Alert: S-70 Okhotnik Stealth Bomber Drone Spotted Over Ukraine? Western Radars Can’t Detect It!

  Рет қаралды 558,012

Military TV

Military TV

10 ай бұрын

The S-70 Okhotnik is a formidable stealth drone, designed to carry a variety of air-to-surface missiles and bombs within its concealed body, minimizing its radar signature. Its unique design allows for covert operations without the need for external weapons pylons. The drone's blended wing-body horizontal configuration, reminiscent of the renowned B-2 bomber, further enhances its stealth capabilities and may provide additional capacity for heavier payloads. This sleek design, free from protruding structures and sharp angles, significantly reduces its radar visibility, making it a challenging target for ground-based air-defense systems.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv

Пікірлер: 1 500
@sakshambhadauria5709
@sakshambhadauria5709 10 ай бұрын
The wingman concept is just amazing.
@professorg8383
@professorg8383 10 ай бұрын
Yeah because operating one advanced aircraft, is just too easy!! if they build a dozen of these that will give them about two for each serviceable SU-57!! Sorry, but I just can't imagine this being a remotely logical tactic. Russia has already proved that their "advanced technology" is 2 decades behind the West. None of hs fancy stuff works with out western supplied electronics. They are robbing processors out of imported refrigerators and microwaves, to put in weapons! Russia only has one real electronics supplier and it's a state run company that isn't very good. They do have a few small high tech private businesses, but they can't make anything without western supplied electronics. More Russian make believe hype!
@doofyler
@doofyler 10 ай бұрын
It's just cgi
@davidburke5782
@davidburke5782 10 ай бұрын
Moskva
@_Coffee4Closers
@_Coffee4Closers 9 ай бұрын
It's almost like you think they came up with the idea or have that capability or something. 🤣
@professorg8383
@professorg8383 9 ай бұрын
@@_Coffee4Closers They didn't and they don't!! Although the "wingman" idea probably is Russian. And if you play out that idea in a practical sense, it's really a dumb idea. The Russian military designers are dreamers, putting concepts that look good on paper, but that they are incapable of producing. Think Su-57, T14 Armata tanks and of course the "unstoppable" hypersonic missiles that have proved to be easy pickings for Patriots! They probably executed some engineers over that failure to deliver!
@MGZetta
@MGZetta Ай бұрын
When you can casually test your new weapon just over the borders.
@EtoumanGuillaume-qp6rz
@EtoumanGuillaume-qp6rz 18 күн бұрын
They learn from America last 70 yrs of war abroad. Thanks Uncle Sam
@Djkommode
@Djkommode 7 күн бұрын
@@EtoumanGuillaume-qp6rzI mean our war tactics are online and they can’t defend against us still.
@joostesselink2780
@joostesselink2780 7 күн бұрын
You misspeld as far away from nato awacs planes as possible
@silversurfergw
@silversurfergw 10 ай бұрын
One thing is for sure . This conflict has not been good for the mercenaries fighting for Ukraine... they just not accustomed of being shot back at.
@Stephen-bq4nq
@Stephen-bq4nq 10 ай бұрын
Yeah Wagner has certainly had a tough time 😂
@tedrow70
@tedrow70 9 ай бұрын
You mean the Russian mercenaries 😂 ex western vets are not running from them
@Titoscudd
@Titoscudd 9 ай бұрын
​@Stephen-bq4nq they cleaned Ukraine's and NATO's clocks! Took Bakhmut in spite of the massive investment of resources and manpower to secure and defend it
@Stephen-bq4nq
@Stephen-bq4nq 9 ай бұрын
@@Titoscudd it took months and tens of thousands of dead to take a small city and that was with superiority in artillery and airpower. And after all that they can't even advance past it because their flanks aren't secure. The icing on the cake is the boss of Wagner had a meltdown after seeing all his casualties and turned on Putin and now Wagner isn't even in Ukraine. Keep coping🤡
@pogo1140
@pogo1140 9 ай бұрын
@@Titoscudd in about 5 months and another 5 months before that. Meanwhile, the Ukrainians are moving around the city to surround it.
@avengerpz
@avengerpz 10 ай бұрын
OMG ... so many "military experts" here that live in Star Trek and think stelth automaticly means it have Romulan cloacking device or something ...........
@HideeyeeL
@HideeyeeL 10 ай бұрын
So it doesn't 😧
@FerNando-ys5hc
@FerNando-ys5hc 10 ай бұрын
They're been fooling around but still you know how kids are lol
@zulfanirich7594
@zulfanirich7594 10 ай бұрын
cloak engaged
@avengerpz
@avengerpz 10 ай бұрын
@@zulfanirich7594 "warp core breach is immenent"
@neolord50pro77
@neolord50pro77 10 ай бұрын
⁠@@zulfanirich7594”Red alert! Load the torpedo bays, ready phasers!”
@emmanuelsello3419
@emmanuelsello3419 9 ай бұрын
Onother state of the art Shovel. Ukraine should prepare for a peaceful end to this conflict.
@IKnowWhereYouSleep--3
@IKnowWhereYouSleep--3 2 ай бұрын
looks like the first 6th. Generation shovel!
@bobbybeeman7280
@bobbybeeman7280 Ай бұрын
Ukraine has no say so over this mater. US Pres Biden and the Super rich who run this world are controlling it. There are to many USA hidden Bio chemical plants and Pharma plants involved to let it go. The owners of these plants make billions off of their products so will fight to the bitter end. They use there bio chem plants to feed people unknowingly food and medical additives to get people hooked on their drugs and have many tools for their trade like the World Health Organization being the chief tool of distributors.
@stanleylexxtweedle3555
@stanleylexxtweedle3555 Ай бұрын
Do you have authority or knowledge to tell what Ukraine should do? Did you noticed Kremlin regime openly declared elimination of Ukrainian identity as a goal?
@LordWyrda
@LordWyrda Ай бұрын
@@stanleylexxtweedle3555 Every day of war that the Ukrainian Nazis refuse peace will cost more territory. The Russians will win no matter what. It's all about how many people mass murderer Zelensky sends to die and how much he wants to destroy his country.
@RochefortTrappist
@RochefortTrappist 25 күн бұрын
All 2 of them are very scary!!
@Republic3D
@Republic3D 10 ай бұрын
The SU-57 drawback so far has been the round thrust vectoring engine nozzles, which make the aircraft easier to detect. But they've now developed square thrust vectoring engine nozzles and begun installing them on the aircraft which should significantly increase the stealth capabilities. As you can see in this video, the S-70 also currently has a round nozzle, while the schematics of the same drone feature a stealthy nozzle. It might be that the same design as on the SU-57 will be implemented on the S-70 as well.
@tarkgundogdu8940
@tarkgundogdu8940 10 ай бұрын
I think they should do it in elliptical shape to suit the shape of the air plane.
@lukewhitehouse4103
@lukewhitehouse4103 10 ай бұрын
And the new Su-57 gen 2 has completely smoothed surfaces and a RAM coating reducing RCS and reducing detection distance head on.
@teicangigi559
@teicangigi559 10 ай бұрын
Duzele rotunde într-adevar sunt dezavantajoase, dar vectorizarea în conncepția rusească pleacă de la ideea twin engines. În fapt este vorba despre o vectorizare independentă pentru fiecare motor. Astfel, fiecare motor are o vectorizare independentă, fiecare motor poate direcționa jetul în mod circular la un unghi de 15 grade fața de linia orizontalei. În asemenea condiții, avionul are o semnătură termică mai mare, dar compensează cu o excepțională manevrabilitate, care depășește anvelopa alpha de zbor (cea sigură pentru pilot), fără să intervină sistemul fly by wire ca la aparatele occidentale.
@davidburke5782
@davidburke5782 10 ай бұрын
​@@lukewhitehouse4103- Do they have more than ten ???
