Andrew Branca on the State of Criminal Justice, Rittenhouse, and Zimmerman

Andrew Branca (lawofselfdefen...) joins to discuss the state of Criminal Prosecutions in the context of cases like Rittenhouse and Zimmerman in the current political climate.
Politicized prosecution is a danger to a free people.
#liberty #selfdefense

[@kylethornberry7074]

Theres no way the jurors are not letting outside influence affect their decision making. Nevermind prosecutorial malice and obvious civil rights violations

[@cheddar2648]

Juror 54 appears to be Komrade Karen, local political commissar and Chief Political Officer of the Kenosha Local Soyviet Teacher Union.

[@xLuis89x]

@@cheddar2648 how did she manage to pass the trial selection proccess???

[@rapunzel39]

@@xLuis89x she probably lied, like they always do.

[@Amphidex]

@@xLuis89x the defense didn't screen out the jurors...

[@mottathehutt6494]

I'm legally ignorant, but I don't understand why the jury wouldn't be sequestered. It seems like a practice that's more important than ever in the internet age.

[@bobsehested8111]

Tucker just reported that the identity of jump kick man was withheld from the defense. The attorneys better be writing the motion for Mistrial and drop it tomorrow

[@areyoutheregoditsmedave]

You’re assuming they’re competent

[@twoofrummer]

They already filed a motion, the judge won't rule on it until the prosecution responds, and he hasn't gave them a time frame to respond yet.

[@mamalupine7604]

Amen

[@AngryReptileKeeper]

First the high-res video, and now this? That's twice the prosecution has withheld evidence from the defense. That alone should trigger a mistrial with prejudice. It's prosecutorial malfeasance. Afterward, the prosecutors need to lose their jobs and face some criminal charges of their own.

[@AJHart-eg1ys]

Mistrial without prejudice is worthless to Kyle. They need to strengthen the language in their motion for mistrial with prejudice, or possibly withdraw it and refile to include the latest shady dealings unearthed regarding the state.

[@raulinhomaster]

the defense is so incredibly passive. While the prosecution doesn't stop arguing they barely let out a word. It's incredible

[@tomitylan5900]

They dont need to when the judge is so obviously biased. I believe kyle will get acquitted but its obvious with the judges behaviour throughout the trial his views

[@jamesestelle7260]

@@tomitylan5900 lol clearly. If he was biased he would have called a mistrial already. There is plenty of grounds. You know a judge is protecting the side of the defendant in every case. Or supposed to be. The judge is supposed to remain unbiased, however, the state has to prove without a reasonable doubt. If not the judge (unless having a jury) has to side with the defendant. The state has to provide the burden of proof. This judge has been fair

[@SuperFm101]

@@tomitylan5900 its not biased if he based his arguments on the actual law ... i love that people argue bias ...when the entire premise of the prosecutions case is based on preconceived notions and blatantly lying to the public and representing a prejudiced and heavily damaged image of the defendant by hiding information and manipulating evidence to frame him a certain way

[@Carteeeer52]

@@tomitylan5900 sperg

[@bcbp14]

@@Carteeeer52 what's that mean? Sperg

[@deniselarsen6285]

I can't believe anyone who saw trial may have thought KR was guilty.

[@covenator190]

Don’t have to believe it. Those who actually saw it know he is not guilty

[@liquidsnake6879]

The juror who is driving the prosecutions argument (Juror 54) already had her mind made up before the damn trial even took place, it's a matter of partisanship, she sides with wokeness and had already painted Rittenhouse in her mind as an evil murderer before the trial. Don't forget that all of these jurors have been watching news reports defaming Rittenhouse for a long long time before the trial ever started.

[@ShenCobra]

My entire frisbee team thinks he guilty and I’m standing there like 😑

[@perribru]

​@@ShenCobra Sorry to hear. They can't have seen a single minute of the trial, I presume.

[@PAGrunt]

I talked to someone YESTERDAY that still thought Kyle killed 3 black men

[@atthewhiskey]

This man is an invaluable guest. Truly fascinating listening to someone with that much knowledge of law. Lets just say, some guests are more equal than others. :D

[@Vyleea]

Its about time Nick asks him the ball questions. That will expose his true credibility.

[@AJHart-eg1ys]

I've been watching these rotating panelists for about 9 hours every day going back to early last week. Almost all of them have their stretches of being this good when there is something common or in their specific wheelhouse. But in Branca's case, he strictly does self-defense cases, so they're glad to have him there from time to time.

