204: Ayesha's Conduct towards the Family of the Prophet (Ahlulbayt)

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

Play your part in spreading the message of the Quran and Ahlulbayt by performing 3S: I) Share: Help us reach more hearts by sharing this content with your family and friends (especially those unaware of the School of Ahlulbayt). II) Subscribe: Connect with us on KZbin & Social Media Platforms (links in description). Or join our WhatsApp list by clicking on this link: wa.me/message/TAR3C325Z5LYO1 III) Support: Producing content like this is impossible without your support. Be our patron and pledge your monthly contribution at thaqlain.org/support

@NeoLeo877 Жыл бұрын

Why did Ali killed Usman brutally

@Kirkfernando1683 Жыл бұрын

😂😂

@zstyles4life Ай бұрын

As a Sunni Muslim who gained knowledge from sahih Hadith, it’s nice to get a perspective of our Shia brothers. Even more so this sheikh was able to articulate the matter by being very respectful and professional. It really for the first time makes me question some of the authenticity of the hadiths I have read over the years. May Allah guide us all on the right track.

@Thaqlain Ай бұрын

JazakAllah. And that's exactly the aim of this series. To present the point of view of the School of Ahlulbayt regarding Prophet's life academically.

@muniraalqamar Жыл бұрын

Thank you Thaqlain & Sayed Mohammed Baqer Qazwini ❤🖤 ⚘️

@fidahusayn8691 Жыл бұрын

Congrats to all believers on the occasion of birth anniversary of Imam Ali(as)

@zainabadu-gyamfi6371 Жыл бұрын

Ya Ali (AS) 🎉🎉🎉❤❤

@fidahusayn8691 Жыл бұрын

@@zainabadu-gyamfi6371 ❤❤❤

@drahmadmusa6995 Жыл бұрын

CONGRATULATIONS TO ALL OF US, ALLAH HAD THE MERCY UPON US TO BRING US AMIRUL MUUMIN AND HIS PROGENY AFTER THE PROPHET. ALLAH REWARD YOU ALL THE BEST OF THE REWARDS❤❤ FOR HAVING THE LOVE OF THE PROPHET(SAW) AND HIS SUCCESSOR ALI IBN ABI TALIB...CONGRATS

@abiabi9353 Жыл бұрын

Crazy people even they hear these enmity of aisha against Ahlulbayt, still praise aisha.

@laughAFrame Жыл бұрын

That's the Believers of Saqifa for you

@moono9614 Жыл бұрын

When Allah swt brings our beloved Mother Aisha r.a right back on the day of judgement Infront of all creations remember you were part of those people who spread the false fitnah on her name 😢 😢 😢

@laughAFrame Жыл бұрын

@@moono9614 on the day of judgement a lot of Muslim that were killed in Jamal will stand up and tell ALLAH that Our so called MOTHER MOBILIZED us against someone about whom we had heard from Rasool Ullah that, HE(ALI) IS WITH TRUTH AND TRUTH IS WITH HIM, WHERE EVER HE GOES TURN THE TRUTH TOWARDS THAT DIRECTION.

@laughAFrame Жыл бұрын

@@moono9614 on the Day of judgement , The QURAN itself will stand against the so called MOTHERS OF BELIEVERS, AND WILL TELL ALLAH that the mothers of the believers added false verses in me, which you never revealed (the verse of breasfeediing an adult man) and then declared that the quran was eaten by a Sheep

@laughAFrame Жыл бұрын

@@moono9614 on the Day of Judgement Rasool Ullah s.a.w. himself will stand against Ayesha, and will tell Allah that she conspired behind his back which Surah Tehreem Mentions. And if you think we are making propaganda or false claims then Go Burn SURAH TEHREEM, NAOZUBILLAH AND BURN YOUR SAHIH BOOKS OF AHADEES THAT MENTION THESE THINGS

@whyiamashia9497 Жыл бұрын

All are Sunni sources When Ubaidullah Ibn Utbah mentioned to Ibn Abbas that Aisha said “In his death-illness the Prophet was brought to (Aisha’s) house while his shoulders were being supported by Fadhl Ibn Abbas and another person”, then Abdullah Ibn Abbas said: “Do you know who this ‘other man’ was?” Ibn Utbah replied: “No.” Then Ibn Abbas said: “He was Ali Ibn Abi Talib, but she is averse to name him in a good context.” The references for the above narration can be located in the following texts: Musannaf Abd Al Razzaq Vol 5. pg. 228 - 230 Musnad Ahmad bin Hanbal, Vol. 43 pg. 86 - 87 Tradition 25914 Al-Tabaqat al-Kabir, by Ibn Sa’ad, Vol 2, pg. 179 History of al-Tabari (Arabic), Vol. 1, pg. 1800-1801 History of al-Tabari (English) Vol. 9 pg. 169-170 Ansab al-Ashraf, by al-Baladhuri, Vol. 2, pg. 215 The margin writer of Musnad Ahmed bin Hanbal namely Shaykh Shoib al-Arnaut stated: “The chain is Sahih according to the standards of the two Sheikhs (Bukhari & Muslim)” Aisha hated Banu Hashim and Imam Ali (as) Allamah Abu Umar Ahmed bin Abd Rabbah records in Iqd al-Farid, Vol. 5 pg. 76-77: He (Ali) said: ‘Go to that woman and tell her to return to her house wherein Allah ordered her to remain’. He (Ibn Abbas) said: ‘Hence I went to her and asked permission to enter but she refused to grant it, hence I entered the house without permission and sat on a cushion. She (Aisha) said: ‘Oh ibn Abbas, by Allah I never saw someone like you! You entered our house without permission and sat on our cushion without our permission’. I said: ‘By Allah this is not your house, your only house is the one which Allah ordered you to stay at, but you didn’t obey. The commander of the believers orders you to return to your home land which you left’. She said: ‘May Allah’s mercy be upon the commander of believers who is Umar bin al-Khatab’. I said: ‘Yes, and this is Ali bin Abi Talib the commander of believers’. She said: ‘I refuse, I refuse……’. Then she said: ‘Alright, I will return, because I hate the city in which you (Bani Hashim) reside’. In Al Imama wal Siyasa, Vol. 1 pg. 66 we learn that: “Following Uthman’s murder Talha approached Aisha in Makka and said ‘Look they have made ‘Ali Khalifa. She said, What right does ‘Ali have to rule over our necks? I will not stay in Madina as long as ‘Ali is in power.” In Rauzatul Ahbab, Vol. 3 pg. 65, we read that: “After the Battle of Jamal, Ali approached Aisha and said: ‘You have treated me like an enemy’”. We also read in Rauzat ul Ahbab, Vol. 3 pg. 10 that: “Aisha was clouded by her hatred of Ali”. We read in Musnad Ibn Hanbal, Vol. 41 pg. 322 Hadith 24820: حدثنا عبد الله حدثني أبي ثنا أبو أحمد قال ثنا عبد الله بن حبيب عن حبيب بن أبي ثابت عن عطاء بن يسار قال : جاء رجل فوقع في علي وفي عمار رضي الله تعالى عنهما عند عائشة فقالت أما علي فلست قائلة لك فيه شيئا واما عمار فإني سمعت رسول الله صلى الله عليه و سلم يقول لا يخير بين أمرين الا اختار أرشدهما ‘A man came and spoke negatively of Ali and Ammar in the presence of Aisha to which Aisha said: ‘I shall not tell you anything about Ali but as for Ammar, I heard the Holy prophet say that if he is provided with two options, he opts for the better one’. The margin writer of Musnad Ahmed bin Hanbal namely Shaykh Shoib al-Arnaut stated: “The chain is Sahih as per the condition of Muslim”

