Not pilot gods.Just real pilots.Just ask me where all my classmates are.They couldn't fly for shit.
@fjs11115 жыл бұрын
What I don't understand is why in the heck people actually click the dislike button. What's to dislike? The birds... Not enough birds? You wan't an Ostrich in the engine??? Great video!
@malachinewland65505 жыл бұрын
I want a pteranadon
@fjs11115 жыл бұрын
@@malachinewland6550 I'll be honest, I had to google that one. It's an extinct flying reptile though not a bird?
@malachinewland65505 жыл бұрын
@@fjs1111 I meant one flying into the plane
@lvsluggo0075 жыл бұрын
I think they're just being assholes...
@mustafashulqamy18443 ай бұрын
Back in the day when there were dislikes
@SKRUBL0RD6 жыл бұрын
So nice to see Captain Raps in this since he is retired. Always a joy to see him in any videos!
@AriefNugrohoRaden5 жыл бұрын
Birdstrike scenario. Pilot: calm Passangers: we're going to die
@justicewarrior91875 жыл бұрын
Let's see if the pilot remains calm if he had 3 engine failures!
@cptcrogge5 жыл бұрын
@@justicewarrior9187 Even 3 engines are OK if you manage to climb enough.
@asotelles5 жыл бұрын
yeah right
@thecompany28364 жыл бұрын
The a380 can fly with just 1 engine? Didn’t know that , I thought with 2
@ipechman4 жыл бұрын
I love this comment
@TH33QUALIZ3R6 жыл бұрын
This was strangely compelling to watch as it's pretty much the real deal and not just a PC flight sim. I think I speak for most people on here in wanting to see more vids like this and not only from Airbus but from other carriers and manufacturers too. Thanks for the upload! :)
@TheMicroPilot5 жыл бұрын
I know it's only a simulator but it's cool how chill they are going through the procedures!
@rorypullman5 жыл бұрын
I love these sim vids. They Really provide you with a procedure standard to follow.
@lvsluggo0075 жыл бұрын
For those who want to try their hand in one of these simulators, Delta has one at their museum in Atlanta, that you can "fly" for $400 for an hour. I believe its actually an old 737-200 simulator, which they kept when they got rid of their 737-200s..
@Лука-ю8д3 жыл бұрын
I went to the simulator in the video 2 years ago, it was really good, I was with my dad on internship.
@Lak62_1012 жыл бұрын
You can also rent the Lufthansa Aviation Training Simulators for private use. In Frankfurt you can fly the Simulator shown in the Video for 400€/h As well as Boeing 747, 777F, 787 (not sure about the 787) Airbus A320,A340 and in Munich you can go for the Airbus A350 and the CRJ1000.
@EmotionalWeather4 ай бұрын
@@Lak62_101 This is not the simulator in Frankfurt, though. Video description says Toulouse.
@prokastinatore3 жыл бұрын
Endlich wieder ein Beitrag mit Captain J.R.! Danke!
@Mike5006 жыл бұрын
[Wolfgang preparing a bird strike] Mad scientist laugh *muahahahaha*
@cristianoronaldosuiiiiiiiW5 жыл бұрын
LMAO
@jemand8462 Жыл бұрын
Just in case you’re wondering, the cpt was the chief pilot of Lufthansa at that time. So kinda knew what he was doing
@hansvetter8653 Жыл бұрын
Beeindruckende 3D Illussion! Was die Digitalisierung doch alles möglich macht. Sie rettet Leben! Hoffe das ein jeder Pilot regelmäßig solche Simulator Trainings durchläuft.
@floflyberlin73925 жыл бұрын
you need a cowstrike to get 380 engines on fire not a bird
@AhmadEdinHodzic5 жыл бұрын
Totally true
@AhmadEdinHodzic5 жыл бұрын
THis comment is so underrated
@Mike256545 жыл бұрын
You need no strike at all, they blow up all by themselves ;)
@epicgamer92955 жыл бұрын
@@Mike25654 u must be a Boeing lover..?
@aviationenthusiast57665 жыл бұрын
HAHAHAHAHA
@marty345345 жыл бұрын
5:49 _"Game over"_ - haha love it
@eightsprites5 жыл бұрын
- Engine fire number one. - Okey
@Akkuwechsler5 жыл бұрын
Immer noch das beeindruckenste Cockpit in der Fliegerei.
