2023 Honda CR-V Quick Review // RAV4 Slayer

The 2023 Honda CR-V EX-L ($43,390 in Canada, $35,260 in the US + destination) has been completely redesigned . It’s powered by a 1.5 litre turbo charged engine that puts out 190 horsepower. Paired with a CVT, only, it represents an easy, all-wheel drive practical purchase. Although it does have some pretty tough competition in this segment. Thomas and James spend some time with it and dive into what it’s all about. We hope you enjoy the episode. Subscribe!!
EXTRA THROTTLE HOUSE!
/ extrathrottlehouse
Throttle House Merch!
www.thethrottl...
Instagram!
/ thethrottlehouse
Facebook!
/ thomashollandproductions
Post-production by Karston Chong and Thomas Holland
Sound by Harrison Dickson and Karston Chong
Music from Epidemicsound.com and Artlist.io

[@nothere572]

I like seeing these more economy car reviews, not that the expensive cars are bad, but it’s nice to see these too!

[@danhughes1814]

This. It's nice to see reviews for cars that people can actually afford

[@AndrewUHS]

Generally are the only reviews I care about. That probably says more about my bank account than it does the cars.

[@danhughes1814]

@@AndrewUHS honestly, same. I'm tired of seeing 6 figure shit boxes with massive overboosted engines that need rebuilt before the first oil change

[@JohnSmith-me2wg]

These economy cars are bank breakers too now with the interest rates and not a penny in discounts!

[@nikolagregic7709]

Even this one is expensive as FK for me lol.

[@TheChimples]

The problem is that they paired a laggy turbo engine to a laggy transmission and then tuned it for fuel economy.

[@carllos25]

Some people want a little more room than a car, but also desire a good mpg efficiency. The market for this is not to be fast or sharp, but it's to be comfortable and reliable (CVT?).

[@jimiverson3085]

@@carllos25 Not an adequate excuse for putting a crummy, underpowered engine and a crummy transmission in a heavy car. Honda has done much better in the past, but they have apparent lost their game.

[@carllos25]

@@jimiverson3085 well, you know, now we get less for even more money. So I get what you mean.

[@TrayCaddyyy]

This with the Accord’s 10 speed and 2.0t engine would be to compete with Mazda

[@TheChimples]

@@carllos25 the point isn't about power and speed. It's about responsiveness which can be downright dangerous when trying to make a turn and not cut someone off or merging on the highway. I don't want massive power from my car, but I want instant response from the engine when I press the gas pedal. The lag in the response gives me no power up front and then too much power up top, it's like a rubberband effect which then necessitates me to brake to slow down. I experienced this in the Civic (turbo) already and I imagine it's even worse in this car.

[@cnxexpat1862]

I like when you review "normal" cars, not only expensive sport cars. Thanks.

[@cgatito3528]

Unfortunately, this is an expensive normal car.

[@gaara4667]

@@cgatito3528 35k?

[@Carfan678]

@@gaara4667 overpriced for what it is and it’s lack of features compared to competitors should be $5-7k cheaper than it is

[@kingdan7458]

It's a piece of shit, because it's an SUV so therefore a piece of shit. No more thought necessary. All SUVs are trash except for actual off road SUV of which they are very few. Fuck SUVs lets get back to PROPER cars.

[@aaron-fauth]

@@gaara4667 An absurd price.

[@noah_ow]

Love this type of content, Real world cars/ affordable daily drivers.

[@___MilkMan___]

Affordable…yeah totally

[@jacquesc3166]

Not today. The "affordable" option today is port injected, probably a 2.4, and it's over 10 years old. Rusted underneath, valve cover might need replacing... yeah. That one MIGHT be affordable. Unless you are talking from the perspective that NOT everyone 'should own a car', you feel you should, and you feel this one appeals to your monthly budget? Either way, you're not in touch with "today", affordable or not.

[@MatrixDiscovery]

$45k isn't affordable.

[@aryanbaweja896]

@@MatrixDiscovery 45k CAD is perfectly fine for what you get, especially considering the base model is even cheaper.

