Skoda Scala 1.0 TSI 115 PS CITY fuel consumption economy real test mpg l/100 km traffic jam Škoda

[@jerry_od_bizona]

To compare 1.0 110hp dsg avg 6.2l after 3,5k km. City consumption in Poznan 7,5l (distance 7km, cold engine, AC).

[@robertp7917]

I have Seat Ibiza , the same engine and power. Mostly city driving, and sometimes around. After 19000 km average consumption is 6,7 ltr/100 km. To go below 6 ltr in city almost not possible. And the DSG is very jerky in City. At motorway with 140km/h , around 7,2-7,5. The same like 1.5 TSI. Only on normal roads with speed max 100km/h I can get 4->5 ltr/100.

[@1001cars]

You probably have 1.0 110 HP, right? The 115 HP version is significantly more efficient. The difference is not very big, but it is measurable.

[@robertp7917]

@@1001cars 115 HP, 2019

[@1001cars]

Oh, I forgot about such version. Definitely what you have is sth. else comparing to what they have released last year. When I tested Fabia with the previous engine it was much harder to achieve anything below 6,0 l/100 km. Still, your results are good taking into consideration which version of engine you have.

[@robertp7917]

@@1001cars Correct, anyway I like Ibiza, in my opinion underrated in Poland. But next Ibiza I will choose 1.5 TSI., if Seat still keep this engine option.

[@1001cars]

@@robertp7917 I agree :) 1.5 TSI is much stronger and the consumption is... almost the same

[@ismailamir6093]

Hello, I just bought a Scala with the same engine. In the city I am at more than 8 L/100 (average journey of 14 km), do I not know how to drive, or is the car new (300 km in total)

[@1001cars]

Why not both? :) Definitely, the car with low mileage usually has high fuel consumption. Check it when your car will have around 2000 km :)

[@ismailamir6093]

@@1001cars ok, thanks

[@m-ots-w1]

1.0 ecoboost forda jest ekonomiczniejszy, bo ma ACT i mild. Do tego można odblokować overboost na 15 sekund ASO to robi jak uśmiechniesz się. Ogólnie już nigdy nie chcę żadnego 1.0 R3, minimum to R4.

[@ellypsis603]

absolutely terrible

[@1001cars]

what is terrible?

[@farzad6560]

The too much consumption, of course!

[@noelvliegenthart7858]

@@farzad6560 Too much? It's doing around 17km/L in a family car and for a petrol thats pretty good

[@qbaaa54]

5.6l @ 23km/h is bad?! I've never seen non-hybrid petrol car with better mpg. And even most phevs when not charged do worse.

[@ellypsis603]

@@qbaaa54 yes it is bad, the 1.5 tsi with 150hp does better, so for a 3 cylinder and that power, the ratio is terrible.

[@счастье33]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/pZWbcqGnid92ja8si=535PKpWwjw5OJ9ZO&t=191 - почему впереди горит красный сигнал светофора, а вы ускоряетесь? Вам следовало отпустить газ примерно на 3:08 и двигаться накатом! Это лишь один пример, но он показывает, что ваша техника вождения далека от экономичной, поэтому при вашем стиле вождения машины без гибридной составляющей будут показывать более низкий результат, чем могли бы при разумном вождении.

[@1001cars]

Type it in other language, I will try to answer.

[@piotrk1722]

@@1001cars you shouldnt talk to russian at all. They even dont have such cars