@lukewhitehouse4103
@lukewhitehouse4103 10 ай бұрын
@@davidburke5782 I don't know the exact production number, but I would say do they need them? They are not in a war with the West (yet) and against Ukraine their Gen 4 Flankers are more than enough. Russia cant produce the Su-57 to the numbers of the F-35
@vandasaragosa
@vandasaragosa 10 ай бұрын
Combat proven even before mass production wtf lol
@PeterLamin-bw5rs
@PeterLamin-bw5rs 10 ай бұрын
😂 F 35 the flying submarine with Chinese brakes 😁😁😁
@muhammadridwan-yb3vq
@muhammadridwan-yb3vq 10 ай бұрын
@PeterLamin-bw5rs And Chinese magnet too 😂
@andrew_koala2974
@andrew_koala2974 10 ай бұрын
It was done on WEDNESDAY - THURSDAY - FRIDAY You have to understand that there exist TEST simulators
@miked9260
@miked9260 10 ай бұрын
Going through speed track 😊😊😊😊😊
@laughingbuddha1926
@laughingbuddha1926 10 ай бұрын
It was already tested … don’t you heard that on June month this same drone damaged Ukrainian ammunition facility centre.. plz check your ears from doctor 😂😂I think there is some issue 😅😅😅
@robertbaisagale1685
@robertbaisagale1685 10 ай бұрын
The Russian have always been good at building beautiful formidable fighter jets
@rharris4736
@rharris4736 10 ай бұрын
Their "beautiful, formidable fighter jets" have been getting shot down by spare parts and scraps for the entire length of the war.
@Republic3D
@Republic3D 10 ай бұрын
@@rharris4736 Let me guess, Ghost of Kiev was real 🤣
@rharris4736
@rharris4736 10 ай бұрын
@@Republic3D 128 terrabytes of video footage and around 3.2 million eyewitnesses confirm that the answer is yes. And while we're at it, the Earth is round and dinosaurs were real. It's called science, child. Borrow a book from someone who actually made it out of the fifth grade, and look it up.
@yastyman
@yastyman 10 ай бұрын
@@rharris4736 so you found out that planes are shot down in combat? Awesome, looks like you actually read the book.
@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab
@Peter-Oxley-Modelling-Lab 10 ай бұрын
Nothing very stealthy about that jet nozzle...
@RickyJr46
@RickyJr46 10 ай бұрын
"The delicate balance of the conflict" is essential to keep this long-term money laundering operation going…
@paulskopic5844
@paulskopic5844 10 ай бұрын
BINGO
@saeedmustapha1334
@saeedmustapha1334 10 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣👍👍
@oriontukal
@oriontukal 10 ай бұрын
​​@@The_Funguseatero such thing as freedom..... ur government shows that 😢😢😢😢😢😂😂😂😂😂 plus karma
@robertmontgomery3892
@robertmontgomery3892 10 ай бұрын
Amen. You nailed it.
@roberthaines4221
@roberthaines4221 10 ай бұрын
You're referring to _Russia,_ of course...
@birtybonkers8918
@birtybonkers8918 10 ай бұрын
There are a lot of comments that miss the real point of stealth. Stealth does not mean undetectable. Low detectable to some extent, but all stealth aircraft are detectable by radar. Specifically, stealth technology does not work particularly well against low frequency radar. So the real advantage for stealth aircraft is that it is very difficult to get a radar lock on them. Radar lock needs high frequency radar and stealth works pretty well in reducing radar returns to high frequency radars making radar lock difficult. The question then is how stealthy do you need to be. Russian stealth technology is definitely inferior to US stealth but Russians emphasize building planes that are highly maneuverable while US expects to win in BVR engagements. We’ll see which works out better at some point, perhaps.
@thewedge8823
@thewedge8823 10 ай бұрын
American stealth has never been tested against brand new Russian air defense systems... particularly the S-400, and the upcoming S-500. Stealth will not work against those at all.
@jozefhorvat3625
@jozefhorvat3625 10 ай бұрын
Absolutely true mate 👍👍👍
@Reflect02
@Reflect02 10 ай бұрын
​@@thewedge8823US banned all pilot to come near S-400 lol
@ivicamilosavljevic4706
@ivicamilosavljevic4706 10 ай бұрын
That "Ohotnik" drone is not stealth... Particular problem is engine exhaust, that is mounted just like when kids create r/c plane. It is visible by all usable IC devices, even the oldest ones. I once followed 4 airplanes for kilometers, with my CAT S-60 telephone FLIR camera, while it was operational (using this comment, to mention that it was not water and impact resistant, as it was advertised! Water entered easily, and a small impact destroyed it! ). That UAV has a good weight over engine strength ratio, that allows it to carry a lot of ordinance, and if You attach to it some good gliding bombs or cruise missiles, that can be fired far from the target, that's OK, but there is no way to use it as some deep penetrator to the enemy territory, without air dominance. Let's go back to 1999. Yugoslavia, where we downed one (Grounded on our territory) , and damaged the other two F-117 at a time, 25 yrs ago, state of the art, stealth fighters. There are other planes damaged and downed like F-16, B-2, A-10, and some more... we could have done better, but threats from US military generals, towards retaliation to the civilian population stopped us in our effort, even to prevent extraction of the downed pilots (of course, we wouldn't harm them, as we didn't dose 3 guys captured on the ground, that were released in a few days)...In any case, US has "lessons learned", we do also. Some other countries, And blocks of countries - also... Time will show what is more effective and needed... In my humble opinion, stealth aircraft, with their incredible funding, were usable, and made success during the Irak attack only, after that became obsolete. There showed complete potential, in collaboration with false target drones, launched at the same time during first nights, to prevail in the air. Nowadays, tactics and strategy are way different... time will show, in any case... All of us learned something, so we will see. More important by me is how much all of that costs! Some people don't have to eat, some are in credits, economies are falling, because governments invest in stealth and new technologies, frightening their population, while they are living on the yachts, and private islands... War is not that terrifying! Actually it is, but it's unneeded...I was involved 3 times, but it is easier to go, and finish it in a few years, and continue your life, than to suffer all life long, paying someone, for something that You don't understand, and it's unneeded, just that they could make their way of living... ;)
@alexomar2010
@alexomar2010 10 ай бұрын
Su-27 and su-35 have intercepted US f-35 so it means US is not ahead from Russia in terms of stealth advancements, f-35 is the US stealthiest fighter aircrafts.
@Petrov77730
@Petrov77730 10 ай бұрын
Русские настолько брутальны, что подбивают Брэдли и Леопард ради микросхем для своих стиральных машин.
@zigbeegooblesnort125
@zigbeegooblesnort125 10 ай бұрын
Yep the Soviets are Klingons.
@maksimluzin1121
@maksimluzin1121 10 ай бұрын
@@toliklisiy5868 , Klingons is a Civilization of cyborgs from one old computer game...
@maksimluzin1121
@maksimluzin1121 10 ай бұрын
@@toliklisiy5868 , I'm 50+ as well, I don't play computer games for 20+ years, as I can remember it, but _that_ game I remember very well, it's _very_ old, the first release, if I'm right, was on the black&white variant of monitors (even without graphics, but with pseudo-graphics)...
@beastlegion2965
@beastlegion2965 10 ай бұрын
Katsapu kykarekayut I sobirayut rakom kliukvy v kokoshnik v kotorui ya vchera nasral
@beastlegion2965
@beastlegion2965 10 ай бұрын
@@toliklisiy5868 skolko vchera kliukvy nasobiral? Any priznavaicya laptenogii katsapelo. Skazhu po bratski a...
@alexeishayya-shirokov3603
@alexeishayya-shirokov3603 9 ай бұрын
It would be interesting to know if the Okhotnik carries an onboard radar, and if so, if it can effectively extend the detection/engagement range of it's parent Su-57.
@globalterroil3208
@globalterroil3208 9 ай бұрын
"...During the flight, the UAV interacted with the Su-57 to test extending the fighter's radar and target designation range for long-range air-launched weapons outside enemy air defence coverage, the MoD reported...." (Jane's 360, Sep 27, 2019, _Russia’s Okhotnik UAV makes first flight with Su-57_ )
@pravindahiya719
@pravindahiya719 6 ай бұрын
a 25 ton drone - without a radar ? how can you even imagine that ?