@AliAsghar-jl7tj Жыл бұрын

Thank u for this comment

@sunnyprantik4659 5 ай бұрын

1. Al Imamah wa al Siyasah One of the books that distort the history of early Islam is al Imamah wa al Siyasah, which is [falsely] attributed to Ibn Qutaybah. Dr. ‘Abdullah ‘Usaylan, in his book al Imamah wa al Siyasah fi Mizan al Tahqiq al ‘Ilmi, lists a number of points proving that this book attributed to Imam Ibn Qutaybah is false and is a fabrication. The evidence to that effect includes the following: None of those who wrote biographies of Ibn Qutaybah said that he wrote a book on history called al Imamah wa al Siyasah, and we do not know of any book of history that he wrote except for a book called al Ma’arif. Reading through the book gives one the impression that Ibn Qutaybah lived in Damascus and the Maghrib[1]; whereas, he never left Baghdad except to go to al Daynur. The methodology and style used by the author of al Imamah wa al Siyasah is completely different from the methodology and style of Ibn Qutaybah, as seen in those of his books that still exist. Ibn Qutaybah wrote lengthy introductions to his books, explaining his methodology and his aim in writing the book. In contrast, the author of al Imamah wa al Siyasah writes a very short introduction that is no more than three lines. In addition, there are differences in style. We do not see this methodology in the books of Ibn Qutaybah. The author of al Imamah wa al Siyasah narrates from Ibn Abi Layla in a way that gives the impression that he met him. But this Ibn Abi Layla is Muhammad ibn ‘Abdul Rahman ibn Abi Layla al Faqih, the judge of Kufah, who died in 148 A.H. It is well known that Ibn Qutaybah was not born until 213 A.H, sixty-five years after the death of Ibn Abi Layla. The narrators and Shuyukh from whom Ibn Qutaybah usually narrates in his books are not mentioned anywhere in this book. A large segment of his reports are narrated using phrases that indicate a problem with the reports. It often says: “They mentioned from some of the Egyptians”, “They mentioned from Muhammad ibn Sulaiman from some of the Shuyukh of the people of Egypt”, “Some of the Shuyukh of the Maghrib told us”, or “They mentioned from some of the Shuyukh.” Such phrases are far removed from the usual style and phraseology of Ibn Qutaybah and are not used in any of his books. The author of al Imamah wa al Siyasah narrates from two of the senior scholars in Egypt, but Ibn Qutaybah never went to Egypt and never learned from these two scholars.[2] Ibn Qutaybah is held in high esteem by the scholars, who regard him as one of Ahl as-Sunnah, trustworthy in his knowledge and religious commitment. Al Salafi said: Ibn Qutaybah was one of the trustworthy and one of Ahlus Sunnah. Ibn Hazm said concerning him: He was trustworthy in his knowledge and religious commitment. Al Khatib al Baghdadi said likewise. Ibn Taymiyah said concerning him: Ibn Qutaybah is one of the followers of Ahmed and Ishaq and one of the supporters of the Sunni mazhab.[3] If a man is held in such high esteem by the authentic scholars, does it make sense for him to be the author of a book like al Imamah wa al Siyasah, which distorts history and attributes to the Sahabah that which is no true?[4] Dr. ‘Ali Nufay’ al ‘Alyani says in his book ‘Aqidat al Imam Ibn Qutaybah, concerning al Imamah wa al Siyasah: After a critical reading of the book al Imamah wa al Siyasah, in my view it is most likely that the author of al Imamah wa al Siyasah was an evil Rafidi who wanted to attribute this book to Ibn Qutaybah because his books are numerous and because he was well known among the people for supporting Ahl al Hadith (the people of ahadith). He may have been one of the Rawafid of the Maghrib, as Ibn Qutaybah enjoyed a good reputation in the Maghrib.[5] What makes it likely that the author of al Imamah wa al Siyasah was a Rafidi is the following: The author of al Imamah wa al Siyasah claims that ‘Ali radiya Llahu ‘anhu said to the Muhajirin: I urge you by Allah, O Muhajirin, not to take the authority of Muhammad among the Arabs out of his house and home to yours and not to deprive his family of their rights, for by Allah, O Muhajirin; we are more entitled to that because we are Ahlul Bayt (the members of the Rasul’s ‘salla Llahu ‘alayhi wa sallam household) and are more entitled to this than you. By Allah, this is our right; do not follow whims and desires lest you go astray from the path of Allah.[6] No one believes that the Khilafah is the hereditary right of Ahlul Bayt except the Shia. The author of al Imamah wa al Siyasah harshly criticises the Sahabah of the Rasul of Allah ‘salla Llahu ‘alayhi wa sallam. He depicts Ibn ‘Umar radiya Llahu ‘anhu as a coward and Sa’d ibn Abi Waqqas radiya Llahu ‘anhu as jealous; he says that Muhammad ibn Maslamah got angry with ‘Ali ibn Abi Talib radiya Llahu ‘anhu because he killed the Jew Marhab in Khaybar, and that ‘Aisha radiya Llahu ‘anha ordered that ‘Uthman radiya Llahu ‘anhu be killed.[7] Criticism of the Sahabah is one of the most well-known characteristics of the Rawafid; the Khawarij do something similar, but they do not criticise the majority of the Sahabah.[8] The author of al Imamah wa al Siyasah says that Mukhtar ibn Abi ‘Ubaid was killed by Mus’ab ibn Zubair because he called people to rally behind the household of the Rasul of Allah ‘salla Llahu ‘alayhi wa sallam but he neglects to mention the myths introduced by Mukhtar or his claim of receiving revelation.[9] The Rawafid are the ones who love Mukhtar ibn Abi ‘Ubaid because he took revenge on the murderers of Hussain radiya Llahu ‘anhu. It should also be noted that Ibn Qutaybah rahimahu Llah mentioned Mukhtar among those who rebelled against legitimate authority, and he said that Mukhtar used to claim that Jibril ‘alayh al Salam came down to him.[10] The author of al Imamah wa al Siyasah wrote only about twenty-five pages concerning the khilafah of the first three khulafa’ Abu Bakr; ‘Umar and ‘Uthman radiya Llahu ‘anhum, whereas he wrote two hundred pages about the fitnah that occurred among the Sahabah. In other words, he reduced the greatest period of history to a few pages but wrote pages upon pages of false history, of which nothing is proven except a little. This is one of the known attributes of the Rawafid. We seek refuge with Allah from misguidance and betrayal. Al Sayed Mahmud Shukri al Alusi says in Mukhtasar al Tuhfah al Ithna ‘Ashariyyah: Part of their (the Rawafid) crafty tricks is that they look at the names of scholars who are respected by Ahl as-Sunnah, and whenever they find one who has the same name as one of their own scholars, they attribute the reports of that Shia scholar to him (the Sunni scholar). Those Sunnis who are unaware of this will think that this is one of their (Sunni) A’immah and will accept his words and rely on his reports.