[@alexi5637]

Not related to this video, but this (sadly) has to be said: You guys have created something that is very close to what the original BBC Top Gear used to be and what a lot if producers have been trying to replicate for years. You guys are very close, if not even there, given the budget I assume you have, and make it seem effortless at the same time. Subtle humor combined with real automotive education packed into an entertaining package. Not the in-your-face-slapstick-humor-so-basic-and-obvious-so-everyone-must-understand-it combined with only drifting and drag racing expensive cars. So keep it up. You are awesome. And please don‘t lose it (what ever it is). Faithful viewer from Germany.

[@galactictomato1434]

The hybrid will definitely be marked up like crazy.

[@sylvainlaurin1012]

The hybrid will only be available in top trim version (Touring) in Canada. Then you'll have to pay the maximum in order to save gas. That's a big mistake !!!

[@Unchainedmaple888]

@Frederic St-Pierre Companies can't even make nearly enough hybrids to meet demand yet the lemmings believe we're supposed to all somehow be able to buy EVs

[@silverfox1234]

@Frederic St-Pierre I agree, I can see them offering the hybrid option in more trims in the following years.

[@dongolahmed]

good luck fixing ur hybrid Honda if anything in the power train goes bad

[@evraljones9862]

It's on their website. At least for the US market, the 2023 HRV AWD, Sport Touring is $38,600.

[@rideon41]

We bought the 2019 EX-L model in April of 2020, for a huge discount when dealers didn't know what to do with their inventory. I don't really understand the commentary about the handling, balance, etc. of that gen - it is the most boring, uninspired, yet quiet, comfortable, and fine handling CUV. Absolutely perfect for the role of a basic, spacious family car that will go on driving forever. We got it specifically because we don't want to put miles on our nice car, and couldn't be happier.

[@Catalano25]

Alot of car review channels review cars for "performance". They don't review it for how 90 percent of people drive cars

[@iridium130m]

CVT has infinite ratios, but not infinite range of ratios, they can actually be pretty limited in range to protect the weak steel belt that is utilized. So still geared with efficiency in mind. And imagine this with 4 people, all their stuff on a 90+F degree day with all the turbo lag.

[@jeffer1101]

That AND you need to keep in mind the power of the engine. Even if there was a very tall ratio available to simulate "lower gears", HP is simply a measure of an amount of work over a period of time. This is why a more powerful engine is "faster". Also, the Toyota hybrid systems don't use a belt, they use a planetary gear set, so that is also another reason why their system is much better than any belt system (which every other CVT system uses).

[@SME5724]

@@jeffer1101 yes agree Toyotas cvts are the best on the market …. If a CVT can even be considered such lol

[@macattack123mattc3]

Add that to the fact that honda's 1.5t doesn't have what I like to call "immediate power". Basically, off idle, it is completely gutless. You have to rev it out to 3-4k to begin to get power. Couple that with a (relatively) heavy vehicle, and you end up with the "floor it delay" they found.

[@miker6472]

Correct. I think the issue is that Honda tuned the throttle and trans to fuel economy at the expense of everything else. The CVT should have grabbed the lowest ratio possible much faster than a normal geared transmission in their full throttle scenario but it didn’t. To me that says Honda programmed in delay for normal people and even with a “sport” transmission mode didn’t give people a way to ask for more immediate acceleration. I think Honda is playing more games than they need to in order to hit FE targets, should’ve made the hybrid more accessible and called it a day.

[@jeffer1101]

@@miker6472 Possible, but it's still a large vehicle for a small 1.5L engine to move around. Not a big deal for casual driving, but if you are going to put your foot into, it's not going to be that fast. I think it has more to do with that than anything about the CVT's programming.

[@jasonsong86]

The problem with CVT is not that it doesn't have unlimited ratios. It does. However, the lowest ratio is pretty high due to being able to handle certain amount of torque so they had to make the pulleys bigger to have enough surface area to handle the torque. Due to size limitations, the lowest ratio is like a normal automatic in 2nd gear so the initial acceleration is pretty slow.

[@trentond4853]

Man.. even throttle houses boring car reviews are awesome. Well done fellas.

[@2WheelsAs1]

You don't "stomp" on it at a stop, it won't dump all the power on the CVT. Progressive throttle application works best. It can be relatively quick application, but not all at once.

[@eb110americana]

I rented a Versa with a CVT once. It did the same thing: It would bog the engine when flooring it to merge. And inexplicably, other times when I was just cruising around (maybe 30 mph), it would be at like 4,500 RPM for no reason. However, though I might question the shift logic, it got insanely good fuel economy with those antics.

