Artist CLAIMS It's Not AI, Public Not So Convinced

What are your thoughts about this art piece, and some of the other pieces of this artist? Do you think they're legitimate, or is it traced off AI art?
Disclaimer: Please do NOT send hate to anyone mentioned in my videos. Everything that is said is alleged and there are always 2 sides to every story, and the truth.
▶ Check out my art and resources here:
kofi: ko-fi.com/katl...
etsy: www.etsy.com/s...
▶ Other socials:
twitch: / about
instagram: / katliente.ttv
twitter: / katlienteee
tiktok: / katliente
tags, ignore these!
twitch streamer, twitch streaming, growing on twitch, 0 viewers, twitch affiliate, streamer, twitch rivals, twitch drama, streaming setup, news, vtubers, digital art

[@Youmna.a]

The big thing is to remember that ARTISTS can sketch/draw like that but they always adjust and erase things, THAT Artist in the video did NOT do such things. Please support real artist

[@goingferalluvs]

Also- not an artist- isn't the sketch a little TOO detailed? It looks more like a copied coloring book page than anything. Like the detail on the horns, where the eyebags go-

[@Youmna.a]

@@goingferalluvs The hair is actually too detailed since most of the Artist don't sketch their hair like that, the other details (Clothing, horns) are completely normal (For me atleast, there could be other opinions)

[@goingferalluvs]

@YunYunShorts okay I don't know how horns and such but the hair? Yeah even with my short art history I don't ever remember any tutorial putting detail into the hair during sketching.

[@Youmna.a]

@@goingferalluvs There are artstyles and in some artstyles artist draw some Hair strands in their sketches but not TOO detailed. This artist drew the hair as if they were a beginner (Beginner mostly draw every strand of hair) but that artist can also render good and that is very suspicious

[@kelly8361]

was gonna comment this! yes! no thumbnails, no erasing, no movements/adjustments, no swatching/changing colors. This artist is better than the fundamental masters put them in a museum!

[@persephonehades7547]

Oh hell nah. They outted themselves fully when they said they'll take the "it looks AI" comments as compliments. It is not a compliment if your work as a legitimate artist is compared to AI. AI art makes so many mistakes, looks so generic, steals so many other peoples' art, etc that it's an insult if you worked hard on something and it ends up being called AI. Only people who mess around with AI art thinks it looks good.

[@sexygirlmax2019]

Yep. Cus I see artists where their art is absolutely being used to train AI and they're very upset about it being compared to AI art

[@krystami5789]

Yeah, I feel uncomfortable with the idea of anyone thinking my art is

[@Pipkiablo]

Agreed. I've seen actual artists falsely accused of using AI by people who think all good art is AI (and I know for sure they aren't using AI because I'd been following them long before it was a thing and their style has remained consistent and many of them will post frequent WIP that look like what you'd expect from a real artist). It really hurt those artists to be accused of using AI when they drew everything themselves. Some of them got angry. Not a single person thought comparing their artwork to AI was a compliment.

[@krystami5789]

@Pipkiablo indeed, heavily resonate with this comment.

[@SobrietyandSolace]

when people say ‘oh my god that’s unreal, did you do that with AI? You PAINTED that?!’ I have such mixed feelings

[@Shippou011]

She was just caught claiming a Michael Zavros painting was an "original" piece by her in a traditional media (and subsequently shut down her insta lol), so I think we can all surmise just how truthful she's being about this not being AI, lol.

[@katnchat]

oop-

[@KwehShiro]

LOL, well, her silence speaks volume , she shot heself in the foot XD

[@nerixh2090]

@@katnchathello I’ve been watching u for a long time there was this girl called tutkiwi and I called her out and ending up getting a lot of hate

[@mr.spl00sh]

​@@nerixh2090What did she do?

[@SaphirePhoenix5000]

​@katliente Honestly I think she's showing the video in reverse.. meaning she's using the eraser tool to remove colour! And playing it In reverse gives the appearance that she's drawing it herself. For instance, she could have ran the image through a tool/software that separates colour sections into their own layers. Making it pretty easy to do the eraser reverse effect.

[@cc_the_rebel]

I think sis got that mythical rendering brush that can produce hella colors at once (iykyk)

[@Aiedaeil]

Luckyyy I need that brush 🤩😍

[@FoxGameCZ]

and she isn't even gonna share the multi colour magic brush :(((((

[@Aiedaeil]

@@FoxGameCZ ikr 😭😭😭😭

[@Faesharlyn]

The eraser shaped one? You can see shes using the eraser at 6:19 if you pause

[@TigerVids531]

​@@Faesharlyn you don't need to expose her like that 😭

[@hachi_beep]

With the "sketch proof" there's something in procreate called private photos, where you can put an image in the procreate canvas and it won't show up on the recordings, they probably did that for the speedsketch, putting the ai art and tracing/sketching over it Edit: when I mean recording I mean that procreate makes a recording out of your progress and turns it into a speed paint and that's what this "artist" is showing off.

[@Wallflower6608]

That’s exactly what I thought happened too

[@KwehShiro]

omg, thatS' 100% what happened then, my other guess was ai shenanigans, a sketchify tool or they printed the ai generated picture nad putted on top of their ipad lol... didn't know that was a thing in procreate since i dont have it

[@mermadicamerican7754]

... it wont show up in videos? I assume you mean in videos created in procreate? Because the video of the drawing was taken from a separate device...

[@hanmira]

@@mermadicamerican7754yes the Timelapse in procreate!

[@hachi_beep]

​@@mermadicamerican7754 procreate makes video recordings of your progress and shows it off to you as a "speed paint".

[@moleyface]

To me, the needless lines in the sketches REEK of an edge extraction filter, which will outline any point of high contrast regardless of whether it makes sense or not. It's particularly obvious in the clown's ruffle, which no one would EVER detail to that degree in the sketch phase, but probably creates enough high contrast shadows for the filter to think it's important.

[@Beckle7924]

Yeah, like if I know I'm adding color I wouldn't go through the effort of sketching the shading/highlight color lines first

[@QUEERVEEART]

they cant even trace ai art traditionally lol why am i not surprised. they want to do zero work drawing but so much work being deceptive. what a wild world we live in

[@Leyawa]

It's so obvious - it hurts my eyes. Also: the type of "sketching" you can see they don't typically draw. Most people who are faking it sketch like that :,D

[@saitan2712]

Was gonna say this exactly. It's very easy to tell a sketch someone copied from a preexisting work from a sketch done as the first step to an original artwork.

[@pattyprolapse]

Dave and Busters' photobooth "sketch" filter

[@BoneBugg]

i mean, no initial guidelines or planning of ANY sort? and there are outlines of every little detail? not at ALL what even the most experienced artists' sketches look like. classic tracing.

