Semi automatic with only two rounds capacity. So it is capable of doing the exact same thing as a double barrel but with significantly more complexity and chance for malfunction. Excellent!!
@millroll976 жыл бұрын
Brilliant! Just like the early M16's!! How could it possibly go wrong haha
@michaelmurphy99726 жыл бұрын
Funny
@0604H6 жыл бұрын
bUt ItS liGhTeR 😂😂 Such a nice shotgun but only 2 shots killed it 😂
@phillipcastro23945 жыл бұрын
Who ever made this thing should be beat with it
@daniellau58595 жыл бұрын
Its for show, like most things in this world. You take this into battle and youre a special type of stupid lol.
@MrEvanfriend6 жыл бұрын
Hard to load, two round capacity, cheap looking plastic furniture, aluminum barrel, and kicks like a mule? I can't imagine why these weren't a commercial success.
@kevinsullivan34486 жыл бұрын
Would be cool for a collect5ion, though. And to squik your tough guy friends bt tricking them into shooting it.
@zevo93145 жыл бұрын
to be fair... considering it hadnt been done before, i'm guessing they underestimated how much it would kick, and how many rounds people put through a shotgun in one sitting. their goal was to make the lightest shotgun possible, and you could say they did that. and the cheap plastic furniture was a compromise made on quite a few guns of that era to save on weight, and polymer wasnt really a thing in guns yet, so i'll even give them a pass on that. but an over engineered semi auto platform with less functionality than a double barrel, thats not forgivable. hell they coulda made the exact same aluminum frame and barrel with plastic furniture on a double barrel and done better
@AM-hf9kk5 жыл бұрын
@@zevo9314 Give it a removable box magazine and it would be a hit with today's tactical community.
@CThyran5 жыл бұрын
@@AM-hf9kk Until they break their shoulders that is.
@garymckee88574 жыл бұрын
Yes I would have bought two of them.
@RevOwOlutionary5 жыл бұрын
"The world's lightest shotgun" I could feel my shoulder being dislocated just from the sound of those words.
@overlorddante4 жыл бұрын
Ikr? Something like a shotgun benefits from weight. Takes some kick out of the kick.
@jt0n4 жыл бұрын
if i tried to fire this i'd be launched into the air
@ramz16k4 жыл бұрын
C r a c k
@overlorddante4 жыл бұрын
@Roderick storey you'd want more weight towards the front to help with recoil.
@shilohstore60864 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@AirJimInCT6 жыл бұрын
We have seen many different versions of Ian over the years. Civil War Ian, Secret WWI Agent Ian, etc. But this iteration is my favorite so far........Aluminum Salesman Ian.
@nuttex6 жыл бұрын
Gangsta Ian with a Jennings 9 is my favourite iteration of Ian.
@borisbuliak36266 жыл бұрын
I dunno die CIA pig kinda took the cake for me.
@chriscontact58575 жыл бұрын
Tin Men
@Rickmon015 жыл бұрын
Aluminum gun Jesus of tomorrow
@williestyle354 жыл бұрын
Now we have "cold war spy" ( 007 ) Ian. See: InRangeTV , 007
@warmongerairsoft6 жыл бұрын
Was so excited.... Then he said “2 round capacity” It just got worse and worse from there
@borismuller866 жыл бұрын
WarMonger Airsoft surely it could have had a magazine...?
@warmongerairsoft6 жыл бұрын
Boris Müller you mean like an adapter?
@borismuller866 жыл бұрын
WarMonger Airsoft would that work with that feeding system?
@warmongerairsoft6 жыл бұрын
Boris Müller dunno, maybe. You’d probably have to get rid of that bar that holds the reserve round
@factsnotfeelings49016 жыл бұрын
u realize this is to kill birds or clay?
@Gottaculat4 жыл бұрын
When you make the "shotgun of tomorrow," but it's California compliant before that's even a thing.
@mustafaamin95164 жыл бұрын
Goattacular Truly ahead of its time
@klonoa4504 жыл бұрын
God i hate my state for that shit
@MussaKZN4 жыл бұрын
Red Engineer LOL even in Australia I can pick it up the same day if I’m early enough and that’s registered!!! HAHA that’s awesome!!!
@TeemoQuinton4 жыл бұрын
@@klonoa450 As you should. Vote better
@TheUltimateWord4 жыл бұрын
@@MussaKZN I live in Arizona, we can ask in with money, walk out with a gun and ammo. And we don't have to register shit, not even handguns. I love AZ
@Jacob-yg7lz6 жыл бұрын
"Oh I have an idea! Let's make a gun with a complexity of an automatic and the capacity of a double barrel!"
@bob445566DE6 жыл бұрын
Like the Beretta UGB 25
@scottdpugnificent5 жыл бұрын
The full auto slam fire single shot terminator is probably worse.
@lyokianhitchhiker5 жыл бұрын
Again: combat coach gun is not a good idea.
@adventure950044 жыл бұрын
Don't forget Most states have a 3 round limit for a hunting shotgun and lot of shotguns come with a plastic rod to limit the amount of cartridges you can get in the tube specifically for hunting, I'm sure this was part of the thought process designing this not as a combat shotgun.
@roryross38784 жыл бұрын
@@adventure95004 Sure, but there's no 3rd round.
@Mockturtlesoup16 жыл бұрын
"Never needs cleaning!" damn you armalite. fool me once...
@BType13X25 жыл бұрын
I heard that a bunch of young men in south east asia in the late '60s were told the same thing.