[@29runnymede]

I had a BMW and spent a ton of money on service and made me paranoid about any upcoming work and I am far from broke... but to keep wealth driving a practical vehicle is a smart decision. This Honda (any many other SUV's) is a winner.

[@danieldesmond3422]

Me literally not interested in the car and only watching because I want to be entertained Thomas and James’s personalities tells you they’re doing a great job 😎

[@shinigami45-k4b]

I got a 2018 took on a road trip got great gas mileage was also doing 80 - 90 miles per hour passing cars no problem very comfortable drive fully loaded as well 4 people full trunk

[@pjandrews13]

You guys are literally the first and only major channel that I've heard mention dealer markups in a review. Thanks for factoring in real world issues!

[@Aaaronicus]

literally every car channel making videos rn has talked about dealer markups

[@fakcofee]

@@Aaaronicus lol exactly. Almost every reviewer mentions today’s market or adjustments. Parker lives on the moon somewhere

[@HankAaronJoseph19]

"When you buy a Honda, you end up with a Honda." Jeremy Clarkson

[@bextar6365]

That's the problem !!!

[@NicMagz]

I'd imagine this car would be way better with the 2.0 turbo from the Accord, but I'd imagine that'd cost MPG, which is typically important to CRV owners.

[@keithvolner930]

When you guys do normal cars, maybe touch on mpgs a bit too?

[@wintermuteryc]

Still living with the 2018 and we have gone on several road trips through mountain passes. It's fine for what it is - a big car that's easy on gas so it would be slow. It took the family with baby stuff, and the trunk being filled to the top, and still managed ~ 7 litres/100km. It could use more sound proofing but that would mean extra weight and even slower + worse fuel economy I guess. Reliability/durability-wise, I honestly don't think it will last as many km/years as the K-series CRV with NA and without DI and less electronics.

[@robervin9107]

Love Thomas’s hair 3:42 Definitely the best part for me love his laugh at the end as well he’s a gift to us all what a angel

[@Ianmundo]

Honda are absolutely smashing it lately with some seriously sensible, and near-perfectly executed designs

[@dietpixel]

"Honda: Like a good T-Shirt." I like it 😂

[@gagedykstra8602]

I think Honda should put the 2.0t from the accord in the CRV

[@GoofieNewfie]

and the hud, and the vented seats....

[@blackwhirlwind1245]

@@GoofieNewfie then your price go up and is closer to RDX, then you decide why not spend a bit more to get RDX? Although I do think it needs HUD, and Ventilated seats, and 360 camera. I personally don’t care about 2.0T engine, I want hybrid.

[@GoofieNewfie]

@@blackwhirlwind1245 no, other brands have this, and cheaper. The prices already went up. What are you paying for? Every vehicle has the features the Honda has and more. It's 4 grand more man! In Canada we also got a CRV last gen with a Pano...where's that? The RDX is weak, and I own a new Acura.

[@blackwhirlwind1245]

@@GoofieNewfie I’m with you, I’m also disappointed to see CRV lacks many features that other brand offers. Touring definitely needs a few more features. It would be my perfect car if it has ventilated seats, HUD, 360 camera, full digital gauge, flat loading floor, handle to fold down rear seats, and LED rear turn signal. I personally don’t mind they increase MSRP for a little over 40K.

[@Matthew-rn3ds]

@Steve O the crv touring model could still have a pano roof. I’m not holding my breath but I don’t know why they would get rid of it. And if you look under specs for the crv 23 on honda Canada’s website it has no information on a moon roof or pano roof. So we might get lucky who knows (in Canada )

[@chrisdblue]

I have absolutely no interest in a crv but these guys could review a banana and I would watch it.

[@williammitchell9566]

Of all the cars that exist, this is one of them

[@TheWombatCredenza]

I am neither a sensible person or a person interested in the Honda CRV, but throttle house rules! I am wombat.

