"We are overweight but it's no big deal" "Dump 1/3 of the economy class passengers"
@AndrewPa Жыл бұрын
🤣
@techmantra452111 күн бұрын
Lmfao
@Parker-di7ef5 жыл бұрын
Simulator is worth more than an entire neighborhood.
@darkpixel2k4 жыл бұрын
Simulators costing more than an entire neighborhood are made so you usually don't destroy an entire neighborhood.
@theflyingmylle4 жыл бұрын
Aaron de Bruyn lol true 😂
@aumarigan4 жыл бұрын
I'd be concerned if it's only worth one house.
@crazyfroggie65464 жыл бұрын
Depends if its a neighbourhood in Beverly Hills, all those mega-mansions owned by film stars and Kardashians..heck of a lot of $$$.
@michelebucci36294 жыл бұрын
A simulation like this can cost to 10milion euros up to 20milion
@gwinbeer5 жыл бұрын
4:43 "We are overweight but it's no big deal" Oktoberfest is no joke
@MrDaanjanssen3 жыл бұрын
10/10 joke hahah
@tachacastilho3 жыл бұрын
Right, wouldn’t it be better to burn some fuel before landing? That’s my doubt here.
@pierre-olivierdebrogniez21553 жыл бұрын
@@tachacastilho First ECAM action states LAND ASAP. Due to the fact that you can't clearly assess the reason of the dual engine failure (eg: fuel contamination), it might happen again while you're jettisoning to reduce weight. If times permits, overweight checklist has to be run but any weight above max landing weight won't restrict you to land. Just a much needed maintenance will be required for the engines and the overweight landing after an exciting day at work!
@tachacastilho3 жыл бұрын
@@pierre-olivierdebrogniez2155 That’s true! Maybe I got confused with a SINGLE ENG failure...but yes, landing ASAP should always be applied in this case. Thanks for the enlightenment! Safe flights.
@bilalberkan3 жыл бұрын
**laughs in 200 tons**
@danielbastidas22235 жыл бұрын
So they had an all-engine flame out and the lives of everyone in board is at risk. Germans: It was a little exciting
@msi48875 жыл бұрын
yeah. cause this is a simulator.
@safe-keeper10425 жыл бұрын
Germans: it's chill, we have checklists and routines ^^,
@x_x_x_x73674 жыл бұрын
@@msi4887 dont ruin that joke dude...
@goonerinSP4 жыл бұрын
@@x_x_x_x7367 his was funnier lol
@banger29984 жыл бұрын
world's 10 don’t do it don’t do it don’t do it control yourself.... R/WOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSSHHHHHHH
@ianz89625 жыл бұрын
"Engines not good, flame out" "okay"
@mobilemike735 жыл бұрын
They should make it really realistic and have ATC asking them to repeat the emergency because they weren’t paying attention to the mayday, and then have ATC bother them with souls and fuel on board and other stuff while they’re trying to run the checklists.
@MrMadFrench5 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣
@tomstravels5205 жыл бұрын
In reality the pilots can ignore ATC until a suitable time. They are not obliged to immediately reply to ATC. Aviate, Navigate, Communicate
@Sarah.Riedel5 жыл бұрын
Pilot: "Mayday Mayday Mayday dual engine flameout we are descending" ATC: "...Ahhh so you wanna declare an emergency or?"
@angelkilier4 жыл бұрын
@@Sarah.Riedel doesn't mayday call automatically declares an emergency?
@Sarah.Riedel4 жыл бұрын
@@angelkilier it's supposed to yes, that was the joke lol.
@SmokeyBCN4 жыл бұрын
"Just for info, Wir sind overweight, it's no big deal na?" their Denglish is hilarious.
@bongiovi76184 жыл бұрын
Well i prefer Denglisch instead of Frengliché!