@superBAkid5 жыл бұрын
BType13X2 *rolling stones starts playing*
@TheCaptainSplatter5 жыл бұрын
@@BType13X2 beat me to it.
@HunterHerbst5 жыл бұрын
Ha, more like **CCR starts playing**
@davidkerr43745 жыл бұрын
@@BType13X2 From what I heard it was to do with the ammo it used at the time. During my days in the territorial's. I could train and use the M16a2 or the FN50 slr. The 16 would jam. Never had a problem with the slr.
"Never needs cleaning!" Yeah, because no one ever bothered to put more than 50 rounds through it.
@alperakyuz97024 жыл бұрын
Oof
@abdinboni22464 жыл бұрын
@g % fax
@johnsonp.4 жыл бұрын
g % would still build up schmoo from firing
@readcrafter82884 жыл бұрын
@@johnsonp. AVE or just Canadian?
@johnsonp.4 жыл бұрын
Read crafter AVE
@overlorddante4 жыл бұрын
That's just a double barrel shotgun with extra steps
@cmonkey634 жыл бұрын
Rick Sanchez agrees
@CarMad97ci4 жыл бұрын
Hahahahaha
@guypierson57544 жыл бұрын
Scrolled down to write this exact thing. Nice one :D
@overlorddante4 жыл бұрын
@@cmonkey63 ✊ my man
@JohnSmith-xv2ob4 жыл бұрын
Exactly what I was thinking... Why not just make a double barrel???
@bionmccool4 жыл бұрын
"Engravings give you no tactical advantage whatsoever"
@raycearcher57944 жыл бұрын
You FEEL awesome though. It's psychological.
@blokemelon2774 жыл бұрын
Rayce Archer its a metal gear reference
@therunningidiot4 жыл бұрын
Unless you're planning to auction it off... HEY, wait a minute!
@captainbodyshot28394 жыл бұрын
Pretty good
@InvidiousIgnoramus4 жыл бұрын
It's a nice gun, I'll give you that.
@cherrypepsi28154 жыл бұрын
"What gun do you own" "An ar17" "An ar15...?" "No"
@cherrypepsi28153 жыл бұрын
@Die Kista sorry lol
3 жыл бұрын
@Die Kista I dont care
3 жыл бұрын
@Die Kista not talking to you.
@5398-x8y3 жыл бұрын
Both y'all stfu I'm trying to watch TV.
@cherrypepsi28153 жыл бұрын
@@5398-x8y Lmao just turn off notifications or make it not vibrate lmao
@jamesb34974 жыл бұрын
I had two thoughts upon rewatching this: 1. How securely is that second round held in place? It looks like it could shake loose during an active hunt. 2. There's nothing protecting that loading port from mud and dirt. Not a great feature for a gun marketed at waterfowl hunters.
@aurin_komak4 жыл бұрын
nEvEr nEeDs cLeAniNg!
@jimjambananaslam35964 жыл бұрын
The mud and dirt is what holds the second round in. Duh.
@overlorddante4 жыл бұрын
@@jimjambananaslam3596 that's why you never need to clean it, mud is a vital component.
@beartankoperator79504 жыл бұрын
@@overlorddante its a feature
@kentlindal54225 жыл бұрын
"Light" and "Shotgun" should never be used in the same sentence
@alphagt623 жыл бұрын
My uncle had a Remington 1100 shotgun with the fiberglass barrel. It was awesome! It actually had a thin steel sleeve in the fiberglass barrel, but I could shoot skeet better with that gun than my own! I’d give plenty to have that gun, my cousin lost it through some in-law family matters. I don’t know if it was as light as this AR shotgun? But it was light for a semi-auto shotgun.
@evoxis10583 жыл бұрын
"To safely shoot a shotgun, or any gun, you need light." Boom
@IntrepidComic6 жыл бұрын
The sound of the bolt on the receiver makes my teeth itch
@Zellonous4 жыл бұрын
Glad I'm not the only one who found it cringey
@wawazaza17854 жыл бұрын
I actually liked it
@johnleyva46194 жыл бұрын
It sounded fine to me
@zoroarka99694 жыл бұрын
The fact that teeth can itch terrifies me
@TomFromYoutube4 жыл бұрын
It ain't the sound that does it. It's the drugs.
@arandomperson54344 жыл бұрын
"Never needs cleaning" That's what they said to the M16 rifle.
@dianelee21003 жыл бұрын
Try not cleaning a M16 ? YOU'LL BE STANDING THERE THROWING ROCKS AT YOUR ADVANCING ENEMY. LOL. SEMPER FI
@marc-andreservant2013 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile the enemy has a sand-incrusted, mud covered AK and is punching 10 holes per second through you.
@johanrunfeldt71742 жыл бұрын
@@marc-andreservant201 That's a gun that never - well seldom, but you're not going to live that long in a combat environment - needs cleaning.
@NORTH_CAROLINA_REAPER2 жыл бұрын
No, it malfunctioned because it had a change in powder that caused fowling.
@arandomperson54342 жыл бұрын
@@NORTH_CAROLINA_REAPER they also said that the original M16 was “self cleaning”
@andrewhilton98896 жыл бұрын
The man in the ad at 2:34 is actor Robert Stack, famous for his appearance in the film Airplane!, and many others. At one time he was shotgunning champion of the United States. This is a very rare though deeply flawed gun, thank you for showing it to us.
@Stoner075C6 жыл бұрын
I shoulda read this before commenting, but my doubt is solved. Txs!!!