[@MrMara7hon]

I wish they still made the Accord Crosstour. A 6 cylinder 4wd hatchback that drives like a car would check all of my boxes

[@mluu510]

Go try a Tesla model y. It'll change your world

[@Sadslantyface]

@@mluu510 lmao were not stupid

[@hamerplayer1229]

Had a 2013 crosstour with the V6 130,000 miles completely flawless. Wife wanted a new car we looked at the Acura RDX but that 2.0 turbo used premium only and got terrible mileage. Honda had nothing that would replace the crosstour except for the Passport and at 47k it was a joke. It was really not even an upgrade from the crosstour except for maybe the Android auto no 360 camera no pano roof etc. She ended up with a Mazda CX30 turbo with the premium plus package and is absolutely in love and doesn't miss the Crosstour at all

[@bryanmchugh1307]

I like it. I like it a LOT. Very good solid yet clean. Love my 2018 Touring. Kind of weird that this 1,5T is the same engine as the last gen but hey the last gen was actually pretty good. I aced 54MPG on the CAPITOL BELTWAY in mine without "Eco Mode" on..

[@xtifozzy]

Love the way my CRV handles. Sure its painfully slow but in the corners its suprisingly composed to the point where youre not afraid to chuck it into a corner. Ill just pretend its a momentum car

[@juakinwages8562]

That sunroof camera placement is awesome for visualizing how much vibes come through the interior, i'm not sure whats up with modern hondas but their cars really have a way of transmitting road noise right into your brain, hittin that first bump and hearing that strut pop wasnt the vibe

[@GoofieNewfie]

Honda has never been good at road noise. This is where Acura accels, but now even Acura isn't competitive in this area. My first gen TLX Elite was essentially an upgraded 13' Accord which I also owned and the first Honda I've owned in 25 years that was actually quiet with 18's on it. My New TLX is loud. Quite loud, tires, wind etc. They are living in a vacuum and not taking into account how good the competition has gotten.

[@juakinwages8562]

@@GoofieNewfie they are relying too much on noise cancelling tech, thats not really designed for that type of noise

[@Nutsofamily]

Finally! Thanks for coming back to Earth and reviewing cars that “most” people can afford. Just a wee confusion. Started off super harsh on it then softened to recommending it….

[@jacquesc3166]

"Most" people absolutely cannot afford a new car in today's monthly budget. No way. I consider myself lucky to make what I do, and I've never ever thought buying a new car was a financially viable idea. Affordable?? Better be a 2012 maintenance queen CR-V that you can drive with a relatively low cost of ownership over the next 5-6 years, otherwise... you don't get 'affordable' as an idea, much less 'most'.

[@Perich29]

We have the 2018 CRV EXL and we love it

[@Cap683]

I tried the Honda CRV EX waiting on the EXLs to come in to the dealership. I liked it very much. It is not a race car but had enough pep for me. It handles very well and is a comfortable ride. The CRV has the Honda DNA like my 2007 Accord. The 2023 Honda CRVs are better cars than the new Accords which were a huge disappointment.

[@tanakshmodi]

Finally! I was waiting for your review even after seeing all the reviews available on KZbin 😃 You guys are BEST!🥂✌️

[@SME5724]

I would still take the RAV4 prime no doubt ….. you guys are still the best though !!

[@lolsovs]

Actually the transmission "test" you do at 4:56 ish, try that with a DSG and see how laggy a transmission can be. Most transmissions are really bad in the let-off-the-throttle-to-coast-only-to-get-back-on-it maneuver, Toyota CVTs are decent responsive in this I've found.

[@ridhaoueslati393]

What is the price of the 2023 CRV LX FWD in canada please? Thanks

[@hellshade]

Did you guys change some setting on the GoPro on the front windshield? Looked kinda strange.

[@thecanadiancollector9352]

This cvt is the reason I didn't buy the civic. To get a manual transmission you had to get the hatchback for extra money. That extra money put the cost pretty close to a 2023 Camry SE with an eight speed transmission. My new Camry SE is white.

[@sdkurt8487]

Are you guys going to review the Mazda cx-50? Highly appreciated 👍

[@paulhenry913]

Honda hrv at least in the states is basically a AWD civic. Also, the 20/22 crv is just as good as this one imo. Same engine and trans minus the fake shifts.

[@robyg7037]

Great Review ETH ! Folks, go see this next gen CRV ! Its a winner and will sell ! Now when the production numbers increase ?, who knows !

[@measuredmind1841]

“Here’s an Honda” -James sounding remarkably like a certain other James that also talks about cars.

[@loganmahoney2284]

More hybrid options is better for everyone. But after seeing this still happy with my RAV4. Love the new look for the CRV.