[@black_horse_lover2655]

Just like A.J. said. Every single one of the panelists have had really good takes like this. They are all really great guests! Not to mention they all have great humor too!

[@ArchGeek]

Agreed. Andrew Branca has a wealth of knowledge and experience, meanwhile Legal Bytes adds nearly nothing to streams other than the occasional annoying song (glad she stopped) and random common sense inserts.

[@clarissa8477]

@@ArchGeek she’s only there to grow her own following.

[@Palo_Duro]

I was shocked to hear Robert Barnes say that the Rittenhouse defense team declined to use Andrew Branca. What an idiotic decision. The most knowledgeable man on self-defense law in America? Nah, let's stick with Chair Slumper Richards and let the prosecution wreak HAV-OCCCK over us.

[@NidgeDFX]

HAV-OCCKKK!

[@xLuis89x]

*Your ownor, I request that SIngleMaltScotchy stops wrecking Hav- owk, it's bad for my reputation, correct? Your ownor*

[@sl3966]

They also declined the behavior panel guys for jury selection, and a video expert, and polling by Rrichard Baris. They are idiots. And now we see how Kyle is paying the price for their hubris.

[@brucemcfarlane8818]

@@sl3966 And all that for basically no cost. Barnes said he had a team better than OJ's dream team and they were all willing to work for free.

[@MaxiusTheGod]

The mind boggles at this decision.

[@thecryingshame]

Joe's final point about the success of the stream representing the feelings of a silent majority are spot on, imo. The issue with silence tho, is that it's hard to coordinate. The other side may be idiots, but they're organized idiots.

[@americafirst9144]

You have been tireless this week. Thank you for all of your updates.

[@factsmatter8258]

Branca breaks down self defense so eloquently and articulately. Awesome add to the live stream!

[@Pendarr7]

I have learned so much this week. Not a lawyer, just a retired air traffic controller and patriot. Well done on the good content!

[@tommythevenot7617]

While listening did you at least for a moment consider coming out of retirement and begin studying law? I’m 55 and the thought crossed my mind just from listening to these guys talk. It’s so very interesting and of course you’re trying to help people, etc. yeah I was imagining myself in my mid 60s taking my first law case!

[@ejodstl]

I graduated law school last year (law is my second career) and Andrew is right, the social justice oozes through the halls. There was no center or center-right professor and those of us that lean right were actively maligned.

[@PlatinumLemur]

You should try art school 30 years ago :(

[@thehylander266]

It’s a mind virus. It’s seeping throughout ALL our institutions and we are just now beginning to see the ramifications of it as millennials are going into more professional jobs as they replace boomers more. The worst is yet to come. This is just the beginning.

[@ejodstl]

I also have a M.S. and this mind rot wasn't in the sciences, at least 7 years ago. I was shocked when I went back.

[@primmakinsofis614]

@@thehylander266 _It’s a mind virus._ It's called communism. Yuri Bezmenov was right. (Right now, there are some old heads in the KGB laughing about how their long-term plan to stabilize the U.S and the West is now coming to fruition -- but three decades too late to save the Soviet Union.)

[@aarond98]

@@primmakinsofis614 - The liberals, socialists, poc supporters, white genociders, islam lovers, etc are living in a phase of "champagne socialism". When the communists take full control they will suffer greatly at the hands of the communist regime they brought into power.

[@Thomas-oc2ln]

Was one of my favorite moments of the stream, Branca was a great addition.

[@medfloat5001]

What a shame for Kyle that his defense team was whittled down to these two. Whomever made that decision should be ashamed of themself.

[@rickh9396]

Apparently Kyle's "spokesperson," David Hancock, who's been a frequent guest on Laura Ingraham, is calling all the shots. I have no idea why or what his qualifications are, but he comes across as very unimpressive. Kyle and/or his family seem to have placed their faith in the wrong person and handed him too much power over this situation.

[@brucemcfarlane8818]

@@rickh9396 I thought Ingraham had more sense than that. Shes a clever lawyer and youd think she'd smell a rat.

[@fluxington]

@@brucemcfarlane8818 She's presenting a show, not being a lawyer.

[@ShamanMcLamie]

According to Richard it was Kyle who fired the lawyers. Apparently he didn't like the lawyers trying to politicize the case.

[@brucemcfarlane8818]

@@ShamanMcLamie Talking about Lin Wood and John Pierce

[@suzannelove5147]

Loved listening to Andrew and the whole panel. Excellent coverage of the trial.

