It is necessary to weigh the position of the wisdom axis in each wisdom layer, and on top of that, it is vital to find the center of gravity. If it is balanced, the rotation will stay stable. Furthermore, I think the axis of wisdom must penetrate the center of gravity. Suppose the standing position of each module in each wisdom layer and the axis aligned with the wisdom axis are stepped up in the positive direction of the wisdom axis due to the spin of the surrounding PDCA cycle. In that case, it is considered a positive vector and moves in the negative direction. If so, the method of calculating the position of the center of gravity by quantifying it as a negative vector and weighting the vector at each standing position may be an effective parameter for suppressing rotational fluctuations. To reduce the wasteful use of the life energy of the organization as an independent module, we need to align the axes of individual modules to the wisdom axis and step up the rotation speed of the PDCA cycle in the positive direction of the wisdom axis. Although it is practical, it is vital to have ethical indicators aligned along the axis of wisdom to prevent pragmatism from running out of control.