@robertkubrick37385 жыл бұрын
Guess you never heard of the Untouchables?
@Miles-Vincent4 жыл бұрын
I thought that was him! Unsolved mysteries was the shiznit!!!
@154Kilroy6 жыл бұрын
Almost like this this gun was tailor made to be viewed on Forgotten Weapons... Lol.
@karakas99055 жыл бұрын
They played the long game with this one.
@joshuacallahan5704 жыл бұрын
no wonder its a forgotten weapon lol two shots in a semi auto wtf is the point
@Gottaculat4 жыл бұрын
This is the perfect gun for a Fudd who's a little semi-auto curious, but still needs his inferior shell capacity 'cause positive change frightens his feeble mind.
@The_Ballo4 жыл бұрын
So...Joe Biden?
@joeysoxjr.62684 жыл бұрын
@@The_Ballo Lol
@Superabound24 жыл бұрын
Joe "Two Blasts" Biden
@falloutghoul14 жыл бұрын
@@Superabound2 All he needs is two.
@Ghost514923 жыл бұрын
Guys dont forget the first "shotgun blast" needs to be fired in the air as a warning.
@arbhall75726 жыл бұрын
No One Ever: I was kinda looking for an over priced automatic shotgun that 70 year old double barrel shotguns will laugh at. Armalite design team: Hold my beer.
@kaiza91846 жыл бұрын
Arbhall McDougall Hold my LIKE ! 😲
@Golde2Good6 жыл бұрын
the sound of aluminum scraping against eachother. uuugh...
@Howdy7624 жыл бұрын
same i had to stop cause of that
@foxxy462134 жыл бұрын
it sounds like the gat gun I had as a kid...you kno the one where you press the barrel on the ground to cock it an unscrew a pin at the back to put pellets in....loved my gat
@Proseless4 жыл бұрын
needs *oil*
@scorpiosystem80823 жыл бұрын
At first glance I thought "This looks like a toy." Then Ian began actually loading the thing and I thought "This IS a toy!"
@Eduardo_Espinoza Жыл бұрын
Might feel like a toy too lol
@Grayfox9886 жыл бұрын
The nail-on-chalkboard sound the bolt carrier sliding on aluminum makes is excruciating.
@patricknapier14606 жыл бұрын
It reminds me of the sound when people bite their silverware
@skullhammer98996 жыл бұрын
Will kill it's target if the pellets don't
@amazinghuppifluppi3594 жыл бұрын
Read your comment even before the sound comes in the video. Got so triggered, I even felt it in my teeth. This fragging sound of hell. Triggered me so much, I answer a 2 years old comment. Aaargh.
@99Racker3 жыл бұрын
I used to hunt with a friend, a coworker in the 70s and used his AR17 a few times. He was pretty fast at loading a third round. But I recognized a two found shortcoming like an over/under or double (I think a double may be a bit faster). Lighter but recoiled more than my 870. I was issued a M16 in VN so I was used to weapons designed by the company. Thanks for the video.
@ThunderChunky1016 жыл бұрын
"Never needs cleaning" Because MAGIC!
@spacetrainbaby37374 жыл бұрын
It doesnt need cleaning because no one would ever use this
@chipsterb49464 жыл бұрын
“Finicky” is not a desirable characteristic in a firearm.
@philipbohi9833 жыл бұрын
Except for Hi-Point, where it would be a dramatic improvement, from “unpredictable”.
@daleford86213 жыл бұрын
@@philipbohi983 eh, they're ok for about 500 rds or so, then they get pretty temperamental. But for less than $200 that's not so bad. Then you can always just beat your assailant to death with the poly brick lol.
@mchagnon73 жыл бұрын
Especially if you have to mess with that finnicky system twice as often as everyone else reloads.
@ishfi45896 жыл бұрын
Just an observation, but it almost looks like the AR-17 was going to take detachable box magazines, but was chucked at the last minute.
@ostiariusalpha6 жыл бұрын
You are correct in that assessment.
@lsswappedcessna6 жыл бұрын
I wonder if some Colin Furze of guns out there could reverse engineer it to take magazines like it was meant to.
@kaiserwigglesiii23696 жыл бұрын
I was looking through the comments for a "it can actually take a mag" comment, but didn't find one. I'll look it up
@visionist75 жыл бұрын
Nice 4 round mag plus one in the chamber
@jamesmonroe15385 жыл бұрын
@@ostiariusalpha Can you provide any link to some information on that?
@Christopher2246 жыл бұрын
A semi-automatic shotgun that has no magazine tube and relies on what is essentially ghost-loading to hold a second cartridge. All that to save 3lb on a Browning Auto-5.
@aspenfacer-valentine43976 жыл бұрын
You say that as if 3lbs isn't a significant amount of weight to shave... But yes it was overly complicated and needed more than 2 rounds to be viable. Perhaps the most-needed improvement was a way to control recoil better. If you've ever fired a light weight shotgun (Like an old single shot slug gun, probably the only gun I wouldn't regret selling) you'd know why the wood and steel models are still popular
@clothar236 жыл бұрын
Meh 3 lbs is not a whole lot, the Timberwolf I carry weighs 17lbs and I have no issues carrying it around all day. And I am not even that big of a guy. I never understood this lightweight cult some shooters belong to.