[@RadiumDecay]

They could have at least chosen another style of ai art, the one they chose is genuinely the worst, for some reason it hurts my existence

[@whobitmyneck]

@@BoneBugg Some people don't have to plan

[@kalpea_varis]

The way she "sketches" and "renders" just screams "fake process". She's fulfilling all the stereotypes of how tracers/art thieves try and prove their work and it's honestly not surprising a lot of non-artist do not see why artists say she's tracing or erasing stuff to show the AI image underneath. In Procreate you can create "secret layers" that won't get recorded by the timelapse. Me personally for example, I use these for when I drag in a lot of references I don't want to clutter the canvas for the final speedpaint with, so I just put them onto the invisible layers. But this is also used by a lot of tracers that "draw" in Procreate to layer the image underneath and trace above, so it looks like they're magically creating intricate artwork.

[@caitlynxzane]

The main giveaway for me was that the back horn on the chibi elf girl was REALLY weird, because it comes out of the hood instead of the forehead like the other horn

[@Stratelier]

Hm, I don't see that. Judging by the video thumbnail, the far horn and hood do line up pretty tangent to each other, but I don't see any clear evidence of the horn going "through" the hood.

[@jjcymbolic]

I was hunting down this comment as I was about to make it.

[@jjcymbolic]

@@Stratelier The horn nearest to the us, the viewer, is in front of the hood. The other has the hood color between the hair and the horn, showing that it is going through the cloth.

[@Viistella]

This EXACTLY for me as an artist, I was staring at the piece and realized the horn was completely off

[@KwehShiro]

for me it was the entire shading + realism. the shading technique looks amateur while the rendering look extremely detailed and in the 'perfect' place. then the timelapse and everything else and the hood just gave it away. She can draw, she just chose to be lazy. like that one eye she did herself (before replacing it with the ai one after). she could do actual art... but no, lazyness and clout is more important than that i guess. She seem to have good observational skill, at least from the little we could see from the eye she did with reference from the ai pic... observational skill is important in visual art, honestly she should be ashamed for trying to cheat her way out when she could actually put effort and do it herself :l

[@Cyntaria]

16:50 there is a way she can colour pick then switch between pen and eraser without us knowing. She's using an apple pencil. Double tapping the flat part of the pencil will switch between eraser and pen/brush without any indication other than the current tool symbol on the toolbar changing. I use Procreate myself and always use that hotkey.

[@SobrietyandSolace]

Oh my god I never knew that. I have to use an Apple Pencil because no 3rd party stylus works on the iPad Pro 1st gen 😂

[@Feelin_Froggie]

Yep I use the double tap all the time - fun fact, it doesn’t have to be on the flat side. It works on all sides and I accidentally switch between them so often without realizing.

[@SpiderBerryExplorer]

I know this is AI, but something kat didn’t say about the layers is that when combining the layers the numbers aren’t in order, and the first layer gets mixed into 2 or 3. I do this, I combine all my sketching layers and then it becomes layer 3. The odd numbers in her art process makes sense when you think of it this way. BEAR IN MIND, I do think this is AI.

[@rainofstars5809]

im using photoshop and also merge layers to optimize my work file. so i also dont have layer 1, 2 ,3 ever ahah

[@hinatot]

might vary from program to program, but in the one i use (firealpaca), if i merge my layer 1 into layer 2, the next time i make a new layer it will name it layer 1. it will always name the new layer the lowest currently unused number

[@ST4RZY.AL13N]

@@hinatotsame for ibis

[@smolsupernova]

the sad thing to me is that if she put in the same amount of effort she puts into (allegedly) lying to people, she would actually be able to have legitimate improvements in her artwork- which however slow, would be much better than receiving attention for something you didn't do

[@comajuice]

I also ironically feel if you draw like this, youd actually have less layers. Since your 'paint' wont blend as well as if you were to paint onto the same layer Also generally most people dont draw every little tiny line for a sketch if theyre gonna paint the details well. Like someone wouldnt sketch every hair strand only to then paint the hair lol

[@Flutter_Aeina]

Yes!!! My more painterly styled work is on WAY fewer layers than my cell shaded stuff. I always merge the layers before I start blending or shading

[@Hermannco]

This is a good point. Cell shade can have 200 layers but my paintings end with 1 to 4

[@-touya_todoroki]

Yeah, it can get frustrating too, I personally to a vibe type so I put the fur in the directions of the fur or hair.

[@arec6345]

Wow what a great point. I didn't even think about that but I can't think of anyone else who draws such detailed sketches.

[@KosmiskRevolution]

So true! My comic style art: 32 layers. My extremely detailed down to the bloodvessels in the eyes digital portraits: 3 layers max lol

[@Baebaechu23]

0:22 off topic but you give more Alice in wonderland vibes tbh and i LOVE IT

[@Kattrina-catt]

Omg I see it! 😻

[@JohnClMeis]

First time watcher, took me a few seconds to notice she was not white lol. Addendum: Before she mentioned it. Does she think her hand, pen, etc. is fake?

[@KitchenShovel]

Also 7:47 when she’s showing the speed paint, she is hiding the brush/blender/eraser

[@MoistNasa]

Good look out I didn’t even notice. I use procreate and it would never occur to me to hide my brushes or layers?? That’s something you have to consciously decided to do.

[@ChampagneKanyon]

@@MoistNasawhenever I used to do digital id minimize the tabs at most they were almost always open. Yall got a good point on this one

[@ChampagneKanyon]

Minimize as in size wise not minimize the actual tab id just make it as small of a window as I could

[@nikitatavernitilitvynova]

I don't know if I got it right but you mean they hid the brush selection tools? Like where it shows which brush you're using and what type? I personally don't use procreate as I don't have an iPad myself. But for me for example if you look at my speed paints I've posted you can't see me change brush either for the most part not because I purposefully hid it but because I use the Microsoft game recording thingy to record my speedpaints and it somehow would only record the main screen as is and any tab I'd open like changing brush or something that wasn't in my recent brushes (I use Krita and have all of my side tabs open or else I can't draw anything) it wouldn't show. But it makes sense here. She probably doesn't want you to know she's not even switching brushes probably. Because even on my recordings it shows my floating cursor clicking and moving around the screen when I'm picking a new brush. Like you can tell I'm doing something you can't see. Which could also indicate me possibly switching brush to erase with aswell. I'm not denying that.