@malcolmt7883
@malcolmt7883 10 ай бұрын
I wonder if we'll get some sort of drone carrier aircraft in the near future, since small drones could have a much longer range if they were launched at high altitude.
@georgepantazis141
@georgepantazis141 10 ай бұрын
There already Here.
@shresthishigwcivpadt9713
@shresthishigwcivpadt9713 9 ай бұрын
@@georgepantazis141 No
@stradorious4467
@stradorious4467 4 ай бұрын
Russians want to turn some of their SU-57s into drone carriers. (Irl arsenal bird be like)
@Chimnaay
@Chimnaay 3 ай бұрын
Like in Starcraft….a giant floating aircraft carrier that unleashes thousands of small drones. That paired with a EW asset to hide its signature as it hunts targets would be a scary sight.
@ClaudeMagicbox
@ClaudeMagicbox Ай бұрын
It's to me pretty clear that the future of combat aviation are high-flying fast and stealth "mothership platforms", like an evolution of todays AWACs planes with a dozen of drone operators on board + SigInt and Comm personnel to network battle information from satellites and ground radars. The "motherships" don't necessarily deploy the drones themselves but rather manage swarms of large ground based Okhotink style drones (and possibly also can deploy a certain number of smaller defensive drones to protect themselves while in flight).
@umu8934
@umu8934 10 ай бұрын
Remember don't underestimate Russian military industrial complex and it's capabilities... Look at what happened to Ukraines counter offensive season 2.... It's catastrophically failure 😹😹😹
@danielsnook7362
@danielsnook7362 10 ай бұрын
like how the Russian offensive recently failed when you're the offensive side fighting an entrenched opponent no s*** you can take losses
@ragincajun2446
@ragincajun2446 10 ай бұрын
lets talk about Russia then 3 day special military operation confirmed by RT (Russian Today) as well as Lukashenko (Belarusian dictator) should've been over in 3 days its now day 505+ Russia has confirmed to of lost 11,000 of its armored vehicles compared to Ukraines 3,900 Russia is losing very badly in a war they started yet they complain we send weapons even tho USSR sent weapons to Vietnamese and America didn't give a shit, now u have all these Russians crying like bitches cause they r getting backhanded single handily by Ukraine with NATO weapons that were meant to kill Russians, btw counter attacks such as this 1 haven't started off full they still have 60/75% of NATO weaponry is yet to be used as they r conducting probing attacks trying to find the weakest link which u have no clue how they work look at the ilium offensive or the Kherson offensive the Kherson offensive took back 8,000 sq km of land back from terroist Russia
@dernopenope2005
@dernopenope2005 10 ай бұрын
War is complicated, russian troops are so deeply entranched and they had weeks to prepare. itll be bloody and burtal to get trought the different layers of obstacles, but there is a big fat BUTT russia is not capable to fight back to retake positions (or when only marginaly) because of poor logistics, bad communication, lack of training and moral. Those drones in here are fancy but the numbers will be way to little to make a strategic difference, tactically sure tho. Russia has a lot of projects to hype up support for its armed forces (T14, checkmate, T15, those robot thingis, the cal50 resistant armour etccccc) but its all hype for propaganda. The country has a history of ligitimising its political support via military wins (mostly against low pear adverseries, and even against those they took an insane amount of time and people to be able to claim victory) and those weapons are a small win on the homefront but nothing more.
@DetroitMicroSound
@DetroitMicroSound 10 ай бұрын
How about the Kerch bridge? How about those big explosions in Crimea, very recently?
@FXGreggan.
@FXGreggan. 10 ай бұрын
If you wanna talk about catastrophical failure just look at the russian invasion :)
@oatlord
@oatlord Ай бұрын
Man that thing sure looks like another thing I've seen.
@Matt-yg8ub
@Matt-yg8ub Ай бұрын
The physics are the same regards who produces a stealth airframe… they pretty much all look alike
@zagrepcanin82
@zagrepcanin82 10 ай бұрын
Every radar with 10cm wave lenght can detect stealth or stealthy aircraft. Problem is to pin point it. Thats why mm wave lenght radars have been invented and stealth works in minimising the reflextion of such radars
@stevannikolovski
@stevannikolovski 10 ай бұрын
Yes it was old soviet shortwave radars that saw F-117 in 1999. With reduced reflection, but you cannot have flock of birds flying 700-800Km/h so it was obvious to trained radar operator.
@andreiminin4738
@andreiminin4738 9 ай бұрын
Yes, you have to put 1/4 or better 1/2 of wave length thick coating to consume wave energy. Mm radars were popular on the West while Ussr used sm and ever meter radars. There is also 120 degree reflection, as additional factor, but it doesn't work with long wave radars. keep in mind passive location systems - you must shutdown all radio emitters
@Leader977
@Leader977 9 ай бұрын
Same valid for U.S. F22 and F35.
@dorange_
@dorange_ 2 ай бұрын
the only smart guy in the room
@joulesannadan64
@joulesannadan64 9 ай бұрын
This war should end
@karayuschij
@karayuschij 29 күн бұрын
🤟
@wadopotato33
@wadopotato33 12 күн бұрын
Yeah, but how?
@joshuaalistair3193
@joshuaalistair3193 10 ай бұрын
Interesting idea. So the Okhotnik is intended to deeply penetrate enemy airspace undetected and deliver a payload against its target. It will have the ability to fly in tandem with the Felon who while having stealth like capabilities is not fully stealth. This means that while harder to detect, enemy radar would still be able to detect the SU-57. However, the Su-57 is equipped with the technology to allow it to find and engage both the F-22 and the F-35. So the picture I see is as follows: Russia decides to hit a target, in this case protected by American assets. So they launch their S-70 towards the target. As their S-70 approaches enemy airspace (or just before or sometime after depending on the mission) they launch their SU-57 and send them toward the enemy airspace. If everything works as desired the S-70 delivers its payload undetected, however the payload itself is evident the drone is in the area. As the S-70 makes its way back to Russian air-space, the SU-35 enters enemy airspace where somewhere along the way it meets up with the drone and provides coverage against the F-22 or F-35. Not a bad plan at all... If it works.
@anchorread68
@anchorread68 10 ай бұрын
Opponent might be able to spoof or jam satellite that communicate with a drone, so in my opinion it should always be deployed with SU-57. Peer-to-peer communication between jet will be hard to spoof or jam from the ground.
@majorian4897
@majorian4897 10 ай бұрын
Stealth is largely a meme as soon as ANYONE turns on their radars it's ogre it's like trying to hide a flying broadcasting cell phone tower.
@adityagajjar3118
@adityagajjar3118 10 ай бұрын
It is tandem flight of manned aircraft and loyal wing man . While wingman will enter enemy territory and deliver the payload . Get out of enemy airspace and will join its defender on their way back.
@joshuaalistair3193
@joshuaalistair3193 10 ай бұрын
@@anchorread68 Hmm, we did that with drones and the Longbow back in Afghanistan. At the end of the day if you can spoof or jam a satellite signal, you can do the same with a plane to drone signal.
@joshuaalistair3193
@joshuaalistair3193 10 ай бұрын
@@adityagajjar3118 Yes, I get that. But go back and read what I posted and then think it through a bit. The SU-57 can be picked up by radar, the S-70 cannot. So if the SU-57 escorts the S-70 to the enemy airspace then the SU-57 just alerted the enemy radar to start looking for a S-70... see how the wingman logic doesn't always pan out?
@larryseago730
@larryseago730 14 күн бұрын
IRST systems placed in various locations around the countryside is how to "see" it. That large open nozzle on the back of this Russian drone is a big Heat signature "Howdy". If you will Notice, our drones similar to this, like the RQ 180 and others, we defuse the exhaust and/or hide it from being seen from below, in where we orient it on the A/C. The exhaust will be on top of rear of aircraft, on the most stealthy planes, with any exhaust having a piece or shelf of extended fuselage underneath it hiding it. A ground heat seeking missile system won't get a lock on it that way.