@majstealth3 жыл бұрын
@@bongiovi7618 says the english speaking comunity after stealing words like "kindergarten"^^
@dombrown25305 жыл бұрын
Forgive my ignorance if this is wrong, but I love how the aircraft politely reccomends that you "LAND ASAP" on the message display... Just in case the pilot fancied a bit of a glide instead...
10 ай бұрын
Well, it actually happened a lot in the past that some pilots became over-focused on trying to restart the engines (which is possible but not guaranteed to succeed, sometimes at high altitude the engine core may freeze "locked" after a shutdown) that they decided too late to try to land instead. Now procedure is to try to land regardless, even if the engines restarted during descent.
@AlislugАй бұрын
I dont understand. It is correct no? Land ASAP whats wrong with it
@Kyuubi84020 күн бұрын
@@Alislug What they're saying is "isn't it obvious that you should land ASAP? there's no need for the checklist to state the obvious." But, no, there _is_ a need for the checklist to state the obvious. Emergencies are high stress situations, so it helps to make procedures super clear, and keeps pilots from having to overthink it.
@bro-rockmobamba286 жыл бұрын
zis is not gute
@Modswanted6 жыл бұрын
lol
@tuluksvui7475 жыл бұрын
I akree
@bobrvrvrvrv5 жыл бұрын
Hans vee aar fackt
@poppypeppa01865 жыл бұрын
That’s some german dudes they can’t speak well
@arisdelis15 жыл бұрын
Get to da Chappa Now!! Go!!
@Sneeb996 жыл бұрын
I wish I had this simulator in my back yard
@gatwickguy5 жыл бұрын
Manny L it’s dead cheap compare to real one plus cost of running and risk. Also you don’t have to worry about some treehuggers glued to runways,
@Operator_Fate5 жыл бұрын
once youre at a cruise level and AP is on and fmc is edited, there isnt much to do. its cool but not that worth it
@steveee25115 жыл бұрын
me directrly in bedroom
@joelangley79745 жыл бұрын
Bob I’m glad I don’t have one, I think the outside world would become non existent to me 😂😂
@CR47Ycam5 жыл бұрын
Might get a bit wet
@jckphotograph5 жыл бұрын
ETOPS: Engines Turn Or Passengers Swim
@slyfer53215 жыл бұрын
That's a very old joke and maybe older than you lol
@samsmith30255 жыл бұрын
More like sink
@robbie90825 жыл бұрын
Etops doesn’t apply in this situation
@cytrynowy_melon66045 жыл бұрын
@Angus Does Humanities Wendover makes generic movies on basic knowledge with this overused animation style, you give it too much credit.
@dimmittrivyev1475 жыл бұрын
Equip Parachute
@F-Man4 жыл бұрын
If I could have this simulator, nobody would ever see me again. I know that it’s a state of the art training tool, but holy hell would it be an amazing toy!
@aadityadatir64563 жыл бұрын
It runs on diesel, so it'll be expensive to use
@darkcraft4563 жыл бұрын
@@aadityadatir6456 wait what?
@KomradeDoge2 жыл бұрын
There's several across the US and you can buy flight time (or at least you could in the past IDK anymore).
@Lak62_101 Жыл бұрын
@@KomradeDoge In germany too. You can rent the Lufthansa Aviation Training Sims. From A380 to 747/400 they have everything lol
@gamestv48756 жыл бұрын
No checklist item to change underwear?
@Modswanted6 жыл бұрын
made my day lol
@thomaskurzer31486 жыл бұрын
That's the after Standing Checklist
@xxtravisxxify6 жыл бұрын
LMAO
@willwarden26036 жыл бұрын
As long as your ram air turbine comes out you have electrical power and hydraulics. That gives you enough time to get the APU started. As long as you’re near a runaway it’s doable. Overwater would be scary.
@EmotionalWeather5 жыл бұрын
Will Warden Isn‘t there a battery that covers until the APU is started or does it really depend on the RAM?
@ImplodedAtom4 жыл бұрын
I recommend this video to anyone with a fear of flying. The competence and professionalism on display is seriously impressive.