[@KitchenShovel]

@@nikitatavernitilitvynova there’s 4 buttons (the brush selection tools and layers) she either unintentionally hid from her recording or she just cut them out (which why??) also your art is soooo pretty

[@Tsunami._.Youtubz]

Since it was made in procreate, I think they used the private photo button to put the ai art and drew over it. Speedpaints not show the ref photo if it was a private photo. But the real footage is kinda weird🤔

[@MangaRaven2]

All the talking about the eyes & horns, but all the accessories are screaming the AI fails.. The head piece chain is going up into the horn, the hood is in front of the horn in the back, the necklace, the earring & all the weird dots on the forehead & nose.. Like wtf.. The hood at the front around the neck doesn't even match up with rach other.. & I can keep going..... Also the eyebrows hair is having it's own ways to go..

[@not_ur_mamas_mothman]

“I will take your accusations as compliments” and that’s the nail in the coffin for me, I don’t know a single artist who would take that as a compliment. I think that says everything you need to know.

[@SobrietyandSolace]

when people say ‘oh my god that’s unreal, did you do that with AI? You PAINTED that?!’ I have such mixed feelings. To people who can’t draw or paint, they think anything that looks difficult to render to them must be AI

[@felipe9187]

ehhh i mean i would take that as a compliment kind of, ive seen some really "good" ai images that look like they were drawn by a real person, so if people thought my drawings were ai i would kinda feel good? probably lol. but i get ur point

[@tarotsushima3332]

Having such a detailed first sketch should have been a dead giveaway. Unsurprised that people who don't bother to draw dunno that most sketches have periods of being modified, erased, lasso'ed, redrawn etc. I def think that the 'rendering' being done is actually just erasing. Never colourpicked or changed a brush during it too.

[@Birdsflight44]

As someone who has a history with pen and even ink painting, I don't think to use things like the eraser or lasso tool on sketch layers most of the time- just commit to the lines and roll with it. But those lines seem to lack the confidence that someone should have if they can draw without any guidelines, shapes or tweaks. Very sussy to me.

[@CosyKitty]

As a person who likes to use ballpoint pen only, you can still see me measuring out and putting dots in places I'm planning to draw something in, you can also see me "shifting" lines and hiding them in shadow when I make a mistake cuz I can't erase. I'd assume that if I used the same process digitally, I'd be shifting the "markers" to better suit the position I want instead of magically drawing everything in without any "markers" Edit: grammar

[@luancosta199]

​@@Birdsflight44 exactly. The lines have no weight difference and are very scratchy. The small details have the same weight as big parts, making it crowded. Most artists that have evolved past major changes during the sketching process have a lot more line confidence than this

[@Benreyholic]

What bothers me is that she drew the pupil details in the sketch 😭 people dont do that with semi realism paintings (digitally atleast). Its usually done in the rendering/painting stage not sketch because its pointless. Like, she literally drew in the highlights for a coloured painting

[@SquishyTheVampire]

Some people actually do make super detailed sketches. It's not super common but some people draw like that. (Not defending the ai person)

[@isae1783]

Whether this person is using ai or not, I still don’t get why ai artists don’t put this much effort to just learn how to draw and drawing themselves, like they could’ve spent those nine hours ACTUALLY drawing, and not pretending to draw this?? It’s just so weird.

[@Birdsflight44]

A lot of people never learn the difference between actually doing something and other people acknowledging that you did a thing. As long as it gets done, it doesn't matter, riiiight? Seriously though, this is a real phenomenon- people can actually convince themselves of these lies. Things like BPD can make people lose a grip on reality. When they think they deserve something, especially if they think they approximate that skill, then they'll cheat with few qualms. I'm not diagnosing, just pointing out that this kinda behavior is something humans actually seem quite predisposed to. We don't even have a good grio on reality in the first place until well into development as children. Being better than this is something a lot of people have to be taught. And that's okay- as long as they figure that shit out at a reasonable pace. You're responsible for that by adulthood though, ffs. Even mental illness isn't an excuse typically- Though people with cluster b conditions deserve some real grace when they are fighting their troubles. They're an at risk population who deserve compassion. But you can't set yourself on fire for the folks among them who can't acknowledge they have a problem.

[@tarabooartarmy3654]

Because a lot of people have technical skills but can’t draw squat from imagination. That was me for YEARS. I’ve just now gotten to the point where I feel I can draw from imagination. It’s hard to develop your own style if you can’t draw from imagination because you can’t stylize something you can’t imagine. So you just get stuck faithfully reproducing references.

[@asya-35987]

Cuz its hard

[@quiwing]

Problem is, a lot of these AI ‘artists’ are actually artists themselves and can draw just fine. It’s either content farming or ragebait.

[@LEE-kq9tq]

Bc they just want the praise for a piece they're not skilled enough to create. That's all it is. They want the praise

[@AriPlayzDTI]

I draw a "block by block", only because I use references for my art and I'm not someone who would lie about using references! I draw purely for fun, so I typically redraw my favorite scenes or characters from my favorite shows, so when I draw something that already has everything laid out, it looks like it's block by block. But even then, I still have to have a "sketch" phase where I draw the general forms/shapes (like the body, face, hair, etc.), and then I add the tiny details (line shading, eye details, etc.) later on because I learned that when I get a little too confident/comfortable without finishing the rest, the proportions end up wrong. 😭 So even if you sped up the videos where I use references (I should probably post them sometime!), you could still see where I erased and went back on my mistakes, sometimes continously before being content and moving on to complete the rest. So yeah, even for me, the way they "sketched" was incredibly weird too!

[@sunla]

The whole process is super sus. A sketch that looks like that shouldn't take an hour for an artist with that skill level. It looks like AI. Her sketch looks like she just traced an AI image. She has no idea how sketching works and it's so obvious, it's painful.

[@Stratelier]

This is an argument I can get behind: If you are copying directly from a pre-existing image (AI or otherwise) you CAN often put down more or less final lines on the first try with a minimum of corrections.

[@AlienZizi]

it was a bad sketch too. it wasnt precise enough to act as lineart to be followed exactly, but was missing all the important info a sketch would give, such as volume guides, simpler shapes as part of one more complex shape (like using circles to define cheekbones, the tip of the nose, chin, anything).

[@cheese7119]

10:10 the only time you see this is when realism artists draw from photos 1 to 1 which means that even if they drew that, it was a copy of an ai image

[@jewboo3118]

You know what pisses me off? If AI is so cool and awesome and futuristic and accessible, WHY TF ARE PPL PRETENDING TO BE A 'LOWLY' REGULAR ARTIST??? Don't pmo

[@maxnami]

Easy answer: To not being harassed by other people for using AI. I mean, even on X(Twitter) there are a lot of AI users uploading AI images and still people ask: It's AI? or say: "pick a pencil" or send hate because that account used AI eventhough the name would is "@ artist_AI" and in Bio say is using AI.