@N741SP4 жыл бұрын
Nice and smooth cockpit. Well done Crew...
@Hruk782 ай бұрын
Such professionalism! My hat off for you gents!
@Pilot_Frank6 жыл бұрын
JR, best pilot ever! Danke :)
@leerobinson5904 жыл бұрын
I thought that was Captain Raps
@Pilot_Frank4 жыл бұрын
@@leerobinson590 yes he is it! The "JR" are his initials of his first and last name;)
@silentgamer24345 жыл бұрын
5:20 that moment when your plane roasts you for no reason
@zolep93325 жыл бұрын
@Carpet Hooligan boomer
@ThatDamnPandaKai5 жыл бұрын
@Carpet Hooligan Unless you're in an anatomy class, saying that in class is going to make people giggle, so it's appropriate
@kwoods33795 жыл бұрын
Carpet Hooligan Ahahahahaha 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@silentgamer24345 жыл бұрын
Carpet Hooligan ok boomer
@MIKE-yr9pm4 жыл бұрын
@SilentGamer yeah how dare the flightdeck dude call cpt. Raps a retard like have some respect
@MrTruth1116 жыл бұрын
Could have made it to LaGuardia...
@seekthetruths225 жыл бұрын
Unable!
@camwest44775 жыл бұрын
Anything to the left in New Jersey ?
@tiltaubert53745 жыл бұрын
@@MrTruth111 we ending up in the Hudson
@xaviation51445 жыл бұрын
"Add a 30 second response time"
@TheBarnem135 жыл бұрын
@@camwest4477 yeah you got Tetobourgh of to your left hand side you wanna go to Tetoborough? Unable
@catalin24095 жыл бұрын
Herr Raps is one heck of a Captain!
@falconeaterf156 жыл бұрын
Would like to see a pilot say " Bird strike, engine fire, oh my god! We're all going to die!" Followed by hysterical weeping etc... Just to mix it up a bit.
@Salomotion5 жыл бұрын
But with microphones on :)
@Filekeepers5 жыл бұрын
falconeaterf15 that really made me laugh omg
@gavinward54485 жыл бұрын
falconeaterf15 It happens. I know someone who got a jump-seat on a busy flight and on landing the brakes or thrust reversers failed and the co-pilot freaked-out as he thought they were going off the end of the runway. They stopped with about 150m to spare (might actually have been on the over-run) but I think they had to evacuate the aircraft. Even pilots are mortal.
@wyattsutton5634 жыл бұрын
@falconeaterf15 The pilots know how to deal with everything; they know that if something happens, such as a bird strike or an engine failure, no one is going to die. They know what to do. I understand you're just being funny, but if you were a pilot and someone said that to your face, then how would you feel?
@ElDukeAy6 жыл бұрын
Not bad. Now do a simulation with 3 engines out.
@henrychan02226 жыл бұрын
Can a380 fly with one engine ?
@kaseykilsby16456 жыл бұрын
@@henrychan0222 It's designed to be able to.
@nielsmallant27106 жыл бұрын
@@kaseykilsby1645 it can fly with 1, but can't take off or climb with 1
@kaseykilsby16456 жыл бұрын
Niels Mallant I know, but they make it flyable with 1 engine
@luckyjazzy10606 жыл бұрын
Lol.
@stuartcraigon20035 жыл бұрын
Absolutely solid reaction. No fear or hesitation, communication excellent and clear.
@MrMilanoLau5 жыл бұрын
because it was a simulation.
@henriklmao2 жыл бұрын
@@MrMilanoLau nope. Because it is a pilots job to be like that.
@jamesmcinnis51845 жыл бұрын
I'm StArTinG ThE ApU We are landing in the Hudson
@CaptainTransit5 жыл бұрын
Dude, I thought I was the only one who thought of that once they turned the APU on. XD
@andreiciotir88185 жыл бұрын
If Sully didn't start apu, we were going to die
@AlonsoRules5 жыл бұрын
Sully didn't have to start the APU right away, but he did out of instinct. It was a masterstroke.
@charleslewing52865 жыл бұрын
Just turn it off, wait a few seconds, and turn it back on again. Should be fine!
