101 Facts About Dinosaurs

Salutations motherfactors! Today we’re going back in time to look into the world of some of the largest and most savage creatures that have ever walked on our delicate earth. He may not be Chris Pratt in Jurassic World, but Sam is here to tell you 101 Facts About Dinosaurs.
► Subscribe to 101 Facts Here: bit.ly/1MtNBJD
► Follow 101 Facts on Twitter: / 101facts1
► Follow us on Instagram: www.instagram....

[@aidanfellers8227]

Slight Corrections: Tyrannosaurus rex hasn’t been 100% confirmed to be completely scaley. The skin impressions that were found/hypthosized to be located around the feet and the base of the tail, parts of the body we already knew were scaley. And unlike what most people will tell you, feathers and scales can exist on the same animal, this is the case with every bird in existence. So Tyrannosaurus rex would have likely had a sort of feather “vest” that reached from the base of the snout all the way to its back and likely covered the arms as well. (This isn’t much of a correction) dilophosaurus didn’t have a frill or spit any sort of toxin, however you forgot to mention the real dilophosaurus was also about 3x bigger than the one portrayed in JP. Many dinosaurs likely did indeed make mumbles with their mouths closed, but they also had many other forms of closed mouth vocalization. An example of this is parasaurolophus, which had a long hollow crest on its head that connected to its nasal chambers. Scientists have 3D printed this skull and then blows air through it, and it generated a sort of deep sounding trombone. Dinosaurs could mumble, moan, hiss, lightly growl, trumpet, and horn to communicate with each other. Most dinosaurs are in fact terrestrial, but saying that if it swims it isn’t a dinosaur is simply inaccurate. What is and isn’t a dinosaur is based mostly on their hip structure and limb position, with dinosaurs holding their legs underneath them and true reptiles having their legs splayed out. Even creature closely related to dinosaurs such as crocodilians and pterosaurs were only technically not dinosaurs due to their hips and limb position and divergence from the dinosaur family tree so early on that the first dinosaur hadn’t even evolved yet. examples of swimming dinosaurs were spinosaurus, halzkaraptor, and penguins. Everything else seems about right, great video. (Edit): I forgot to mention dracorex isn’t its own species. It’s actually the juvenile stage of a pachycephalosaurus, many dinosaurs changed their body through their whole lives, and almost none of them would be scaled down versions of the adults.

[@connorvaughn7968]

"stegosauruses had a brain the size of a walnut" *Shows caption that says "I love jersey shore". SPOT ON MATE, SPOT ON!

[@hao5829]

LOL THIS DESERVE MORE LIKE.

[@boymom3884]

It basically has 2 brains but the other one is like his or her reflexes

[@bumblebeetlebee5187]

Honestly I can’t tell the difference 🤔🤔🤔🤔🤔

[@brubber3326]

"A COIN WITH THE PICTURE OF A STEGOSAURUS ON IT" *shows a coin with a pachyrhinosaurus* NAILED IT

[@Groundsey]

My ten year old self is gonna judge you so hard if you make any mistakes

[@meatballjosh]

StuntProductions2012 They made 2 as far as i can tell.

[@richie_23]

he pronounced dilophosaurus, micropachycephalosaurus and kosmoceratops wrong

[@ffreeze9924]

Mine has stabbed him repeatedly. My modern self is throwing rocks at its computer

[@angelicwarrior118]

Micropachycephalosaurus is a ceratopsian by the way.

[@venomissocute3448]

channel by me It’s hard to tell, but when he said Cannotaurus, I THINK he meant Carnotaurus.

[@abelmantor2449]

Been a huge dinosaur fanboy ever since my childhood days. Still love 'em now.

[@manmeetsingh412]

Okay, I need to address something. That T. Rex skin impression is thought to be from the foot of the organism. Feet and ankles are generally areas where dinosaurs didn't have features. Just because if skin impression was scaly, doesn't mean the whole creature was scaly. T. Rex was most likely cover with feathers. So about that, you just triggered me. ADDITION: Velociraptors did have feathers 100%. Velociraptor fossils have been found with feather impressions ANOTHER ADDITION: Dracorex has been proven to not be its own species. It's been proven that "Dracorex" was actaully a young Pachycephhlosaurus

[@thehalobrony9050]

there were found some scales on T-rex on its leg, underside on its but, and under the tale, all of the 3 specimens were the size of a nickel. not a compelling argument to make if someone wants T-Rex to be only scaly. those are also the spots that are highly believed to not be scaly on T-Rex, just like ostriches. faninating is'n it?

[@harrisonhulker5711]

Glad to see intelligent people in the comments

[@one-clawedtheropod1567]

I support you! I’m a HUGE paleontology-geek myself and I like this. But, Tyrannosaurus probably still had scales… sorry to break it to ya.