[@josesosa3337]

I'm scared for the future of this country.

[@mw3516405]

Me too

[@weridplusho]

The mention of SJW lawyers becoming judges is legit scary. You can't fix that by voting harder when _all_ the possible judges are from that pool.

[@TwistOfFate444]

Me too! So much that I’m already telling my 10 yo to start looking at colleges outside the country.

[@NewChachi]

@@TwistOfFate444 Its a global issue... look as far as you want, you'll never get away from it.

[@Lorenzo-nl2nh]

You will be hunted, socialy, financially and violently. That's the future for law abdin cietzens

[@15thobserver]

So can anyone from the legal council answer why it is that a prosecutor can outright lie to the judge, jury, and court without at bare minimum having their license suspended? My personal opinion is that justice would be served if they were sentenced the same way any one on the stand who commits perjury would be.

[@AJHart-eg1ys]

The judge could, but if you jingle your keys a little bit he'll just sit you on his knee and he'll tell you a story about Abraham Lincoln.

[@primmakinsofis614]

_So can anyone from the legal council answer why it is that a prosecutor can outright lie to the judge, jury, and court without at bare minimum having their license suspended?_ The simple answer: corruption is no longer punished. Corruption is no longer punished in law, in business, in policing, in medicine, in politics. And since there are no negative repercussions of any substance for being corrupt, more corruption takes place. Welcome to kleptocracy.

[@whalesmiff5712]

You guys/gals are changing the course of history for the better... God bless you all.

[@aneloragladius2509]

Andrew Branca is fascinating and I'm looking forward to a Rekieta one on one, under more relaxed circumstances. The streams are amazing and these clips are fantastic, for a bitesize piece of powerful information. Really great job on the overall coverage, varied commentary, interesting analysis and I've been hooked every minute. Many thanks to your guests, you and your family for sharing so much of your insight and your time, it's very much enjoyed and appreciated.

[@TwistOfFate444]

He’s just mind-boggling brilliant to me! We all need to add him to our contacts because if this verdict comes back incorrect and finds KR guilty of any charge…we’re all f’d!

[@barkingsteve]

Watching the trial from the U.K. i cannot believe how corrupt and deceitful the state is. So much for truth, justice and the American way :(

[@erin.v.m657]

I am addicted to this channel, and will not stop watching when and if we get some result for Kyle. I am so appreciative for the time, effort, and knowledge. Thank you !!!!

[@SamsungJ-xk9pt]

What are the chances that the jurors talk to their family and go on internet after they leave the court house at the end of the day?

[@cheddar2648]

Very high

[@MargieM10]

100%

[@stogiefan]

100%

[@no1youknow858]

Of course they will. The problem is their habituation to social media. Most of them undoubtedly check it several times a day, and it's hard to break a habit. It's like asking a bunch of cocaine users to refrain from using the free cocaine in their rooms for the next twenty days. Not gonna happen.

[@thehylander266]

I am sure the leftists ones go back to their families and propaganda media outlets.

[@betafastacheapa]

Some people, notably Tim Pool, say that "Kyle shouldn't have been there." To which, I propose, the opposite: Kyle is the only person who was there, who should have been there. He was rendering first aid, putting out fires, protecting property, and when forced to, himself. Kyle was the only person doing the right thing. Not only should he have been there, there should have been a thousand more people just like him there. The fact that there wasn't, and that we are punishing the only person who did the right thing, is a condemnation of us all.

[@gothicwestern]

Well said but I do wonder if all the hundreds of thousands of Americans who poured 1st A rights bravado all over the internet but did sweet fa in 2020 actually recognised the gravity of the political situation whereas a naive 17yr old hadn't understood how culture had shifted away from objectivity.

[@poohbear30611]

Boom. If the police and fire department of Kenosha was out doing their jobs and if all the MEN of Kenosha had been in the streets shutting down rioters and protecting their city would a 17 year old have felt the need to fill the gap left wide open by so many gutless and apathetic elders?

[@bocefusmurica4340]

Welp, Tim Pool is a mealy mouthed semi recovered Leftist, soooo. He promptly threw Alex Jones under the bus and refused to defend the lies the urinalists said about him on Tim’s show.

[@tdub7130]

This week I learned how incredibly dishonest a district attorney will be and how politicized the system is. Sad.

[@cheddar2648]

All of this is _EXACTLY_ what The Internet was built to engender.

