"A New Perspective on Insulin Sensitivity" -

[@ForceFreeTrainergirl06]

THANK YOU FOR THE "VIBES" !!!!! Now I need to persuade my doctors that this is a real thing. Been living with T1 for 53 years, the last 7yrs of those on the omipod. My whole diabetes regime changed with the pod. However the "vibes" remained the same. Like this morning. scanned my sensor. A bit over 7. My Dash PDM told me to take "x: amount of insulin. My brain said "whoa, too much" I decided to ignore the correction dosage. True enough even then, my bg dropped to 4 within 30 mins while I got ready to go out. I use the "vibes" all the time. Most of the time, I'm right. Sometimes I am completely wrong. My diabetes doesn't follow the rules that have been set by my Endo and my settings. It just doesn't work that way. That's why I am keen to try looping which I hope to do very soon.

[@rnv71950]

I am just 10 years into t1d prognosis and am a 69 year old man. No clinical background and mathematically challenged (!), but fascinated by your presentation. G6/tslim 2x wearer. I’d consider consulting you as my endo.

[@brunettagarrard3556]

Thanks much Chris!

[@FatCatAnna]

Thank you for this!

[@bollekeboy]

Very Cool. Thank you this is very interesting. Some friendly constructive points: - Units! If you add units to your equation it will be obvious that it's differerent for those who use mmol/l - "Inflection point" - I don't think you're using the term correctly. - "Machine Learning" - while you used machine learning to achieve this it is not what most people would call machine learning. Most people would call this process "curve fitting"

[@bollekeboy]

Another thing. You make brief reference to the fact that 277700 is almost 'e x 10^5' and make some sort of deep mystical implications. The thing is, this is a constant with units and units are arbitrary. If this was in mmol/l it would not look like 'e' x anything. The actual value of constants only has any sort of real meaning if they are unit-less which this is not.