@rykehuss34354 жыл бұрын
And yet its human error that causes most accidents. Trusting your instincts instead of the instruments. Your instincts often lie to you in a plane, like you could feel like youre banking to the right when youre not, so you correct to left, thinking the instruments are broken.
@RAVIOLIdS Жыл бұрын
instruments dont lie we have various and the plane is made to not make this loss of space@@rykehuss3435
@ronaldaviation696 жыл бұрын
Such emergency scenarios truly shows us the importance of good CRM and swift decision making. Kudos to the pilots and thanks for sharing this awesome video :)
@herobo1234565 жыл бұрын
ya speaking both english and German on the flight deck is a great start for good CRM LOL
@TitusFFM4 жыл бұрын
Well I fought it stands for communicate react management
@markharris89293 жыл бұрын
@@herobo123456 they are all German. It’s fine. ATC and official coms all in perfectly good English and non SOP words in German also fine. You’ll find this all over the world in professional flight decks. English over the air, easing checklists and all calls and replies, and conversation in their national language. It’s how it is.
@craigduncan48263 жыл бұрын
IRL: “How many souls on board? Do you require fire trucks? Would you not be able to make it over to this other airport?” That’s what I always hear on these real life emergencies
@ThorstenInJapan3 жыл бұрын
Well, you could assume they cut that out to fit the flameout at cruise down to landing into a five minute video ;)
@jackg26304 жыл бұрын
Pilots are incredible under pressure, ik this is a sim but if you listen to cvr recordings of accidents the pilots almost always stay super calm and fight all the way to the end. People like to talk about crashes but the amount of malfunctioning planes that have been saved is incredible. For every crash, there was 500 successful emergency landings.
@ttvFairPlayerPL4 жыл бұрын
Somewhere in the future in 797 two engines flame out. Landing checklist: - Coffe & milk: set and check - Sugar: On and Available landing checklist completed.
@thecompany28364 жыл бұрын
Lol
@Mogry513 жыл бұрын
That’s standard on Swiss aircrafts - with a lil but of chocolate 🍫
@ttvFairPlayerPL3 жыл бұрын
@@Mogry51 hahaha :)
@777jones5 жыл бұрын
According to my video game experience, they should deploy chaff, fire missiles and drop their bombs.
@Cerberuselite4 жыл бұрын
777jones according to an old highly realistic simulator I played on the N64, they need to do a barrel roll.
@Inflamarie4 жыл бұрын
Reed20v ahhh yes, increasing speed by barrel rolling, Diddy king racing if I’m not mistaken
@ChiefBerry4 жыл бұрын
At least drop the bombs to reduce aircraft weight. Then no overweight landing???
@LogRol5 жыл бұрын
"Landing checklist. -Runway condition: Dry Landing checklist completed" lol Thanks for the likes guys ;)
@Elrs1715 жыл бұрын
Because it's an automatic fill checklist, it doesn't show all things already done. Another exemple is Parking Checklist : "Parking checklist - Parking Brake : On Checklist completed"
@LogRol5 жыл бұрын
@@Elrs171 I know
@henrychan7205 жыл бұрын
@@Elrs171 airbus in 10 years: aircraft startup checklist - start button.......push aircraft startup checklist complete
@edmondhung60975 жыл бұрын
Henry Chan Hey Siri,start the engine
@SkavenUK5 жыл бұрын
Missed the Final check - Trousers Brown? - Check.
@loltek42405 жыл бұрын
Engines died Capitan: ,,Ou uu this is not good"
@allamericandude156 жыл бұрын
According to that one Japanese CGI video that's been making the rounds on Reddit, the correct response to a dual-engine fire is to eject the fuselage which will land safely with a parachute while the rest of the plane crashes into a hill.
