Sigma's STATE OF THE "ART" Lens. 😉 "Like" if you laughed. "Comment" if you thought it was dumb. 😂 Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 for Sony: geni.us/3ye8IC (B&H) Peak Design Everyday V2 Info: geni.us/rkVxe 00:00 Price! 00:50 What is 24-70mm Good for? 01:19 Low Light Performance 02:09 Image Quality 02:42 Bokeh 04:54 AutoFocus Performance 07:13 Close Focusing Capability 07:52 For VLOGGING 08:27 It's HEAVY 09:46 Weather Sealing 10:49 VS Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 11:13 Would I Recommend Sigma 24-70mm?
@janzeddrieck58014 жыл бұрын
Could do stand up, fosho. 😂
@SemiRetiredBob4 жыл бұрын
I laughed because it was so dumb 😀 It doesn't make you any less my 'go to' review person. Keep up the good work
@lukazupie72204 жыл бұрын
Sorry bro..:)
@OptimaMrL4 жыл бұрын
Hey, potato jet!! Ha ha. Love your stuff man
@JeseeWalker4 жыл бұрын
Can you test the video autofocus of this lens compared to the Tamron 28-75? That will dictate my decision, thanks!!
@Photomeike4 жыл бұрын
Yo Jason Vong really do be out here doing the best reviews. Top 5 dead or alive.
@TR3NDSTTRS4 жыл бұрын
Honestly you deserve so many more subscribers. The content that you post is always informative and I learn so much from you! Continue making this fantastic content! You have a knack for it!
@JasonVong4 жыл бұрын
appreciate you always coming back and watch! :)
@morrieglick41374 жыл бұрын
I agree with TR3NDTTRS
@doniscoming7 ай бұрын
He does though right? On his main channel - Potato Jet 🤣
@yedmail4 жыл бұрын
Oh my god, thank you for this one. I've been stuck back and forth between the Tamron 28-75 and the Sony 24-105, and this lens solves my problems with both.
@reddawn874 жыл бұрын
Exactly my situation! So glad i held out for this one. It really is a little heavy though, haven't gotten round to using it for events or travelling proper yet.
@BarryJohns3 жыл бұрын
I just got this lens yesterday, I’m freaking blown away.
@elisamuelcuadrado21443 жыл бұрын
I wanted the Tamron since it came out and now that I finally decided to upgrade I’m going to get this one. I don’t mind the weight if it has a better build quality and it looks better. Once again you can’t go wrong with Jason Vong 👍🏻
@bb1kehn4 жыл бұрын
waiting for that new 70-200mm from Sigma and this 24-70mm, I might add this to my arsenal too!
@brendantaylor26234 жыл бұрын
Why not the 70-200 GM?
@bobleetech4 жыл бұрын
@@brendantaylor2623 Because it's expensive, has onion rings, and not particularly sharp @ 70mm? Sony associates GM with sharpness and bokeh, and at $2600 they better deliver them. Would also like to see if the Sigma is more lightweight than the GM.
@ItzSlushie11 ай бұрын
Jason I know this video is old, but I come to all your reviews before I decide on my purchases. And you’ve never let me down yet. I plan on getting this lens for my a7iv and I am so excited to finally get a zoom lens over my sigma 35 1.4
@parmanduke3 жыл бұрын
This was one of the most impressive lenses I've used. Its near sharp as primes.
@6gwilliams4 жыл бұрын
It is actually lighter than the Sony 24-70mm f2.8 GM lens.
@KainSwiss4 жыл бұрын
Agreed, the Sigma out does the Sony lens on price, and outshines the Tamron on build quality and performance
@ShaneIrwin73 жыл бұрын
That’s good to know. I just bought the Sigma today. Loving it so far.
@blueghost80573 жыл бұрын
@@ShaneIrwin7 you still loving it now? I wanna buy it too 😅
@ShaneIrwin73 жыл бұрын
@@blueghost8057 yes I’ve used it on 3 photo session already. Very reliable and great quality. Could not be happier. The price is very right too.