[@rabd3721]

In my view, the R4 definitely has a slight edge over the CRV. Especially once you think of it as a mini-4Runner. Still, if someone gifted me a CRV, I wouldn't complain at all.

[@Just-a-guy926]

Needs the 2.0 turbo with the 10 speed automatic.

[@sammey1919]

I've owned this CRV for 6 months. It drives better now than when I took it off the lot. Great vehicle. It's not bought to gun around town like teenagers. If you can't get past the testoserone stuff then you're missing the complete point of having one.

[@RJKYEG]

We've got an '04 CR-V at my home, had it for a long time. It's slow, all CR-Vs are slow. Good AWD, lots of cargo room, comfortable, reliable, well built, well designed, not fast.

[@demetriusmoore7436]

I actually prefer last years design for the CRV only. But haven’t seen this in person yet

[@Juan_Kang]

The headlamp looks a bit too small

[@KyleWongCO]

I’ve always like the rav4. It’s exactly what you need with none of the fluff

[@davidcox2197]

I think the Rav4 is a leader now in the industry for this size car. You can still get a normal auto trans instead of a CVT cheapie trans, and you can get a non aspirated engine as well which is reliable. We quit buying CRV's our last is the 2014 with normal trans and non aspirated engine. Our next jump will be to either a Rav4 or a XC40 Volvo. No more Honda for us.

[@frankberg6598]

I'd like to see another small truck review from you guys, the Tacoma vs the new Frontier would be pretty cool.

[@DMX-du9mn]

Respect Honda to have physical buttons instead of glitchy on screen ones

[@annanyanag6597]

WE WANT EVERYDAY CARS LIKE THESE ON THE MAIN CHANNEL GUYS! Not all of us are rich

[@royarvindelacruz4718]

any news for the asian market? are they still producing diesel engines??

[@gasparnicchibelgrano1203]

Have seen this car on the road wondering how good it is?

[@iqbalgill149]

@1:37 is it just me or the crv from the last gen as well as this...have a wider trunk gap on the left than the right...

[@revvolutions]

These cars are the best cars to commute home in shit traffic on the 401, because they fade into the background and let you be alone with your thoughts, everything is in the right place, the view out is fantastic, none of the plastics stick out and become a point of contention, so you can just think about your long weekend plans or where you went wrong in life.

[@eranaut]

My 2013 Elantra has heated rear seats - I've been ahead of the game this whole time

[@fatbart8551]

CX5 slays both the CRV and RAV4.

[@GoofieNewfie]

Apparently the model as tested is just under 46K CDN. No Pano,no 360 cam, no HUD, no vented seats, even the Civic has more options like a full digital HUD, and at this price there are zero excuses. I expect a Civic interior in their smaller "Budget" SUV the HRV but at this price this is not acceptable. I'll be recommending the Mazda still. I was hoping to return to Honda but the CVT with the lack of these options...forget it. The Hybrid cost is going to be insane. These used to be Pilot prices. Honda is in trouble this year. They can't get inventory, and maybe these lack of features are a result of issues getting chips? but I can walk over to Mazda, get a Turbo cx50 for similar Money or go get a hybrid Rav.

[@knowledgeishere5072]

How do you compare the CR-V to the Tucson and Sportage?

[@thezacgorac]

I have an 02 CRV with 330K miles on it that i drive 120 miles daily to work. K24 is bullet proof.. I have always been skeptical of the newer ones with the CVT trans. Not sure why they just didn't do a tuned down version of the 2.0T w/ the 10 SPD in an AWD format.

[@tacuazinful]

k24 is the best!!!

[@ziyaeen]

Would love to see you do a review of the hybrid as well

[@OPC249]

I have to give Honda credit as they are the only brand to have the audacity to cheapen essential items on their best sellers and charge exponentially more for a slower, less reliable car 👏👏👏

[@MrRajee09]

💯

[@Catalano25]

Essential items are frame, engine, transmission, wheels, and safety. Which did they cheap out on? People don't buy crvs to go fast. Hondas reliability is still one of if not the best brand of car.

[@caglioso]

In the US at least it looks like the new one still doesn’t get a pano roof or 360° cam. Every other competitor offers those features at least as options and I don’t understand why Honda is so stingy with them.

[@iFigure]

I'm surprised how good the CR-V looks

[@matrix-fh9tn]

Haven't you seen Honda Accord last few years? It's raised up Accord in the front, and Volve in the rear.