[@Un1234l]

Exactly. I would forgive all the bullshit and grief that social media and mass internet has brought us the last 10 years, if it leads to a mass red pilling of how the world works, exposing the corruption, educating the masses that the world is not as wonderful and stable as it used to seem. Give transparency to how things work, make people see through the lies.

[@drifter402]

@@Un1234l problem is the web has been monopolised.

[@robbie_]

So corrupt. Institutions are absolutely rotten to the core.

[@AngryReptileKeeper]

All of them. Without exception.

[@highthereguys]

Keep up the good fight Rekieta! Respect

[@patriotic_salt]

Many rounds of applause for the channel and the panel...Thanks for the analysis

[@michaelnaak]

I have four young children, and it's scary because I can't tell them, "Trust the police. Trust the system." The fact that prosecutors from across the country aren't condemning this sham tells me enough about the fallen state of our justice system from bottom to top.

[@thehylander266]

Soon the police will be the ones who will be knocking on our doors to arrest or fine us for saying gender isn’t a social construct or not allowing our kids who got brainwashed in school to want a sex change at the age of 7, like they’re doing now in the UK. And those spineless cops will say “we’re just following orders.” This is why I am no longer a “bald the blue.” Just look at what’s going on with the unconditional red flag laws..

[@chrisrowland2223]

I know the panel does not think this will be a critical case as case study for law, but this case and the polarizing publicity of this case is highlighting how corrupt the judicial system can appear from the outside for political motivations. This case also shows the need for true layman explanation of the sometimes confusing legal terms or conflicting laws and rules. This case also highlights how the historical and Social medias have shoved their way into "becoming" a 4th branch of the American government, and media institutions have created numerous biases and narratives pushing a political /societal views. Reketia Law and his panel have been doing a great job of breaking each part of this trial down while explaining what the law states or how the court procedure works. They also take the time to play devil's advocate and use simple, easy to understand examples to explain US and states constitutional laws.

[@AJHart-eg1ys]

Yes. It will mostly be a case study in the circus surrounding the case, rather than how the case unfolded. When the DO show clips from the trial, I assume "Yakkity Sax" will be playing in the background.

[@ShadowtheRenamon]

In a way it was always intended for "The Media" to be a fourth branch in a way. Jefferson believed heavily in the idea of free press and news. That is why freedom of the press is part of the first amendment by name. It's purpose is to be the voice of the people and the check on the government's power and a way for the government to communicate back to the people. But big money interests and the like have, like in all things, corrupted it. Taken it from the voice of the people to the voice of who ever has a big enough wallet. As to the Layperson explanation, I agree whole heartedly. Not just for trail proceedings, but for most laws. If you can't explain to someone with a high school education what the purpose of a law is and how it is to be followed, then there is either a problem with the law, the education system, or both.

[@romulasp1928]

This case will have a chilling effect on people defending themselves. I will hesitate as my mind flashes to this obvious case of self defense and the railroading that the State has done...

[@jaxblaster84]

As a resident of Jacksonville, we now have one that give slaps on wrist for gun charges and wonders why crimes are up. There’s got to be honesty and trustworthy on all sides. If you’re guilty the evidence will show if you’re innocent the evidence will show.

[@areyoutheregoditsmedave]

We live in deeply dishonest times and our world is steered by deeply dishonest men

[@primmakinsofis614]

@@areyoutheregoditsmedave Welcome to the kleptocracy.

[@magetsalive5162]

The Invoice of Lawyers needs to be a regular thing from now on, set up a website off YT and accept donations direct so people don't have to pay googs even one red cent.

[@shaunclark850]

I am truly fascinated and addicted to you and the other folks on the stream. Keep up the good work you bring so much to the table in debate and chat. 👍

[@MeatandTatersGaming54]

Andrew has a truly special way of breaking things down, he needs to become a regular guest.

[@Joural0401]

We know schroeder isnt biased for kyle because if he was he would have finished his sentence and gift wrapped the mistrial for the defense

[@liquidsnake6879]

Schroeder isn't biased either way, but he's a coward and that's the problem cause there's no way that if this trial wasn't being televised and wasn't being followed so attentively by the media he wouldn've declared a mistrial by now and would not have accepted the blurry footage that juror 54 is now focusing on into evidence. The only reason we're in this situation is because the judge wasn't prepared for the high stakes of the case and is being a coward when faced media scrutiny which he admits he has been following.

[@johnpenn74]

Don't you see what this really is? It's a challenge to 2nd amendment. If Kyle is convicted for taking his personal firearm and that is considered premeditated, then any legal carry becomes grounds for intentional /premeditated murder, doesn't matter if self defense. You'll be guilty of premeditated assult or what ever.

