Are Coen Witchers Back? (Gwent Northern Realms Shieldwall Deck)

Deck: www.playgwent.com/en/decks/1a...
0:00 Intro and Deck
6:26 Game 1: Endless Voyage Pirates
18:26 Game 2: Clog Kolgrim
27:20 Game 3: Tatterwing AQ
40:58 Game 4: Renfri Koshchey
48:34 Game 5: Raid Warriors
59:01 Summary and Options

[@platinumpatrol2964]

I can't believe I forgot to mention this in the video, but if your Griffin Witcher lives you should play Sangreal on it, especially if its Adrenaline has triggered. It'll Purify it, shoot its 3 damage again, and then lock itself to cancel the Infused effect.

[@BrutusRPG]

Great seeing an archetype like NR Witchers get the love they deserve, as always thanks for the video

[@nimascolari1508]

There's love then there's ruining the game. Bullshit council is literally a select few mainly Russian pushing an agenda. The buffs were OP and the Nerfs were designed to make the buffs even more OP. The meta will be 2/3 decks rinse and repeat. Raid didn't a buff but got it. Dwarves, too while they ruined NG's win condition for poison. As an ST player I don't like what they did to NG.

[@BiggusDingus325]

Yeah. This griffin witcher adept is basically a ethereal for 4 prov. And theres 2 of them. But F anyones opinion if you are not in the top 10. ​@@nimascolari1508

[@MyOtheHedgeFox]

Ah, two of my favorite cores - the Witchers core and the Shields core, finally intermeshed together properly! =) I absolutely relish the Griffin Witcher's complete and total immunity to the Sangreal "hangover"! A match made in pursuit of bloody strigas. Speaking of -- AFAIK Coёn's name is pronounced closer to "Coy-on" in the original. Just like Fucusya is actually "Foo-koos-yah", a very Slavic mysterious-origins-village-waif name.

[@platinumpatrol2964]

Thanks for letting me know!

[@andthingsofthisnature]

Your deck videos are always fantastic!

[@onraj7847]

I've been running a similar deck, but instead of Amphibious assault i use Triss/dandelion + Uprising to boost Coën up. I've been winning non stop, its bascially a Golden nekker deck that combines your last NR witcher deck you made (video you made 8 jan.) with this one. With some extras like dandelion + Uprising for when triss doesn't show up for the Cöen boost along with Vesemir Lambert Eskel trio for thinning and two wyvern scale shields for Windhalm, Roegner and Keldar. The deck has been so strong i've been winning pushing round 1 and not even getting Nekker round 2 but somehow even still win round 2 when all i wanted to do is bleed him. You should def try it out sometime

[@onraj7847]

Seems i cannot share the deck link, but if anyone wants to try the deck: Use the standard URL for deck sharing and after /decks/ add: "1132da1908978a485e61e600e10b42b7"

[@jaso7839]

Could you share the deck list?

[@onraj7847]

@@jaso7839 i tried to earlier, seems i cannot post links in comments which is understandable

[@onraj7847]

@@jaso7839 e0b02357e3661b5dde813f351be6c890 This is the deck id that should come after /decks/ in the link. This is the only way i know i can share it

[@jaso7839]

@@onraj7847 fair. Maybe post the link without the https

[@maruanghoneim2523]

I‘m using coen in my melitele deck. In round 3 if I get boost 2&3 on the cows (from the cow spawn guy) they will be on 6 power and with traveling priestess i boost coen to 6 and all other possible units. It is kind of unnecessary since its kind of „win-more“ but its fun

[@platinumpatrol2964]

A lot of the win more strategies are fun

[@er4din903]

You may also want to run a knight errant I. This deck and vandergrift

[@platinumpatrol2964]

They're both pretty decent options

[@LordObsidian1250]

should have hit the armor on the sappers with professional to clog them

[@bigbywolf5305]

Can u play a draft in one video ?

[@platinumpatrol2964]

Sure

[@rihardslusis4482]

Love your videos 🩶🃏

[@frankbroz4964]

Good to see shieldwall good again. Did you get to play Coen at all tho?

[@platinumpatrol2964]

Yes but he only boosted 3 or 4 guys. I really wanted to get a big Coen for the video and ended up playing an extra game more than I intended but sadly I didn't get a good opportunity.

[@hko2006]

round 4 mr oppo hand💀

[@ortizv84]

Why not all premiums?

[@platinumpatrol2964]

Not enough Meteorite Powder :(

[@janr.9169]

1st

[@LuzikArbuzik77]

Do you really think making a bronze etheral for 4 p was a good balance decision? Bruh

[@platinumpatrol2964]

Like I said, I believe the intention is to make it 5 for 5p but you can't do both changes at the same time. It saw basically no play as it was.

[@BiggusDingus325]

​@@platinumpatrol2964 if that was the case they would have pushed it to 5p first instead to be safe. I dont believe they have any intention on making it 5p. Bronze ethreal for 4 provisions. But its NR so its okay.

[@zagaant7233]

what this guy said @@BiggusDingus325

[@platinumpatrol2964]

It's possible they don't intend to, but that's what I heard. Also, I disagree with making it 5p first for a couple reasons. If that was done it would likely just get reverted back to 4p by people who didn't realize it was also going to be buffed. It's possible the card is fine at 5p like how Ethereal is after its buff which a lot of people were scared of, and we wouldn't get to find that out if it was changed to 5p first. @@BiggusDingus325

[@EsteemedReptile]

Here we go, all the brainless copypasting bots are now running out and picking up this meta off the shelf like the shameless, boring, lock stepping goons they are.