[@davidc5820]

Ross?!

[@maxxmason723]

Ugh my Autistic brain loves you yes I love the information

[@poppyraima5342]

Couple things (yes, we're going to do this): *#4 (****1:28****):* While correct in addressing the idea that not all Mesozoic reptiles were dinosaurs, there's a couple errors with what's described. Firstly, the term archosaurs (Archosauria) is a group that includes crocodilians (and their myriad of extremely diverse extinct relatives), pterosaurs (all of which actually did have feathers or some sort of downy-like fuzz), and dinosaurs (including birds), and a swath of lesser-studied animals. As such, neither ichthyosaurs nor nothosaurs were archosaurs; the former are considered to be more closely related to lizards than anything else, while nothosaurs are currently considered to be most closely related to turtles, which themselves are considered to be the next closest relatives to archosaurs and together form the clade Archelosauria. Secondly, the statement "if it's flying or swimming, it ain't a dino" doesn't really hold up since we have Mesozoic examples of dinosaurs that both flew (various birds at least) and swam (chiefly spinosaurs, which seem to have been semi-aquatic to the point that they were spending as much time in the water as modern crocodiles do). *#38 (**13:24**):* More of an aside, but it's recently been revealed the traditional Saurischian-Ornithischian divide may not necessarily be the most accurate way to reconstruct the dinosaur family tree. The traditional method groups theropods and sauropods as lizard-hipped (Saurichians) and basically all other dinosaur groups as bird-hipped (Ornithischians), but a paper published earlier this year suggests a revamped grouping based on a number of other features that results in splitting one group of early theropods (herrerasaurs) and sauropods into a redefined Saurischia while ornithischians and the remaining theropods (birds included) form a new group called Ornithoscelida. The paper and subsequent studies might even indicate that ornithischians are themselves actually a subgroup of theropods, but birds are still descended from "lizard hipped" ancestors... So yeah, science is getting more and more complicated. *#54 (**18:28**):* Ah, the _T. rex_ integument debate of 2017... So, the long-and-short of it is that the recent paper that made people run the "T-REX WASN'T FEATHERED!!!" headlines was of course somewhat overblown in its significance. Most of the remains described in the paper had been known about by paleontologists and the general paleo-community for some time, but this was the first time they'd been formally studied and described. Furthermore, the prevailing hypothesis in recent years is that dinosaur species likely had a variety of coverings; we know from both extinct and modern examples (i.e., birds) that that it is possible to find scales, skin, feathers, and keratinous structures all on a single animal. This said, most of the tyrannosaur scales that we can confidently assign to a specific body part fit fairly neatly onto regions that are commonly thought to have been scaly anyway, even on feathered dinosaurs, such as the tail, legs, and underbelly. What's more, some of the tyrannosaur scales might not even be scales at all, but rather skin similar to that of elephants or even a rooster's comb. Even if they are all scales that actually covered the entirety of the body, we have modern examples of birds that regularly grow and shed feathers over small scales (like ptarmigans), and even if there were no feathers at all, tyrannosaurs _still_ wouldn't look obviously scaly because of how tiny the scales are (barely a few millimeters across) and so you wouldn't notice they had scales unless you got up close to the animal. (By which point, you'd probably have been chomped on.) *#55 (**18:50**):* The notion that chickens are the birds most closely related to _T. rex_ doesn't make any sense and is effectively false for a number of reasons. Firstly, chickens are not the most basal ('primitive') modern bird group; ostriches, cassowaries, and other ratites are, so if anything they are the most closely related to extinct non-avian dinosaurs. Secondly, tyrannosaurs are not ancestral to birds; in fact, they're pretty far removed from them on the branch of the family tree that includes all the feathered theropods (coelurosaurs). They're more like 128th cousins millions of years removed. Finally, this notion is once again the result of pop science articles misinterpreting the actual results of the paper they were covering; the study in question compared a small sample of proteins obtained from a tyrannosaur fossil to those of chickens, ostriches, and a select few other species (mostly mammals, reptiles, and amphibians) that are commonly found in genomics databases -- crocodilians weren't even available in the given database -- so the fact that they found the most similarities to chickens and ostriches (and moreso chickens just because those are better studied) shouldn't necessarily be surprising, but the headlines misinterpreted the study and blew it out of proportion. *#59 (**20:00**):* While thermoregulation was a common and popular theory for decades, more recent studies of stegosaur plates seem to point more towards a purely display function. The blood vessels -- which were thought to supply the plates with blood for cooling -- are more akin to those found on the bones of animals with vascularized keratin-covered display structures, and if the plates were indeed covered with keratin, then they would've been fairly ineffective at serving any sort of thermoregulatory purpose. *#70 (**23:20**):* The idea of centuries-old dinosaurs is a bit of an outdated one at this point that was initially based on the growth rate of ectothermic ('cold-blooded') reptiles. However, we now know that dinosaurs were all at least closer to -- if not true -- endotherms ('warm-blooded') based on studies of their bones, and many species (particularly large herbivores) reached adult size within only a decade or so, and were sexually mature within only their first few years of life. For instance, a large 'duck-billed' dinosaur like _Edmontosaurus_ reached sexual maturity at only ~3 years old, at which point it was about the size of a cow, and reached old age at around 10 years old, at which point it was nearing 50 feet/15 meters and weighed several tons. The oldest dinosaur we currently have an age for is actually "Sue" the _T. rex,_ who was only nearing 30 years yet was already suffering from arthritis and other maladies that typically come with old age in wild animals. So instead of being 300-yeear old timers, dinosaurs seemed to have lived fast and died young. *#82 (**27:08**):* Nothing necessarily wrong with this, but I implore anyone down about dinosaurs not-roaring to look up a cassowary booming, and then imagine an animal several times more massive than that producing a similar sound. Arguably creepier and more intimidating. *#84 (**27:42**):* The picture posted here is not a _Kosmoceratops._ *This* is a _Kosmoceratops:_ nhmu.utah.edu/sites/default/files/kosmoceratops%20rendering_2.jpg *#91 (**29:45**):* _Velociraptor_ isn't just theorized to have had feathers, there's actual hard evidence in the form of quill knobs on their arms, which are attachment points for large wing feathers. Also, even though none of this was known at the time the film was being produced, the _Jurassic Park_ raptors more closely resemble the recently-discovered/described _Dakotaraptor_ in both size and general shape, while _Utahraptor,_ though still large, has been found to have been quite heavily built and stocky, with an oddly-shaped lower jaw. *#98 (**31:34**):* That is a _Pachyrhinosaurus,_ very different creature and actually lived in what is now Canada, unlike _Stegosaurus._ *#101 (**32:27**):* Interestingly, _Dracorex_ is currently thought to have not been its own species, but rather a juvenile _Pachycephalosaurus._ If this is indeed true (and it's currently where the evidence pretty strongly points), then the name _Dracorex hogwartsia_ is invalidated, and as per the rules of scientific taxonomy, the name cannot be used again to describe a different organism.