[@AJHart-eg1ys]

Half right. The first domino is eliminating the right to self defense. From there, I agree that it suddenly becomes even more scary to walk around carrying in the event you have to defend yourself.

[@SirPunch2Face]

It's not even that. It wasn't Kyle's gun. It was someone else's gun that they let him use that night. That's why the entire story about him "crossing state lines with a firearm" was completely false from the start.

[@nicoedits2810]

It is not a challenge to 2nd amendment. It might be a challenge to open carry but those are two different arguments. the 2nd amendment doesn't prevent the regulation of firearms and open carry can be legislated.

[@PAGrunt]

I agree it's a anti 2A case, but it mostly is an anti self defense case. It's like the government (and law enforcement) can abandon you, yet you have zero recourse against the mob coming to destroy, loot, commit arson, and assault people.

[@anonymityt2681]

Hell yeah, love these clips.... And perfect amount of time to watch before the jack show

[@heathalbritton]

Kyle is going to to go to prison and it will be his lazy defense attorney's fault as well as the judges fault. The judge has said multiple times that there better not be one more issue or incident from the prosecution, yet there was. There has been issue after issue, incident after incident and the defense just sits back, makes a face, grabs the table, and doesn't do anything else. The judge just allows the prosecution to do and say what they want.

[@ChamplainValleyRailSnapshots]

Yeah. It's been: Don't do that thing again or I'll give you another stern lecture.

[@twoofrummer]

The judge has not ruled yet on the motion for dismiss. If he is found guilty, he will rule it a mistrial

[@caseystrong9481]

@@twoofrummer The problem is the judge who is too scared to rule now will reverse the verdict?

[@AngryReptileKeeper]

The judge didn't even sequester the jury, which is beyond irresponsible. If he understands the gravity of this situation, he's not acting like it.

[@varkofard7144]

How many of the 400+ times Binger appeared before this figurehead judge have been railroaded. Hated this Judge from day one and it just gets worse everyday.

[@loganorr6145]

4doorsmorewhores did nothing wrong

[@SecularReasons]

Funny. I don't think that hurt him one bit.

[@areyoutheregoditsmedave]

It says 4doorsmoresmores he’s a good boy

[@amibrainwashed]

Bruh, he was just tryna be famous.

[@peteschultz5047]

Andrew Branca is the man. Amazing insight into the situation.

[@viimaurice3131]

Keep hitting it strong and straight good law people! Godspeed!!!

[@Source88990]

I heard this, was xcellent.ty. God bless you all.see you in the morning

[@danielgarcesespitia6251]

Lawyers think with the mindset of an "individual" most people are "followers" they have no desire to know anything outside of what theyre told or desire to lead..its simply too much ..and the ones that actually take the time to dissect events like this and exercise judgement we are labeled "conspiracy theorists" which is the EASY way out of any argument for people who refuse to have a conversation ..they are in simpler terms EXTREMELY COMPLACENT

[@kansasblues]

i’ve just read on Fox news that the prosecution new the identity of the jump kick man and didn’t disclose that. if so isn’t that grounds for mistrial with prejudice?

[@SirPunch2Face]

Yes. You can just add it to the list of the 17 other things they've done that are grounds for mistrial with prejudice.

[@MargieM10]

Of course it is, it _all_ is but the judge is more worried about his public image than the outright violations of Kyle's constitutional rights!

[@jimreaper1337]

The incompetent judge is hoping the jury saves his ass with a Not Guilty verdict... The jury is hoping the judge saves them with a mistrial Yet the jury is now split 6-6 (it was 2 hold outs) and i think they will convict, despite the malicious prosecution all the obvious bullshit, multiple rights violations and the wild entering of even wilder evidence

[@danielkelly1210]

Maurice Freeland

[@im_a_usbcable1618]

@@jimreaper1337 where are you hearing 6-6? I was hearing 10-2?

[@Dapperdave-gg6vx]

The thought of a "Judge Binger" is my worst nightmare... Imagine the legal system full of "Judge Binger"....

[@cryptokeeper7925]

They'd have to rename it the lethal system. We'll have power shortages with the amount of innocent people sent to fry

[@cynthiathomas5754]

Learned so much from Andrew. As certain states get more bizarre in their parameters for self defense, it's best to keep up and avoid suprises.

