2024 Ford Ranger Tremor review: 0-100 & POV test drive

[@autopiIo7]

Oh my.... i didnt expect you to jump it!!!! My jaw dropped on the intro

[@tonybennett638]

The man 👍 always a goood and super consistent look at all car stuff but probably a inch or too off what the great unwashed in Australia truly care about.

[@daniescholtz5268]

Great review, thanks. Tremor is permanently 4 wheel drive which is what all passenger vehicles should be. That's the difference.

[@gregj7916]

Gotta love these reviews... hopefully when the BYD Ute gets a run the battery doesn't have one of those thermal events....

[@mylifedoa]

If I owned this truck, I would leave it just as it is. The stock version is already stunning.

[@madrx2]

It's a ute bud. If you want a truck, buy a Kenworth.

[@user-vk4vd7vr5t]

There was no truck in this video

[@mylifedoa]

In Malaysia, we classify it as a pickup truck, but it's still considered a truck, not a car. Am I correct?

[@user-vk4vd7vr5t]

@@mylifedoathis isnt malaysia

[@rhoelg]

This need at least bull bar and bed cover

[@dingus2218]

Great review mate! Brett's Baja special

[@drivingenthusiastaustralia]

Haha - great rally ute!

[@user-vk4vd7vr5t]

Tremor is what the driver in front of a Ford Rager feels with an almost 50m stopping distance whilst the Rager is tapping their rear bumper at 100kph

[@mylifedoa]

Sounds like the Tremor driver might need a bit more time to react! But hey, at least the Ranger's ready for some off-road fun once they stop! 😄

[@HSstudio.Ytchnnl]

I wish this has a front locker or at least a limited-slip front diff

[@351tgv]

Bret, I have 4A in the Everest and the only time I have used it is when I have towed, yes it makes a huge difference in terms of stability and fuel consumption is only just worse off by about 1L per 100km over all. I think all auto Amarok (regardless of engines) are also 4A. Overall RWD for normal duties is fine for Everest and Ranger.

[@MrKiwijosh]

Is the tremor 150kw down from 154kw because of the euro 6 emissions with ad blue ? 1:21

[@trickster8635]

Yes, and the sign of things to come.....

[@mrdonny3501]

265 70 R 17 on the tremor as the wheels are not load rated. You cannot put LT rated.

[@trickster8635]

Wot do u mean the wheels are not load rated? Every wheel made is made to a load spec for that vehicle, regardless of brand.

[@mrdonny3501]

@@trickster8635 Tyre dealers cannot fit 265 70 LT 17 on factory ford rims. I was told this from a person that was knocked back as he asked for them to be fitted.

[@craigdavid6519]

geezus and i thought my camry was slow this is shocking

[@xk2fg]

47 metres to stop from 100kph is a disgrace and makes these third world vehicles a danger to everybody else on the road.

[@angusnz7910]

No it’s not flash but come on…the average retard on the road today I swear has a 20 meter reaction distance regardless of speed

[@drivingenthusiastaustralia]

@@xk2fg It’s not good. But all down to the tyres. No vehicle with these chunky tyres is going to pull up well. PS: Scary to think of all the old utes/4WDs out there with old brakes AND tyres like these.

[@A861967]

Yep had the previous Sport model and the stopping power was not even average, still Ford hasn’t upgraded much other than the better AWD / 4WD now.

[@asum307]

If you watch CarExpert there is a clip on there of the ranger raptor. I think it was 52 meters to stop from 100. Absolutely disgusting.

[@user-vk4vd7vr5t]

@@drivingenthusiastaustraliaand knackered lifted suspension

[@angusnz7910]

3700rpm…is that seriously as hard as it will rev? No wonder ford needs 10 speeds if the power range is that small

[@LCBBuilders]

11 second 0-100 km time is very average. My five y/o 3.2 XLT is quicker.

[@madrx2]

Nearly dangerously slow at accelerating and stopping.

[@TheHayabusa09]

Went and made a coffee for the 0-100kph section...Yawn..

[@AustraliaLuckyRichLife]

Byd Shark 6 is a better suited ute

[@Paradoxical124]

except when the tiny 1.5 litre blows up when you try to tow more than 1 ton.

[@drivingenthusiastaustralia]

It will be interesting to see how the new Shark goes with heavy-duty work. It doesn't have low-range, which means it might be a bit tricky at very slow-speed off-roading; too much instant torque maybe? Towing rating is apparently 2500kg.

[@angusnz7910]

@@Paradoxical124I could be wrong (was once on 1984…but I could be mistaken) but I think the byd uses the petrol purely to charge the battery, but in rare stars align scenario it can contribute to forward propulsion. That’s the impression I got from Chinese reviews anyway. If that is the case the petrol would never feel the load in the back…only the electric actually do that

[@jonathongellibrand3632]

Tremor? That's just weird! Does it vibrate extra hard? Does it cause earthquakes?😂

[@drivingenthusiastaustralia]

@@jonathongellibrand3632 Lol

[@tyzon00800]

Bi turdo motor big mistake,

[@ishaqthkr]

These biturbo 2L Juice engines are boring, and i don't know why but i have a feeling Toyota will slap a 2nd turbo on their GD engine and call it a W😂

[@351tgv]

Ford have them torque limited in 1st, 2nd ^ 3rd gear to around 350Nm. Which sucks but I guess they are worried that the torque converter are pretty much cooked with such short gearing. Also it appears that Ford have put a stabilizer spindle on the tail shaft as a running update,

[@ishaqthkr]

@@351tgv so basically it's not the engine but it's the useless extra gears? Shame.