[@noodle_boy]

damn

[@dinosaurgaming8823]

Wow

[@slothboi1387]

Okay paleontologist

[@CitySlicker34]

*#101* same applies for the Stiggiemoloch (Stygimoloch is actual spelling) and could be a very young Pachey

[@keyblade280]

Poppy Raima too much time on your hands then mate

[@eonjetpretzel5901]

Chicken: my child will murder your family! Farmer: sure lol. Chicken edits dna, lays egg. A while later: a t-rex rampages through the nearby city.

[@amn2760]

Another fact: Dinosaurs originally means “fearfully-great lizards”. In addition, the word “dinosaur” wasn't existed yet because at first glance, paleontologist Richard Owen thought that they were fearfull reptiles despite being large. It wasn't until the 1890s that he realized that not all dinosaurs weren't just like scaredy cats, some of them were frightening and vicious. And so, Richard Owen decided to call such reptiles as Megalosaurus and Iguanodon in a family of reptiles called “dinosaurs” which means “terrible lizard”.

[@eapen7297]

NEEEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRRRRDDDDDDD!!!!

[@mrdinosaur9876]

Number 54 is wrong, they took skin samplings from the tail and leg, the are which was already to be known to not have feathers. This is because of the Tyrannosauruses' size it would of needed to radiate heat some how and so the t.rex couldn't of had feathers all over its body but had them in the torso area. It's like saying that a ostrich doesn't have feathers just by judging the whole skin by just the legs.

[@greblats]

YES SHE DOES, SHE IS LE LITTLE FLUFFY BEAST

[@greblats]

TAKING THE FEATHERS FROM A T REX IS LIKE DOING THIS TO A BEAR www.bing.com/images/search?view=detailV2&ccid=CIpyYhtq&id=0FBA5B68DA933512CE0F2218DCCE3B0FFB87D625&thid=OIP.CIpyYhtqN9pEHcC8VE7jSgEsDG&q=hairless+bear&simid=608048842754362911&selectedIndex=2&ajaxhist=0

[@EmilForsberg_GRYBO]

fussy rex love!!!