@Jamesnffc766 жыл бұрын
Crunge92 never specified if the captain went with the fuselage or they stayed with plane,
@germantobon54985 жыл бұрын
In most accidents nobody knows they’re going to crash, thats why that is useless
@E9X3305 жыл бұрын
@@germantobon5498 also most accidents happen during takeoff and landing, where that system would be useless
@TheGreenReaper Жыл бұрын
At least they managed to eject the core, seems like half the time when the Enterprise tries it something goes wrong.
@wownice1771 Жыл бұрын
According to that one CGI video from some random bugger on a demented site, the correct response to a dual-engine fire is to eject the fuselage from the plane at around 10s of thousands of feet while the still burning plane crashes onto unsuspecting crowds below
@ironqqq5 жыл бұрын
02:50 he's the Lufthansa pilot on the Lufthansa A350 documentary that you can watch on the infligt IFE.
@jemand84623 жыл бұрын
he's probably the fleet chief for the A350.
@GhasterMF6 жыл бұрын
It is nice to see how effective modern systems can support the pilots. APU auto-start, Engine auto-start. Why isn‘t there a auto-deploy of RAT? I would guess that this is the best and fastes way to make sure, that there is a power supply for the cockpit.
@pedram.mp46 жыл бұрын
it should deploy automaticaly when both engines fail. i don't know why they had to extend it manually
@MrMoccachinoo6 жыл бұрын
There is a system for it to deploy automaticly - but the reason for such training is, that systems can fail. So if it fails, you have to activate it manually.
@willwarden26036 жыл бұрын
They merely confirmed that the rat deployed it did deploy.
@lionnelmurimi6516 жыл бұрын
never expect it to deploy manually especially seeing as both your million dollar, high tech and super reliable engines both failed
@macieksoft6 жыл бұрын
Yep, preatty sure about that. Not only Airbus can deplay RAT automatically. IIRC Boeings can do that aswel. Also automatic checklist in the way Airbus does it seems very friendly and clear.
@Inatsikap2 жыл бұрын
Having the checklist come up like that is a big bonus rather than trawling through QRH!
@ThorstenInJapan Жыл бұрын
Yeah welcome to the 80s I guess xD
@raymondfredericeduardotto75156 жыл бұрын
Amazing teamwork! They did such a good hand in hand work! Well done!
@madezra644 жыл бұрын
This just gave me a new found confidence in flying. Lately I have been fearful of flying. I don't know why. I know statistically and all that stuff that you're more likely to die on your way to the airport then die in a plane crash but the difference between a plane crash and a car wreck is a 35,000 foot fall back to earth.. ANYWAYS it's extremely comforting to know that if both engines fail, we can still glide into an emergency landing. Still dangerous and deadly but survivable.
@VarunGupta30094 жыл бұрын
4:43 Me my whole life.
@starlinked6 жыл бұрын
What if the scenario brings them at the open ocean? Scary
@noeyewar6 жыл бұрын
In that case they will have a long swim home :-) Aircraft engines are however reliable enough that dual engine failure is very unlikely
@fly10636 жыл бұрын
Kenneth Brodersen Yeah, one of the main reason for dual engine shut down is when there was a miscalculation for fuel.
@officialvisaural6 жыл бұрын
I believe that ETOPS certification prevents this scenario from happening. All twin-engined planes are restricted to fly in certain areas only where they are a certain number of minutes away from an airport. This way, they will be able to land should an emergency occur.
@fly10636 жыл бұрын
Visaural Thats true but the pilots are responsibles for knowing how much fuel is left and for the glide to the nearest airport.
@rkan26 жыл бұрын
Visaural ETOPS is designed for single engine out however.. I think the maximum time usually is about 300-350 minutes. you. Airbus A350 can have ETOPS-370(minutes).. Basically this means the plane can fly 6 hours to it's diversion airport on one engine. Consequently this also means that it is impossible to be able to glide to an airport if flying with no engines and extreme ETOPS.. I'd vaguer the A350 can glide for about 200km depending on conditions. With a speed of 250knots, that'll only be around 25 minutes of flying.