@padiver Жыл бұрын
It was true at the time of your comment. But now Sony new lens is lighter.
@jamesgkrk4 жыл бұрын
Thanks Jason, in original video when you bought it in Tokyo, you said two things. 1) that you would sell this lens after the review & 2) that you had 24-70 2.8 gm and you'd never get rid of that. Hence my question. I get that Sigma is best value for money, but if money was no object which would you recommend?
@NickL0VIN4 жыл бұрын
I also thought it was too heavy for casual use so I then rented the tamron 28-75mm. Tamron was great and light but then I realized I shot half of my images at 24mm when I rented the Sigma. So I had to go with the 16-55mm F2.8 on APSC. That’s a 24-83mm équivalent and super light! Yes, it’s APSC but sometimes for travel the combination of weight and focal length matters the most! Thanks again for a funny video!
@warcraftkid144 жыл бұрын
Great Video Jason! Stumbled across your page a few days ago and after watching some of your stuff it made me want to get back into Photography for the first time since 2013 so i purchased this lens and a Sony A7iii based on your review videos. Look forward to learning more from your page!
@dlovisuals4 жыл бұрын
Love the new format Jason! CES looked like it was blast! Also my response to the bokeh article: bokeh is bokeh. Lol
@anulearntech4 жыл бұрын
I bought the A7III with the Tamron 17-28. I wouldn't mind this sigma over the Tamron 28+75 except for the weight. I think Tamron makes more sense for me now. It's quite light and complements the Sony bodies more.
@JustinDoesTriathlon4 жыл бұрын
I'm using an A7iii with 17-28; I bought and returned the 28-75. Here's why: I love small and light, a lot, so I completely agree with you. I've used (but not owned) the 24-70GM, and it really is quite a brick. The 17-28 is awesome because it doesn't feel like it has many compromises over the 16-35, is super small, and just a fun little lens. Here's what I didn't like about the 28-75. 24 vs 28 is noticeable; it just is. It really does have this feel of making you wish you could zoom out just a bit further. Next, the MF focus ring, at least on my copy, was truly awful. It felt like it had zero resistance. To be clear, I don't even mind focus by wire, I just hated THAT one. Lastly, the bokeh just isn't that attractive. When comparing the 28-75 vs the GM, the Tamron wins just because the price of the GM is so massively high. Now that this is in the picture? I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of the recommendations for the Tamron start moving this way. If absolute small and light is your #1, then yeah, still Tamron, but the Sigma has a lot of big wins too.
@elliotw.8884 жыл бұрын
@@JustinDoesTriathlon would you pair your sigma 24-70 with the tamron 17-28? or would you opt for the sigma 14-24 instead?
@JustinDoesTriathlon4 жыл бұрын
@@elliotw.888 Tamron for me. I love that it's so small and light. It comes down to how you shoot and what you need, but I don't care about 14 vs 17, but I do care about small and light. 14 is *really wide.* If you want that look, well there you go, but 17 is damn wide too. When the 17-28 is on, I'm super small and light, it's weather sealed, and I'm just pretty content. The 14-28 looks nice, but I'm not interested in more or less double the price to get 14-17; it's just not a need I have. Tamron is literally half the weight. 17-28 + Sigma 24-70 is a hell of a 'budget' combo.
@alexchiem11754 жыл бұрын
@@JustinDoesTriathlon would you think of picking up the sigma 24-70 in the future?
@JustinDoesTriathlon4 жыл бұрын
@@alexchiem1175 I got one last week! :D Haven't rolled it through its paces yet, and I'm no expert, but I love it so far. Just ticks the right boxes for me. No MASSIVE $$$ of the GM, fixes all the things that annoyed me about the 28-75 for just a little more. I still love my 17-28, but the Sigma 24-70 is just so much better than the 28-75 for me. It's bigger and heavier, though.