[@imaweedafty3481]

Nerd

[@EmilForsberg_GRYBO]

oof

[@ffreeze9924]

102: Dracorex is actually a young Pachycephalasaurus. 103: Birds are dinosaurs 103: velociraptor had wings, which it didn’t use to fly 104: all ceratopsids, such as Triceratops, most likely had quills on their tails 105: archaeopteryx was the first bird, and came into existence in the Jurassic period 106: birds are direct descendants of dinosaurs (not just loosely related) Don’t judge me if I got some spellings and facts wrong, I just wanted to add somethings to the video that it needed Edits: 102: not sure about 104: MOST ceratopsians. Scientists can’t be absolutely sure if ALL had quills 107: All dinosaurs had a feathered common ancestor called Kulindadromeas (don’t judge if I spelled it wrong)(correct me if new information comes up)

[@Blue_Anzu]

Archaeopteryx wasn't the first bird, it was the first bird-like dinosaur. It was a link between birds and dinosaurs

[@selenajarv8763]

Velociraptors used their "wings" for running or something like that

[@cowbe6336]

so your telling me, the bird that took a shit on my car was a dinosaur? fuck.

[@opalthediloalt9595]

I learned nothing... because I have a book with 100,000 facts XD, ok so I learned something...

[@OvAppolyon]

A small correction, or possibly expansion. Dimetrodon were Synapsids, in the same group as mammals, but a very early form of it.

[@useruseruseruser6777]

31:42 that picture is most definitely not a fucking stegosaurus

[@vaselinebakje]

i thought the same bro wtf hahaha

[@vaselinebakje]

more like a pachyrhinosaurus

[@Pilsnor]

*eats chicken” “Who is on top of the foodchain now!”

[@himalirathnayaka340]

I love you too

[@Cypresssina]

All those playing Ark just said, "F'ing troodon."

[@barrage9329]

lmfao i hate them

[@LordMaster1231]

'Archosaur' is pronounced Ark-o-saur

[@nanuqo2006]

Ark survival evolved confirmed

[@Karagianis]

#4 Correction, Icthyosaurs are not Archosaurs. Also, if it's flying and it has feathers then yes, it IS a dinosaur, because birds are actually small theropod dinosaurs. #9 Similarly, dinosaurs did not entirely go extinct with the KT event, because Birds. #71 Or just buy some chicken's eggs from the supermarket, chickens are birds, and therefor also dinosaurs.

[@SkyCinema]

Can't wait for the 2nd instalment of Jurassic World!

[@Dan89201]

AlltimeMovies butteseks

[@gechoman44iwantahippo]

Same

[@jakedebruin2246]

AlltimeMovies Jurassic world sucks, one of the worst movies ever! Stick with the original!

[@jakedebruin2246]

I lost all respect for the director after the movie.

[@nateanderson2675]

+Jake DeBruin did u not watch the movie and only watch the nostalgia critic's review? Or did u actually go see the movie?

[@KY.29]

“What do you want to be when you’re older?” -Them: A princess! -4 yr old me: A palaeontologist!

[@charlesjakesamadan4008]

Me: *A Dinosaur*

[@therider2050]

Me: GOKU

[@rami_ungar_writer]

101 Facts About: 1. Stephen King 2. Sailor Moon 3. Ballet 4. Cats

[@aurathedraak7909]

101 facts about horse dongs. But I do love dinosaur dongs.

[@ahmad-qz7hi]