@chrismorse38626 жыл бұрын
+clothar23 guess you aren't that good at math, 3 lbs would not be a huge difference off of 17# but imagine if you shaved 10+ off of yours, I imagine you'd not only notice the difference, but it would make the performance significantly different than what you are used to
@samuraijack19966 жыл бұрын
John Browning was a smarter man
@kevinsullivan34486 жыл бұрын
Chris Morse That depends on what you are using your shotgun for. If all you do is trap, then you have no understanding of how a shotgun is really used.
@TheAlmostbob6 жыл бұрын
Kinda amazing how far we've come in Shotgun tech since then. My Benelli Ethos weighs 7lbs, has room for 5+1 12 gague 2-3/4in shells, is recoil operated, and kicks like a 20 gague.
@ooloncaluphid6 жыл бұрын
My father has a Noble 20 gauge pump shotgun that's all aluminum except for a couple of springs and I would imagine the firing pin. They were made for a company that made aircraft aluminum, just to be given away to people as demonstrations of the strength of the aluminum. It weighs about 3 1/2 pounds. I've never shot it but my father says heavy loads will bring tears to your eyes.
@Bill2Board5 жыл бұрын
Tears of joy I hope?
@zevo93145 жыл бұрын
a heavy load can often bring tears to your eyes
@missano38565 жыл бұрын
I have a Ithaca 37 with an aluminum receiver and a hollow English style buttstock (which broke), 4.5 lbs even in 20 gauge it's not a nice shooting gun. It feels very "whippystabbypointy " rather than smooth swinging and kicks like a mule.
@toddpfennig19745 жыл бұрын
Had a Ithaca XL300 20 Gauge weighed 6.75 pounds. Perrrrrrrfect!!!
@wizardofahhhs7594 жыл бұрын
I don't see the big deal as far as weight is concerned. I have a Benelli M2 that's mostly plastic and aluminum that only weighs around 6.5 lbs and chambered for 3" shells and I'm not recoil sensitive with any load, being thin and only weighing 150 lbs.
@OlOleander6 жыл бұрын
Oof. That aluminum-and-spring squeak just gets right into your soul, doesn't it?
@marks_sparks16 жыл бұрын
Needs no cleaning - Armalite An unsinkable ship - White Star Line 🤔
@jameshealy45946 жыл бұрын
Truth in advertising - Nobody ever
@marks_sparks16 жыл бұрын
James Healy "In advertising there's no such things as lies - just expedient exaggerations" Roger O. Thornhill (Cary Grant), North by Northwest
@jameshealy45946 жыл бұрын
Nice quote, calling a ship "Unsinkable" is certainly quite the exaggeration! "Advertising is legalized lying" - H. G. Wells
@ThZuao5 жыл бұрын
The Olympic literally had a warship designed to ram other ships crash into it's stern section and it kept afloat. That hapened while Titanic was still on the warf. The "Unsinkable" bit was how Olympic was hailed by the Press, not White Star Line, but they did cashed in on the free publicity. Who wouldn't? Since Titanic and Brittanic were pretty much the same design, the fame carried over. Everyone knows what happened to Titanic, but Brittanic struck a mine during WWI and sunk because people opened the portholes and water poured in through otherwise watertight compartments. If it wasn't for that, the ship could have survived the breached compartments and the bulkhead doors that stuck open. The original "Unsinkable" Olympic went ahead to serve until the Great Depression made it unprofitable to operate, then it was sold for scrap in 1935. During that time, it earned the nickname "Old Reliable" in WWI after ramming and sinking a german U-boat. During the dismantling of the hull, the dent of a torpedo that failed to detonate was discovered.
@TruthNerds5 жыл бұрын
@@ThZuao Interesting stories from you and Greg Gallacci. I was thinking of the "unbreakable" Enigma machine, by the way, and it is believed that the plugboard version, with proper operating procedures, would actually not have been breakable, at least with the technology available to the Allies. So, same difference… a good technology used wrongly with disastrous results.
@HK_5414 жыл бұрын
"you see is it's called the ar 17 because it fits 17 rounds in its tube"
@robsciuk7294 жыл бұрын
You mean it has one of those deadly '30 magazine clips' ? Oooooh ... scary !!
@tomf41224 жыл бұрын
it has a fully semi auto high capacity assault rifle magazine
@Journey_to_who_knows4 жыл бұрын
Well that would give you a workout
@jacobiwolf773 жыл бұрын
@@Journey_to_who_knows look up the KSG 25 if you think that's heavy
@flamee233123 жыл бұрын
Prank’d
@theratlord9145 жыл бұрын
The heaviest part of this shotgun is the ammunition!
@josephdillard99076 жыл бұрын
Man that'sa gorgeous shotgun, I want it Just saw the reloading procedure, now I don't want it 😂😂😂
@hanelyp15 жыл бұрын
They could have done that a lot better. Like, open a spring loaded hatch, drop in a shell, and it's ready for the shell to be chambered.
@Dovah225 жыл бұрын
Joseph Dillard its more of a gun case shotgun to apreciate in value.
@FlutterGuy1216 жыл бұрын
When the shotgun of the future has the same capacity as the shotgun of the 1870s, you know there is a problem.
@611_hornet56 жыл бұрын
"Transparent aluminum?!" "Aye. That's the ticket lad..."
@matohibiki6 жыл бұрын
Wait, you can't just give him the formula like that.
@611_hornet56 жыл бұрын
"Why? How do we know he didn't invent the thing?"
@tikkidaddy5 жыл бұрын
@@611_hornet5 Well its obvious these guys didnt😃have the ticket...
@TheBigern224 жыл бұрын
Hello computer
@morganrobinson80424 жыл бұрын
Actually, we have that now.