[@stonks3507]

@@maxnamiI’m sorry if this is insensitive, but maybe they just shouldn’t use AI art in general? People don’t deserve to get their art stolen, and lying about not doing it to not be harassed isn’t justification.

[@jonathanperreault4503]

because they are not , your are trying to "catch" and evil a.i bro in the act but shes just a regular artist, that why the anti a.i crowd is just a dangerous mob with pitchfork

[@Fifthtee55]

Artist skill is respected, while AI user don't, so it's like copium of what being an artist feel. Also why are they putting all the effort being fake artist while they can just use these effort in drawing and be real

[@an0nym0us_slash35]

Oh some aren't, I've seen some AI users saying that AI is much better and will replace normal artists so they're very proudly showing off that they use AI

[@GabbyBites]

What really gives it away for me is the jewelry on the head. It's obviously traced lines from a pre-rendered piece, where they don't quite understand what they're tracing so they're doing the lines wishy-washy, where the previously rendered piece had light and shadow parts with strong reflections, that the artist wouldn't be able to replicate without putting guide lines (that don't make sense), because they can't understand the lighting, shading, cast shadows, reflective nature of that part.

[@Novaurawr]

The fact that despite tech bros saying that ai is evolving to such heights no one will understand the difference anymore but public always knows what’s up gives me some hope.

[@RadiumDecay]

It isn’t really AI’s job to fool people with art, the scope of error for ai is unlike the errors made by humans. Ai is still not there yet, and the ai available to the general public is also not high quality. Ai is a tool, and must be used right

[@Novaurawr]

@@RadiumDecayis is true that if viewed as an useful tool meant to help artists, ai can indeed be pretty helpful but most companies view it as full replacement for humans.

[@RadiumDecay]

@ not true, these were the same words said during the Industrial Revolution. I work in the computer science field and contrary to popular opinion, our jobs are safe. AI cannot work independently, it needs a machine learning program, the ability to recognise algorithms can only come if it is fed with structured data. With unorganised data, the kind of ai can’t be used as a replacement at all. To manage ai, we need more jobs. Let’s assume we do use AI to write our codes, in that case we would still have the job. Creativity if coming from algorithms would be repetitive, so we would use it for the tedious codes. Then the program would let us select the outcome which we think is the best. There are various risks, but since ai is a relatively newer thing, I believe we can fix the current issues and use it as an effective tool for the future

[@Novaurawr]

@@RadiumDecay computer science coding jobs and jobs of creative skills like artists, animators, designers, writers etc are completely different with the way they go abt ai and the use of it. Let me remind you that js recently Coca Cola and Honda made some ads that were completely ai generated and pretty much everyone disliked it, normally, these ads would’ve taken people with creative jobs like directing to make. But since they were not used in the making of such ads due to them being completely ai generated those people with those jobs are at a risk. Several massive studios and corporations are starting to lay off animators and voice actors or writers etc or pay them less, there was writers strike and VAs strike recently for those too. Most companies (esp the tech bros there) don’t have much respect for talents so they think they’re replaceable thus end up getting ai to do the work instead for much cheaper so it can harm real people with creative jobs.

[@RadiumDecay]

@ computer science lies in the creative field too, why did u differentiate it? And yes, a lot of jobs like voice acting would be replaced by ai, and that would only happen when ai improves, which it eventually will. Now, ai cannot and should not be stopped, what do u suggest we do? Ai will take jobs no doubt, but will also create newer ones. If the process of this transition is slow, it would be better.

[@lenaislovely]

There's something that i noticed, but I'm not sure if you've mentioned it yet. But that elf girl's left horn literally came out of the hood, like it's connected somehow. But it's different from her right horn that is obviously in front of the hood. And not to mention the position of both horns are in different parts of her head. AI is the worst and people who use and claim it as their own art are fakers.

[@BurntGrilledChezze]

Tbh with your arm warmers with the bows. You’re giving off more of Alice in wonderland. 100% pretty outfit ✨👌

[@trinitym3633]

My first thought as well 🥹🖤

[@HoneylemonMelon]

Frr I wanna know where to get some cute arm warmers like that from 😭💕

[@kirahhdrop]

Once I saw this comment I thought Alice in wonderland without seeing your full comment! So you’re spot on! Ima go make a fully rendered fanart piece for this outfit in one minute now 🤡🤡🤡🤡 (I’m joking Ai gives me the shudders 😖😖)

[@BlankShee]

@@kirahhdropme too, when I saw the first seconds of the video, I thought of Alice.

[@Murglie]

I think she's tracing and copying an AI generated image. She draws each draws each blocky segment like someone would if they were copying a photo.

[@kuri_curry]

They never had to flip their canvass either. No undo, no erase, fine you could be just painting over the mistakes instead.

[@Stratelier]

As a traditional artist, I've never flipped my canvas.... But jokes aside, not everyone remembers to perform the flip test.

[@Eterna.l-x]

@@Stratelier Yeah I always forget haha

[@jjcymbolic]

@@Stratelier And as a traditional artist, I do flip my canvas. I take a picture and flip it that way. I'm also a digital artist though, and the amount of times I haven't flipped the canvas until I've finished the line art is substantial.... My characters end up with a hard lean I gotta fx.

[@Sfhjgds]

I never flip my canvas.....

[@B.O.Xproject]

Ehhh personally I don't flip often I only really do it if I really don't like my art but that's mainly to get a perspective and not to fix things I also do it once or twice lol But everyone is different And flipping the canvas is common advice so idk how often people flip

[@AnnaWittebabe]

As someone that used to trace images (for practice, they were never posted or anything) her lines look EXTREMELY similar to how mine looked while I was tracing. The fact that her lines for the sketches are as thin and perfect as they are is most of what’s reminding me of how traced art generally looks

[@AnnaWittebabe]

That clown drawing especially. The second I looked at the hands I knew it was traced because that’s just how traced hands look. That’s not saying that it’s impossible for someone to draw hands like that normally, but it’s extremely suspicious when it’s paired up with all the other signs she’s showing of it being traced

[@callmelafey1842]

LMAO i'm looking at the "sketch" at 21:51 and it looks like she traced the face line by line, but the process was so tedious, that on, like braid, elastics and clothing details she just gave up those intricate jewellery and then just a blob for the elastic on the braid guys i can't

[@ran_dom_demon]

1:45 If the person really want to prove that they're not using AI should just add random doddle and that math problem

[@mikamischief1239]

No artist is perfect. Even the best in the world have to hide overdrawn lines, erase overhanging bits, or paint over colors that didn't fit well. We, as human, can't just spit out what's in our brains onto the page. AI, in a way, can, and THAT is why it's always obvious; these "artists" don't even remember that you have to have a base or that mistakes are a part of the process because they don't want to be an artist so much as have the title of one so trick those that don't know any better. That's why it's so scummy.