@reginaldlagrone5082
@reginaldlagrone5082 5 ай бұрын
The Horten Ho 229 was the first winged aircraft developed in 1943 Germany
@briann2399
@briann2399 2 ай бұрын
Nie był pierwszym. To bardzo stara koncepcja.
@anonydun82fgoog35
@anonydun82fgoog35 Ай бұрын
Confirming that before 1943 aircraft didn't have wings! I think you meant "flying wing". Pretty much all aircraft have some sort of wing!
@wadopotato33
@wadopotato33 12 күн бұрын
Not at all true. American wasnt first either, but had a flying wing plane called the Avion experimental 1 (Northrop) which flew in 1929. The Horton is the mozt famous...but not first. And anyone who knows about flying wings will also recognize that the American love affair with the design didnt come from Germany as the the B-2 is actually almost exactly the same dimesnions of Northrop's flying wing.
@RealJustLaw
@RealJustLaw 9 ай бұрын
Never underestimate the enemy
@anonydun82fgoog35
@anonydun82fgoog35 Ай бұрын
Unless of course you ARE the "enemy" in which case oh yes please keep underestimating us!
@DollarJonny
@DollarJonny 10 ай бұрын
Ну прям телеканал "Звезда" =)))
@aliceinpearlgarden1
@aliceinpearlgarden1 28 күн бұрын
Radar can't detect but it was spotted ! Mindblowing !
@Paradox7539
@Paradox7539 10 ай бұрын
I stand to be corrected, I believe the Serbs shot down a stealth 117A in the ninety’s by triangulating cell phone towers and detecting a void in the signal and firing. If this is true the technology cannot be that complex to identify an S 70 drone and shoot down a drone.
@joytibloom293
@joytibloom293 10 ай бұрын
Perhaps, but then again, its unmanned, so no loss in manpower and can do whatever manoeuvre that might be hard for a human pilot on board?
@pogo1140
@pogo1140 9 ай бұрын
Nope, the SAM commander said they got lucky. Their long range radar saw something at less than 20 miles but the fire control radar of the SA-2 did not see anything until the F-117 was inside 12 miles. the plane was at around 10-11 miles when the missile reached it. Same radar, only F-35, the SA-2 operator would be able to see the plane with his naked eyes before the guidance radar does.
@somaday2595
@somaday2595 9 ай бұрын
Fluke- F-117's bay doors were open when radar detected it.
@andrewaustin6369
@andrewaustin6369 7 ай бұрын
Yeah the F117 that got shot down was because the pilots routinely flew the same route against procedure and didn't activate all the stealth features and as someone else said the bay doors were open it was a fault of the aircrew not the aircraft.
@pogo1140
@pogo1140 7 ай бұрын
@@andrewaustin6369 also if the EA-6B that normally provided jamming had been on station, the radar would have never seen it at all
@jasondotson6287
@jasondotson6287 9 ай бұрын
They've been in service since 2019 and Russia is expected to have a 4.5% GDP this quarter.
@wadopotato33
@wadopotato33 12 күн бұрын
Russia has a little bump from putting their economy into a wartime footing. Those sorts of bumps are artifical and not sustainable long term. Russia is fucked.
@jasondotson6287
@jasondotson6287 10 күн бұрын
@@wadopotato33 Just the opposite pal. Their economy is kicking...bootlick the MSM all you want dude. Ukraine will be in negotiations with Russia before the end of the year.
@DOGosaurus_rex
@DOGosaurus_rex 10 ай бұрын
that thing looks very similar to the RQ-170, I wonder why?
@lunazero433
@lunazero433 10 ай бұрын
All I see is the horten..
@operamini6
@operamini6 10 ай бұрын
Iran managed to force landing RQ-170 in 2011. Probably reverse engineered by Russian later.
@bl8danjil
@bl8danjil 10 ай бұрын
Stealth designs are pretty generic right now.
@ViceCoin
@ViceCoin 10 ай бұрын
Stealth design is limited.
@anatoleondulet4881
@anatoleondulet4881 10 ай бұрын
Nothing to do with RQ-170, S70 is based on a shovel shape.
@killermed95
@killermed95 Ай бұрын
Geezzz.....it looks so familiar
@dannywaller7679
@dannywaller7679 10 ай бұрын
All 2 of them are sure gonna make a huge difference
@serdgeedgerunner
@serdgeedgerunner 10 ай бұрын
:)
@lubodishlqnov9454
@lubodishlqnov9454 9 ай бұрын
Man the mass production is ready!They just w8 for testing
@gasdorficmuncher9943
@gasdorficmuncher9943 14 күн бұрын
like hitlers Vonderweapons ww2
@Corbin97
@Corbin97 14 күн бұрын
​@lubodishlqnov9454 considering they are drones, I sure hope so. Everyone has drones. Some choose not to show them.
@12313846
@12313846 10 ай бұрын
You say using this ohotnik..... Is an escalation. Only the US let's things escalate..... Slava Russia from Belgium.
@giacomoneri1782
@giacomoneri1782 10 ай бұрын
The bridge in Crimea was considered a terrorist attack on Russian civil infrastructure. Since it happened before, and Russian response was to bomb Ukraine power facilities, my guess is they could respond with a similar reaction, sending out bombers on Kiev side to destroy power plants and ammo warehouses. By the way, it isn't a deliberate escalation, but a reaction to an attack on Russian soil with Russian civilians dead.
@AMERICANPATRIOT1945
@AMERICANPATRIOT1945 10 ай бұрын
You are from Belgium, really? You literally owe your freedom to write comments here on KZbin to US "escalation" that defeated Hitler and his henchmen in WWII and then kept Soviet Russian communists from invading Western European countries including Belgium during the Cold War. It was US "escalation" that defeated the Soviet Russians and saved Eastern Europe from brutal and murderous Soviet Russian occupation. It was the Russians who invaded Ukraine without any provocation whatsoever in 2014 when Russia illegally invaded and annexed Crimea and infiltrated Eastern Ukraine. Think about that fact before you accuse the USA of "escalating" conflict against totalitarian states such as Russia, China, and North Korea.
@regkinsman5429
@regkinsman5429 10 ай бұрын
Correct. Russia was provoked even baited into this proxy war by Joe, Boris Johnson and NATO. The clown,comic or comedian was and is too stupid to see it. Russia is 100%. If this was war from day one it would have been all over on 3 days. Russia/Vladimir Putin did and does not want to demolish Ukraine that is why it's a special operation.... otherwise all tunnels, bridges, railway lines, airports, electricity and water infrastructure would have been history.
@r423sdex
@r423sdex 10 ай бұрын
Crimea belongs to Ukraine. They don't want the bridge.
@coltonjoseph1699
@coltonjoseph1699 10 ай бұрын
Usa is the only tarriost here Slava Russia from 🇨🇦 Canada
@fqeagles21
@fqeagles21 10 ай бұрын
Let's see, it's too early to know it
@firedoorpushkin2341
@firedoorpushkin2341 10 ай бұрын
WHY SHOU;D THERE BE A BALANCE IN A CONFLICT?
@RickyJr46
@RickyJr46 10 ай бұрын
To protect the long-term interests of money laundering.
@SeaJay_Oceans
@SeaJay_Oceans 10 ай бұрын
Genocide takes time, comrade... Russia now conscripting men up to 70 years old... who needs social security programs, when Putin sends all the elderly to fight on the Front lines ?
@markgodin3969
@markgodin3969 10 ай бұрын
One up for Russia, agany US says their technology is useless. They were the first to gointo space , walk in space ,first Satellite, First nuclear power plant. First, nuclear submarines., And on and on.
@yugbe
@yugbe 27 күн бұрын
Russia has no doubt proven they can get to the finish line first a lot of the time, but rarely can they complete the marathon over time. But, this system poses a new kind of threat. Imagine a very large mass production and the utilization of 10 drones per one manned aircraft. This is a big jump for them.