@JW--dc8ri3 жыл бұрын
"Never needs cleaning!" Props to the marketing department 😂
@Radioactiveafikomen6 жыл бұрын
"The idea of having a fancy gold-colored gun really was an interesting and novel thing." So basically, it was the gold-colored iPhone of guns?
@ThePandoraGuy6 жыл бұрын
Yupp.
@lsswappedcessna6 жыл бұрын
Yeah, looks nice, but has German car levels of overengineering and in the end is only capable of two useful things, those being how many times it can shoot without being reloaded. A double-barrel shotgun is easier. and can do the same thing. They're quicker to reload, too.
@visionist75 жыл бұрын
But back then, only 1200 folks were fooled, unlike Apple's armies of fidels
@TruthNerds5 жыл бұрын
Funny, but most people agree that the iPhone is a good phone, except for the price. The action on this thing, on the other hand, looks rather goofy. I guess it was originally designed to be used with a detachable box magazine but regulations killed that idea. I may be wrong…
@iggysfriend44313 жыл бұрын
A whole 2 round capacity, with a loading time that takes longer than a standard shotgun.
@phille76696 жыл бұрын
The add at 2:32 never needs cleaning that worked out for the m16
@clothar236 жыл бұрын
The M16 ran just fine on decent ammo . Ya use the welfare crap the US Army was in the early stages of Vietnam sure there is going to be problems. But ya can say that about every firearm ever made mate. The M16's has overblown service and maintenance issues, perturbed by useless Soviet fanboys.
@phille76696 жыл бұрын
Every gun needs to be cleaned and they were advertising it never needs cleaning, WHY SO SERIOUS?
@williestyle354 жыл бұрын
I would not put that on Armalite. They never said the AR - 15 did not need cleaning. Neither did Colt when the got the rights to manufacture the M16. m.kzbin.info/www/bejne/gqq7n5d5rdNsgZY
@hk_40146 жыл бұрын
"Never needs cleaning!" Yeah just like how the m16 never needed cleaning.
@JerryEricsson5 жыл бұрын
I got out of the Army in 1978, after 8 years service, and even now, some 40 years later, I think I could still take down an M-16 and clean it so well my Drill Sergeant would pass it on his first white glove inspection!
@AveryBlueRemix5 жыл бұрын
Jerry Ericsson I can flip a pancake pretty well...
@karlt82335 жыл бұрын
When the M16 first went to Vietnam for combat trials they did not ship with a cleaning kit because during the testing phase stateside it was ran for x-thousands of rounds without cleaning, so they assumed it would perform the same way under combat trials. Before the combat trials were complete they rushed cleaning kits to Vietnam along with comic strip training manuals on how to properly clean the M16. Two things caused issues in Vietnam. 1st was powder type being used in the original 5.56mm loads but that took a little while to "fix". 2nd was the environment being used in, close tolerance guns do not fare well in jungle environments and when combined with excessively dirty ammo powders the failure rate was pretty high.
@jefflemaster28505 жыл бұрын
@Karl T I believe that the originals also specs called for chrome linings in the bore and bolt carrier. The Administration at the time thought it was too costly and cut that from some early production guns.
@nickhowatson47455 жыл бұрын
Karl T it was a myth that soldiers were told the m-16 didn’t need to be cleaned. It was probably a rumor started by the troops. Cleaning kits were issued but usually lost.
@yognaut5136 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video, Ian. I always figure there’s nothing else that could intrigue me in the firearms world but you always find something unique.
@thatphotographerjoe6 жыл бұрын
Holy crap costa mesa? That's my home town. Nothing ever comes out of costa mesa so that's a pretty neat little detail.
@dianelee21003 жыл бұрын
I love your videos. Can't believe I have been a gun lover for years and how little I really knew about them. I was given a mint 1929 L.C. Smith trap single shot 12 gauge specialty grade Damascus steel first auto ejector gun. It cost twice the as much as a car in the time. America has made so beautiful weapons. Keep it up
@445supermag6 жыл бұрын
And according to that magazine cover at 2:31, it never needs cleaning. Just like the AR15 never needs cleaning.
@Terror187D4 жыл бұрын
"Never needs cleaning" on the advert kills me
@none-ya-dam8216 жыл бұрын
Only 2 rounds??? Must have been made in California.
@xavierparis96056 жыл бұрын
yeah it says that in the video
@none-ya-dam8216 жыл бұрын
TheReal Shaqzilla that shotgun was ahead of it's time. Its perfect for California gun laws now.
@praetorxian6 жыл бұрын
Still too much of a WMD for Commiefornia. Please turn in to your local comissar.
@samuelmarmolejo43786 жыл бұрын
Paul None Ya its actually made in Costa mesa California
@none-ya-dam8216 жыл бұрын
samuel marmolejo I watched again and saw that.. thanks.
@RiskyBRiskyB3 жыл бұрын
"So 3.25 shells are the standard ammunition." "Hmm. I think just under 5 pounds would be the optimal weight, oh and they should all have aluminum barrels too."
@JBowles6 жыл бұрын
The furniture is polycarbonate(could maybe be acrylic but PC is much more likely), and there is no foam in the buttstock, they can break like the shell of an egg. This particular example is odd in that the woodgrain decal/coating on the furniture has degraded a lot compared to the overall wear on the gun. My AR-17 has been used quite a bit but the woodgrain is in much better condition. Armalite also made a few hundred of the AR-17s with black anodized parts rather than the gold. They also shipped with 3 different chokes, the medium choke appears to be the one installed. Legend has it the AR-17 was a parting pet project for Stoner before leaving to Cadillac Gage, basically the production manifestation of the earlier AR-9 semi-auto shotgun which appears to be practically the same aside from a muzzle brake/choke combo feature on the barrel.