@stefpix4 жыл бұрын
This is a great option, with weather sealing and short focus distance. I bought the Sony 16-55, for APSC, it costs 200 more, no weather sealing, not great minimum focus distance (although the same IQ as Sigma 16mm f/1.4 more or less) . A7M3 + Sigma is more bang for your buck than A6600+ Sony 16-55. I sold my FF cameras and bought 2 A6100 which are great (300 less than A6400). This is tempting if in 2020 i may get a FF option. I bought also the RX100M7, which is really great for travel. Close to A6100 + 16-55 in daylight (at 200% you notice softer corners and less contrast, but otherwise hard to tell), The RX100M7 is better than a Sony APSC with the cheap kit zoom 16-50. Anyway great review. I think the 4mm at the wide end are a huge deal for a travel zoom. 28-75 may be ok for events, people photos/fashion, but too limiting for travel. buying a separate wide angle would cost more than the price difference between the Tamron and Sigma. Also switching lenses when traveling increases the risk of dust on the sensor, drops and spills.
@MRALLENLY4 жыл бұрын
The Sony 16-55 is weather sealed :)
@WRPhotography-zx5dv4 жыл бұрын
Awesome review, I already have the Tamron 28-75 so I will stay with it since I like the quality of my images and how light it is. When will you do a review of the Sony Ecb-B1m microphone? How does it work for loud music in weddings and live events?
@dennissilvas8824 жыл бұрын
"For vlogging... I would recommend something smaller and lighter." *Peter McKinnon has left the chat* *Insta360 One R has joined the chat*
@ChrisParayno4 жыл бұрын
Potato uses a c500🤣
@eccentricsmithy27464 жыл бұрын
Who cares about MsKinnon, he sniffs his own farts and is a sell out.
@akeema93744 жыл бұрын
@@eccentricsmithy2746 care to explain how ?
@jakejamesdougal4 жыл бұрын
Northside Keezy McKinnon has been loyal to Canon since day one. Some people are just salty about the success of others ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
@sachinmajotra96653 жыл бұрын
@@jakejamesdougal Be loyal but don't be stupid
@keyaniimmens47293 жыл бұрын
Yo Jason! Nice vid mate! I’m following you for a time so I’ve the kind of trust with your reviews 😂well you helped me also out with choosing between a Sony or a sigma! Sigma it is 💯
@STUDIOLEX3 жыл бұрын
Man I love your work ! Good to be back on track....!!!
@TomrerenDK4 жыл бұрын
Hej Jason. Great video as always. Can I get your opinion. I am debating if I Should get the sony 24-70 mm gm or the sigma 24-70mm. If money wasnt Something you factor in, which One would you pick?
@gfreeman23 Жыл бұрын
Yo Jason, great video! How were you able to zoom when the camera is on the gimbal? Doesn't that redistribute the weight which would make you need to rebalance the gimbal?
@LurkerPatrol54 жыл бұрын
Jason, I have the 24-105 F/4G from Sony right now and I absolutely love it. But for the shallower DoF and portraits I tend to use my canon 50mm f/1.4 (on a Sigma MC-hammer adapter). Would you recommend swapping the Sony with the Sigma?
@1FRANHER19 ай бұрын
three years later i'm having a similar situation, recenty bought my A6700 and a Sony 18-105 F/4G since it was somewhat affordable after spending on the camera itself, I've been enjoying it so far but sometimes i feel the need to have more aperture available when I try taking pictures of moving subjects. Did you get the Sigma lens? how did it go?
@nathanielngosy4 жыл бұрын
Hi Jason, Big thanks for an awesome review! May I have your opinion as to which option is better as I'm contemplating on investing on a Sony mirrorless system: 1. Option 1: A7iii + FE 24 1.4 GM + FE Sigma 24-70 DG DN ART. 2. Option 2: A7iii + FE 35 1.8 + FE 85 1.8 + Sigma 24-70 DG DN ART. I do love the 24mm FL as I did own a Nikon 24mm 1.4G then shooting with it ostly portraits, food, landscapes and cityscapes. Thank you Jason.
@RobertoBlake4 жыл бұрын
Jason you’re going to end up costing me money... 😂😂😂 also do they have a $16-35 coming out?