@PilotJohnSilver5 жыл бұрын
On Windows computer this usually helps! xD
@ATCandMore1Ай бұрын
They handled it nicely in the cockpit but from an air traffic point of view they don't declare an emergency, which from what's going on in the cockpit it obviously is. Also, all they mention to atc is that they've an engine failure, no mention of the bird strike or the fact it's an engine fire. In the real world, we'd be asking if they were declaring an emergency (is losing one engine on a four engined aircraft one), also there'd be a lot more questions about their intentions, whether they needed any other assistance on landing etc, whether they need to hold etc. I understand how busy the cockpit workload is during emergencies (I've sat in on similar pilot emergency training sims), but having clear communication with air traffic is essential and this could've been added to the simulation.
@ayyanali25 жыл бұрын
Captain is one of the worlds finest jurgens raps 😎😭😭 , hands down on this guy
@captainzeppos4 жыл бұрын
You know then these guys are professional because they're keeping their cool. Any other flight sim gamer would have simply pressed Escape and then Restart.
@ezragreiner57735 жыл бұрын
The simulator actually mimics the tremor of the cabin while landing. how awesome!
@BisZwo5 жыл бұрын
by keeping the visual references straight on the horizon while making a climb or descent motion, they manage too fool your internal ear references and give you a realistic feel of accel or deccel ! It's pretty impressive the first time !
@ezragreiner57735 жыл бұрын
I wish there was a home version haha
@BisZwo5 жыл бұрын
@@ezragreiner5773 it goes from 2000€ to 4000€ for 2 persons for a 2x2h session. If you want one at home in your backyard, you can consider renting it! 😉
@motornaut6 жыл бұрын
Can we get serious now?
@angelsveils6 жыл бұрын
RundiF1 just realised where that was from and im glad
@raggedclawstarcraft65626 жыл бұрын
Captain?
@piggypiggypig17466 жыл бұрын
I'm not questioning the pilots, they're good pilots but they've clearly been instructed to head for the airport immediately after the bird strike.
@dermedizinfluencer Жыл бұрын
Jürgen Raps - The German Sully
@aky198320015 жыл бұрын
If the airbus looses all power theoretically, can a pilot still use the controls to operate it? Where would the plane get the power to send those electrical inputs to the control surfaces? APU?
@AviationHubOfficial5 жыл бұрын
There is an electrically driven backup pump for the hydraulic system, partly powered by the RAT (a turbine that automatically deploys in case of engine failure) so yeah it can be controlled in case of a dual engine failure. But it won’t be as responsive.
@tomstravels5204 жыл бұрын
If it lost all engines then the APU would restore electrical power with the batteries and the RAT filling in the gap whilst the APU started. Even if the APU failed the ram air turbine would restore one hydraulic system and provide enough electrical power. In worst case scenario the horizontal stabiliser is mechanically connected to the trim wheel and the rudder to the pedals so they can still pitch and turn. The A380 and A350 work slightly differently but that requires a pilot to explain as they don’t have trim wheels
@coryjeffreys51464 жыл бұрын
Great piloting guys
@ПавелИванов-э7п4 жыл бұрын
Bravo, Piloten.
@Thomas19805 жыл бұрын
wow! Great Video!!!
@ylpea51706 жыл бұрын
Impressive, makes an engine failure look like a walk in the park.
@68rastaboy6 жыл бұрын
Yeah, just like playing Call of duty safe at home...
@VivaMessico6 жыл бұрын
except this is how its in real life. if you are one of the passengers, you'd rather want the pilot to panic?
@68rastaboy6 жыл бұрын
@@VivaMessico Not to panic of course no...but there is no humanity in there, like the movie showed it well. No booms, no flames, no fear for your lifes... I'd like to see a real punitive test with multiple "unexpected" failures when it only comes to your license...not even speaking of your life...
@user-ky6vw5up9m6 жыл бұрын
Your drive to the airport is more dangerous than a single engine failure
@weeardguy6 жыл бұрын
I can completely relate to that. The first time I saw some major airline disaster being reconstructed on TV, with some big problem starting at 40000 feet, it felt so strange for me that the co-pilot just got a checklist out and started to go through every step there. Turned to my father who was like 'that's usually how it works. Unless there is immediate danger of a crash you forget about the checklist, but otherwise you get the checklist. It will usually tell you what to do to find the problem and (if possible) isolate that problem and land safely' But it completely defies your logic as a kid, when you think like 'shouldn't you go down as soon as possible?'
@spventures93955 жыл бұрын
Did this on FSX... Completed it...