@JBowles6 жыл бұрын
It's a shot gun barrel wear isnt that big of a deal, lead is still way softer than anodized 7075 alumnium
@mattorama6 жыл бұрын
The gun of the future, with a two round capacity. Even though back in 1897, Winchester could sell you a... Winchester 1897, with a six round capacity.
@robertkubrick37385 жыл бұрын
Please! 1893
@the_burger5 жыл бұрын
1887
@tristanwolske8201 Жыл бұрын
This is by far one of my top favorite videos of all time of this channel for some reason. This gun and it’s history is so appreciatively toy gunnish, futurish, crazy!!👍👍👍👍
@ostiariusalpha6 жыл бұрын
Ian didn't mention this, but the AR-17 receiver, BCG, and recoil system are based almost directly on Eugene Stoner's first conception of the AR-10. In fact, you can check it out right in the illustrative art for the direct impingement patent that ArmaLite sold to Colt (US2951424), it surprisingly is not the AR-10/AR-15 layout that you would expect to see. From the details of the 1957 ArmaLite action plan, they would have produced a semi-automatic, direct-impingement shotgun under the model designation AR-9 (and a sporter rifle with the same layout to be called the AR-14). But since the patent was sold to Colt, the DI gas system was no longer available to ArmaLite, and so they used this more conventional short recoil operation to create the AR-17. You can also see in the unusual 2-shot feed system, the remnant of the detachable box magazine that would slot into that area. Perhaps if the AR-17 had been more of a commercial success, they would have introduced a higher capacity magazine model.
@ProjectOBC4 жыл бұрын
This guy and The Report of the Week... Different animal same beast.
@alexbarnett85415 жыл бұрын
Those who forget the future are doomed to repeat it.
@jan-olofharnvall87604 жыл бұрын
A gem for collectors and tru al it’s shortcomings aesthetically pleasing.
@armedpartisan6 жыл бұрын
The Winchester Model 50, an excellent shotgun, also had two round capacity. It was the most expensive American produced shotgun of its day, however. Plenty were sold, but you don't see them too often. I find it disturbing that so many people on here do not understand what shotguns are used for traditionally. Legally in most places, you're not allowed to have more than three rounds capacity in any type of shotgun when used for hunting. Therefore, if your purpose is exclusively for trap, skeet, Sporting Clays, and hunting, having additional capacity is merely additional weight, and on the wrong side of the gun no less.
@classifiedad16 жыл бұрын
Basically.
@RyeOnHam6 жыл бұрын
The Winchester Model 50 has a THREE round capacity. Two in the magazine tube and one in the chamber. The Armalite has a TWO round capacity total. One in the chamber and one "ghost" loaded on the lifter. I've owned both. Still have the Winchester. It's a range gun only now but it's got decades of honest wear on it.
@minuteman41996 жыл бұрын
And that is why I love doubles. Especially English side by sides. The most fun you will ever have in shooting sports is sporting clays with an English double.
@uncleblazzer4205 жыл бұрын
I have a model 50 and it has a 3 round capacity just like all other model 12s. Also, you don't know as much as you think about shotgun hunting. The only type of hunting that limits you to 3 shells is migratory bird hunting and that is nationwide. Ducks, geese and doves are just about the only ones. That means that you can use more than 3 rounds when hunting for almost anything with a shotgun
@pietrotacconelli83116 жыл бұрын
Marketing wank: IT WEIGHS 5 LBS Me: it holds 2 shells....
@Shaun_Jones4 жыл бұрын
Honestly, 5lbs for a 12 gauge is a downside, there’s nothing there to eat up that recoil.
@chickenman18014 жыл бұрын
You could tie two pipes together for the same capacity and weight
@The1stLumiens10 ай бұрын
Held one in my hands today. It was beautiful!
@ahmetemreyilmaz5 жыл бұрын
Sounds like an full-auto assault rifle Looks like a semi-auto shotgun Holds two shells like a double-barreled shotgun An interesting gun for sure!
@garretphegley87964 жыл бұрын
It's not a rifle though?
@EE-ie1bo4 жыл бұрын
The name is that of a full auto rifle?
@ArcturusOTE3 жыл бұрын
@@EE-ie1bo the AR name
@SpartanD636 жыл бұрын
Actually a decently attractive looking gun, if not all that well thought out. I figured recoil would be a bit brutal just hearing that it was aluminum. But all even going so far as to go with plastic furniture... that's a bit silly. That said, the mechanical side is a bit interesting. I haven't ever seen a bolt that complex on a shotgun.
@clothar236 жыл бұрын
There is reason for that, a shotgun does not need that sort of complexity in it's bolt . Ya not popping heads at over a 1000+ meters ya hitting clay and birds at maybe 100 meters top. Ironically shaving a few locking lugs off would have made the damn thing lighter and helped the claim to lightest shotgun.
@SpartanD636 жыл бұрын
Oh yeah. A fascinatingly misguided design decision for sure.
@clothar236 жыл бұрын
And this from the company that gave us the AR-15.