@whyiamashia9497 5 ай бұрын

@@sunnyprantik4659 One of the doubts which Wahhabis set forth, which in reality is cast in order to escape certain [historical] realities, is that the work al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah was not written by Ibn Qutaybah al-Dinawari. Given that Ibn Qutaybah (d. 276/889) was counted as one of the [most] prestigious, renowned and excellent of scholars among Sunnis [in various fields such as] literature, history, law (fiqh), hadith, the sciences of the Qur’an etc., Wahhabis have not been able to question his credibility or personality. [As such], they prefer to focus their efforts [in casting doubt] on al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah’s attribution to Ibn Qutaybah and thus [bidding] to debase its reliability. Therefore, we make it incumbent upon ourselves to investigate and answer these unscientific claims. First, this book has been countlessly printed in Egypt and other countries under the name of Ibn Qutaybah al-Dinawari whose manuscripts are available in libraries across Egypt, Paris, London, Turkey and India. Second, as long as there are Islamic scholars, what need is there to rely on Orientalists like Dozy (who is far from being an actual Islamic scholar!) in order to establish the reliability or unreliability of [an Islamic] work? Why is there a need to refer to Orientalists who in many instances have even denied the existence of the Prophet Muhammad (s)? It is clear that our Sunni friends have come short in regard to their proofs and as such, [they have had no choice] but to take refuge in Orientalists. Third, many scholars among Ahl al-Sunnah, even contemporary ones, have explicitly authenticated and attributed the book to Ibn Qutaybah and have cited its historical traditions. Here we will briefly point out a few [examples]: 1) Ibn Hajar al-Haythami in his book Tathir al-Jinan wa al-Lisan. See Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, Abu al-ʿAbbas Ahmad b. Muhammad b. ʿAli (d. 973/1565), Tathir al-Jinan wa al-Lisan (n.p), 72. 2) [al-Qadhi Abu Bakr] Ibn al-ʿArabi al-Maliki in his book al-ʿAwasim min al-Qawasim [where the author] narrates some of the contents of the book [al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah] and attributes them to Ibn Qutaybah. See: Ibn al-ʿArabi, Muhammad b. ʿAbd Allah Abu Bakr (d. 543/1148). al-ʿAwasim min al-Qawasim fi Tahqiq Mawaqif al-Sahabah baʿd wafat al-Nabi (s), ed. Muhib al-Din al-Khatib & Mahmud Mahdi al-Istanbuli (Beirut: Dar al-Habil, 1407/1987), I: 261. 3) Najm al-Din ʿUmar b. Muhammad al-Makki, known as “Ibn Fahd”, when mentioning the events of the year 93 A.H (711 C.E) writes in his book Itihaf al-Wara bi-Akhbar Umm al-Qura: و قال ابومحمد عبدالله بن مسلم ابن قتيبة في كتاب الامامة و السياسة... Abu Muhammad ʿAbd Allah b. Muslim b. Qutaybah said in his book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah. See: Ibn Fahd, Najm al-Din ʿUmar b. Muhammad al-Makki, Itihaf al-Wara bi-Akhbar Umm al-Qura (n.p: n.d), under events of 93 A.H. Afterwards, [Ibn Fahd] narrates Saʿid b. Jubayr’s (d. 95 A.H/711 C.E) arrest from the same book. 4) Qadhi Abu ʿAbd Allah al-Tanuzi, known as “Ibn Shabbat” in his book al-Silat al-Samtiyah. See: al-Tanuzi, Abu ʿAbd Allah. al-Silat al-Samtiyah (n.p: n.d), part II, section 34. 5) Taqi al-Din al-Fasi al-Makki in his book al-ʿAqd al-Thamin. See: al-Fasi al-Makki, Taqi al-Din, al-ʿAqd al-Thamin (n.p: n.d), VI: 72. 6) Yusuf Ilyan Sarkis in his book Muʿjam al-Matbuʿat al-ʿArabiyah, mentions his book when recounting the life of ibn Qutaybah: الإمامة والسياسة ابتدأ فيه بذكر فضل أبي بكر وعمر. مط النيل 1322 جزء 2 بتصحيح محمد محمود الرافعي مصر 1327 ص 395 مط الفتوح الأدبية جزء 2 1331 ص 181 و 184. al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah begins by mentioning the virtue[s] of Abu Bakr and Umar. Al-Nil pub. 1322 A.H/1904 C.E v. II, ed. Muhammad Mahmud al-Rafiʿi Egypt 1327 A.H/1909 C.E, p. 395 al-Futuh al-Adabiyah pub. v. II 1331 A.H/1912 C.E, pp. 181 and 184. See: Sarkis, Yusuf Ilyan, Muʿjam al-Matbuʿat al-ʿArabiyah (Qum: Maktabat Āyat Allah al-Marʿashi al-Najafi, 1411/1990), I: 211. 7) Farid Wajdi writes in his book Da’irat al-Maʿarif al-Qarn al-ʿAshrin: اورد العلامة الدينورى في كتابه الامامة و السياسة.... Allamah al-Dinawari, in his book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah, cited [the following]… See: Wajdi, Farid, Da’irat al-Maʿarif al-Qarn al-ʿAshrin (n.p: n.d), II: 754. In another instance, he also writes: ... كتاب الامامة و السياسة لابى محمد عبدالله بن مسلم الدينورى المتوفى سنة 270 هـ. … [the] book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah [which] belongs to Muhammad ʿAbd Allah b. Muslim al-Dinawari (d. 270 A.H). Ibid, 749 […] 8) Dr. Ahmad Zaki Safut, the famous contemporary Egyptian writer and professor of Arabic, has cited [various] material from al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah in a number of places in his book Jamharat Khutab al-ʿArab which he attributes to ibn Qutaybah: وزاد ابن قتيبة في الامامة والسياسة: والله يا أهل العراق ما أظن هؤلاء القوم من أهل الشأم إلا ظاهرين عليكم. …and Ibn Qutaybah added in his book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah: Oh People of Iraq! By Allah, I reckon that the people of the Levant (al-Sham) only show their facades to you [and not what is inside their hearts]. See: Safut, Ahmad Zaki, Jamharat Khutab al-ʿArab (Beirut: al-Maktabat al-ʿIlmiyah, n.d) I: 422. وزاد ابن قتيبة في الإمامة والسياسة: فرق الله بيني وبينكم وأعقبني بكم من خير لي منكم وأعقبكم. […] and Ibn Qutaybah added [the following tradition from ʿAli ibn Abi Ṭalib] in his book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah: “May God separate me from you, and replace you as my followers with someone who is better for me [as followers]. And make you to be replaced [after me with a new leader…].” See: Jamharat Khutab al-ʿArab, I: 426. نص آخر لخطبة طارق. وروي ابن قتيبة هذه الخطبة في الإمامة والسياسة بصورة أخري. […in] another text for the sermon. Ibn Qutaybah narrated this sermon in his al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah in another way. See: Jamharat Khutab al-ʿArab, II: 316. Is the emphasis of all of these great scholars of Ahl al-Sunnah in attributing this book to Ibn Qutaybah not sufficient? Fourth: a number of Sunni scholars, despite having attributed the book to “Ibn Qutaybah” as well as having accepted some of the bitter and unpleasant historical realities that have been narrated in the book in regard to the first part of Islam’s history, have nevertheless criticized Ibn Qutaybah as to why he did not gloss over, censor or distort (tahrif) history [when it comes to the Companions]! They have stated that he, like other scholars, must show self-restraint in narrating certain [problematic historical] realities. al-Qadhi [Abu Bakr] ibn al-ʿArabi2 [d. 553 A.H/1148 C.E] in his book al-ʿAwasim min al-Qawasim states: ومن اشد شيء على الناس جاهل عاقل أو مبتدع محتال فأما الجاهل فهو ابن قتيبة فلم يبق ولم يذر للصحابة رسما في كتاب الامامة والسياسة ان صح عنه جميع ما فيه One of the worst thing[s] [to befall] on people is a learned simpleton or deceitful innovator (mubtadiʿ). However, the simpleton (jahil) [here] is Ibn Qutaybah who has not observed the custom (rasm) [of censorship] with regard to[the faults of] the Companions (sahabah) in the book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah, [that is] if everything in the book can be authentically [attributed] to him.3 See: Ibn al-ʿArabi, Muhammad b. ʿAbd Allah Abu Bakr (d. 543 A.H/1148 C.E), al-ʿAwasim min al-Qawasim fi Tahqiq Mawaqif al-Sahabah baʿd wafat al-Nabi (s), ed. Muhib al-Din al-Khatib & Mahmud Mahdi al-Istanbuli (Beirut: Dar al-Habil, 1407/1987), I: 261. If there were no other proofs in attributing this book to Ibn Qutaybah except for the above statement of al-Qadhi Ibn al-ʿArabi, it would have been enough for truth-seekers (ahl al-haqq). This is because in addition to establishing the attribution of the book, Ibn al-ʿArabi’s statement also sheds light on the motives behind the Sunni attempts to deny the book’s attribution to [its proper author]. The Sunnis believe that when confronted with traditions related to the problematic behavior of the Companions, it is incumbent on historians and traditionists [alike] to remain silent, hide and cover-up those traditions. When it became necessary to show restraint in merely narrating the minor disputes of the Companions, the avoidance of narrating the oppression, abuses and injuries that Imam ʿAli (a), Fatimah the Purest (a) and the rest of Ahl al-Bayt (a) faced became ubiquitous and the necessity for censorship became more extreme. It is interesting that even Shaykh ʿAbd al-Hamid Ismaʿil Zehi, the [Sunni] imam for Friday prayers in Zahedan (Iran) admitted this in one of his interviews: ما موظف به حفظ حرمت صحابه هستيم. ما نمى گوييم كه صحابه معصومند و گناه نمى‌كنند؛ اما نبايد به جاى يادآورى خوبي‌ها و اعمال صواب آن‌ها، متذكر خطاهايشان باشيم.... It is incumbent upon us to preserve the sanctity of the Companions. We do not say that the Companions were infallible and that they did not sin. However, instead of remembering their merits and good deeds, one should not mention their mistakes… See: Nida-yi Islam (Journal), Hawzah-yi ʿIlmiyah-yi Dar al-ʿUlum-i Zahidan, 1st year, no. 4, p. 11