I do have some criticisms of some of the points you did bring up here, some of them are very specific nitpicks, others are pointing out extremely obvious Scientific inaccuracies, here they are: 1. Dinosaurs were a lot less reptilian than pop culture might have you think, in fact most of the imagery in the video itself are very far from looking like most Dinosaurs, closest thing was the birds. We now know that most of them were covered in early feathered, also another little detail is that they aren't shrinkwrapped (as in you can notice that in a lot of the imagery you used, the depictions are literally skin wrapped around bones, which is not the case in animals) the type of scales and the eyes are also very reptilian, and they most likely had lips that covered their teeth. 2. Pterosaurs weren't feathered, but they had similar structures known as pycnophibers, hair like filaments that were actually closer to those of Dinosaurs than mammalian hair. 3. Birds are the descendants of a surviving species of theropods, not really _all_ theropods as you imply. 4. a thousand genera is a very small number, because of the rarity of fossilization of fossil animals, and the fact that a lot of them lived in areas were fossilization was impossibly rare, and how fast animals diversify, there's probably a lot more than just a thousand genera, in fact, a lot of the known Dinosaur genera are only known from 1 holotype specimen, some from even just one tooth. 5. It's hard to identify the "largest Dinosaur" but it was definitely a titanosaur, the difference between Argentinosaurus and other titanosaurs is very minimal, only mere centimeters. It's a bit of a nitpick, but it kind of annoyed me that it's not mentioned. 6. Actually, larger Dinosaurs are even less likely to fossilize, due to the fact that they're very large, their carcasses would be exposed to the elements, and scavengers, smaller DInosaurs on the other hand, would get fully preserved before they even rot in some cases, which is why large Dinosaur fossils are usually fragmentary, except in areas like the hell creek formation which has a bias towards fossilizing larger fossil animals. 7. Allosaurus isn't very Tyrannosaurus-like, a modern emu is closer to Tyrannosaurus than Tyrannosaurus is to Allosaurus, not only on a timescale, but also phylogenetically. 8. Tyrannosaurus is more famous probably because of how successful it was as a predator, for one it had one of the strongest bite-forces, most likely the strongest among all terrestrial animals, it also had binocular vision better than that of a hawk, it was generally thicker and more well-equipped for larger prey, etc. The amount of Tyrannosaurus fossils doesn't really have much of a contribution to that. 9. Sue is NOT the largest specimen, she is only the largest published specimen at about 12 meters in length, there were other specimens uncovered such as Celeste rex, and other specimens found along side it. 10. Tyrannosaurus was most likely covered in extensive feathers, the "latest research" are just news outlets over hyping scale impressions found on the Wyrex specimen, which were in areas that were already known to be scaly in most theropods, Tyrannosaurus is still feathered and would have had no reason to lose its feathers which are deeply ancestral to all coelurosaurs. The scaly areas on its body were not covered in reptilian scales, only archosaurian scales, which are nothing like what you're showing here and are a lot more like bird scales, or reticula. 11. The depictions seen in pop-culture are extremely inaccurate, the most accurate I can think of are the games Saurian, and Prehistoric Kingdom. Tyrannosaurus could not roar, did not have reptilian scales, and most are based on the Tyrannosaurus from Jurassic Park, who's anatomy is completely different from the actual animal. They also most likely had lips that cover their teeth. 12. If you think Carnotaurus arms are tiny... _check out Majungasaurus._ 13. Troodons were intelligent in comparison to other Dinosaurs, but they were still pretty stupid. 14. That age is very speculative, and I can only imagine it being attributed to Sauropods, which recently have been phylogenetically reclassified, and are most likely no longer Dinosaurs. 15. Judging by the position of the animals in the fossil, the Protoceratops was most likely the one attacking the Velociraptor. 16. They didn't "mumble with their mouths shut" the sounds they produced were more like crocodillian rumbles and hisses mixed with bird noises, something like this kzbin.info/www/bejne/fnWbcnyiop5qoqM&pbjreload=10 they might have been able to """roar""" (bird noises not mammalian roars like the ones in movies) but as theropods are ambush predators it doesn't make sense for them to roar at their prey. It also doesn't make sense for them to waste energy roaring at each other. 17. Ceratopsids don't have horns anyways, they are bones covered in keratin, unlike rhinoceroses for example whose horns aren't really formed of bone. 18. Jurassic Park's monsters are nothing like the real animals, they were extremely different from real Dinosaurs, the films' Dinosaur depictions were reduced to hyper aggressive bloodthirsty monsters which were also extremely inaccurate visually, and behavior wise. 19. Velociraptors weren't "theorized to have had feathers", ALL known dromaeosaurids did 100% have feathers, pennaceous feathers like these of modern day birds, and they had wings as well, nothing like the images you're showing. 20.The Jurassic Park Dilophosaurus was a lot more inaccurate than that, it was only a fraction of the size of the real animal, it lacked feathers, and was extremely shrinkwrapped, we also know it fed on fish, so it 100% was not venomous. 22. Unfortunately for Miss Rowling, Dracorex is now believed to be a juvenile Pachycephalosaurus. Rip.

[@keyblade280]

Tera The Feather Nazi fuck me I didn’t know you where actually going to list them

[@Nootasaur]

Video made 2 years ago Man: Fact 19 (starts coughing) Me: Covid-19 😐

[@grihingo8912]

The T-rex didn't have scales like a crocodile they had a more leathery texture. The scale specimens were very small so it is not proven that the T-rex were entirely covered in scales. Paleontologists didn't even believe that the T-rex entire body were covered in feathers.

[@emiliohidalgo5927]

Saaaaaaaadly it turns out Dracorex was most likely not an own genus, but rather a teenage-Pachycephalosaurus :/

[@lauch4562]

You know the stuff my friend. You have good potencial. Good studies finaly you also peaked it out

[@lemur88]

No the Dracorex was a juvenile pachy not a teenage. You’re thinking about the stigymoloch

[@frankalbe8996]

@Matteo Garibaldi An Urban Myth? Were in Southern Detroit do you hang out? Sarcasm aside, After millions of years, the diversity of "dinosaurs" must have been, logically, diverse in even "one" species. Perhaps they migrated like animals in Africa. That many years, to my mind, would involve many different strategies to survive. Feathers, or proto-feathers: Imagine the vermin that would infest species that were around for that long!! Itchy, itchy "dinosaurs". When a VERY close look is taken at the surrounding rock, I think that a "dinosaur" will reveal a whole little ecological system based on it. This would greatly effect the evidence left behind in the incredibley improbable evidence left in the fossil record.