@wadopotato33
@wadopotato33 12 күн бұрын
First Nuclear Sub was the USS Nautilus...you are mistaken there.
@shi_borshi_borshiutka7823
@shi_borshi_borshiutka7823 3 ай бұрын
Его не корпус делает невидимым, а установленная в него система РЭБ...
@aptwo916
@aptwo916 10 ай бұрын
Why does the bomber look like it always has it's landing gear out?
@SlipdeGarcondeJour
@SlipdeGarcondeJour 10 ай бұрын
When you buy your stealth plane from Wish.
@BigSmartArmed
@BigSmartArmed 10 ай бұрын
Russian physicist developed the equation that is used to model RCS, the only "Wish" here is you knowing anything about anything.
@dfloper
@dfloper 10 ай бұрын
When you waste time on youtube instead of doing your homework.
@kudalkarshadab
@kudalkarshadab 9 ай бұрын
​@@dfloper😂😂😂😂😂😂
@kristianpahe4639
@kristianpahe4639 27 күн бұрын
@@BigSmartArmed What is the Russian physicist's name?
@Corbin97
@Corbin97 14 күн бұрын
​@@BigSmartArmedinteresting, using a Scottish physicist work.
@subramani1073
@subramani1073 10 ай бұрын
Very nice combination SU57 and SU70. Great buddy.
@32167BD
@32167BD 10 ай бұрын
planned - one SU and two drones under AI control
@ericdoran24
@ericdoran24 10 ай бұрын
A big thank you to Walter and Reimar Horten .
@timper4326
@timper4326 10 ай бұрын
Don't forget Jack Northrop, his worked.
@markiobook8639
@markiobook8639 10 ай бұрын
You bet
@wadopotato33
@wadopotato33 12 күн бұрын
Only if you believe that Germans were the only ones working on flying wings designs. The stealth bombers the US made come from Northrop work on the flying wing and that work predates the Hortens. Avion Experimental #1 flew in 1929 and happens to be the same company that made the B-2. If fact, the B-2 was the same rough dimensions as the Northrop flying wings.
@ronchabale
@ronchabale 10 ай бұрын
Not likely to see them ever (I mean with all the stealth and shit) Guess the T14 Armata also is super stealth cos we havn´t seen them either as of yet
@scrubvision5652
@scrubvision5652 10 ай бұрын
repeat the same thing over and over again you sheep cant come up with something new ? all energy wasted in picking up dresses as a man ?
@benchapman2210
@benchapman2210 10 ай бұрын
Imagine a prototype has already seen action than F22 which is good at shooting baloons😂
@scrubvision5652
@scrubvision5652 10 ай бұрын
@@benchapman2210 if f22 enters combact i bet it will be the biggest fraud in the history of military just like f117
@Reflect02
@Reflect02 10 ай бұрын
T-90M are killing ur leopard boy right now, cri cri
@Reflect02
@Reflect02 10 ай бұрын
​@@benchapman2210even second time lmao... For a fcking balloon
@daytonlebar8224
@daytonlebar8224 13 күн бұрын
Just remember those fighter jets are only as good as the pilot in the seat!
@quayshawndameron1349
@quayshawndameron1349 10 ай бұрын
Spotting a stealth plane isn't a big deal completing the kill chain is. Detect, track and kill.
@snacks1184
@snacks1184 10 ай бұрын
I am sure it will work as well as the T-14 tank.
@scrubvision5652
@scrubvision5652 10 ай бұрын
it will work better then destroyed bradleys and leopard 2
@militaryfall5147
@militaryfall5147 10 ай бұрын
The T-14 is used to repel counterattacks at Kremennaya. Engine problems have been fixed for a long time.
@thewedge8823
@thewedge8823 10 ай бұрын
no need to even deploy the T-14..... T-90m is killing it now.
@ibitefingers3380
@ibitefingers3380 10 ай бұрын
​@@scrubvision5652What about the thousands of destroyed Russian tanks before the Bradley's and.leopards got to Ukraine? Or does thag not count since it doesn't fit your propaganda
@scrubvision5652
@scrubvision5652 10 ай бұрын
@@ibitefingers3380 it doesnt matter how many tanks get destroyed mate russians lost like 83 thousand tanks in ww2 what matters is who will win and so far russians look in better shape regardless of what your bs media is pushing war of attrition russians have more shells more manpower and more tanks and other equipment
@arronhopsburg8532
@arronhopsburg8532 2 ай бұрын
What delicate balance?!?! Russia is kicking butt.
@whatfreedom7
@whatfreedom7 19 күн бұрын
They have really only made small ground in over 2 years against a poorly equipped military. They aren’t kicking butt at all but they aren’t loosing either. It’s honestly more of a stalemate lately.
@volatilecolon
@volatilecolon 18 күн бұрын
What war have you been watching?
@Corbin97
@Corbin97 14 күн бұрын
I learned today, that the definition of kicking butt is, barely being able to occupy half a country that borders you, and is a 30th of your size.
@wadopotato33
@wadopotato33 12 күн бұрын
They occupy 20% of a cou try they tried to invade 3 years ago...where's the ass kicking? Dumb.
@RaviKumar-lq1vx
@RaviKumar-lq1vx 10 ай бұрын
I like the sound you use in your vidios. The tone is fantastic ❤❤❤
@martinsaunders2942
@martinsaunders2942 10 ай бұрын
It’s an interesting looking drone…but it’s thermal signature will be massive with that nozzle at the back..
@dailyindopak
@dailyindopak 10 ай бұрын
Russia is testing a flat nozzle engine for su57,the same can be used for s70
@christianschellbruck9788
@christianschellbruck9788 4 ай бұрын
if thats a big problem, than every stealth fighter in the world would have the same problem. So i guess its not such a big deal if you are not directly behind the aircraft. Or how could the Amercian F22 or F35 even work?
@volatilecolon
@volatilecolon 18 күн бұрын
@@christianschellbruck9788 F-22 has a reduced IR signature due to its clamshell nozzle design.
@zarasun8070
@zarasun8070 10 ай бұрын
gratitude to the collective West for giving impetus to the development of Russian military technologies.
@Corbin97
@Corbin97 14 күн бұрын
Still subpar.
@gino3286
@gino3286 Ай бұрын
this is the future clearly I would think also to a stealth drone interceptor But stealth is more important than everything really
@Michael-ek2eb
@Michael-ek2eb Ай бұрын
Even if it were true, we don’t send our latest and greatest over there. We have the tech for sure, we just aren’t sharing it.
@i-love-space390
@i-love-space390 10 ай бұрын
It was inevitable that with the Russian military budget being smaller than the West, they would have to resort to robotic Stealth aircraft rather than manned. The questions are how many can they make, and how vulnerable will they be to interference? Interesting that the footage of the aircraft in flight shows conventional engine exhausts, not the slotted ones of the drawings. Will it have a more advanced version later, or was that just a mistake?
@coshyno
@coshyno 10 ай бұрын
It might be smaller but the US with its massive budget has a lot of corruption. People think Russia is corrupt but imagine the US, being a democracy does not mean that it is not a corrupt country. Russia, when ever it invests money on new weapons system, tends to get the same result for a lot less money. More money does not mean better, not always.
@Neoblades
@Neoblades 10 ай бұрын
From what I read in the Russian forums of military affairs this is the first prototype, they are using and testing it and if it is shot down the problem will not be so great
@user-xk9jw6gh2j
@user-xk9jw6gh2j 9 ай бұрын
​​@@coshynoв США нет ни демократии ни свободы слова а в России есть демократия и свобода слова смотри Такер Карлсона
@MrKasugano
@MrKasugano 9 ай бұрын
@@coshyno Oh brother, the corruption issue has in any country in any industry, it depends solely on the personal traits to serve your country and your countrymen. No ideal country exist on that topic. Wasted US military budget is that only because USA prints $ itself so they can invest more, be it in Euro currency the outcome would be different.