@Musician_Robert5 жыл бұрын
Thats a beautiful simulator. Wow!
@CE11SCANАй бұрын
Love Jurgen Raps Legend
@ortundgaming9675 жыл бұрын
I need to be as calm in everything that I do as these guys. Engine's on fire? This is fine.
@MrLordwrecker6 жыл бұрын
That pilot was the first one to fly an A380 into SFO for Lufthansa.
@ChannelReuploads94516 жыл бұрын
Chief Pilot. He is also on the Board of Lufthansa, executive vice president of Operations (or was before retiring).
@norbert16364 жыл бұрын
I can guess that this A380 GW was somewhere near ZFW, surely not fuelled to fly to Australia. I don't know how long they needed to reach MLW. The other think is they sequence is from memory as I couldn't spot QRH
@peteconrad20773 жыл бұрын
No QRH be use they’re using ECAM.
@husky8216 жыл бұрын
You gotta factor in the human factor like turning on APU and response time - Captain sullenberger
@justicewarrior91876 жыл бұрын
It's probably cheaper to buy the airplane than the simulator..
@MarianKeller6 жыл бұрын
Not even close.
@edgarslacis38656 жыл бұрын
A380 costs about 440 million US dollars while A380 flight simulator costs about 13 million US dollars. So...
@Mr.Oblivian6 жыл бұрын
@@MarianKeller Hey, Marian? I think that was sarcasm.... And it went right over your head.
@MarianKeller6 жыл бұрын
@@Mr.Oblivian Maybe.
@justicewarrior91876 жыл бұрын
@@edgarslacis3865 Jesus 13 million??
@nathandurand80344 жыл бұрын
Thats urgen raps from the luftansa cockpit video to San Francisco love him
@AdelHaiba785 жыл бұрын
No fuel dumping needed??? ;-)
@edmondhung60975 жыл бұрын
Adel Haiba Maybe not full loaded fuel
@carloscardoso78895 жыл бұрын
I was about to ask the same question. A plane like that has to have a lot of fuel inside for an intercontinental flight.
@calixte125 жыл бұрын
Just before takeoff : "T/O 13L, left turn around landing 13L". So no fuel dumping
@Topper_Harley685 жыл бұрын
These planes has always alot of fuel onboard so very strange they did not dump fuel. A Quantas 380 had an engine failure and had to land with to much fuel, that did almost end in a disaster.
@lorenzocirci45685 жыл бұрын
usually when it comes to engine fire you want to land as soon as possible, confirmed at 2:10 by the ECAM action "land asap"
@barcxde11502 ай бұрын
Wouldn’t you want to do a turn into the good engines? They turned left when engine one failed (left side), I thought in case of failure always turn into the side that has more thrust. Or it doesn’t matter because engine 2 was okay?
@chuks0515 жыл бұрын
I salute all pilots in the whole world and also salute the human being that made plane I salute you all!!!!
@eli-janvanwijnbergen99056 жыл бұрын
Nice FSX setup :-)
@CinemaDemocratica6 жыл бұрын
Naive question from a rank amateur aviation enthusiast: Why didn't they need to dump fuel? I've seen a slew of these and the return procedure to which I'm accustomed is to vector out over open water and dump a bunch of fuel before returning to the airport. When the avionics said, "Land ASAP," do we take that to mean that fuel-weight rating had already been ruled out as a potential problem, by the avionics -- or would they have said that anyway, risking an AOCP?
@ThiccAhriThighs6 жыл бұрын
You're not going to dump (flammable) fuel after an engine fire. You land overweight and risk the damage to the plane. Early on, you hear them read out "LAND ASAP (RED)"; according to some people I've talked to, the red color of the text basically means you're in deep shit, and should be considering landing at military bases, abandoned airfields,, on highways, bodies of water, etc if you need to.
@sittingduck54772 ай бұрын
Jurgen Raps, lufthansas top pilot, no sweat..
@Canbugra7911 ай бұрын
U said heading we saw left turn, procedures missing and overjumped, atc com wrong, time management, rush landing etc etc
@Fabian_--iu4hm6 жыл бұрын
Das ist doch Jürgen Raps!!!!!
@reneoldenburg80226 жыл бұрын
Jipp leider schon in Rente. Habe beide Pilotseye Videos von ihm A340-600 von EDDM-KSFO und sein letzter Flug mit dem A380 von EDDF-KSFO 👍
@Fabian_--iu4hm6 жыл бұрын
Ja ich auch
6 жыл бұрын
Rappps, mit 3 "p"!
