Even for 1989, that's atrocious. Most midsize sedans even in the late 1970s could keep the occupant compartment intact in a rear impact at just 30, yet this has major damage to the occupant compartment. Even at 35, pretty much every other vehicle of the same size and era did significantly better than this. This did as badly as a typical subcompact hatchback from the late '70s. And those were half the weight, had no trunk, and were 10 years older. We give the Ford Pinto grief, but the 1977-1980 models, after the fix, actually passed this test. This did about as badly as the infamous exploding 1971-1976 Pintos. On a design that was 17 years newer, not to mention significantly larger. August 29, 2022 11:45 pm
@runepedersenDK2 жыл бұрын
Agreed - at 2:05 it looks like the trunk is pushed forwards (not collapsing as it should), while the cabin acts as the crumple zone...
@markushallo90602 жыл бұрын
@@runepedersenDK Indeed, the back didnt crumble it looks like it is just pushed into the occupant compartment.
@markushallo90602 жыл бұрын
As a German I didnt even knew that Peugeots were sold on the US market.
@whattheheck10002 жыл бұрын
@@runepedersenDK I noticed that too, terrible design. Also, the asymmetrical deformation. August 30, 2022 7:15 pm
@whattheheck10002 жыл бұрын
@@markushallo9060 We got them over here in the States, I think they were first sold in the late 1950s. They were pulled in 1991 because of sales that had been plummeting for several years, in part due to poor safety. August 31, 2022 7:43 pm
@nyctereute91182 жыл бұрын
1:01 How did they manage to misspell Peugeot on the label when the rear badge is almost directly above it?
@cargogh2 жыл бұрын
When these were new, I thought they looked like what a larger smoother Corolla could be. The Mi16 we got in the US with the 150hp and manual was semi-badass. This test needed that trunk mounted wing for extra strength.
@randomcrashingfacility312 жыл бұрын
Crumple zone is the cabin🦍
@andreasausmuc2 жыл бұрын
I remember well how even German motor journalists praised the Peugeot 405 (and they usually praise just domestic manufactures) as the French Mercedes... Well - hardly any public crash tests then 😯
@Timico10002 жыл бұрын
Der ADAC hat 1991 einen offset-Crashtest (50km/h, 50%) mit Mittelklässlern gemacht (190er, 3er, Passat, Audi 80 & Co) und der 405 war zusammen mit dem Sierra der schlechteste Teilnehmer, weil die Lenksäule stark eingedrungen ist und der Fußraum extrem deformiert wurde. Dabei sah der Wagen äußerlich noch ganz okay aus. Falls du suchen möchtest: Motorwelt 9/91.
@andreasausmuc2 жыл бұрын
@@Timico1000 DANKE Dir - die Ausgabe hab ich sogar noch 😁 Ich hatte just vor diesem Video eines über die Entwicklung des W201 gesehen - da sah die Karosseriebau nach dem Heckaufprall ganz anders aus!
@Timico10002 жыл бұрын
@@andreasausmuc Hehe, cool! Ich hab noch die entsprechende AutoBild-Ausgabe. Stichwort Mercedes: such mal hier auf YT nach "Crashtest obere Mittelklasse 1990" vom Kanal "Schwarzfahrer", viel Spaß!
@andreasausmuc2 жыл бұрын
@@Timico1000 Danke abermals - wird umgehend umgesetzt!
@whattheheck10002 жыл бұрын
@@Timico1000 In English: in 1991, the ADAC did a 50 kph, 50% offset crash test on midsize cars such as the Mercedes 190, BMW 3 Series, VW Passat, Audi 80, and competitors. The 405 and Ford Sierra were the worst performers, due to extreme steering column movement, although they looked okay from the outside. Results are in ADAC Motorwelt 9/91. August 30, 2022 7:14 pm
@EngiNetion2 жыл бұрын
godawful for 48km/h
@tristankelly40594 ай бұрын
7/13/89
@joewhite80792 жыл бұрын
Now do the 50mph rear crash test.
@maddywendall2980 Жыл бұрын
Well French cars were Never up to American or most European brands safety standards...Hope they are today.😉
@IkhsanGTi Жыл бұрын
They (peugeot) improved since the introduction of x07 generation.
@nicou5338Ай бұрын
Well, the first car to reach 5 stars in the euroncap crash test history was a Renault. Mercedes, BMW and Saab for example had very bad results at the same tests.