[@Kay-kd4hy]

Greetings "Mother factors!" My heart sank to my stomach. Haha! That was hilarious.

[@meatballjosh]

Troodon is no longer a valid genus and the tyrannosaurus was never concluded to have had scales completely covering it's body.

[@greyideasthetheliopurodon4640]

Troodon is still valid. The 2017 study was misinterpreted by a blog. Two more studies raise suspicions about the 2017 study.

[@connorvaughn7968]

I thought Archaeologists studies Architecture from the past.

[@_charmander4710]

THIS IS BIAS! DINOSAURS HAD FEATHERS! GET OVER IT!!!

[@_charmander4710]

Clorox Bleach JURASSIC PARK FANBOY

[@Eggnog88]

If you actually kept up to date on the paleontological community, you wouldn’t be saying that dumb shit. So why don’t you shut your mouth and instead do some research instead of complaining.

[@michaelridgeway915]

Look tyrannosaurus Rex means Tyrant Lizard not Tyrant Bird so drop it

[@TimthePhilosiraptorExhale]

lol the meaning of a name of a dinosaur given to it by humans of a less learned era does not mean anything, nice try :)

[@idontknowwhattonamemyself5885]

@@michaelridgeway915 : / ....

[@lasemanamayor9396]

Pterosaurs didnt have feathers but they did posses pycnofibers

[@MS46532]

BUM BUM BUM BUM BUM BUM BUM BUM BUM BUM BUM BUM 101 FACTS ABOOOUUUT (JUSSIAC THEME SONG)

[@greysonheart5309]

thank you for clearing up the confusion between paleontology and archaeology i have no idea how often i have to explain that to people

[@TTTristan1]

Oh my god... As a former tortoise owner, tortoise banging everything they can walk over does sound like some of the special effects... especially the velociraptor "bark".

[@footylad6468]

Noticed he coughed on number 19? You know what I’m talking about

[@SuraimuWasTaken]

Ah yeah, watching this in 2021 and hearing the praise for J.K Rowling is just mwah! That aged like fine milk.

[@bethanyflarrety4656]

Why what happened

[@isaacdupaul937]

Loved the vid but you missed #75

[@braddersking6442]

There’s also a allosaurus that’s quite famous dubbed ‘big al’ and i believe is one of the most complete and has been found with the most injuries and disease than any other

[@kidsw3113]

Jurassic world was named that for the perpose of being a cool name

[@GoodVideos4]

Before the term 'dinosaur' they were called 'dragons'. Many of the dragons slain in medieval times could have been surviving dinosaurs. At Krakow, Poland, is a cave that according to legend had a dragon in medieval times. Scientists discovered dinosaur bones there that were in surprisingly good condition.

[@HOTD108_]

There were no dragons slain in medieval times. You're confusing reality with fiction.

[@TheAxebitten]

That cheetah joke made me giggle

[@TheTruePopeFrancis]

Great video! You really did your research well. But you did make one big mistake in fact 101. Dracorex didn't exist, it was just a juvenile Pachycephalosaurus.

[@ethansmith997]

I’m sorry to crush all the other potter heads out there, but dracorex Hogwartsia is actually most likely a juvenile pachysephilasaurus, with the bony spikes on the back of its head morphing into the dome as the animal matures. Similar to how Triceratops’ horns would go from curled as an infant to straight an adult

[@jessemaynard8193]

I'm a huge dinosaur geek/fanatic.

[@spagbol71]

who isn’t🤷

[@therider2050]

OK godzilla

[@joshuajackson4742]

LMAO "Don't fat shame me white boy" had me DEAD.

[@dawnerinmyers]

I love Dnosaurs

[@karengonzalez2887]

Garrjkm Herps was a little too cold outside the night

[@karengonzalez2887]

Garrjkm Herps has

[@onthelist8509]

Bring back the dinosaures! Make this world great again!

[@jacobjackson4928]

FACTS LMAO the T-Rex did have feathers we have found feather impressions and the yutyrannus had feathers so the T-Rex should as well not fully covering it but in parts like humans are related to apes and we have less hair.

[@noiceplams2299]

Jacob Cossaboon Even though yutyrannus was 9 metres long, it was an extremely distant relative of T rex so it was pretty unlikely that T rex had any hair like filaments. No I am not a crazy JP fan.

[@daubeny8071]

Noice Palms there is still a very good change tyrannosaurus had feathers

[@meatballjosh]

Noice Plams I am highly skeptical in regards to the skin impressions. It may not have been completely covered in feathers, but may have had a feathery cape.

[@nicklasmocander6658]

i think they only found scales from the belly leg and tail

[@nicklasmocander6658]

nope only foot and tail

[@hettyscetty9785]

I love this channel and dinosaurs so basically this video was happiness.