[@tcreator4914]

5:20 i have a friend who works like that and he does constantly render one thing more than the other (like, give it more texture or more lightning than the other) which means he has to go back a LOT during that kind of process, to keep his drawing consistent, and this "artist" doesn't do that also, it's good to point that out, even in styles that you render chunk by chunk, you have to go back constanty.

[@Fleurig-xr5mm]

The thing is, Procreate doesn't show when you erase something, when you use ctrl+z it will delete the whole part you just drew from the 'speedpaint' that's why I'm still suspicious about this being ai or not 🥲

[@Fleurig-xr5mm]

But like even if it is real, this person has real shitty anatomy knowlegde compared to their shading knowledge 💀

[@tcreator4914]

@ it's not about earasing, it's about returning to other places of the drawing to keep consistency. The person did keep the drawing consisten tho they only touched the eye area, for example, just once!

[@karen-sq6gd]

Based on what I see, I am very sure that she traces a drawing made with AI and then takes the colors from the reference given by AI and starts coloring it

[@maef7026]

Looks like this 30:13 is the only thing she actually drew but it didn't get as many likes so this artist decided to stick to Ai instead because that's what gets them more attention.

[@FPChris]

Hacked up the original photo into random layers

[@manfellafellaman]

I'm guilty of drawing the second eye on layer 56 instead of layer 10 with the first eye

[@ItsJessamy]

Sometimes I feel like people who start drawing themselves keep comparing their art to others, and just settle for AI because they can't live up to the expectations they have for themselves. Of course, that's no excuse at all, but it is a rather sad theory

[@iamThatSandwich]

My entire life up until now I compare my art to others. My art is still pretty shit so I haven't shared it online or tried to use it for an extra little income on the side. WITH that fact, I still refuse to move over to ai because it all looks so overly polished and weird, uncanny is probably the right word.

[@branbrandt3]

I think that’s kind of where I’m at with my own art, but I discovered the magical world of ✨bases✨. I can pay a real artist for their base pose and make my own art off that instead of stealing from people with AI. But I think a lot of people don’t see AI as “that bad” and why they settle for it instead.

[@OwlCity447]

non-artists trying to fake being an artist will never not be funny to me cuz they be doing things that most artists dont do... its like a "how you do, fellow kids?" sort of situation

[@socialwagner]

0:13 YES! the answer is yes and it stands true for 90% of the people. It really doesn't matter if you realize what's going on; it will change nothing.

[@KekoKasane]

Its the lack of erasing for me dawg wow

[@Blue_lily8982]

It amazes me how some people would spend so much time and effort just to fake an AI art as if it's their own, as AI is developing (we were able to recognise it instantly, now we have to do microscopic analysis to prove it's fake, which makes other people think we are paranoid haters) more real artist are getting overshadowed by these fakers. And for what? Admiration for a talent you never had? Why waste time on lying when you can actually draw? And it's not even that bad you can just develop yourself.

[@Vaulterz_thatxguy]

its the fact that they didn't bother to block in the colours and then start rendering, just went straight in with the rendering doing it block by block with no light guide

[@mary0maz]

I do coloring like her too 💀💀💀 i color skin then render it without block in color in other objects like hair clothes etccc then after i color the skin then i color hair and❤render it ( im not defending the artist its so obvious they used ai ) 9:11

[@megankassa3633]

@@mary0mazthat's a normal process

[@Isa-Senseia]

well... you was saying about layer 1... I always do the sketch and delete it later, so almost never I have layer one...

[@KlausHargreaves_x]

It’s funny how all the sketch lines are all flat with no real variation yet she wants us to believe she can render that well?

[@kyomashindo6930]

That's exactly what I noticed. Mostly with tracing lines there isn't any line variation.

[@jaqssmith1666]

that's called an under drawing. it doesn't need lineweight because it's not part of the finished piece.

[@KlausHargreaves_x]

@ yeah and I would let that pass if it wasn’t so detailed it’s liek she was trying to pass it off as the sketch and the lineart as she goes straight into rendering after.

[@asya-35987]

The rendering was ass tho lets be real

[@marsmellon]

@@jaqssmith1666 This was I was thinking. It's funny to read all these comments and realize how no one draws the same. Nothing particular shows that this is AI but we all know that it is, or at least it's traced from one. The rendering isn't much to look at.

[@saltyfroots9]

I literally was watching an artists process earlier who only blocks in the head and then can just sketch out the body from that (incredible btw I wish I was that good) and even they move things around after the fact. The most talented artists in the world move and change things. Traditional artists using oil or acrylics often change things midway through a painting! I’ve seen people who paint hyperrealistic oil portraits paint over entire fully rendered sections of their work in order to change the layout/proportions/colour choices etc. it’s simply unbelievable that someone can create a line art worthy sketch and fully render a piece without changing a single thing and have it come out looking good. Even if someone does go straight into the lines without blocking out shapes, they don’t do it with such confident strokes as to never erase or reposition a single line during the process. Even sketching and then lining over it, I personally am STILL changing things in the line art. Not major things but I don’t always get a line where I want it so I undo and draw it again, or I add in a little extra personality to the final lines that the sketch doesn’t have. None of that happening is the biggest giveaway for these fakers processes. That and the fact that we never see any art besides very complex completed pieces. Most artists I see on social media will post smaller drawings, practice, sketches, warmups etc that they like without making it an elaborate 10 hour artwork. It makes them feel genuine and like real people to see unfinished work and maybe not 100% anatomically correct practice sketches, because realistically nobody is rendering entire works every single time they draw otherwise how on earth do you practice the fundamentals? How to do you keep yourself fresh and well practiced in the basics if you don’t practice and allow yourself the freedom of just sketching silly things out? Not only does AI art steal from real artists and devalue our work, it dehumanises it in the sense that it takes all the fun out of the process (as well as not being made by a human obviously). The whole point of creating is to simply enjoy it! To have fun learning and improving and finding your own style!

[@Swirl_of_StarFire]

Adding the freckles, the details of the amulet, and the shiny thing on the nose before blocking out the ears and the horns is unimaginable for me. I go top down to the point that when I'm animating, I'll often drawn the rough shapes for the whole entire animation before I place any features like the ears and the eyes, even if the animation is made up of multiple shots. Also, that smooth, shiny quality of the colors is generally a dead giveaway that the image is AI generated. I can't describe it better, but there's just that look to a certain brand of AI images, and the elf girl with horns has it

[@rhoux8291]

I don’t know how to describe the AI glowy look either, but it honestly makes me feel a bit nauseous. Is that weird? Like every time I see AI art there is this sickening uncanny saccharine glowy shininess that gives me a feeling that reminds me of eating way too many lollies as a kid and feeling sick.

