The common example I hear in Psychology class is: if someone gets cuts in front of you while driving, you assume their just a jerk or a an idiot, but if you do it to someone else, you think about your external situation like how you’re late for work or how your loved one has been hospitalized.
@GrowthMindsetChannel3 жыл бұрын
Great example, perspective changes everything
@SecretAgentLamarScrotus Жыл бұрын
We judge other people based on their action but we judge ourselves by our intentions
@amber5835 Жыл бұрын
actor-observer bias?
@anthraxmilkshake58763 жыл бұрын
The low and high of consistency are supposed to be the inverse of consensus and distinctiveness with regard to internal vs external attribution. It isn't low, low, low that indicates internal attribution, but rather low, low, high.
@theviper3581 Жыл бұрын
yeah I noticed he made an error
@tristessa771 Жыл бұрын
Thank you! I was like, that doesn't make any sense.
@cyborgzulu20113 жыл бұрын
Wanna say thank you very much. Needed this. Our textbook is not great at explaining things. Plus I learn more visually, thanks so much! Your drawings really helped me.
@kribook5 ай бұрын
I realized how I always caught myself thinking of my intentions whenever I do something out of the ordinary, but when I change my perspective to that of the people observing me, I knew I would’ve thought something completely different. Glad to understand more of this thought process in this video. Thanks for uploading!
@yashaswinib.8363 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed the video. Educational! there's an error though: you said when all three low- it's the personality. and all three high it's external events. That's incorrect. When consensus and distinctiveness are low but consistency high- then it's attributed to internal factors. And when consensus and distinctiveness are high but consistency is low- then it's attributed to external factors.
@jayshoenhair98252 жыл бұрын
was just thinking this, thanks for pointing it out!
@bibliothek8911 Жыл бұрын
@@DrChristyC❤
@darrensim76834 ай бұрын
Thank you, I thought that was the case. Believed i wasn’t understanding it correct.
@allanholmes57873 жыл бұрын
This is GREAT ! No rubbish background music just very good content well present Bravo : )
@shaunsfx38453 жыл бұрын
“Humans are meaning, making creatures” - The most used line by Practical Psychology
@cuz3 жыл бұрын
Why there's a comma?
@idontevenuseyoutubebro2 жыл бұрын
@@cuz mating 👺
@bonnett54633 жыл бұрын
I love the way this channel, PRACTICAL PSYCHOLOGY explains the material; AND, I love the material ❗
@hadeebabazaz93603 жыл бұрын
I would like to add on a suggestion. Your presentation, the way things are drawn are pretty well. It overshadows what is being said. It grabs the attention of the listener and becomes the focus, whereas what you are saying is meant to he understood
@bisschenkonstruktiv3 жыл бұрын
At 5:05 , why would low consistency make me conclude that "That is just who they are"? I feel like if a person behaves consistently, then you would say that is who they are
@nehamotwani64773 жыл бұрын
Yes, i noticed that too. In consistency only the attribution should be different than the other too. I think it should be named as inconsistency factor, then it will be same in all three.
@GrowthMindsetChannel3 жыл бұрын
So close to 2 mill subs dude, you’re smashing it 💪🏻💪🏻💪🏻
@jazzybee.3 жыл бұрын
If consistency is high, isn't it an internal attribution?
@MichaelC-to7uz5 ай бұрын
Overall a great video. Good job Sir.
@kayleighdw Жыл бұрын
Wow you explained it so well!! Thank you
@cache53633 жыл бұрын
I think the high and low consistency explanations were swapped, but otherwise great video!
@brainfood98232 жыл бұрын
Yes!
@rumbidzaimadzokere45188 ай бұрын
Thank you so.much now i understand attribution ❤
@qualia_3 жыл бұрын
You deserve more views..
@Exodus26.13Pi3 жыл бұрын
This's the best method.
@simonemiller935911 ай бұрын
Which I could give the video more than one like. Thank you
@danaking74839 ай бұрын
Interesting information. Thank you for sharing
@worldofpsychology52093 жыл бұрын
Your videos are very helpful
@vinaysuryavanshi19643 жыл бұрын
Thanks for ur explanation
@ImprovementUniversity3 жыл бұрын
Awesome content as always. Keep making these highly educational videos. In fact I have a similar video in my channel, what a coincidence 😉.
@tomhawksley3602 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much!
@tanyaupadhyay53653 жыл бұрын
Good one !
@MichaelC-to7uz5 ай бұрын
External factors are elements outside of a company that can affect its performance. These factors can be determined by a variety of factors, including: Social factors: These include consumer values, attitudes, beliefs, wants, desires, and market needs and preferences. Population demographics, such as age, gender, ethnicity, race, income, location, and education, are also considered social factors. Political factors: These include government policies, leadership, foreign trade policies, tax policy, regulation, and de-regulation trends. Technological factors: These include technological advances. Economic factors: These include the economic climate. Environmental factors: These include environmental factors. Competitive factors: These include competition. Global factors: These include major global events. A PESTEL analysis can be used to identify external factors that may affect a strategic plan. This analysis examines political, economic, social, technological, environmental, and legal factors. Market research can also be performed to gather data on market trends, customer preferences, and competitor activities.
@Mr_Candid2 жыл бұрын
I have a small doubt that distinctiveness and consistency look somewhat similar. Can anyone explain to me the difference in brief
@elena628 Жыл бұрын
Consistency would be same action in same environment and distinctiveness would relate to the specific characteristic that is shown - in this case enjoys the finer things in life - does the person showcase that characteristic in different environments? I think this is the difference but I'm not sure I am currently learning
@goransimon87113 жыл бұрын
wait, so if the friends doesn't order an expensive wine frequently its personality? Not the sutuation? If it was the personality, would't he always do it? Still, great vid! :)
@jayshoenhair98252 жыл бұрын
Agreed.. I think they may have fumbled the details a bit..
@Elfos643 жыл бұрын
Think you could go into more detail on misattribution in another video?
@asokasamarajeewa90203 жыл бұрын
what is the major attributes transmitted among the youth through social media?
@AH-zo1nn3 жыл бұрын
Off topic... i miss the nice background music u used to use. The one you used in the self love videos.
@amiradel62742 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this amazing explanation, I would ask about Rubicon model and theory of planned behavior, I need explanation about theme because I found hardly to understand
@妙笔声画3 жыл бұрын
谢谢分享!
@هبهحسينشاكرشبلي3 жыл бұрын
is situational the same as disounting?????
@scottthomas58192 жыл бұрын
Yes
@ayakorpearl1581 Жыл бұрын
Can someone please explain the distinctiveness more to me?
@ekaarzoo2 жыл бұрын
This technique of hand and drawing .... How can one make videos using this animation style?
@-_-SpongeBob3 жыл бұрын
I miss that background guitar music
@user-vn7ce5ig1z3 жыл бұрын
(Gestalt = /gesht-alt/ not /jesst-alt/)
@AryaStark473 жыл бұрын
Girl 1: so brave 💙💙 Girl 2: punk Me: bird person.
@1000nanomech3 жыл бұрын
Are you copying the course from Dr. Andrew, all your videos recently seem from his course
@mdzcfd3 жыл бұрын
is this Primink? Is this what you been doing?
@rishiaman23 жыл бұрын
hmm
@jayshoenhair98252 жыл бұрын
The example in this video does not make sense.
@ArcWelder5883 жыл бұрын
Somewhere in here we can find the answers to racism