@andreiminin4738
@andreiminin4738 9 ай бұрын
There is flight simulator from M$ inside - no need to reinvent wheel - added arduino, joystick, wifi router and it is working! Forgot couple chips from loundry machine (coffee maker will work too)...
@Thomash613a
@Thomash613a 10 ай бұрын
There are only two S-70 Okhotnik Stealth Bomber Drones in existence.....
@tu1469
@tu1469 9 ай бұрын
And neither of them have been detected to shoot down what more can one ask for😂
@crazygamingyt7245
@crazygamingyt7245 2 ай бұрын
@@tu1469yeah they are gonna start mass producing them in 2024 buddy….
@aardvarkbiscuit2677
@aardvarkbiscuit2677 2 ай бұрын
and Russia has only two missiles left in their arsenal.
@gasdorficmuncher9943
@gasdorficmuncher9943 14 күн бұрын
funny how it gets used during victory day month then they will put it away like the t14 tanks
@Corbin97
@Corbin97 14 күн бұрын
​@@crazygamingyt7245it's 2024, so where is the mass production? Sure hope yall can keep it a secret like the U.S does. Not great to unviel a "drone" and not have more than 2.
@majorian4897
@majorian4897 10 ай бұрын
Vertigo bomber, standing by!
@farooqkhan8383
@farooqkhan8383 Ай бұрын
Russia should use what he have the best,US n Europe always manipulate situation nd under estimate the other countries.even US n Europe promised Russia not expanding toward eastern europe but time by time now NATO expansion reached at Russian borders nd now Ukrain going to be use in hand of America.
@Corbin97
@Corbin97 14 күн бұрын
Sorry, we cannot help that countries want to join NATO. We will not bow to any country that dictates they can't either.
@renedecima6644
@renedecima6644 10 ай бұрын
Wow impresionante bravo Rusia 🇷🇺💪🇦🇷
@emmanuelubaha5815
@emmanuelubaha5815 Ай бұрын
Russia doesn't need too many of these drones. All they need is to protect the numbers they produce from being downed. Since they are undetectable by western radars , they are likely to survive every combat missions.
@troydamrill9094
@troydamrill9094 Ай бұрын
America invented and continues to perfect stealth systems do not underestimate their ability to detect, lock onto, engage and destroy lesser as well as more advanced stealth technologies.
@Desire123ification
@Desire123ification 10 ай бұрын
A game changer: 16 mini R-77 AAM (similar to CUDA/Peregrine) or 2 Kh-50/ Kab 1500 etc.
@paulgarner8914
@paulgarner8914 10 ай бұрын
I am no expert on stealth but this craft has a lot of things sticking out on the top and front that would not help with keeping the radar signature low. Also the engine sticking out of the back as far as it does can`t be good for a low heat signature.
@Brutus-hv5ql
@Brutus-hv5ql 10 ай бұрын
Funny how that stealthy graphic design doesn’t match that actual, real world structure. We can see it.
@maksimluzin1121
@maksimluzin1121 10 ай бұрын
Do you see a difference between a Su-57 'test prototype' and 'serial production' one?
@maksimluzin1121
@maksimluzin1121 10 ай бұрын
A lot of sensors on a test prototype, just to collect the info as much as possible, from all directions, so a lot of 'antennas'... The serial ones will be 'slim' and 'flat'...😊
@tankconquerer5428
@tankconquerer5428 10 ай бұрын
Its specifically designed to protect itself from ground air deffence missiles probably.
@maksimluzin1121
@maksimluzin1121 10 ай бұрын
@@tankconquerer5428 , it is a 'test prototype', not a serial/production one. It Must to have a lot of antennas, sensors, intakes, etc to Collect all the data how it's working! Like a bug, full of the antennas/sensors/acceptors everywhere on its body... The 'environmental awareness', just to collect what is it around you and 'who are you' in the 'environment'... Nothing more.
@whatwewantAItodo
@whatwewantAItodo 14 күн бұрын
It blows my mind that it weighs 25 tons!
@joeyfrakes5455
@joeyfrakes5455 10 ай бұрын
If their still just barely gettin out of testing how many of these could be actually operating?
@VLADDD-THE-SANCTIONS-IMPALER
@VLADDD-THE-SANCTIONS-IMPALER 10 ай бұрын
I love this channel than watching milley speeches
@roshanwadasinghe7294
@roshanwadasinghe7294 10 ай бұрын
Nato troll detected
@nasha5292
@nasha5292 10 ай бұрын
Western weapons in Ukraine from Leo2 ,himars to stormshadows overall was proven to be ineffective so far against Russian defense hence the failure of the counter offensive by Ukraine, western tech has been captured and their flaws and advantage will surely be scrutinized by Russian experts.
@fgm1197
@fgm1197 10 ай бұрын
Every weapon system has flaws don't be so negative. The counter offensive didn't fail it is just going slower than desired. And btw. do you know the kill/death ration of a Leo2(for example) against Russian tanks? .... What do you expect? Do you expect 16 Leo2A6 tanks to win this war? Don't be so negative. patience!
@nasha5292
@nasha5292 10 ай бұрын
@@fgm1197 just like the leo2 they considered it as the best tank in the world even the abrams lost to it, underestimating the enemy is the keyword, Germany during ww2 did thesame calling russians as subhumans, that is why Germany was crushed and their soldiers were paraded in the streets of moscow.
@damonburroughs5283
@damonburroughs5283 10 ай бұрын
Well the strikes on russian bases today say otherwise don't they lol
@babycannis9667
@babycannis9667 10 ай бұрын
Put your money where your mouth is . Russian air defences can barely take down HIMARS rockets much less storm shadow . Why do you think so many Russians military bases are bring BBQ’d ? Stop chatting garbage and remember propaganda does not win on the battlefield. Glory to Ukraine 🇺🇦
@fgm1197
@fgm1197 10 ай бұрын
@nasha5292 Lol no matter how strong their orc army is they are subhumans. They rape, murder and loot. They haven't evolved a bit the last 80 years.
@chuckbronco6485
@chuckbronco6485 8 күн бұрын
That engine nozzle screams infrared signature.
@ludeman
@ludeman Ай бұрын
The wing man drones are a game changer. The US is doing this as well
@stevenkerry3101
@stevenkerry3101 10 ай бұрын
funny how it looks very similar to US stealth bomber in shape .
@anatoleondulet4881
@anatoleondulet4881 10 ай бұрын
Wrong ! it's based on shovel shape.
@dannysema6786
@dannysema6786 10 ай бұрын
But not funny why this works so well.
@anchorread68
@anchorread68 10 ай бұрын
same shape since WW2, Horten Ho 229 prototype, year 1944. The shape follows some physical law, cannot change, only the internal component can be changed.
@user-lz8qo2ie7s
@user-lz8qo2ie7s 9 ай бұрын
Physics is the same for everyone
@abderahmandj3845_muslim
@abderahmandj3845_muslim 8 ай бұрын
So the american looks like the nazi one
@sumerbc7409
@sumerbc7409 10 ай бұрын
Never mind it has a giant Naked Exposed Jet nozzle Flame Thrower sticking out the rear that glows WHITE HOT on infra-Red.. Just take our word for it, it is stealth lol
@avengerpz
@avengerpz 10 ай бұрын
And? How close you have to be to see it? In altitude of 5 kms you cant even see the plane, but you think you will see the flame, yeah right. You barely can see it on video that was shoot some dozen meters away from it, but you gonna see it from 5km or more, good joke, By the way ... did you watched the video on infra red so you know? 😁
@Trebor74
@Trebor74 10 ай бұрын
​@@avengerpzcan't be that stealthy if they've got a photo of it and it's been seen.
@sumerbc7409
@sumerbc7409 10 ай бұрын
@@avengerpz They don't use 'eyeballs' to lock onto enemy aircraft with weapons you idiot. Hi technology anti air systems can see it's radar and HEAT signature just fine. silly
@ali-haider5788
@ali-haider5788 10 ай бұрын
The new su57 they changed the engine to a new stealthy kme
@sumerbc7409
@sumerbc7409 10 ай бұрын
@@ali-haider5788 Or so you Hope haha lol.