@whyiamashia9497 5 ай бұрын

@@sunnyprantik4659 One of the doubts which Wahhabis set forth, which in reality is cast in order to escape certain [historical] realities, is that the work al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah was not written by Ibn Qutaybah al-Dinawari. Given that Ibn Qutaybah (d. 276/889) was counted as one of the [most] prestigious, renowned and excellent of scholars among Sunnis [in various fields such as] literature, history, law (fiqh), hadith, the sciences of the Qur’an etc., Wahhabis have not been able to question his credibility or personality. [As such], they prefer to focus their efforts [in casting doubt] on al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah’s attribution to Ibn Qutaybah and thus [bidding] to debase its reliability. Therefore, we make it incumbent upon ourselves to investigate and answer these unscientific claims. First, this book has been countlessly printed in Egypt and other countries under the name of Ibn Qutaybah al-Dinawari whose manuscripts are available in libraries across Egypt, Paris, London, Turkey and India. Second, as long as there are Islamic scholars, what need is there to rely on Orientalists like Dozy (who is far from being an actual Islamic scholar!) in order to establish the reliability or unreliability of [an Islamic] work? Why is there a need to refer to Orientalists who in many instances have even denied the existence of the Prophet Muhammad (s)? It is clear that our Sunni friends have come short in regard to their proofs and as such, [they have had no choice] but to take refuge in Orientalists. Third, many scholars among Ahl al-Sunnah, even contemporary ones, have explicitly authenticated and attributed the book to Ibn Qutaybah and have cited its historical traditions. Here we will briefly point out a few [examples]: 1) Ibn Hajar al-Haythami in his book Tathir al-Jinan wa al-Lisan. See Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, Abu al-ʿAbbas Ahmad b. Muhammad b. ʿAli (d. 973/1565), Tathir al-Jinan wa al-Lisan (n.p), 72. 2) [al-Qadhi Abu Bakr] Ibn al-ʿArabi al-Maliki in his book al-ʿAwasim min al-Qawasim [where the author] narrates some of the contents of the book [al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah] and attributes them to Ibn Qutaybah. See: Ibn al-ʿArabi, Muhammad b. ʿAbd Allah Abu Bakr (d. 543/1148). al-ʿAwasim min al-Qawasim fi Tahqiq Mawaqif al-Sahabah baʿd wafat al-Nabi (s), ed. Muhib al-Din al-Khatib & Mahmud Mahdi al-Istanbuli (Beirut: Dar al-Habil, 1407/1987), I: 261. 3) Najm al-Din ʿUmar b. Muhammad al-Makki, known as “Ibn Fahd”, when mentioning the events of the year 93 A.H (711 C.E) writes in his book Itihaf al-Wara bi-Akhbar Umm al-Qura: و قال ابومحمد عبدالله بن مسلم ابن قتيبة في كتاب الامامة و السياسة... Abu Muhammad ʿAbd Allah b. Muslim b. Qutaybah said in his book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah. See: Ibn Fahd, Najm al-Din ʿUmar b. Muhammad al-Makki, Itihaf al-Wara bi-Akhbar Umm al-Qura (n.p: n.d), under events of 93 A.H. Afterwards, [Ibn Fahd] narrates Saʿid b. Jubayr’s (d. 95 A.H/711 C.E) arrest from the same book. 4) Qadhi Abu ʿAbd Allah al-Tanuzi, known as “Ibn Shabbat” in his book al-Silat al-Samtiyah. See: al-Tanuzi, Abu ʿAbd Allah. al-Silat al-Samtiyah (n.p: n.d), part II, section 34. 5) Taqi al-Din al-Fasi al-Makki in his book al-ʿAqd al-Thamin. See: al-Fasi al-Makki, Taqi al-Din, al-ʿAqd al-Thamin (n.p: n.d), VI: 72. 6) Yusuf Ilyan Sarkis in his book Muʿjam al-Matbuʿat al-ʿArabiyah, mentions his book when recounting the life of ibn Qutaybah: الإمامة والسياسة ابتدأ فيه بذكر فضل أبي بكر وعمر. مط النيل 1322 جزء 2 بتصحيح محمد محمود الرافعي مصر 1327 ص 395 مط الفتوح الأدبية جزء 2 1331 ص 181 و 184. al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah begins by mentioning the virtue[s] of Abu Bakr and Umar. Al-Nil pub. 1322 A.H/1904 C.E v. II, ed. Muhammad Mahmud al-Rafiʿi Egypt 1327 A.H/1909 C.E, p. 395 al-Futuh al-Adabiyah pub. v. II 1331 A.H/1912 C.E, pp. 181 and 184. See: Sarkis, Yusuf Ilyan, Muʿjam al-Matbuʿat al-ʿArabiyah (Qum: Maktabat Āyat Allah al-Marʿashi al-Najafi, 1411/1990), I: 211. 7) Farid Wajdi writes in his book Da’irat al-Maʿarif al-Qarn al-ʿAshrin: اورد العلامة الدينورى في كتابه الامامة و السياسة.... Allamah al-Dinawari, in his book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah, cited [the following]… See: Wajdi, Farid, Da’irat al-Maʿarif al-Qarn al-ʿAshrin (n.p: n.d), II: 754. In another instance, he also writes: ... كتاب الامامة و السياسة لابى محمد عبدالله بن مسلم الدينورى المتوفى سنة 270 هـ. … [the] book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah [which] belongs to Muhammad ʿAbd Allah b. Muslim al-Dinawari (d. 270 A.H). Ibid, 749 […] 8) Dr. Ahmad Zaki Safut, the famous contemporary Egyptian writer and professor of Arabic, has cited [various] material from al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah in a number of places in his book Jamharat Khutab al-ʿArab which he attributes to ibn Qutaybah: وزاد ابن قتيبة في الامامة والسياسة: والله يا أهل العراق ما أظن هؤلاء القوم من أهل الشأم إلا ظاهرين عليكم. …and Ibn Qutaybah added in his book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah: Oh People of Iraq! By Allah, I reckon that the people of the Levant (al-Sham) only show their facades to you [and not what is inside their hearts]. See: Safut, Ahmad Zaki, Jamharat Khutab al-ʿArab (Beirut: al-Maktabat al-ʿIlmiyah, n.d) I: 422. وزاد ابن قتيبة في الإمامة والسياسة: فرق الله بيني وبينكم وأعقبني بكم من خير لي منكم وأعقبكم. […] and Ibn Qutaybah added [the following tradition from ʿAli ibn Abi Ṭalib] in his book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah: “May God separate me from you, and replace you as my followers with someone who is better for me [as followers]. And make you to be replaced [after me with a new leader…].” See: Jamharat Khutab al-ʿArab, I: 426. نص آخر لخطبة طارق. وروي ابن قتيبة هذه الخطبة في الإمامة والسياسة بصورة أخري. […in] another text for the sermon. Ibn Qutaybah narrated this sermon in his al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah in another way. See: Jamharat Khutab al-ʿArab, II: 316. Is the emphasis of all of these great scholars of Ahl al-Sunnah in attributing this book to Ibn Qutaybah not sufficient? Fourth: a number of Sunni scholars, despite having attributed the book to “Ibn Qutaybah” as well as having accepted some of the bitter and unpleasant historical realities that have been narrated in the book in regard to the first part of Islam’s history, have nevertheless criticized Ibn Qutaybah as to why he did not gloss over, censor or distort (tahrif) history [when it comes to the Companions]! They have stated that he, like other scholars, must show self-restraint in narrating certain [problematic historical] realities. al-Qadhi [Abu Bakr] ibn al-ʿArabi2 [d. 553 A.H/1148 C.E] in his book al-ʿAwasim min al-Qawasim states: ومن اشد شيء على الناس جاهل عاقل أو مبتدع محتال فأما الجاهل فهو ابن قتيبة فلم يبق ولم يذر للصحابة رسما في كتاب الامامة والسياسة ان صح عنه جميع ما فيه One of the worst thing[s] [to befall] on people is a learned simpleton or deceitful innovator (mubtadiʿ). However, the simpleton (jahil) [here] is Ibn Qutaybah who has not observed the custom (rasm) [of censorship] with regard to[the faults of] the Companions (sahabah) in the book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah, [that is] if everything in the book can be authentically [attributed] to him.3 See: Ibn al-ʿArabi, Muhammad b. ʿAbd Allah Abu Bakr (d. 543 A.H/1148 C.E), al-ʿAwasim min al-Qawasim fi Tahqiq Mawaqif al-Sahabah baʿd wafat al-Nabi (s), ed. Muhib al-Din al-Khatib & Mahmud Mahdi al-Istanbuli (Beirut: Dar al-Habil, 1407/1987), I: 261. If there were no other proofs in attributing this book to Ibn Qutaybah except for the above statement of al-Qadhi Ibn al-ʿArabi, it would have been enough for truth-seekers (ahl al-haqq). This is because in addition to establishing the attribution of the book, Ibn al-ʿArabi’s statement also sheds light on the motives behind the Sunni attempts to deny the book’s attribution to [its proper author]. The Sunnis believe that when confronted with traditions related to the problematic behavior of the Companions, it is incumbent on historians and traditionists [alike] to remain silent, hide and cover-up those traditions. When it became necessary to show restraint in merely narrating the minor disputes of the Companions, the avoidance of narrating the oppression, abuses and injuries that Imam ʿAli (a), Fatimah the Purest (a) and the rest of Ahl al-Bayt (a) faced became ubiquitous and the necessity for censorship became more extreme. It is interesting that even Shaykh ʿAbd al-Hamid Ismaʿil Zehi, the [Sunni] imam for Friday prayers in Zahedan (Iran) admitted this in one of his interviews: ما موظف به حفظ حرمت صحابه هستيم. ما نمى گوييم كه صحابه معصومند و گناه نمى‌كنند؛ اما نبايد به جاى يادآورى خوبي‌ها و اعمال صواب آن‌ها، متذكر خطاهايشان باشيم.... It is incumbent upon us to preserve the sanctity of the Companions. We do not say that the Companions were infallible and that they did not sin. However, instead of remembering their merits and good deeds, one should not mention their mistakes… See: Nida-yi Islam (Journal), Hawzah-yi ʿIlmiyah-yi Dar al-ʿUlum-i Zahidan, 1st year, no. 4, p. 11.