@jonatancordoba79844 жыл бұрын
Would've been cool to re-introduce the dual engine failure below 2000ft. Just to watch some very fast decision making.
@takingafence5 жыл бұрын
: Everything Auto Restart : Check : Ill have one sugar and milk thanks
@Jay-hr3rh5 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile the passengers are talking about how quite the engines are.
@SimDeck5 жыл бұрын
Superb stuff. So professional. You guys deserve every penny you are paid.
@blueninja1153 жыл бұрын
That respirator is awesome! Awesome design. I wish my full face had that feature!
@gibbs-136 жыл бұрын
It was quite intense and stressing. I must appreciate my life playing only Ace Combat.
@camptube7621 Жыл бұрын
Amazing. How the airbus computers give them instructions is brilliant.
@Jay-hr3rh5 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile I'm stoned in the cabin listening to music.
@mosestomfelix3 жыл бұрын
Wow , everyone had done a great job , excellent approach and decision making....
@zzodr5 жыл бұрын
Lower collective, right pedal, pitch forward for best auto rotation speed
@mojeimja5 жыл бұрын
heli pilot detected
@dukenukem83814 жыл бұрын
bicycle chain falls off. right brake, both feet on the ground, proceed problem evaluation, grease on the hands check, engage right pedal for tensioning,proceed to your destination.
@scrull815 жыл бұрын
German pilots just saved the lifes of 350 passengers and crew: "slightly exciting". XD love it.
@avemflamma2 жыл бұрын
0:25 rat man on
@parrettfamily40414 ай бұрын
I had to look 3 times to see what you mean!
@_-_-_-_-_-_-_-__-29 күн бұрын
the nose on the FO is INSANE
@nothsim5 жыл бұрын
Great video. If you have the Pretrip and post trip break down I would love to be a fly on the wall. No one is perfect and would love to hear what the instructor had to beef about the sim session
@edgarblumenfeld9479 Жыл бұрын
Right seat had a gap in the visor of his O2 mask. Had he been under smoke he he would be in big trouble.
@JuanVanSteyvoort4 жыл бұрын
Fantastic job !... Great pilots make great landings... :-) From Brussels, with Love.....
@Sarah.Riedel5 жыл бұрын
I'm a little surprised the checklist didn't direct them to put on supplemental O2 masks immediately as like the first line item?
@sunnyyan10804 жыл бұрын
Since it's just an engine flameout, there's probably still a few minutes before the cabin altitude hits a dangerous level.
@Sarah.Riedel4 жыл бұрын
@@sunnyyan1080 I was under the impression most airlines changed their checklists so that putting on your mask is the first step after the South Dakota "ghost flight" Learjet incident in the late '90s, it was found that the pilots had waited too long to deploy their masks and had gone hypoxic leading to the crash and the deaths of everyone aboard. Even after just 30 seconds in reduced oxygen you can be seriously cognitively impaired.
@tomstravels5204 жыл бұрын
Sarah Riedel that was because the cabin altitude rose with the aircrafts altitude and exceeded 10,000ft because it wasn’t pressurised in the first place. In this scenario the cabin would be pressurised at 6000ft. When the engines failed the cabin altitude would slowly rise but not excessively so they’d have a few minutes until the cabin altitude reached 10,000ft
@toffonardi7037 Жыл бұрын
@@Sarah.Riedel this is qrh made by airbus
@Tomasz-pd3ru8 күн бұрын
People standing in the sim while motion is on. Very safe and professional.
@cageordie6 жыл бұрын
Nice automation. Very helpful aircraft. It is interesting to see European pilots are trained in proper communications technique. Americans know that Mayday is a word, but they almost never say it, just "declaring an emergency". And then never mention it again. This and the Thompson bird strike at Manchester Ringway are excellent examples of how you are supposed to make certain everyone knows you are in a life threatening position and need absolutely first priority handling. I have even heard an American in an emergency being given lower priority because ATC didn't know or had forgotten.