@jamiegunter7016
@jamiegunter7016 10 ай бұрын
10 su 57 , two of those drones, 6 t14 armata tanks , none of these weapons systems will get close to the front in Ukraine
@scrubvision5652
@scrubvision5652 10 ай бұрын
listen emasculated sheep they dont need to use su 57 they have su 35 and 2u 24 which are doing the job fine and t-14 is not ready and they dont need it right now t90 ms and upgraded older t series tank are more cost effiective and are doing the job perfectly
@Matt-yg8ub
@Matt-yg8ub Ай бұрын
Depends, the front keeps moving west.
@aldenunion
@aldenunion 7 ай бұрын
Are only so many designs for aerodynamic lift,just as musical notes and they belong to everyone and nobody invented them but god putting them here.
@filhofreire7100
@filhofreire7100 10 ай бұрын
Diante dos meios aéreos utilizados, esta pode ser chamada a guerra dos drones. Com a preparação dos robôs de combate, eles podem operar simultâneo com os drones de reconhecimento e ataque ao solo.
@fatgirlboy9341
@fatgirlboy9341 10 ай бұрын
US sent the switchblade drones to Ukraine in the beginning of the war. Russia took the idea and mastering this idea carving holes in the ukraine counteroffensive
@_Coffee4Closers
@_Coffee4Closers 9 ай бұрын
LOL... You mean they bought some from 3rd World Iran.
@cedhot
@cedhot 19 күн бұрын
b21 raider will come and say hold my beer
@gasdorficmuncher9943
@gasdorficmuncher9943 14 күн бұрын
oh yes , i bet skunk works is working on drone killers
@genetixx01
@genetixx01 10 ай бұрын
Ahh, I love this channel, it's full of nuance and objectivity, it reminds me RT news...
@HDCowboy
@HDCowboy 10 ай бұрын
If my memory serves me correctly, back during the Iraq conflict we had smart bombs that would attack radar installations, seems we could develop a system that would target their jamming systems just just the same in my opinion.
@DODSexualMisconductOffic-ko6ws
@DODSexualMisconductOffic-ko6ws 10 ай бұрын
It be great if the other party strengthen their technically accum nd upgrade the current system to be more lethal make it sure that you keep on spending substantial amount on toys as the U.S can't stand competition.
@AugustSchroif
@AugustSchroif 10 ай бұрын
It's safe to assume those bombs were smarter than people writing comments on youtube nowadays,.
@thatonedude2228
@thatonedude2228 9 ай бұрын
Antiradar missiles from SEAD aircraft, they target the radiowaves
@pogo1140
@pogo1140 9 ай бұрын
It's called home on jam, missiles as far back as the Phoenix missile had them, so does the AIM-120 and all of the US Anti-radiation missiles
@Matt-yg8ub
@Matt-yg8ub Ай бұрын
Just about everybody already has that
@duykhangnguyen7437
@duykhangnguyen7437 10 ай бұрын
No1
@yostaustin
@yostaustin Ай бұрын
How many of these are there ? Oh yeah not very many ! Actually an obscenely small amount. It's an important device but not at scale.
@Sandhill1988
@Sandhill1988 Ай бұрын
It's no coincidence that it looks like the RQ drone that Iran Somehow got a hold of a few years ago.
@Upuauta
@Upuauta 10 ай бұрын
That exhaust is definately not stealthy...
@eeJOKERee
@eeJOKERee 10 ай бұрын
dude the enemy will be using radar not binoculars lmao🤣
@theprotagonist8755
@theprotagonist8755 10 ай бұрын
​@@eeJOKEReeyet here you are beating off to it
@ThisIsMyRealName
@ThisIsMyRealName 10 ай бұрын
@@eeJOKERee dude just the heat signature itself will give it away ...lmfao
@umu8934
@umu8934 10 ай бұрын
​@@ThisIsMyRealNameit's already said in the video they only spotted it after it bomb a district in Sumy region... So if the Ukrainian using a air defense radar why they didn't shoot it down immediately 😹😹😹 Sometimes you need to use simple logic and common sense bruh😸🙃🤪
@DetroitMicroSound
@DetroitMicroSound 10 ай бұрын
@@eeJOKERee many weapons systems can track heat signatures, too.
@ckabo1980maestro
@ckabo1980maestro 10 ай бұрын
B2b was wisible on radar and one was shoted down B2b ( Spirit of Missury) 1999.on NATO agresion on Serbia by Serbian Anty Air Defense with S-125 NEVA, same batery who shoted down F-117 A , this batery of Serbian AAD was shoted down and F-16 C ,plain wich pilot was be David Golfride, now US four star General and chef of staf of U.S.A.F ! Only white nation and only Europin country who defited NATO was Serbia ! No one can shoted down S-70 Ohotnik or Rusian Suhoy and Mikoyan Gurevic airplanes !
@pogo1140
@pogo1140 9 ай бұрын
No B-2 have ever been shot down. 1 crashed on takeoff, 2 are undergoing repairs due to damage on landing
@pluffer96
@pluffer96 9 ай бұрын
In your dreams, low life!
@Corbin97
@Corbin97 14 күн бұрын
Think you mean the f-117, which is not in service anymore. Considering Russias drone has only been shown once, and they have less than 5, I'd imagine they are not going to put into the position where it can get shot down. Sorry to say both of your examples have been shot down, though for the third one, I'm not sure what model you are talking about.
@izzarchron
@izzarchron 10 ай бұрын
Real test on the Battlefield!
@CarlChaitanya
@CarlChaitanya Ай бұрын
You say this may be a changing factor in the delicate balance 😂 There is no delicate balance Russia is in total control over the battle.
@gregoriodadulla7785
@gregoriodadulla7785 10 ай бұрын
If it is visible to the eyes it can be shut down by portable anti-tank weapons.
@linux9846
@linux9846 10 ай бұрын
ok, Mr Rambo
@malcolmt7883
@malcolmt7883 10 ай бұрын
@@linux9846 You can also hit it with a hammer if it's on the ground
@linux9846
@linux9846 10 ай бұрын
@@malcolmt7883 Yes, General, Sir General Rambo
@maxmustermann19203
@maxmustermann19203 10 ай бұрын
thats like using a 22lr on a anti air canon
@RealJustLaw
@RealJustLaw 9 ай бұрын
A few shots from a Pistol should drop it outta the sky 🤡
@bangladefencenews4142
@bangladefencenews4142 10 ай бұрын
Make sure that all information is true. I am your sbscriber.
@jamesshamburger5435
@jamesshamburger5435 13 күн бұрын
If western radar can’t see it how was it spotted by the naked eye!
@sumerbc7409
@sumerbc7409 10 ай бұрын
If it's so stealth then fly it all the time over Ukr air defense systems.. see what happens.
@RealCS2000
@RealCS2000 10 ай бұрын
Western radars can't detect but this random youtube channel can? Seems pretty legit.
@calebpalmer9317
@calebpalmer9317 10 ай бұрын
Doesn't look like a stealth shovel to me
@edash3397
@edash3397 9 сағат бұрын
Where is this mystical game changing drone now? 05/20/2024
@voyteck7696
@voyteck7696 10 ай бұрын
on paper and in their imagination, yes
@rudicantfail2
@rudicantfail2 10 ай бұрын
Yes, I immediately thought "Horten Bomber". The russians must have captured a Horten Ho-229 prototype, and kept it secret. They rarely come up with unique designs, they just copy other designs, mainly from the West.
@maksimluzin1121
@maksimluzin1121 10 ай бұрын
​@@The_Funguseater, The 'flying wing' design is known for Everyone for 70 years, at least...
@pavel3596
@pavel3596 Ай бұрын
Yes, they were even the first in the space thanks to stolen Western designs. Are you all right above your neck?