[@vikashummer]

wait for new Rav4 to compare with this one

[@jordanjoestar8839]

Perhaps a tune and intake would add the so called "sparkle" that it seems to be missing. These motors pack a lot of power potential via software.

[@SilverScarletSpider]

Can we please have a Thomas Holland cooking content channel? Also would love to see Thomas’ DIY BMW M2 maintenance channel, because it can help demystify German luxury car maintenance. How will he tackle a BMW oil change or rod bearings, and how does it compare to doing an oil change on a Honda ?

[@res0zsfa]

The front looks like my moms 2020 Hyundai tucson

[@jeffer1101]

This might be a tough sell at $43,390 in Canada. You mention the RAV4, but you can get a RAV4 Hybrid Limited for $44,650 (so just over $1000 more) which (IMO) is a better vehicle over all in pretty much every metric. Alternatively, step down a couple of trims to the RAV4 Hybrid SE for $38,150 and save over $5k over this CRV. It uses the same bulletproof hybrid tech, so you'll still get incredible reliability and fuel economy. Yes, you'll need to order and wait, but you'll have to do that with everything nowadays anyway.

[@chubbychicken5585]

Rav4 hybrid limited is around $48K not $43K for the 2022 ( plus a 12 plus month wait ) the CR-V hybrid is $48,890 and aproximity 2-3 month wait as of now.

[@jeffer1101]

@@chubbychicken5585 The RAV4 Hybrid Limited is $44,650 (look on their website). There is an extra $255 charge for a few colour options, though.

[@f181234]

@@jeffer1101 except there’s no RAV4s in stock

[@jeffer1101]

@@f181234 Nothing is in stock. You'll need to pre-order whatever you want.

[@f181234]

@@jeffer1101 there’s a 12 month waiting list for the RAV4 I can get a CRV by the end November buyers are just gonna buy what’s available

[@DaveKootchie]

Wonder if Honda fixed the damn heater. I had a 2019 that the heater blew cold air when it went below 0 °F (-17 °C). I could watch the temp gauge go down to C when driving and it never came back up. Dealership told me that's been a recurring problem for other customers and urged me to drive slower, turn the blower down, and rely on heated seats. Really dangerous when its that cold and the windshield frosts up.

[@ahmediftekhar2503]

Can you do a Nissan Rouge video. I need your opinion before making a purchase decision.

[@MidnightAspec]

Sounds like one would just need to slide into the RDX for added performance. With the next generation RDX likely to have a Type S variant, maybe Honda will slot in a CR-V Touring 2.0T at some point.

[@Sheepleton]

My wife's Rav4 with the 8 speed does exactly what it should do...it's unnoticeable. You just drive and don't think about it, shifts are smooth and relatively quick. She easily gets 32mpg highway from a 4000lb awd suv. We paid $25k for it used with 6000k miles (Toyota certified) in 2020. A cvt is a deal breaker period.

[@Bonjurro]

I like the two extra knobs in this one 😂

[@mycarjournal]

There isn’t a better example of the word “Car” than a Honda CRV. It has enough space for a family, looks good, has enough power, has all the tech for 2023 and isn’t overly expensive and complicated. It’s just a car for normal people to drive from point a to point b and maybe go on vacation in between. I’m very glad Honda has come out with a CRV that actually looks good for once.

[@andrewduong2740]

The original 2 CR-Vs looked quite nice. Like lifted Civic Space Wagons.

[@alwaysiyi272]

I like how it looks, i do find it weird that the top trim doesn't come with bigger wheels but I bet ride quality is a lot better, I do find it weird that you cant get cooled seats or a panoramic sunroof on any trims, at least all the reviews on the top trims, I have watched don't have any

[@peterchen3295]

Please do more review of these kind of economy (the common people's car) vehicle more. Yes, we all love to see the expensive car (most of us can't afford), but reviewing the economy car will help us make better decision on purchasing the vehicle that we can afford.

[@idohearthatersdgk]

Why can’t Honda just start putting the 10 speed in everything? I’m willing to pay 2k extra to never have a CVT again. I can only imagine if my 22 civic had the 10 speed. Loved driving the accord with the 10 speed and would wish Honda would just move into the future and retire the CVT. The 2.0 liter and 10 speed in the CR-V would solve everything they said in the video. Also would be cheaper than making the hybrid

[@Mrnovanova]

I couldn't agree with you more. The old CR-V was such an eyesore. I never considered it while shopping because I don't think it's safe to drive around wearing a brown paper bag. The new one looks better but I still think that Honda's design language is the industry's worst.