@stfurob31424 жыл бұрын
If im not wrong they already have a 18-35 f1.8
@iluvyunie4 жыл бұрын
a $16-35 lens would be a mad bargain
@johnhwang88813 жыл бұрын
Great review Jason. Came upon this video while doing research on this lens. Quick question: I noticed you are using the Sony mic in the footage of you in the 🌧 in Japan. Do you recommend this mic over the Rode mics?
@LouieTran4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this review! Definitely keeping my Tamron 28-75!
@TheFaizParadise4 жыл бұрын
What made you want the tamron over the sigma?
@redappletv2224 жыл бұрын
Been waiting for this video. Thanks.
@Int3rimo4 жыл бұрын
Great review as always! I am in the market to buy a standard zoom for my sony... the only option within my budget is the Tamron and this Sigma. I have seen a lot of people facing this issue with dust (just after a month or two). I really wanted to buy the Sigma but after reading those I want to go for Tamron. I guess you have used Sigma for a while, if so could you please post a picture of the front element or share your overall experience? Thanks!
@alexandrah.42444 жыл бұрын
24-70 mm is very versality👍👍... i use the Sony 24-70 GM Lens and i‘m happy with this lens. Today i‘ve bought the Sigma 14-24 Wideangle Lens and i‘m so curious about the Results 😀
@reelweaver4 жыл бұрын
I see you using the weebill S with sony. Do you have any connection issues? Do you have some kind of "smothness issues" when you go continuisly to one side. Like making a round focusing one object? I aks because i am having some issues where i dont know if its me or the gimbal. BTW nice video. I am waiting for my sigma 24-70 since 4 weeks. Gave back my sony 24-70 due to the close focus length and otherwise similar features.
@SimplementeLaura_4 жыл бұрын
I am so glad I haven't bought the 24-105 F4 yet, I can save up for this one instead! Thank you so much! :D
@morgiu2 жыл бұрын
I've sold this one for the sigma ahahah
@smpiggystudio3 жыл бұрын
At first I thought this is just a good lens of Sigma, I got it, but when I saw the close focusing part, I decide to order one right now...Thanks Vong for this great review, very very useful!
@fozzie31512 жыл бұрын
Sweet video! Very informative, I just purchased it as my first lens to pair with asiv. What gimbal were you using? I’m hoping to pick one up :)
@fjzm9992 Жыл бұрын
How is it going?? Is it dust free?? . Considering buying one, however I'm afraid of dust issue.
@RaynaTheLight2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the review. I just ordered this lens 🤞🏽 can’t wait to use it
@fjzm9992 Жыл бұрын
How is it going?? Is it dust free?? . Considering buying one, however I'm afraid of dust issue.
@krishnastock4 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this vid Jason! Which stabilizer are you using at 0:49 and 11:40?
@JeseeWalker4 жыл бұрын
Always such great content!
@SePark4 жыл бұрын
Haha zoom lens joke is level 9000! Great to finally meet you face to face at CES Jason!
@JasonVong4 жыл бұрын
Your photo on the zhiyun poster is freaking hilarious!
@SePark4 жыл бұрын
Jason Vong that’s gimbaling level 8999! 🤣🤣🤣 Once you set your branding I have to keep it for awhile.😅
@thevinceedward4 жыл бұрын
My thoughts are I don’t buy zooms for the bokeh. Having said that, I was particularly offended by the OOF rendering of the Tamron 28-75. It was just ugly to me. So I bought this because I don’t want to pay the GM prices for a zoom and it couldn’t be worse than the Tamron. It’s not. Nothing special, but it’s decided better than the Tamron for me and since it’s as good or better on everything else, especially the build quality, the Sigma wins for me
@johnhambyphotography4 жыл бұрын
I'm torn between the Sony 35mm and this Sigma 24-70. I'm an image quality freak but I can only afford one lens this year. If the Sigma quality is very close to Sony then I suppose I will go that way. Super low light is not a big deal for me.