[@thehalobrony9050]

then you would love this guy on youtube : kzbin.info/door/OuWeOkMrq84u5LY6apWQ8Q?&ab_channel=TREYtheExplainer if you love dinosaurs even more then look at this playlist : kzbin.info/www/bejne/ioiapqx6Zc2Zp8k&ab_channel=thegeekgroup

[@paultravers8876]

Do 101 random facts as a video

[@bigpoppadawg]

Spinosaurus swam a lot

[@101Facts]

*What do you call a no-eyed dinosaur?*

[@generalgen9247]

101Facts Dave from altime 10

[@MnSakib007]

die 'no' sours?

[@silentcromie5208]

101Facts don't know tell me please and tell me ur instagram if u have one

[@andrewquinn144]

A doyouthinkhesawus

[@carathompson31]

Dnosaur

[@SerbonOfficial]

People need to start treating dinosaurs and other prehistoric creatures like animals,not movie monsters

[@normanprice8841]

Loved the vid very interesting

[@SwrveYT]

27:43 I’m sure that’s a Torosaurus ;)

[@MnSakib007]

awesome!!!!

[@masterofgaburincho]

I agree. Cool Agumon icon btw.

[@zyhs6942]

101 facts about germany

[@rabbiqa]

0:06 "scaly reptilians" 🤦‍♀️ *B O I* if you're gonna make a video on Dinosaurs don't start it off by calling them scaly. Most dinosaurs have feathers. Deal with it.

[@clarawonders4812]

I actually think it’s pretty cool that dinosaurs had feathers

[@henry-sarahmike-show8402]

Where is the Ankylosaur squad?

[@mustard9808]

Henry-Sarah Mike-Show Here!

[@EmilForsberg_GRYBO]

no No NO. t-rex had fethers. yeah they found scales on it but fethers and scales could easily exist next to each other. fethers need very specific conditions to fossilise. if we look at it's reletives we se (for exemple) uhtyranus (i think thats how you spell it) wich was covered in fethers head to... well their not sure mayby the feet or even the toes. just saying...

[@summermeeks813]

MelssuperC No.. i mean do a bit more research. It probably had some on its back or something but definitely not covered or a lot.

[@spore9581]

It's Yutyrannus and feathers not fethers

[@milchesarreal6964]

Carnotaurus: Has the smallest arms of any dinosaur Mononykus: Hold my ferns. (Geddit? Cuz of it's TINIER ARMS)

[@Bigfanm3new]

T rex was *FEATHERED* also it can't run

[@abegamers7304]

Bigfanm3new agreed

[@account8158]

They probably could run, do you see how thick their leg bones are, also they have air sacs and hollow bones making them a lot lighter then they look. Scientist have also found healing T. rex bites on dinosaurs such as tricerotops, anatosaur, and ankylosaur. That pretty much proves that T. rex likely actively hunted its prey. Also animals that big can't scavenge just do the little amount of food they would take in since it is rare to find a full corpse of the size that a tyrannosaur needed.

[@account8158]

Clorox Bleach First of all, this comment chain was dead two months ago and you honestly shouldn't have bothered commenting. Second of all, is you only made yourself look stupid by calling someone else stupid when what you were saying was wrong. T. rex pretty much has feathers somewhere on its body, seeing as both it ancestors, and its later descendants had feathers. Feathers is a trait that does not just disappear, then magically reappear, and American soil does not have the correct conditions like China to fossilize feathers and other soft tissue.

[@Christian-ez3iu]

Somewhere, huh?

[@Bigfanm3new]

are you talking to me?

[@donaldchapman8796]

love ur videos seen them alllll

[@siyacer]

Reptilian? hiss

[@janresendez7991]

101 facts about Sam 😂

[@JacobBite]

Good video but at least use scientifically accurate pictures next time

[@genjishimada4748]

Pat Moon yeah he tried but there weren't that many accurate pictures when he made this

[@nanuqo2006]

Yes, there was.

[@tech4net777]

Now I’m gonna watch this every time I come from school since it tells me more interesting facts about Dinosaurs! love it!

[@jesper__plays5662]

@101FACTS Do 101 facts about Stranger Things!

[@clubmichel9262]

but you didn't even mention trumposaurusrex

[@birdienator7377]

Please work on your pronunciation... it slightly triggers me

[@rosecah]

DINOSAUR1234576 he also needs to work on the facts

[@bigred2493]

Then don’t watch it if it bothers you so much

[@guardianverseproducts2914]

The real question is: DiD tHeY eVeR eXiSt?