@rmcgraw7943
@rmcgraw7943 Ай бұрын
I wonder where they came up with such an innovative shape and technology? 😂😂😂
@markus30370
@markus30370 Ай бұрын
Imagine a nuclear payload, emp first strike, blinding your opponent
@johnlindauer
@johnlindauer 10 ай бұрын
And yet they detected it. Stealth features does not mean stealth. shrug.
@johnmoriarty6158
@johnmoriarty6158 10 ай бұрын
Stealth to avoid targeting.
@johnlindauer
@johnlindauer 10 ай бұрын
@@johnmoriarty6158 and yet the drone has not demonstrated that it has any actual stealth capability... the su-57 was touted as 5th gen - but it's stealth is so poorly delivered - and the heat-signature from its exposed thrust vectoring nozzle makes it too easy to detect to the point that it is now classified as 4th-plus generation. And this drone has the same exposed engine... the russian's are good at advertising but poor at delivery.
@georgepantazis141
@georgepantazis141 10 ай бұрын
That engine has a heat signature I can feel from Australia 🇦🇺 have a look at our loyal wingman it's the real Deal.👍🇦🇺🌍🇺🇦🇧🇧🙉🙈🙊🏴‍☠️
@johnlindauer
@johnlindauer 10 ай бұрын
@@georgepantazis141 100%
@calistusfrancis1340
@calistusfrancis1340 10 ай бұрын
Bro smoking DC propaganda 😂
@boo3553
@boo3553 9 ай бұрын
Give Ukraine to Russia. End the war.
@j.k.ravshanovich
@j.k.ravshanovich 2 ай бұрын
Ukraine is no one's to be given away. They made the decision to fight against Russia over diplomacy. Now let them pay the price. Russia doesn't intend to end the war soon. Russia wants to drain NATO money into waste so that they learn a lesson Russia can't be bullied.
@aleksandr_pz
@aleksandr_pz 21 күн бұрын
Россия не требует отдать Украину. Россия требует сменить режим, нацистскую идеологию и сделать Украину нейтральным государством. И обеспечить права русского населения Украины.
@Wonderwhoopin
@Wonderwhoopin 10 ай бұрын
They can’t mass produce drones😂 how are they even gonna do this? Hell their electric vehicles even suck
@realrusskij1
@realrusskij1 10 ай бұрын
Fellow Americans you know what your problems is you just thinking always about yourself super bupper. Look in US inside open border, infrastructure looks like shit all country crumble in pieces and you bold enough judge Russia. Great Theater in Moscow much much older that your freaking entire country
@scrubvision5652
@scrubvision5652 10 ай бұрын
you lost in afghanistan to goat herders 🤣🤣🤣🤣and ran
@yugbe
@yugbe 27 күн бұрын
While we have seen the single wingman in these videos, I wonder just how many could be controlled by a single wingman setup with a 57 running lead. With an AI engine, its power could be immense and creates a new series of battle tactics unseen before.
@Shuhua1999
@Shuhua1999 10 ай бұрын
If it was spotted over Ukraine then it can be detected!😆😆
@manishchaudhari8827
@manishchaudhari8827 10 ай бұрын
Radar couldn't detect it idiot
@axl87
@axl87 10 ай бұрын
It's the first thing I told myself.. but I'm no military specialist 😁
@sumerbc7409
@sumerbc7409 10 ай бұрын
@@manishchaudhari8827 With a typically crude Russian plain ole jet exhaust nozzle sticking out the back it would be easy to shoot down. It's not really stealth . American drones have concealed exhaust, because they are REAL stealth silly. haha
@Shuhua1999
@Shuhua1999 10 ай бұрын
@@axl87 dude I call shenanigan's!!!😆😆😆😆
@avengerpz
@avengerpz 10 ай бұрын
It was detected after stuff blown up, isnt it?
@jarednovel
@jarednovel 10 ай бұрын
The Russians reverse engineered the US stealth drone RQ-170 Sentinel that was captured by Iran in 2011.. Iran also has similar drone
@lunazero433
@lunazero433 10 ай бұрын
All I see is the horten..
@danielsnook7362
@danielsnook7362 10 ай бұрын
@@lunazero433 yet the horten was a piece of s*** the b2 spirit was way better
@sparkzbarca
@sparkzbarca 16 күн бұрын
i like how the renderings all show a blended engine cowling and the actual thing is just "heres my giant engine!" Then you have all the vertical surfaces you can see at 8:25 with the antennas and sensor balls not just on top but also on bottom. You have to hope that's just a prototype with excess equipment to gather data because the whole purpose of the blended wing is to avoid vertical surfaces. That thing is bouncing returns off the vertical surfaces and then the engine of course is an unmitigated disaster in stealth. The engine has thrust vectoring which is nice I suppose but having the mechanisms exposed means it will again bounce radar returns like mad. They thought they could make something stealthy, then they realized that engine needs too much air coming in so they put too large an opening at the front to take in air, giving it a frontal radar return. then they realized they couldn't actually dissipate the heat from the engine without exposing it to open air and so they removed the cowlings designed to shield the engine from radar giving it a rear radar return as well as a massive thermal return that any fifth gen fighter jet could pick up with it's IRST system from miles and miles away. Then they realized they couldn't actually give the thing it's own its ability to use a radar and radio comms and see things unless they took the sensors and raised them up and away from the radar and radio absorbing body creating large vertical protrusions thats give it a radar return from any side on view. Great job Russia, you've made a stealth drone that could hardly be more visible if you strapped a rocket to a school bus.
@userx76y
@userx76y 9 ай бұрын
nice prototype..some people afraid of ghost even there was no ghost place
@coshyno
@coshyno 10 ай бұрын
Beautiful piece of equipment ! The Americans have nothing like it ! This is testament to Russia's superior technological capability.
@Stephen-bq4nq
@Stephen-bq4nq 10 ай бұрын
Dream on😂
@volatilecolon
@volatilecolon 18 күн бұрын
Lmfao. Sure thing Chat-GPT.
@Hanimichal
@Hanimichal 10 ай бұрын
just testing in real combat in guaranteed domination zone 🇷🇺👏👏👏
@captjinxmarine9832
@captjinxmarine9832 10 ай бұрын
This sounds like a Russian channel, the 57 is more detectable than Frances latest 4++
Why is the Su-35 Tough for Patriot Missiles to Hit
9:00
Military TV
Рет қаралды 305 М.
ОДИН ДОМА #shorts
00:34
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 6 МЛН
Can You Draw The PERFECT Circle?
00:57
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 75 МЛН
У мамы в машине все найдется
00:38
Даша Боровик
Рет қаралды 3,1 МЛН
Como ela fez isso? 😲
00:12
Los Wagners
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
Why Lancet Drones Highly Effective in Ukraine?
9:08
Military TV
Рет қаралды 755 М.
Did Russia build the best attack helicopter ever?
19:02
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 792 М.
How Much Firepower Does Russia Have Left After Two Years of War?
9:00
How Russia built a stealth jet to beat the west - Su-57
21:53
Found And Explained
Рет қаралды 612 М.
What Makes Russia's Lancet Kamikaze Drone so Deadly
8:01
Military TV
Рет қаралды 482 М.
Flying low and fast over Ukraine in an aging Mig-29
5:03
Washington Post
Рет қаралды 698 М.
Купите ЭТОТ БЮДЖЕТНИК вместо флагманов от Samsung, Xiaomi и Apple!
13:03
Thebox - о технике и гаджетах
Рет қаралды 82 М.
Я Создал Новый Айфон!
0:59
FLV
Рет қаралды 3,6 МЛН
Nokia 3310 versus Red Hot Ball
0:37
PressTube
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
How Neuralink Works 🧠
0:28
Zack D. Films
Рет қаралды 30 МЛН
Samsung vs Apple Vision Pro🤯
0:31
FilmBytes
Рет қаралды 963 М.
Introducing the all-new iPad Pro | Apple
1:29
Apple
Рет қаралды 37 МЛН