@sydneysmith23884 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this video! I’m getting mine in the mail today 😁😁 what gimbal do you recommend with this lens set up?
@AJ360Ent Жыл бұрын
I ordered mine Yesterday, can’t wait 😛
@alfnazr3 жыл бұрын
Do you think it’s a better value than GM? If I’m interested in buying should I consider the sigma over GM?
@hurrworld4 жыл бұрын
Your reviews are my fav! Looking for the perfect all around lens for vlogging and photo/video. What would you recommend?
@atomikmaster14 жыл бұрын
Fantastic review. Thank you for the honesty 👍
@twotowersmedia4 жыл бұрын
Great video Jason. Love your work. I have the Tamron 28-75 on my A7iii is the Sigma worth changing to? I am a wedding videographer and would look to keep the Tamron as a backup and us the sigma as the main lens. Thanks bud keep up the good work
@spssystems4 жыл бұрын
Please tell me what is better for video shooting Sigma 24-70mm Art or Sony 24-70mm GM. I will rarely take photos. Sony A7 m3 camera
@rimofheaven3 жыл бұрын
Fun and beautiful review. Very informative and enjoyable at the same time. Thank you for making it.
@hazardstorms2264 жыл бұрын
Jason- Great video! I'm trying to decide between this lens and the sony 24-105 f4 for professional portraits of all types. Most importantly, is the Sigma sharper than the Sony?? I want the versatility of up to 105, but also want the best IQ. Thanks!
@dee-deeoverton13002 жыл бұрын
Nice video!! What gimbal were you using?
@ptobra4 жыл бұрын
Which mike do you use Jason? Details on how you make videos. Love your videos. Pisssssssss!!
@TheReneur4 жыл бұрын
Great video. It will be my next lens for sure. I just would like to ask, is that some new PSP at 9:31? :)
@tethadam864 жыл бұрын
Congratulkations Jason, youve convinced me to switch over to the ART series for both the wide 14-24 and swapping out my 28-75 for the 24-70. I thank you, my wallet hates you.
@JasonVong4 жыл бұрын
haha damn, it was that easy?? 😜😜😜
@tethadam864 жыл бұрын
@@JasonVong Well they say selling is an..... art. I'll see myself out.
4 жыл бұрын
I’m so undecided... can’t decide if getting the sigma 24-70 f2.8 or the Sony 70-200 f4... I know they are extremely different, but I have budget only for 1 lense... advice?
@reefoceania59544 жыл бұрын
Ive been waiting for this review, I just got updated that my sigma 24-70 art for Sony is 3 days away from arriving. Very excited to upgrade from the A7iii kit lens. Awesome video 💯
@SuperIceteapeach4 жыл бұрын
:'( I'm waiting since 30 days and have to wait now again for 40 days... feels so fuckin bad
@reefoceania59544 жыл бұрын
Why such a long wait? I ordered mine 12/05/19, won’t arrive until Thursday
@SuperIceteapeach4 жыл бұрын
@@reefoceania5954 sigma has problem with delivery... i dont know exactly, whats their problem is.. :s its feels like they will delay it again... still 30 days to wait :c
@kostasrestas4 жыл бұрын
Great ! Ive see some people to say that this lens came dusty from inside very easy and fast,is it true?? Is the only think that makes me think it twice before i buy one!
@michaelmorales44593 жыл бұрын
I keep reading about the dust problem online, but haven’t seen anything in any video reviews. The dust is the only reason I am hesitant to commit to this lens.
@sarimaproveyer2164 жыл бұрын
Hi! Great review! thank you for sharing your knowledge. I wanted to know your opinion about this lens on an a6300 body. Since the 6300 don't have in-body stabilization, Will the image stabilization be an issue?
@OptimusPrime-ys5vp4 жыл бұрын
Hi Jason, thank you very much for all videos. Can you please also add some footage that using lens with apsc body too? I saw your reviews are amazing.