@Schutzengel646 жыл бұрын
Who the fck is Jürgen- Bekomme ich eine Autogrammkarte ? (drei wären noch besser)
@julessaviour59315 жыл бұрын
Dachte mir ich kenne ihn schon
@mci4life-r2v4 жыл бұрын
this is the pilot from piloteyes lufthansa a380
@lorimeyers3839 Жыл бұрын
Question as a non-pilot. When engine 1 is idled, what corrective actions need to be taken to ensure the plane doesn’t start to pitch over? Rudder? Aileron? Both?
@trueffelsucher Жыл бұрын
Mainly rudder. If any aileron input is required, the fly by wire logic of the Airbus adds it by itself.
@LKF-yb5dr5 жыл бұрын
Smartwings’ pilot: no big deal we continue as planned and we don’t inform anyone
@beaconterraoneonline6 жыл бұрын
Guess they don't simulate dumping most of the fuel before landing attempt, or can the 380 land fully loaded?
@user-pz5iu1tc5l6 жыл бұрын
No airliner can safely land fully loaded mate. But the fuel tank was damaged so maybe the jettisons were too. It would be able to land but it would be dangerous.
@benni69016 жыл бұрын
airbus cant dump fuel i dont know how it is on the a380 but i think it also can not dump
@09shadowjet6 жыл бұрын
@@benni6901 Depends on which Airbus. The A320 families indeed can't dump fuel, so does its competitor, Boeing 737. However Airbus A340, A350 and A380 do have fuel dumping capabilities. Some A330 (depending on the order) also have jettison to dump fuel but it's optional to the customer.
@seth19876 жыл бұрын
AviationHub 2 months ago They cheated. Pause at 4:23 , look at the right (or left) ND, the landing weight is that of the A380 MLW (391,000KG). So this theoretical flight wouldn't have made it across the atlantic anyway!
@aviation.london83026 жыл бұрын
Too low for fuel dumping. Especially over a highly populated area like Manhattan. It’s highly unlikely you will see any fuel dumping under FL100. Better to slightly damage the Airplane.
@nothsim5 жыл бұрын
Was turning into the dead engine part of the engine out procedure? Or is that only a problem with two engine aircraft.
@dustinpotter20355 жыл бұрын
I was looking for this comment. Had the same question.
@Aviator7384 жыл бұрын
it doesn't matter which side you are turning to.
@ghostLUKE696 жыл бұрын
I'm turning on the APU
@ukkomies1002 жыл бұрын
So they didnt need to dump fuel at all?
@PAL7373 ай бұрын
Why PM is touching the engine thrust levers during the procedure
@naumansajid86302 ай бұрын
part of the engine fire procedure is to shut down and secure the engine so he pulled the throttle back to idle.
@nyrongristwood5 жыл бұрын
Did I miss the bit when he informed cabin crew or passengers or are they just cargo
@rickerair54415 жыл бұрын
oh lol
@airops4235 жыл бұрын
A380 does not do cargo.
@gavinward54485 жыл бұрын
TechThatLasts No fuel dump either. ... maybe it was a ferry flight! (unlikely for Lufthansa from JFK). Maybe they don't spook the passengers. Just say the Captain left his phone behind.
@tomstravels5204 жыл бұрын
Gavin Ward as this is just a simulator and they’re dressed causal I’m pretty sure they knew what was going to happen and it would involve going back so didn’t need much fuel
@saintsljp15 жыл бұрын
Very smooth 👍🏻
@commercio35645 жыл бұрын
I would feel very safe with these two experts at the yoke. :)
@imMetallicOSM5 жыл бұрын
Arnò Mezzanotte Airbus 380 don’t have yokes ;)
@commercio35645 жыл бұрын
@@imMetallicOSM What do they have then? :)
@imMetallicOSM5 жыл бұрын
@@commercio3564 Joysticks!
@commercio35645 жыл бұрын
@@imMetallicOSM 😅 okay, now I know.
@Aviator7384 жыл бұрын
@@imMetallicOSM no, sidesticks!
@philipval3500 Жыл бұрын
Excellent video! Hey MS: winter in Detroit but fall in NY?
@SERGIO-cr6uy5 жыл бұрын
What happen if someone enters the cockpit and hijacks the simulator?
