and this was just so exciting to watch.
@danielshedd8062 Ай бұрын
what about the off center holes? can you go over how to accomplish these on a lathe with live tooling
@cluebin8398 Ай бұрын
You need to set your units to "thou", since that's the units you imperial hold-outs actually converse in. You know your unit is the wrong one when you have to divide it into thousands to get the actual base unit you are working in. Using inches for mechanical work is like using miles for house framing. Other than the cringe use of inches, that was an awesome tutorial :)
@MechanicalAdvantage Ай бұрын
When your country rules the free world, we'll use whatever units you want. Until then, inches ;-) Glad you found it helpful.
@cluebin8398 Ай бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage FYI, I'm an American living in America. Inches is great in the scale range from furniture to building construction. Below that it makes no sense. Having to have two duplicate sets of sockets, wrenches and hex keys for two systems of units is equally retarded and a waste of tool drawer space. The rest of the world figured this out in the 70s and switched away from rando units based on a kings body parts.
@MechanicalAdvantage Ай бұрын
@ What country did you move to?
@cluebin8398 Ай бұрын
@@MechanicalAdvantage Bro, I live in Ohio, working as an engineer in a company where the vast majority of mechanical designs are done in metric. Not everyone clings to Freedom Units (TM)
@MechanicalAdvantage Ай бұрын
@@cluebin8398 Sorry, thought you said you moved. Not sure where I came up with that. I just don't see either as a big hang up. In the US, imperial is far more widely used. If we changed, I wouldn't be upset about it, but I don't see it happening anytime soon. Just the amount of money required to change signs in the US would be billions and billions of dollars.
@jamesrushton3368 Ай бұрын
Thanks so much
@martindekker8203 Ай бұрын
how does the cnc know where G55 and G56 will be on the machine?
@daveyJ213 Ай бұрын
Very Cool! I learned some new techniques for assembling joints. Thanks for posting this video.
@oscarbustos3241 2 ай бұрын
Hello, I am really finding your videos helpfull. Im currently programming on camworks, but I want to jump to Fusion 360. Im working with a FADAL 15XT, do you recommend me to switch cause I dont know if fusion has the postp for that old machine. Thank you for the quality videos
@MechanicalAdvantage 2 ай бұрын
You can find a list of posts supported by Fusion here cam.autodesk.com/hsmposts? There is a Fadal post. I would be happy to work one on one with you to create a test program and then if you need more help after, that is a service I can provide from you from my website. www.mechanicaladvantage.com/schedule-now
@techsup3992 2 ай бұрын
Awesome!! learned more in 17min then the last month!! ..and yes agreed...MORE VIDEOS please 😊!! subscribed Thankyou
@robhughes-games5851 2 ай бұрын
Has this been updated at all?
@MechanicalAdvantage 2 ай бұрын
@@robhughes-games5851 yes. It’s now called continue rest machining and is automatic.
@oscarbustos3241 2 ай бұрын
Loved the video!
@StellaDamascus-yw6pn 2 ай бұрын
Hello, Kevin. I have a project and I've been trying to press down a shape from my object, but it's not working. Please help me.
@lemonamnesia8561 2 ай бұрын
Good video 🤙🏾
@dna2838 2 ай бұрын
God bless you for this video, you help me a lot, thank you!
@RenCraft-Uniques 2 ай бұрын
This is a great video, really good. But the sound of throat clearing was gross. Otherwise excellent.
@MechanicalAdvantage 2 ай бұрын
You know what my specialty is? Cad/cam. I’m not a video editor. I’m not a professional presenter. Sorry. I don’t have time to make everything perfect.
@ImDiabolos 2 ай бұрын
It worked for me, if u struggle at the end with the paramatic's look for 'thename'_1 Fusion made that for me but when i edit the jaws open
@rolandescobar4084 2 ай бұрын
SUBSCRIBED!!!! THANK YOU!!!
@olafmarzocchi6194 2 ай бұрын
Some stuff is fast, some is slow. I'm modeling a perforated grille in a truncated cone shape with rounded edges using therefore "emboss" to morph the pattern seamlessly from front face to sides. It should be quick but my i7-4770 (mid-2013) really struggles with it, also because this fonrt-to-side morph cannot be used with "pattern or features", but the pattern needs to be in the sketch which I emboss. Otherwise yes, specs are surprisingly quite irrelevant.
@thegreysmith8796 2 ай бұрын
Thanks