@AlfaMedtech4 жыл бұрын
Should I go with the tamron 28-75or the sigma 24-70? I like traveling so I don’t know what’s more important the extra 4mm or carrying a lighter lens all day!? Also I’m between the Sony 1.8 or the rockenon 1.4 for portraits? HELP
@blacksap4 жыл бұрын
Really tempted but I think I will keep the tamron, thanks man!
@mbenjamin2923 жыл бұрын
I was thinking on this or tamron are you happy with the tamron?
@blacksap3 жыл бұрын
@@mbenjamin292 yup the tamron is good enough, smaller lighter, it has some advantages over the sigma, the most important is less distortion at the wide end, the sigma has this wierd mustache one
@JMGranadj4 жыл бұрын
I’ve sold my Sony Zeiss 16-35mm to buy this Sigma and then I ‘ve sold my Samyang 85mm f1.4 to buy new Sigma 85mm f1.4 dg dn. I have the Sony 24mm f1.4 G. Master. In the future I will need an ultra wide angle, prime or zoom.? Sigma 14-24? Thank you so much 😊
@BrainDesmo4 жыл бұрын
Jason, another good video. I got this lens for the L-mount 😀.
@Bearjumper553 жыл бұрын
I know this is an older video so maybe you could make another on this lens regarding the dust problem. I understand the new lenses have better seals but I'd still like your opinion.
@redbaronstudio86594 жыл бұрын
But how did it compare to sony 24-70 f2.8 GM overall? Maybe in your next video??
@jettysound27873 жыл бұрын
Great review Jason, how did this thing do in low light? Anyone else have some takes on this? cheers
@JCANPetros4 жыл бұрын
Hey Jason, thanks for the video...I might go with the Tamron because of the weight. Btw what are you using for your in-studio microphone setup?
@JasonVong4 жыл бұрын
Rode NT-USB!
@houstoninternationalmedia34084 жыл бұрын
I already have the Tamron 28-75 and I love it. Probably would have got this one if they came out at the same time though. However now I’m just waiting on that sigma 70-200 and 70-180 from Tamron to see which one of those I should get.
@bankphor4 жыл бұрын
Please compare between the "Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG DN Art for Sony" & the "Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 RXD Lens for Sony E". Thank you very much
@TXTundra-ex8bw2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for the great review I shoot primes (Sony 35mm 1.4 GM, Sigma 50mm 1.4 and Sigma 85mm 1.4) on my A7IV whenever I can because I'm a fast glass addict but this Sigma 24-70 is my safety net
@luckgod18574 жыл бұрын
when the sigma 70-200 f2.8comes out?
@ResizeFilms4 жыл бұрын
How’s the AF for video in low light conditions? Is it as reliable a the Sony GM 24-70mm?
@theprojectwithnoname4 жыл бұрын
Hi Jason, Tnx for the review! If focal length did not matter and image quality was most important (photo & video). would you choose the 16-55mmf2.8 or the 24-70mmf2.8 for the sony a6600?
@JasonVong4 жыл бұрын
16-55mm - more practical on APSC
@helencogan21874 жыл бұрын
Great video Jason. I have 2 Prime Sigma ARTs for my Canon..I agree they are heavy but TACH SHARP..I'll never buy a Canon Prime!! I don't shoot video..just stills..I do have the Tamron 28-75 and I am happy with it. It's not a Sony but for the price I make it work! Thanks again!!
@ResizeFilms4 жыл бұрын
How’s the AF for video? Is it as fast and reliable as the Sony GM 24-70mm f/2.8 in low light shooting video? Thank you for your time
@basmajajo49592 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for making such a useful video you made me buy this lens Sigma 24-70mmm
@tejateju70323 жыл бұрын
Hyy man! Just tell me which lens should I pick for my Sony a7r iii camera? Sony 24-105 f/4 or Sigma 24-70 f/28???
@MrSwaggernaut834 жыл бұрын
I would say that a lot of your gripes are with the 24-70 form factor not this lens in particular. In my opinion that's the type of stuff that doesn't really belong in the middle of the review for this lens (especially if it's lighter/smaller than other 24-70s). You did a good job explaining yourself but I think throwing in those two cents at the end is enough! Great video as always though!