@victor360modena5 жыл бұрын
You have to pay the ransomin bitcoins
@petersilie74726 жыл бұрын
is it not better to reduce the thrust lever to idle immediately, since fuel flow is a major factor during compressor stall/surge to avoid uncontrollable fire or complete lost of power?
@AviationHubOfficial6 жыл бұрын
That's a really good question mate. And I don't know, but I'll give it a reasonable guess: I'd assume all fuel flow is cut-off to idle level on an engine failure/fire warning automatically, and it does seem to be the case: Pre-bird strike, pause@ 1:15 - look at the lower middle MFD/ECAM, the third green row is Fuel Flow (FF - KG/H), the number is illegible but visually identical to the other three on that row, as it should be. Engine failure registered at 1:26 , you can see immediately the FF has gone down to three digits already, consistent with idle power as if the levers were pulled instantaneously. So it makes no real difference what they do to the ENG1 lever at this point. Whether thats some automatic operation, or just because the engines have stopped! I don't know, but there has to be a logical explanation for the SOP. So the question should be, should the engine 1 MASTER be switched off immediately? Or manually disable the fuel pumps? and would that make a difference? We need an Airbus engineer in here. Also check the FF on ENG failure here kzbin.info/www/bejne/oKvNqqVmir9-iNk I have over-thought this. Look what you made me do @Daddy Kush!
@petersilie74726 жыл бұрын
You are probably right! This is what I thought, too. Maybe the FADEC reacts to the compressor stall/surge with an immediate fuel cut off automatically. I believe aircraft manufacturers are forward enough to implement such a system ;). Thanks for your detailed answer, @AviationHub!
@AviationHubOfficial6 жыл бұрын
No worries man, thanks for an insightful question that got me thinking about something I'd never considered before. Most of my inbox is a variation of "they just stick on autopilot and a computer does the rest" or "at 3 minutes the captain didn't... " *insert a procedure contained in no SOP/FCOM ever* ".... so it's refreshing ha :)
@wiedehopf90686 жыл бұрын
Shutting down the wrong engine is a major danger so engine shutdown procedures have quite a few steps. If you reduce the wrong engine to idle you should notice the loss of additional thrust or notice the mistake on the engine status page. Even more critical with twins. So no immediate actions because it increases the danger of this mistake.
@wiedehopf90686 жыл бұрын
Fuel cut off would be no fuel. Automatic engine shutdown via FADEC is reserved for overspeed conditions only. This is to avoid losing thrust in critical situations (double birdstrike for example). What i would suspect is in this case that the engine slowed down due to the engine damage and the fuel injected depends on RPM even before FADEC. So the engine turning slower means less fuel is injected. This video is an example of a quite serious bird strike, as soon as the bird hits the EPR gauge goes down to 0 within a second or so.
@FOZSKАй бұрын
no communication with the passengers?
@betterthantelly29935 жыл бұрын
Can you get a bedroom version of this?
@paulanderson795 жыл бұрын
You can have a real one for circa $20 million.
@techsupportranjit76376 жыл бұрын
Happy retirement Captain Raps :)
@landaxe24 жыл бұрын
no quick landing/go around briefing due to asymmetric thrust?
@VassilliHD5 жыл бұрын
I wonder what costs more, the plane or the simulator?
@yannisl82595 жыл бұрын
Plane 400million, sim 13 million
@waterspray57435 жыл бұрын
Doesn't matter to me, I can't afford either. lol
@sientguy5 жыл бұрын
How can you confirm a thrust lever/fire switch by yourself..?
@elite765 жыл бұрын
No. Thrust lever must be verified by both pilots and actioned by the PF, engine master switch requires dual confirmation (actioned by PM) if in flight.
@shehajeez13 жыл бұрын
Even looking at the cockpit im like how did engineers come up with this?
@greenhell80865 жыл бұрын
Jürgen Raps was the first person how flights the first A380 by Lufthansa or?
@valentinbohm7575 жыл бұрын
Yes
@pabloalejandrovegaquevedo9494 жыл бұрын
What very good exelent
@FriesyRider Жыл бұрын
War mit dem "Cleared" von ATC auch bereits die Landung mit inbegriffen, oder wurde Cleared for Landing nur nicht im Video gezeigt?
@maxajames5 жыл бұрын
How do they simulate acceleration with the simulator? I mean, how can we get the feeling of acceleration using hydraulics?
