Please use Perry Ann Norton for voice over

Please use Perry Ann Norton for voice over

Please use Perry Ann Norton for voice over

Please use Perry Ann Norton for voice over

Please use Norton Perry Ann

who that?

I feel like there is one aspect of Steven Hawking's life that was skipped over lol

Good movie to give some basic idea of reality. The graphics of the moving train with the outside observer seems messy to me. I've seen this phenomena explained in other movies and when corectly animated it makes a lot of sense. But here I've got lost even having an idea what this experiment shows.

The answer is your mother's gigantic ass

Stahhhhp with the supervoid 😭 I am so scared of empty space. (kidding. i mean i am terrified of open spaces, but thank you for describing the böotes void, it's a really cool concept)

Ai version of Usain Bolt🤯🤯🤯

Best intro ever

I discovered the black hole which is next to earth! It's in my wallet and I call it Government A38.😁

.

The J1407b planet was proven to not exist

Is this the same voice talent that I watched narrate a Halo game documentary? I can't remember what it was called but your voice is identical I would bet money on you voicing a halo doc I watched in the last few years or so

Hawkings WAS an inspiration. Pity about the whole Epstein's Island thing

This topic is fascinating!

The Big Bang was flat !!!!

Albert Einstein’s last words on his death 💀 bed 🛌 was PLEASE GROW FOOD FRIENDS

Imagine the Apple 🍏 then imagine you taking care of the apple seeds 🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴🪴 then imagine an Orchard 🎄🎄🎄🎄🎄🎄🎄🎄🎄🎄 If you can see it in your personal evolution for the future Then you can create time for the trees to grow in the future 🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍎🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍋‍🟩🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏🍏

If the whole black hole universe idea is right then the great attractor is the singularity right?

why the f are you using 'numbers' as a comparison for what ever you are talking about. stupid channel with no knowledge and AI garbage

💫💥💫💥💫💥💫💥

As satellites became capable of launching telescopes into space? Huh? I’m dumbfounded a little before 17:20. You got me finally. I thought it was going to be some math.

Thanks!

I met Dirac in person years ago. He gave a speech already in his 90's. Glad he is brought in here. I looked him up and since it was 1968 in Florida he was not that old. I was 20 so he seemed much older to me. Now I am old!

The Heisenberg Uncertainty explanation has long been debunked. What you're talking about with time-energy Uncertainty principle is 1. a very poorly defined concept because there is no Time Operator to begin with, and 2. a leftover mess from perturbation theory, at best, which is a mathematical trick, not some deeper, physical concept. This is not a "key example" of QM or its complexity, it's just a very bad explanation of a mathematical trick. The real reason for Hawking radiation (and the only reason): the curvature of space affects creation/annihilation operators in quantum field theory. Saying anything else is just wrong, and this misinformation has been spread for decades - even Hawking himself regretted this analogy. And only this curvature idea matches with the Unruh effect - which is the acceleration equivalent of Hawking radiation, i.e. an accelerating observer sees a thermal bath of particles in a vacuum. In GR, acceleration and curvature of spacetime are the same thing, so Quantum Fields for an accelerating observer should behave the same way as in a curved spacetime, i.e. radiation.

Seems unlikely inflation stopped. Seems likely there are other universes spawned from the inflationary field. But seems unlikely that quantum forces playing out over billions of years could result in parallel universes with shared histories. That would be possible if they shared the same instant and were part of the same wave function like Everett suggested. This seems more probable, pun?, to me. now. I can see why Sean Carroll takes this view.

it is very misleading to say it only takes 3 numbers to describe a black hole after discussing the surface of the moon. the correct answer to this little riddle is actually the number of plank sized units of area that can be contained on the surface of the horizon, like a projection, each of which being 1 bit of information

thank you. my consciousness expanding is most pleasurable.

Sun's Event Horizon [μm Per meter (μm / m)] × [G (m³ / kg × s²)] × [Sun's Mass (kg)] / [Radius (m)]² = [Sun's Gravity Well (μm / s²)] Sun's Gravity At Sun's Surface: [1,000,000 μm / m)] × [6.67 × 10⁻¹¹ m³ / kg × s²] × [2 × 10³⁰ kg] / [.007 × 10¹¹ m]² = [275,383,142 μm / s²] Planet Order / Astronomical Unit (AUs) : Sun's Acceleration Due To Gravity Sun's Surface: 275,383,142 μm / s² Mercury: 39,792 μm / s² Venus: 11,393 μm / s² Earth (1 AU): 5,960.6 μm / s² Mars: 2,568.4 μm / s² 2 AU: 1,490 μm / s² Ceres: 782.09 μm / s 3 AU: 662.29 μm / s² 4 AU: 372.54 μm / s² 5 AU: 238.43 μm / s² Jupiter: 220.05 μm / s² 6 AU: 165.57 μm / s² 7 AU: 121.65 μm / s² 8 AU: 93.135 μm / s² 9 AU: 73.588 μm / s² Saturn: 64.917 μm / s² 10 AU: 59.606 μm / s² 11 AU: 49.261 μm / s² 12 AU: 41.393 μm / s² 13 AU: 35.270 μm / s² 14 AU: 30.411 μm / s² 15 AU: 26.492 μm / s² 16 AU: 23.284 μm / s² 17 AU: 20.625 μm / s² 18 AU: 18.397 μm / s² 19 AU: 16.511 μm / s² Uranus: 16.167 μm / s² 20 AU: 14.902 μm / s² 21 AU: 13.516 μm / s² 22 AU: 12.315 μm / s² 23 AU: 11.268 μm / s² 24 AU: 10.348 μm / s² 25 AU: 9.537 μm / s² 26 AU: 8.818 μm / s² 27 AU: 8.176 μm / s² 28 AU: 7.603 μm / s² 29 AU: 7.088 μm / s² 30 AU: 6.623 μm / s² Neptune: 6.588 μm / s² 31 AU: 6.203 μm / s² 32 AU: 5.821 μm / s² 33 AU: 5.473 μm / s² 34 AU: 5.156 μm / s² 35 AU: 4.866 μm / s² 36 AU: 4.599 μm / s² 37 AU: 4.354 μm / s² 38 AU: 4.128 μm / s² 39 AU: 3.919 μm / s² Pluto: 3.819 μm / s²