@whyiamashia9497 5 ай бұрын

One of the doubts which Wahhabis set forth, which in reality is cast in order to escape certain [historical] realities, is that the work al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah was not written by Ibn Qutaybah al-Dinawari. Given that Ibn Qutaybah (d. 276/889) was counted as one of the [most] prestigious, renowned and excellent of scholars among Sunnis [in various fields such as] literature, history, law (fiqh), hadith, the sciences of the Qur’an etc., Wahhabis have not been able to question his credibility or personality. [As such], they prefer to focus their efforts [in casting doubt] on al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah’s attribution to Ibn Qutaybah and thus [bidding] to debase its reliability. Therefore, we make it incumbent upon ourselves to investigate and answer these unscientific claims. First, this book has been countlessly printed in Egypt and other countries under the name of Ibn Qutaybah al-Dinawari whose manuscripts are available in libraries across Egypt, Paris, London, Turkey and India. Second, as long as there are Islamic scholars, what need is there to rely on Orientalists like Dozy (who is far from being an actual Islamic scholar!) in order to establish the reliability or unreliability of [an Islamic] work? Why is there a need to refer to Orientalists who in many instances have even denied the existence of the Prophet Muhammad (s)? It is clear that our Sunni friends have come short in regard to their proofs and as such, [they have had no choice] but to take refuge in Orientalists. Third, many scholars among Ahl al-Sunnah, even contemporary ones, have explicitly authenticated and attributed the book to Ibn Qutaybah and have cited its historical traditions. Here we will briefly point out a few [examples]: 1) Ibn Hajar al-Haythami in his book Tathir al-Jinan wa al-Lisan. See Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, Abu al-ʿAbbas Ahmad b. Muhammad b. ʿAli (d. 973/1565), Tathir al-Jinan wa al-Lisan (n.p), 72. 2) [al-Qadhi Abu Bakr] Ibn al-ʿArabi al-Maliki in his book al-ʿAwasim min al-Qawasim [where the author] narrates some of the contents of the book [al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah] and attributes them to Ibn Qutaybah. See: Ibn al-ʿArabi, Muhammad b. ʿAbd Allah Abu Bakr (d. 543/1148). al-ʿAwasim min al-Qawasim fi Tahqiq Mawaqif al-Sahabah baʿd wafat al-Nabi (s), ed. Muhib al-Din al-Khatib & Mahmud Mahdi al-Istanbuli (Beirut: Dar al-Habil, 1407/1987), I: 261. 3) Najm al-Din ʿUmar b. Muhammad al-Makki, known as “Ibn Fahd”, when mentioning the events of the year 93 A.H (711 C.E) writes in his book Itihaf al-Wara bi-Akhbar Umm al-Qura: و قال ابومحمد عبدالله بن مسلم ابن قتيبة في كتاب الامامة و السياسة... Abu Muhammad ʿAbd Allah b. Muslim b. Qutaybah said in his book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah. See: Ibn Fahd, Najm al-Din ʿUmar b. Muhammad al-Makki, Itihaf al-Wara bi-Akhbar Umm al-Qura (n.p: n.d), under events of 93 A.H. Afterwards, [Ibn Fahd] narrates Saʿid b. Jubayr’s (d. 95 A.H/711 C.E) arrest from the same book. 4) Qadhi Abu ʿAbd Allah al-Tanuzi, known as “Ibn Shabbat” in his book al-Silat al-Samtiyah. See: al-Tanuzi, Abu ʿAbd Allah. al-Silat al-Samtiyah (n.p: n.d), part II, section 34. 5) Taqi al-Din al-Fasi al-Makki in his book al-ʿAqd al-Thamin. See: al-Fasi al-Makki, Taqi al-Din, al-ʿAqd al-Thamin (n.p: n.d), VI: 72. 6) Yusuf Ilyan Sarkis in his book Muʿjam al-Matbuʿat al-ʿArabiyah, mentions his book when recounting the life of ibn Qutaybah: الإمامة والسياسة ابتدأ فيه بذكر فضل أبي بكر وعمر. مط النيل 1322 جزء 2 بتصحيح محمد محمود الرافعي مصر 1327 ص 395 مط الفتوح الأدبية جزء 2 1331 ص 181 و 184. al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah begins by mentioning the virtue[s] of Abu Bakr and Umar. Al-Nil pub. 1322 A.H/1904 C.E v. II, ed. Muhammad Mahmud al-Rafiʿi Egypt 1327 A.H/1909 C.E, p. 395 al-Futuh al-Adabiyah pub. v. II 1331 A.H/1912 C.E, pp. 181 and 184. See: Sarkis, Yusuf Ilyan, Muʿjam al-Matbuʿat al-ʿArabiyah (Qum: Maktabat Āyat Allah al-Marʿashi al-Najafi, 1411/1990), I: 211. 7) Farid Wajdi writes in his book Da’irat al-Maʿarif al-Qarn al-ʿAshrin: اورد العلامة الدينورى في كتابه الامامة و السياسة.... Allamah al-Dinawari, in his book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah, cited [the following]… See: Wajdi, Farid, Da’irat al-Maʿarif al-Qarn al-ʿAshrin (n.p: n.d), II: 754. In another instance, he also writes: ... كتاب الامامة و السياسة لابى محمد عبدالله بن مسلم الدينورى المتوفى سنة 270 هـ. … [the] book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah [which] belongs to Muhammad ʿAbd Allah b. Muslim al-Dinawari (d. 270 A.H). Ibid, 749 […] 8) Dr. Ahmad Zaki Safut, the famous contemporary Egyptian writer and professor of Arabic, has cited [various] material from al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah in a number of places in his book Jamharat Khutab al-ʿArab which he attributes to ibn Qutaybah: وزاد ابن قتيبة في الامامة والسياسة: والله يا أهل العراق ما أظن هؤلاء القوم من أهل الشأم إلا ظاهرين عليكم. …and Ibn Qutaybah added in his book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah: Oh People of Iraq! By Allah, I reckon that the people of the Levant (al-Sham) only show their facades to you [and not what is inside their hearts]. See: Safut, Ahmad Zaki, Jamharat Khutab al-ʿArab (Beirut: al-Maktabat al-ʿIlmiyah, n.d) I: 422. وزاد ابن قتيبة في الإمامة والسياسة: فرق الله بيني وبينكم وأعقبني بكم من خير لي منكم وأعقبكم. […] and Ibn Qutaybah added [the following tradition from ʿAli ibn Abi Ṭalib] in his book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah: “May God separate me from you, and replace you as my followers with someone who is better for me [as followers]. And make you