[@Mr.Thermistor7228]

I watched highlights of the Zimmerman final closing arguments and to see the emotion that the lawyers had is unbelievable compared to Kyle's complete lack of emotion from his lawyers. Kyle deserves so much better

[@alisoncole3211]

Thanks a lot for all you’ve done with your buddies! I love it!

[@andrewtucker7990]

I truly respect Andrew Branca. I ordered his book, from his website, yesterday. He, seems to be, a truly honest man. Most other people would charge, for profit. He knows it's valuable information, that can save a person's life from imprisonment. He gives it away and all you have to do is pay shipping. Honestly wonderful.

[@briannxx]

Yes most other people would make a profit off their intellectual property because it’s morally right! Finding a guy wealthy enough to offer a free book doesn’t mean profit bad lol wtf

[@jamierogers4530]

Geez Nick, THANK YOU for cutting this! Easily an hour or so of Andrew Branca yesterday, but anytime, could have been cut. What a lesson.

[@CaraBree]

I tune in with you guys all hours that you are on. The information that you share is amazing! Thank you.

[@apexlax34]

Andrew Branca is a fighter. Have loved him and legal insurrection since Zimmerman almost a decade ago lol. He was based truth OG (I’m 30 so time is relative ha)

[@TheGeneralWorldofTanksReplays]

Can I thank all of the panel for their legal insight. This stream was so entertaining and educational. We need more panels like this because the insight to legal cases and politics explains so many stories way better than the press do. I'm very pleased to have subscribed to each of the lawyers in this panel. Long live the Rekieta Dream Team Stream.

[@Tdubya4567]

It is now time for Rittenhouse to sue the crap out of the MSM

[@chainer2322]

The way they hype Nick up at the end and then the video cuts to a cheery custom lil jingle was priceless.

[@theflyingdropbear2009]

the problem is, the Judge gave enough rope for the prosecution to run roughshod over the case, presenting tampered evidence to try and convict a young lad for purely political purposes, the defense team just sat back and let it happen, while Kyle's life was hanging in the balance, it was almost as if they didn't fully understand or care about what was really on the line, Flufferboy and Hamburgler just did as they pleased while violating Kyle's constitutional rights. If the judge had any bite to back up his bark, he should have dismissed this case with prejudice, regardless of what happens, it would be a true miscarriage of justice.

[@xLuis89x]

More like the defense isn't doing shit, so , the prosecutor breaks loose and starts their hav- owk

[@theflyingdropbear2009]

@@xLuis89x there is only one way to describe this trial. a Kangaroo Court.

[@rapunzel39]

Let’s just admit that your guilt or innocence, in modern day America, is determined by the color of your skin, and your political affiliation.

[@drewdrewson1384]

doesn't it bother you that this many brilliant minds who know so much about the law don't seem to understand the country. Reminded when people on the right kept saying the chauvin trial would be overturned on appeal or a mistrial or that he would even get off. Insanity to think the facts matter at all in these cases.

[@chrisrowland2223]

It also has to do with whether the "Mob" accepts you. Remember their was that one lawyer couple in St. Louis who were the "right" part affiliation, yet they were crucified for using firearms to protect their property within an enclosed, privately gates community inside the city.

[@drewdrewson1384]

@Parker Voller sounds like you don't understand what I am saying. Let me guess you also thought that the lawyers in NYC that molotoved a cop car would get long prison sentences. Or you thought that the fbi would investigate and put antifa or blm rioters in prison for their on camera assaults

[@thefool8224]

@@drewdrewson1384 .it doesnt matter what happens to him, damage already done, and people who wanted him convicted already moved on to their new target. if for some miracle he manages to appeal we might not even hear about it, and if we do it will just be a repeat of the last time

[@drewdrewson1384]

@@thefool8224 are you insane? If he has an appeal it would be the biggest story in the country. I asked a lawyer from new york about a case where the brooklyn da took a plea for a guy who stabbed his wife to death even though he had confessed (dude got like 15 years only). he was cold blooded about explaining why they would take a deal. It came out in conversation that im from minneapolis and this lawyer brought up how sad and terrible the case was and how he had a hard time thinking anyone could be that evil. Do you understand that the facts do not matter at all. It's all 100% narrative

[@shade_221]

Thanks for clipping that out it was an interesting discussion and the point about the Zimmerman miss-information is spot on and still an ongoing problem.

[@primafacie5029]

Andrew is worthy of much respect for his expertise and competence

[@nonstopmom36]

Today I learned Bingers middle name is Clair !!! 🤣🤣🤣 suits him well !