10 minutes in and you have still yet to even address the title

9:50 typo

Great video. Could this black hole be a 4d object on our 3d reality?

whois watching this in 2027 after the WW3 was over?»

Monsters are lurking in the Observable Universe. This is far more terrible, farmore powerful. A Mysterious Video reflecting Images of the Mysterious Observable Universe, Galaxies, Planets, Nebulae and many more. Love the Subject with excitement and wonder. 🇮🇳

Golf balls...

❤🌠✅

Plato is actually his wrestling nickname. Not referring to the WWE ofc but competing in games that were similar to the Olympics and he was actually quite good I think it was his wrestling coach who gave him that nickname - as mentioned on account of his broad shoulders and chest.

What would happen if you stayed near a black hole, then having a very very long stick which you would stick into the black hole and start stirring?

The Electric Charge (Q) Of A Black Hole (Or Any Object, For That Matter) Can Be Expressed As: Q = n × e Where: ● Q = Electric Charge (In Coulombs, C) ● n = Number Of Excess Electrons (Negative Charge) Or Protons (Positive Charge) ● e = Elementary Charge (1.602 × 10^−19) C Explanation: ● If n > 0: The Black Hole Has A Net Positive Charge Because There Are More Protons Than Electrons. ● If n < 0: The Black Hole Has A Net Negative Charge Because There Are More Electrons Than Protons. In The Context Of Black Holes: ● The Electric Charge Q Contributes To The Reissner-Nordström Metric For Charged Black Holes, Affecting Their Spacetime Geometry. ● Most Astrophysical Black Holes Are Expected To Have A Negligible Net Charge Because Any Significant Charge Would Quickly Attract Opposite Charges From The Surrounding Environment, Neutralizing It. The Earth On The Other Hand, Has A Negative Surface Charge And Is Surrounded By A Positively Charged Ionosphere. 1. Earth's Net Charge ● On A Global Scale, The Earth Has An Equal Number Of Protons And Electrons, Making It Electrically Neutral Overall. ● Any Significant Net Charge Would Cause The Earth To Attract Or Repel Charged Particles From The Surrounding Environment, Quickly Neutralizing It. 2. Earth's Surface Charge ● The Earth's Surface Carries A Small Negative Charge. This Is Due To Processes Such As: ● The Separation Of Charges In The Atmosphere. ● Lightning Discharges. ● Movement Of Ions In The Earth's Environment. ● The Total Negative Charge On The Earth's Surface Is Approximately: Q(earth) ≈ -5 ×10^5 Coulombs (C) 3. The Global Electric Circuit ● The Earth Is Surrounded By An Electrically Conducting Atmosphere, With A Positively Charged Ionosphere About 50-1,000 km Above The Surface. ● This Forms A Global Electric Circuit, Maintained By Processes Such As Thunderstorms And Lightning, Which Transfer Charge Between The Earth's Surface And The Ionosphere. 4. Why Does The Earth Stay Charged? ● The Earth's Surface Charge And The Ionosphere Create A Potential Difference Of About 200,000 - 300,000 Volts. ● This Electric Field Is Maintained By Atmospheric Currents And Charged Particle Interactions, Such As Cosmic Rays And Solar Wind. The Earth Is Electrically Neutral Overall, But It Has A Negative Surface Charge Of Approximately -5 ×10^5 C. This Charge Plays A Key Role In Earth's Global Electric Circuit And Interactions With The Surrounding Space Environment.

inside white hole is a black hole 😂

LOL programmer here. Not watching the video just commenting on the thumbnail. The ones and zeroes should be on top as they are an abstraction of everything that would be below it. Rather paradoxal.

If quantum mechanics doesn’t show there is a God, I don’t know what will.

If black holes do have such irreducible parameters, why don't we put them in Standard Model with all the rest fundamental particles?

Thank you for yet another fantastic video! You guys do incredible work, and this made for great listening while I did some chores this morning. God be with you out there, everybody. ✝️ :)

black stuff?

Is it just me, or do his videos feel like a lot of nothing??