[@jasperjazzie]

​@@rhoux8291it almost feels like the way things look in a dream, and it's uncanny

[@meike6725]

​@@rhoux8291 Same.. It looks oily or something..

[@lazerpie101_A]

17:51 you can tell it's not real because any actual artist would not see "AI art" as a compliment

[@SobrietyandSolace]

when people say ‘oh my god that’s unreal, did you do that with AI? You PAINTED that?!’ I have such mixed feelings. To some people they think if it looks too good it’s AI, but maybe I should take it as a personal insult if they don’t think I’m capable and just have cheated/am trying to pass it off as my own

[@lazerpie101_A]

@@SobrietyandSolace my personal take on that is you should be annoyed that they're discounting your work as something done by a machine. Like, I am a programmer. I pride myself on creating a lot of my stuff from scratch (maybe a little more than necessary). I would be annoyed if someone said "cool project. What library did you use to do all that?" Because _I did it myself_. They are passing your work off as being done without much effort, and they cannot appreciate or see the small details of your work, from your time working on it.They instead attribute it to a tool that glosses over all the fine details you put in.

[@tomaslaaperi5849]

29 minutes in, I Have a theory on why they don't have the early layers: They have the actual AI artwork in one of those layers, then they remove the AI artwork layer and records them doing an eye or whatever, then stop recording, add the AI artwork layer back again and find the next thing they want to do work in, then when they are ready to draw again, they remove the AI artwork once again and starts the recording. Repeat untill the artwork is fully traced.

[@juliadesouza6674]

The absolute no color changing and no background color or flat color is a nono.

[@SAMc_Creates]

The "sketch" is also sus, bc unless a style is uber simplified, perfect line art doesn't happen on a first draft, and even if the artist gets lucky that it's mostly there on the first round they still tend to erase and redo a couple of things slightly differently. Almost no art is a purely linear process. Also you can't be that good and still be that bad: A human artist who put in the hundreds maybe thousands of hours to learn to line and render like that would also have picked up the fundamentals required to not make rookie mistakes such as making the hair growth directions of the eyebrows look like they belong to different faces or the reflections in the eyes look like they are reflecting totally different scenes.

[@Frikiwiki]

4:39 I do so

[@brielabellie]

congrats ?

[@BreeIsMeTV]

🙋🏾‍♀️ I absolutely color one eye at a time. “Well I do it at the same time🤪” Good for you “Chinese Cinderella” being 1 out of 9 billion people on the planet speaking as if she’s the authority on all of art 🥴 This video would have been worthwhile if she she stuck to the facts, but she’s whining for 32 minutes 😒

[@BreeIsMeTV]

@@brielabellieNot you catching an attitude because this person stated they do it differently, get that nasty attitude in check 🥴

[@brielabellie]

@@BreeIsMeTV yk ur the problem when ur first thought is pointed towards negativity, don’t mention me when u do nothing but assume

[@alexandrab6515]

Same

[@PezziPesi]

15:08 it's the way it's obviously ai because I don't know if you already said it but the horn is coming out of the hood?

[@saix_unicorn]

the biggest givaway for me is the jewelery

[@Damanique]

Watching your explanations, something sinister occurred to me: her intention wasn't to pass off her AI generated art as real using the fake process. It's to generate engagement about AI vs real art and it's working.

[@floof7680]

I was drawing a portrait earlier today and was erasing and redrawing the eyelids for 10 minutes it was semi realism

[@YukiDemonOfHell]

so the whole "starts rendering one part then moves on to another part before they finish the first one" is kinda how I render as someone with adhd, so while I do think this piece is suspicious I don't think that can be used as evidence lol. cause either I got board of rendering one part and wanted to refresh by working on something slightly different, or I just straight up get distracted by the other part. I also sometimes render eye's like that where I'll completely finish one eye before moving on to the next, and tbh I try Not to cause it makes it hard to keep the eye's consistent. Also with the "drawing the base shape of the eye only to make line art away from it", that's also one way I render semi realistic stuff, it's a kinda sculpting method of coloring that really vibes with me. (Tho tbh I DOn't think that's what this person was doing I'm just saying this for future reference) (and lastly nothing I've said here is meant as criticism of kat, just I guess giving my own perspective on things?)

[@ratwriter2197]

With the elf girl with the horns and the hood, even without the odd process the hood itself is like the biggest give away bc fabric doesn't work like that (the shading, the way its wrinkled and the way its shaped and attaches) and the horn disappearing into the shadow of it like that even tho the hood is behind it... Its just so obvious it hurts Oh and the "shirt/dress" under the cloak the AI didn't even try to render omg...

[@RayzorWingTCE]

I draw in such non standard ways that if i ever get accused of using ai I have no way to back myself up- AND IM CONCERNED- examples are: 1.detailed sketches that I use as line art cuz im a perfectionist with no limits. I HATE constructing the drawing, so i skip the whole process and go straight for what would be the end result, aka the line art. 2. I LOVE rendering in chunks, but atleast mines have some logic put into em, probably, for me it feels like it,idk how other people might see it. 3. I merge most of my layers together cuz i use hight DPI for better resolution. I also sometimes rename them or delete my layes wich results into the "layer nr 1 doesnt exist" thing😭 4. I mess up things the way an AI would, but its cuz im really rushed (one art piece takes me 2 hours to complete AT MAX, wich leaves a lot of flaws that i see days later) 5. I love doing details, but due to the fact that I rush everything, they all look messy and people might say its ai generated, altho thats just how i my details (ex: scales, hair, feathers..etc) I do have ADHD wich I think plays a big part into all of these things I got going on. I do have years of studies done in the art field. Countless hours of practice to reach the point of skill at wich im at rn, tons of miney spent on art school and other art related materials/ studies- SO YEAH GUYS I THINK I YAPPED ENOUGH PFFF. If someone is interested in my art works, check my insta and twitter [links in my yt desc] XDDD have a nice day-

[@Eirlys-snonvy]

Okay, first of all.. excuse me?? What the hell was that sketch?? They drew those details as if they knew EXACTLY where they wanted the details to be. No planning at all. No erasing to fix anything. Nothing. Unless they had a reference or another sketch in the background where everything was in place, rarely anybody does that.

[@pillyhere]

Even Samdoesarts liquifies his sketch, the lineart alone looks traced.

[@Karmaisabreez]

Ai is the worst thing that could happen to the people of the internet.