[@rmp5s]

Nick! I did digital forensics for a couple years, I've worked in IT for over a decade, I used to have my FAA Part 107 and I've been a photographer/videographer for years! I think I have an interesting perspective on the "drone video"! I'd love to talk! I was also in UAV squadrons in the Corps for 5 years...let's talk the FBI "PoI" video!

[@docastrov9013]

Love Andrew Branca.

[@chrisnewbury3793]

Justice has been taking a nosedive since prohibition at the latest.

[@AngryReptileKeeper]

This is nothing new in human history. Same $hit, different century.

[@chrisnewbury3793]

@@AngryReptileKeeper yes and we were supposed to be better. Most of our spoiled populace thinks freedom is the rule, and tyranny the exception. They're learning though, quickly.

[@ladyphoenixgrey3923]

Get active local and clean these evil, self-serving people out. Then move up the chain.

[@josiahmorris5799]

Your first, Phoenix. Lead the way.

[@JB43186]

Thank you!!!

[@cainancainan]

Spent so much time listening to you all this past 2 weeks, thanks for the analysis and for the entertainment. Free Kyle

[@johnwick8756]

Love watching these panels and seeing the way yall think. Hope yall continue to do this after the Rittenhouse case. I've listened to 99% of this coverage since day one.

[@EJ-jw9ow]

I've said this 100 times during the daily streams, this is literally law porn. I've never seen anything like this, and speaking for myself and all the other constitution/law nerds out there, I've been waiting my entire life to find something like this. A big ole group of lawyers debating and dissenting cases/precedents and trading war stories of cases and law school. Law. Porn. I'm so hooked on this its unhealthy.

[@jimd8008]

Thank you again

[@rachelmarin6758]

Thank you you all!!!

[@angelaomeara6875]

Andrew is the bomb! brillant

[@BKetch]

Wow! So what Andrew was saying how you can show people evidence that shows they are wrong and they just dig in deeper. Happens in every comment section on a story.

[@AngryReptileKeeper]

And it works regardless of one's sociopolitical leaning or belief system.

[@eddiebruv]

A bit like arguing with flat Earthers.

[@SugaryCoyote]

I was arguing with someone on youtube about how Kyle legally possessed and carried the rifle. Even after the charge was dropped they still would not admit they were wrong.

[@BKetch]

@@SugaryCoyote yea people are not coming off that part. Like a way to discredit everything.

[@thefool8224]

@@SugaryCoyote .well, if after today they try arguing about kyle's guilt. just say to their faces "NOT GUILTY of all charges"

[@SirTickleTots]

I did not know of Andrew Branca before watching this case’s streams. But I can tell you the man does not miss.

[@jamesmerone]

Nick, please have Andrew Branca on the show.

[@jakobrothoff4564]

This actually one of the best things in YT all year

[@brucelittrell781]

So interesting, and enlightening. Thanks folks. Happy Thanksgiving

[@Joe-Brandon]

Rekieta I love your channel

[@asdaww.4084]

I admit I did think George Zimmerman was told not to pursue Skittles Jackson. But it was never a pivotal fact for me.

[@lasombra120680]

It was all good until Martin returned to the scene and attacked Zim. At that point, the law was clear.

[@nickynoir6878]

@@lasombra120680 Bbbbut he wuz jUS a keeeeed! A poe lil keeeeeeeeed!!!

[@lasombra120680]

@@nickynoir6878 lol yup, always. He was gonna be a rapper or something. Every time.

[@bocefusmurica4340]

He was. But not by a cop. A dispatcher. Who has zero authority and is not a police officer.

[@pinkycatcher]

During this conversation today, Branca I believe brought up that deadly force in Colorado (Make my day) is the only law that allows deadly force without facing deadly force or fear for your life. But in Texas Section 9.42 allows you to protect not only just your property, but the property of a third party with deadly force. Notably this came up in the Joe Horn case.

[@bocefusmurica4340]

You hear my shotgun clicking and I’m going! Texas Joe Horn

[@Captainchokeout3994]

Hope you’re well Nick. Great streams. I missed you on The Jack Show. Hopefully next time

[@garnetnard4284]

Lawyer Matt enjoyed watching this stream as much as I did.