@maxajames5 жыл бұрын
@Emb_Review Yeah. That makes sense. Thanks for the explanation!
@papanoel39995 жыл бұрын
Captain raps.legend.
@RamPianoCovers5 жыл бұрын
nice simulations
@ikeyuni9244 жыл бұрын
love this information
@lesgold985 жыл бұрын
If flight schools wouldn't cost thousands I would do everything to become an air pilot :(
@mac8125 жыл бұрын
Amazing Insanity there’s special programmes were an airline trains you, and you the pay of the cost when you start working :)
@mehmetfatihbozkurt13635 жыл бұрын
Moo Chini for example? For poor people like us :d
@dannyfranco235 жыл бұрын
If you really wanted to be a pilot you’d do the research and know lmao. Some countries offer student loans that you can pay off with minimal interest after a few years which is good
@mac8125 жыл бұрын
de fan exactly, but I’ll tell you british airways do it for example, a lot of airlines do loans that you can pay of later
@furkancecen96955 жыл бұрын
@@mehmetfatihbozkurt1363 Yanlış hatırlamıyorsam 4 yıllık sayısal mezunların girebildiği fakat son yıllarda talebin artmasi sebebiyle sözel ve açıköğretim mezunlarına da hak tanındığı Türk Hava Yolları Akademisine katılabiliyorsun. Eğitimini tamamlayıp THY'de pilot olursan maaşından 10 yıl boyunca 140.000 €'luk eğitim masrafı kesilerek karşılanmış oluyor.
@ComdrStew5 жыл бұрын
Will this work with MSFS2020? Might have to buy one when I win the Lottery.
@ChristieNel4 жыл бұрын
This is where you're glad it's just a simulation and go rethink your career when you imagine in real life the fire probably wouldn't go out and your wing would have burnt off.
@Mehmet-15KLNC5 жыл бұрын
Perfect pilot👏👏👏😀
@K4rlK0ch3r2 ай бұрын
You know the rules. Aviate, Navigate and Cummunicate in this order. But even though this was a simulation, they should also simulate to inform the passengers. This takes too much time in many situations where you might be fearing for your life to end very soon.
@JustinLieber5 жыл бұрын
What does the beeping at 4:55 mean? I always can't find an answer for it.
@VictorSilva-qf2tu5 жыл бұрын
It means that something changed. Some configuration in the PFD is different now that the autopilot is disengaged
@AviationHubOfficial5 жыл бұрын
It indicates a mode change. In this case disengagement of the AP. You might also hear it if the aircraft is turning through a planned route and goes to heading mode, or if the aircraft is climbing through a planned profile, and something causes it to go into an open climb.
@sq84094 жыл бұрын
Change in landing capability in this case. In normal operation on ILS approach, CAT 3 landing capability is available but as soon as you disconnect the AP, the landing capability downgrades to CAT 1 so the click sounds. Another cause of the click is mode reversion not intended by the pilot. Due to route discontinuity, for example,triple click sounds when NAV reverts to HDG.same goes for Vertical mode reversion. (OP CLB to Current V/S,for example when you are in Open climb and set lower altitude than current altitude) I hope this helps you.
@dude41735 жыл бұрын
On the Engine No. 01, fire, push button, push, he should have technically pushed the button before the captain confirmed the button was pushed. How do I know this? I don't, I'm making it up like all the other people are doing in these comments.
@fvigerАй бұрын
No fuel dump on a Super Heavy that remains with 3 engines ????
@scuddrunner15 жыл бұрын
Did I miss the dump fuel part?
@Topper_Harley685 жыл бұрын
Was also wondering why they did not dump fuel.
@nmarcel5 жыл бұрын
I wonder... if the burned engine had been the second, that with one of the two thrust reversers of the A-380, would the landing have been so easy?
@AviationHubOfficial5 жыл бұрын
That's interesting, they may have had to not use any reverse at all, I'm not sure of the SOP. Regardless, with the runway lengths at Frankfurt, they'd have been fine with spoilers and autobrake.
@rt_superstar3 жыл бұрын
*Wolfgang preparing a Bird Strike Wolfgang: 😏
@mel8163 жыл бұрын
Too bad driving exams don't have something similar with on-demand moose/elk strikes😄
@drivethru75655 жыл бұрын
How much is subscription for A380 simulator?