[@billysbilbolag2050]

As a dinosaur nerd, the lack of mentioning the fact that a majority of scientists agree that basakly all dinosaurs had some sort of feathers triggers me (insert triggered meme gif here) Otherwise well done and good video

[@2VeryIceyGaming]

John Sjöberg love how you spell basically

[@blobbyfisherson7925]

2:29 illuminate confirmed 🚀

[@Karagianis]

#92 On the upside, real dilophosaurus was about twice the size it is in Jurassic park.

[@billuminaticatcipher7554]

>Terrible dragon >Bad dragon?

[@cap7387]

T. rex had a long coat of feathers on its back

[@charlotteisalwasyasafename6254]

I fall alseep to this video every night, I've never made it all the way through but I really like it

[@joshuajackson4742]

Only an imprint of the underbelly of the T-rex's body was found, and it is still thought that t-rex was covered in feathers.

[@rn-zu5ld]

Can we just say it wore a leather jacket

[@Archive1983]

Called em scaly reptilians and I dipped lmao.

[@Scrota]

Bri PLZ research more man I'm triggered about most facts that were wrong

[@mauriousb.]

The intro to #11 #22 and #69 of your videos always crack me up 🤣 oh and #64

[@rongpirson5250]

33:14 those impressions were smaller than a postcard on an animal 12 metres long, and in places that are scaly even in feathered dinos!!!!!!!!!!

[@tomsanfason4496]

is that a quote from trey the explainer

[@Rancord123]

Take a shot every time he says period!

[@sovietramen4003]

FITTHHH

[@Wolfiyeethegranddukecerberus17]

Ironic that the oldest known dinosaur means "new lizard". I think.

[@maireaddunphyandcianaliyah4908]

If its old how is it new????

[@TTTristan1]

Just thank evolution that t-Rex couldn't fly. Or velociraptors.

[@thehalobrony9050]

you can speculate that Velociraptor could glide from trees, it was just as tall as a turkey, discuverd in china and was fully coverd in feathers. If you want a big raptor to love, then look at Utahraptor and Dakotaraptor. they are BADASSES!

[@TTTristan1]

Well, fuck me with a sauropod femur... I'm not sure what's scarier, a swarm of gliding Velociraptors or one Utahraptor.

[@mrdinosaur9876]

Tristan Taylor I think you are mistaken for a microraptor, that could glide from trees

[@trigger_core]

theHaloBrony also feathers aren't a thing that was just found

[@nmheath03]

It's speculated by some scientist that deinonychus,a raptor bigger than velociraptor,could fly when young,though I'm not sure if this has been disproven.

[@Harrisen11]

I like how he said "go England!" When it showed the union jack (flag of the UK) which would be referring to the UK as a whole, not just England 😂

[@augustuswaddle469]

0:51 BIRDS THEY ARE BIRDS

[@Christian-ez3iu]

They are reptiles you fucknut.

[@Christian-ez3iu]

What exactly makes you think they are birds huh?

[@kopeyka22]

Comment that's below this one, I don't know maybe its the fact that we've found feathers and air sacs.

[@elliottcoleman8225]

Stopped watching the second he said "scaly reptilians" lmaooooo I'm done

[@carrot7512]

Pls reply sam

[@101Facts]

k lol

[@zyhs6942]

101 facts about germany please!!! ive been asking you for along time

[@MrEquilibruim]

Lets see, ruled by a fucking idiot, riddled with 'teenage' migrants, there are 2 to start

[@zyhs6942]

thats it

[@wrubies9055]

101Facts 101 facts about ireland.? Pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee (what a lot of e's)

[@alexb859]

2:44 also im wondering if crocodiles from the dinosaur times had feathers

[@droopsmoop]

no, since crocodilians are simply just the distant genetic cousins of dinosaurs. the featherlike filaments of some dinos seem to be ancestral to both pterosaurs and actual dinosaurs. But not other reptiles.

[@TitoTitoTitoTito]

11:00 at least new jursey is good for something

[@DanielJames-zr9ej]

I already found a mistake in the first 10 seconds it's more believe now that dinosaurs have feathers then scales dinosaurs are closely more related to birds

[@corvid1221]

The pronunciations are killing me :T

[@avazaqueen4535]

LMAO IM DYING HE DID NOT PUT A TAMPON AS A PERIOD IMAGINE LMFAOOO

[@connorvaughn7968]

Could you imagine a dinosaur acting like a bird? Like, it would just run up to you, stop, start flipping its head about and making deep gurgly chirping sounds, then just stare and frill its self up, waiting to hear a positive sounding vocal tone telling it how pretty its quills are.... :l

[@ohnonoarmyofficial5488]

The biggest dinosaur now found is the patagotitan

[@camerong7365]

I'm just glad that people don't get angry at Jurrasic Park, just because the dinosaurs don't have feathers.... I love JP

[@MaxMateEXE]

my “friend”chrastophar hates dinosaurs me personally, i find them so aweosome!