to be replaced [after me with a new leader…].” See: Jamharat Khutab al-ʿArab, I: 426. نص آخر لخطبة طارق. وروي ابن قتيبة هذه الخطبة في الإمامة والسياسة بصورة أخري. […in] another text for the sermon. Ibn Qutaybah narrated this sermon in his al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah in another way. See: Jamharat Khutab al-ʿArab, II: 316. Is the emphasis of all of these great scholars of Ahl al-Sunnah in attributing this book to Ibn Qutaybah not sufficient? Fourth: a number of Sunni scholars, despite having attributed the book to “Ibn Qutaybah” as well as having accepted some of the bitter and unpleasant historical realities that have been narrated in the book in regard to the first part of Islam’s history, have nevertheless criticized Ibn Qutaybah as to why he did not gloss over, censor or distort (tahrif) history [when it comes to the Companions]! They have stated that he, like other scholars, must show self-restraint in narrating certain [problematic historical] realities. al-Qadhi [Abu Bakr] ibn al-ʿArabi2 [d. 553 A.H/1148 C.E] in his book al-ʿAwasim min al-Qawasim states: ومن اشد شيء على الناس جاهل عاقل أو مبتدع محتال فأما الجاهل فهو ابن قتيبة فلم يبق ولم يذر للصحابة رسما في كتاب الامامة والسياسة ان صح عنه جميع ما فيه One of the worst thing[s] [to befall] on people is a learned simpleton or deceitful innovator (mubtadiʿ). However, the simpleton (jahil) [here] is Ibn Qutaybah who has not observed the custom (rasm) [of censorship] with regard to[the faults of] the Companions (sahabah) in the book al-Imamah wa al-Siyasah, [that is] if everything in the book can be authentically [attributed] to him.3 See: Ibn al-ʿArabi, Muhammad b. ʿAbd Allah Abu Bakr (d. 543 A.H/1148 C.E), al-ʿAwasim min al-Qawasim fi Tahqiq Mawaqif al-Sahabah baʿd wafat al-Nabi (s), ed. Muhib al-Din al-Khatib & Mahmud Mahdi al-Istanbuli (Beirut: Dar al-Habil, 1407/1987), I: 261. If there were no other proofs in attributing this book to Ibn Qutaybah except for the above statement of al-Qadhi Ibn al-ʿArabi, it would have been enough for truth-seekers (ahl al-haqq). This is because in addition to establishing the attribution of the book, Ibn al-ʿArabi’s statement also sheds light on the motives behind the Sunni attempts to deny the book’s attribution to [its proper author]. The Sunnis believe that when confronted with traditions related to the problematic behavior of the Companions, it is incumbent on historians and traditionists [alike] to remain silent, hide and cover-up those traditions. When it became necessary to show restraint in merely narrating the minor disputes of the Companions, the avoidance of narrating the oppression, abuses and injuries that Imam ʿAli (a), Fatimah the Purest (a) and the rest of Ahl al-Bayt (a) faced became ubiquitous and the necessity for censorship became more extreme. It is interesting that even Shaykh ʿAbd al-Hamid Ismaʿil Zehi, the [Sunni] imam for Friday prayers in Zahedan (Iran) admitted this in one of his interviews: ما موظف به حفظ حرمت صحابه هستيم. ما نمى گوييم كه صحابه معصومند و گناه نمى‌كنند؛ اما نبايد به جاى يادآورى خوبي‌ها و اعمال صواب آن‌ها، متذكر خطاهايشان باشيم.... It is incumbent upon us to preserve the sanctity of the Companions. We do not say that the Companions were infallible and that they did not sin. However, instead of remembering their merits and good deeds, one should not mention their mistakes… See: Nida-yi Islam (Journal), Hawzah-yi ʿIlmiyah-yi Dar al-ʿUlum-i Zahidan, 1st year, no. 4, p. 11.

@Traveller444 24 күн бұрын

Islam is Allah's gift to us so that we may learn to worship Him and develop Ihsan in our character, focusing on alleged enmity between important people in our history and judging them only impedes our own growth of iman and ihsan. And Allah knows better.

@Thaqlain 24 күн бұрын

How can we grow when we don't know whom to follow and whom not to follow 🙂

@sonabarnes6670 Жыл бұрын

Astounding sabr on your part. May Allah bless you!

@krymsonkayharmony2529 Жыл бұрын

Assalaam A'laikum. CONGRATULATIONS to you Fam, on the birth anniversary of our beloved Imaam Ali a.s.❤️Awsome programs. I do have a little reauest though. The Sunni booms mentioned, is it possible to make mention of them in the description below please? If it's possible. Will appreciate it much for our research too. Keep up the good works and be safe😊🌹🍀🌷🌻☘

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

Alaykum Salaam. Congratulations to you to. InshaAllah we will be developing blog posts from these videos containing all references in full.

@rabiasaeed2206 Жыл бұрын

Jazakallah Allah Molana for stating the Facts of Islamic History from the pulpit. Bravo ! Specially from the Sunni School of Thoughts unity of Muslims is must for the Arrival of the last Son of Rasool Allah for the Establishment of kingdom of Peace for all Mankind.Equality and Justice for all. Educate the World 🌎 Islam is a Religion of Peace ☮️

@guiders14 Жыл бұрын

May Allah curse the enemy of Imam Ali as

@ed92122 8 ай бұрын

May Allah protect you Sayed

@dulalmiah6191 Жыл бұрын

Muslim loves Ali RA May Allah be pleased with him .

@NP0451 Жыл бұрын

Mash'Allah. Thankyou.

@yoursolosquad6283 Жыл бұрын

I seriously cannot understand how our Sunni brothers and sisters hear these narrations in their own books of aisha and still praise her, like what is there left for her to do for you to understand?! Does she need to kill the prophet for you to understand she is a disbeliever?! Wake up and dont be like the Quran says:, Deaf, dumb, blind, so they do not understand | صمٌ بكمٌ عميٌ فهم لا يعقلون

@liahnatashah5145 11 ай бұрын

Because of Ignorance .that s it

@maisamnazim4247 7 ай бұрын

By the way, according to some narrations from sunni and shia sources, Aisha was also involved in prophet's assassination.