@hieristderkanalvomyoutuber53875 жыл бұрын
Habe mal eine kurze Frage zum Ausfall der 1 Turbine ( Motor) Wehre es nicht Leichter die Drehzahl der Turbine 3 u. 4 zu minimieren anstatt die Klappen Steuerung zu verändern ? Bei Gleicher Drehzahl der 3 Motoren möchte das Flugzeug doch nach Links Fliegen und Deshalb würde ich es vielleicht ohne Klappen Steuerung Probieren die Fluglage durch Die Motoren Drehzahl Anzupassen. MOTOR 4 Kleinste Verfügbare Leistung Stellen. Leistung Motor 2 Etwas Erhöhen und Das Flugzeug müsste wieder mit Optimaler Trimmung Fliegen. Aber vielleicht ist das Notwendig das mindestens 3 Motoren Leistung haben müssen um das Flugzeug sicher zu Fliegen. Sonst kann man Noch Treibstoff in die Rechte Trag Fläche Pumpen. Dann Kippt das Flugzeug auch wieder Horizontal. Mfg Michael aus Hamburg. 💡
@Hansi6895 жыл бұрын
Ich bin kein Pilot, aber ich kann zumindest logisch denken! Wenn ich ein so schweres Flugzeug auf Höhe bringen muss und mir beim Start 1/4 meiner Leistung flöten geht, werde ich alles tun um die Maschine in der Luft und Balance zu halten, aber bestimmt nicht die Leistung meiner restlichen 3 Turbinen senken.
@hieristderkanalvomyoutuber53875 жыл бұрын
@@Hansi689 Nur die Leistung einer Turbine Zurücknehmen. Und Den Ansteigwinkel gleizeitig Vermindern. Es kommt immer darauf an in welcher Fluglage sich das Gerät befindet und Welche Flug Manöver man Ausführen könnte um Ein Stabiles Flug verhalten zu bekommen. Wenn 1 Motor aus fällt ist Auf der Anderen Seite Des 50% Mehr Leistung vorhanden. Das bringt das Flugzeug in eine Kurven Lage. Diese Kann man Durch die Ruder Steuerung oder Durch Verteilung der Motor Leistung kompensieren. Wenn das Flugzeug eine Bestimmte Höhe erreicht hat kann es Auch bestimmt nur mit Zwei von Vier Motoren Sicher Fliegen. Die Zusätzlichen Motoren sind nur für Schnellere Geschwindigkeiten und Größere Flug Höhen von Nöten. Umd Natürlich Verkürzten diese auch den Brems Weg durch die Schuppumker Steuerung der Motoren. Also wird das Flugzeug Versuchen Lange zeit zu Kreisen um Leichter zu werden. Kürzere Landung Zeit wird dann erreicht. Flugzeuge sind Eine Technische Meisterleistung vom Besten Nur das Beste verbaut. Und Alles ist Doppelt bis Dreifach Gesichert. Ausfälle von Geräten gibt es immer wieder und das ist normalerweise auch kein Problem wenn die Piloten und die Mechanik Richtig zusammen Arbeiten. MfG Michael aus Hamburg. ✈
@Hansi6895 жыл бұрын
@@hieristderkanalvomyoutuber5387 Danke für die Ausführliche Erklärung. Es beruhigt mich zu wissen, dass die, die von der Materie Ahnung haben im richtigen Moment wissen was zutun ist. Das ist auch der Grund warum ich überhaupt in ein Flugzeug steige. Ich sage mir immer, die Jungs und Mädels haben ein strenges Auswahlverfahren durchlaufen (hoffentlich) und die Ausbildung war Schweine teuer.
@yariwes5 жыл бұрын
Shouldn't the first officer have declared Mayday while calling ATC after the strike?
@henrikaleksandernilsen63885 жыл бұрын
5:22 When your aircraft knows everything about you
@mcscootie6 жыл бұрын
how much is this simulator, I want to buy one
@AviationHubOfficial6 жыл бұрын
About $10 Million at least
@mcscootie6 жыл бұрын
AviationHub i think I'll get 2 then 😁
@theVakhovske6 жыл бұрын
@@AviationHubOfficial for $10m I can lease a320 or a319
@windshearahead70126 жыл бұрын
AviationHub more than 16 million
@LuckyPikinini4 жыл бұрын
My dude you can buy a buggati, lafarrari, a mansion and a limozine with that