[@inside8893]

Andrew is GOAT

[@n_maldo7567]

Love the intro music! Thank you for everything you do

[@TheBritishPatriot]

Andrew sounds like a phenomenal Lawyer from what I’ve heard from him over the past few days (as do the rest of you), I especially enjoyed his statements today about the 2A, which were spot on! America needs more lawyers like y’all and less like Binger, Krause and the lefty Twitter Lawyers. And I’m not just saying this because I agree with you all politically or on this specific case, it’s the fact that you all always try your best to apply the law objectively, interpreting it as it is written and as it pertains to the constitution, being fair and just (in the original sense of the word) and not twisting things to fit a certain narrative, much like Judge Schroeder tbh, who, although we’ve been very critical of for not ruling on mistrial and giving the prosecution too much leniency, has also been really fair and balance even though he clearly has a leaning both politically and on this case.

[@self-study3324]

I dropped out of college because of the indoctrination and people around me always tell me I should have went through with it and bit my tongue. It is glad to see that what I saw was objective to multiple people in this video. It helps me understand even more that it wasn't weakness that led me to leave, it was strength.

[@thevezz1]

I just discovered your podcast today from Canconn. I subscribed to you today as I really enjoyed this a lot. I look forward to hearing more and hope KZbin sends the notifications. Thank you for doing this.

[@Arm-Your-Friends]

I sincerely hope on day I get the chance to pick his brain. you having him on the stream is a game changer. we appreciate y’all

[@PeterP_777]

Branca gives an excellent critique of the Rittenhouse defense team's closing arguments on his website. Highly recommend.

[@lillymuddflower1200]

Yes. Please these horrible prosecutors must go.

[@GoodLawgic]

I feel bad that I kept talking over Matt in this clip.

[@sststr]

There's one way this case can fail to be a win-win for Binger - if the judge has him arrested for corruption or any of a variety of other charges he no doubt could be brought up on given his conduct during this trial, and he ends up in jail. A jailed Binger is a dead-in-the-water Binger as far as any political aspirations go.

[@TheNthomas1999]

Dude, people on the left at this point and can murder, rape and plunder and nothing will ever happen. Face it, the state is the left at this point and there is no rule of law. The right has all of the societal pressure, where the left has none.

[@MargieM10]

That will never happen though.

[@thefool8224]

thinking you can still use the system that is fully under their control to punish them is just lunacy.

[@TwistOfFate444]

The state has a certain level of immunity so this will never happen to any prosecutor. Best you can hope for is the bar disciplines him and maybe a tiny financial sanction from the judge. Pathetic, I know!

[@ardias40k]

I hope Andrew becomes a regular guest!

[@lukeyguy965]

Someone on Twitter just posted. That jury has broken laws taking them papers home today. How true is that?

[@pandabrittful]

The judge allowed it. The defense actually objected but the judge let her bring them home.

[@uclajd]

Branca and Barnes in the same video, good stuff!

[@cledgefenrir5681]

My friend just sent me the message "juror dismissed" without further context. I see that there was a juror dismissed on the 4th but any others?

[@youvandal411vm]

Barnes is the man. Glad I found this sub.

[@roymustang5922]

I take it the jury still can't make up their mind?

[@scawarren]

Correct

[@roymustang5922]

@Super Genius I have been hearing that. Is she the only hold out?

[@chrisrowland2223]

Super Karen is the foreperson, so yeah she is holding out while her handlers finish setting up Kenosha for their "November of Festivities"

[@almond3066]

Is there any proof the foreman is a Karen? I haven't caught up much yet so I'm not sure

[@chrisrowland2223]

@@almond3066 The panel earlier on the Reketia Law stream were explaining handwriting analysis. Nick, Richards, and Andrew all agreed it was a high likelihood that the foreperson was an upper class female who is use to being in charge or giving commands. She is also not use to using Mister or Missus before a name as well as a few other comments about word and phrase choices. Seemed like a fair assessment of the stereotypical Karen attitude and demeanor

[@anonymouscitizen8680]

It is a shame and a real step backwards how States have relied on these backhanded tactics against a citizen or citizens. It shows an impotence and lack of confidence in a Judicial system that we are supposed to be able to trust to be fair and factual. When prosecutors have to act like criminals to falsely narrate upon a case, what do we do to get things back in line? Very dangerous times. I am not going to take a beating because some broken prosecutor thinks that is better than constitutionally protecting myself.

[@mjcard]

Binger will end up on CNN.

[@timothyelhajj8404]

I want the truth Andrew!

[@danielgarcesespitia6251]

These* lawyers i meant to say definitely a very small group that think and speak they way you guys do ..you guys give light to the idea that not all lawyers bank off a lack of conscience