@Maicon-b1b 3 ай бұрын

Jesus Christ died for your sins Look up the thousands of testimonies of people who die and go to hell and heaven There's even studies on NDEs because there's so many testimonies

@abdulvahid9043 Жыл бұрын

These people excited and parished, we will not be questioned about their deeds nor they will be questioned about our deeds We will be questioned about whom we followed, whom Allah teala and His messenger did appoint to follow to achieve eternal mercy instead of eternal punishment Obey Allah and His messenger and Amirs among you Allah has the right to choose and they don't have the right to choose

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

Salaam Alaykum. This episode is part of a series where we have examined all the wives of the Prophet and the lessons we can learn from them. We will urge you to watch it completely before reaching conclusion. 🙂 kzbin.info/aero/PLOXzVYnjThorUIEtu2YYLNRMq6CBgUOu3 The episode in question, too, is connected to other episodes trying to answer the reliability of Ummul Momineen Ayesha as a narrator of hadith and Sunnah.

@Qlenzz Жыл бұрын

They claim Shias hate Prophet Muhammad sww wives. Was Aisha the only wife? We don't Sunnis talk much about Umm ul Momeneen Salma r.a, Umm ul Momeneen Khadija and other wives

@ghassanzahran4484 4 ай бұрын

We all talk about them, and we love them. You pretend to love Prophet Mohamed pbuh and trash his wife and friends as if he cannot choose.

@user-eh2pv4sc7h Ай бұрын

@@ghassanzahran4484have you read the quran, Aysha Hafsa appear in the surah of the disobedients not trustworthy housewives so stop praising them. Sunni just follow their scholars and ignore what Allah says in the quran.

@ab5680 Жыл бұрын

Sunnis in the comments coping after hearing the truth about their beloved Ayesha (la)

@user-eh2pv4sc7h 8 ай бұрын

She was never beloeved. READ THE QURAN TO SEE WHAT ALLAH SAYS ABOUT HER.

@HKHasty Жыл бұрын

Makes me sad I’m 33 and I lived my whole life believing Sunni dogma 😢 اللهم صلي على محمد واله

@rohlmayers1792 Жыл бұрын

Its not how you start, its how you end. God bless.

@NeoLeo877 Жыл бұрын

Later you realise the total Shia and sunni stories are fake

@yoursolosquad6283 Жыл бұрын

Brother always thank Allah (SWT) he saved you, God bless your pure soul 🌹

@Maicon-b1b 3 ай бұрын

Jesus Christ died for your sins Look up the thousands of testimonies of people who die and go to hell and heaven There's even studies on NDEs because there's so many testimonies

@Freedomanidea Ай бұрын

These are lies tell him why imam ali gave her daughter hand to hazrat omar and why did he marry hazrat Abu Bakr widow.becoz they loved each other and all Shia books qoute zarrara wit no chain of naŕation

@AhsanAli-dl5if Жыл бұрын

Thanks.

@ethandouro4334 Жыл бұрын

Allahume Sale Ale Mohamad Vale Ale Mohamad Selamun Aleykum great standing and may Allah compensate your efforts, JazakAllah khayr. Greetings from Brazil 🇧🇷 Btw, can you ask for adding english, arabic and spanish/portuguese subtitles in the video, please? Looking forward to watch all of the lectures

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

Alaykum Salaam. We are working hard towards adding English subtitles. The volunteers of Bilal Subtitling Initiative have completed 100 episodes of the series already.

@ethandouro4334 Жыл бұрын

@@Thaqlain Allahuma barik feek

@commercialandresidentialpl7337 Жыл бұрын

Selam our Brazilian brother from your Bosnian brother.

@bellaasif2309 Жыл бұрын

Sir, where do you conduct these lectures I want to learn?

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

Al Hujjah Islamic Seminary

@itgw4658 11 ай бұрын

@@Thaqlainis that a place or a website?

@SS-yo4qk 11 ай бұрын

It's shocking. I can only think of her as monafiq.

@habibanathani3747 Жыл бұрын

As she is wife of holy prophet Ali A.S is her son in law forget he being successer

@Freedomanidea Ай бұрын

Nahjulbalagah ,zarrar was cursed by imam jaffer becoz of lies

@naqueevi Жыл бұрын

Quick question, if Aisha refused to attend Bibi Fatima’s (AS) funeral, then does that mean her burial was known (and did not occur in the night)?

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

It did occur in the night. The rooms of the wives and that of Lady Fatima were next to one another. So it was natural of the wives to offer condolence.

@AFGHNISTANI Жыл бұрын

Good

@fadelalkarbalai9766 Жыл бұрын

I am first to comment 😁

@krymsonkayharmony2529 Жыл бұрын

Lol, very well☺

@ethandouro4334 Жыл бұрын

allahuma barik feek akhi

@nomairshahzad7960 Жыл бұрын

Is it possible that we can indicate Lady Khadija (as) was the favourite wife of the Prophet Muhammad (SAW). As he remained completely monogamous to her during her lifetime despite having the ability to marry multiple wives (as would be normal for a man of his status), as we know that all wives a Muslim man takes must be treated justly and equally, and he would be unable to do that with any other woman next to Lady Khadija (as)?.

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

She was indeed the most beloved wife of the Prophet and the one praised by Allah in the Quran. We have covered her life in episodes 21 onward in this series.

@jimmykahn5431 Жыл бұрын

The prophet will turn away from the Shia for spreading fake news.

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

We are here to correct if anything shared in this episode can be proven to be fake.

@muhammadhamza5467 Жыл бұрын

@@Thaqlain bro why don't you debate with Muhammad hijjab, adnan rashid , ammar nakhswani etc , so that academics of sunni side could jude your argument ,being sunni I don't think what so ever you are referring to is present ...

@ibrahimharith9878 Жыл бұрын

@@muhammadhamza5467Wallahy what a sad life we fail to use our intellect when Allah has clearly said ,Only men of understanding and reasoning will see His signs

@moono9614 Жыл бұрын

If believing Muslims who still spread fitnah are unjust and are fine with speaking falseness about our beloved Mother Aisha r.a we will stand with her and her rights! And defend her, if the lord of the worlds defended her we must do the same as much as we possibly can and defend her too. Mat Allah guide you people ameen

@HadithOfThaqlain Жыл бұрын

Falseness? Did you watch the video? He literally used Sunni sources ONLY. This is ridiculous, may Allah destroy the enemies of the Prophet PBUH.

@moono9614 Жыл бұрын

@@HadithOfThaqlain Yeah 🙄, Ameen, I was talking about the comments, they are so rude about our beloved Mother Aisha r.a

@HadithOfThaqlain Жыл бұрын

@@moono9614 Beloved mother? A mother who kills her own children? Have you forgotten about the Battle of Jamal?

@moono9614 Жыл бұрын

@@HadithOfThaqlain OMG here we go again, she never started the battle of jamal! She was with 2 companions that chose to go out and find out who killed Uthman r.a and good on her for trying to bring justice for Uthman r.a . It is very true that her intention was to not go into war but rather to see who murdered Uthman r.a in a peaceful manner. And the hypocrite's attacked. It was not her fault, and actually you would be surprised how many people she is beloved to including the Prophet Muhammad saws himself.

@moono9614 Жыл бұрын

@@HadithOfThaqlain That is why when Imam Ahmad ibn hamad who died 200 years after hijra of the battle of the camel was asked which side should be taken and he replied by quoting “that was a battle that Allah saved our swords from having to have blood so why don't we save our tongues from having sides. In other words Alhamdillah that was a battle we didn't have to pick our swords because we won't alive back then, I wasn't forced to choose sides so then why are you dragging my tongue in and making me force and give sides now let me be quite and that there is pure sunni ideology that we believe in. And Aisha r.a did not deeply hate Ali r.a they were both people who were righteous and had a misunderstanding, whatever happened, happened and life goes on. So let's all try to follow our Mother Aisha r.a intellect and respect her as she highly deserves ameen :)

@tawsifrezachowdhury7478 5 ай бұрын

Alaihis salam kyu?