[@samarthkatyal4285]

All it needs is a better intake and a good tune that’s it. You have a good car then

[@livelongandtroll9108]

"There are sensible people watching this." *Oh, oh... I'm not one of those people.* 😳

[@LOLINC2010]

the gen1 miata that you guys love so much is 0 to 60 in 9.2 seconds (when it was new...might be way slower now) 2024 cr-v that you guys re saying is too slow, is 8.7 seconds 0 to 60. not sure why you think the miata is so great, but the cr-v is so slow as to be nigh dangerous

[@claytonclarke5540]

Id like to speak towards Thomas on the cr-v not having a rugged trim. In a sense he’s right but I know my wife and I can’t be the only person out here looking for a crossover that gets decent mpg and can fit us our two dogs and some luggage so we can do a little camping and a little off-road stuff. We love the Toyota rav4 adventure and that’s what we’ll probably get and if we could afford the market up we’d get an explorer timberline. But if the cr-v had a rugged trim that’s definitely what we’d be getting.

[@brunohebert1351]

In 2019, one of the Honda dealers in my area (Nevada) had a fully specced rugged off road type of CR-V. I think it was 3rd party equipment but that might be a solution for you. After watching savage geese review of the Timberline (just this morning) I'd steer clear of that vehicle. What about a Subaru Outback Wilderness? or even just a regular Outback? I know some people in your situation (going camping off the trails with big dogs) and they love it.

[@claytonclarke5540]

@@brunohebert1351 we’ve considered the wilderness but have steered away because we’ll be putting a LOT of miles on the vehicle as it’ll be my wife’s daily to go to school and our road trip vehicle so we really want something that’ll go 250k miles without any major issues when taken care of but I’ll definitely go watch the timberline video👍🏼

[@charlesricker3548]

Have you checked out the Honda Passport? For about the price of a RAV4 Adventure you can pickup a Passport that has higher ground clearance and imo a better AWD system. I test drove both and the RAV4 adventure was really nice but for a similar price the passport couldn’t be beat.

[@CyLoZero]

for economy cars, surprised you guys haven’t reviewed the sport touring hatchback

[@mirceamunteanu4791]

Most Chain and Belt CVT have a too tall gearing, when you launch the car from a full stop it will take forever to rev out, the Toyota Corolla and Corolla Cross at least have a launch gear then the cvt belt will kick in and be sporty of the line...Very disappointed by CVT's in general. Missing my old 4 speed Auto 2008 Impreza.

[@sidneyrobinson9186]

as always great job enjoyed it :)

[@yuriteixeira5816]

Totally down to watch these regular car reviews Now if only someone made a channel called that...

[@oregonhighway]

I'm assuming a manual transmission is not an option?

[@sharonb.9128]

Great video. It looks more like the front of the European HRv introduced a few years ago.

[@AGhostRiderR]

The 170 or 180hp 2014 crv with the 2.4l na motor was so much better. And yes performance variante would be awsome, back in 2005 era with 5sp manual crv's, why can't they put the 2.0t in the crv, add a manual in my dreams. Oh yeah they don't add power because of acura, no reason to buy one at that point.

[@mihlebokveldt3774]

So extra throttle house doesn’t get the new logo treatment?

[@NXT_LVL]

Truly makes it that other channel that's "high quality" vs this one that "isn't"

[@gene978]

Not Available across the country (STATES), Most Honda Dealers are getting $5000 or more over Sticker Retail on 2022 models that are considered a year old as of now Civics, CR-V and Accords

[@User_2051]

definitely a good package for the price in the new crv, for most people its ok, but i need that merging and passing power

[@seananand4981]

Everything about this suv is nearly perfect only thing honda screwed up is definitely the Powertrain, what hell it's same powertrain as 2022 civic touring,

[@avigeil76]

When are you doing the Tucson 2022

[@DeAudiofilosyLocos]

I drove the sport touring and considered buying as a daily beater. but they are overcharging right now.

[@joeyhasan8330]

Good taste of watches Thomas. Nice speedy