@Palmtop_User4 жыл бұрын
That ribbed rod in the hand guard just brought me back to robotics. They (or an item very much like it) were used as field pieces and sometimes structural bits. We called them churros
@troy94776 жыл бұрын
Interesting. I knew very little about these. I bet with a steel barrel and at least a short steel mag tube it would have balanced well. And recoiled less. Shoot for abt a 7 lb weight, which would still have been ground breaking back then. It sounds like the ArmaLite people didn't have a lot of shotgun shooting experience. If they had, they would have known that it needed to be heavier for the sake of swing characteristics and recoil. Still an intriguing design, well ahead of its time. Great video as always. Thank you
6 жыл бұрын
I'm hoping whoever buys this frequents my range, and someday I'm standing next to them, and they are awesome and say "hey, want to shoot it a couple times" and I say "Hell yeah buddy" lol
@TheRogueWolf6 жыл бұрын
Physics still runs the show in the World of Tomorrow.
@JohnLeePedimore6 жыл бұрын
The all aluminum structure would have made more sense for a survival rifle like the AR-7 which already has a plastic stock and aluminum receiver.But it could have been even lighter with an steel lined aluminum barrel.
@ianbyrd28536 жыл бұрын
Ever take a look at the Browning Double Auto? More specifically, the Twelvette sub-model? I think it was the first to use aluminum for a shotgun. My grandfather bought one in the late 50s and used it for hunting for decades. He passed it on to me and I've used it for both trap and skeet for years now.
@JustaMuteCat Жыл бұрын
Back when Ian uploaded this I had noticed it but by rewatching I can’t help but feel like the gun is just asking for someone to put it out of its misery, with how the action screams at you when you cycle it.
@maximilianvonspee93296 жыл бұрын
I think the worst part of this for me is the two shot capacity. As a trap shooter and hunter I tend to think that unless it has at least a four shell capacity something fancier than a classic double barrel is kind of irrelevant
@alexv63246 жыл бұрын
I can hear the theme to The Man with the Golden Gun playing. Whuh whah whuh.
@theghostkidltu28784 жыл бұрын
imagine if this had a magazine
@alphagt623 жыл бұрын
Exactly what I thought, it’s an AR design, with their bolt type, it’s almost as if it were made with a mag in mind?
@5398-x8y3 жыл бұрын
@@alphagt62 imagine if a double barrel had a mag
@Boojakascha6 жыл бұрын
can't wait for the po-tay-to po-tah-to discussion on aluminum =)
@cloudkitt6 жыл бұрын
It's spelled differently in North America
@Mike-gi1dk3 жыл бұрын
my stoeger m3000 had a rotating bolt as well. inertia driven system. man i miss that thing. so smooth
@TheTrooper1156 жыл бұрын
God that bolt makes a god awful noise when moving around.
@skurblord34016 жыл бұрын
Sounded like it hadn't been oiled since 1960. Also aluminum scraping makes a much higher pitched noise than steel often times.
@bobfish65066 жыл бұрын
Imagine the felt recoil on that shotgun
@waltlars36876 жыл бұрын
Bob Fish I fired one a couple of shots useing Winchester AA trap loads it kicked like 870 with High brass duck and goose loads
@bobfish65066 жыл бұрын
Walt Lars I hope your shoulder survived afther you shooting it
@waltlars36876 жыл бұрын
Bob Fish no worse than high powered duck and goose loads in a 870
@Adriethyl2 жыл бұрын
This is gonna throw off everyone who thinks AR stands for _Assault Rifle_
@newdefsys6 жыл бұрын
Advertisement at 2:34 says "never needs cleaning". Is this the source of the rumor that circulated through Army ranks that their new M16's were 'self cleaning' ?
@mrb6926 жыл бұрын
The original AR-15 was indeed self cleaning, because the original 5.56 round had a different powder formulation that was cleaner and had a different pressure curve. When the round was finalized, it was dirtier and lower pressure at the time the gas reached the bolt which led to the now infamous problems. Ian and Karl discussed this in one of their videos on the AR-15. I think it was the mud test, but I'm not sure.
@ostiariusalpha6 жыл бұрын
+Der Fliegende Holländer It was discarded because Remington lied their asses off about its performance consistency, and they were found out by the military ordnance board. Remington cherry-picked the lots of IMR 4475 propellant during the initial trials to meet the velocity requirements, but when Frankford Arsenal began testing larger production runs of the ammo, they got underpressure rounds, and even worse, rounds that would have dangerous pressure spikes. With the cat out of the bag, the military had to search for a different propellant that was more inherently consistent when produced in large scale. The most promising was the new WC 846 spherical powder created by Winchester Olin, it gave excellent velocity without the pressure spikes of IMR 4475, though it did have a higher gas port pressure that increase the cyclic rate somewhat. Unfortunately, for some stupid reason the Olin engineers allowed to much calcium carbonate (a stabilizer that keeps the propellant from aging and developing tendencies towards pressure spikes) in the formulation, and this increased calcium carbonate began to condense in the gas tube, leading to clogging from the build-up.
@HughesEnterprises6 жыл бұрын
For those of you wondering why this only holds two shells- Doubles trap was very popular in the 1960's and you only need two shells. This gun was a competitor to Browning's Twelvette (another two shot semi-auto).
@BadlanderOutsider6 жыл бұрын
This; you see a lot of dedicated guns for trap that might make one's head scratch especially when looking from them at a more generalist perspective but make perfect sense if you think that someone would be buying this gun for this sole purpose alone (and maybe bird hunting).
@chuckhotze91413 жыл бұрын
Movie Star ROBERT STACK on the Magazine Cover with the AR-17....was in fact a true champion in the world of breaking clay....back in "the day." Great to see him in your presentation since some might think he was just a male model...instead of a well known shotgunner of the day.