@user-wl6bw3jl4n6 жыл бұрын
"Declaring an emergency" is the equivalency of using ICAO's "PAN PAN" X 3 phraseology. There are some countries (e.g. USA, Japan, China) that do not recognise the term "PAN PAN" thus the only way to ensure priority assistance would be by either transmitting, "Mayday" X 3 (grave or imminent danger) or "Declaring an emergency". ATC will cease all airport movement (basically shut down the entire airport and alert hospitals at a high priority) if an aircraft declares a Mayday. If the aircraft downgrades the Mayday to a PAN PAN call after the non normal checklists are completed, then the airport authority will block one runway for the emergency aircraft and allow the airport traffic to resume operations. This is the reason why the Thompson birdstrike was told, " All runways available for landing". Had 'he' declared a PAN PAN, he then could've requested the longest runway available and it would be granted.
@thebiffer1005 жыл бұрын
You have to marvel at the ECAM procedures and it's ability to prioritize, was taught you do everything it tells you to .....good CRM
@opus4rv5 жыл бұрын
It's one of the reasons why most pilots regard the A350 as the most advanced airliner in the air today.
@paulbentley27095 жыл бұрын
Stressful watching even when you know it's a simulator
@mel8163 жыл бұрын
Especially when you have someone behind you watching and grading your every move😄
@markgorospe32234 жыл бұрын
dear santa, i want 1 simulator like this at my backyard.
@madriditunes70213 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile on a Swiss Airlines .... Mayday Mayday Mayday .... Someone forgot chocolates for us🤭
@STRICTO16 жыл бұрын
Excellent video, thanks. Also, the guy right at the end, standing up in the corner, is he a Swissair Pilot, he resembles and sounds like on of their Captains I`ve seen on KZbin? Thanks again!
@jsl151850b2 жыл бұрын
1:43 "We're doing our best to restart the engines. I trust you aren't too distressed."
@mohammedhageb95535 жыл бұрын
5:29 the Devil's smile 🤣🤣
@ilfordino-fordfiestatutori87252 жыл бұрын
Both engine cut out in the middle of nowhere "ooh, this is not good"
@Skyward27932 жыл бұрын
The most impressive thing is that they still have autopilot.
@sundar999 Жыл бұрын
There is battery backup and an emergency windmill generator called RAT
@AhmedAouidef16 күн бұрын
What a talent you have ! Great job !
@dianagaudreau91616 жыл бұрын
My only concern with the procedure is why do the pilots put oxygen masks on when they come near the middle/bottom of the checklist? Shouldn't it be the first thing the pilots should do before assessing an emergency situation when losing both engines? Just wondering....
@sneakytom74166 жыл бұрын
My thoughts would be there is enough oxygen in the cockpit to for the pilots to assess for a few minutes what's going on. Overtime, the oxygen supply would be depleted but the pilots will already put on the gas masks. So yeah I could be wrong here.
@butstough5 жыл бұрын
@ncsakany loss of engines --> loss of compressor bleed air --> loss of cabin pressure. however it might take some time for the remainder of the pressure to leak out.
@jesse00pno3 жыл бұрын
Wish I could spend several hours in that simulator! That would be a dream come true!
@aafootball8316 жыл бұрын
Nice video keep up the good work
@techmantra45215 жыл бұрын
Engines coming alive! You beautiful aerodynamic wonder you!
@crystalclear77994 жыл бұрын
Can we get serious now? They were expecting dual engine failures, they know how to react and know exactly where to land. You don't take human factor in real life when this really happens.
@pierreuntel19704 жыл бұрын
Sully
@DesmolightDesmo4 жыл бұрын
They didn’t, this was a test for instructors, making sure they know their shit. Often days the pilots don’t know if they will get a emergency, they changed it since sully.
@IroAppe4 жыл бұрын
They always know exactly where they land, since they discuss diverting airports along the whole route on briefing before the flight. So in case of an emergency, they immediately have their site to land for each point along the route. Of course it also depends on the immediate conditions.