@ed92122 8 ай бұрын

11:00 no comment

@shamstameez Жыл бұрын

Why quote Hadith from history works? You know very well that Sunnis have a Hadith tradition. They don’t take Hadith from history books.

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

The previous episodes explores hadith from hadith books too. But history books are considered equally important in developing corpus of any Islamic school.

@muhammadhamza5467 Жыл бұрын

@@Thaqlain no they are not most of the historic world , don't need to be supported by chain of narrations ,and is influence by socio political conditions ,,. Plus author of the work is kind of authority In it ,, where hadees is scrutinize by mean of ilm ur rijal, science of hadees and so on...

@user-eh2pv4sc7h Ай бұрын

@@Thaqlainthey take from the enemies of rasoollah.

@rehanagoogle3869 Жыл бұрын

Not true that she harts Ahul-Bay Alhe-salaam and Ayesha loved Maula Ali alaihis salam

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

Salaam Alaykum. That's what most of us have been told. But the truth as found in historical references and books of hadith is otherwise :)

@ItachiAli1993 Жыл бұрын

Yeah and that's why Ayesha fought against Imam Ali because she loves him... 😂

@pookiee-s3o 5 ай бұрын

It was narrated that 'Aishah said: “Sahlah bint Suhail came to the Prophet and said: 'O Messenger of Allah, I see signs of displeasure on the face of Abu Hudhaifah when Salim enters upon me.” The Prophet said: “Breastfeed him.” She said: “How can I breastfeed him when he is a grown man? The Messenger of Allah smiled and said: “I know that he is a grown man.” So she did that, then she came to the Prophet and said: “I have never seen any signs of displeasure on the face of Abu Hudhayfah after that.” And he was present at (the battle of) Badr. Reference : Sunan Ibn Majah 1943

@pookiee-s3o 5 ай бұрын

can you please help me with this narration. Some people are saying that aisha ra was forced to breastfeed men by Hazrat Muhammad saw I know that this ain't true but I need your help to give detail answer with the sources to prove this hadith ain't true

@Thaqlain 5 ай бұрын

It is because of these hadiths that we don't take Sunnah from Ayesha bint Abi Bakr :)

@pookiee-s3o 5 ай бұрын

@@Thaqlain but the non-Muslim does. What should I reply to them?

@Thaqlain 5 ай бұрын

This series :) Help them understand that the Prophet, as present in the books of Ahlal Sunnah, is different from the Prophet given to us by the Quran and Ahlulbayt. There are political reasons why so many such controversial narrations are in books regarded as Sahih by Ahlal Sunnah.

@Maicon-b1b 3 ай бұрын

@@pookiee-s3otheres a reason why those hadiths have lasted If they were fabricated they wouldn't last a single year

@muhammadhamza5467 Жыл бұрын

Why don't this scholar debate with Muhammad hijjab , ammar nakhwani etc , if he really thing that he has get so much information, but you can fool only fools with this weak sources...

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

Please share proves that the sources provided are weak. We understand that the information is new for you but that doesn't mean it is inauthentic.

@shettimaumar9235 6 ай бұрын

Aisha is also Ahl Bayt if you don't know Quran surah Ahzaab 33 : 33

@Thaqlain 6 ай бұрын

Ayesha herself will differ because there are clear narrations from the Prophet that only Ahlal Kisa are Ahlulbayt. There is a narration from Ayesha herself in Tafsir al-Kashaaf.

@zaheer3456 Жыл бұрын

This guy just spreads hatred in the name of Islam with his biased and closed mindset. May Allah swt guide and protect the ummah from such fitnah of dividing and feeling hatred among muslim brothers

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

Please share where is hatred in this episode?

@sunnyprantik4659 5 ай бұрын

0:30 Abū al-Faraj al-Iṣbahānī is a shia muslim.. stop lying dude!!! 😂😂😂😂

@Thaqlain 5 ай бұрын

We never knew that people from the progeny of Marwan were Shia 🙂

@shabirahmedkhankhan3631 Ай бұрын

Jakkarin soul of thought bakvas aysha

@billybs9965 Жыл бұрын

I listened without judgement trying to understand your pov , but when you said "We doubt her repentance", I stopped watching. My belief is even of a human today - only Allah knows whats in their hearts, so only Allah can judge him/her, and you are talking of someone who is the wife of the prophet SAW. Sorry, my belief in Allah doesn't allow me continue!

@mahmoodvisram1739 Жыл бұрын

I’d like to ask that if Allah SWT openly reprimands her in the qur’an and has left it open - he has not revealed any verses after to say that she was forgiven for her actions conspiring against the prophet SAW, isn’t that a good reason to doubt her repentance? Or would you go against the Quran?

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

We doubt her repentance due to the fact that she continued with the cause that required her repentance in the first place. As Sayed mentioned, we have nothing personal against her :)

@billybs9965 Жыл бұрын

@@mahmoodvisram1739 Allah knows best. My Allah is most Merciful, always forgiving and loves us unconditionally.

@billybs9965 Жыл бұрын

@@Thaqlain Did Allah give us the right to judge the repentance of another human?

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

Not at all. But that makes her a controversial figure to take the Sunnah of the Prophet from. And that's the whole point of this video.

@itz_goku4u 8 ай бұрын

Why is this guy slandering ayesha so badly ..... with no authentic proof

@Thaqlain 8 ай бұрын

We are there to provide any proof/references that are required :)

@Maicon-b1b 3 ай бұрын

Aisha spoke facts Muslims can't handle the truth

@Ilsaahsan 3 ай бұрын

Because you guys blindly believe her stupid lies that's why this guy is telling the truth about Ayesha with authentic proofs and facts but you guys are unable to understand/see.

@user-eh2pv4sc7h Ай бұрын

Proof is in your books and thd quran. Ayasha and Hafsa are mentioned in the surah if the disobedient, not trustworthy wives. Read your books instead of following your mufti.

@Freedomanidea Ай бұрын

Sob

@suhaibhaider6440 Жыл бұрын

One lecture for 72 hoore. Plz

@allysoobratty7565 Жыл бұрын

Have to be careful about HADITHS ,many of them are not AUTHENTIC

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

Indeed. But when you have similar reports it means that the person is definitely controversial :)

@allysoobratty7565 Жыл бұрын

@@Thaqlain There is no SHIA or SUNNI in Islam,we are all MUSLIM!!!!

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

Indeed. Where did we deny that?

@Freedomanidea Ай бұрын

Hadith you are saying are your hadiths,your first two imams where was the living in medina.who planned shahada of imam ali shia kufa who even decieved imam hussain

@user-eh2pv4sc7h Ай бұрын

That waa sunnu ummayad who deceived him not his shia.

@user-eh2pv4sc7h Ай бұрын

Read Bukhari, his head is brought Ibyn Ziyaad, these are all sunni leaders

@Freedomanidea Ай бұрын

Cursing of 3 Khalifa,ayesha and your hadith with no chain of narration.why did hazrat ali give his daughters hand to hazrat omar and why did he marry hazrat Abu Bakr widow.prophet died choose to stay with ayesha and died in her arms .

@Thaqlain Ай бұрын

There are two problems with your comment: 1) There is no cursing involved. Except if you consider academic study as cursing. 2) The 2nd part of the comment is filled with wrong information.

@user-eh2pv4sc7h Ай бұрын

Please read your bukhari to see what they did. You too busy following men on earth.

@Quraniyoonq8r Жыл бұрын

Stop creating dis unity in the Ummah

@Thaqlain Жыл бұрын

Salaam Alaykum. The unity of the Ummah is in following the path of the Prophet (s) through Quran and Prophet's progeny (Thaqalayn). There is no intention to create disunity here :)

@nooriah78 Жыл бұрын

May Allah SWT bless our Mother Aisha. It is very sad people in her time and even after her death are spreading fitna on her name. Verses of Quran were sent down her honour. May Allah SWT raise her rank shower abordance blessing on her. The beloved wife of our beloved Prophet Muhammad PBUH.