@ChimpFromSpace6 жыл бұрын
Oh god, the scratchy, screechy noise of the action hurts my brain!
@whyjay99596 жыл бұрын
Same here...
@ddselvig3 жыл бұрын
Would make a nice gun for light loads and small game. I remember reading about it back in the day, but was never able to afford one.
@TheArklyte6 жыл бұрын
Why haven't they used a detachable mag? Was it already outlawed? Why not add extra mass as optional handguard or barrel extension? The gun basically failed because it wasn't futuristic _enough,_ not because it was trying to be futuristic.
@TheDreamer9056 жыл бұрын
This would be a cool shotgun, if it had a full sized tube magazine or even a box magazine, instead of just two shells
@donaldoehl7690 Жыл бұрын
"May not have taken everything into consideration..." Wow, that has never happened before ever!
@AlexS94036 жыл бұрын
5 or 10 round box magazines might've been a better idea.
@carltalbot92126 жыл бұрын
That shotgun probably would have had some success if Armalite would have used a 5 round feed tube. Two rounds you use a coach gun or Over and Under. I have 1978 Franchi 5 round auto that is made of all aluminum except the barrel. When I purchased my Franchi I gave up a pound and one half for the engraved European walnut stock. It weighs a bit over 7 pounds. My 870 8 round weighs a lot more. I don't think Armalite understood the shotgun market at all
@allensanders42044 жыл бұрын
Already done by Browning in the 60's with their semi auto Twelvet , 2 rounds and came in colored receivers. Light weight, fast shooting .
@Dominik1896 жыл бұрын
that thing must kick like a mule x-x
@hughmarloweverest16846 жыл бұрын
I may have my butler bid on this one for me.
@A-Negative3 жыл бұрын
I like to say to my friends here in CA/Hollywood “ We can all agree no one needs an AR-17.” They all agree with vigor. “Cause who would ever need a two shot 5 pound aluminum shotgun made in 1964.”
@Abclyfestyle6 жыл бұрын
Can see why it wasn’t a popular shotgun.
@superBAkid5 жыл бұрын
“Never needs cleaning” that will never be a thing when you are using gun powder
@AlcerusOfficial4 жыл бұрын
I mean if your tolerances are shite enough...
@felipedaiber29914 жыл бұрын
But what if you use a theoretical compuand that is 33.3333333% oxigen and 66.66666666% carbon and also is 100% pure?
@Shade_Daemon4 жыл бұрын
Railguns FTW amirite?
@superBAkid4 жыл бұрын
felipe daiber yeah it’s possible but with normal gun powder unless you can somehow keep it all in the casing it will build up eventually. A self cleaning barrel would be cool but I don’t think we are close to that yet.
@jerrybobteasdale4 жыл бұрын
Kinda intersting seeing actor Robert Stack( Stryker in" Airplane!" the movie,) on that advert. He was a famously good skeet shooter. "was a champion skeet shooter in his youth, shooting on three California State Teams and was inducted in the Skeet Shooting Hall of Fame in 1971."... "At 16, Stack was a member of the All-American Skeet Rifle Team, setting two world records and becoming the National Skeet Champion. "
@ian-op5fv6 жыл бұрын
Oh boy! It holds just as much as a double barrel, it's harder to load and less reliable. With the added bonus of giving me whiplash every time I fire it. Where can I pick one up?
@Tallmios6 жыл бұрын
S P A C E M E T A L S
@BingleFlimp6 жыл бұрын
Question. If you put all this effort into a shotgun just to have it have a two-shot capacity what's the advantage of this design over a double barrel shotgun?
@andymac48836 жыл бұрын
I was wondering about that myself.
@edwardgrabinsky63696 жыл бұрын
having 2 barrels is more heavy
@ALegitimateYoutuber6 жыл бұрын
ya i was thinking the same thing, because a good double barrel i have a feeling wouldn't weigh much more and would be cheaper.
@Derkman966 жыл бұрын
A L U M I N U M
@vrisbrianm47206 жыл бұрын
I think the double barrels design would be more reliable, as compared to this AR-17
@revolverjones4 жыл бұрын
I mean everyone is dissing this gun for a good reason but I think this could go somewhere in the future
@SpaztallicA6 жыл бұрын
If they redesigned the entire look of the thing (more of a space age shape) it might have seemed cooler in hindsight. The plastic/aluminium combo with the 'faux fancy' basic engraving matched with the basic shotgun design, just leaves it looking.....incredibly cheap.
@wierdalien16 жыл бұрын
SpaztallicA now it does. Then it would look plain odd
@ZGryphon6 жыл бұрын
Welcome to 1964!
@philipcheng16186 жыл бұрын
Looks like something from Bioshock
@henrymach6 жыл бұрын
Why this weird loading system? Why not a regular pump action? What were they thinking?
@armedpartisan6 жыл бұрын
diamened, certain semi-auto actions actually use fewer Parts than many conventional pump actions. I have a Franchi model 48AL 12ga semi-auto, and it is remarkable in how few parts it has compared to my Mossberg 500, for example. This isn't always true, but action bars and other components like that would probably have added to the weight.
@jacobcozad50796 жыл бұрын
I think they originally intended to have a magazine
@jtoth19955 жыл бұрын
They were thinking of THE FUTURE!
@Xachremos4 жыл бұрын
@@jacobcozad5079 then why not follow through? In this state it seems like more of a novelty than a usable firearm.