@tomstravels5204 жыл бұрын
No they weren’t. And besides this ECAM action checklist is far more detailed than an A320 like sully’s
@Inquisite1031Ай бұрын
first of all, the exchange between Sully and the NTSB in the movie is fabricated and made for dramatization the NTSB were very much on Sully's side in the actual investigation the movie just vilified them for Dramatization, second pilots are prepared for dual engine failure, third what Sully in the movie was talking about was making the most optimal decision so as to land the A320 and that's impossible to do, but real world pilots are very very prepared for failures but yes they might not make the most optimal decision, they can get very close to the most optimal decision thats why checklists exist.
@UncleBoratagain4 жыл бұрын
Maybe try and conserve airspeed and even start accelerating ASAP? Significantly improving the airstart opportunity to support an APU bleed start?
@nielsdaemen5 жыл бұрын
Would be awesome if they could actually simulate a decompression by reducing the pressure in the simulator. This way pilots could be trained on the effects of hypoxia.
@albertalcasid675511 күн бұрын
how come they didnt pull out the qrh for overweight landing or was that part skipped?
@tl11466 жыл бұрын
"Land ASAP red" what a surprise LOL It´s hilarious it´s actually displayed on ECAM
@richbrit96112 жыл бұрын
Dual engine failure and stop having all instruments is amazing
@screaminlordbyron77675 жыл бұрын
Cool but I wanted to see the landing with no engines. Is that just me
@Ronaldo-nj9pi4 жыл бұрын
What a high pressure situation! Kudos!
@helenohenzo27786 жыл бұрын
i didn't know there is runaway in the middle of Atlantic ocean
@futilityroom5 жыл бұрын
Why is the instruction to use the oxygen masks not first on the list?
@Brooks__EU5 жыл бұрын
I think in that case there would still be enough oxygen in the cabin to do the other stuff beforehand
@zbx14255 жыл бұрын
I think because dual engine flameout only cuts the source of air bleed, so since this is not rapid depressurization, there is still quite a few minutes before the air pressure drop to a dangerous level. Therefore some more important things can be done before oxygen mask.
@futilityroom5 жыл бұрын
@@zbx1425 Ah, that would explain it. 👍
@speedkiller30265 жыл бұрын
that guy has the longest nose in the world
@tonyHern865 Жыл бұрын
"Pretty much the worst case scenario - both engines flame out at cruising level." Captain Sully : "hold my beer..."
@abnormaalz3 жыл бұрын
I would love to hear the pilots' reactions if this were to happen in real life
@philconey113 жыл бұрын
It would be about like this.
@JosephSeabourne3 жыл бұрын
It would look exactly like this, just in a real airplane.
@KomradeDoge2 жыл бұрын
Not the A350 but in the A320 the crew of US Airways 1549 had dual engine flameout at about 3000 ft. They were just as professional and collected in the cockpit voice recorder as these guys, and they had a lot less decision making time.
@hamptoninn48342 ай бұрын
Quick question. If vibration is showing an abnormal reading (which I would be considering potential damage), would that disallow for an engine relight?
@TheAirplanejunkie5 жыл бұрын
They Should of done a Dual Engine Flame out Landing, for good practice in an emergency of course the plane will fly on 1 engine gee its a no brainer
@accen7official8825 жыл бұрын
Do they use oxygen masks when engines fail bcos of the bleed air? Or whatever its called, all I do know is that air goes into the engine to be used as oxygen in the cabin and cockpit.
@Wekotin5 жыл бұрын
One Slash Boi Yes that’s the reason. With both engines out there is no bleed air for air cond packs and no pressurization of cabin. 10000ft is kind of safe limit altitude below which there is enough oxygen. Something to consider when flying over mountainous area that in case of emergency you can descend that low.
@JD-env16 жыл бұрын
Worst case scenario would be dual engine failure just after takeoff in a densely populated area...not at cruising altitude.