@gusjaramill03 жыл бұрын
awesome, thank you very much, very helpful video, also i see that you have the weebil S, what where your setting to the motors since that setup is kinda front heavy. i heard from a creator that he had to sell the weebil S due to not working properly. thanks in advance !!
@yeet_420694 жыл бұрын
Yesss plz review the new Peak Design everyday backpack v2!
@AM1media4 жыл бұрын
Very informative and hella funny! I really don't mind the weight, so the for sharpness and this price-point... looks worth it. If the autofocus is legit, I'm buying.
@marclabro3 жыл бұрын
hi, nice review. for a future a7m4, would you advise this sigma DN ? I have heard that it should be better than sony for photo but less good AF and eye detection in video. a pity you didn't test the jump with 24-70 dn to see how it behaves.
@JacobChristiansen14 жыл бұрын
Jason, Do you think we will see a 24-70GM mark II? It seems like the GM is a bit dated (just sold mine) and that the sigma and tamron offers some benefits like being lighter and having close focus. I mean, Canon released two RF lenses that covers this focal length already. Maybe Sony could release an F2 as well
@shnu7773 жыл бұрын
You literally havethe best reviews bc you cover everything mostly.
@blueghost80573 жыл бұрын
Is this setup good/professional enough for wedding videography and photography?
@Tuberted2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Jason. Puns are useful for transitions. Even corny ones. :)
@brianduchateau4 жыл бұрын
Hi Jason, I'd like your opinion on the new PD Bags!
@l.p.10944 жыл бұрын
literally just left BH and tried out the lens on my A7R4, and yea that baby is sharp. not evening thinking twice about especially at the price point compared to GM. its a GO!
@AsianWithHat4 жыл бұрын
Good video! Now if only you could review the 35mm F1.2 Art. =D
@danielfarang87654 жыл бұрын
Is there a autofocus noise? Is the on camera audio useable ? thanks for this review
@polyviossimopoulos24363 жыл бұрын
Good review. A question: Is it possible to adjust and update this lens while mounted on a Sony camera, *without the need of purchasing and using the Sigma USB Dock?*
@simonericci54524 жыл бұрын
Hi Jason. Do you think this sigma or the tamron are good enough lenses to fully exploit the a7r4 high res sensor? Or better to just jump straight to the Sony GM?
@DashFlicks4 жыл бұрын
I would love to know if there is any difference between the canon version + mc11 and the native e-mount in terms of focus accuracy
@choind4 жыл бұрын
Hey Jason, which ND filter would you recommend for this lens? I usually shoot slog2! Shooting travel video. Thanks in advanced.
@cyrax834 жыл бұрын
Hi Jason, have you tested your lens? I found mine really lacked in sharpness. I tested at 70mm f/2.8 and the corners were blurry and the left side of the image was fairly blurry. Not sure if I had a bad copy but I sent it back to the store for further testing. They didn't have a replacement as it's sold out but waiting to hear back
@mohammedakhi8095 Жыл бұрын
A it still blurry
@HarshSharma-qq9bl Жыл бұрын
Dude, I was waiting for this, can you tell me whether it works with Sony A7S3 just like Sony GMII 24-70mm lens??
@cwarfield4 жыл бұрын
Yes, please do a review of the Peak Design bags/slings
@filoartisantrade4 жыл бұрын
thanks for the review Jason! very interesting. Have you tested this lens on a Sony body without Ibis like the A6400? Any thoughts on this combination? Thanks in advance.
@OfficeofthePacific3 жыл бұрын
Jason, I'm looking for a lens for a Sony A7Siii. I'm going to use the lens for shooting music videos... if you could only choose 2 lenses, what would be your top 2 choices? I need help. Thank you
@bartoszplo3 жыл бұрын
So now with Sigma 28-70 out - which one would you pick?
@naruhina67722 жыл бұрын
I just recently got the samyang 24-70 2.8 and in comparison what would you choose? Please reply