[@shadicy]

ai generated images*

[@myxk0369]

Tbh my process is REALLY similar to hers , mostly because i get hyper focused on like one feature or too lazy to complete a feature so i move on however i do erase things quite often which i never see her do in the speedpaint which is CRAZY to me cuz most artists (pro or not ) do erase !!

[@maxim3939]

Had this on my FYP today and the comments were absolutely hilarious trying to defend this

[@Catofnighty]

I don't think 22k strokes could realistically pull this off with all the teeny tiny strokes shown in the process

[@froggycolouring]

10~ hours for such a high render drawing is really suspicious, I’ve spent wayy longer on way less rendered drawings

[@demiremi]

Some people are just that fast tbh. There are some artists that can crank out high quality work in just a half hour to an hour. Some four hours.Just comes with the mileage. Just lookup some of the artists on miiverse archives some where doing work that was pretty high quality in 30 mins to an hour. Everybody is different, what takes long for you or me could be quick or take a while. Just depends on the person. Have a good day.

[@DeltawaveTheProtogen]

Some artists do render their work in such short time (sometimes shorter), but that REALLY depends on their style and work flow.

[@Eterna.l-x]

Samdoesart with 2 hours, there is this one animator with 30 mins

[@carmillaaaa]

Tbf I could do something like that in a couple of hours, but the process is basically the opposite of what the video shows. Speed just comes with experience, the more you understand about the fundamentals various techniques and tools the easier and faster making art becomes. The sus part is the process used in the rendering video is the way only someone who doesn’t really understand what they’re doing would draw, yet the quality of the final image (if we ignore the obvious AI elements) would require at least above intermediate knowledge and skill. The math ain’t mathing.

[@shadicy]

some artists are just quick and efficient. check out remarin, her art is very high quality and she gets it done in about an average of 2 hours or more.

[@carrot6286]

So much effort and passion into faking rather than learning

[@ViABonnie]

I hate AI scammers sm

[@kaylafoxx41]

I've been an industry illustrator for 16 years, and I do NONE of this, and none of my coworkers ever did either. This is very obviously AI. To do something like that, with that process, it would take significantly longer than 6 hours. No color palette to pick from on the canvas, no nothing for all that lighting. And WHY would you make a hood on the character that one horn goes through while the other doesn't? The horns also are coming out of differnt parts of the head. Even without the melting hood into the ear, it's a mess. And the background ear is wholly anatomically different than the foreground one.

[@limey24]

She's super sus, this is ai art not real art, and maybe stole it as well, so she's ai user, art stealer and does not make real digital art, and she's super sus. If tiktok gets banned = good news

[@sampdesigns]

Holy shit those layers are-..a mess. Theres so much random amounts and placements for what was "drawn". As you say, the eyes are..WEIRD. Almost the entire face? Then different progresses of eyes and..a single dark shadow of the eye? It feels like..a LOT of cut/masked things from the finished AI put into multiple layers randomly. The layer 1 isnt that weird to me cause you could delete layers as you go constantly..but like...nothing in the friggin "process" shows no layer that would be clearly a layer 1 deletable situation. Layer 1 was probably the original AI image pasted in.. And ya that sketching is sus too

[@doomscroll-m3h]

i was trying to tell the ppl in her comments but theyre so dense

[@evelynhugo7_]

literally everyone was flaming her what are you on

[@doomscroll-m3h]

@evelynhugo7_ wow someone's pissy. Almost no one was in her comments when the video was fresh dear which is when I was talking to her direct audience thank you? Damn so fucking weird

[@quiwing]

a lot of the ones r actually defending her it’s wild

[@doomscroll-m3h]

@quiwing exactly. Not to mention I was the earliest viewers where no one else knew yet i felt insane😭👎🏽 the other comment made me giggle

[@aranavenger]

2:35 How many artists draw like Kim Jung Gi and never need to erase? Basically just Kim Jung Gi RIP

[@Biggiecheese20]

Yeah we're getting so used to AI images in general and we can just tell at a glance, artist or not. Well usually at least, us younger folk. But we can tell LOL

[@ArdraGopal-s7o]

Been drawing since I was 6, I am 23. This is AI.

[@AmaneLikesSalsa]

Bruh, always ai

[@JepMZ]

If not ai, tracing

[@Anyratac]

Layer 1 for me is always references that I end up deleting later cause I cut it out of the canvas XD

[@hithere235]

TikTok has been having such a big issue with people posting ai art and claiming it as their own. The other day I saw someone ask someone for a speed paint and they told them that they forgot to record one when they were drawing on procreate! Like it automatically saves one, that’s how I knew it was ai.

[@n2paints]

some people with low storage and slow processor switch it off to save space and power

[@carmillaaaa]

You can have it turned off or on, so not having a recording doesn’t really mean anything on it’s own. I don’t usually record my art because I have no reason to. That’s a non-issue for real artists because you have your drafts, layered files, and of course the ability to literally just draw in front of people if there’s ever a valid reason to need to prove your art is your own.

[@AzhiDahaki]

Her sketches look like tattoo stencils, which are essentially traces

[@oudehmish]

This is definitely ai 😂 so crazy that they claim it as their own art

[@yeos_angel_]

As an artist that used to do digital realism, heres how my process would work: typically id find a reference. One drawing that i did was of Bucky from Captain America: the first avenger when they came back from the pow camp. Id sketch it out with the image in the corner and adjust based on the image. For some more complex ones like a street that I did in a color blocking style, id use a grid method. Then id do a solid base layer based on the area so skin tone for skin area and so on. Id fill that layer as perfectly as i could to use it as a clip layer. Then id just start rendering it. I personally would work in sections bc i drew on my phone and it was just easier with the screen size. So id typically start with the eyes bc i have extensive experience drawing eyes they sort of make or break a realism drawing so i get them out of the way. Then id expand from that, working on one eye and then extending until I reached the other eye and work my way down, leaving the lips last on the face bc I suck at them. Id leave the hair last because it generally goes over the skin layer. I usually didnt draw a background bc im lazy. This drawing process in the video does not make sense to me. Its clear that this isnt ai art that theyre trying to pass off as theirs but ai art that theyve drawn over. They have experience with art but not very much bc tbh their blending job is shit on the cape. As far as im aware, the app they used has a feature to hide a layer from the recording (i use ibispaintx so idk if thats true) and to me it looks like they probably hid it from the recording and while they were recording themselves physically drawing, they were just winging it or were erasing a layer to expose something theyd already drawn. Ylanast is a scammer who uses that technique to fool people. As for the layers, id get anxious about having too many so when id finish an area like the iris of an eye, id merge the layers so there'd be less. Either way, its a shit drawing that looks terrible. Why even bother going through all this effort when I know the ai version didn't look much better?