@bansheebug6 жыл бұрын
"Sully !, we've got a problem..." ;-)
@demonph_6 жыл бұрын
Look for flight cactus 1549 ;)
@ДмитрийКузьмичёв-н1й2 жыл бұрын
Очень рад снова увидеть у себя в рекомендациях видео про самолёты и пилотов,очень дисциплинирует💪💪💪👍
@cuneytpagel78476 жыл бұрын
würds nochmal für den a320neo üben :D
@drummerforlife78956 жыл бұрын
Cüneyt Pagel sind halt nur 330 340 und 350 Piloten aber bei den PW Engines sollten das am besten auch die Passagiere können 😂😂
@aerodaan6 жыл бұрын
Good teamwork, nicely done guys!
@cabc745 жыл бұрын
I wanted them to land with no engines at all! The engine coming back was anticlimatic. Of course if I were up there I would pray for the engines to restart, but this was a simulator.
@Bim0Mr5 жыл бұрын
Aircraft nowadays! To those (me included) who find themselves difficult to move on from A340, A300, MD-11, B767/757, B744, etc... you gotta let it go before being left far behind
@jsprdn6 жыл бұрын
I know this is only a simulator, but i'm sitting here scared as hell for these 2 guys, but wow did they handle that perfectly. I hope never to be a part of that experience.
It would have been interesting to see how they would have acted if the engines had not restarted
@ferrari2k2 жыл бұрын
"We may end up in the Hudson"... ;)
@dougall1687 Жыл бұрын
Gimli Glider
@Multimine2 ай бұрын
Surprised the autopilot didn't kick out after a dueal engine failure and all of the displays remained on too. Does the A350 have a really strong battery setup?
@tomstravels5202 ай бұрын
The RAT would have provided the power for the displays followed by the APU once it was running
@jools23235 жыл бұрын
1) Put oxygen mask on! Why is it so far down the list!?
@donutfavehd71275 жыл бұрын
Cause you don’t want the problem to get worse. The oxygen won’t run out that quick.
@msi48875 жыл бұрын
DonutFave HD But if it does you also get incapacitated really fast
@J.Stein15 жыл бұрын
It's not a rapid depressurization, as with a dual engine failure, only the bleed air source is cut off... Hence there is still enough oxygen and pressure in the cabin to do the most important stuff first...
@tomstravels5205 жыл бұрын
Because it’s not a rapid depressurisation. The air will leak out very slowly so you have time. If the cabin altitude passed 10000ft a new alarm would go off taking priority over the engine failure then they would put the masks on
@tomstravels5205 жыл бұрын
msi only when the cabin altitude warning passes 10,000ft or a check lists tells you do you then put the mask on. Air won’t leak out that rapid during engine failure
@RUSLexplorer20204 жыл бұрын
Wow! Interesting ! I like the colorful indicates in the cockpit !
@Deviloffateful6 жыл бұрын
that NOSE!
@luisgustavoviolilatam43386 жыл бұрын
hahahaha
@milk-it Жыл бұрын
Power lacing respirators like Marty’s power lacing Nike shoes - alright!
@tomglima5 жыл бұрын
GPWS Callouts: 50 40 30 20 Butter
@danieljamesgonzaga56533 жыл бұрын
Very Very VERY Realistic. I thought this was a real. Just WOW.
@dokt_ERR5 жыл бұрын
We are landing on Hudson.
@Jonas_Aa4 жыл бұрын
5:04 what does the throttle do more than engine power? Since both engines are out why play with the throttle?
@tomstravels5204 жыл бұрын
you must have missed the bit where they restarted the engines
@simonjacobson20546 жыл бұрын
They should do one where they've been hit by a heat-seeker.
@davidmorgan8442 Жыл бұрын
excellent flying. very impressive.
@lionnelmurimi6516 жыл бұрын
hot damn they did it so well it appears scripted (doubt it though) lovely demonstration.