[@loll.ipoplyn]

Another thing I noticed about the elf piece is that the hood disappears, or looked as if it did. When it melts into the ear it doesn’t continue behind it- the hair doesn’t cover ALL of that, especially with how loose looking the hood is supposed to be?? Idk- MAYBE THATS JUST ME

[@moroshka3421]

i noticed that too!! and on the left (elf's right) side the cloth under the chin doesn't match the part that comes out from behind the braid

[@BoneBugg]

another sign of tracing in the sketch is that there is a weird amout of detail. like in the eyes for example, the reflections within the eye are sketched in. i have never seen an artist who does that, not that its not possible, just that its awkward and unnessesary

[@floof7680]

Im convinced she’s erasing

[@dylanagoblin9298]

Two things I want to add 1 in favour of the artist 1 against her. 1) I use procreate and I merge my layers down to persevere layers because there is a layer limit with higher DPI she could’ve used a multiply layer for example but merged it down meaning all of her layers are normal to conserve the amount of layers used so you don’t run out 2) you can exempt layers from the speed drawing so it doesn’t appear it’s incredibly easy to fake a speed drawing in procreate I’ve done tik tok videos explaining how people fake these videos before In conclusion, especially with the missing layer 1 it seems very likely this is AI and after watching your video I’m fairly convinced. Some people do similar techniques to this artist but all combined together it’s very suspicious. It’s not that the drawing is “so good she couldn’t have done it” it contains mistakes in ways an artist with that skill wouldn’t make. I mean the hood is literally missing on the right and the sketch is quite clearly just being traced from an invisible layer missing from the speed drawing. If she really sketched like that she would make videos showing how easily she can sketch instead she shows a speed drawing because she knows she can’t hide the invisible layer unless it’s a speed drawing. With the added knowledge that layers can be hidden from speed drawings her videos feel very intentional in the way she records them. EDIT: only drawing in this video she didn’t trace was the one where she showed her sketching phase which is the braid picture right at the end. Why would she choose to show speed paints of her lineart instead of showing how easily she can sketch the chibi horn girl, unless she physically needs to make it a speed paint to hide the reference. That’s my conclusion.

[@ShinOpaque]

This is a great example of, its not one thing, hes everything together. I know I draw weird. I will do eye completely and then the other. I have weird layering. But when you put all this crap together it just looks so fake Its painful to see them try to pretend its not.

[@notshardain]

I've seen people do one eye at a time with traditional quite frequently, but it's usually specifically because you have to move from right to left or left to right depending on your dominant hand, or else you'll smudge your work. Sometimes primarily trad artists do this too when they do digital art, but this is obviously not that type of situation based on the way and order she chose which chunks to render.

[@notshardain]

the hood blending into the ear and the horn going nowhere scream AI. Also, the piece with the chain is super suspicious, that chain is a mangled mess and is definitely AI.

[@sodapopjam]

I used to use layer styles to color, but to be honest , my art ended up looking "dirty". So I stopped and only use normal layers, and I've only started using multiply and add recently due to live2d. But for regular art, I just never use layer effects. So that is not odd 😂

[@callme_star_ye]

1. The braids look off (mostly the left one) 2. The earing is in an odd place. 3. The second horn is not blended like the first (could be laziness but doubt.) 4. The left ear also looks odd. And the hood you see, the upper lart of the hood is rather closer to her hair but is suddenly gets thicker. 21:42 also to mention under the horn you can see fur. I first thought "oh she/he is originally wamted to make an ear, but then looking closer you can see its the literal horn. (Right horn)

[@floof7680]

Its the jewlery lineart for me…

[@WOWOW_3]

100% AI. But her layers look like mine, all over the place and makes no sense unless you know what I’m doing. I come from a traditional background, so layers are still somewhat new to me. I tend to paint an entire piece on one layer. The other layers might contain just one eye or random splotches, mainly for patching over the main layer if I want to experiment or something.

[@LittleSatyr]

Even as someone who does tend to make more clean and detailed sketches, as it makes it easier for me when it gets to the lineart phase, this is extremely suspicious?? I always need construction lines to work off of so I know where to place everything, I need to flip the canvas, erase, resize, deform, etc, just to make sure it looks acceptable. I can draw without undoing/erasing parts, but it's mostly just very simple chibi doodles with a ball point pen, and it's never going to be even close to being as clean as when I make edits as I go. And the fact that she went from the first piece that you showed, which I do believe is her art, to suddenly be skilled enough to draw such elaborate things without undoing/erasing?? Yeah no sorry I don't believe it for a second.

[@SuperHornetX]

Easiest way to tell if something is 100% AI is lack of consistency and symmetry. If you look at any of her "art" featuring chains, they are all morphed and make absolutely no sense.

[@emmamiller3993]

This is the first time I actually watched the situation happen in real time 😂 Kept getting all the parts on my fyp

[@Tundra_sucalamo]

I cant speak much as i draw very stylized but i use my layers for multiple things if theyre not close to eachother (an dumb example is when i used of my flat layer for the blade of a sword to block shade the characters hair) and i rarely use multiply layers

[@Tundra_sucalamo]

Its why i dont ever post them lol The fact i tend to completely render random parts i like right after line art probably doesnt help lol (metal fang i finished before the lineart ily) Im just glad i dont draw good enough for people to think i use ai lol

[@BigPenstroker]

"curious" Hun ur Alice in wonderland fr fr

[@alina_7291]

that's heartbreaking to see. as an artist myself, i feel so so bad for the society that we're becoming

[@docterpuggie127]

For once I have seen the original and when I looked at it on my FYP I was a bit skeptic all and the comments proved my theory lol 😅

[@Phlogiston2312]

This is why I like doing traditional artwork cuz you don't get accused of doing AI art

[@lolovecat]

Another thing that makes it very easy to spot that it's traced, that we don't talk enough of, is the fact they did sketch every little shadows. Don't get me wrong, artists do sketch shadows, but it goes from the biggest shapes to the smallest shapes. We STRUCTURE our shadows. Here, it's looking like the lines you will get when you use the photoshop "artistic" filters commonly used with photos or the one to turn 3D into "drawing" in CSP. I'm definitly not saying this is what they do, just that when people traces w/o understanding the shapes of the shadows, they'll just draw over every lines they notices and it looks similar so it's easy to spot.

[@kitti3thesnake581]

the funny thing about a lot of these people who fake using ai and then pretend to show their process is that they don't know how artists actually work xD their fake processes are always just so---- huh???

[@rosemarythesheep8272]

The part where you said that her strokes didn't match the right color reminded me of this other artist that would paint over art and then erase stuff to pretend she was painting it.